Skip to main content

Full text of "Report of the Senate Fact-Finding Committee on Un-American Activities"

See other formats


DO  CUT/  RTMENT 


SAN  FRANCISCO  PUBLIC  LIBRARY 


3  1223  90214  9484 


Digitized  by  the  Internet  Archive 
in  2013 


http://archive.org/details/reportofsenatefa1955cali 


CALIFORNIA  LEGISLATURE 


Eighth  Report  of  the 

Senate  Fact- Finding  Committee 

On  Un-American  Activities 

1955 

MEMBERS  OF  THE  COMMITTEE 

SENATOR  NATHAN  F.  COOMBS,  Vice  Chairman         SENATOR  JOHN  F.  McCARTHY 
SENATOR  EARL  D.  DESMOND  SENATOR  JOHN  F.  THOMPSON 

SENATOR  HUGH  M.  BURNS,  Chairman 

R.  E.  COMBS,  Counsel  MARY  E.  HOPE,  Executive  Secretary 

VERNICE  PERHUS,  Secretary  ELIZABETH  W.  NIELSEN,  Secretory 


Published  by  the 

SENATE 

LIEUTENANT  GOVERNOR  HAROLD  J.  POWERS 
President  of  the  Senate 

BEN  HULSE  JOSEPH  A.  BEEK 

President  pro  Tempore  Secretary 


<3  0l,lS~ 
714811 


LETTER  OF  TRANSMITTAL 

Senate  Chamber,  State  Capitol 

Sacramento,  June  6, 1955 
Hon.  Harold  J.  Powers 
President  of  the  Senate,  and  Gentlemen  of  the  Senate; 
Senate  Chamber,  Sacramento,  California 

Mr.  President  and  Gentlemen  of  the  Senate  :  Pursuant  to  Senate 
Resolution  No.  127,  which  appears  at  page  3096  of  the  Senate  Journal 
for  May  25,  1953,  the  Senate  Fact-Finding  Committee  on  Un-American 
Activities  was  created  and  the  following  Members  of  the  Senate  were 
appointed  to  said  committee  by  the  Senate  Committee  on  Rules : 

Senator  Nathan  F.  Coombs 
Senator  Earl  D.  Desmond 
Senator  John  F.  McCarthy 
Senator  John  F.  Thompson 
Senator  Hugh  M.  Burns 

The  committee  herewith  submits  a  report  of  its  investigation,  find- 
ings, and  recommendations. 


Respectfully  submitted, 


Hugh  M.  Burns,  Chairman 
Nathan  F.  Coombs,  Vice  Chairman 
Earl  D.  Desmond 
John  F.  McCarthy 
John  F.  Thompson 


TABLE  OF  CONTENTS 

Page 
LETTER  OF  TRANSMITTAL III 

WESTMINSTER   SCHOOL  IMPROVEMENT  ASSOCIATION 1 

Public  Hearing,  Los  Angeles,  July,  1954 6 

Testimony  of  Albin  Czerniawski 7 

Testimony  of  Lloyd  W.  Thomas 21 

Testimony  of  LeRoy  Carlin  King 32 

Testimony  of  W.  L.  Reid 34 

Conclusions 38 

THE  CASE  OF  DORIS  BRIN  WALKER 48 

Misrepresentation  to  Gain  Employment 52 

Wilkinson  and  Eisenberg  Cases 66 

COMMUNIST  INFILTRATION  OF  THE  MEDICAL  PROFESSION 70 

Officers  of  the  Los  Angeles  County  Medical  Association 71 

Testimony  of  J.  Phillip  Sampson,  M.D. 75 

Testimony  of  Ewing  Turner,  M.D 81 

Testimony  of  Lewis  Albert  Alesen,  M.D 85 

Testimony  of  Joseph  Manuel  de  los  Reyes,  M.D 92 

Testimony  of  Chester  L.  Roberts,  M.D 104 

Testimony  of  Ben  Frees,  M.D 114 

Testimony  of  Nathaniel  Bercovitz,  M.D 118 

Testimony  of  Eugene  F.  Hoffman,  M.D 126 

Testimony  of  E.  Vincent  Askey,  M.D 128 

American  Bar  President  Supports  Doctors 142 

Testimony  of  George  W.  Nilsson,  Esq 142 

Medical  School  Deans  Testify 145 

Testimony  of  Dean  Walter  E.  McPherson,  M.D 145 

Testimony  of  Dean  Stafford  L.  Warren,  M.D 146 

Communist  Fronts  and  Their  Members . 150 

Testimony  of  Jack  Flasher,  M.D 139 

Testimony  of  Thomas  L.  Perry,  M.D 151 

Testimony  of  Jack  Flasher,  M.D.    (continued) 170 

Stipulated  Testimony  of  Morris  R.  Feder,  M.D 173 

Testimony  of  Martin  Hall   176 

Testimony  of  Murray  Korngold,  Psychologist 186 

Testimony  of  Rose  Boyd 193 

Testimony  of  Ken  Hartford 198 

Testimony  of  Franklin  Bissell,  M.D 206 

Murray  Abowitz,  M.D.,  Excused  From  Subpena 208 

Testimony  of  Joseph  Hittelman,  M.D 209 

Testimony  of  Richard  W.  Lippman,  M.D. 221 

Testimony  of  Saul  Matlin,  Osteopath 233 

Testimony  of  P.  Price  Cobbs,  M.D 237 

Testimony  of  Wilbur  Z.  Gordon,  M.D 241 

Testimony  of  Lenore  Sutton 252 

Testimony  of  Marvin  Sure,  Optometrist 260 

Stipulated  Testimony  of  Jacob  Agins,  M.D 263 

Exposure  of  Communist  Fronts  and  Their  Members 

Testimony  of  Sidney  M.  Kolodny,  M.D 134 

Testimony  of  Oner  B.  Barker,  Jr.,  M.D 264 

Testimony  of  Louise  Light,  Osteopath 271 

Testimony  of  Mrs.  Ruth  Drader 290 

Testimony  of  Marden  A.  Alsberge,  M.D 367 


TABLE  OF  CONTENTS-Continued 

Page 

Documentary  Proof 379 

The  Concept  of  Class  War 379 

Association  of  Internes  and  Medical  Students — AIMS 381 

Discrimination  Survey- — ASP  Medical  Division 382 

Frontier  Magazine 383 

Martin  Hall's  Speech  Outline 384 

The  Civil  Rights  Congress 385 

Arts,  Sciences  and  Professions  Council  Ballot 386 

Committee  for  the  Defense  of  Foreign  Born 387 

Conference  on  Economic  Rights  for  Negi-o  Women 391 

Arts,  Sciences  and  Professions  Council 392 

Saturday  Evening  Post  Editorial 394 

Letter  From  Los  Angeles  County  Medical  Association 395 

COMMUNIST  INFILTRATION  OF  PUBLIC  UTILITIES  IN 

CALIFORNIA    396 

The  Communist  Front:  First  Step  Toward  Subversion 396 

Targets  for  Infiltration 399 

San  Francisco  Hearing,  August,  1953 402 

Testimony  of  Travis  Lafferty 402 

Testimony  of  Patrick  Hancock   403 

Testimony  of  Holden  Hayden    403 

Testimony  of  Silas  Stanley 404 

Testimony  of  Joseph  Chasin    404 

Testimony  of  Donald  W.  Powers 405 

Los  Angeles  Hearing,  January,  1954 406 

Testimony  of  Cyril  H.  Gius 406 

Testimony  of  Eleanor  Dodge 409 

Testimony  of  Clarence  Simo    409 

Testimony  of  William  G.  Bankhead 409 

Testimony  of  Arthur  A.   Savage 410 

Testimony  of  Collis  D.  Spurlin 410 

Testimony  of  Samuel  A.  Philips : 412 

Testimony  of  Eleanor  Philips    414 

Testimony  of  Elna  Vandergoot    416 

Testimony  of  Evelyn  Banke 416 

Testimony  of  Worden  McDonald 416 

Testimony  of  Floyd  Rice    417 

Testimony  of  Albert  S.  Kanagy 417 

LOS  ANGELES  CITY  SCHOOL  SYSTEM 419 

Testimony  of  Jack  Armand  Chasson 419 

Testimony  of  Serrill  Leonard  Gerber 420 

Testimony  of  Evelyn  Capell  Howard 421 

Testimony  of  Lucille  Gurev 421 

Testimony  of  Essie  Brown 422 

Testimony  of  John  A.  Campbell 422 

Testimony  of  Charlotte  Appel 423 

Local  430,  Los  Angeles  Federation  of  Teachers 423 

Testimony  of  Harry  Shepro 427 

Testimony  of  Jerry  George  Novotny 428 

THE  SCHUYTEN  CASE 432 

THE  LURE  OF  THE  COMMUNIST  FRONT 434 

Los  Angeles  Hearing,  July,  1954 434 

Testimony  of  Howard  Estabrook 43G 

Testimony  of  Jesse  L.  Lasky,  Jr 439 

Testimony  of  Albert  Lewis 439 

Testimony  of  William  Kozlenko   439 

Testimony  of  Art  Arthur 441 


TABLE  OF  CONTENTS-Continued 

Page 

Testimony  of  Loring  Fiske 442 

Testimony  of  Mary  McCall  Bramson 444 

Testimony  of  Paul  Franklin 446 

Testimony  of  Lou  Greenspahn 440 

LETTERS  AND  STATEMENTS   447 

Irene  Tedrow  Kent 447 

Mistaken  Identity   448 

George  E.  Bodle 448 

Letters 452 

Henry  Hersch  Hart 452 

William  N.  Robson 452 

Maurice  J.  Karpf 452 

C.  M.  Gibbens 453 

National  Council  Against  Conscription 453 

Sonoma  County  Pomona  Grange  Number  1 453 

Robert  B.  Pettengill 454 

Harold  Goldman    455 

Frank   L.   Moss 455 

Joseph  Hoffman 456 

Richard  B.  Hubler 456 

Delmer  L.  Davies 456 

Sy  Bartlett 456 

Sheridan  Gibney   457 

Arthur  Schwartz 458 

Norman  Houston 459 

Thomas  H.  A.  Lewis 459 

Harry  P.  M.  Brown _i 459 

I.  A.  L.  Diamond 459 

Bernard  Burton 460 

Herbert  Kline 460 

Maxwell  Shane 460 

De  Witt  Bodeen 461 

Emmett  G.  Lavery,  Sr 461 

Joseph  Than 462 

True  Boardman 463 

CONCLUSIONS 465 


WESTMINSTER  SCHOOL  IMPROVEMENT  ASSOCIATION 

INTRODUCTION 

The  committee's  attention  was  first  directed  to  alleged  subversive 
elements  in  the  City  of  Westminster,  California,  when  certain  school 
officials  contacted  representatives  of  the  committee  in  Sacramento,  ex- 
pressing suspicion  that  subversive  influences  were  interfering  with  the 
educational  system.  This  was  during  the  latter  part  of  1953.  There- 
after, the  committee  addressed  a  letter  to  some  of  the  complainants  in- 
forming them  that  "*  *  *  If  investigation  discloses  that  the  activity 
is  of  a  local  political  character,  we  would  be  without  jurisdiction.  If, 
on  the  other  hand,  some  subversive  elements  are  discovered,  we  will  take 
such  action  as  the  facts  may  warrant. ' ' 

Accordingly,  the  committee  was  sent  various  newspaper  clippings  and 
other  documentary  material  indicating  that  there  was  some  basis  for 
the  suspicion  and  that  further  investigation  should  be  made. 

On  April  24,  1954,  additional  detailed  data  was  received — followed 
by  documents  which  indicated  that  the  charges  and  countercharges  in 
Westminster  and  the  adjacent  vicinity  had  grown  to  such  proportions 
that  there  was  a  real  necessity  to  settle  the  matter,  if  possible.  Aside 
from  the  matter  of  running  the  suspicions  and  rumors  to  the  ground 
and  determining  whether  or  not  they  were  based  on  fact,  there  now 
appeared  to  be  such  an  atmosphere  of  confusion,  suspicion  and  com- 
munity tension  in  the  City  of  Westminster  that  the  committee  was 
urged  by  several  of  its  citizens  to  provide  a  forum  whereby  the  matter 
could  be  thoroughly  aired  and  settled  once  and  for  all.  Certainly,  by 
mid- April,  1954,  the  situation  in  Westminster  was  such  that  the  school 
system  was  unquestionably  affected. 

Prime  mover  in  the  effort  to  uncover  these  alleged  subversive  influ- 
ences in  the  schools  was  Mr.  Lloyd  W.  Thomas,  editor  of  a  weekly  paper, 
The  Westminster  Herald.  His  interest  as  a  newspaper  man  was  first 
aroused  when  the  local  school  board  fired  one  of  its  principals  for  in- 
decent conduct.  A  petition  by  citizens  prompted  the  board  to  investigate 
the  conduct  of  its  employee  in  the  first  instance,  and  in  March,  1953, 
it  held  a  hearing,  received  evidence  and  made  the  order  which  term- 
inated his  services.  The  individual  thus  discharged  was  supported  and 
defended  by  persons  suspected  by  Mr.  Thomas  of  being  subversive. 
After  the  case  had  terminated,  this  little  group  attacked  the  school 
board  and  sought  to  have  them  defeated  at  the  election  held  in  May, 
1953.  Unsuccessful  in  this  attempt,  they  then   formed  an  organization 

(1) 


Z  UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES   IN   CALIFORNIA 

known  as  The  Tri-City  Advisory  Committee  (comprising  the  cities  of 
Westminster,  Midwest  City  and  Barber  City)  with  a  membership  of 
11  persons. 

In  January,  1954,  Mr.  Thomas  got  word  that  another  organization, 
known  as  The  School  Improvement  Association,  had  been  launched. 
When  he  discovered  that  a  meeting  was  to  be  held  at  the  home  of  a 
Mr.  Lyle  Richards,  he  decided  to  attend  and  find  out  for  himself  what 
the  movement  was  about  and  what  the  organization  intended  to  accom- 
plish. Not  being  accorded  a  very  warm  reception  and  feeling  that  he 
was  being  sidetracked,  Thomas  realized  that  apparently  the  new  organi- 
zation was  not  anxious  to  get  any  publicity  in  his  paper.  This  served 
only  to  whet  his  curiosity  and  convince  him  that  the  organization  had 
something  it  wished  to  conceal  from  public  scrutiny.  Persistence  is  a 
characteristic  with  which  Mr.  Thomas  is  abundantly  endowed.  Further- 
more, it  is  almost  an  axiom  that  if  one  wants  to  arouse  the  zeal  and 
curiosity  of  a  newspaper  man,  the  surest  means  is  to  convince  him  that 
he  is  being  sidetracked  from  a  newsworthy  target. 

As  he  delved  deeper  into  the  new  organization,  Thomas  became  in- 
terested in  its  dominant  members.  One  of  them  had  taken  some  part 
in  the  matter  involving  the  discharged  school  principal,  had  played  a 
part  in  the  school  board  election,  and  appeared  to  be  one  of  the  principal 
figures  in  the  newly-formed  School  Improvement  Association.  This  was 
Mr.  Albin  Czerniawski. 

Thomas  looked  up  Czerniawski 's  background  and  discovered  that  he 
had  been  a  member  of  the  Independent  Progressive  Party  in  California. 
This  prompted  him  to  make  inquiries  of  Czerniawski 's  friends,  neigh- 
bors, business  associates,  and  his  colleagues  in  the  School  Improvement 
Association.  Czerniawski,  when  he  first  learned  that  Thomas  was  en- 
gaged in  probing  into  his  past,  became  resentful  and  soon  the  affair 
had  developed  to  a  point  where  the  supporters  of  Thomas,  on  the  one 
hand,  and  the  supporters  of  Czerniawski,  on  the  other,  gave  rise  to  an 
almost  unbelievable  atmosphere  of  suspicion  and  hostility. 

This  was  not  abated  when  Mr.  Thomas,  in  the  issue  of  his  paper  for 
May  21,  1954,  printed  a  photostatic  reproduction  of  Czerniawski 's  reg- 
istration in  the  Independent  Progressive  Party,  together  with  a  quota- 
tion from  the  fourth  report  of  this  committee  to  the  effect  that  the  In- 
dependent Progressive  Party  in  this  State  was  Communist  dominated. 
In  that  connection  it  should  be  noted  that  Mr.  Hugh  Bryson,  former 
state  head  of  the  Independent  Progressive  Party,  was  recently  charged 
with  having  lied  when  he  stated  under  oath  that  he  was  not  a  Com- 
munist, and  ordered  to  stand  trial  for  perjury. 

The  article  from  the  Westminster  Herald  is  as  follows: 


UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  6 

"Bare  Affiliation  of  Improvement  Man 
"Threats,  Dares  and  Punch  to  Editor  Leads  to  Disclosure 

"A  slip  backwards  towards  violence  and  secrecy  took  place  last 
week  at  Paysen's  Sundries  where  Albin  Czerniawski  came  into 
the  business  place  and  caused  a  public  disturbance,  threatening  the 
Herald  editor  with  murder  if  the  Westminster  Herald  continued  to 
look  into  past  possible  activities  of  Czerniawski. 

"With  the  death  threat,  Czerniawski  without  warning  landed  a 
blow  to  the  jaw  of  the  Herald  editor.  Printed  alongside  this  article 
is  a  voter's  affidavit  of  registration  by  Czerniawski  into  the  Inde- 
pendent Progressive  Party. 

1 '  The  Herald  takes  the  dare  this  week  to  print  some  inside  infor- 
mation about  this  improvement  association  official  who  for  some 
reason  will  provoke  violence  if  an  inquiry  is  made  about  him.  Mr. 
Czerniawski  opened  himself  to  inquiry  when  he  took  an  active  part 
in  the  school  affairs  of  this  community ;  when  he  told  the  improve- 
ment association  that  'we  have  got  to  meet  secretly  or  the  opposi- 
tion will  disrupt  our  meeting';  when  he  warned  a  free  American 
newspaper  of  the  results  if  there  was  any  further  investigating. 
Does  that  warning  apply  also  to  any  other  citizens  of  the  com- 
munity who  dare  question  this  man  in  the  improvement  associa- 
tion? Czerniawski  holds  position  of  assistant  membership  chair- 
man of  the  improvement  association. 

' '  We  are  printing  this  above  editor 's  note  and  the  following  data 
on  the  Independent  Progressive  Party,  of  which  Czerniawski  was 
a  member  as  we  would  if  we  found  strange  affiliations  with  any 
public  official. 

"We  believe  that  the  schoolroom  is  a  sensitive  area  wherein  the 
minds  are  shaped  toward  the  society  in  which  we  live.  There  is 
vital  concern  here,  for  we  must  preserve  the  integrity  of  the 
schools. 

"The  teachers  and  the  officials  maintain  this  integrity  and  the 
fact  that  they  are  entrusted  with  this  duty  gives  a  very  proper 
right  of  inquiry  into  the  organizations  and  persons  with  whom 
they  associate. 

"Likewise,  citizenry  who  organize  to  'advise'  our  schools,  no 
doubt  exerting  pressure  here  and  there,  should  also  submit  to  in- 
quiry as  to  associations  of  its  members.  From  time  immemorial, 
one's  reputation  has  been  determined  in  part  by  the  company  he 
keeps. 

"Many  good  Americans  have  lost  sight  of  vitally  important 
questions  in  today's  election.  This  has  been  brought  about  in  agi- 


UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

tations  that  have  in  all  too  many  eases  greatly  confused  persons 
unwary  of  deceit,  either  knowingly  or  unknowingly. 

"We  do  not  know  what  the  present  political  affiliations  of  this 
person  are.  "We  are  not  making  any  insinuations  that  he  is  of  any 
particular  belief  but  only  presenting  evidence  and  presenting 
comments  of  the  State  Committee  on  Un-American  Activities  in 
reference  to  the  Independent  Progressive  Party.  A.  Czerniawski 
registered  in  1948  into  the  Independent  Progressive  Party  and 
following  is  the  report  of  that  committee  on  the  IPP. 

"The  Un-American  Activities  Committee  made  the  following 
statement  of  fact  concerning  un-American  organizations  including 
the  Independent  Progressive  Party.  This  data  is  taken  from  the 
Fourth  Report  of  the  Un-American  Activities  in  California, 
page  62. 

"  'Communists  have  no  more  use  for  parliamentary  govern- 
ment than  they  have  for  capitalism.  They  seek  to  destroy  both. 
The  one  basic  goal  of  Communism  is  to  eliminate  capitalism  and 
its  parliamentary  government,  and  replace  them  with  a  brutal, 
totalitarian  police  state  under  the  dictatorship  of  the  proletariat.' 

"Wherever  Red  Fascism  has  snuffed  out  liberty  and  freedom, 
the  first  things  to  go  were  civil  rights,  capitalism  and  parliamen- 
tary government.  Just  as  the  Communists  in  America  sneeringly 
and  cynically  take  advantage  of  our  freedoms  and  liberties,  so  do 
they  pervert  and  corrupt  our  political  and  legislative  process  wher- 


"  'The  committee  (on  Un-American  Activities  in  California) 
has  discovered  and  reported  repeatedly,  that  the  Communists 
work  incessantly  to  pervert  and  destroy  every  institution  that 
does  not  fit  into  their  pattern  of  revolutionary  conspiracy.  No- 
where has  this  Communist  strategy  been  pursued  more  consist- 
ently and  relentlessly  than  in  the  fields  of  politics  and  legislation. 

"  'The  most  recent  consolidation  of  this  Communist  program 
of  legislative  and  political  activity  through  front  organizations, 
has  been  the  recent  coalition  of  a  series  of  Communist  front 
organizations  under  the  banner  of  the  Third  Party  Movement  to 
elect  Henry  Wallace  President  of  the  United  States. 

"  'In  California,  the  basic  Communist  front  organizations  in 
this  coalition  are  the  Progressive  Citizens  of  America,  Independ- 
ent Progessive  Party,  California  Legislative  Conference,  Com- 
munist-controlled trade  unions  in  the  C.  I.  0.,  the  "Wallace 
Democrats"  caucus  in  the  Democratic  Party,  Progressive  A.  F. 
of  L.,  and  a  student  movement  for  Wallace,  sponsored  by  Ameri- 
can Youth  for  Democracy. 


UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES   IN   CALIFORNIA  5 

"  'Behind  a  facade  of  specious  promises  of  "peace,  progress 
and  prosperity,"  the  Third  Party  movement  has  proceeded  with 
mechanical  precision,  following  every  twist  and  turn  of  the 
Communist  Party  line  on  foreign  affairs  and  domestic  issues. 

"  '  It  has  conducted  its  activities  in  such  a  manner  as  to  stamp 
itself  as  an  American  tool  of  the  international  Communist  con- 
spiracy. Its  policies,  tactics  and  appeals  fit  the  specifications  for 
every  type  of  Communist  front  organization  described  and  classi- 
fied in  the  entire  report  of  this  committee,  and  it  follows  the 
party  ' '  line ' '  meticulously. 

"  'The  Third  Party  movement  to  elect  Henry  Wallace  is  the 
creature  of  the  Community  Party.  Its  policies,  programs,  organi- 
zation, structure,  public  relations,  personnel  and  directing  lead- 
ership have  all  followed  and  now  follow  the  Communist  Party 
pattern  with  unbroken  monotony.  Its  key  personnel  are  known 
Communists,  fellow-travelers  and  veteran  apologists  for  Soviet 
Russia  and  American  Communism. 

"  'Hugh  Bryson,  state  chairman  of  the  Independent  Progres- 
sive Party  in  California,  is  a  Communist  and  a  veteran  of  Com- 
munist conspiratorial  activity  in  the  Marine  Cooks  and  Stewards 
Union,  C.  I.  0.'" 

Elsewhere  in  the  same  issue  of  the  newspaper,  this  item  appeared : 

"An  altercation  last  week  between  Albion  Czerniawski  and  L.  W. 
Thomas,  Herald  editor,  has  called  for  a  clarification  of  the  affair. 

"Czerniawski  came  upon  the  Herald  editor  in  Paysan's  Sundries, 
voiced  his  objections  of  the  Herald  investigating  his  past.  Czerniaw- 
ski, who  is  proprietor  of  the  A-C  Hardware,  told  the  newsman  that 
he  felt  mad  enough  to  kill  him  and  without  warning  landed  a  blow 
to  the  publisher's  jaw.  Czerniawski  then  stepped  back  and  threat- 
ened to  kill  the  editor  if  the  investigation  was  continued. 

"The  Herald,  this  week,  is  printing  on  page  3  a  certain  amount 
of  information  relative  to  subversive  organizations.  Also  a  photo- 
static copy  of  a  document  signed  by  Czerniawski. 

"Even  though  there  are  some  papers  which  consider  it  bad  taste 
to  mention  the  word  Communist  Party,  we  are  carrying  on  page  3 
of  this  issue  comments  of  a  state  senatorial  committee. 

"Mr.  Czerniawski 's  murder  threat  to  the  Herald  editor  is  added 
reason  to  shed  a  little  light  on  the  subject  in  order  to  prove  the 
integrity  of  the  paper  which  Czerniawski  may  have  placed  in 
question. 

"This  paper  has  its  choice  of  either  knuckling  down  under  this 
influential  improvement  association  member,  or  take  the  challenge. 
The  Westminster  Herald  does  not  compromise  with  threats. 


6  UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

"This  paper  has  before  been  under  attack  for  its  freedom  of  the 
press  by  Czerniawski  and  his  improvement  association,  who  have 
attempted  to  stifle  the  press  in  such  manner  as  to  try  to  bring  suit, 
force  arrest  of  reporters  for  so-called  covering  'public'  meetings 
and  has  tried  to  confiscate  film  and  records,  without  success. 

"Czerniawski  is  assistant  membership  chairman  of  the  School 
Improvement  Association  according  to  the  "West  Orange  County 
News  and  his  membership  headquarters  is  in  his  store. ' ' 

Photostatic  document  reprinted  in  the  Westminster  Herald,  which  also 
carried  the  articles  above  quoted,  was  executed  in  Orange  County  on 
September  13,  1948,  signed  by  Albin  Czerniawski,  14151  Locust  Street, 
Westminster,  and  was  numbered  278328.  He  switched  his  political  affil- 
iation to  the  Democratic  Party  on  September  7,  1950.  As  will  be  seen, 
there  was  some  confusion  concerning  the  exact  language  exchanged 
between  the  two  men  in  the  Westminster  pharmacy  immediately  pre- 
ceding the  event  described  by  Mr.  Thomas.  There  is  no  question  about 
his  being  struck  in  the  face  by  Czerniawski,  but  here,  too,  the  record 
becomes  somewhat  cloudy;  Thomas  describes  the  blow  as  "a  punch  in 
the  jaw,"  and  Czerniawski  as  "a  slap  in  the  face." 

These  matters  are  mentioned  and  the  articles  are  cited  to  indicate  the 
feeling  that  existed  between  the  two  principals.  As  local  partisans  took 
sides,  the  feeling  naturally  increased  and  since  the  population  of 
Westminster  is  only  about  1500,  the  newspaper  publicity  and  the  close 
personal  contact  between  the  inhabitants  in  this  community  resulted 
in  a  situation  whereby  almost  everyone  had  become  interested  in  the 
matter  in  one  way  or  another  by  the  time  our  public  hearing  opened 
on  July  28,  1954. 

The  committee  had  been  requested  to  hold  an  open  hearing  in  April 
or  May,  but  discovered  that  a  local  school  board  election  had  been  set 
for  May  21st,  and,  therefore,  refused  to  hold  any  hearing  or  issue 
any  statement  until  after  the  election  had  been  held.  We  quote  liberally 
from  the  transcript  of  the  public  hearing,  together  with  documents 
submitted  by  the  respective  parties,  in  the  hope  that  the  situation  will 
thereby  be  settled  and  the  local  tensions  relaxed. 

PUBLIC   HEARING,  LOS  ANGELES,  CALIFORNIA 
JULY  28,    1954 

Several  days  prior  to  the  beginning  of  the  committee's  inquiry  into 
the  Westminster  matter,  it  had  been  listening  to  witnesses  in  a  public 
hearing  held  in  Koom  115,  California  State  Building,  Los  Angeles, 
California.  At  the  conclusion  of  the  other  matters  on  the  committee's 
program,  it  concluded  by  taking  testimony  from  the  witnesses  from 


UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  ( 

Westminster,  and  in  that  connection  the  following  introductory  state- 
ment was  made. 

"Mr.  Combs:  The  next  matter  on  the  agenda,  Mr.  Chairman,  is 
the  Westminster  matter,  which  is  in  an  entirely  separate  category 
from  the  evidence  which  has  been  adduced  before  the  committee 
up  to  this  point.  There  were  two  or  three  witnesses  that  we  ex- 
pected to  be  here  yesterday,  but  who  were  unable  to  attend,  one 
by  reason  of  illness  and  two  by  reason  of  the  fact  that  they  were 
not  in  the  city.  This  last  phase  of  the  hearing  will  deal  solely  with 
the  Westminster  situation.  As  the  chairman  is  aware,  the  com- 
mittee began  three  or  four  or  five  months  ago  to  receive  letters 
and  telephone  calls  from  people  residing  in  the  Westminster  area, 
charging  that  there  were  subversive  influences  that  were  having 
an  adverse  effect  on  the  educational  system  and  on  the  general 
community  atmosphere  in  the  Westminster  area  and  immediate 
vicinity.  The  committee  intended  to  go  into  the  matter  at  an 
earlier  date,  but  discovered  that  there  was  some  kind  of  a  local 
election  in  the  city  of  Westminster,  or  in  the  school  district,  I  am 
not  clear  which,  and  followed  its  consistent  policy  of  staying  out 
of  any  community  political  matters  and  therefore  deferred  the 
hearing  until  this  time  so  that  we  would  not  intrude  in  the  local 
political  matters.  An  election  was  held  in  May,  and  while  this 
subject  is  a  little  out  of  context  of  the  hearing  that  has  been 
conducted  up  to  this  point — I  have  talked  to  the  people  that  I 
consider  to  be  the  principal  witnesses  on  either  side  and  told  them 
if  they  preferred  to  have  this  hearing  in  executive  session  the 
committee  would  be  happy  to  accommodate  them.  They  both  ex- 
pressed a  desire  to  have  the  committee  hear  the  entire  matter 
in  open  session.  I  wish  to  make  it  very  clear  to  everyone  here  that 
the  committee  regards  this  as  an  exploratory  hearing.  It  has 
sent  no  investigators  into  the  Westminster  area.  The  committee 
believed  it  would  be  most  helpful  if  the  leading  actors  on  both 
sides  came  before  the  committee  and  testified  under  oath,  and 
perhaps  no  further  action  will  have  to  be  taken.  The  committee's 
only  jurisdiction  is  in  connection  with  the  alleged  subversive 
matters.  It  has  no  jurisdiction  to  go  into  local  political  matters, 
or  in  the  way  the  schools  are  conducted  or  with  regard  to  the 
personalities  on  the  school  board,  unless  some  subversive  element 
is  involved. 

"With  that,  Mr.  Chairman,  I  would  like  to  call  to  the  stand 
Mr.  Albin  Czerniawski. " 

Mr.    Czerniawski    testified    that    he    resided    at    7181    Westminster 
Avenue,   in   Westminster,    California,   and   had   resided   in    that    city 


8  UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

continuously  since  1947.  He  stated  that  he  was  born  in  Canada  and 
came  to  the  United  States  by  way  of  Detroit,  Michigan,  in  1924,  and 
became  a  naturalized  American  citizen  in  February,  1930.  He  had 
resided  in  Long  Beach  during  part  of  1947  at  2316  Caspian  Avenue, 
and  in  1950  had  resided  at  1451  Locust  Street  in  the  city  of  West- 
minster. 

Regarding  his  affiliation  in  a  Communist  front  organization  known 
as  the  International  Workers  Order,  Mr.  Czerniawski  testified  as 
follows : 

Question  by  Mr.  Combs :  Mr.  Czerniawski,  did  you  ever  hear 
of  an  organization  known  as  the  International  Workers  Orderf 
''  Answer :  Yes,  sir. 

Q.  Were  you  ever  affiliated  with  that  organization? 
:A.  Yes,  sir. 

Q.  Or  any  of  its  branches? 
A.  Yes,  sir. 

Q.  At  what  period  of  time? 

A.  From  1936,  right  after  the  depression.  I  was  out  of  work 
for  a  long  time.  As  soon  as  I  got  back  to  work — during  the  depres- 
sion I  had  lost  all  of  my  insurance.  I  didn't  carry  any  insurance 
for  myself  or  the  family.  Our  insurance  agent  came  to  the  door 
and  solicited  insurance.  He  told  me  what  the  rates  were.  It  sounded 
very  reasonable  so  I  signed  up.  It  was  the  International  Workers 
Order.  Tt  was  the  Polish  branch  of  the  International  Workers 
Order. 

"Q.  As  a  matter  of  fact,  the  International  Workers  Order  is 
composed  of  what  they  call  lodges,  isn  't  it  ? 
"A.  That  is  right.  It  is  a  fraternal  order. 
"Q.  It  is  composed  of  a  group  of  various  racial  lodges? 
"A.  That  is  right. 

"Q.  Including  of  course  Americans? 
"A.  That  is  right. 

"Q.  They  have  units  of  their  organization  all  over  the  United 
States  ? 
"A.  That  is  right. 
"Q.  Go  ahead. 

"A.  After  I  became  a  member  I  attended  meetings  maybe  two 
or  three  times  a  year. 

"Q.  Where  were  the  meetings  held? 
"A.  At  individual  homes  of  the  members. 
"Q.  At  residences? 
"A.  At  residences,  that  is  right. 

' '  Q.  These  meetings  that  were  held  at  the  residences  were  in  the 
immediate  vicinity  of  the  area  where  you  lived  ? 


UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES   IN   CALIFORNIA  9 

A.  That  is  right. 

Q.  So  that  it  was  convenient  to  attend? 
A.  That  is  right. 

Q.  These  people  were  friends  of  yours? 
A.  No,  not  particularly.  They  were  no  friends  of  mine. 
Q.  Did  they  become  friends  of  yours  as  a  result  of  attending 
the  meetings? 

A.  Acquaintances. 
;  Q.  All  right. 

'A.  I  can  truthfully  say  that  at  no  time  during  any  of  those 
meetings  was  anything  said  against  our  Country,  anything  deroga- 
tory against  our  Country.  After  the  second  World  War,  our  main 
purpose  was  to  raise  funds  to  help  the  orphans  and  widows  in 
Poland  because  Poland  was  destroyed.  The  biggest  percent  of 
Poland  was  destroyed. 

' '  Q.  Do  you  have  any  relatives  presently  residing  in  Poland  ? 
' '  A.  I  don 't  know  of  any,  but  I  probably  have  because  my  folks 
came  from  there.  In  fact,  they  raised  funds  to  buy  farm  machinery, 
farm  tools,  horses,  and  so  forth.  In  fact  I  donated  a  hundred  dollars 
toward  the  purchase  of  a  horse  in  this  Country,  to  ship  a  work 
horse  to  Poland. 

"Q.  When  was  that? 
"A.  That  was  four  or  five  years  ago. 
"Q.  Four  or  five  years  ago? 

"A.  Right  after  this  World  War,  right  after  the  war,  about  104S. 
"Q.  About  1948? 
"A.  Something  like  that. 
"Q.  All  right. 

"A.  Now  I  understand  that  organization  is  nonexistent. 
"Q.  That  is,  the  International  Workers  Order? 
"A.  That  is  right.  It  is  nonexistent.  The  New  York  State  Insur- 
ance Board  has  taken  it  over. 

"Q.  The  New  York  State  Insurance  Board  has  taken  it  over? 
"A.  That  is  right.  It  has  disbanded. 

"Q.  How  did  you  gain  that  information,  Mr.  Czerniawski? 
"A.  Well,  I  was  sent  that  information  from  New  York.  Now  ! 
pay  my  insurance  to  the  State  of  New  York. 

"Q.  You  pay  your  I.  W.  0.  insurance  premiums  to  the  State  of 
New  York? 

"A.  That  is  right. 

"Q.  To  the  Insurance  Commissioner  in  New  York? 

"A.  Something  like  that. 

"Q.  He  is  the  custodian  of  the  I.  W.  0.  in  New  York  ? 

"A.  I  guess  that  is  it.  I  don't  know  too  much  about  it. 


10  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

"Q.  The  head  office  of  the  International  Workers  Order  was  in 
New  York,  wasn  't  it  ? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  So  it  would  have  jurisdiction  over  all  of  the  subordinate 
units  of  the  organizations  throughout  the  Country  ? 

"A.  I  suppose  it  would. 

"Q.  You  don't  know  that? 

"A.  No. 

' '  Q.  You  affiliated  with  that  organization  how  long  ago  ? 

"A.  1936. 

' '  Q.  Your  membership  actually  continues  until  the  present  time  ? 

"A.  That  is  right,  sir. 

"Q.  With  the  exception  that  you  just  pay  your  premiums  to  the 
New  York  Insurance  Commissioner? 

' '  A.  That  is  right.  He  sent  me  a  bill  and  I  sent  a  check. 

"Q.  But  you  never  resigned  from  it  or  anything  like  that? 

"A.  No,  I  haven't. 

"Q.  You  have  never  been  expelled? 

"A.  No. 

"Q.  Do  you  still  attend  any  meetings  of  the  organization? 

"A.  Never. 

"Q.  Do  you  still  maintain  social  contacts  with  the  persons  who 
were  members  and  at  whose  homes  you  attended  meetings? 

"A.  No,  sir.  For  that  matter  I  haven't  seen  any  of  the  members 
for  years,  several  years. 

"Q.  So  you  don't  know  whether  they  still  belong  or  whether  they 
are  in  the  same  category  as  you  are  or  not  ? 

' '  A.  That  is  right.  However  I  could  name  several  other  organiza- 
tions I  belong  to  also. 

"Q.  Let  me  ask  a  few  more  questions  and  after  I  have  finished 
you  can  give  us  any  organizational  data  you  wish. 

"A.  Fine. 

"Q.  Were  you  affiliated  from  1947  until  1952  or  thereabouts 
with  an  organization  known  as  the  American  Polish  Society? 

"A.  No.  I  never  heard  of  that  organization. 

"Q.  You  don't  know  anything  about  that  at  all? 

"A.  Not  that  society. 

11 Q.  Do  you  know  of  a  publication  called  The  Daily  People's  World? 

"A.  I  have  heard  of  it,  yes. 

"Q.  Did  you  ever  subscribe  to  it? 

"A.  The  Daily  People's  World — I  think  I  did  for  a  six-month 
period  in  1946, 1  believe. 

"Q.  In  1946? 

"A.  Yes,  sir. 


UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES   IN   CALIFORNIA  11 

' '  Q.  For  six  months  ? 

"A.  Yes.  It  was  a  dollar.  They  asked  for  a  dollar  and  they  sent 
the  publication  for  six  months. 

"Q.  Did  you  subscribe  to  that  through  your  contacts  with  the 
International  Workers  Order ? 

"A.  No.  Someone  in  the  particular  neighborhood  came  up  to  my 
place  of  business  and  asked  me. 

"Q.  That  was  when  you  were  residing  where? 

"A.  One  of  my  customers  in  Long  Beach. 

"Q.  Did  you  yourself  ever  sell  any  subscriptions  to  the  paper 
or  persuade  anyone  to  subscribe  to  it  ? 

"A.  Never. 

"Q.  You  never  did? 

"A.  Never. 

"  Q.  You  took  it  you  say  for  six  months  ? 

"A.  Yes. 

' '  Q.  Why  did  you  cease  taking  it  ? 

"A.  I  wasn't  interested.  There  was  nothing  in  it  to  interest  me. 

"Q.  Did  you  know  anything  about  its  political  character? 

"A.  What  is  that? 

"Q.  The  political  nature  of  the  Daily  People's  World? 

"A.  Yes.  I  don't  know  that  I  can  define  it  properly.  It — 

' '  Q.  Was  it  an  anti-Communist  paper  ? 

1 '  A.  No,  I  wouldn  't  say  that. 

"  Q.  Was  it  opposed  to  Communism  ? 

"A.  No,  I  wouldn't  say  it  was  opposed  to  Communism. 

' '  Q.  In  other  words,  it  seemed  like  there  was  nothing  derogatory 
against  our  country  there  ? 

"A.  No. 

' '  Q.  It  was  just  a  run-of-the-mill  paper  ? 

"A.  That's  the  way  I  took  it. 

"Q.  Did  it  seem  to  you  to  be  fair  and  objective  in  its  reporting? 

"A.  Well,  I  didn't  study  it  enough. 

' '  Q.  You  did  not  read  it  very  closely  ? 

"A.  No,  sir.  I  was  busy  many  times  it  came  in  and  it  wound  up 
in  the  wastebasket. 

"Q.  You  threw  it  in  the  wastebasket? 

"A.  That's  right. 

"Q.  But  did  you  read  it  enough  to  form  an  opinion  that  it 
apparently  was  a  run-of-the-mill  newspaper? 

"A.  Well,  I  read  the  headlines  in  it,  but  that  is  about  as  far 
as  it  went. 

"Q.  You  just  read  the  headlines? 

"A.  Yes. 


12  UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

"Q.  I  think  you  could  probably  form  a  pretty  good  opinion 
from  reading  the  headlines. 

"A.  Yes,  I  could. 

"Q.  And  you  did? 

"A.  Well,  like  I  told  you,  there  was  nothing  there  that  would 
interest  me. 

' '  Q.  But  you  also  testified  I  think  that  you  found  nothing  derog- 
atory in  it. 

"A.  That's  right,  as  much  as  I  read. 

"Q.  Did  you  ever  notice  any  mention  in  the  paper  of  the  Soviet 
Union  or  the  countries  behind  the  Iron  Curtain,  including  Poland  ? 

"  A.  I  don 't  believe  I  did. 

' '  Q.  You  don 't  believe  you  ever  saw  any  mention  of  them  ? 

"A.  No. 

"Q.  Did  you  ever  hear  of  a  publication  called  In  Fact,  a  maga- 
zine? 

"A.  Yes. 

' '  Q.  And  did  you  ever  subscribe  to  that  ? 

"A.I  did,  sir. 

"  Q.  "Where  were  you  living  then  ? 

"A.I  lived  in  Westminster. 

"  Q.  So  that  would  be  after  1947  ? 

"A.  That's  right. 

"Q.  How  did  you  happen  to  subscribe  to  that,  Mr.  Czerniawski? 

"A.  Some  party  asked  me  to  donate  a  dollar  to  subscribe  to 
t  he  publication. 

"  Q.  Do  you  remember  who  that  person  was  ? 

"A.  I  don't  believe  I  do. 

"  Q.  Was  it  a  neighbor  of  yours  ? 

"A.  No,  it  was  not  a  neighbor.  It  was  a  party  who  lived,  I  be- 
lieve, in  Huntington  Beach  somewhere. 

' '  Q.  Someone  who  lived  in  Huntington  Beach  ? 

"A.  That's  right,  when  I  joined  the  Progressive  Party. 

"Q.  The  Independent  Progressive  Party? 

"A.  The  Independent  Progressive  Party.  That  was  when  they 
contacted  me. 

"Q.  When  did  you  join  the  Independent  Progressive  Party? 

"A.  Well,  when  Henry  Wallace  was  running  for  President,  I 
guess. 

"  Q.  You  were  living  where  then  ? 

"A.  Westminster. 

"Q.  After  you  joined  did  somebody  come  to  see  you  who  was 
a  member  of  the  Independent  Progressive  Party? 

"A.  I  suppose  so. 


UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES   IN    CALIFORNIA  13 

' '  Q.  And  asked  you  to  subscribe  to  In  Fact? 

"A.  Yes,  sir. 

' '  Q.  Which  you  did  for  a  dollar  ? 

"A.  Yes,  sir. 

"Q.  Who  was  the  editor  for  that  publication,  if  you  know? 

"A.  I  don't  remember. 

' '  Q.  Was  it  a  man  named  Seldes  ? 

"A.  That  sounds  familiar. 

"Q.  George  Seldes? 

"A.  It  sounds  familiar,  but  I  am  not  quite  sure. 

"  Q.  Did  you  read  that  magazine  at  all  ? 

"A.  Very  seldom.  I  threw  it  in  the  wastebasket. 

' '  Q.  You  threw  it  in  the  wastebasket,  too  ? 

"A.  That  is  right.  The  reason  I  subscribed  to  these  different 
ones,  since  I  am  in  business  I  thought  it  would  be  advantageous 
as  far  as  advertising  is  concerned,  you  know. 

"  Q.  Advertising  in  the  magazine  do  you  mean  ? 

"A.  No.  It  would  be  good  business  when  a  customer  asked  me 
to  donate  or  subscribe  to  something  I  generaly  did. 

"Q.  Was  the  person  who  asked  you  to  subscribe  to  the  People's 
World  one  of  your  customers  ?  • 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  The  person  who  asked  you  to  subscribe  to  In  Fact  was  one  of 
your  customers  ? 

"A.  That  is  right. 

"Q.  Had  you  known  either  of  them  in  the  International  Work- 
ers Order? 

"  A.  No. 

' '  Q.  But  the  second  one  you  believed  you  had  some  contact  with 
through  the  Independent  Progressive  Party? 

"A.  It  must  have  been  because  they  got  my  name  from  the  list 
somehow,  from  the  registration  list. 

"Q.  I  show  you  a  photostatic  copy  of  a  document  which  pur- 
ports to  be  an  affidavit  of  registration  and  ask  you  if  that  is  a  cor- 
rect facsimile  of  your  signature,  Mr.  Czerniawski  ? 

"A.  It  is,  sir.  I  have  seen  it  before. 

"Q.  Of  course,  you  signed  the  original,  did  you  not? 

"A.  That  is  right. 

"Q.  Mr.  Czerniawski,  did  anybody  ever  solicit  you  to  become 
a  member  of  the  Communist  Party,  ask  you  to  join  at  any  time? 

"A.  No,  sir.  I  never  would  join. 

1 '  Q.  You  never  joined  the  Communist  Party  ? 

"A.  No,  and  I  would  never  have  joined  if  they  asked  me. 

' '  Q.  You  never  did  join  ? 


14  UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

"A.  I  never  did  join. 

"Q.  Have  you  ever  been  a  member  of  the  Communist  Political 
Association? 

"A.  I  should  say  not. 

"Q.  Which  was  another  name  for  the  Communist  Party.  Have 
you  ever  been  a  member  of  any  Communist  front  organization  ? 

"A.  Not  that  I  know  of. 

"  Q.  Not  that  you  know  of  ? 

"A.  No,  sir. 

"Q.  Did  you  know  that  the  International  Workers  Order  was 
designated  by  the  United  States  Department  of  Justice  as  a  Com- 
munist front  ? 

"A.  No,  sir,  I  didn't. 

"Q.  Did  you  know  that  the  Insurance  Commissioner  in  the  State 
of  New  York  brought  a  lawsuit  to  prevent  the  organization  from 
doing  business  on  the  ground  that  it  was  a  Communist  front  and 
that  the  courts  held  that  it  was  a  Communist  front  ? 

"A.  That  I  didn't  know.  I  was  not  posted  on  it  and  I  was  not 
interested.  I  was  busy  working. 

' '  Q.  Did  you  know  that  the  publication  In  Fact  had  been  charac- 
terized as  a  pro-Communist  publication  and  is  now  no  longer  pub- 
lished ? 

"A.  That  I  didn't  know  either. 

"Q.  Did  you  know  that  the  Daily  People's  World  is  the  propa- 
ganda organ  for  the  Communist  Party  of  California  ? 

"A.  It  probably  is,  but  I  am  not  too  well  informed  on  that, 
either. 

"  Q.  When  you  say  'probably, '  what  do  you  mean  1 

"A.  Well,  as  you  have  mentioned,  that  it  is — it  probably  is.  I 
don 't  know. 

"Q.  How  long  did  your  affiliation  with  the  Independent  Pro- 
gressive Party  continue  ? 

' '  A.  Just  for  that  one  election. 

"  Q.  It  ceased  thereafter  ? 

"A.  That's  right.  I  am  a  Democrat.  I  always  have  been,  and 
I  went  back  to  the  Democratic  Party,  but  I  felt  at  that  particular 
time  that  Wallace  would  have  been  a  better  man. 

"Q.  The  only  reason  we  asked  about  the  Independent  Progres- 
sive Party  is  that  it  has  been  characterized  not  as  being  a  Commu- 
nist organization,  but  as  being  dominated  by  Communists  at 
the  top. 

"A.  I  see. 

"Q.  There  is  some  evidence,  some  of  it  before  this  committee, 
that  the  head  of  it  in  California,  Hugh  Bryson,  chairman  of  the 


UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  15 

Marine  Cooks  and  Stewards  Union  in  San  Francisco,  is  a  Com- 
munist Party  member.  Obviously  the  committee  is  interested  in 
that,  while  it  is  not  interested  in  the  other  political  parties  toward 
which  no  such  accusation  has  been  mentioned  to  my  knowledge. 

"A.  That  is  the  reason  I  joined  the  Independent  Progressive 
Party. 

"Q.  Mr.  Czerniawski,  will  you  please  describe  the  organization 
in  Westminster  if  you  know  anything  about  it  ?  By  the  way,  do  you 
still  reside  there  ? 

"A.  Yes,  I  do. 

"  Q.  You  are  in  the  paint  business  there  ? 

"A.  I  am  in  the  hardware  business. 

"Q.  Do  you  know  of  an  organization  known  as  the  Tri-City 
Advisory  Committee,  are  you  familiar  with  that  at  all? 

"A.  No,  sir,  I  am  not. 

"  Q.  You  know  nothing  about  it  whatsoever  ? 

' '  A.  No,  sir,  not  a  thing. 

"Q.  Do  you  know  anything  about  an  organization  known  as 
the  School  Improvement  Association? 

"A.  Yes,  I  do. 

"Q.  "Would  you  mind  describing  in  your  own  way  to  the  com- 
mittee what  that  is  and  how  it  started  ? 

"A.  I  will  give  you  what  I  know  about  it.  I  will  tell  you  what  I 
know  about  it.  When  the  organization  was  formed  I  was  asked  to 
join.  They  told  me  what  it  was  for.  The  school  board  at  that  time 
was  going  to  float  a  big  state  loan. 

"Q.  It  was  interested  in  school  matters? 

"A.  It  was  interested  in  school  matters,  that  is  right.  They  were 
going  to  float  a  big  bond  issue  for  new  schools.  We  didn't  need 
them  at  the  present  time.  It  would  have  affected  our  tax  rates.  I 
am  a  taxpayer,  therefore  I  joined. 

"Q.  The  organization  was  already  in  operation  when  you  were 
asked  to  join  it? 

' '  A.  That  is  right. 

"Q.  Do  you  know  who  was  instrumental  in  starting  it,  or  how 
long  it  had  been  in  existence  ? 

"A.  I  am  not  quite  sure.  Mr.  Leonard  Fry  was  the  chairman 
of  the  organization.  He  asked  me  to  join. 

"Q.  Is  he  here  today  ? 

' '  A.  No.  He  had  to  work. 

' '  Q.  That  was  the  School  Improvement  Association,  was  it  ? 

' '  A.  That  is  right. 

' '  Q.  Do  you  know  a  man  by  the  name  of  Lyle  Richards  ? 

' '  A.  Yes,  sir. 


16  UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

"  Q.  Is  he  here  today  ? 

' '  A.  No,  sir. 

"Q.  Does  the  School  Improvement  Association  still  exist? 

' '  A.  Yes,  sir,  as  far  as  I  know  it  does. 

"Q.  Of  what  does  its  membership  consist?  Is  it  limited  to  the 
City  of  Westminster  or  is  it  spread  over  a  larger  area  ? 

"A.  It  is  limited  to  the  Westminster  School  District. 

"  Q.  Westminster  is  in  Orange  County  ? 

' '  A.  Yes,  sir. 

' '  Q.  Where  is  it  located  with  reference  to  the  county  seat  ? 

"A.  Santa  Ana  I  understand  is  the  county  seat. 

"Q.  Yes. 

"A.  It  is  west  of  Santa  Ana. 

"Q.  How  far? 

' '  A.  About  seven  or  eight  miles. 

"Q.  You  say  the  membership  comprises  people  extending 
how  far  ? 

' '  A.  The  Westminster  School  District. 

"Q.  Does  that  include  other  cities  in  addition  to  Westminster? 

"A.  I  don't  believe  so. 

"  Q.  You  don 't  believe  so  ? 

"A.  No. 

' '  Q.  Did  you  attend  meetings  of  this  organization  ? 

' '  A.  You  said  other  cities  ? 

"Q.  Yes. 

"A.  I  don't  know  how  you  would  define  it.  I  said  Westminster 
School  District,  It  comprises  Westminster,  Barber  City,  Midway 
City  and  Sun  Gardens,  which  are  little  county  communities,  but 
they  are  in  the  Westminster  School  District. 

"Q.  That  explains  it.  In  connection  with  your  membership  and 
participation  in  this  organization,  the  School  Improvement  Associ- 
ation, have  you  been  accused  of  being  a  Communist  or  belonging 
to  a  subversive  organization  ? 

"A.  I  have,  sir. 

"  Q.  When  did  that  sort  of  activity  originate  ? 

"A.  Well,  it  originated  four  or  five  years  ago,  but  I  tried  to 
run  it  down.  I  have  tried  every  possible  way  to  run  it  down.  How- 
ever, I  could  not.  It  was  one  of  these  whispering  campaigns. 

' '  Q.  Had  you  had  similar  experience  before  that  time  ? 

"A.  No,  sir. 

"Q.  While  you  were  a  member  of  the  International  Workers 
Order? 

' '  A.  No,  sir. 


UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  17 

"  Q.  Did  anyone  accuse  you  of  belonging  to  a  Communist  domi- 
nated organization  ? 

"A.  No,  sir.  Then  I  went  to  the  FBI  in  Santa  Ana  and  told 
them  that  I  was  in  business  in  "Westminster,  that  I  was  a  business- 
man there,  that  there  was  a  rumor  going  around,  a  whispering 
campaign,  that  I  was  a  Communist. 

"  Q.  About  when  did  you  do  this  ? 

"A.  About  four  years  ago. 

"Q.  AU  right. 

"A.  I  told  them  that  if  I  was  a  Communist  they  would  know 
about  it,  and  I  knew  I  wasn't,  therefore  I  would  like  to  have  them 
give  me  a  clearance  of  some  kind  that  would  show  I  was  not  a 
Communist. 

"They  said,  'Mr.  Czerniawski,  we  are  not  authorized  to  give 
anyone  clearance.  If  you  were  a  Communist  it  would  be  none  of 
our  affair.  If  you  were  able  to  find  out  who  started  this  rumor 
then  they  would  be  subject  to  civil  suit ;  you  could  take  them  to  a 
civil  court.'  I  could  not  get  any  help  there,  and  I  started  asking 
people  about  it. 

"Q.  You  could  not  get  any  help  for  the  reasons  they  explained 
to  you  ? 

"A.  That  is  right. 

"Q.  They  said  they  were  not  permitted  by  law  to  issue  clear- 
ance? 

"A.  I  don't  know  what  the  law  was.  I  just  went  there. 

"Q.  I  understand,  but  it  was  the  natural  thing  to  do. 

"A.  I  asked  the  people  in  town  where  did  they  get  the  infor- 
mation. They  all  just  clammed  up  and  wouldn't  tell  me  the  start 
of  it  or  what.  So  it  went  on. 

"Q.  What  is  the  population  of  "Westminster,  roughly? 

"A.  I  believe  about  1,200,  somewhere  around  there. 

"Q.  Proceed. 

"A.  It  went  on  for  years  that  way  until  this  thing  came  up.  I 
have  a  statement  here  from  a  party  which  I  would  like  to  show  to 
you,  saying  that  I  was  called  a  Communist  by  a  certain  party 
(handing  document  to  counsel). 

"Mr.  Combs:  Let  the  record  show  that  the  witness  has  handed 
to  the  committee  a  hand  written  document  consisting  of  one  page, 
written  in  ink,  dated  the  26th  of  July,  1954. 

' '  The  Witness :  This  incident  happened  on  July  10th. 

' '  Mr.  Combs  :  Do  you  wish  up  to  read  this  into  the  record  ? 

' '  The  Witness :  Yes,  sir. 

"Mr.  Combs:  You  do? 

' '  The  Witness :  Yes,  sir. 


18  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

"Mr.  Combs:  It  reads  as  follows:  'To  Whom  it  May  Concern: 
This  is  to  certify  that  on  May  10,  1954  I  was  in  Paysan's  Drug 
Store  in  Yvrestminster  and  I  heard  a  man  call  Mr.  Czerniawski  a 
Communist.  Mr.  Czerniawski  slapped  him.  This  fellow  left  and  Mr. 
Czerniawski  apologized  to  Mrs.  Paysan.  F.  A.  Wood,  7/26/54, 
12362  Stanton  Avenue,  Garden  Grove.' 
' '  The  Witness :  Here  is  another  one. 

"Mr.  Combs:  Let  the  record  show  the  witness  handed  to  the 
committee  a  hand  written  document  consisting  of  a  folded  sheet  of 
about  a  page  and  three-quarters  which  contains  handwriting  in 
ink  and  in  pencil.  It  is  signed  by  Mrs.  Mary  Cleo  Hyans  of  2533 
Jackson  Street,  Dominguez,  Long  Beach  10,  California.  It  is  dated 
May  11,  1954.  Do  you  wish  us  to  read  this  into  the  record  also? 
"The  Witness:  Yes,  sir. 

"Mr.  Combs:  It  reads  as  follows:  'To  whom  it  May  Concern: 
On  April  30,  1954,  Mr.  Lloyd  Thomas  and  Mr.  Edwards  called  on 
me  and  led  me  to  believe  that  they  were  from  some  type  of  law 
enforcement  and  asked  me  about  Mr.  Albin  Czerniawski 's  political 
standing.  Also  asked  me  if  they  ever  had  meetings  in  their  home 
or  ever  had  company  and  what  they  talked  about.  Also  asked  me 
about  a  locksmith  who  came  to  the  store  to  see  Mr.  Czerniawski. 
I  worked  for  Mr.  Czerniawski  from  1940  to  1941,  about  18  months. 
I  want  to  say  I  never  worked  for  anyone  as  nice  and  thoughtful 
as  Mr.  and  Mrs.  Czerniawski,  and  new  knew  anyone  more  loyal  to 
the  U.  S.  A.  than  the  Czerniawski  family.  I  never  heard  them  ever 
say  anything  against  our  government  at  any  time.  Mr.  Thomas  also 
asked  me  about  their  social  life  here  in  Dominguez. ' 

"It  is  signed  by  Mrs.  Mary  Cleo  Hyans,  2533  Jackson  Street, 
Dominguez,  Long  Beach  10,  California. 
"How  many  more  do  you  have? 
"The  Witness:  There  aren't  very  many  more,  sir. 
"Mr.  Combs :  Let  the  record  show  the  witness  has  handed  to  the 
committee  a  single  paged  handwritten  document  in  pencil,  dated 
May  11,   1954,   signed  H.   Taylor,   addressed  To  Whom   it  May 
Concern. 

"  'Mr.  Lloyd  Thomas  and  his  partner  called  at  our  place  of 
business  and  questioned  us  about  the  background  of  one  Albin 
Czerniawski,  as  to  whom  his  friends  were  etc.  We  could  not  give 
them  very  much  information  concerning  Mr.  Czerniawski  as  we 
knew  nothing  derogatory  to  his  character,  either  political  or  other- 
wise. They  went  through  all  of  the  motions  of  taking  a  picture 
of  our  store.' 

"It  is  signed  by  H.  Taylor,  2652  Monroe  Street,  Dominguez. 
"The  Witness:  Here  is  another  one. 


UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  19 

' '  Mr.  Combs :  The  witness  submits  a  typed  document  dated  May 
13,  1954.  A  single  sheet  of  paper  addressed  to  Mr.  Albin  Czer- 
niawski,  Westminster,  California.  It  reads  as  follows: 

"  'Dear  Mr.  Czerniawski:  On  April  30  inst.  I  was  contacted 
by  two  gentlemen  who  tried  to  give  the  impression  they  were 
some  type  of  law  officials.  On  asking  for  identification  I  was 
handed  a  business  card  with  the  name  of  Lloyd  Thomas  of  the 
Westminster  Herald. 

"  'At  this  time  I  told  them  that  from  1939  to  1942  you  and 
your  family  had  been  residents  of  this  community;  conducted 
a  general  merchandise  business  here,  and  to  the  best  of  my  knowl- 
edge there  had  been  no  question  as  to  your  character  and  loyalty. 

"  'Both  my  wife  and  I  felt  that  you  and  Mrs.  Czerniawski 
were  hard  working  and  energetic  people  who  were  community 
and  civic  minded. 

"  'Sincerely,  (signed)  Walter  K.  Luck,  2672  Jackson,  Long 
Beach  10,  California.' 

' '  The  Witness :  Now,  here  is  one  from  a  local  man  where  I  live  in 
Westminster.  It  is  more  a  letter  of  what  my  character  is. 

"Mr.  Combs:  The  witness  has  handed  the  committee  a  document 
consisting  of  a  single  page  which  he  says  contains  a  statement  as 
to  his  character  certification.  Is  that  right? 
' '  The  Witness :  Yes,  sir. 

' '  Mr.  Combs :  Do  you  wish  me  to  read  it  into  the  record  ? 
' '  The  Witness :  Yes,  sir. 
' '  Mr.  Combs :  It  reads  as  follows : 

"  '1392  Cedar  Street,  Westminster,  California,  Tuesday,  July 
27,  1954. 

"  'To  Whom  it  May  Concern: 

"  'I  welcome  this  opportunity  to  make  a  very  definite  state- 
ment regarding  the  character  and  behavior  of  my  friend  and 
close  neighbor,  Albin  Czerniawski. 

"During  the  past  eight  years  there  have  been  but  few  days 
in  which  I  have  not  met,  talked,  associated  and  done  business 
with  him.  I  can  truthfully  say  that  on  each  and  every  occasion 
he  has  conducted  himself  and  his  business  in  a  clean,  public 
spirited  manner.  The  fact  that  he  registered  and  voted  the  Inde- 
pendent Progressive  ticket  in  a  recent  election  now  seems  to 
denote  a  subversive  character  by  a  certain  newspaper  publisher. 

"  'I  learned  today  that  my  friend  has  been  called  to  answer 
a  charge  that  he  is  subversive.  I  am  happy  that  we  live  in  a 
country  where  such  accusations  may  be  made  and  where  the 
accused  is  given  the  privilege  of  answering  the  charges.  I  trust 
his  answers  will  fully  exonerate  him  of  the  accusation. 


20  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

"  'Free  elections  (the  true  basis  of  our  democracy)  very 
correctly  air  the  character  of  the  candidates  for  election.  The 
will  of  the  majority  should  be  accepted  by  the  minority.  The 
very  fact  that  we  have  elections  whereby  we  elect  national,  state, 
county,  city — yes,  even  school  trustees,  is  an  acknowledgement 
that  our  present  laws  and  officials  are  not  perfect.  Otherwise 
we  would  write  the  word  finis  on  the  last  page  of  our  law  books 
and  the  officials  would  be  elected  for  life  terms.  If  the  minority 
in  some  of  our  school  elections  were  able  to  carry  their  defeat 
to  their  desired  ends  I  am  afraid  the  county  would  soon  become 
engaged  in  countless  little  civil  wars  and  rebellions. 

"  'Walter  R.Pope.' 
"Q.  Now,  Mr.  Czerniawski,  is  that  the  extent  of  the  documents 
you  wanted  to  read  ? 

"A.  Except  for  derogatory  statements  in  the  newspapers,  but 
they  are  quite  lengthy. 

"Q.  Obviously  we  cannot  read  all  these  things  into  the  record. 
If  you  wish  to  submit  them  to  us  we  will  be  happy  to  attach  them 
to  your  testimony.  If  you  want  to  submit  them  for  the  record,  you 
may  do  so. 

"A.  Yes,  I  will  do  that,  too. 

"Mr.  Combs:  Let  the  record  show  the  witness  has  handed  to 
the  committee  a  folder  containing  newspaper  tear  sheets  and 
clippings,  all  of  which  will  be  received  and  will  be  attached  to 
the  record  in  connection  with  the  testimony  of  the  witness. 

"Q.  Mr.  Czerniawski,  do  you  belong  to  any  other  organization 
in  Westminster  similar  in  character  to  this  School  Improvement 
Association  ? 
"A.  No,  sir. 

"Q.  That  is  the  only  one  you  have  ever  been  affiliated  with  in 
Westminster  ? 

"A.  No,  sir,  I  belong  to  the  Odd  Fellows. 

"Q.  No,  I  didn't  mean  that.  I  mean  similar  to  this  citizens 
organization. 

"A.  No,  sir.  I  belong  to  the  Independent  Order  of  Foresters — 
the  Independent  Order  of  Foresters. 

"Q.  I  don't  believe  anybody  has  ever  called  that  a  front  or- 
ganization. 

"A.  I  belonged  to  the  Moose  Lodge,  and  for  several  years  I 
belonged  to  the  St.  Nipomotz  Church  Society. 

"Q.  You  appreciate,  Mr.  Czerniawski,  that  there  is  a  great 
difference  between  the  organizations  you  have  mentioned  and  or- 
ganizations like  the  International  Workers  Order  which  has  been 
characterized  as  a  Communist  organization  over  and  over  again? 


UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  21 

"A.  At  the  time  I  joined  it  it  was  not  characterized  as  that. 

"Q.  "When  was  it  so  characterized? 

"  A.  I  have  no  idea  when  it  was.  At  that  time  it  was  an  organiza- 
tion I  joined  for  the  insurance  benefit.  It  did  not  have  any  in- 
surance at  that  time.  I  had  three  little  children,  my  wife  and  three 
little  children.  I  thought  if  something  happened  to  me  that  would 
be  the  best  thing  to  do,  to  take  out  insurance,  which  in  my  estima- 
tion was  very  reasonable  at  that  time  and  I  could  afford  to  carry  it. 

"I  would  like  to  also  state  that  I  have  a  son  who  was  in  service 
in  World  War  II  and  in  the  Korean  war.  He  received  honorable 
discharges  from  both  services.  Now  he  is  employed  as  an  ac- 
countant. 

"Q.  I  neglected  to  ask  you  in  connection  with  your  membership 
in  the  International  Workers  Order  whether  or  not  you  received 
a  publication  of  any  kind,  such  as  a  paper  or  circular  or  anything 
from  that  organization  ? 

' '  A.  No,  sir. 

' '  Q.  They  published  nothing  to  your  knowledge  ? 

' '  A.  No,  sir,  not  to  my  knowledge. 

"Q.  Of  course  the  fact  that  the  Daily  People's  World  is  a  propa- 
ganda medium  for  the  Communist  Party  of  California  would  in- 
dicate that  it  had  been  subject  to  scrutiny  and  suspicion  by  a  great 
many  official  agencies.  Is  that  right  ? 

"A.  I  suppose  it  would,  but  I  would  never  subscribe  to  anything 
like  that.  This  was  the  first  time  I  was  interested  and  I  wanted  to 
know  what  it  was  about.  That  is  not  the  only  paper  I  subscribed  to. 
I  subscribed  to  the  Press-Telegram,  a  Long  Beach  paper,  and  I  have 
for  many  years,  and  then  the  Los  Angeles  Examiner. 

"Q.  What  about  the  Westminster  Herald? 

"A.  I  am  sorry.  I  have  not  subscribed  to  that  paper.  However, 
I  gave  the  Westminster  Herald  plenty  of  my  business  as  far  as  print- 
ing goes,  and  I  have  ads  in  their  paper. 

"Mr.  Combs:  Unless  you  have  something  else  to  add,  that  is  all. 
If  you  can  think  of  anything  else  you  want  to  testify  about,  you 
may  do  so. 

' '  The  Witness :  I  don 't  believe  so. ' ' 

TESTIMONY  OF  LLOYD  W.  THOMAS 

Mr.  Thomas  was  the  next  witness  called  to  the  stand  and  testified  as 
follows : 

''Question  by  Mr.  Combs:  Will  you  state  your  full  name  please? 
"A.  Lloyd  W.  Thomas. 
"Q.  Where  do  you  reside  ? 


22  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

"A.  8701  20th  Street,  Westminster. 

' '  Q.  How  long  have  you  resided  at  that  address  ? 

' '  A.  Six  years. 

' '  Q.  Your  business  is  what  ? 

' '  A.  Newspaper  publishing  and  printing. 

"  Q.  What  is  the  name  of  the  newspaper  ? 

"A.  Westminster  Herald. 

"Q.  And  how  long  have  you  been  publisher  of  that  newspaper? 

"A.  I  have  been  publisher  with  my  father  about  two  years.  The 
paper  has  been  in  the  family  about  nine  and  a  half  years. 

"Q.  Are  you  acquainted  with  the  witness  who  preceded  you,  Mr. 
Czerniawski  ? 

"A.  Yes,  sir. 

' '  Q.  How  long  have  you  known  him  ? 

"A.  Since  about  1947. 

"Q.  As  a  newspaper  man,  as  a  citizen,  or  in  any  other  capacity 
for  that  matter,  did  you  conduct  any  inquiry  into  the  origin  and 
nature  of  the  School  Improvement  Association  in  Westminster? 

"A.  Yes,  sir. 

' '  Q.  Did  you  endeavor  to  ascertain  anything  about  the  political 
affiliations  and  beliefs  of  Mr.  Czerniawski? 

"A.  Yes. 

"  Q.  How  did  you  happen  to  do  that  ? 

"A.  Having  knowledge  of  his  party  membership,  the  Independ- 
ent Progressive  Party,  and  his  affiliations  with  the  School  Im- 
provement Association,  I  thought  I  should  make  some  inquiry. 

"Q.  Was  he  then  active  in  the  organization  to  which  I  have  re- 
ferred, the  School  Improvement  Association? 

"A.  Yes,  sir. 

"Q.  He  was? 

"A.  Yes. 

"  Q.  Before  you  started  this  investigation  did  you  know  anything 
about  his  affiliation  with  the  International  Workers  Order? 

"A.  No,  sir. 

"Q.  Did  you  know  anything  about  the  fact  that  he  had  been  a 
subscriber  for  a  period  of  six  months  to  the  Daily  People's  World? 

"A.  Not  before  the  investigation. 

"Q.  Did  you  ever  independently  develop  that  information,  I 
mean  on  your  own?  Did  you  discover  those  facts? 

"A.  The  information  on  the  Daily  People's  World  came  from  a 
former  resident  who  came  into  my  office  and  notified  me  of  that 
fact. 

' '  Q.  About  when  did  this  occur  ? 

"A.  About  three  months  ago. 


UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  23 

' '  Q.  Did  you  ascertain  that  he  had  belonged  to  the  International 
Workers  Order  t 

"A.  I  have  heard  reference  to  that,  but  I  had  no  proof. 

"Q.  Before,  during  or  after  the  period  of  your  investigation? 

"A.  During  my  inquiry. 

' '  Q.  Your  inquiry  commenced  about  when,  how  long  ago  was  it  ? 

"A.  I  became  the  most  curious  beginning  January  11,  1954. 

"Q.  "Would  you  tell  as  briefly  as  you  can,  without  omitting  any- 
thing pertinent,  the  circumstances  that  led  to  your  interest  in  Mr. 
Czerniawski  and  this  organization? 

"A.  I  had  learned  of  a  supposedly  open  and  civic  meeting  to 
take  place  the  night  of  January  11th  at  the  home  of  Lyle  Kichards. 
[  called  Mr.  Richards  at  7.30  and  told  him  I  would  like  to  attend. 

' '  Q.  Is  Mr.  Richards  a  resident  of  Westminster  ? 

"A.  Yes,  sir.  Mr.  Richards  is  treasurer  of  the  Tri-City  Improve- 
ment Association,  I  believe. 

' '  A  Voice  :  Not  the  Tri-City. 

' '  The  Witness :  Or  the  School  Improvement  Association,  excuse 
me.  Upon  arrival  at  Mr.  Richards'  house  at  7.50  p.m.  he  informed 
me  that  the  meeting  had  been  called  off.  However,  later  in  the 
evening,  about  9  o'clock,  Mr.  Edwards  and  I  came  across  what 
we  believed  to  be  the  same  meeting  in  another  person's  house,  in 
the  home  of  Leonard  Fry,  later  to  be  known  as  Chairman  of  the 
Improvement  Association. 

"Q.  He  is  a  resident  of  Westminster,  and  was  at  that  time? 

"A.  Yes.  Mr.  Fry  denied  any  knowledge  of  the  meeting,  of  an 
organization,  of  any  minutes  or  any  officers  or  name  of  an  organ- 
ization when  I  inquired  as  to  whether  or  not  a  meeting  had  trans- 
pired. Mr.  Czerniawski  was  present  at  this  meeting  I  mentioned. 

"Q.  Did  you  see  him? 

"A.  Yes,  sir.  Later  I  inquired  from  Mr.  Fry  if  the  meetings 
were  to  continue  and  were  they  to  be  open  to  the  public  and  the 
press.  He  said  no.  Having  some  knowledge  of  Mr.  Czerniawski 's 
past  affiliation  with  the  Independent  Progressive  Party,  and  that 
possibly  he  was  now  interested  in  the  Improvement  Association  and 
in  our  local  school  affairs,  and  because  the  meeting  was  closed  to 
the  public  and  the  press,  Mr.  Edwards  and  I  took  the  liberty  of 
listening  in  on  the  meeting  from  the  attic  of  the  Odd  Fellows  hall, 
inasmuch  as  we  were  barred  from  the  meeting  itself,  although 
other  reporters  were  allowed  in. 

"Q.  Your  effort  to  go  to  that  meeting,  the  one  you  described  as 
being  held  at  the  home  of  Mr.  Fry,  occurred  when? 

"A.  The  same  night. 

"Q.  What  was  the  date  of  the  meeting  at  the  other  place? 


24  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

''A.  January  25th,  I  believe. 

"Q.  You  say  that  that  was  open  to  other  newspaper  reporters? 

"A.  Yes,  sir. 

"  Q.  Was  it  open  to  the  public  ? 

"A.  I  had  been  told  previously  that  it  was  closed  to  the  public 
and  to  the  press. 

"  Q.  But  members  of  the  press  were  there  ? 

"A.  Yes,  sir. 

' '  Q.  Did  you  see  them  ? 

"A.  Yes,  sir. 

"Q.  Who  were  they? 

"A.  The  reporter  of  the  West  County  News,  a  branch  paper  of 
the  Garden  Grove  News. 

' '  Q.  Were  there  any  other  reporters  present  that  you  recognized  ? 

"A.  At  later  meetings  Mr.  Elmer  AVells  of  the  Santa  Ana  Register 
was  present. 

"Q.  You  saw  those  other  newspaper  representatives  other  than 
your  own  present  at  that  meeting  ? 

"A.  Yes,  sir. 

' '  Q.  Where  were  you  all  this  time  ? 

"A.  I  was  in  the  attic,  sir. 

' '  Q.  How  did  you  manage  to  get  into  that  location  ? 

"A.  Through  the  use  of  a  key  we  entered  the  hall  previous  to 
the  meeting. 

"  Q.  How  long  previous  to  the  meeting  ? 

"A.  At  6.30.  The  business  took  up  about  8  o'clock. 

' '  Q.  You  were  there  about  an  hour  and  a  half  before  the  meeting 
started  ? 

' '  A.  Yes,  sir. 

"  Q.  Who  was  with  you,  if  anyone  ? 

' '  A.  Mr.  Edwards  and  another  chap  named  Merton  Fugler. 

"  Q.  He  lives  in  Westminster,  too  ? 

' '  A.  Yes,  sir. 

"Q.  You  went  up  to  the  attic  for  the  purpose  of  ascertaining 
what  went  on  at  the  meeting  at  which  other  reporters  were  present 
and  at  which  you  would  not  be  admitted  ? 

"A.  That  is  right. 

"Q.  Were  you  there  when  the  people  began  to  come  into  the 
hall? 

1 '  A.  Yes,  sir. 

"Q.  Was  there  any  physical  facility  in  the  ceiling  of  the  build- 
ing which  enabled  you  to  observe  what  transpired  ? 

"A.  I  found  a  ventilating  grill  in  the  center  of  the  ceiling. 

"Q.  Did  you  hear  what  went  on  ? 


UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  25 

' '  A.  Very  well. 

"Q.  Were  you  there  during  the  entire  time  that  the  meeting 
lasted  ? 

' '  A.  Yes,  sir. 

' '  Q.  Did  you  remain  there  until  the  last  participant  in  the  meet- 
ing had  left  the  building  ? 

' '  A.  Yes,  sir. 

' '  Q.  You  then  emerged  from  your  place  of  concealment  and  left 
the  premises,  I  take  it  ? 

' '  A.  That  is  right. 

' '  Q.  Did  you  keep  any  written  record  or  notes  of  what  you  saw 
and  heard  ? 

' '  A.  Yes,  we  kept  a  running  record  of  the  meeting. 

' '  Q.  There  were  three  of  you  there  ? 

■ '  A.  Yes,  sir. 

"  Q.  It  was  a  little  uncomfortable,  wasn  't  it  ? 

"A.  Yes. 

"  Q.  How  long  did  the  meeting  last  ? 

"A.  The  meeting  began  at  8  o'clock  and  adjourned  at  10,  11 
and  11.30. 

"Q.  Mr.  Thomas,  did  you  attend  subsequent  meetings  of  the 
character  ? 

' '  A.  Yes,  sir. 

"  Q.  In  the  same  way  1 

1 '  A.  In  the  same  way. 

"  Q.  With  the  same  people  ? 

"A.  Yes,  sir. 

"  Q.  At  the  same  place  ? 

' '  A.  Yes,  sir. 

"  Q.  In  the  same  attic  ? 

1 '  A.  Yes,  sir. 

' '  Q.  Did  you  take  notes  on  those  subsequent  occasions  ? 

"A.  That  is  right. 

"Q.  Are  you  able  to  tell  us  approximately  when  those  subse- 
quent meetings  took  place  ? 

"A.  February  8th,  February  22d. 

"Q.  All  of  this  year? 

' '  A.  Yes  sir ;  and  I  believe  March  22d. 

"  Q.  Four  meetings  in  all  ? 

■ '  A.  Yes,  sir. 

"Q.  Were  other  meetings  held  thereafter  that  time,  after  you 
attended  the  last  one  ? 

' '  A.  Yes,  sir. 


26  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

"  Q.  Why  didn  't  you  attend  those  1 

"A.  We  went  in,  sir,  on  two  or  three  occasions,  myself  or  Mr. 
or  Mrs.  Edwards  who  occasionally  writes  for  our  paper.  On  enter- 
ing, the  meetings  were  immediately  adjourned. 

"Q.  You  say  you  attended  four  of  these  attic  meetings.  You 
also  testified  that  other  meetings  were  held  thereafter  in  the  same 
place  ? 

' '  A.  Yes,  sir,  in  the  same  place. 

"  Q.  But  you  did  not  go  up  to  the  attic  any  more  ? 

' '  A.  No,  sir. 

"Q.  Why  not? 

"A.  We  had  been  discovered,  I  believe  around  the  fourth  time, 
as  being  in  the  attic. 

"  Q.  How  did  that  occur  ? 

"A.  Through  the  dropping  of  a  camera  cable  through  the  venti- 
lator grill. 

' '  Q.  Were  you  taking  pictures  ? 

' '  A.  Yes,  sir. 

' '  Q.  What  kind  of  equipment  did  you  have  ? 

' '  A.  We  had  infrared,  sir. 

"  Q.  Did  you  develop  the  negatives  ? 

' '  A.  Yes,  sir. 

"  Q.  Were  they  clear  ? 

' '  A.  Fairly  much. 

' '  Q.  What  did  you  do  with  the  developed  negatives  ? 

' '  A.  They  haven 't  been  put  to  any  use,  sir. 

' '  Q.  Do  you  have  them  in  your  possession  ? 

' '  A.  Not  with  me,  sir. 

"Q.  If  the  committee  should  require  you  to  do  so,  or  request  you 
to  do  so,  would  you  make  them  available  to  the  committee  ? 

"A.  Absolutely. 

"Q.  To  go  on  with  this  incident,  You  were  discovered.  You 
emerged  from  the  attic.  Then  what  happened? 

' '  A.  We  were  discovered  in  the  attic.  Mr.  Czerniawski,  I  believe 
followed  by  Mr.  Lyle  Richards — Mr.  Richards  I  believe  was  the 
first  one  up  the  ladder  and  broke  through. 

"Q.  Up  the  ladder  ? 

"A.  Yes,  sir.  There  is  a  ladder  from  the  second  floor  to  the 
attic.  Mr.  Richards  was  the  first  one  to  come  through,  breaking 
open  the  drop  door,  I  believe  with  his  head  or  shoulders.  Two  men 
were  standing  on  the  door.  I  believe  he  was  followed  by  Mr. 
Czerniawski,  who  himself  went  through  the  attic  with  a  large 
board  in  his  hand.  At  that  time  I  was  endeavoring  to  put  the 


UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  27 

cameras  and  film  and  such  under  the  eaves,  thinking  they  would 
be  safer  there.  The  police  were  summoned. 

"Q.  By  whom. 

"A.  The  Orange  County  Sheriff's  office  by  a  member  of  their 
organization. 

"Q.  By  that  you  mean  a  member  of  the  organization  meeting 
there  ? 

' '  A.  Yes,  sir,  the  Improvement  Association. 

"Q.  All  right. 

"A.  They  requested  the  Orange  County  Sheriffs  to  come  to  the 
meeting  and  place  Mr.  Edwards  and  I  under  arrest.  Mr.  Czerniaw- 
ski  also  requested  that  the  films  and  notes  be  confiscated,  the  films 
and  notes  that  we  took  of  a  supposedly  public  meeting. 

"Q.  "Were  other  newspaper  reporters  present  at  all  of  these 
meetings  ? 

"A.  Yes,  I  think  reporters  were  present  at  all  meetings,  al- 
though occasionally  they  came  in  late. 

"  Q.  You  observed  this  yourself  ? 

"A.  Yes,  sir. 

"  Q.  Were  you  arrested  ? 

"A.  No,  sir. 

"Q.  By  the  Sheriff's  office? 

"A.  No,  sir. 

"Q.  "Were  the  notes  and  photographic  equipment  and  the  nega- 
tives confiscated  by  anyone  ? 

"A.  The  sheriff's  officers  offered  to  take  our  films  into  custody. 
They  were  released  to  me  two  days  later. 

"Q.  Was  any  criminal  charge  filed  against  you  by  anyone  to 
vour  knowledge  ? 

' '  A.  No  criminal  charge  and  no  attempt  was  made. 

"  Q.  Was  any  civil  suit  filed  to  your  knowledge  ? 

"A.  No,  sir. 

"  Q.  Were  you  ever  placed  under  arrest  ? 

"A.  No,  sir. 

"Q.  Was  your  equipment  all  returned  to  you,  and  your  notes 
returned  to  you  ? 

' '  A.  Yes,  sir. 

"Q.  Did  you  make  any  further  attempts  to  conceal  yourself  in 
the  attic  to  observe  what  happened  at  their  meetings  which  were 
held  in  the  same  locale  ? 

"A.  No,  sir. 

"Q.  Were  other  meetings  hold  there? 

"A.  Yes,  sir. 


28  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

"Q.  Were  you  told  on  subsequent  occasions  by  anyone  con- 
nected with  the  Improvement  Association  that  you  would  not  be 
admitted  to  these  meetings,  or  any  of  them  ? 

"A.  Yes,  sir.  It  became  general  knowledge. 

"Q.  The  other  members  of  the  press  would  be  admitted,  but 
you  were  not  welcome  ? 

"A.  That  is  right. 

"Q.  Was  it  put  to  you  that  you  were  not  welcome  or  that  you 
would  not  be  permitted  to  attend  ? 

"A.  It  was  put  that  I  could  attend,  but  would  not  be  welcome. 

"Q.  Do  you  have  your  notes  with  you,  Mr.  Thomas,  that  you 
took  on  any  of  those  occasions  ? 

"  A.  I  have  typewritten  copies  of  the  notes. 

"  Q.  Do  you  have  them  with  you  presently  ? 

"A.  Yes,  sir. 

' '  Q.  Will  you  submit  them  at  this  time  to  the  committee  ? 

"A.  Yes,  sir. 

"Mr.  Combs:  Let  the  record  show  that  the  witness  has  handed 
to  the  committee  a  series  of  typewritten  sheets  ten  and  a  half  type- 
written sheets,  which  have  been  identified  by  the  witness  as  typed 
copies  of  the  notes  that  were  taken  on  the  occasions  that  he  at- 
tended these  meetings  at  the  times  and  places  and  in  the  manner 
heretofore  described. 

' '  Q.  Mr.  Thomas,  do  you  desire  to  have  these  returned  to  you  or 
may  we  keep  them  ? 

"A.  The  committee  may  keep  them. 

"Q.  Thank  you.  Did  you  continue  to  investigate  the  personnel 
and  the  activities  of  the  Improvement  Association  ? 

"A.  Yes,  sir. 

"Q.  You  did  that  for  the  reason  you  have  heretofore  described, 
that  you  suspected  it  was  engaged  in  some  sort  of  a  subversive 
activity,  or  had  been  infiltrated  or  was  led  by  people  with  sub- 
versive records  ? 

"A.  Yes.  I  became  interested  and  pressed  the  inquiry  because 
of  Mr.  Czerniawski.  He  was  assistant  membership  chairman  and  I 
presume  now  a  membership  chairman  with  headquarters  at  his 
store. 

"  Q.  For  this  association  ? 

"A.  Yes,  sir,  and  he  is  influential  in  the  association.  I  had  some 
knowledge  of  his  past  affiliations  and  I  pressed  the  inquiry  to  de- 
termine the  extent  of  possible  subversive  character  existing  in  the 
membership. 

"Q.  As  a  newspaper  man  you  were  interested  not  only  in  the 
Improvement  Association,  but  having  discovered  the  Independent 


UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  29 

Progressive  Party  affiliation,  the  People's  Daily  World  subscription 
and  the  International  Workers  Order  affiliation  in  the  process  of 
your  work,  it  led  you  to  suspect  that  the  organization  might  have 
some  kind  of  ulterior  purpose,  is  that  true  ? 

' '  A.  Either  the  organization  or  some  of  its  membership  who  may 
have  motives  that  would  be  beneficial  to  other  organizations  that 
they  might  be  on  too. 

"Q.  Did  you  investigate  any  other  members  or  leaders  of  the 
organization  except  Mr.  Czerniawski  ? 

"A.  To  some  extent,  but  not  as  fully. 

"  Q.  What  did  you  find  in  that  connection  ? 

"A.  I  believe  a  few  minor  details  which  cropped  up,  volunteered 
by  people.  We  have  not  pressed  them  to  the  fullest  extent  though. 
What  little  we  do  have  we  have  submitted  to  the  committee. 

"Q.  You  will  make  available  this  information  on  request,  will 
you? 

"A.  Yes,  sir. 

"Q.  What  was  the  net  result  of  your  investigation  and  work, 
Mr.  Thomas,  to  what  conclusion  did  you  come,  if  any  ? 

"A.  I  believe  that  an  organization  representing  itself  to  be  a 
civic  group  attempting  to  work  for  the  betterment  of  our  schools 
and  community  should  not  have  in  it  personnel  or  officers  who  are 
members  or  have  had  membership  in  organizations  that  are  not 
akin  to  our  American  way  of  life.  I  believe  that  any  trustees  that 
have  been  sponsored  by  such  an  organization,  that  its  membership 
should  give  this  very  serious  consideration  inasmuch  as  this  group 
has  membership  in  it  that  is  affiliated  with  possible  front  organiza- 
tions and  has  sought  to  gain  control  of  the  school  board  successfully. 

"Q.  Is  there  anything  else  you  care  to  add,  Mr.  Thomas? 

"A.  My  reasons  for  bringing  this  to  the  committee  were  first  to 
present  evidence  of  material  given  to  our  office,  to  bring  to  light 
any  possible  subversive  character  that  existed  in  the  committee,  if 
such  existed. 

"Q.  Do  you  mean  the  Improvement  Association? 

"A.  That  is  right.  Keference  was  made  earlier  today  of  our 
investigation  in  the  Long  Beach,  Dominguez  area.  On  one  occasion 
Mr.  Czerniawski  said  that  we  were  claiming  to  have  connections 
with  the  police  force,  or  something. 

"Q.  Those  statements  were  contained  in  the  letters  he  submitted. 

"A.  On  all  occasions  we  submitted  business  cards,  and  on  one 
or  two  occasions  we  were  asked  what  would  happen  to  the  material 
if  it  came  our  way.  We  said  it  would  be  turned  in  to  a  government 
agency,  but  we  were  newspaper  men. 


30  UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES  IN  CALIFORNIA 

"Q.  You  never  identified  yourselves  or  made  an  effort  to  repre- 
sent yourselves,  directly  or  indirectly,  as  having  any  official  investi- 
gative capacity? 

' '  A.  No,  sir.  "We  were  only  interested  where  it  would  benefit  the 
community. 

"Q.  You  always  submitted  your  business  card  on  each  and 
every  occasion,  which  gave  your  occupation  as  a  newspaper  man? 

' '  A.  Yes,  sir. 

"  Q.  Do  you  have  anything  further  to  offer  ? 

"A.  I  believe  that  is  all  I  have. 

"Mr.  Combs:  Thank  you." 

Mr.  Ralph  R.  Edwards  was  called  to  the  stand  and  stated  that  he 
resided  at  14242  South  Golden  West  Street  in  Westminster,  had 
accompanied  Mr.  Thomas  on  the  expeditions  into  the  Odd  Fellows  Hall 
attic,  and  corroborated  his  testimony  concerning  the  meetings  held 
there  in  every  respect. 

Mr.  Czerniawski  was  then  recalled  to  the  stand,  briefly  described  the 
encounter  in  the  Westminster  drug  store  and  was  then  questioned  fur- 
ther concerning  the  School  Improvement  Association  as  follows: 

"Question  by  Mr.  Combs:  Senator  Burns  inquired  of  another 
witness  whether  or  not  the  Improvement  Association  was  still  func- 
tioning and  holding  meetings.  Is  it,  to  your  knowledge? 
"A.  So  far  I  think  I  did  attend  meetings. 
"Q.  I  don't  mean  you,  but  does  the  organization  still  exist? 
"A.  As  far  as  I  know  it  does. 
"  Q.  Are  you  still  connected  with  it  ? 

"A.  Well,  I  haven't  paid  any  dues  for  quite  some  time.  I  don't 
know  whether  I  am  or  not. 

"Q.  Did  you  hold  an  office  in  the  organization? 
"A.  I  was  elected  at  one  of  the  meetings  for  membership  chair- 
man, but  I  told  them  I  could  not  accept.  I  said  I  could  not  accept 
that  position  because  I  was  busy  in  my  store  and  could  not  devote 
the  time.  I  said  I  would  help  in  any  way  I  could,  but  I  would  not 
take  the  office  or  job. 

"Q.  Were  the  meetings  in  the  Odd  Fellows  Hall  open  or 
closed  to  the  press? 

' '  A.  They  were  open  to  the  public  and  the  press. 
' '  Q.  They  were  open  to  the  public  and  the  press  ? 
' '  A.  That  is  right,  sir,  as  far  as  I  know. 

"Q.  Was  it  made  clear  to  Mr.  Thomas  and  Mr.  Edwards  that 
they  were  not  welcome  at  the  meeting? 

"A.  It  was  never  mentioned  to  Mr.  Thomas  or  Mr.  Edwards 
as  far  as  I  know. 


UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  31 

"Q.  Could  it  have  been  mentioned  to  them  without  your 
knowledge  ? 

"A.  It  probably  could  because  we  are  not  taking  a  very  active 
part  in  the  organization  because  I  have  my  business  to  attend  to. 
The  only  active  part  I  took  in  the  organization  was  to  pay  dues  as 
a  dues  paying  member. 

"Q.  The  paper  that  was  published  by  Mr.  Thomas  was  not 
exactly  friendly  toward  the  improvement  society,  was  it? 

"A.  No,  it  was  not,  sir.  It  was  very  biased. 

"Q.  So  it  would  not  be  beyond  the  realm  of  logic  or  reason  to 
say  that  the  people  representing  that  paper  would  be  perhaps  a 
little  less  welcome  at  your  affairs  than  papers  that  were  friendly 
toward  your  association? 

"A.  That  is  true  enough.  However,  they  were  not  excluded. 
They  were  welcome  if  they  wanted  to  come,  but  they  knew  that 
we  weren't  very  friendly  toward  them  on  this  biased  attitude. 

"Q.  They  were  not  friendly  toward  you  and  you  were  not 
friendly  toward  them? 

"A.  That  is  right. 

' '  Question  by  Chairman  Burns :  Mr.  Czerniawski,  in  these 
notes  I  see  a  statement  by  member  Fry  in  which  he  says,  'I  agree 
and  think  that  we  should  plan  a  constructive  program  keeping  in 
mind  our  one  aim,  that  of  three  men  from  our  group  elected  to 
the  board.' 

"Was  that  the  main  reason  why  this  organization  was  formed, 
this  Improvement  Association,  to  secure  three  members  on  the 
school  board? 

"A.  As  far  as  I  know,  our  aim  in  organizing  was  to  clean  up 
the  school  district  in  that  area.  It  wasn't  run  right. 

"Q.  According  to  your  plan  you  intended  to  elect  a  majority  of 
the  members  of  the  board  ? 

"A.  That  is  right. 

"  Q.  Of  the  school  board,  is  that  right  f 

"A.  That  is  right. 

"Q.  Your  meeting  was  held  January  25th.  The  election  was 
held  subsequently.  What  happened  at  the  election.  Did  you  secure 
three  places  on  the  board  ? 

"A.  Yes,  by  a  great  majority,  a  landslide  you  might  say. 

"Q.  In  other  words,  the  main  aim  and  objective  of  the  organiza- 
tion was  accomplished  ? 

"A.  That  is  right.  We  based  our  ideals  on  the  truth.  That  is 
why  the  organization  was  successful  in  the  election,  because  we 
based  our  aims  on  the  truth  only. 


32  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

"Q.  Did  you  promulgate  your  propaganda  and  information  as 
you  saw  it  ? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  What  changes  were  made  in  the  school  administration  since 
the  election?  Has  any  radical  change  been  made?  Have  you 
changed  principals  or  superintendents?  What  has  happened? 

"A.  I  think  the  school  board  could  best  answer  that. 

"  Q.  Is  there  a  member  of  the  school  board  here  ? 

"A.  Yes,  sir. 

' '  Q.  Would  he  be  willing  to  tell  us  something  about  it  ? 

"A.  I  guess  he  would.  We  have  Mr.  LeRoy  King  and  Mr. 
Schulzstad. 

' '  Chairman  Burns :  That  is  all,  Mr.  Czerniawski. ' ' 

Mr.  LeRoy  Carlin  King  was  questioned  and  testified  that  he  resided 
at  7742  Westminster  Avenue  in  the  City  of  Westminster,  and  testified 
as  follows : 

"Question  by  Chairman  Burns:  You  are  a  member  of  the 
school  board  of  the  Westminster  School  District? 

"A.  That  is  right,  sir. 

"Q.  You  were  elected  at  a  special  election,  were  you  not? 

"A.  No.   It  was  a  regular  election  on  the  21st  of  May. 

"Q.  You  participated  in  the  formation  and  activities  of  the 
Tri-City  Improvement  Association,  did  you  not  ? 

"A.  I  cannot  say  that  I  participated  too  much  in  the  formation, 
but  I  did  become  a  member  of  the  organization,  and  I  was  spon- 
sored by  that  organization. 

' '  Q.  In  your  judgment  and  in  your  opinion  do  you  believe  from 
what  you  know  of  the  course  of  the  organization  and  its  works, 
that  it  was  in  any  way  subversive  ? 

"A.  I  cannot  by  any  stretch  of  the  imagination  picture  any 
such  thing. 

"Q.  You  know  of  no  Communist  influence  in  its  operation  or 
in  the  conduct  of  its  meetings  ? 

"A.  Not  in  any  manner. 

"Q.  Will  you  briefly  tell  us  what  changes  the  school  board  has 
made  since  the  new  regime  took  over. 

"A.  As  for  changes  I  cannot  think  of  any  material  ones.  As  a 
new  member  I  was  elected  to  the  chairmanship  of  the  board.  One  of 
my  member  candidates,  Mrs.  Genevieve  Nashburn,  was  elected  as 
clerk  of  the  present  board,  the  three  of  us  being  elected  to  com- 
plete it  as  a  five-man  board,  according  to  past  legislation,  raising 
it  from  a  three-man  board  to  a  five-man  board. 

"  Q.  It  is  a  five-man  board  now  ? 


UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  33 

''A.  That  is  right. 

1 '  Q.  Do  you  still  have  the  same  district  superintendent  ? 

"A.  We  still  have  the  same  district  superintendent.  We  have 
the  same  assistant  to  the  superintendent.  We  have  the  same  prin- 
cipals in  so  far  as  I  know.  To  the  best  of  my  knowledge  we  have 
about  the  same  teaching  staff  with  the  possible  exception  of  the 
usual,  customary  turnover.  We  have  advocated  no  drastic  changes 
or  policies  whatever  as  of  the  present  time. 

"Q.  Has  the  district  at  the  present  time  filed  a  request  for 
state  funds  for  any  purposes  ? 

"A.  I  cannot  exactly  tell  you  how  that  works.  I  know  the  pro- 
gram of  the  previous  board  in  the  election  was  an  $80,000  bond 
issue.  There  was  a  state  loan  of  some  $625,000,000,  I  believe,  which 
was  on  the  ballot  at  the  last  election.  Both  issues  were  defeated. 

"Q.  At  the  present  time  probably  there  is  no  application  for 
state  funds  for  building  purposes  ? 

' '  A.  Not  to  the  best  of  my  knowledge,  no,  sir. 

' '  Chairman  Burns :  Do  you  have  any  questions,  Mr.  Combs  ? 

' '  Mr.  Combs :  No,  I  have  no  questions. 

"Chairman  Burns:  Thank  you,  Mr.  King,  unless  you  want  to 
add  something. 

' '  The  Witness :  May  I  address  a  question  to  you,  sir  ? 

' '  Chairman  Burns :  Certainly. 

"The  Witness:  On  behalf  of  the  school  board,  the  present 
school  board  and  the  school  district,  it  came  to  my  attention  some 
few  days  ago  that  an  official  or  officials  of  the  school  district  had 
requested  this  investigation  also,  and  as  chairman  of  the  board  am 
I  entitled  to  know  if  some  of  my  officials  have  questions? 

"Chairman  Burns:  You  want  to  know  the  individuals  who  re- 
quested that  the  committee  investigate  this  matter? 

"The  Witness:  Only  insofar  as  it  concerns  the  administration. 

1 '  Chairman  Burns ;  For  your  information,  Mr.  King,  the  request 
came  before  you  were  a  member  of  the  board. 

' '  The  Witness :  I  see. 

"Chairman  Burns:  I  don't  believe  there  would  be  any  hesi- 
tancy on  the  part  of  the  people  who  asked  for  the  investigation  to 
have  their  names  disclosed,  but  I  believe  at  this  time  for  the  bene- 
fit of  all  concerned  I  would  withhold  that  information.  I  would 
advise  you  of  this.  There  was  no  question  about  you  or  the  other 
new  members  of  the  board  from  a  personal  standpoint,  to  the  best 
of  my  recollection. 

"Mr.  Combs :  There  was  none. 

"Chairman  Burns:  It  was  a  long  time  before  the  election,  as 
Mr.  Combs  has  said.  The  question  why  we  delayed  doing  anything 


34  UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

about  it  at  all  was  not  to  interfere  with  a  local  election  of  any  kind. 
That  has  been  the  policy  of  this  committee,  not  only  as  far  as 
school  boards  are  concerned,  but  in  all  elections.  We  don't  want 
to  step  into  a  local  political  situation. 

' '  The  Witness :  Thank  you,  sir. 

"Chairman  Burns:  You  are  entirely  welcome,  and  thank  you. 
Does  anyone  else  desire  to  be  heard  in  this  matter  relating  to 
Westminster  ? 

"Mr.  Eeid:  I  do,  sir. 

The  committee,  pursuant  to  his  request,  agreed  to  hear  the  testimony 
of  W.  L.  Reid,  who  took  the  stand  and  stated  that  he  resided  at  7851 
10th  Street  in  Westminister,  was  a  sales  representative,  had  lived  in 
Westminster  for  three  years  and  prior  to  that  time  resided  in  Garden 
Grove  for  approximately  the  same  period  of  time.  Mr.  Reid  further 
stated  that  he  was  one  of  the  founders  of  the  School  Improvement  As- 
sociation and  that  Mr.  Czerniawski  became  a  member  of  it  some  time 
later. 

He  said,  in  response  to  an  inquiry  concerning  the  founders  of  the 
association,  that  it  was  founded  by  Leonard  Fry  and  himself.  He  then 
testified  as  follows: 

' '  Q.  Did  you  hold  any  official  position  in  the  organization  ? 
' '  A.  No,  I  have  not,  other  than  just  errand  boy. 
"Q.  Did  Mr.  Fry? 

"A.  Yes.  Mr.  Fry  was  chairman  of  our  School  Improvement 
Association. 

"  Q.  Actually  when  was  it  formed  ? 
"A.  I  am  not  too  good  on  dates. 
' '  Q.  Approximately  as  near  as  you  can  fix  it  ? 
"A.  I  could  attach  it  to  other  happenings  there  and  arrive  at 
a  fair  date.  I  would  say  roughly  six  or  eight  months  ago. 
"  Q.  At  whose  residence  was  the  organization  meeting  held  ? 
"A.  The  first  meeting  was  held  at  Mr.  Fry's  residence. 
' '  Q.  That  was  on  what  date  ? 
"A.  The  organizational  date. 

"Q.  Was  that  the  date  Mr.  Thomas  and  Mr.  Edwards  came  and 
inquired  about  attending  the  meeting? 

"A.  Mr.  Thomas  and  Mr.  Edwards  came  into  the  meeting  right 
at  the  end  of  the  meeting.  We  were  serving  refreshments. 
"  Q.  This  was  the  organizational  meeting  ? 
"A.  Yes,  sir. 

' '  Q.  Did  they  come  in  and  look  at  the  minutes  ? 
"A.  No.  They  were  served  coffee  and  cake.  The  meeting  was 
over. 


UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES   IN   CALIFORNIA  35 

"  Q.  This  was  held  in  Mr.  Fry's  home  ? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  Had  the  meeting  theretofore  been  scheduled  at  some  other 
place? 

"A.  Not  to  my  knowledge. 

"  Q.  Could  it  have  been  without  your  knowledge  ? 

"A.  I  doubt  it  very  much  because  Mr.  Fry  and  I  originated 
the  meeting. 

"Q.  Did  Mr.  Thomas  on  that  occasion  inquire  about  the  nature 
and  purpose  of  the  organization  ? 

"A.  Yes. 

"  Q.  Did  he  discuss  these  matters  with  you  ? 

"A.  No — with  Mr.  Fry  in  my  hearing. 

' '  Q.  You  were  present  and  you  heard  the  conversation  ? 

"A.  Yes,  sir. 

"Q.  Did  he  get  information  as  to  the  nature  and  purpose  of 
the  movement  ? 

"A.  Yes,  sir. 

"Q.  Was  he  subsequently  informed  by  you  or  anybody  else 
that  he  would  not  be  welcome  at  your  meetings? 

"A.  Yes,  sir.  He  was  told  by  Mr.  Fry  that  he  would  not  be  wel- 
come. The  reason  was  because  he  made  his  stories  up  out  of  whole 
cloth. 

"Q.  He  was  antagonistic  toward  the  organization,  according  to 
your  view  ? 

1 '  A.  That  is  right,  definitely. 

"Q.  He  published  articles  in  the  paper  that  were  antagonistic 
toward  the  organization,  or  critical  of  it  ? 

"A.  Yes.  It  was  not  an  organization  at  that  time.  However,  in 
view  of  the  general  school  controversy  we  thought  his  stand  was 
antagonistic  to  our  views. 

' '  Q.  Did  you  hold  any  closed  meetings  that  were  not  open  to  the 
public  ? 

"A.  No,  sir.  "We  invited  the  press  at  all  times.  Any  of  the  meet- 
ings I  attended  were  also  attended  by  newspaper  reporters,  either 
or  both  of  the  Garden  Grove  News  or  the  Santa  Ana  Register. 

"Q.  You  felt  it  was  made  clear  to  Mr.  Thomas  he  was  not  wel- 
come? 

"A.  He  was  not  excluded. 

"Q.  What  do  you  mean  by  excluded? 

"A.  He  was  merely  told  in  view  of  the  fact  his  articles  were 
made  up  generally  through  imagination  that  he  would  not  need  to 
attend. 


UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

"Q.  Did  somebody  meet  him  at  the  door  and  tell  him  that  he 
could  not  come  in  or  that  he  would  not  be  welcome  if  he  did 
come  in  ? 

"A.  No,  sir.  He  was  brought  in  and  served  coffee  and  cake. 

"Q.  That  is  one  occasion,  but  what  about  subsequent  occasions? 

"A.  I  think  he  attended  meetings  of  the  general  membership 
after  that.  In  fact  we  were  not  aware  of  his  presence. 

"Q.  I  understand,  but  at  any  meeting  you  ever  held  was  he  told 
in  your  presence  or  in  your  hearing  that  he  would  not  be  welcome  ? 

"A.  Except  for  the  first  organizational  meeting,  I  never  saw  him 
at  one  of  our  meetings,  so  I  could  not  say  he  was  ever  told. 

"Q.  But  at  the  organizational  meeting  he  was  told  he  would  not 
be  welcome  ? 

"A.  He  was  told  in  view  of  his  stand  he  would  not  be  welcome, 
but  he  was  not  excluded. 

' '  Q.  Mr.  Fry  told  him  that  ? 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

"  Q.  In  your  presence  and  in  your  hearing  ? 

"A.  That  is  right. 

' '  Q.  Was  anyone  else  present  on  that  occasion  ? 

"A.  I  can't  recall.  The  membership  was  there. 

' '  Q.  Did  you  attend  the  meetings  held  in  the  Odd  Fellows  Hall  ? 

"A.  One  or  two  of  them.  I  don't  remember  the  dates  particu- 
larly, I  did  not  attend  all  of  them.  My  work  keeps  me  out  a  great 
deal  during  the  night. 

"  Q.  "Were  you  present  at  any  of  the  attic  meetings  ? 

"  A.  Apparently  so.  I  didn't  know  it  on  that  day — I  wasn't  there 
at  the  one  at  which  he  was  discovered. 

' '  Q.  Does  the  organization  still  exist  and  function  ? 

"A.  More  or  less.  It  exists  in  this  respect:  We  still  have  some 
money  to  raise  to  offset  our  campaign  expenses. 

"Q.  Were  they  considerable. 

"A.  No.  I  would  say — 

"Q.  It  is  not  material.  Did  you  wish  to  add  anything  else,  Mr. 
Reid? 

"A.  Just  that  I  would  like  to  definitely  insist  that  the  School 
Improvement  Association  is  not  in  any  sense  of  the  word  a  Com- 
munist front  organization,  has  no  affiliation  with  the  organization, 
and  that  our  membership  lists  were  turned  over  to  Bill  Callan, 
Secretary  of  the  Orange  County  Farmers,  which  is  the  only  place 
where  we  could  have  any  sort  of  a  check.  We  have  gone  to  great 
lengths  to  see  that  the  organization  is  free  of  any  taint. 


UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IX   CALIFORNIA  37 

Q.  Who  turned  the  list  over  to  them  ? 
A.  We  did. 

Q.  What  group  is  that  again? 
:  A.  I  believe  it  is  the  Associated  Farmers  of  Orange  County. 

They  would  have  a  list  of  your  members  ? 
;A.  Yes.  My  wife  and  I  spent  several  afternoons  with  him. 
1 Q.  Where  is  his  office  ? 

;A.  On  North  Los  Angeles  Street,  approximately  the  600  block, 
Anaheim. 

1 Q.  Anything  else,  Mr.  Reid  ? 
;  A.  That  is  all,  sir. ' ' 
Mr.  Combs :  "I  have  no  further  questions." 

Chairman  Burns:  "For  the  benefit  of  those  who  came  from 
Westminster,  all  of  you,  we  appreciate  your  presence  here  today. 
As  far  as  the  official  position  of  the  committee  is  concerned,  after 
going  through  the  transcript  we  will  make  that  known  to  those 
interested. ' ' 


CONCLUSIONS 

Within  30  days  after  the  conclusion  of  the  public  hearing,  the  com- 
mittee was  receiving  calls  by  reporters  from  newspapers  in  Orange 
County  rather  insistently  demanding  some  expression  of  the  committee 
concerning  its  official  position  regarding  the  hearing.  These  requests 
continued  to  such  an  extent  that  Senator  Burns,  in  September,  1954, 
gave  his  own  personal  opinion  to  the  effect  that  no  evidence  was  pro- 
duced at  the  hearing  that  would  establish  Communist  Party  member- 
ship on  the  part  of  Mr.  Czerniawski  nor  prove  that  he  was  an  active 
member  in  a  subversive  organization.  Senator  Burns  made  it  clear  that 
the  opinion  expressed  was  his  own  and  not  necessarily  shared  by  other 
members  of  the  committee. 

Immediately  after  this  expression,  an  article  appeared  in  the  Santa 
Ana  Register  dated  September  16,  1954,  which  we  deem  it  important  to 
quote  below  for  the  purpose  of  indicating  the  attitude  of  this  partic- 
ular paper,  or  at  least  the  reporter  who  wrote  the  article,  toward  the 
entire  Westminster  problem. 

"Red  Probe  Suspects  Given  'Clean  Bill' 
"Red-hunting  Sen.  Hugh  M.  Burns,  chairman  of  the  State  Sen- 
ate Committee  on  Un-American  Activities,  indicated  yesterday 
that  the  Westminster  School  Improvement  Association  and  West- 
minster hardware  dealer,  Albin  Czerniawski  will  be  cleared  of 
subversive  charges. 

"However,  Burns  emphasized  that  the  opinion  is  his  own  and 
not  necessarily  that  of  the  two  other  members  of  the  State's  Red- 
probing  Committee,  Sen.  Nathan  Coombs  of  Napa  County  and 
Richard  E.  Combs,  Chief  Counsel. 

"Burns  added  that  he  is  basing  his  'off-the-cuff'  opinion  on  evi- 
dence heard  at  an  'exploratory  hearing'  held  at  Los  Angeles  last 
July  to  probe  alleged  infiltration  into  Westminster  School  District 
politics. 

"  'I  haven't  had  a  chance  to  read  the  hearing  transcript.  But 
in  my  opinion,  by  the  evidence  presented,  that  group  (The  West- 
minster School  Improvement  Assn.)  hasn't  a  thing  to  worry 
about  being  subversive. 

' '  '  True,  one  of  the  fellows  belonged  to  a  Communist  front  or- 
ganization, but  that  in  itself  doesn't  make  him  a  member  of  the 
Communist  Party  or  active  in  any  subversive  group,'  Burns  de- 
dared. 

(38) 


UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  39 

"The  Senator  from  Fresno  explained  that  his  work  on  the  com- 
mittee plus  his  senatorial  duties  along  with  having  to  earn  a  living, 
'  like  anyone  else, '  is  the  reason  for  the  delay  of  an  opinion  on  the 
Westminster  probe. 

"However,  he  said,  in  view  of  the  expressed  interest  in  the  West- 
minster situation  he  will  do  all  he  can  to  expedite  an  official  opinion 
and  get  out  a  more  detailed  report  soon  as  he  can. 

"Burns  said  that  as  far  as  he  is  concerned  Westminster  School 
Improvement  Assn.  had  a  right  to  organize  in  an  effort  to  steer 
Westminster  School  District  affairs  if  they  were  unhappy  with  the 
way  things  were  going.  'And,'  he  added,  'there  is  no  evidence  to 
support  in  any  way  their  being  subversive.' 

' '  Burns  pointed  out  that  the  questions  raised  at  the  hearing  was 
the  possibility  of  Czerniawski  being  either  an  official  or  functionary 
in  the  group  and  also  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party. 

' '  '  About  the  only  thing  the  hearing  proved, '  he  declared,  '  was 

that  this  man   (Czerniawski)   holds  an  insurance  policy  in  the 

International  Workers  Order.  But  this  is  not  evidence  to  support 

subversive  charges.' 

"Red  infiltration  into  the  school  district's  politics  was  alleged 
by  Lloyd  Thomas,  31,  'cloak  and  dagger'  editor  of  the  Westmin- 
ster Weekly  Herald.  Thomas  presented  evidence  which  he  charged 
implicates  Czerniawski  with  the  Communist  Party.  He  also  im- 
plied that  the  52-year-old  hardware  dealer  was  the  'Red'  link  of 
the  Westminster  School  Improvement  Assn. 

"Under  oath  Czerniawski  admitted  membership  in  the  I.  W.  0., 
a  group  which  has  been  cited  as  Communist-front.  But  he  denied 
knowledge  of  its  Communist  affiliations  and  being  a  member  of  the 
Communist  Party. 

"Czerniawski  also  admitted  he  had  subscribed  to  the  People's 
Daily  World  and  In  Fact,  both  later  identified  as  publications  sympa- 
thetic to  the  Communist  cause.  But,  he  testified,  he  subscribed  to 
each  for  six  months,  'to  please  customers.' 

"The  hardware  dealer  testified  he  became  the  victim  of  a  whis- 
pering campaign  four  years  ago  and  it  climaxed  last  May  10th 
when  he  slapped  Thomas  in  the  face  for  calling  him  a  Communist. 

"He  told  the  Senate  committee  that  he  had  joined  the  I.  W.  0. 
to  take  advantage  of  its  insurance  benefits  at  a  time  of  economic 
difficulty.  The  group,  he  said,  collected  a  hundred  dollars  to  buy 
a  horse  for  an  impoverished  Czech  farmer,  while  he  was  a  member. 

"The  I.  W.  0.  was  branded  subversive  two  years  ago  and  dis- 
banded. Czerniawski  testified  his  insurance  is  still  in  force,  but  it 
is  now  paid  to  the  New  York  State  Insurance  Commissioner  who 
took  over  the  insurance  end  of  the  disbanded  group. 


40  UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

"  Thomas  told  the  three-man  state  probing  committee  that  he 
first  became  suspicious  of  subversion  in  Westminster  School  Dis- 
trict policies  when  he  learned  that  Czerniawski  was  a  member  of 
the  School  Improvement  Association. 

' '  The  association  backed  three  candidates  which  Thomas  opposed 
editorially  in  the  May  election.  The  candidates,  LeRoy  King,  Mar- 
shall D.  Schulzstad  and  Mrs.  Genevieve  Mashburn,  were  elected  to 
office  in  the  biggest  turnout  of  voters  in  Westminster  history. 

"  Thomas  also  described  how  he  came  by  the  labels  of  'cloak  and 
dagger  editor'  and  'peek-a-boo  editor.'  His  description,  accom- 
panied by  hearty  but  somewhat  stifled  laughs  from  the  senators 
and  guffaws  from  the  audience,  involved  how  he  was  caught  late 
in  March  eavesdropping  on  a  meeting  of  the  members  of  the  Im- 
provement Association. 

"Thomas  was  caught  in  the  attic  of  the  I.  0.  0.  F.  hall  in  West- 
minster. With  him  were  Ralph  Edwards,  30,  Westminster  bean 
rancher,  and  a  juvenile.  They  were  caught  with  infrared  photo 
equipment  for  taking  photos  undetected  at  night,  binoculars  and 
exhaustive  notes. 

"At  the  conclusion  of  his  testimony  the  publisher  admitted  that 
thus  far  his  investigation  has  produced  no  evidence  of  possible 
subversion  other  than  Czerniawski 's  record,  but  that  his  probe 
would  continue." 

An  examination  of  the  transcript  of  this  hearing  does  not  indicate 
any  description  by  Mr.  Thomas  of  how  he  became  known  as  a  "cloak 
and  dagger  editor ' '  or  the  ' '  peek-a-boo  editor. ' '  Neither  were  the  mem- 
bers of  the  committee  so  discourteous  as  to  laugh  at  his  testimony  con- 
cerning his  experience  in  the  attic  when  he  endeavored  to  ascertain 
what  was  taking  place  at  the  meetings  of  the  School  Improvement  Asso- 
ciation. The  transcript  does  not  contain  anything  showing  that  Thomas 
presented  any  evidence  which  he  charged  would  implicate  Mr.  Czer- 
niawski with  the  Communist  Party,  nor  did  Senator  Burns  or  anyone 
else  connected  with  the  committee  give  the  individuals  connected  with 
the  hearing  a  "clean  bill."  All  of  these  things  set  forth  in  the  article 
above,  can  be  attributed  neither  to  Senator  Burns  nor  to  anything  that 
transpired  at  the  hearing. 

Mr.  Thomas  made  it  amply  clear  during  his  testimony,  and  the  com- 
mittee also  wishes  to  emphasize  that  he  conducted  his  investigation 
solely  on  his  own  initiative  and  at  no  time  worked  either  for  the  com- 
mittee or  under  its  direction.  He  merely  ascertained  that  he  was  not 
welcome  at  the  organization  of  the  School  Improvement  Association 
nor  at  any  of  its  subsequent  meetings,  decided  that  something  must  be 
wrong,   conducted  an  investigation   entirely   on   his   own,    discovered 


UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  41 

Czerniawski  's  involvement  with  the  Independent  Progressive  Party,  the 
International  Workers  Order,  and  the  Daily  People's  World  and  con- 
cluded that  the  matter  should  be  brought  to  the  attention  of  the  com- 
mittee. Ordinarily  this  matter  would  not  have  been  made  the  subject 
of  a  separate  hearing  without  a  detailed  investigation  initiated  by  the 
committee  itself.  Because  of  the  relatively  small  size  of  the  City  of  "West- 
minster and  the  intense  feeling  created  by  the  entire  matter,  and  in 
consideration  of  the  letters  and  telephonic  requests  received  by  the  com- 
mittee from  parties  representing  both  sides  and  asking  for  a  public 
hearing,  the  committee  decided  that  the  matter  should  be  explored  when 
it  was  having  a  hearing  on  other  subjects  in  Los  Angeles. 

It  is  quite  obvious  that  no  evidence  was  produced  which  would  either 
establish  the  membership  of  Mr.  Czerniawski  in  the  Communist  Party 
or  his  active  participation  as  a  member  of  a  Communist-controlled  or- 
ganization. The  fact  remains,  however,  that  he  did  subscribe  to  the 
Communist  newspaper  and  to  a  pro-Communist  magazine,  that  he  affil- 
iated with  a  "political"  party  which  was  also  under  the  domination  of 
the  Communist  Party  in  California,  and  that  he  continued  his  member- 
ship in  one  of  the  most  potent  Communist  front  organizations  in  the 
United  States  for  a  period  of  18  years. 

The  International  Workers  Order  has  been  operating  in  the  United 
States  since  1930.  It  is  an  insurance,  fraternal  and  propaganda  agency 
and  during  the  first  four  years  of  Mr.  Czerniawski 's  affiliation  with  it, 
was  headed  by  Max  Bedacht,  ex-general  secretary  of  the  Communist 
Party  of  the  United  States,  a  former  member  of  its  National  Executive 
Committee,  a  frequent  visitor  to  the  Soviet  Union  and  an  affiliate  with 
innumerable  Communist  front  organizations.  As  we  pointed  out  in  the 
1951  report  of  this  committee,  Mr.  Bedacht,  himself,  described  the  or- 
ganization as  follows : 

"Our  main  concern  is  that  our  proletarian  fraternal  organiza- 
tion, the  International  Workers  Order,  can  make  the  workers  class- 
conscious  *  *  *  this  problem  is  of  the  greatest  importance.  It  is  one 
of  the  major  problems  of  Communist  leadership  in  all  nonparty 
mass  organizations. 

' '  The  development  of  its  members  into  militant  trade  unionists  or 
Communists  thus  becomes  a  natural  result  of  the  correct  function- 
ing of  the  International  Workers  Order.  *  *  *  The  Communists, 
rather,  develop  and  lead  struggles  for  immediate  achievements 
because  they  are  concerned  with  creating  a  revolution.  *  *  *  The 
Communists  organize  mass  economic  strikes  by  the  workers  them- 
selves, mass  picketing  by  the  workers  themselves,  mass  demonstra- 
tions by  the  workers  themselves,  mass  defense  by  political  strikes 
by  the  workers  themselves.   *  *  *  The  I.  W.  0.  is  an  organization 


42  UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

that  allows  Communist  leadership  to  drive  its  roots  into  the  un- 
charted depths  of  the  American  working  masses.  *  *  *  The  build- 
ing of  the  I.  W.  0.  is  therefore,  one  of  the  most  important  tasks  of 
the  Communist  Party. ' ' 

The  I.  W.  0.  has  been  used  not  only  for  the  purpose  of  raising  huge 
amounts  of  money  for  Communist  purposes  in  this  Country  and  for 
propagandizing,  but  it  has  also  been  used  as  a  very  important  medium 
for  the  bringing  together  of  racial  minority  groups  and  recruiting  them 
into  the  Communist  Party  itself.  It  is  extremely  difficult  to  see,  in  view 
of  the  known  fact  that  the  organization  was  controlled  by  the  Commu- 
nist Party  from  top  to  bottom,  was  swarming  with  party  members,  that 
its  meetings  were  held  in  an  atmosphere  of  Marxism  and  Communist 
recruiting  techniques,  and  that  its  very  purpose  was  to  introctrinate  its 
members  with  Communism,  how  any  person  could  be  a  member  of  it  for 
a  period  of  years  without  having  some  sort  of  an  idea  of  its  real  nature. 

Several  years  ago  this  committee  received  evidence  of  how  the  Inter- 
national Workers  Order  was  being  utilized  in  connection  with  a  Com- 
munist technique  for  protecting  its  agents.  Every  International  Workers 
Order  Lodge  in  the  United  States  had  its  own  staff  of  physicians,  and 
members  of  the  organization  were  referred  to  these  doctors  not  only 
for  medical  service  but  frequently  for  advice  concerning  political  mat- 
ters. These  International  Workers  Order  physicians  cared  for  the  health 
of  the  top-level  party  functionaries  throughout  the  United  States,  and 
in  the  event  one  of  them  toppled  over  and  died  suddenly  from  a  heart 
attack  the  International  Workers  Order  would  provide  the  ambulance, 
the  physician,  the  mortuary,  the  death  certificate,  and  the  report  of  a 
cremation.  In  many  instances  governmental  agencies  were  extremely 
skeptical  and  pondered  the  question  of  whether  or  not  the  known  Com- 
munist agent  was  really  deceased,  or  whether  his  death  and  cremation 
were  reported  to  spring  him  loose  for  important  underground  activities. 

Several  years  ago  the  committee  also  had  a  conference  with  the  Insur- 
ance Commissioner  of  the  State  of  California,  produced  evidence  of  the 
subversive  nature  of  the  International  Workers  Order,  and  the  organi- 
zation was  not  thereafter  permitted  to  carry  on  an  insurance  business 
in  this  State.  Simultaneously  there  was  a  case  pending  in  the  courts  of 
New  York,  brought  by  the  Insurance  Commissioner  of  that  State  for 
the  purpose  of  proving  his  allegations  that  the  I.  W.  0.  was  in  fact 
subversive  and  Communist-dominated.  The  court  found  in  favor  of  the 
commissioner,  and  since  the  head  office  of  the  I.  W.  0.  was  in  the  State 
of  New  York,  all  of  the  members  who  remained  in  the  organization  after 
its  subversive  character  had  been  printed  many  times  in  official  publica- 
tions, were  told  to  send  their  contributions  to  the  New  York  Corporation 
Commissioner. 


UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES   IN    CALIFORNIA  43 

Iii  connection  with  the  testimony  of  Mr.  Czerniawski  to  the  effect  that 
he  regards  the  organization  simply  as  an  insurance  concern,  it  may  be 
well  to  quote  the  remarks  of  Mr.  Louis  P.  Budenz,  a  former  member 
of  the  Communist  National  Committee  of  the  United  States  and  former 
editor  of  its  New  York  Publication,  The  Daily  Worker.  In  the  March, 
1951,  issue  of  the  American  Legion  Magazine  Mr.  Budenz  wrote : 

"An  I.  W.  0.  lodge,  indeed,  cannot  be  distinguished  in  its 
political  tone  from  a  Communist  Party  branch.  They  look  alike, 
talk  alike  and  act  alike.  It  was  my  function  along  with  other  Red 
leaders  to  visit  I.  ~W.  0.  lodges  and  give  'educational'  talks  there. 
These  were  nothing  other  than  the  straight-out  Red  incitations 
against  the  United  States,  always  wrapped  up  in  the  current 
language  laid  down  by  Moscow.  Many  a  night  I  was  out  talking  to 
the  I.  "W.  0.  members  in  exactly  the  same  accents  and  the  same 
intent  as  do  the  'card-carrying'  Red  members. 

"I  went  into  these  lodge  meetings  as  the  official  representative 
of  the  National  Committee  of  the  Communist  Party,  was  intro- 
duced as  one  having  Red  authority,  and  laid  down  the  law  just  as 
I  did  in  party  branches.  When  J.  Edgar  Hoover  of  the  F.  B.  I. 
recently  told  the  Senate  Committee  on  Appropriations  of  the  five 
hundred  thousand  'Red  sympathizers'  aiding  the  subversive  acts 
of  the  Soviet  fifth  column,  he  undoubtedly  had  these  I.  W.  0.  first 
in  mind. 

"The  indictment  which  could  be  drawn  up  against  the  I.  W.  0. 
as  one  of  Stalin's  leading  agencies  for  subversion  would  be  ex- 
tensive and  detailed.  The  continuance  of  'language'  groups  and 
divisions  in  an  'insurance'  set-up  becomes  increasingly  artificial 
in  the  America  of  today.  But  in  the  I.  W.  0.  it  enabled  a  constant 
interweaving  relationship  with  foreign  agents  from  abroad,  such 
as  alleged  seamen  of  Greek,  Polish,  Romanian  and  other  nationali- 
ties. It  is  largely  in  order  to  facilitate  the  work  of  spying  upon 
our  defenses  that  fifteen  nationally  groups,  societies  and  general 
lodges  have  been  maintained  by  I.  W.  0.  on  a  national  level. 

"Of  course,  there  has  been  another  reason  for  this  preoccupation 
with  'language'  groups,  both  in  the  I.  W.  0.  and  in  the  Communist 
Party  itself.  If  the  Reds  could  play  upon  the  isolated  feelings  of 
many  immigrants  they  would  be  able  to  use  these  people  for  alien 
purposes,  just  as  they  seek  to  turn  the  Negro  against  America  and 
to  make  the  Mexican-American  feel  that  he  is  a  member  of  a 
'conquered'  people.  That  is  what  caused  the  I.  W.  0.  to  advertise 
rather  extensively  in  the  Red-created  Slav  papers  in  this  country. 
It  was  out  of  such  financing,  plus  the  recruiting  from  the  L  W.  (>.. 


44  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

that  the  Soviet  fifth  column  was  able  to  create  so  rapidly  the 
American-Slav  Congress  when  Moscow  ordered  such  action. 

"From  my  experience  as  a  leading  Communist,  I  can  charge 
that  every  foreign  language  division  within  this  'fraternal'  or- 
ganization had  an  espionage  apparatus  of  some  sort  operating 
within  it.  Perhaps  the  leader  of  all  was  the  Polonia  Society,  the 
Polish  section  of  the  I.  W.  0.,  led  by  Boleslaw  Gebert.  This  amaz- 
ing Stalinist  agent,  who  served  as  district  leader  of  the  Communist 
Party  in  the  mid-west  in  the  early  thirties,  and  then  became  the 
underground  director  of  Red  infiltration  into  the  steel  and  auto- 
mobile unions,  remained  an  alien  in  this  country  for  fully  20  years. 
All  efforts  to  deport  him  failed,  and  he  stands  out  as  one  of  the 
scores  of  Moscow  espionage  representatives  who  exercised  extensive 
power  in  this  country  while  disdaining  American  citizenship.  To 
my  personal  knowledge  Gebert  not  only  obtained  vital  secrets 
pertaining  to  our  military  aircraft,  but  ran  an  extensive  espionage 
ring." 

The  committee  pointed  out  in  1951  that  the  I.  W.  0.  then  had  81 
lodges  in  California,  was  licensed  to  conduct  an  insurance  business  in 
this  State,  and  as  of  1950  had  8,495  insurance  certificates  in  force, 
$5,438,710  in  insurance  policies  in  force,  and  that  it  received  $123,- 
762.80  from  its  members  in  California  alone.  As  we  have  stated,  the 
committee  produced  evidence  before  the  Insurance  Commissioner  of  this 
state  which  led  him  to  take  action  which  prevents  the  I.  W.  0.  from 
pursuing  its  activities  within  the  borders  of  California. 

The  Daily  People's  World  is  the  propaganda  organ  for  the  Communist 
Party  on  the  Pacific  Coast.  Its  principal  office  is  located  in  San  Fran- 
cisco, and  it  maintains  an  extremely  active  branch  office  in  Los  Angeles. 
Until  late  in  1937  this  publication  was  known  as  the  Western  Worker, 
and  its  masthead  proclaimed  that  it  was  the  official  organ  for  the  Com- 
munist Party,  a  section  of  the  Communist  International.  When  it 
changed  its  name  to  the  Daily  People's  World  the  control,  the  editorial 
policy,  the  propaganda  content,  the  assiduous  following  of  the  Inter- 
national Communist  Party  line  remained  identical.  Its  former  editor  in 
chief,  Harrison  George,  has  declared  that  the  editorial  policy  of  the 
publication  was  actually  determined  by  the  organizer  for  the  Com- 
munist Party  of  California — Mr.  William  Schneiderman,  who  stands 
convicted  for  violation  of  the  Smith  Act.  The  paper,  being  designed 
for  the  sole  purpose  of  carrying  the  party  line  and  spreading  Marxian 
propaganda,  would  obviously  be  worthless  to  the  Communist  apparatus 
unless  its  objectives  were  expressed  in  the  columns  of  the  paper  with 
such  clarity,  such  vehemence,  and  in  such  context  that  the  effect  would 
not  be  lost  upon  even  the  most  casual  reader. 


UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  45 

No  one  could  possibly  scan  even  the  headlines  of  this  publication  with- 
out instantly  becoming  aware  of  its  character.  Even  the  advertisements 
are  couched  in  the  unmistakable  language  of  the  Marxian  left.  Naturally, 
the  International  Workers  Order,  as  well  as  all  of  the  other  numerous 
front  organizations  that  are  so  important  to  the  Communist  organiza- 
tion are  mentioned  almost  daily.  The  publication  maintains  a  constant 
and  vicious  attack  against  the  United  States  Department  of  Justice, 
the  Federal  Bureau  of  Investigation,  the  Immigration  and  Naturaliza- 
tion Service,  all  police  agencies,  all  legislative  committees  investigating 
Communism,  and  sneering  criticism  of  the  foreign  policy  of  the  United 
States.  At  the  same  time  the  publication  expresses  profound  sympathy 
for  every  Communist  Party  member,  whether  an  espionage  agent,  a 
propagandist,  a  chronic  joiner  of  front  organizations,  a  fellow-traveler, 
or  a  rank  and  file  member  of  the  party,  in  case  such  an  individual  be- 
comes the  target  for  prosecution  because  of  a  violation  of  some  estab- 
lished law.  The  Soviet  Union  and  the  satellite  countries  are  constantly 
eulogized,  and  Red  China  occupies  a  place  in  the  esteem  of  this  publica- 
tion only  second  to  the  Soviet  Union.  It  is  also  a  well  established  fact 
that  all  members  of  Communist  front  organizations,  as  well  as  all  party 
members,  are  constantly  urged  to  subscribe  for  the  Daily  People's  World 
and  to  read  it  assiduously. 

Until  a  few  years  ago  the  newspaper  was  openly  delivered  through 
the  United  States  mail.  In  recent  years,  however,  it  is  usually  delivered 
in  bundles  by  courier,  and  then  picked  up  by  its  subscribers  at  a  cen- 
tral location.  This  practice,  of  course,  is  in  harmony  with  the  party's 
decision  to  go  underground  and  to  take  every  means  to  protect  the  iden- 
tity of  its  members  with  the  exception  of  those  Communists  who  are 
deliberately  left  on  the  surface  and  directed  to  handle  the  newspaper 
itself,  the  front  organizations  and  the  propaganda  machinery.  These 
individuals  are  considered  expendable,  and  regard  themselves  as  Com- 
munist martyrs.  Thus  the  Daily  People's  World  is  not  simply  a  liberal  or 
progressive  newspaper.  Its  contents  are  not  couched  in  such  language 
as  would  fool  a  grammer  school  student  of  ordinary  common  intelli- 
gence. The  paper  takes  brazen  pride  in  openly  criticizing  our  govern- 
ment, extolling  the  Soviet  Union  and  its  satellite  nations,  and  is  so 
arrogantly  pro-Communist  in  its  content  that  the  most  cursory  reading 
would  reveal  it  for  what  it  actually  is :  the  propaganda  medium  for  the 
Communist  Party  of  the  Pacific  Coast. 

The  publication  In  Fad  was  known  for  years  for  its  decidedly  pro- 
Communist  character.  This  committee  has  mentioned  it  in  reports  issued 
in  1943,  1948  and  1949.  Its  editor,  George  Seldes,  wrote  such  insulting 
letters  about  and  directly  to  J.  Edgar  Hoover  that  the  latter  was  moved 
to  reply  in  an  exchange  of  personal  correspondence  that  effetcively  put 


46  UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

Mr.  Seldes  in  his  place.  The  magazine,  defunct  for  several  years,  con- 
sistently carried  the  Communist  Party  line,  gave  every  sort  of  aid  and 
comfort  to  the  Communist  cause,  and  while  not  quite  so  obviously  a 
propaganda  medium  as  the  Daily  People's  World,  could  not  possibly  be 
read  with  any  degree  of  thoroughness  without  disclosing  its  sympathy 
toward  Communism  in  this  country. 

The  Independent  Progressive  Party  in  California  was  quickly  cap- 
tured by  the  Communists,  and  by  the  time  the  "Wallace  for  President 
campaign  had  swung  into  high  gear  was  being  operated  lock  stock 
and  barrel  by  the  Communist  Party  of  California.  Time  after  time 
the  committee  in  questioning  witnesses  throuhgout  the  State  discovered 
that  the  leaders  of  the  Communist  Parties  in  various  localities  were 
identical  with  the  leaders  of  the  Independent  Progressive  Party  in  the 
same  area.  It  is  true,  of  course,  that  in  the  Independent  Progressive 
Party  there  were  many  sincere  liberals  who,  because  of  dissatisfaction 
with  the  two  major  political  organizations  registered  as  Independent 
Progressives  and  continued  their  affiliation  until  the  true  control  of  the 
I.  P.  P.  became  obvious.  These  people  invariably  resigned,  many  of 
them  having  given  the  benefit  of  their  experience  to  various  official 
agencies  interested  in  the  exposure  of  subversive  activities.  As  has 
already  been  pointed  out,  the  head  of  the  I.  P.  P.  in  California  since 
its  inception  was  Hugh  Bryson,  president  of  the  Marine  Cooks  and 
Stewards  Union,  and  now  under  indictment  for  having  falsely  sworn 
that  he  was  not  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party. 

The  Communist  control  of  the  Independent  Progressive  Party  soon 
became  so  pronounced  and  so  arrogant  that  it  drove  the  sincere  liberals 
from  its  ranks,  leaving  only  a  handful  of  the  most  fanatic.  This  exodus 
from  the  organization  grew  to  such  an  extent  that  at  the  last  state-wide 
political  election  in  which  Independent  Progressive  Party  candidates 
were  eligible  to  participate,  the  voting  strength  of  the  organization  fell 
so  far  below  the  state  requirement  that  it  could  not  qualify  as  a  politi- 
cal party  in  California. 

Mr.  Czerniawski  stated  to  the  committee  positively  and  clearly  that 
he  had  never  joined  the  Communist  Party.  Whether  the  International 
Workers  Order  meetings  that  he  attended  created  a  predilection  for 
publications  and  politics  of  a  pro-Communist  flavor  we  cannot  tell.  It 
is  quite  plain,  however,  that  he  did  subscribe  to  the  Communist  news- 
paper; that  he  did  subscribe  to  the  pro-Communist  publication  In  Fact, 
and  that  he  did  affiliate  with  the  Communist-controlled  Independent 
Progressive  Party. 

We  then  have  a  situation  wherein,  because  of  local  interest  in  school 
affairs,  attention  became  focused  upon  the  personnel  of  the  newly- 
created  School  Improvement  Association  in  Westminster.  Mr.  Thomas, 


UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  47 

obviously  irked  because  he  was  not  well  received  by  the  association  and 
because  he  was  told  flatly  that  he  would  not  be  welcome  at  its  meetings, 
stubbornly  dug  away  at  Czerniawski  's  record  and  found  that  he  had, 
indeed,  subscribed  to  Communist  publications  and  joined  two  Commu- 
nist-controlled organizations. 

The  committee  prefers  not  to  comment  on  the  wisdom  of  Mr.  Thomas' 
attic  activities — any  more  than  upon  Mr.  Czerniawski 's  motives  in  mak- 
ing his  choice  of  reading  material  and  affiliating  with  the  International 
Workers  Order  and  the  Independent  Progressive  Party.  The  episode 
in  the  "Westminster  pharmacy  seems  to  epitomize  the  personal  charac- 
teristics of  the  two  principals:  Mr.  Thomas'  accusations  against  Mr. 
Czerniawski,  and  the  latter 's  violent  reaction  thereto. 

The  committee  can  do  no  more  than  to  recite  the  facts.  "We  feel  that 
the  issues  have  been  well  clarified  and,  as  Senator  Burns  stated  in  Sep- 
tember, 1954,  the  School  Improvement  Association  had  a  perfect  right 
to  organize  and  conduct  any  critical  activity  concerning  the  educational 
system  in  Westminster,  or  any  school  political  activity  it  desired.  There 
is  no  evidence  that  the  organization  engaged  in  any  subversive  activity 
whatever.  As  a  public  minded  citizen  and  a  newspaper  editor,  it  was 
not  unnatural  for  Mr.  Thomas  to  interest  himself  both  in  the  local 
educational  problems,  the  School  Improvement  Association,  and  its 
personnel.  Further,  it  is  not  unnatural  for  such  a  person  to  become 
concerned  over  possible  subversive  influences  in  the  educational  system 
of  the  community.  Whether  Mr.  Thomas  exercised  the  proper  wisdom 
in  so  zealously  pursuing  his  investigation,  or  whether  he  should  have 
turned  the  matter  over  to  some  official  agency,  is  a  matter  for  the  deter- 
mination of  anyone  who  reads  the  facts  in  the  case.  The  same  reason- 
ing may  be  applied  to  Mr.  Czerniawski 's  wisdom  in  making  the  affilia- 
tions and  subscribing  to  the  publications  concerned  which  he  testified. 
There  was  no  proof  produced  by  anyone  to  show  that  Mr.  Czerniawski 
was  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party,  and  he  stated  under  oath  that 
he  had  never  made  such  an  affiliation. 

As  Senator  Burns  stated  in  his  comment  to  the  Santa  Ana  Register  last 
September,  the  hearing  was  purely  exploratory.  In  the  event  that 
further  substantial  evidence  is  developed  showing  any  subversive  activ- 
ity on  the  part  of  any  member  of  the  School  Improvement  Association 
or  in  connection  with  the  educational  system  of  Westminster,  the  com- 
mittee will  stand  ready  to  make  such  investigation  or  hold  such  hear- 
ing as  the  facts  may  warrant. 


THE  CASE  OF  DORIS  BRIN  WALKER 

On  January  18,  1955,  the  Supreme  Court  of  the  State  of  California 
rendered  a  decision  which  is  so  far  reaching  in  its  effect  and  which  so 
clarifies  the  law  in  this  State  regarding  the  broad  aspects  of  Communist 
activities  in  general  and  the  right  and  duty  of  an  employer  to  discharge 
a  Communist  employee  in  particular,  that  the  committee  feels  war- 
ranted in  dealing  with  this  decision  at  some  length.  In  addition,  some 
of  the  organizations  and  individuals  mentioned  in  the  body  of  the 
decision  have  long  been  familiar  to  the  committee,  and  we  will  endeavor 
to  indicate  something  of  the  nature  of  the  intricate,  carefully  planned, 
interlocking  aspects  of  the  Communist  strategy  in  this  State  to  insinu- 
ate of  its  members  in  some  of  our  most  sensitive  and  strategic  positions. 

The  Cutter  Laboratories,  Inc.,  is  situated  in  Berkeley  and  engaged  in 
producing  vaccines,  serums,  antitoxins,  blood  plasma  and  antibiotics 
for  both  civilian  and  military  use  and  for  both  domestic  and  foreign 
consumption.  During  World  War  II  the  laboratories  were  supplying 
huge  quantities  of  its  products  to  our  armed  forces,  and,  since  it  was 
peculiarly  vulnerable  to  sabotage,  was  operated  under  the  strictest 
security  measures  imposed  by  federal  authorities. 

In  February,  1944,  the  Bio-Lab  Union  Local  225,  United  Office  and 
Professional  Workers  of  America,  CIO,  was  recognized  by  the  labora- 
tories pursuant  to  a  National  Labor  Relations  Board  election. 

The  history  of  this  union  is  positively  fascinating.  It  was  originally 
known  as  the  Union  of  Technical  Men.  Its  founder,  Marcel  Scherer, 
was  a  New  York  Communist  of  such  ability  as  an  industrial  chemist 
and  of  such  unusual  devotion  to  the  Communist  Party  that  he  was 
sent  to  Moscow  for  special  training  at  the  Lenin  Institute  for  sabotage 
and  espionage  specialists.  He  lost  no  time  in  launching  this  techni- 
cians union  upon  returning  to  the  United  States.  It  was  Communist 
inspired,  created  and  operated — having  been  conceived,  as  has  been 
seen,  in  Moscow.  The  organization  grew  rapidly  and  soon  changed  its 
name  to  the  International  Federation  of  Architects,  Engineers,  Chem- 
ists and  Technicians.  Its  membership  comprised  the  various  technical 
categories  denoted  by  its  title,  together  with  nuclear  physicists,  drafts- 
men, aeronautical  engineers  and  other  types  of  scientific  personnel.  In 
1939  it  instituted  Chapter  25  at  Berkeley,  California. 

In  its  1945  report,  our  committee  described  this  organization  in  con- 
siderable detail:  how  it  infiltrated  its  nuclear  physicist  members 
throughout  our  secret  A-bomb  project  at  the  University  of  California ; 
how  a  committee  informant  attended  meetings  of  this  Berkeley  Chap- 

(48) 


UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  49 

ter  25,  FAECT  and  heard  its  scientific  members  formulate  plans  to 
evade  FBI  detection  and  heard  some  of  them  express  a  longing  for  a 
Soviet  United  States  of  America;  how  this  Moscow-created  agency 
sifted  its  Communist  members  throughout  our  laboratories,  shipyards, 
aircraft  factories  and  secret  defense  projects. 

The  attorney  for  the  Berkeley  Chapter  25,  FAECT  was  Bertram 
Edises — also  attorney  for  Mrs.  Doris  Brin  Walker,  the  principal  figure 
in  this  case. 

Shortly  after  it  was  publicly  exposed  by  this  committee,  Chapter  25, 
FAECT  changed  its  number  to  225,  and  then  unobtrusively  merged 
with  the  United  Office  and  Professional  Workers  of  America.  Thus  this 
Local  225,  with  which  the  Cutter  Laboratories  became  involved  in  1946, 
was  nothing  more  nor  less  than  the  old  Moscow-conceived  Local  25, 
FAECT  with  a  new  number,  a  new  name,  with  the  same  complexion 
and  even  the  same  attorney.  It  may  appropriately  be  noted  in  passing 
that  Bertram  Edises  was  unceremoniously  pegged  for  a  Communist 
Party  member  by  no  less  an  authority  than  the  Daily  People's  World. 

These  facts  concerning  the  FAECT  and  its  metamorphosis  into  Bio- 
Lab  Union  225  of  the  United  Office  and  Professional  Workers  of  Amer- 
ica are  not  mentioned  in  the  Supreme  Court  decision,  although  the  court 
did  state  that  the  UOPWA  was  ousted  from  the  CIO  in  1950  because 
of  its  alleged  Communist-dominated  character. 

This  case  arose  because  Cutter  Laboratories  discharged  Doris  Brin 
Walker,  charging  that  she  was  believed  to  be  a  Communist  Party  mem- 
ber, and  also  because  she  deliberately  lied  on  her  application  for  a  job 
with  the  laboratories. 

Mrs.  Walker  attended  the  University  of  California  at  Berkeley  where 
she  made  an  outstanding  scholastic  record.  During  her  undergraduate 
years  she  was  elected  to  Phi  Beta  Kappa,  top  scholarship  society,  and 
in  law  school  her  excellence  earned  her  an  editorial  post  on  the  Califor- 
nia Law  Review.  Having  graduated,  passed  the  Bar  examination  and 
been  admitted  to  practice,  Mrs.  Walker  was  appointed  enforcement 
attorney  with  the  San  Francisco  Office  of  Price  Administration  in  1942, 
a  position  she  held  until  1944.  During  that  period  her  boss  was  former 
Congressman  Robert  L.  Condon,  who  became  chief  enforcement  attor- 
ney for  the  OPA  in  Northern  California  in  1942.  He  was  also  asso- 
ciated with  Bertram  Edises'  law  office  in  1947.  Edises,  the  attorney 
for  Mrs.  Walker  and  her  union,  had  served  in  Washington  as  enforce- 
ment officer  for  the  National  Labor  Relations  Board — having  resigned 
from  that  position  in  July,  1941.  Both  Edises  and  his  partner,  Treu- 
haft,  had  been  associated  in  San  Francisco  with  the  firm  of  Gladstein, 
Grossman,  Margolis  &  Sawyer.  So  had  Mrs.  Walker.  Gladstein  is  known 
chiefly  for  his  defense  of  Communists  and  Grossman  has  been  a  high 
Communist  functionary  for  many  years. 


50  UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

These  matters  were  not  mentioned  by  the  court,  but  we  feel  that 
they  are  vital  to  a  proper  understanding  of  the  patient  planning,  the 
long-range  strategy,  the  interlocking  aspects  of  Communist  technique 
in  infiltrating  and  controlling  our  most  strategic  institutions.  Go  back 
and  re-read  this  amazing  background;  for  if  we  only  printed  a  report 
of  a  dozen  pages  we  could  justify  it  easily  by  this  one  example.  Let  us 
now  analyze  it  in  summary : 

WALKER,  MRS.  DORIS  BRIN 

1942 — Graduated  from  University  of  California  School  of  Jurisprudence. 
1942-1944 — Appointed  enforcement  attorney  in  San  Francisco. 

1944-1945 — Worked  for  Gladstein,  Grossman,  Sawyer  &  Edises  to  handle  labor  cases. 
1946 — Worked  at  manual  labor  in  a  cannery  as  organizer  for  the  Communist-domi-, 

nated  Food,  Tobacco  and  Agricultural  Workers  of  America. 
1946,  October — Employed  by  Cutter  Laboratories,  Inc.,  Berkeley,  California. 
1949,   October  6th — Fired   by   Cutter   Laboratories   because   of   alleged   Communist 

Party  membership   and   for  making  deliberate   misstatements  in  her  application 

for  employment. 

CONDON,  ROBERT  L. 

1938 — Graduated  from  University  of  California  School  of  Jurisprudence. 
1938-1942— Attorney  for  National  Labor  Relations  Board. 
1942 — Chief  OPA  enforcement  attorney  for  Northern  California. 
1947 — Associated  with  the  law  firm  of  Edises  and  Treuhaft  in  Oakland. 
1953 — As  a  member  of  Congress,  barred  from  attending  atomic  bomb  tests  on  basis 
of  FBI   information  furnished  to  Atomic   Energy   Commission. 

EDISES,  BERTRAM 

1931 — Graduated   from   University  of   California,   Berkeley. 

1937 — Attorney  for  National   Labor  Relations  Board   at   Salinas,  California. 

1941 — Resigned    as    supervisor   of    National    Labor    Relations   Board    Enforcement 

Division   in   Washington,   D.   C,   to   become   associated   with   the   San   Francisco 

firm  of  Gladstein,  Grossman,  Margolis  and   Sawyer. 
1941 — Elected  as  alternate  member  of  the  Communist  State  Committee  of  California. 
1947 — Member,   Oakland  law  firm  of  Edises,   Treuhaft  and  Condon. 

TREUHAFT,  ROBERT 

1942 — Hearing  Commissioner,  Office  of  Price  Administration,  San  Francisco. 
1946 — Attorney  with  Gladstein,  Grossman,  Sawyer  and  Edises,  San  Francisco. 
1951,  July  1st — Speaker  at  Communist  meeting,   Oakland,  California. 

TREUHAFT,  MRS.  ROBERT 

1943 — -Employed  by  the  Office  of  Price  Administration  as  an  investigator  in  the 
Enforcement  Division,  San  Francisco. 

1944-1945 — Financial    Director,    Communist    School,    Oakland. 

1951 — Invoked  Fifth  Amendment  before  this  committee  in  San  Francisco  in  Sep- 
tember, 1951,  when  questioned  about  her  Communist  affiliations. 

Upon  being  discharged  by  her  employer,  Cutter  Laboratories,  Mrs. 
Doris  Brin  Walker  and  her  union  took  the  matter  up  with  an  abritra- 
tion  board.  A  hearing  was  duly  held  at  which  Mrs.  Walker  steadfastly 
refused  to  answer  any  questions  concerning  her  membership  in  the 
Communist  Party— one  of  the  express  reasons  why  she  had  been  fired. 
Prompted  by  her  counsel,  Edises,  Mrs.  Walker's  reasons  were  expressed 
as  follows : 


UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  51 

"Mr.  Edises:  Do  you  wish  to  explain  your  reasons  for  refusing 
to  answer? 

' '  The  Witness :  Yes,  it 's  very  simple.  I  consider  it  a  question  of 
an  absolutely  unwarranted  invasion  into  my  private  beliefs,  and 
I  know  that  it  is  nothing  but  a — the  whole  question  is  nothing  but 
a  red  herring  to  obscure  the  real  issue  in  the  case." 
(Appellant's  petition  for  hearing  by  the  Supreme  Court,  1  Civil 

No.  15223,  pages  33,  34.) 

In  commenting  on  this  matter  the  chairman  of  the  arbitration  board 
declared : 

"We  have  come  to  a  conclusion:  That  we  consider  this  question 
(of  Mrs.  Walker's  Communist  affiliation)  to  be  material.  The 
objection  is  overruled,  but  we  want  to  couple  the  ruling  with  a 
statement  of  the  board :  That  we  will  not  instruct  the  witness  to 
answer  if  she  does  not  care  to  answer  the  question,  and  she  is  at 
liberty  to  answer  it  or  not  to  answer  it  as  she  chooses.  If  she 
should  refuse,  her  refusal  to  answer  will  stand  in  the  record,  and 
as  in  any  case,  the  failure  of  a  party  to  produce  evidence  justifies 
the  fact-finding  board  in  drawing  inferences  from  it.  What  in- 
ferences we  will  draw  from  the  refusal  we  have  not  determined 
now,  and  we  will  let  that  await  final  determination  of  the  case. 

"Do  you  want  to  answer  the  question? 

' '  The  Witness :  No,  I  do  not,  Mr.  Arbitrator. 

"The  Chairman :  All  right."  (Ibid.,  page  15.) 

The  board  then  concluded  from  Mrs.  Walker's  refusal  to  answer 
any  questions  concerning  her  Communist  affiliations  and  activities  that 
she  was  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party.  It,  nevertheless,  ordered 
her  reinstated  for  other  reasons.  Cutter  Laboratories  appealed  to  the 
superior  court,  where  Judge  Edward  Molkenbuhr  sustained  the  board's 
findings.  Then  Judge  Raymond  Peters  of  the  First  District  Court  of 
Appeal  wrote  an  opinion  upholding  the  decision  of  Judge  Molkenbuhr. 
The  matter  was  then  submitted  to  the  State  Supreme  Court,  which 
reversed  the  decisions  by  the  inferior  tribunals  and  found,  in  effect, 
that  a  private  firm  has  not  only  the  right  but  the  duty  to  discharge  a 
Communist  employee — and  that  any  contractual  provision  which  would 
operate  to  prevent  such  an  action  is  contrary  to  public  policy  and 
therefore  void.  This  decision  was  written  by  Justice  Schauer  and  con- 
curred in  by  Justices  Shenk,  Edmonds  and  Spence.  Justice  Roger 
Traynor  prepared  the  minority  dissenting  opinion  which  was  shared 
by  Chief  Justice  Gibson  and  Justice  Carter. 

This  decision  will  produce  such  a  clarifying  effect  in  California  that 
we  quote  liberally  from  its  pertinent  sections.   The   committee  thus 


52  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

makes  this  vital  ease,  in  its  essential  elements,  available  to  the  public. 
Otherwise  it  would  only  be  accessible  to  such  lawyers  as  are  interested 
in  reading  decisions  of  this  character. 

MISREPRESENTATIONS  TO  GAIN  EMPLOYMENT 

When  Mrs.  Walker  applied  for  a  job  at  the  Cutter  Laboratories  she 
deliberately  made  a  series  of  false  statements  and  misrepresentations. 
She  filled  out  a  personnel  questionnaire  and  under  the  heading  ' '  Edu- 
cation" she  concealed  her  attendance  at  law  school,  her  law  degree 
and  her  admission  to  practice  law  in  California.  Under  the  heading 
"Previous  Employment"  she  concealed  her  entire  previous  employment 
record  and  showed  a  false  employment  as  file  clerk  for  six  or  eight 
months  in  1939  by  a  John  Trip,  attorney,  which  the  company  later  dis- 
covered to  be  a  fictitious  name.  Mrs.  Walker  also  gave  a  dentist  (Dr. 
William  R.  Berke)  and  a  lawyer  (Francis  McTernan)  in  San  Francisco 
as  references,  but  at  her  request  their  letters  of  recommendation  to  the 
company  did  not  reveal  her  subterfuge. 

It  was  pointed  out  in  appellant's  petition  to  the  Supreme  Court  that 
' '  Francis  McTernan  is  the  brother  of  John  Trip  McTernan,  with  whom 
petitioner  (Mrs.  Walker)  was  closely  associated  while  employed  by  the 
OPA  and  whose  first  and  middle  names  made  up  the  fictitious  employer, 
'John  Trip'."  This  was  admitted  by  Mrs.  Walker.  (Appellant's  peti- 
tion for  a  hearing  by  the  Supreme  Court,  op.  cit.,  page  8.) 

The  petition  continued:  "John  Trip  McTernan  is  listed  in  the 
Fourth  Report  of  the  Joint  Fact-Finding  Committee  of  the  Cali- 
fornia Legislature  on  Un-American  Activities  in  California  as 
having  entertained  members  of  the  Communist  Party  and  promi- 
nent Soviet  leaders  in  his  home.  (Company  exhibit  No.  13.)  Dr. 
William  R.  Berke  is  listed  in  a  schedule  of  classes  of  the  California 
Labor  (Communist)  School  reprinted  at  pages  428-432  of  the  fifth 
report  of  this  committee  as  being  an  instructor  in  a  course  at  that 
school  entitled,  '  The  Soviets — Fact  and  Myth.  Everyday  life  in  the 
Soviet  Union.  How  the  Soviets  look  at  the  world. ' 

"While  these  circumstances  of  association  might  have  little  sig- 
nificance standing  alone,  their  combination  with  the  admitted  facts 
that  both  Mr.  Francis  McTernan  and  Dr.  Berke,  at  considerable 
personal  risk,  cooperated  and  conspired  with  petitioner  (Mrs. 
Walker)  in  practicing  deliberate  deception  for  the  purpose  of 
establishing  petitioner  as  an  employee  in  a  vital  defense  plant 
leads  to  but  one  conclusion,  namely,  that  petitioner's  mission  was 
to  secure  a  position  at  the  Cutter  plant  and  in  the  union  with  the 
purpose  and  intent  of  'strengthening  the  party'  and  using  her 
position  to  further  the  Communist  Party's  program  of  'sabotage, 


UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  53 

force,  violence,  and  the  like'."  (Ibid.,  pages  8,  9.)    (Committee's 
italics.) 

No  sooner  had  Mrs.  Walker  landed  the  job  in  the  label  department 
of  the  laboratories  at  $160  a  month,  than  she  plunged  into  union  activi- 
ties. In  quick  succession  she  became  chairman  of  the  plant  unit,  a  mem- 
ber of  the  CIO  State  Executive  Board,  and  by  1949,  was  president  of 
the  union,  which  had  units  in  several  other  plants  in  the  East  Bay  area. 
In  her  capacity  as  shop  foreman,  executive  board  member  of  Local  225, 
and  especially  as  chief  shop  steward,  Mrs.  Walker  had  access  to  all 
parts  of  the  Cutter  plant.  By  concealing  her  brilliant  academic  back- 
ground, her  status  as  an  attorney,  her  experience  with  the  OPA  and 
her  affiliation  with  the  Gladstein  firm,  this  woman  posed  as  a  cannery 
worker  and  rank  and  file  union  member ;  with  her  talents  it  was  child- 
ishly simple  for  her  to  rise  to  a  position  of  influence  and  prestige  in 
this  offshoot  of  the  Moscow-hatched  union  of  scientists  whose  counsel 
was  a  Communist  official. 

In  commenting  on  Mrs.  Walker's  refusal  to  answer  questions  con- 
cerning her  Communist  membership  on  the  ground  that  they  were 
"unwarranted  invasions  into  my  private  beliefs,"  the  Supreme  Court 
declared :  ' '  The  evidence  as  to  her  Communist  membership  and  ac- 
ceptance of  party  principles,  with  all  the  implications  that  flow  there- 
from, thus  stands  unchallenged  and  uncontradicted  by  her  and  clearly 
supports  the  board's  finding  that  the  company  honestly  and  sincerely 
believed  her  to  be  a  knowing  and  deliberately  acting  Communist." 
(Supreme  Court  decision,  op.  cit.,  page  821.) 

The  Supreme  Court  also  made  some  extensive  comment  concerning 
the  shop-worn  claim  that  to  interfere  with  the  Communist  Party  or 
any  of  its  members  who  also  belonged  to  labor  unions  is  to  make  an 
unwarranted  inquiry  into  a  person's  political  affiliations.  The  Supreme 
Court 's  decision  on  this  phase  of  the  matter  was  as  follows : 

"It  was  further  found  by  the  board  that  the  company's  1947 
investigation  of  Mrs.  Walker  indicated  that  she  was  a  Communist 
and  also  disclosed  most  of  the  omissions  and  falsifications  in  her 
application  for  employment,  that  a  'strong  case'  had  been  made 
out  that  in  1948  the  company  learned  of  her  cannery  activities 
and  of  the  cannery  hearings  and  that  there  was  'at  least  a  gen- 
eral indifference  on  the  part  of  the  company  about  Doris  Walker 's 
activities  until  the  autumn  of  1949  and  a  specific  indifference  about 
obvious  *  *  *  clues  to  her  background. '  The  company  stated  that 
the  reason  they  did  not  discharge  Mrs.  Walker  in  1947  was  be- 
cause of  a  desire  to  '  lean  over  backward '  rather  than  to  be  accused 
of  harassing  union  officials  and "  because  company  attorneys  ad- 


54  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

vised  that  there  was  at  that  time  insufficient  evidence  to  support 
a  discharge. 

"Under  the  provisions  of  the  collective  bargaining  agreement  in 
effect  when  Mrs.  Walker  was  discharged,  the  company  had  agreed 
not  to  interfere  with,  restrain  or  coerce  employees  or  discriminate 
against  them  because  of  membership  or  lawful  activity  in  the  union. 
It  further  agreed  that,  except  for  personnel  reductions  for  lack  of 
work  or  to  effect  economies,  it  would  not  discharge  an  employee 
'except  for  just  cause.'  Both  the  union  and  the  company  also 
agreed  that  they  will  not  discriminate  against  'a  present  or  pro- 
spective employee  or  member  because  of  race,  color,  creed,  national 
origin,  religious  belief,  or  union  affiliation;'  formerly  'political' 
as  well  as  '  religious  belief '  was  listed  in  this  contract  provision,  but 
by  negotiation  the  word  'political'  was  amended  out  of  the  agree- 
ment. The  board  held  that  although  removal  of  the  word  'political' 
seemed  to  authorize  the  practice  of  discrimination  because  of  '  polit- 
ical belief, '  '  we  are  unable  to  conclude '  that  the  company 's  agree- 
ment not  to  discriminate  because  of  union  activity  and  not  to 
discharge  except  for  just  cause  were  thereby  limited  or  modified 
'in  such  a  way  as  to  dispose  of  this  dispute.'  In  this  connection  it 
is  to  be  noted  that  the  old  hoax  that  the  Communist  Party  is  but 
a  political  party  has  been  effectively  exposed,  as  is  hereinafter 
shown  in  some  detail.  (Committee's  italics.) 

"The  company  at  the  board  hearings  advanced  two  grounds  as 
the  basis  for  discharging  Mrs.  Walker :  '  The  omissions  and  falsifi- 
cations in  the  application  for  employment  and  membership  in  the 
Communist  Party  with  the  full  implications  of  dedication  to  sabo- 
tage, force,  violence  and  the  like,  which  party  membership  is 
believed  to  entail.'  Although  finding  that  the  company  'honestly 
believed  all  of  these  things, '  and  that  the  '  accuracy  of  those  beliefs 
is  established  in  the  record,'  the  board  further  found  that  the 
company  had  not  satisfactorily  explained  the  delay  of  two  years 
(from  1947  to  1949)  in  asserting  the  grounds  for  discharge  pre- 
sented to  the  board  and  that  such  grounds  were  therefore  stale,  j 
Finally,  it  was  found  by  the  board  that  the  reasons  assigned  by  the 
company  were  not  its  real  reasons  for  discharging  Mrs.  Walker,,1 
and  that  actually  the  discharge,  which  occurred  during  wage  nego-j 
tiations,  was  'retaliatory  in  nature'  and  'interfered,  restrained, 
and  coerced  an  employee  because  of  participation  as  an  officer  and 
negotiator  on  behalf  of  the  union  in  a  wage  negotiation. '  As  already, 
stated,  the  board's  award,  based  on  the  above  findings,  was  that, 
the  company's  discharge  of  Mrs.  Walker  violated  the  collective 
bargaining  contract  provisions  against  discrimination  because  of: 


UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  55 

anion  activity  and  against  discharging  except  for  just  cause,  and 
that  she  is  entitled  to  reinstatement  and  to  limited  back  pay.  The 
company  failed  to  comply  with  the  award,  the  union  petitioned  the 
superior  court  for  its  confirmation,  and  the  company  asked  the 
court  that  it  be  vacated. ' ' 
(See  Code  Civ.  Proc,  Sections  1287,  1288.) 

After  a  hearing  the  trial  court  confirmed  the  award,  and  this  appeal 
by  the  company  followed : 

"Section  1288  of  the  Code  of  Civil  Procedure  provides,  so  far 
as  here  material,  that  'in  either  of  the  following  cases  the  superior 
court  *  *  *  must  make  an  order  vacating  the  award,  upon  the 
application  of  any  party  to  the  arbitration :  *  *  * 

"  '(b)   Where  the  arbitrators  exceeded  their  powers.  *  *  *  ' 

"As  ground  for  reversal  the  company  contends,  among  other 
things  and  as  it  contended  before  the  trial  court  in  seeking  vacation 
of  the  award,  that  an  arbitration  award  which  directs  that  a  mem- 
ber of  the  Communist  Party  who  is  dedicated  to  that  party's  pro- 
gram of  'sabotage,  force,  violence  and  the  like'  be  reinstated  to 
employment  in  a  plant  which  produces  antibiotics  used  by  both 
the  military  and  civilians  is  against  public  policy,  as  expressed  in 
both  federal  and  state  laws,  is  therefore  illegal  and  void  and  will 
not  be  enforced  by  the  courts.  With  this  contention  we  agree. 
(Committee's  italics.) 

"In  the  case  of  Loving  and  Evans  v.  Blick  (1949),  33  Cal.  2d  603 
(204P.  2d  23),  this  court  reversed  a  judgment  confirming  an  arbi- 
trator's award  of  a  disputed  sum  owing  under  a  building  contract 
where  it  appeared  that  only  one  of  the  partners  of  the  contracting 
firm  was  licensed  as  required  by  statute,  and  that  neither  the  other 
party  nor  the  partnership  held  such  a  license.  After  referring  to 
the  principles  that  (p.  607)  'a  contract  made  contrary  to  the  terms 
of  a  law  designed  for  the  protection  of  the  public  and  prescribing 
a  penalty  for  the  violation  thereof  is  illegal  and  void,  and  no  action 
may  be  brought  to  enforce  such  contract'  and  that  (p.  609)  'ordi- 
narily with  respect  to  arbitration  proceedings  "the  merits  of  the 
controversy  between  the  parties  are  not  subject  to  judicial  review" 
(citation)  and  that  "arbitrators  are  not  bound  by  strict  adherence 
to  legal  procedure  and  to  the  rules  on  the  admission  of  evidence 
expected  in  judicial  trials,"  '  it  was  held  (p.  610)  that  the  'power 
of  the  arbitrator  to  determine  the  rights  of  the  parties  is  dependent 
upon  the  existence  of  a  valid  contract  under  which  such  rights 
might  arise.'  That  'section  1281  of  the  Code  of  Civil  Procedure, 
providing  for  submission  to  arbitration  of  ' '  any  controversy  *  *  * 
which  arises  out  of  a  contract,"  does  not  contemplate  that  the 


56  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

parties  may  provide  for  the  arbitration  of  controversies  arising  out 
of  contracts  which  are  expressly  declared  by  law  to  be  illegal  and 
against  the  public  policy  of  the  state,'  that  (p.  611)  'an  unlawful 
transaction  cannot  be  given  legal  vitality  by  the  arbitration  proc- 
ess,' that  (p.  614)  'the  only  evidence  before  the  trial  court  showed 
without  contradiction  that  the  contract  upon  which  the  award  was 
based  was  illegal  and  void  because  of  respondent's  failure  to  com- 
ply with  the  licensing  requirements,  and  that  therefore  the  court 
had  erred  in  confirming  the  award.  And  in  Franklin  v.  Nat  C. 
Goldston  Agency  (1949),  33  Cal.  2d  628,  630-633  (204P.  2d  37),  a 
judgment  confirming  an  arbitration  award  in  favor  of  unlicensed 
contractors  was  likewise  reversed  upon  the  ground  that  the  basic 
contract  was  illegal  because  in  violation  of  the  statutes  and  of  'the 
public  policy  of  this  State. ' 

"It  is  at  once  apparent  that  the  controversy  now  before  us  pre- 
sents an  even  stronger  case  for  refusal  to  confirm  the  award  than 
was  involved  in  the  Loving  and  Evans  and  in  the  Franklin  cases. 
There  the  illegality  was  held  to  exist  in  the  contracts  upon  which 
the  awards  were  based,  while  here  the  very  award  itself  is  illegal 
in  that  it  orders  reinstatement  as  an  employee  of  one  whose  dedi- 
cation to  and  active  support  of  Communist  principles  and  practices 
stands  proved  and  unchallenged  in  the  record.  As  is  hereinafter 
shown,  the  true  implications  of  knowing  membership  in  and  sup- 
port of  the  Communist  Party  are  no  longer  open  to  doubt,  and  the 
long  overworked  party  line  theme  that  Communism  is  but  a  political 
activity  has  been  exposed  as  a  false  and  fraudulent  strategem  de- 
signed particularly  as  a  device  for  securing,  in  the  free  nations 
having  government  by  law,  legal  support  for  the  'party'  in  carry- 
ing on  to  the  end  of  its  illegal  objectives.  (Committee's  italics.) 

"The  Congress  of  the  United  States,  in  adopting  the  Internal 
Security  Act  of  1950,  declared  the  dangers  of  the  Communist 
movement  in  the  following  terms  (Act  of  Sept.  23,  1950,  Ch.  1024, 
Title  I,  Sec.  2,  64  Stats.  987;  50  U.  S.  C.  A.  Sec.  781)  : 

"  'As  a  result  of  evidence  adduced  before  various  committees  of 
the  Senate  and  House  of  Representatives,  the  Congress  finds 
that — :  (1)  There  exists  a  world  Communist  movement  which  in 
its  origin,  its  development,  and  its  present  practice,  is  a  world- 
wide revolutionary  movement  whose  purpose  it  is,  by  treachery, 
deceit,  infiltration  into  other  groups  (governmental  and  other- 
wise), espionage,  sabotage,  terrorism,  and  any  other  means  deemed 
necessary,  to  establish  a  Communist  totalitarian  dictatorship  in  the 
countries  throughout  the  world  through  the  medium  of  a  world- 
wide Communist  organization. 


UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  57 

"  '(2)  The  establishment  of  a  totalitarian  dictatorship  in  any- 
country  results  in  the  suppression  of  all  opposition  to  the  party  in 
power,  the  subordination  of  the  rights  of  individuals  to  the 
state,  the  denial  of  fundamental  rights  and  liberties  which  are 
characteristic  of  a  representative  form  of  government,  such  as  free- 
dom of  speech,  of  the  press,  of  assembly  and  of  religious  worship, 
and  results  in  the  maintenance  of  control  over  the  people  through 
fear,  terrorism,  and  brutality.  *  *  * 

"  '  (9)  In  the  United  States  those  individuals  who  knowingly 
and  wilfully  participate  in  the  world  Communist  movement,  when 
they  so  participate,  in  effect  re-dedicate  their  allegiance  to  the  for- 
eign country  in  which  is  vested  the  direction  and  control  of  the 
world  Communist  movement.  *  *  * 

"  '(15)  The  Communist  movement  in  the  United  States  is  an 
organization  numbering  thousands  of  adherents,  rigidly  and  ruth- 
lessly disciplined.  Awaiting  and  seeking  to  advance  a  movement 
when  the  United  States  may  be  so  far  extended  by  foreign  engage- 
ments, so  far  divided  in  counsel,  or  so  far  in  industrial  or  financial 
straits,  that  overthrow  of  the  government  may  seem  possible  of 
achievement,  it  seeks  converts  far  and  wide  by  an  extensive  system 
of  schooling  and  indoctrination.  Such  preparations  by  Communist 
organizations  in  other  countries  have  aided  in  supplanting  existing 
governments.  The  Communist  organization  in  the  United  States, 
pursuing  its  stated  objectives,  the  recent  successes  of  Communist 
methods  in  other  countries,  and  the  nature  and  control  of  the 
world  Communist  movement  itself,  present  a  clear  and  present 
danger  to  the  security  of  the  United  States  and  to  the  existence  of 
free  American  institutions,  and  make  it  necessary  that  Congress, 
in  order  to  provide  for  the  common  defense,  to  preserve  the  sov- 
ereignty of  the  United  States  as  an  independent  nation,  and  to 
guarantee  to  each  state  a  republican  form  of  government,  enact 
appropriate  legislation  recognizing  the  existence  of  such  world- 
wide conspiracy  and  designed  to  prevent  it  from  accomplishing  its 
purpose  in  the  United  States. ' 

"  And  in  the  Smith  Act  (Act  of  June  25,  1948,  Ch.  645,  62  Stats. 
808 ;  18  U.  S.  C.  A.  Sec.  2385),  it  was  provided  that  'whoever  know- 
ingly or  wilfully  advocates,  abets,  advises,  or  teaches  the  *  *  * 
overthrowing  or  destroying  the  Government  of  the  United  States 
or  *  *  *  of  any  state  *  *  *  by  force  or  violence,  or  *  *  *  who- 
ever organizes  or  helps  or  attempts  to  organize  any  society,  group, 
or  assembly  of  persons  who  *  *  *  encourage  the  overthrow  or  de- 
struction of  any  such  government  by  force  or  violence ;  or  becomes 


58  UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

or  is  a  member  of,  or  affiliates  with,  any  such  *  *  *  assembly  of 
persons,  knowing  the  purposes  thereof '  is  guilty  of  a  crime. 

"More  recently,  in  adopting  the  Communist  Control  Act  of 
1954  (Public  Law  637,  Ch.  886,  approved  August  24,  1954),  our 
Congress  further  expressed  its,  and  necessitates  our,  awareness  of 
the  true  nature  of  the  party  program  and  methods  in  these  find- 
ings of  fact : 

"  'Sec.  2.  The  Congress  hereby  finds  and  declares  that  the 
Communist  Party  of  the  United  States,  although  purportedly  a 
political  party,  is  in  fact  an  instrumentality  of  a  conspiracy  to 
overthrow  the  government  of  the  United  States.  It  constitutes  an 
authoritarian  dictatorship  within  a  republic,  demanding  for  itself 
the  rights  and  privileges  accorded  to  political  parties,  but  denying 
to  all  others  the  liberties  guaranteed  by  the  Constitution.  Unlike 
political  parties,  which  evolve  their  policies  and  programs  through 
public  means,  by  the  reconciliation  of  a  wide  variety  of  individual 
views,  and  submit  those  policies  and  programs  to  the  electorate  at 
large  for  approval  or  disapproval,  the  policies  and  programs  of  the 
Communist  Party  are  secretly  prescribed  for  it  by  the  foreign 
leaders  of  the  world  Communist  movement.  Its  members  have  no 
part  in  determining  its  goals,  and  are  not  permitted  to  voice  dis- 
sent to  party  objectives.  Unlike  members  of  political  parties,  mem- 
bers of  the  Communist  Party  are  recruited  for  indoctrination  with 
respect  to  its  objectives  and  methods,  and  are  organized,  in- 
structed, and  disciplined  to  carry  into  action  slavishly  the  assign- 
ments given  them  by  their  hierarchial  chieftans.  Unlike  political 
parties,  the  Communist  Party  acknowledges  no  constitutional  or 
statutory  limitations  upon  its  conduct  or  upon  that  of  its  mem- 
bers. The  Communist  Party  is  relatively  small  numerically,  and 
gives  scant  indication  of  capacity  ever  to  attain  its  ends  by  lawful 
political  means.  The  peril  inherent  in  its  operation  arises  not  from 
its  numbers,  but  from  its  failure  to  acknowledge  any  limitation  as 
to  the  nature  of  its  activities,  and  its  dedication  to  the  proposition 
that  the  present  constitutional  government  of  the  United  Sates 
ultimately  must  be  brought  to  ruin  by  any  available  means,  includ- 
ing resort  to  force  and  violence.  Holding  that  doctrine,  its  role  as 
the  agency  of  a  hostile  foreign  power  renders  its  existence  a  clear 
present  and  continuing  danger  to  the  security  of  the  United 
States.  It  is  the  means  whereby  individuals  are  seduced  into  the 
services  of  the  world  Communist  movement,  trained  to  do  its  bid- 
ding, and  directed  and  controlled  in  the  conspiratorial  perform- 
ance of  their  revolutionary  services.  Therefore,  the  Communist 
Party  should  be  outlawed. ' 


UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  59 

"A  similar  awareness  was  shown  by  the  President  of  the  United 
States  in  his  State  of  the  Union  message  delivered  before  a  joint 
session  of  the  Senate  and  House  of  Representatives  on  January  7, 
1954  (100  Congressional  Record  62,  H.  Doe.  251),  wherein  he  de- 
clared, 'The  subversive  character  of  the  Communist  Party  in  the 
United  States  has  been  clearly  demonstrated  in  many  ways,  in- 
cluding court  proceedings.  We  should  recognize  by  law  a  fact  that 
is  plain  to  all  thoughtful  citizens — that  we  are  dealing  here  with 
action  akin  to  treason — that  when  a  citizen  knowingly  participates 
in  the  Communist  conspiracy  he  no  longer  holds  allegiance  to  the 
United  States.' 

"And  in  this  State  the  courts  have  recognized  that  the  type  of 
activity  found  by  the  board  here  to  have  been  engaged  in  by  Mrs. 
Walker — i.e.,  membership  'in  the  Communist  Party  with  the  full 
implications  of  dedication  to  sabotage,  force,  violence  and  the  like, 
which  party  membership  is  believed  to  entail' — constitutes  a  viola- 
tion of  the  California  Criminal  Syndicalism  Act  (Pen.  Code,  Sees. 
11400-11402,  formerly  Deering's  Gen.  Laws,  Act  8428;  see  People 
v.  McCormiek  (1951),  102  Cal.  App.  2d  Supp.  954,  962  (228  P.  2d 
349);  People  v.  Chambers  (1937),  22  Cal.  App.  2d  687,  709-713, 
(72  P.  2d  746). 

"The  Legislature  of  California  itself  has  found  as  fact,  and  has 
so  declared  in  Sec.  1027.5  of  the  Government  Code,  that  '*  *  * 
(a)   There  exists  a  world-wide  revolutionary  movement  to  estab- 
lish  a  totalitarian   dictatorship  based  upon  force   and   violence 
rather  than  upon  law. 

"  '(d)  Within  the  boundaries  of  the  State  of  California  there 
are  active  disciplined  Communist  organizations  presently  function- 
ing for  the  primary  purpose  of  advancing  the  objectives  of  the 
world  Communist  movement,  which  organizations  promulgate, 
advocate,  and  adhere  to  the  precepts  of  the  principles  and  doc- 
trines of  the  world  Communism  movement.  These  Communist 
organizations  are  characterized  by  identification  of  their  programs, 
policies,  and  objectives  with  those  of  the  world  Communist  move- 
ment, and  they  regularly  and  consistently  cooperate  with  and  en- 
deavor to  carry  into  execution  programs,  policies  and  objectives 
substantially  identical  to  programs,  policies,  and  objectives  as  such 
world  Communism  movement.  *  *  * 

' '  '  There  is  a  clear  and  present  danger,  which  the  Legislature  of 
the  State  of  California  finds  is  great  and  imminent,  that  in  order 
to  advance  the  program,  policies  and  objectives  of  the  world  Com- 
munism movement,  Communist  organizations  in  the  State  of  Cali- 
fornia and  their  members  will  engage  in  concerted  effort  to  ham- 


60  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

per,  restrict,  interfere  with,  impede,  or  nullify  the  efforts  of  the 
state  and  the  public  agencies  of  the  state  to  comply  with  and  en- 
force the  laws  of  the  State  of  California  *  *  *   ' 

"Further  evidencing  the  implications  of  membership  in  the 
Communist  Party  and  the  policy  of  the  state  in  respect  thereto, 
the  Legislature  has  declared  that  (Gov.  Code,  Sec.  1028)  :  'It 
shall  be  sufficient  cause  for  the  dismissal  of  any  public  employee 
when  such  public  employee  advocates  or  is  knowingly  a  member 
of  the  Communist  Party  or  of  an  organization  which  during  the 
time  of  his  membership  he  knows  advocates  overthrow  of  the 
government  of  the  United  States  or  of  any  state  by  force  or 
violence.'  (See  also  Board  of  Education  v.  Wilkinson  (1954)  125 
Cal.  App.  2d  100  (270  P.  2d  82). 

"A  private  employer,  particularly  one  largely  engaged  in  sup- 
plying manufactured  products  to  the  government,  to  its  armed 
forces,  and  to  retailers  for  distribution  through  hospitals  and  doc- 
tors to  the  public  at  large,  should  not  be  required  by  state  action 
through  its  courts  (see  Shelley  v.  Kraemer  (1948),  344  U.  8.  1  (68 
8.  Ct.  836,  92  L.  Ed.  1161,  3  A.  L.  R.  2d  441;  Hurd  v.  Hodge 
(1948)),  334  U.  8.  24,  68  S.  Ct.  847,  92  L.  Ed.  1187)  to  retain  in 
or  restore  to  employment  a  person  who  would  not  be  entitled  to 
state  employment  and  who  is  known  to  have  dedicated  herself  to  the 
service  of  a  foreign  power  and  to  the  practice  of  sabotage  to  the  end 
of  overthrowing  our  government.  (Committee's  italics.) 

"Graphically  depictive  of  the  nature  of  the  Communist  con- 
spiracy and  of  the  extremes  to  which  it  is  prepared  to  resort  are 
the  following  statements  by  Mr.  Justice  Jackson,  concurring  in 
Dennis  v.  United  States  (1951),  341  U.  S.  494,  564-565,  71  S.  Ct. 
857,  95  L.  Ed.  1137,  1191),  'The  Communist  Party,  nevertheless, 
does  not  seek  its  strength  primarily  in  numbers.  Its  aim  is  a  rela- 
tively small  party  whose  strength  is  in  selected,  dedicated,  indoc- 
trinated, and  rigidly  disciplined  members.  From  established  policy 
it  tolerates  no  deviation  and  no  debate.  It  seeks  members  that  are, 
or  may  be,  secreted  in  strategic  posts  in  transportation,  communica- 
tions, industry,  government,  and  especially  in  labor  unions  where 
it  can  compel  employers  to  accept  and  retain  its  members.  It  also 
seeks  to  infiltrate  and  control  organizations  of  professional  and 
other  groups.  Through  these  placements  in  positions  of  power  it 
seeks  a  leverage  over  society  that  will  make  up  in  power  of  co- 
ercion what  it  lacks  in  power  of  persuasion. 

' '  '  The  Communists  have  no  scruples  against  sabotage,  terrorism, 
assassination,  or  mob  disorder;  but  violence  is  not  with  them,  as 
with  the  anarchists,  an  end  in  itself.  The  Communist  Party  advo- 


UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  61 

cates  force  only  when  prudent  and  profitable.  Their  strategy  of 
stealth  precludes  premature  or  uncoordinated  outbursts  of  violence, 
except,  of  course,  when  the  blame  will  be  placed  on  shoulders  other 
than  their  own.  They  resort  to  violence  as  to  truth,  not  as  a  princi- 
ple but  as  an  expedient.  Force  or  violence,  as  they  would  resort  to 
it,  may  never  be  necessary,  because  infiltration  and  deception  may 
be  enough. 

11  'Force  would  be  utilized  by  the  Communist  Party  not  to 
destroy  government  but  for  its  capture.  The  Communist  recognizes 
that  an  established  government  in  control  of  modern  technology 
cannot  be  overthrown  by  force  until  it  is  about  ready  to  fall  of  its 
own  weight.  Concerted  uprising,  therefore,  is  to  await  that  con- 
tingency and  revolution  is  seen,  not  as  a  sudden  episode  but  as  the 
consummation  of  a  long  process. ' 

"Other  instances  of  recognition  by  the  courts  of  the  clear  and 
present  danger  to  this  Country  and  to  its  institutions  presented  by 
the  Communist  Party  and  its  adherents  may  be  found  in  the  deci- 
sions upholding  the  provisions  of  the  Labor  Management  Relations 
Act  of  1947,  also  known  as  the  Taft-Hartley  Act  (Act,  June  23, 
1947,  Ch.  120,  Sec.  1,  et  seq. ;  61  Stats.  136  et  seq. ;  29  U.  S.  C.  A. 
Sec.  141  et  seq.),  which  deny  the  privilege  of  being  chosen  as  ex- 
clusive bargaining  agent  to  a  union  whose  officers  have  not  filed 
with  the  National  Labor  Relations  Board  their  affidavits  denying 
membership  or  affiliation  with  the  Communist  Party  and  denying 
belief  in  the  overthrow  of  the  United  States  Government  by  force 
(see  American  Communications  Assn.,  C.  I.  0.  v.  Bonds  (1950),  339 
U.  S.  382,  70  S.  Ct.  674,  94  L.  Ed.  925 ;  National  Maritime  Union 
of  America  v.  Eerzog  (D.  0.,  1948),  78  F.  Supp.  146,  affirmed  334 
U.  S.  854,  68  S.  Ct.  1529,  92  L.  Ed.  1776;  Inland  Steel  Co.  v. 
National  Labor  Relations  Board,  C.  C.  A.  7,  1948,  170  F.  2d  247, 
264-267,  affirmed  339  U.  S.  382,  70  S.  Ct.  674,  94  L.  Ed.  925),  as 
well  as  in  cases  sustaining  other  legislation  or  congressional  inquiry 
directed  at  exposing  and  controlling  Communist  activities  in  this 
Country.  (See  Lawson  v.  United  States,  C.  C.  A.,  D.  C,  1949,  176 
F.  2d  49,  certiorari  denied,  339  U.  S.  934,  70  S.  Ct,  663,  94  L.  Ed. 
1352;  United  States  v.  Bennis,  C.  C.  A.,  2,  1950,  183  F.  2d  201, 
212-213,  affirmed,  Bennis  v.  United  States,  1951,  supra,  341  U.  S. 
494,  71  S.  Ct.  857,  95  L.  Ed.  1137;  Barsky  v.  United  States, 
C.  C.  A.,  D.  C,  1948,  167  F.  2d  241,  247,  certiorari  denied,  334 
U.  S.  843,  68  S.  Ct.  1511,  92  L.  Ed.  1767 ;  Galvan  v.  Press,  1953, 
347  U.  S.  552,  529,  74  S.  Ct.  737,  98  L.  Ed.  911).  In  the  Bonds 
case,  supra,  the  court  pointed  out  that  before  enacting  the  Taft- 
Hartley  Act '  Congress  had  a  great  mass  of  material  before  it  which 
tended  to  show  that  Communists  and  others  proscribed  by  the 


62  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

statute  had  infiltrated  union  organizations  not  to  support  and 
further  trade  union  objectives,  including  the  advocacy  of  change 
by  democratic  methods,  but  to  make  them  a  device  by  which  com- 
merce and  industry  might  be  disrupted  when  the  dictates  of 
political  policy  required  such  action.'  (P.  389  of  339  U.  S.) 

"Also  relevant  are  the  following  comments  of  the  court  in 
Garner  v.  Board  of  Public  Works,  1950,  98  Cal  App.  2d  493,  498, 
220  P.  2d  958,  affirmed,  1951,  341  U.  S.  716,  71  S.  Ct.  909,  95  L.  Ed. 
1317,  in  upholding  an  ordinance  requiring  a  loyalty  oath  for 
municipal  employees:  'One  of  the  foundation  stones  of  private 
business  is  that  the  employee  must  be  loyal  to  his  employer.  Loy- 
alty is  implicit  in  the  contract  of  hiring.  No  private  business  can 
long  succeed  without  the  conscientious,  undivided  support  of  its 
employees.  The  man  or  woman  who  denies  allegiance  to  his  employ- 
ment is,  and  should  be,  soon  separated  from  it  *  *  *  and,  so  long 
as  the  employment  continues,  every  employer  has  the  right  at  any 
time  to  ask  his  employee  to  declare  his  loyalty. '  To  the  same  effect 
is  the  holding  in  National  Labor  Relations  Board  v.  International 
Brotherhood  of  Electrical  Workers,  1953,  346  U.  S.  464,  472,  74 
S.  Ct.  172,  98  L.  Ed.  195,  'there  is  no  more  elemental  cause  for 
discharge  of  an  employee  than  disloyalty  to  his  employer.'  (See 
also  National  Labor  Relations  Board  v.  Jones  and  Laughlin  Steel 
Corp.,  1937,  301  U.  S.  1,  45-46,  57  S.  Ct.  615,  81  L.  Ed.  893,  108 
A.  L.  R.  1352 ;  RKO  Radio  Pictures,  Inc.  v.  Jarrico,  1945,  128  Cal. 
App.  2d,  274  P.  2d  928).  From  the  array  of  congressional  and 
legislative  findings  which  have  been  quoted  above,  if  not  from  the 
common  knowledge  of  mankind,  it  must  be  accepted  as  conclusively 
established  that  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party  cannot  be 
loyal  to  his  private  employer  as  against  any  directive  of  his  Com- 
munist master.  (Committee's  italics.) 

' '  We  are  of  the  view,  further,  that  the  type  of  activity  engaged 
in  by  the  employee  here — membership  in  the  Communist  Party 
and  sustained  participation  in  its  activities — is  one  which  as  a 
matter  of  public  policy  the  company  should  not  be  held  to  have 
waived  by  its  failure  to  discharge  her  earlier  than  it  did.  In  the 
first  place,  it  is  an  established  principle  that  parties  cannot  be 
estopped  from  relying  on  defenses  based  on  considerations  of 
public  policy,  such  as  illegal  contracts.  In  the  second  place*,  the 
employee's  party  membership  was  not  shown  or  even  asserted 
by  her  to  have  been  an  instance  of  past  error  but  appears,  rather, 
to  have  been  the  studied  and  calculated  choice  of  a  person  of  some 
intellectual  attainment,  and  to  have  been  persisted  in  on  an  active 
and  devoted  basis  even  at  the  time  of  the  board  hearings.  Thus 


UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  63 

an  entirely  adequate  ground  for  refusing  to  employ  her  (whether 
by  original  refusal  to  hire  or  by  discharge)  was  a  continuing  one 
which  was  available  to  the  employer  at  any  time  during  its  exist- 
ence. In  this  connection  it  may  also  he  noted  that  the  employer 
had  not  only  the  right  to  protect  itself  and  its  customers  against 
the  clear  and  present  danger  of  continuing  a  Communist  Party 
member  in  its  employ,  but  also  the  duty  to  take  such  action  as  it 
deemed  wise  to  preserve  order  in  its  plant  and  to  protect  its  other 
employees,  loth  union  and  nonunion,  against  the  same  danger  and 
the  possibility  of  'sabotage,  force,  violence  and  the  like.'  (Com- 
mittee's italics.) 

''The  company  properly  stated  in  its  notice  of  discharge  as 
related  above,  'the  nature  of  our  company's  business  requires  more 
than  the  usual  precaution  against  sabotage  and  subversion.  Upon 
a  disclosure  that  any  employee  is  a  member  of  the  Communist 
Party  *  *  *  we  conceive  it  to  be  the  responsibility  of  management 
to  take  action.'  Knowing  the  facts  which  the  company  knew,  it 
is  difficult  to  conceive  of  any  tenable  defense  which  it  could  make, 
or  which  would  be  entertained  in  this  court,  as  against  an  action 
for  damages  in  a  personal  injury  or  wrongful  death  case  arising 
from  the  wilful  adulteration  of  any  of  its  products  by  Mrs.  Walker 
if  it  continued  her  in  its  employ  and  she  should  thereafter  take  that 
means  of  party  activity.  That  acts  of  sabotage  by  Communists 
are  reasonably  to  be  expected  at  any  time  such  acts  may  be  directed 
by  the  party  leader  is  not  open  to  question,  as  has  already  been 
shown.  (Committee's  italics.) 

"The  fact  that  the  company  was  not  specifically  obliged  by  any 
governmental  regulation  to  discharge  Mrs.  Walker  affects  in  no 
wise  its  right  to  do  so  or  the  impelling  public  policy  which  militates 
against  the  order  for  her  reinstatement;  in  this  country,  built  as 
it  has  been  on  the  initiative  and  self-reliance  of  its  citizens,  the 
Government  is  expected  to  step  in  only  where  the  employer  has 
failed  or  is  unable  to  act  for  himself,  and  he  is  not  obligated  to 
await  a  governmental  decree  before  taking  steps  to  protect  himself 
or  to  exercise  his  right  to  discharge  employees  who  upon  the  estab- 
lished facts  are  dedicated  to  be  disloyal  to  him,  to  be  likewise 
disloyal  to  the  American  labor  union  they  may  purport  to  serve, 
and  who  constitute  a  continuing  risk  to  both  the  employing  com- 
pany and  the  public  depending  upon  the  company's  products. 

"This  is  not  the  first  time  that  this  court  has  been  called  upon 
to  recognize  and  give  specific  effect  to  the  public  policy  where  its 
duty  in  the  premises  is  clear.  (Citing  authorities.) 


64  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

"Lastly,  in  the  light  of  the  undisputed  evidence  and  of  the 
specific  findings  of  fact  made  by  the  arbitration  board,  it  clearly 
appears  that  the  conclusional  finding  that  Mrs.  Walker  was  dis- 
charged because  of  her  labor  union  activities  is  untenable.  We  have 
here  an  exemplification  of  that  which  Justice  Jackson  (in  Dennis 
v.  United  States,  1941,  supra,  341  U.  S.  494,  564,  71  S.  Ct.  857, 
95  L.  Ed.  1137,  1191)  so  clearly  envisaged  when  he  said  of  the 
Communist  Party :  '  From  established  policy  it  tolerates  no  devia- 
tion and  no  debate.  It  seeks  members  that  are,  or  may  be  secreted 
in  strategic  posts  in  *  *  *  industry  *  *  *  and  especially  in  labor 
unions  where  it  can  compel  employers  to  accept  and  retain  its 
members,'  and  of  that  to  which  the  court  referred  when  it  stated 
in  American  Co)iirmcnications  Assn.,  C.  I.  0.  v.  Douds,  1950, 
supra,  339  U.  S.  382,  389,  70  S.  Ct.  674,  94  L.  Ed.  925:  'Congress 
(in  enacting  the  Taft-Hartley  Act)  had  a  great  mass  of  material 
before  it  which  tended  to  show  that  Communists  and  others  pro- 
scribed by  the  statute  had  infiltrated  union  organizations  not  to 
support  and  further  trade  union  objectives  *  *  *  but  to  make 
them  a  device  by  which  commerce  and  industry  might  be  disrupted 
*  *  *  .'  The  issue  of  labor  union  activity  herein  is  manifestly  a 
false  one,  a  subterfuge  injected  not  to  promote  the  cause  of 
American  labor  but  to  further  the  Communist  Party  line.  Mrs. 
Walker,  as  a  Communist,  was  not  at  any  time  nor  in  any  of  her 
activities  truly  serving  the  cause  of  an  American  labor  union  or 
the  interests  of  an  American  laboring  man ;  she  was  but  doing 
the  bidding  and  serving  the  cause  of  her  foreign  master  who 
'tolerates  no  deviation  and  no  debate.'  Her  activities,  therefore, 
upon  any  reasonable  view  of  the  evidence  and  the  specific  findings 
of  fact,  were  not  in  truth  union  labor  activities  but  were  Com- 
munist Party  activities. 

"Of  no  small  significance  in  this  connection  is  the  fact  that  at 
the  arbitration  board  hearing  Mrs.  Walker  was  asked,  and  she 
refused  to  answer  the  question,  'isn't  it  a  fact,  Mrs.  Walker  *  *  * 
that  the  reason  why  you  sought  employment  *  *  *  in  Cutter  Lab- 
oratories was  because  you  felt  and  believed,  and  had  it  in  mind, 
that  obtaining  that  employment  at  that  plant  you  could  more 
actively  and  more  effectively  carry  on  the  program  and  the  activi- 
ties of  the  Communist  Party?'  It  is,  we  think,  indisputable  that 
if  Mrs.  Walker  sought  and  obtained  employment  at  Cutter 
Laboratories  so  that  she  'could  more  actively  and  more  effectively 
carry  on  the  program  and  the  activities  of  the  Communist  Party,' 
her  reinstatement  in  that  employment  would  serve  no  cause  save 
that  of  the  Communist  conspiracy.  The  courts  of  this  Country  by 


UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  65 

making  such  an  order  would  be  but  aiding  toward  destruction  of 
the  government  they  are  sworn  to  uphold.  The  contract  between 
Cutter  Laboratories  and  the  Bio-Lab  Union  cannot  be  construed, 
and  will  not  be  enforced,  to  protect  activities  by  a  Communist  on 
behalf  of  her  party  whether  in  the  guise  of  unionism  or  otherwise." 
(Committee's  italics.) 


WILKINSON  AND  EISENBERG  CASES 
In  September  and  October,  1952,  this  committee  held  hearings  in  Los 
Angeles  relative  to  certain  employees  of  the  Housing  Authority  of  that 
city.  Two  of  the  witnesses  who  were  subpenaed  to  testify  were  Jean 
Benson  Wilkinson,  a  teacher  in  the  East  Los  Angeles  Girls  Vocational 
High  School,  and  Frances  Eisenberg,  an  officer  in  the  Los  Angeles  Fed- 
eration of  Teachers,  Local  430,  and  also  a  teacher  in  the  Los  Angeles 
school  system.  Each  of  the  witnesses  was  questioned  concerning  alleged 
Communist  Party  activities  and  affiliations,  and  each  invoked  the  Fifth 
Amendment  and  refused  to  answer  any  questions  concerning  this  sub- 
ject. The  Los  Angeles  City  Board  of  Education  promptly  moved  to 
discharge  both  of  these  employees,  and  they  resorted  to  the  courts  for 
reinstatement. 

In  rendering  a  decision  in  the  Wilkinson  case  the  California  District 
Court  of  Appeals  held  (Board  of  Education  v.  Wilkinson,  125  Cal. 
App.  2d  100,  106-107)  that  the  school  board  had  a  perfect  right  to  dis- 
charge any  teacher  or  other  employee  who  refused  to  answer  questions 
propounded  by  this  committee  concerning  her  Communist  affiliations. 
The  opinion,  in  part,  is  as  follows : 

' '  In  the  lif e-and-death  struggle  into  which  our  people  have  been 
plunged  by  the  monstrous  conspiracy  called  Communism,  it  is  be- 
coming more  and  more  apparent  that  it  is  essential  for  the  con- 
tinuance of  our  national  life  that  we  know  who  is  for  us  and  who  is 
against  us.  This  is  no  time  to  allow  any  person  who  would  destroy 
us,  our  liberties,  our  religious  convictions,  and  our  government  to 
be  employed  in  any  branch  of  that  government — 'to  bite  the  hand 
that  feeds  it.'  The  men  and  women  of  America  who  pay  their 
salaries  have  a  right  to  know  whether  or  not  any  of  their  employees 
are  Communists." 

In  passing  upon  the  action  of  Mrs.  Eisenberg,  the  court  also  upheld 
the  right  of  the  Los  Angeles  City  Board  of  Education  to  discharge  a 
teacher  who  refused  to  answer  questions  put  by  this  committee  concern- 
ing Communist  activities  and  affiliations  (129  A.C.A.  868,  at  page  877). 
In  discussing  the  resolution  whereby  this  committee  was  created,  and 
which  prescribes  its  scope  of  authority,  the  court  said: 

"The  Legislature  having  determined,  as  did  the  Los  Angeles 
Board  of  Education,  that  the  infiltration  of  Communism  is  detri- 
mental to  the  general  welfare,  it  did  the  next  logical  thing  by  send- 
ing out,  as  its  emissaries,  committees  to  ascertain  the  extent  of  the 

(66) 


UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  67 

detriment  caused  and  likely  to  be  caused  by  advocates  or  prowlers 
for  Communism.  There  is  nothing  un-American  in  such  action.  It  is 
done  to  protect  the  United  States  and  every  subdivision  thereof. 
No  attempt  is  made  to  bridle  free  speech.  The  resolution  means  no 
more  than  'stand  up  and  be  counted.'  It  makes  no  interdiction 
against  any  person's  saying  whatever  he  desires  to  say.  It  is  de- 
signed to  give  the  Legislature  a  knowledge  of  social  conditions  pre- 
vailing in  California  whereby  to  make  laws  intelligently.  *  *  *" 

The  committee  has  seen  fit  to  set  forth  these  recent  legal  decisions  not 
only  for  the  purpose  of  dispelling  a  great  deal  of  Communist  propa- 
ganda nonsense  concerning  the  power  of  the  State  Legislature  and  the 
propriety  of  its  committee  inquiring  into  Communist  activities  through- 
out the  State,  and  not  only  to  widely  disseminate  these  decisions  and 
make  them  available  to  the  public  and  the  press,  but  also  to  counteract  a 
great  deal  of  false  information  constantly  being  spread  among  deluded 
progressives  and  fellow-travelers  by  that  well  known  little  group  of 
attorneys  in  this  State  who  have  been  known  to  this  committee  for  al- 
most 16  years  for  their  constant  loyalty  and  devotion  to  members  of  the 
Communist  Party  and  to  the  Communist  Party  itself.  These  attorneys, 
many  of  whom  have  been  identified  as  party  members,  are  responsible 
for  a  widespread  dissemination  of  utter  nonsense  concerning  the  true 
state  of  the  law  in  these  matters  and  who  are  constantly  exhorting  their 
clients  and  their  followers  to  defy  constituted  authority.  The  committee 
trusts  that  these  decisions,  hereby  made  available  through  the  medium 
of  this  report,  may  effectively  counteract  such  propaganda. 

The  recital  of  these  facts  whereby  Doris  Walker — brilliant,  capable, 
dedicated — used  her  talents  for  the  purpose  of  furthering  the  cause  of 
international  Communism,  is  literally  packed  with  grim  warning.  This 
girl  plunged  into  the  Communist  conspiracy  immediately  upon  graduat- 
ing from  the  law  school  of  the  state  university.  She  emerged  from  that 
institution  as  a  fanatic  representative  of  a  group  pledged  to  undermine 
our  government  and  to  pervert  our  way  of  life.  Why,  indeed,  was  she 
selected  to  worm  her  way  into  the  particular  concern  for  which  she 
worked?  Why  was  she  designated  to  emerge  as  the  leader  of  a  union 
which  had  been  conceived  at  the  Lenin  School  ? 

We  are  reminded  of  a  similar  case  that  occurred  a  few  years  ago  in 
California.  It  came  to  our  attention  that  a  former  editor  of  the  Daily 
People's  World  had  disappeared  from  public  view.  He  had  left  his  home 
in  San  Francisco  and  literally  vanished  into  thin  air.  An  investigation 
disclosed  that  he  had  obtained  a  position  as  a  telegraph  operator  for  one 
of  our  great  railroad  systems,  and  in  this  sensitive  position  had  been 
assigned  to  various  locations  that  were  clearing  centers  for  large  move- 
ments of  freight.  The  position  was  obtained  by  the  use  of  a  cover  organ- 


68  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

ization,  the  giving  of  fictitious  information,  and  a  use  of  strategem  and 
device  to  insure  employment  in  this  particular  capacity  much  as  Doris 
Walker  concealed  material  facts  from  her  employer  in  order  to  land  the 
desired  job.  In  the  case  of  the  telegraph  dispatcher  it  is  quite  obvious 
that  any  sudden  movement  of  vast  quantities  of  strategic  materials, 
such  as  molybdenum,  uranium  ore,  tanks,  airplane  parts,  or  other  crit- 
ical supplies,  would  provide  information  of  enormous  potential  value  to 
a  potential  enemy.  Since  much  of  our  critical  ore  and  metal  is  produced 
by  a  union  that  was  expelled  from  the  C.  I.  0.  for  alleged  Communist 
infiltration  and  control,  the  United  Mine,  Mill  and  Smelter  Workers  of 
America,  and  since  the  International  Federation  of  Architects,  Engi- 
neers, Chemists  and  Technicians  had  sent  their  members  into  the  fac- 
tories, laboratories  and  technical  research  projects  from  one  end  of  the 
Country  to  the  other,  the  Doris  Brin  Walker  case  is  simply  a  repetition 
bringing  the  well  known  Communist  technique  of  penetrating  sensitive 
areas  down  to  date  and  nailing  it  home  through  a  sweeping  decision  of 
our  State  Supreme  Court. 

In  another  section  of  this  report  the  committee  sets  forth  its  experi- 
ences in  hearings  in  connection  with  an  investigation  of  the  infiltration 
by  Communists  into  our  public  utilities.  From  the  Cutter  Laboratory 
case  we  can  learn  a  most  important  lesson.  We  can  learn  that  members 
of  the  Communist  Party  are  not  directed  to  carry  on  their  conspira- 
torial work  and  to  send  their  members  into  our  most  sensitive  institu- 
tions from  a  love  of  power  or  in  hope  of  monetary  profit.  On  the  con- 
trary, these  people  are  prompted  by  far  more  dangerous  motives.  If 
they  were  motivated  by  elements  of  greed  for  power  or  money,  it  would 
be  a  relatively  simple  matter  to  handle  the  problem.  One  man  who  had 
been  a  member  of  the  party  in  this  country  for  17  years  hammered 
home  the  point  that  all  Communists  he  had  ever  known  originally  en- 
tered the  party  in  the  mistaken  belief  that  through  it  they  had  found 
a  medium  for  the  solving  of  all  of  the  maladjustments  and  social  ill- 
nesses that  affected  civilization.  When  we  find  people  like  Julius  and 
Ethel  Rosenberg  who  go  to  their  death  in  the  electric  chair,  convicted 
traitors  to  their  country,  and  grimly  refuse  to  reveal  anything  about 
the  persons  with  whom  they  were  associated  in  their  traitorous  enter- 
prise, then  we  begin  to  realize  the  true  danger  with  which  we  are  con- 
fronted. This  is  nothing  new  in  history.  There  is  nothing  new  about 
fanatics  who  are  willing  to  make  any  sacrifice  for  the  principles  in 
which  they  believe  and  for  the  cause  to  which  they  are  dedicated. 
When  the  Christian  martyrs  were  clawed  to  death  by  wild  beasts  in 
the  Roman  arenas  and  sang  hymns  as  they  were  actually  dying,  we 
simply  saw  another  manifestation  of  this  characteristic. 


UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  69 

Doris  Walker  sacrificed  her  legal  training,  sacrificed  her  opportunity 
to  make  for  herself  a  reputation  as  a  capable  attorney,  and  preferred 
instead  to  live  a  life  of  secrecy  and  of  subterfuge  ;  to  attend  to  the  con- 
spiratorial business  of  undermining  our  country  and  to  achieve  that 
end  she  did  not  hesitate  to  lie,  misrepresent,  and  to  employ  every  ruse 
and  artifice  for  the  purpose  of  gaining  her  subversive  objective.  So  it 
is  with  the  other  members  of  the  Communist  Party,  fanaticized  and  ded- 
icated as  they  are,  and  who  will  never  hesitate  to  make  any  sacrifice 
demanded  of  them  for  the  purpose  of  worming  their  way  into  the  heart 
of  a  public  utility,  a  critical  labor  union,  a  university,  a  high  school, 
or  in  positions  of  influence  on  newspapers,  in  the  employ  of  our  tax 
exempt  foundations,  in  our  laboratories,  in  the  employ  of  our  state, 
county  or  municipal  governments,  or  in  any  other  position  which  the 
party  considers  of  strategic  use  in  its  relentless  campaign  to  destroy 
the  American  form  of  government  and  plant  a  ruthless  dictatorship  in 
its  place. 


COMMUNIST  INFILTRATION  OF  THE  MEDICAL 
PROFESSION 

On  Monday,  December  6,  1954,  the  committee  met  in  the  State  Build- 
ing at  Los  Angeles  to  conduct  a  public  hearing  concerning  Communist 
infiltration  of  the  Los  Angeles  County  Medical  Association.  For  almost 
a  week  the  committee  heard  the  testimony  of  more  than  30  witnesses 
and  received  in  evidence  hundreds  of  documentary  exhibits. 

Heretofore  the  committee  has  refrained  from  burdening  its  reports 
with  a  verbatim  repetition  of  the  entire  transcript  of  any  hearing.  In 
its  1951  report  the  committee  considered  the  evidence  received  in  the 
case  of  the  murder  of  Everitt  Hudson  to  be  of  such  importance  that 
very  little  of  the  testimony  was  omitted  from  the  report.  In  this  investi- 
gation and  hearing  concerning  Communist  infiltration  of  the  medical 
profession  in  the  southern  part  of  the  State,  the  committee  believes  that 
it  cannot  possibly  do  justice  to  the  subject  without  presenting  the  trans- 
cript of  the  hearing  almost  verbatim.  The  public  can  then  see  for  itself 
that  at  these  hearings  the  witnesses  are  not  insulted  or  browbeaten ;  that 
their  civil  liberties  are  not  invaded ;  that  they  are  treated  with  uniform 
courtesy  and  consideration  by  the  committee,  and  that  the  insults,  vitu- 
peration, abuses  and  smearing  usually  come  from  the  witnesses  rather 
than  from  the  committee — as  the  Communists,  their  propaganda  experts 
and  party  sympathizers,  together  with  a  growing  legion  of  self- 
appointed  guardians  of  our  civil  liberties  would  have  the  public  be- 
lieve. Furthermore,  the  committee  believes  that  those  who  read  this 
portion  of  its  report  cannot  help  but  draw  logical  inferences  from  the 
startling  contrast  between  the  group  of  witnesses  comprising  officers 
of  the  Los  Angeles  County  Medical  Association,  who  testified  frankly 
and  fully,  and  the  group  of  witnesses  which  followed  and  comprised 
those  concerning  whom  the  committee  had  already  amassed  considerable 
evidence  of  subversive  affiliation  or  activity.  It  will  also  be  manifest 
that  the  witnesses  who  identified  persons  known  to  them  as  Communist 
Party  members  had  never  seen  each  other  until  the  time  they  took  the 
witness  stand  to  give  their  testimony,  and  that  there  was  not  the  slight- 
est chance  of  collusion  or  pre-arrangement  between  them.  We  also  wish 
to  make  it  very  clear  that  the  testimony  of  those  witnesses  who  identi- 
fied Communist  Party  members  simply  corroborated  evidence  which  had 
been  in  the  possession  of  the  committee  for  a  period  of  several  years. 

As  will  be  seen,  the  committee  did  not  initiate  this  investigation  and 
hearing.  It  was  intiated  by  the  Los  Angeles  County  Medical  Associa- 
tion itself,  which  became  alarmed  at  evidences  that  it  was  being  infil- 

(70) 


UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  71 

trated  by  subversive  elements.  When  some  of  the  responsible  officers  of 
the  association  actually  attended  Communist  front  meetings  and  saw 
for  themselves  what  transpired,  they  determined  to  ask  the  California 
Senate  Committee  on  Un-American  Activities  to  undertake  an  investi- 
gation and  to  hold  a  hearing.  The  committee,  realizing  the  nature  of 
the  organization  concerned,  endeavored  at  all  times  to  conduct  the 
investigation  and  hearing  in  a  manner  commensurate  with  the  dignity 
and  status  of  the  medical  profession.  As  we  have  observed  in  other 
reports,  techniques  of  investigation  and  conduct  of  hearings  are  gov- 
erned largely  by  the  circumstances  involved.  We  prefer  to  hold  no 
public  hearings  concerning  infiltration  of  teachers  organizations  or  edu- 
cational institutions.  When  the  problem  becomes  so  critical  that  a  pub- 
lic hearing  is  the  only  means  of  getting  at  the  facts  and  endeavoring 
to  remedy  the  situation,  then  the  committee  has  no  alternative.  It 
realizes,  however,  that  the  educational  field  is  one  of  great  sensitivity, 
and  it  prefers  that  the  educational  administrators  on  all  levels  handle 
the  problem  themselves.  An  entirely  different  technique  is  indicated  in 
the  investigation  of  the  Communist  Party  itself,  its  front  organizations, 
its  propaganda  media,  and  its  underground  operations.  A  still  different 
approach  is  indicated  in  many  of  the  other  phases  of  the  ceaseless  job 
of  developing  the  true  facts  concerning  subversive  activities  in  this 
State. 

The  committee  was  especially  fortunate  in  this  instance  in  having 
the  services  of  Mrs.  Ruth  Drader,  who  had  been  acting  as  an  under- 
cover agent  for  the  committee  during  a  period  of  approximately  four 
years  preceding  the  date  of  the  hearing.  As  will  be  seen  from  her  testi- 
mony, Mrs.  Drader,  under  an  assumed  name,  managed  to  work  her  way 
into  positions  of  responsibility  in  several  Communist  front  organiza- 
tions. From  these  points  of  vantage  she  rendered  regular  written  reports 
to  the  committee  concerning  the  many  meetings  which  she  attended  and 
the  names  of  people  she  observed  actually  operating  these  Communist 
fronts  during  the  entire  period  of  her  employment. 

OFFICERS  OF  THE  LOS  ANGELES  COUNTY  MEDICAL  ASSOCIATION 

Following  is  an  account  of  the  testimony  from  officers  and  representa- 
tives of  the  Los  Angeles  County  Medical  Association  who  appeared  and 
testified  before  the  committee  on  December  6  and  7,  1954,  together 
with  testimony  received  from  the  deans  of  medical  schools  in  Los  An- 
geles universities,  and  the  testimony  of  Dr.  Nathaniel  Bercovitz,  a  medi- 
cal missionary  to  China,  whose  revelations  to  the  committee  concerning 
his  experience  with  Communists  proved  extremely  enlightening  and 
pertinent.  The  hearing  commenced  on  Monday,  December  6,  1954, 
with  a  statement  by  Senator  Burns,  the  committee  chairman. 


72  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

"Chairman  Burns:  The  committee  will  please  come  to  order.  As  a 
preface  to  this  hearing  today,  and  which  will  probably  be  continued 
during  the  week,  it  is  pursuant  to  a  request  made  upon  the  committee 
by  officials  of  the  Los  Angeles  County  Medical  Society  to  conduct  an 
inquiry  into  certain  activities  that  were  a  subject  of  suspicion  by  several 
leaders  of  the  medical  profession  in  this  county.  The  committee  has 
known,  of  course,  and  all  investigative  bodies  of  this  kind  have  known 
for  a  long  time,  that  the  professions  have  been  a  keen  objective  of  the 
Communist  Party. 

"Men  in  professional  life  hold  a  position  of  respect  and  influence 
in  the  communities  in  which  they  reside,  and  any  intellectual  group, 
as  well  as  other  organized  groups,  are  to  be  used  to  further  the  interests 
of  subversive  organizations  such  as  the  Communist  Party. 

"The  committee,  pursuant  to  this  request,  has  conducted,  over  a 
period  of  a  year  or  more,  an  inquiry  into  infiltration  by  the  party  into 
professional  endeavors  in  this  county.  This  hearing,  we  hope,  will  end 
this  inquiry  and  complete  the  efforts  of  our  committee  in  securing  all 
of  the  information  relating  to  the  activities  of  the  Communist  Party 
that  we  can  as  far  as  the  medical  profession  is  concerned. 

' '  Today  and  tomorrow  we  have,  in  the  main,  as  witnesses  prominent 
physicians  and  surgeons  of  Los  Angeles,  and,  following  their  testimony, 
we  are  asking  individuals  to  come  and  give  us  the  benefit  of  their  in- 
formation that  may  be  involved  in  furthering  the  work  of  the  Com- 
munist leadership  as  far  as  the  medical  profession  is  concerned.  We 
have  had  professional  investigators  working  and  towards  the  end  of 
the  week  we  will  hear  their  testimony. 

"I  think  that  I  should  impress  upon  you  and  for  the  benefit  of  the 
gentlemen  of  the  press  that  are  here  that,  merely  because  the  committee 
has  conducted  its  inquiry  and  is  in  the  process  of  conducting  it,  we  are 
at  the  present  time  accusing  no  individual  of  any  wrongdoing  and, 
because  of  the  fact  that  we  have  asked  individuals  to  appear  before  us 
is  no  indication  of  their  wrongdoing;  and  I  have  repeatedly  attempted 
to  impress  this  upon  the  public  mind  for  the  reason  that  there  has  been 
stigma  attached  to  individuals  appearing  before  this  committee  and 
giving  it  the  benefit  of  their  knowledge  and  their  ideas. 

' '  I  think  that  is  all  that  the  chairman  wishes  to  say  except  that  pres- 
ent here  today  is  a  working  majority  of  the  Senate  Committee  on  Un- 
American  Activities,  and  present  are  Senator  Jack  McCarthy  of  Marin 
County,  residence,  San  Rafael ;  Senator  Jack  Thompson  of  Santa  Clara 
County,  and  whose  residence  is  in  San  Jose;  the  executive  secretary 
of  the  committee,  Mrs.  Mary  E.  Hope ;  counsel  for  the  committee,  Mr. 
R.  E.  Combs,  and  Sergeant-at-Arms  of  the  Senate,  Mr.  Joseph  Nolan. 

"With  these  remarks,  I  will  declare  the  committee  ready  to  conduct. 
its  business  for  the  day. 


UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  73 

"Mr.  Combs:  Mr.  Chairman  and  Members  of  the  Committee,  I  wish 
to  point  out  that  all  of  the  witnesses  who  will  testify  throughout  this 
session  will  do  so  under  subpena.  There  will  be  no  volunteer  witnesses. 
And,  by  way  of  prefacing  the  more  detailed  portions  of  the  evidence, 
I  wish  to  read  into  the  record  now  a  statement  issued  by  William  Z. 
Foster  as  head  of  the  Communist  Party  of  the  United  States,  which 
appeared  in  the  official  publication  of  the  National  Committee  of  the 
Communist  Party  of  the  United  States,  a  publication  called  The  Com- 
munist, published  in  September,  1938,  in  which  he  removes  any  possible 
lingering  doubt  about  the  purposes  of  the  Communist  Party  of  this 
Country  to  infiltrate  and  insinuate  its  members  into  strategic  profes- 
sions, in  not  only  the  professions  but  in  particular  the  medical  profes- 
sion. And  I  think  it  is  appropriate  to  read  this  basic  declaration  by 
the  head  of  the  Communist  Party  of  the  United  States  into  the  record 
before  calling  the  first  witness.  The  material  which,  as  I  said,  was  taken 
from  the  September,  1938,  issue  of  the  magazine,  The  Communist,  at 
page  805  and  following  pages,  reads  as  follows : 

"  'In  late  years,  and  particularly  during  our  recent  big  recruiting 
campaign,  an  appreciable  number  of  professionals,  doctors,  dentists, 
lawyers,  engineers,  teachers,  actors,  etc.,  have  joined  our  party,  notably 
in  the  New  York  area. 

"  'In  drawing  professionals  into  the  party,  care  should  be  exercised 
to  select  only  those  individuals  who  show  by  practical  work  that  they 
definitely  understand  the  party  line,  are  prepared  to  put  it  into  effect, 
and  especially  display  a  thorough  readiness  to  accept  party  discipline. 
It  is  not  enough  that  professionals  should  support  our  general  struggle 
for  democracy  and  peace ;  they  must  also  accept  the  socialist  principles 
of  our  party.  There  must  be  selective  recruiting  far  more  than  in  the 
case  of  miners,  longshoremen,  railroad  workers,  etc.  General  party  units 
which  proceed  upon  the  basis  of  mass  recruitment  of  lawyers,  or  of 
drawing  doctors  into  the  party  on  a  large  scale,  have  a  wrong  policy.' 

"Here,  again,  is  the  familiar  Communist  emphasis  on  quality  rather 
than  quantity  of  professional  members.  Foster  continued : 

"  'There  must  be  special  attention  paid  to  the  Marxian  education  of 
professionals  entering  our  party.  This  should  have  the  definite  goal  of 
thoroughly  communizing  their  outlook  and  reorienting  their  previous 
intellectual  training  so  that  its  full  value  may  be  utilized  in  a  revolu- 
tionary sense  by  our  party  and  the  masses. 

"  'Communist  professionals  also  have  the  very  important  task  of 
advancing  and  even  revolutionizing  the  techniques  and  theories  of  their 
respective  professions.  They  must  take  up  the  intellectual  cudgels 
against  the  reactionaries  on  all  fronts.  Thus,  our  teachers  must  write 
new  textbooks  and  rewrite  history  from  the  Marxian  viewpoint;  our 
scientists  must  organize  more  effectively  the  battle  of  the  materialists 


74  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN  CALIFORNIA 

against  the  idealists  in  every  branch,  of  science ;  our  doctors  must  intro- 
duce new  methods  into  medicine ;  the  American  Medical  Association  is 
not  only  reactionary  politically  but  also  medically;  our  lawyers  must 
challenge  prevalent  musty  capitalist  legal  conceptions  and  rewrite  our 
legal  history;  our  writers  must  bring  forward  class-struggle  themes  in 
literature  and  the  theater,  etc.  In  short,  our  Communist  professionals 
must  develop  a  powerful  Marxist-Leninist  ideological  front  against  the 
reactionaries  and  their  Trotzkyite-Lovestoneite  stooges  in  every  field  of 
artistic  and  intellectual  endeavor.' 

"There  was  some  criticism  of  the  statement  made  by  Mr.  Foster  to 
the  effect  that  the  American  Medical  Association  was  reactionary  both 
politically  and  professionally  and,  after  he  had  been  criticized  and 
questioned  concerning  that  conclusion,  he  inserted  another  article  in 
The  Communist  magazine  for  December,  1938,  at  page  1137,  in  which 
he  said : 

"  'As  Communists,  we  cannot  allow  ourselves  to  be  tied  in  such  a 
narrow  and  reactionary  conception  of  medicine  as  that  of  the  A.  M.  A. 
We  are  interested  not  only  in  developing  health  work  in  the  sense  of 
improving  and  extending  the  art  of  healing,  but,  above  all,  in  the 
prevention  of  sickness  by  literally  building  up  the  people's  health.  A 
people's  health  program  is  quite  a  different  thing  from  the  medical 
guide-like  policy  of  the  A.  M.  A.  Hence,  we  must  be  the  champions, 
especially  our  physician  comrades,  in  fighting  for  all  the  political, 
economic,  educational  and  technical  measures  necessary  to  advance  a 
true  people's  health  program.  And,  in  the  measure  that  we  do  this,  we 
are  bound  to  find  ourselves  more  or  less  in  opposition  to  the  A.  M.  A. 
policy  on  various  fronts,  not  only  political  and  social  but  also  medical. 

"  '"We  do  not  have  to  wait  until  after  the  revolution  to  begin  sup- 
porting these  broader  principles  of  a  people's  health  program.  Their 
realization  here  and  now,  so  far  as  possible,  is  a  major  task  of  the 
democratic  front,  and  we  should  try  to  educate  the  movement  to  that 
effect.  When  we  grasp  more  clearly  the  nature  of  such  a  broad  people 's 
health  program  and  begin  to  work  seriously  for  its  realization,  then,  as 
we  encounter  the  A.  M.  A.  's  hostile  attitude,  we  will  have  no  difficulty 
in  understanding  that  the  A.  M.  A.,  under  its  present  leadership  and 
policies,  is  reactionary  not  only  politically,  but  also  medically. ' 

"That  appeared  in  the  official  publication  of  the  Communist  Party 
of  the  United  States  in  December,  1938. 

"Now,  Mr.  Chairman  and  Members  of  the  Committee,  we  have  asked 
members  of  the  medical  association  to  appear  here  this  morning  and 
testify  and  to  identify  certain  documents.  And  I  also  wish  to  state  that, 
in  conjunction  with  the  initial  phases  of  the  investigation  which  the 
committee  conducted  pursuant  to  the  request  the  association  made,  we 


UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  75 

asked  several  members  of  the  profession  to  attend  what  we  considered 
to  be  Communist-dominated  meetings,  which  they  have  done,  and  today 
and  tomorrow  we  will  receive  some  of  the  testimony  along  those  lines. 
"The  present  president  of  the  Los  Angeles  County  Medical  Associa- 
tion, Dr.  J.  Phillip  Sampson,  one  of  the  gentlemen  who  signed  the  letter 
requesting  this  hearing,  is  present  and  I  would  like  to  ask  him  to  come 
forward  at  this  time. 

TESTIMONY  OF  J.  PHILLIP  SAMPSON,  M.D. 

"Chairman  Burns:  Will  you  state  your  full  name  and  address, 
please  ? 

1 '  The  Witness :  My  name  is  John  Phillip  Sampson ;  I  am  a  physician 
and  surgeon,  M.D. ;  my  office  address  is  2200  Santa  Monica  Boulevard; 
my  home  address  is  1961  Mandeville  Canyon,  West  Los  Angeles. 

"Question  (By  Mr.  Combs)  :  Doctor  Sampson,  I  hand  you  what 
purports  to  be  a  copy  of  a  resolution  adopted  by  the  Los  Angeles 
County  Medical  Association  and  which  bears  the  date  June  1,  1953, 
and  ask  you  if  you  will  kindly  identify  this  for  me  if  you  can. 

"Answer:  Yes.  This  is  a  resolution  that  was  passed  by  the  Los  An- 
geles County  Medical  Association. 

"  Q.  On  the  date  that  it  bears  1 

"A.  On  the  date  that  it  bears. 

"Q.  Would  you  mind  reading  it  into  the  record,  please? 

"A.  Yes,  sir. 

"  'Resolution.  Whereas,  The  principles  of  medical  ethics  of  the 
American  Medical  Association  contain  the  following  guiding  principles 
for  its  members,  which  become  a  vital  prerequisite  to  original  member- 
ship and  continued  membership  in  the  American  Medical  Association 
and  the  Los  Angeles  County  Medical  Association: 

"  '1.  *  *  *  Conducting  himself  with  propriety  in  his  profession  and 
in  all  the  actions  of  his  life. 

"  '2.  Every  physician  should  aid  in  safeguarding  the  profession 
against  admission  to  it  of  those  who  are  deficient  in  moral  charac- 
ter *  *  * 

"  '3.  A  physician  should  expose  without  fear  or  favor  incompetent 
or  corrupt,  dishonest  or  unethical  conduct  on  the  part  of  members  of 
the  profession. 

"  '4.  They  should  bear  their  part  in  enforcing  the  laws  of  the  com- 
munity and  in  sustaining  the  institutions  that  advance  the  interests 
of  humanity ;  and 

"  'Whereas,  Membership  in  the  Communist  Party  precludes  a  free 
exercise  of  these  principles  and  in  fact  is  diametrically  opposed  to  any 
of  them ;  therefore  be  it 


76  UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

"  l  Resolved,  That  it  is  the  expressed  view  of  the  Council  of  the  Los 
Angeles  County  Medical  Association  that  any  member  of  the  Communist 
Party  cannot  act  in  a  manner  to  accord  with  the  letter  or  the  spirit  of 
the  principles  of  medical  ethics  of  the  American  Medical  Association 
and  that  membership  in  the  Communist  Party  is  incompatible  with 
membership  in  the  Los  Angeles  County  Medical  Association;  and  be 
it  further 

"  'Resolved,  That  this  resolution  shall  not  be  applicable  to  any  indi- 
vidual who  has  unequivocally  demonstrated  a  total  severance  with  the 
Communist  Party  and  its  objectives.' 

"It  is  dated  June  1,  1953.  That  was  adopted  by  unanimous  vote  and 
is  in  effect  at  the  present  time. 

"Mr.  Combs:  I  would  like  to  introduce  this  document  as  Exhibit 
No.  1. 

"Chairman  Burns:  It  will  be  admitted  as  Committee  Exhibit  No.  1. 

"Q.  (By  Mr.  Combs)  :  Dr.  Sampson,  you  are  the  duly  elected, 
qualified  and  acting  president  of  the  Los  Angeles  County  Medical 
Association,  are  you  not  ? 

"A.  I  am. 

"Q.  And  you  will  continue  to  hold  that  office  until  the  latter  part 
of  this  month? 

"A.  Until  January  1st. 

"Q.  And  then  you  will  be  succeeded  by  whom? 

"A.  Dr.  Ewing  Turner. 

"Q.  Who  is  present? 

"A.  He  is  present. 

"Q.  Dr.  Sampson,  as  president,  you  are  familiar  with  the  requests 
to  this  committee  to  conduct  an  investigation? 

"A.  I  am  familiar  with  the  requests  made. 

"Q.  I  hand  you  two  letters,  one  dated  December  12,  1953,  and  the 
other  dated  January  13,  1954,  and  ask  you  if  you  will  identify  those 
for  me,  please  ? 

"A.  The  first  one,  that  was  written  on  December  12,  1953,  was  writ- 
ten to  R.  E.  Combs,  Chief  Counsel,  California  Senate  Committee  on 
Un-American  Activities,  415  West  Race  Street,  Visalia,  California,  and 
it  was  signed  by  Paul  D.  Foster,  M.D.,  President,  Verne  C.  Crowl, 
M.D.,  Vice  President,  and  Ewing  L.  Turner,  M.D.,  Secretary-Treas- 
urer. Do  you  wish  me  to  read  the  letter  ? 

"  Q.  If  you  will,  please. 

"A.  'Dear  Mr.  Combs:  Recognizing  the  deep  responsibility  of  the 
medical  profession  in  fields  vitally  important  to  the  national  welfare, 
such  as  civilian  defense,  atomic  research,  and  other  equally  important 
phases  of  this  subject,  the  Los  Angeles  County  Medical  Association 
respectfully  requests  the  assistance  of  the  California  Senate  Committee 


UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  77 

on  Uii-American  Activities.  This  association  would  appreciate  an  in- 
vestigation by  your  committee  to  determine  the  extent  of  infiltration 
into  the  ranks  of  the  profession  by  persons  whose  loyalty  toward  the 
United  States  is  questionable. 

"  'We  offer  our  full  cooperation  in  this  project,  and  you  may  be 
sure  that  we  will  assist  you  in  every  possible  way  should  this  request 
be  granted. 

"  'Signed  for  the  Los  Angeles  County  Medical  Association  by  the 
Executive  Committee. '  And  it  is  signed  by  the  executives  whose  names 
I  have  read. 

"Q.  The  second  letter,  which  is  a  repetition  of  the  first,  was  dated 
in  1954  because  new  officers  had  taken  office? 

"A.  That  is  right. 

"Q.  And  that  was  addressed  to  whom? 

"A.  That  was  addressed  to  Senator  Hugh  M.  Burns,  California  State 
Senate,  Equitable  Building,  Fresno,  California. 

"Q.  And  is  a  repetition  of  the  other  letter? 

"A.  And  is  a  repetition  of  the  previous  letter.  It  was  sent  by  Mr. 
K.  C.  Young,  who  is  the  secretary  of  our  organization,  at  my  request 
and  at  the  request  of  Dr.  Turner  and  of  Dr.  Clair  Cosgrove,  who  has 
since  passed  away  and  who  was  vice  president  at  that  time. 

"Mr.  Combs:  I  ask  that  these  letters  be  introduced  into  evidence  as 
Exhibits  2  and  3. 

' '  Chairman  Burns :  They  will  be  admitted. 

"Q.  (By  Mr.  Combs)  :  Dr.  Sampson,  the  Office  of  the  Los  Angeles 
County  Medical  Association  is  located  at  1925  Wilshire  Boulevard,  is 
that  correct? 

"A.  At  1925. 

"Q.  Going  back  to  the  inception  of  the  concern,  which  was  expressed 
by  you  and  other  members  of  the  medical  profession  concerning  the 
infiltration  of  that  profession  by  suspected  members  of  the  Communist 
Party,  would  you  mind  giving  us  in  your  own  way,  and  as  a  broad 
background,  the  nature  of  the  inception  of  your  concern  ?  That  is,  what 
I  mean  by  that  is  whether  or  not  you  discussed  with  other  members  of 
your  profession  the  things  which  gave  impetus  to  your  concern  and 
which  ultimately  led  up  to  the  writing  of  the  letters  last  referred  to? 

"A.  The  medical  profession  has  been  increasingly  aware  of  the  fact 
that  there  are  Communists  in  the  United  States  both  from  the  press 
and  from  the  various  reports  of  the  various  committees  that  have  been 
meeting  all  over,  Senate  committees  and  the  House  of  Representatives 
committees  that  have  been  holding  investigations.  And  it  has  been 
stated  at  one  time  and  another  among  groups  of  us  that  the  Communist 
Party  was  becoming  particularly  active  in  southern  California,  and 
that,  while  all  professions  were  targets  for  their  endeavors,  the  medical 


78  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

profession  was  the  leading  one.  It  was  our  wish  to  clean  our  skirts  com- 
pletely and  to  be  sure  that  there  were  no  Communists  in  our  group 
and,  if  there  were  Communists  in  our  group,  to  expose  them  so  that  all 
might  know  who  they  were.  We  wanted  to  be  as  good  Americans  as  we 
could  and  for  this  reason  we  requested  Senator  Burns  to  conduct  this 
research  into  our  organization. 

"Q.  Is  it  your  conviction  that  the  Communist  Party  has  used  the 
technique  in  placing  its  members  in  the  medical  profession  by  employ- 
ing so-called  front  organizations  that  are  Communist-dominated  actu- 
ally but  pose  as  progressive  or  liberal  or  non-Communist  organizations  ? 

"A.  That  has  come  to  my  attention.  It  goes  a  little  deeper  than  that. 
They  organize  in  a  little  community  of  small  area,  get  a  few  doctors 
together,  and  then  say,  'we've  got  to  do  something  to  help  these  poor 
people  here. '  It  is  put  entirely  on  that  kind  of  a  basis.  And  then,  finally, 
after  they  select  the  men  that  they  wish  to  work  on,  then  it  goes  more 
deeply  than  that. 

"Q.  Are  you  familiar  in  a  general  way  with  a  slate  of  members  of 
your  profession  that  endeavor  to  gain  political  control  of  the  organ- 
ization ? 

"A.  Yes,  I  am. 

' '  Q.  Do  you  remember  that  board  ? 

"A.  I  do  remember  that  board. 

"Q.  It  was  two  years  ago,  wasn't  it? 

"A.  It  was  three  years  ago. 

"Q.  And  are  you  acquainted  in  general  terms  with  the  situation  at 
Cedars  of  Lebanon  Hospital  which  resulted  in  the  discharge  of  three 
members  of  the  medical  profession  in  Los  Angeles  County  who  had 
refused  to  answer  questions  put  to  them  by  the  House  Committee  on 
Un-American  Activities  ? 

"A.  I  remember  that;  yes. 

' '  Q.  Are  you  familiar  in  a  general  way,  Dr.  Sampson,  with  the  propa- 
ganda and  pressure  that  was  whipped  up  in  behalf  of  those  three 
gentlemen  ? 

"A.  I  am. 

"Q.  "Were  they  or  any  of  them  members  of  the  Los  Angeles  County 
Medical  Association? 

"A.  Yes,  they  were  members  of  our  organization. 

"Q.  And  did  that  also  give  you  concern  as  to  others  who  might  be 
in  a  similar  situation? 

"A.  It  gave  us  grave  concern ;  that  is  correct. 

"Q.  You  are  familiar  with  the  hearing  conducted  by  the  House  Com- 
mittee on  Un-American  Activities  in  October,  1952,  generally? 

"A.  Yes. 


UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  79 

"Q.  And  have  you  paid  any  attention  to  the  number  of  witnesses 
who  were  doctors  in  Los  Angeles  County  who,  when  asked  whether  or 
not  they  were  members  of  the  Communist  Party  invoked  the  Fifth 
Amendment  ? 

A.  I  remember  there  were  a  number  of  them. 

Actually,  there  were  16.  If  I  read  their  names  to  you,  do  you 
think  you  could  identify  them  ? 

A.  I  think  I  could  identify  the  majority  of  them. 

Q.  Alexander  Pennes? 

A.  Yes. 

Q.  Joseph  Hittelman? 

A.  Yes. 

Q.  Simson  Marcus  ? 

A.  Yes. 

Q.  Morris  R.  Feder  ? 

A.  Yes. 

Q.  Harold  Koppelman  1 

A.  Yes. 

Q.  Jack  Nedelman? 

A.  That  is  correct.  I  know  him. 

Q.  Milton  Lester  ? 

;A.  Yes. 

Samuel  J.  Sperling? 

Yes. 

Walter  Kempler  ? 

:A.  Yes. 

Q.  Jacob  S.  Bruckman? 

A.  I  don 't  know  him. 

:  Q.  Thomas  L.  Perry,  Jr.  ? 

A.  Yes. 

Q.  Gordon  Rosenbloom? 

A.  Yes. 

Q.  Benjamin  M.  Lieberman? 

A.  Yes. 

:  Q.  Frederick  G.  Reynolds  ? 

;A.  Yes. 

;  Q.  Bertram  L.  Roberts  ? 

A.  Yes. 

Q.  Oscar  Elkins? 

A.  No ;  I  don 't  know  him. 

Q.  Oner  B.  Barker,  Jr.  ? 

A.  Yes. 


80  UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

"  Q.  Do  you  know  whether  Dr.  Thomas  L.  Perry  had  anything  to  do 
with  an  organization  commonly  known  as  AIMS,  which  is  the  associa- 
tion of  internes  and  medical  students  ? 

"A.  There  was  some  discussion  of  that  which  is  back  in  my  memory. 

"Q.  You  made  no  effort  to  make  any  detailed  investigation  of  it? 

"A.  No. 

"Q.  Did  you  hear  me  read  the  statement  made  by  William  Z.  Foster, 
head  of  the  Communist  Party  of  the  United  States,  in  connection  with 
the  importance  to  the  party  of  placing  members  in  the  medical  pro- 
fession ? 

' '  A.  I  heard  you  make  that  statement. 

1 '  Q.  Would  it,  in  your  opinion,  add  to  the  ability  of  the  Communist 
Party  to  attract  additional  material  for  eventual  recruiting  into  the 
party  by  placing  on  the  directorate  of  an  apparently  non- Communist 
organization  men  who  have  the  prestige  and  the  standing  in  their  com- 
munity of  members  of  the  medical  profession  ? 

' '  A.  Oh,  definitely ;  there  is  no  question  about  that ;  and  their  propa- 
ganda for  the  party  is  quite  obvious ;  also,  the  intimate  relationship  of 
the  doctor  with  the  family  and  with  people  in  general. 

' '  Q.  For  example,  if  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party  were  straying 
from  the  paths  of  Americanism  and  rectitude,  his  evaluation  by  a  fel- 
low scientist  would  be  of  value  to  the  party  ? 

' '  A.  That  is  correct. 

"  Q.  Are  you  aware  of  the  fact  that  the  relationship  of  attorney  and 
client,  which,  of  course,  is  protected  by  law,  of  priest  and  penitent  and 
of  physician  and  patient,  affords  a  rather  unique  medium  for  the  pres- 
ervation of  secrecy  in  the  conduct  of  Communist  Party  propaganda? 

"A.  Yes;  very  much  so.  Is  that  called  a  privileged  communication? 

"Q.  That  is  a  privilege  that  exists  between  those  three  groups. 

' '  A.  I  might  state  I  think  the  most  important  thing  that  you  said  in 
this  Foster  excerpt  that  you  read  was  that  we  do  not  need  to  wait  for 
the  revolution  to  have  doctors  change  their  attitude.  I  wish  to  empha- 
size that. 

"Q.  And  you  also  remember  that  he  said  that  great  mass  infiltration 
was  not  the  thing,  expressing  the  desire  for  quality  rather  than 
quantity  ? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  And  the  committee  has  pointed  out  that  it  has  found  no  mass 
infiltration  on  the  university  level  or  in  the  educational  field  but,  obvi- 
ously, a  workman  who  erects  a  building  designed  to  smash  the  atom, 
if  he  may  be  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party,  is  relatively  unimpor- 
tant, but  the  man  who  operates  the  mechanism  itself  that  produces  the 
atom  is  of  enormous  importance. 


UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  81 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  Now,  Dr.  Sampson,  did  you,  yourself,  ever  attend  any  meetings 
of  so-called  front  organizations  ? 

''A.  Not  to  my  knowledge. 

"  Q.  You  know  that  other  members  of  your  profession  have  ? 

' '  A.  They  have  told  me  they  have. 

"Q.  And  have  you  discussed  with  them  their  views  and  the  things 
they  observed  at  these  meetings  ? 

"A.  Yes,  I  have. 

' '  Q.  And  that  was  done  during  your  tenure  as  president  ? 

"A.  It  was  during  my  tenure  as  president,  yes,  sir. 

' '  Q.  Mr.  Combs :  I  think  that  is  all. 

"Q.  (By  Senator  McCarthy)  :  Doctor,  can  you  tell  me  the  names  of 
some  of  these  organizations  that  some  of  your  associates  have  attended  ? 

"A.  I  don 't  remember  the  names  of  them  but  they  told  me  that  they 
had  been  to  meetings  and  that  they  were  names  that  were  listed,  and 
that  is  as  far  as  I  can  tell  you.  I  wish  to  make  one  statement  if  I  may, 
that  the  Los  Angeles  County  Medical  Association  and  I  as  president 
wish  to  do  everything  in  our  power  to  help  you  in  this  investigation. 

"Mr.  Combs:  And  I  wish  to  point  out  that  you  certainly  have.  May 
Dr.  Sampson  be  excused? 

"Chairman  Burns:  Yes. 

' '  Mr.  Combs :  Dr.  Ewing  Turner,  please. 

TESTIMONY  OF  DR.  EWING  TURNER,  M.D. 

' '  Chairman  Burns :  "Will  you  give  your  name  and  address  ? 

"The  Witness:  My  name  is  Ewing  L.  Turner,  M.D.,  business  address, 
1930  Wilshire  Boulevard.  Home  address,  5700  Hill  Oak  Drive. 

"Q.  (By  Mr.  Combs)  :  Dr.  Turner,  you  are  the  president-elect  of  the 
Los  Angeles  County  Medical  Association,  are  you  not? 

' '  A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  And  you  will  assume  office  on  the  first  of  January,  1955? 

"A.  Correct. 

"Q.  And  prior  to  your  election  as  president  you  served  two  consecu- 
tive terms  as  secretary-treasurer  ? 

"A.  That  is  right,  secretary-treasurer. 

"Q.  Did  the  association  ever  publish  a  bulletin  of  any  kind? 

"A.  Yes,  we  have  a  bulletin  that  is  published  every  two  weeks. 

"Q.  And  that  goes  to  all  members  of  the  association,  does  it? 

"A.  Right. 

"Q.  Did  you  ever  have  any  official  connection  with  that  publication? 

"A.  Yes,  I  have  been  editor  for  the  past  two  years. 


82  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

"Q.  You  were  present  and  heard  the  testimony  of  the  witness  who 
preceded  you,  Dr.  Sampson? 

"A.  Yes,  sir. 

"Q.  If  I  were  to  ask  you  the  same  questions  concerning  the  general 
background  of  the  matters  that  led  to  the  writing  of  the  letters  request- 
ing this  investigation  and  hearing,  would  your  answers  be  substantially 
the  same? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  Did  you,  yourself,  Dr.  Turner,  ever  attend  any  meetings  of  any 
so-called  Communist  front  organizations? 

"A.  No;  I  have  not. 

"Q.  Are  you  familiar  with  the  incident  at  the  Cedars  of  Lebanon 
Hospital  which  resulted  in  the  discharge  of  the  three  doctors? 

"A.  Yes,  I  recall  that. 

"Q.  And  you  are  familiar  with  the  hearings  held  here  by  the  House 
Committee  involving  16  doctors  whose  names  I  read  into  the  record? 

"A.  Yes,  sir. 

"Q.  Dr.  Turner,  would  you  mind  giving  the  committee  the  benefit 
of  your  own  views  concerning  the  problem  and  the  reasons  for  your 
concern  and  your  attitude  as  president-elect  of  the  association  about 
the  situation? 

"A.  I  would  like  to  say,  first,  that  I  am  quite  sure  that  the  majority 
of  our  membership  of  6,200  doctors  are  very  patriotic  good  American 
citizens  and  I  am  also  quite  sure  that  there  is  no  mass  infiltration  of 
our  profession  nor  will  there  be  if  we  have  anything  to  do  about  it; 
and  I  am  also  just  as  sure  that  there  are  probably  a  few,  perhaps  a 
handful,  perhaps  a  dozen,  who  come  within  the  category  heretofore 
mentioned.  We  have  no  idea  of  the  exact  number.  But  the  thing  that 
concerns  me  is  not  with  the  number  that  we  have  but  with  the  fact  that 
these  men  are  doctors  of  medicine  and  that  they  do  have  a  tremendous 
influence  not  only  among  their  own  confreres  but  with  the  public 
because  of  the  intimate  contact  all  physicians  have  with  patients.  Those 
are  the  things  that  are  bothering  me.  In  addition,  I  might  say  that, 
having  been  secretary  for  two  years,  I  think  all  of  you  gentlemen  on 
the  committee  know  the  secretary  of  any  organization  is  the  man  who 
hears  all  the  laudatory  comments  about  the  organization  and  he  is  also 
the  fellow  who  gets  all  the  complaints.  If  there  is  any  criticism  about 
anything  it  is  the  secretary  of  an  organization  who  usually  hears  about 
it.  And  during  my  tenure  of  office  for  two  terms  as  secretary  I  have 
had  numerous  telephone  calls  about  this  particular  problem  from 
people  who  were  worried  about  this  doctor  or  that  doctor  or  this  group 
or  that  group.  Those  are  the  things  that  first  brought  this  to  my  mind 
some  two  years  ago.  In  addition,  we  had  a  little  difficulty  in  the  organi- 
zation one  time  when  we  passed  this  resolution  that  was  read  a  little 


UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN  CALIFORNIA  83 

earlier,  stating  that  it  was  unethical  for  a  physician  to  be  associated 
with  one  of  these  subversive  groups.  There  was  lots  of  criticism  that 
came  to  me  as  secretary  from  various  people  in  the  association  about 
that.  At  another  time  we  attempted  to  change  our  by-laws.  That  was 
about  a  year  ago.  In  our  by-law  change  we  incorporated  the  prerequi- 
site for  membership  of  the  signing  of  a  loyalty  oath,  which  many  organi- 
zations have  throughout  the  county  and  which  none  of  us  take  excep- 
tion to  and  which  none  of  us  have  any  compunction  about  signing,  but 
there  were  letters  published  by  a  certain  group  objecting  rather  stren- 
uously to  a  number  of  the  changes  in  the  by-laws.  And  among  those 
changes  the  one  thing  that  seemed  to  get  the  biggest  comment  was  the 
signing  of  the  loyalty  oath  as  a  prerequisite  for  membership  in  the  Los 
Angeles  County  Medical  Association.  That  rather  startled  some  of  us 
in  the  official  family  of  the  association  because  I  can  assure  you  gentle- 
men that  in  our  board  of  trustees,  consisting  of  seven  very  able,  very 
patriotic  gentlemen,  and  our  council,  consisting  of  41  good  and  true 
doctors,  there  is  not  one  single  man  that  has  any  of  these  feelings  of 
subversion  or  questionable  loyalty.  It  is  because  of  this  background 
that  the  thing  seemed  to  me  to  be  important  and  that  is  the  reason  that 
I  was  happy  to  be  a  signator. 

"Q.  May  I  interrupt  you?  (At  this  point  Dr.  J.  Philip  Sampson, 
the  previous  witness,  rose  from  the  audience  and  was  about  to  leave 
the  room.)  Dr.  Sampson,  are  you  now  or  have  you  ever  been  a  member 
of  the  Communist  Party? 

"A.  Dr.  Sampson:  Hell,  no. 

"Q.  Do  you  have  any  feeling  of  resentment  by  being  asked  to  declare 
yourself  in  that  respect  ? 

"A.  Dr.  Sampson:  No,  sir.  The  only  resentment  I  have  is  that  it  is 
necessary  for  you  to  ask  that  question. 

"Q.  Will  you  continue,  Dr.  Turner. 

"A.  (By  Dr.  Turner)  :  I  was  just  saying  I  was  very  happy  to  be  a 
signator  to  the  request  to  you,  Senator  Burns,  for  the  committee  to 
come  and  help  us  find  this  handful  of  men  who  are  of  questionable 
loyalty,  and  we  are  very  happy,  as  Dr.  Sampson  has  just  said,  to  give 
you  every  cooperation  in  this  effort. 

"Q.  Which  you  certainly  have,  as  I  said  before.  I  think  that  is  all. 
Well,  one  other  question.  Are  you  familiar  in  a  general  way  with  the 
Association  of  Internes  and  Medical  Students? 

"A.  I  don't  know  very  much  about  it  other  than  just  a  few  things 
that  I  heard. 

"Q.  I  show  you  a  booklet  entitled  For  Immediate  Release.  Leftist 
Minority  Woos  Future  Doctors.  A  Behind-the-Scenes  Look  at  the  As- 
sociation of  Internes  and  Medical  Students,  and  ask  you  if  you  have 


84  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN  CALIFORNIA 

seen  that  before  or  are  familiar  with  its  contents  or  have  read  it  or  any 
part  of  it. 

"A.  I  read  this  when  it  was  printed. 

' '  Q.  Did  it  have  a  rather  wide  circulation  among  the  members  of  the 
medical  profession  in  this  part  of  the  country? 

"A.  Very  wide. 

"Q.  It  is  in  the  nature  of  an  expose  of  the  Communist  control  of 
this  particular  organization,  isn't  it? 

"A.  Correct. 

' '  Q.  In  your  view  was  that  a  salutary  thing  to  do  so  that  the  organ- 
ization could  be  shown  for  what  it  was? 

"A.  Yes,  certainly. 

"Q.  I  believe  that  is  all  except  for  the  other  question.  Are  you  now 
or  have  you  ever  been  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party  or  of  the 
Communist  Political  Association? 

"A.  I  am  not,  have  never  been  and  will  not  be. 

"Q.  (By  Senator  Thompson)  :  Doctor,  was  there  any  open  opposi- 
tion to  the  resolution  which  was  heretofore  mentioned? 

"A.  Open  opposition  in  that  letters  were  circulated  and  a  lot  of 
talking  was  done  by  members  who  didn't  want  the  resolution  adopted. 

"Q.  That  is,  particularly  on  the  loyalty  oath? 

"A.  Yes,  sir. 

"Q.  Did  you  keep  any  written  record  of  those  who  were  in  opposi- 
tion to  that? 

"A.  One  letter  that  was  sent  out  in  October  of  last  year  had  some 
50  signatures  on  it.  These  signators  were  not  complaining  about  any 
one  item  in  the  by-law  changes  but  they  were  complaining  about  a 
number  of  things  which  they  thought  were  not  quite  the  way  they 
should  be.  But,  as  I  also  mentioned,  one  of  the  longest  paragraphs  in 
their  opposition  to  the  by-law  changes  concerned  this  particular  phase 
of  it. 

"Q.  Do  you  believe  that  was  brought  about  by  certain  individuals 
in  a  small  group  within  your  organization? 

"A.  I  would  certainly  feel  so,  although  I  would  hasten  to  add  that 
I  don't  know  and  I  certainly  would  be  the  last  man  to  suggest  that  the 
50  signators  were  all  members  of  a  subversive  group. 

"Q.  Do  you  believe  that  all  organizations,  such  as  this,  whether  it 
be  a  professional  organization  or  not,  should  take  a  loyalty  oath  ? 

"A.  Yes,  I  do. 

"Q.  Do  you  believe  members  of  county  committees  should  take  a 
loyalty  oath? 

"A.  I  certainly  do. 

"Senator  Thompson:  Thank  you. 


UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES  IN  CALIFORNIA  85 

"Mr.  Combs:  That  is  all.  Thank  you  very  much,  Dr.  Turner. 
"Dr.  Alesen,  please. 

TESTIMONY  OF  DR.  LEWIS  ALBERT  ALESEN,  M.D. 

' '  Chairman  Burns :  Will  you  state  your  full  name  and  address  ? 

"The  Witness:  Lewis  A.  Alesen.  I  practice  at  1401  South  Hope 
Street  and  I  live  at  124  South  Las  Palmas  Avenue,  Los  Angeles. 

"Q.  (By  Mr.  Combs)  :  Dr.  Alesen,  have  you  ever  held  any  official 
position  in  the  California  State  Medical  Association  or  Society? 

"A.  Yes,  sir,  I  was  its  president  in  the  year  1952-1953. 

"Q.  That  comprised  the  entire  State  of  California? 

"A.  Yes,  sir. 

"Q.  Did  you  ever  hold  any  official  position  in  the  Los  Angeles 
County  Medical  Association? 

"A.  I  have,  sir.  In  1933-1934  I  was  a  counsellor  representing  the 
Physicians  and  Surgeons  Club  and  I  was  a  counsellor  in  the  old  Dis- 
trict No.  1  from  1937  to  1941  and  in  1943  I  was  secretary-treasurer 
and  in  1944  I  was  president  of  the  Los  Angeles  County  Medical  As- 
sociation. 

"Q.  Have  you  ever  been  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party  or  the 
Communist  Political  Association? 

"A.  No,  sir. 

"Q.  And  are  not  affiliated  with  any  of  those  organizations? 

"A.  No,  sir. 

"Q.  Dr.  Alesen,  it  is  my  understanding  and  correct  me  if  I  am  in 
error,  that  you  have  devoted  a  considerable  part  of  your  time  to  re- 
search in  sociological  affairs  and  economics  in  general  and  that  you 
have  also  devoted  considerable  of  your  time  and  talent  to  making  pub- 
lic addresses  to  medical  bodies  and  other  groups,  is  that  correct? 

"A.  I  have.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  Have  you  ever  addressed  any  of  those  groups  on  the  general 
subject  of  Communism? 

"A.  I  have  in  a  very  general  way,  yes,  sir. 

"Q.  And  you  are,  of  course,  well  equipped  with  a  basic  understand- 
ing of  Americanism  doctrines  and  the  effort  of  the  Communist  organiza- 
tion in  this  country  to  place  its  members  in  the  most  strategical  and 
desirable  positions  from  their  standpoint? 

"A.  I  have  attempted  to  equip  myself. 

"Q.  Have  you  had  concern  about  the  incidence  of  Communist  in- 
filtration in  the  medical  profession  in  this  part  of  the  State? 

"A.  Very  much  so. 

"Q.  And  since  when  did  that  concern  manifest  itself? 


86  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

"A.  All  during  my  tour  of  duty  as  secretary-treasurer  and  later  as 
president  of  the  Los  Angeles  County  Medical  Association  I,  of  course, 
from  time  to  time  kept  hearing  recurring  stories  and  rumors  about 
some  infiltration  but  I  believe  the  most  significant  manifestation  was 
probably  in  the  year  1949  when  there  was  a  specific  attempt  on  the 
part  of  some  of  our  physician  members  to  participate  actively  in  the 
election  of  counsellors  in  that  fall  term. 

"Q.  As  counsellors  of  the  Los  Angeles  County  Medical  Association? 

"A.  Yes,  sir. 

"Q.  In  looking  over  the  people  behind  that  effort  did  any  of  the 
names  have  any  particular  significance  to  you? 

"A.  They  did.  While  I  couldn't  identify  the  names  of  those  indi- 
viduals as  members  of  the  Communist  Party  I  did  recognize  them  as 
what  might  be  called  'liberal'  in  the  accepted  term. 

"  Q.  So  that  in  your  view  at  least  there  was  a  concerted  effort  by  that 
particular  group  to  gain  political  control  of  the  association? 

"A.  There  was. 

"Q.  With  what  success  did  that  effort  meet? 

"A.  As  I  recall  a  poll  from  18  to  20  percent  of  the  total  number  of 
votes  cast. 

"Q.  Was  it  a  rather  solid  group  of  'progressive'  or  'liberal'  mem- 
bers of  your  profession  that  were  engaged  in  this  attempt  ? 

"A.  To  the  best  of  my  knowledge  that  is  so. 

' '  Q.  Did  you  later  come  into  possession  of  any  facts  that  accelerated 
that  concern  ?  Were  you  familiar  for  example  with  the  expulsion  of  the 
three  doctors  from  the  Cedars  of  Lebanon  Hospital? 

"A.  I  was. 

"Q.  Did  you  have  a  general  feeling  as  to  their  reputation,  as  to 
whether  or  not  they  were  radical  or  conservative  or  affiliated  with 
Communist  front  organizations  or  whether  they  might  be  suspected 
party  members? 

"A.  I  did. 

"Q.  And  what  was  that  feeling? 

"A.  That  they  most  certainly  were  very  radical  in  their  general 
concepts  and  in  their  public  expressions. 

"Q.  Who  were  they? 

"A.  Dr.  Murray  Abowitz  and  a  Dr.  Lippman  and  a  Dr.  Pennes. 
Please  note  I  am  not  testifying  that  these  individuals  were,  are  or  ever 
have  been  members  of  the  Communist  Party. 

"Q.  That  is  clearly  understood.  Did  you,  yourself,  ever  attend  any 
meetings  of  so-called  front  organizations? 

"A.  Not  to  my  knowledge. 

"Q.  Are  you  familiar  in  any  way  with  an  organization  known  as  the 
Association  of  Internes  and  Medical  Students? 


UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  87 

"A.  Yes.  I  have  watched  that  organization  through  the  years  devel- 
oped however  by  another  student  organization.  For  example,  there  was 
an  article  in  Medical  Economics  in  1950  entitled  'Leftist  Minority  Woos 
Future  Doctors. '  It  is  a  pretty  good  documentation  of  this  and  in  this 
article  are  to  be  found  mention  of  names,  dates  and  places. 

"Q.  Dr.  Alesen,  would  you  mind  opening  that  booklet  and  going 
through  it  page  by  page  and  picture  by  picture,  there  are  pictures  in 
it,  are  there  not? 

"A.  Yes,  sir. 

"Q.  And  will  you  give  the  committee  the  benefit  of  your  analysis 
of  the  material.  Not  all  of  it  but  in  general. 

"A.  I  think  the  important  fact  is  a  statement  here  on  the  first  page 
'AIMS  is  the  offspring  of  the  1941  wedlock  of  the  Interne  Council  of 
America  and  the  Association  of  Medical  Students.'  Then  I  think  it  is 
important  also  that  this  organization  has  published  or  did  until  re- 
cently, a  publication  called  The  Interne.  Also  that  from  time  to  time 
some  members  of  this  organization  have  participated  in  student  con- 
ferences in  foreign  countries.  For  example,  in  1949  there  was  the  fes- 
tival in  Budapest.  This  is  recounted  on  page  5.  This  was  sponsored  by 
the  World  Federation  of  Democratic  Youth.  At  that  time  Dr.  Shep- 
pard  C.  Thierman,  an  interne  at  Kings  County  Hospital,  Brooklyn, 
who  was  then  AIMS  vice  president,  helped  make  the  arrangements  for 
American  medical  students  who  wished  to  attend.  Apparently  the  whole 
tone  of  this  organization  AIMS  follows  the  typical  Communist  Party 
line  from  start  to  finish,  criticizing  of  course  all  conservative  viewpoints 
as  being  reactionary,  stupid  and  otherwise  unprogressive.  I  am  using 
my  own  language.  As  you  go  through  this  you  will  find  on  page  8  'Web 
of  Affiliations.  Among  recent  officers  of  the  Association  of  Internes  and 
Medical  Students  and  among  editorial-board  members  of  the  associa- 
tion's publication  The  Interne  a  number  have  been  cited  as  sponsors  of 
or  participants  in  the  activities  of  one  or  more  of  the  following  organi- 
zations and  publications.'  These  organizations  are  listed  some  18  or  20 
in  number  and  it  is  not  necessary  to  repeat  them,  but  I  think  they  ought 
to  be  read  into  the  record.  I  do  not  know  what  the  present  status  of  the 
organization  is.  I  haven't  followed  it  recently  but  it  is  my  impression 
that  probably  it  still  has  some  appeal. 

"Q.  There  was  a  chapter  at  U.  S.  C.  years  ago,  was  there  not? 

"A.  Yes,  sir. 

"Mr.  Combs:  I  want  to  make  it  clear  that  it  no  longer  exists  at  that 
institution  and  was  eradicated  largely  by  the  university  itself.  I  would 
like  to  have  this  introduced  in  evidence  and  I  think  in  consonance  with 
Dr.  Alesen 's  suggestion,  the  names  of  the  organizations  he  mentioned 
should  be  read  into  the  record  because  they  are  names  that  have  ap- 
peared in  reports  of  this  committee  during  its  entire  existence  of  nearly 


88  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

16  years.  So  I  think  it  would  be  well  to  read  these.  They  are  as  follows. 
On  page  8  :  American  Committee  for  Democracy  and  Intellectual  Free- 
dom, American  Committee  to  Save  Refugees,  American  Friends  of 
Spanish  Democracy,  Champion  which  is  a  publication,  Citizens  Com- 
mittee for  Harry  Bridges,  Civil  Bights  Congress,  which  as  the  com- 
mittee knows  is  the  legal  arm  of  the  Communist  Party  and  active  in 
Los  Angeles  at  the  present  time,  Coordinating  Committee  to  Lift  the 
Embargo,  Council  for  Pan-American  Democracy,  Friends  of  the  Abra- 
ham Lincoln  Brigade  which  was  the  military  arm  of  the  Communist 
Party  that  fought  in  the  Spanish  revolution,  International  Union  of 
Students,  Jefferson  School  of  Social  Science  which  is  comparable  to  the 
California  Labor  School  in  California,  Joint  Anti-Fascist  Refugee 
Committee,  League  of  American  Writers  which  the  committee  investi- 
gated in  1943,  National  Committee  to  Win  the  Peace,  National  Council 
of  American-Soviet  Friendship,  National  Federation  for  Constitutional 
Liberties,  New  Masses  which  is  a  publication,  North  American  Commit- 
tee to  Aid  Spanish  Democracy,  Reichstag  Fire  Trial  Anniversary  Com- 
mittee, School  for  Democracy,  Science  and  Society,  Spanish  Refugee 
Relief  Campaign,  and  World  Federation  of  Democratic  Youth,  which 
you  mentioned,  Dr.  Alesen,  in  connection  with  one  of  the  photographs 
showing  an  officer  of  AIMS,  Sheppard  C.  Thierman,  marching  and 
immediately  behind  him  is  a  large  picture  of  Stalin,  isn't  it? 

' '  A.  Yes,  sir. 

"Q.  Marching  in  the  Communist-sponsored  World  Youth  and  Stu- 
dent Festival  held  last  summer  in  Budapest,  Hungary.  Did  you  know 
anything,  Dr.  Alesen,  about  the  activities  of  AIMS  in  California  ? 

1 '  A.  No.  I  really  did  not  except  on  hearsay  and  that  was  very  vague. 

' '  Q.  You  had  heard  there  was  a  chapter  at  U.  S.  C.  ? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  You  don't  know  whether  there  was  one  at  U.  C.  L.  A.  at  any 
time,  do  you  ? 

"  A.  I  never  heard  of  there  being  one. 

"Mr.  Combs:  I  ask  that  this  be  received  in  evidence  as  the  exhibit 
next  in  order,  I  think  Exhibit  No.  4. 

"Q.  I  hand  you  a  photostatic  document.  I  frankly  don't  know 
whether  you  can  identify  this  or  not  because  I  have  never  asked  you 
at  any  time  about  it,  it  is  called  Progressive  Notes.  I  ask  you  if  you  have 
ever  seen  that  or  the  original  of  it  before  ? 

' '  A.  I  have  seen  a  copy  of  this  but  not  the  original.  I  could  not  iden- 
tify it,  Mr.  Combs. 

"Q.  Dr.  Alesen,  you  have  read  the  Communist  Manifesto,  have  you  not? 

"A.  Yes. 

* '  Q.  Would  you  mind  describing  for  the  benefit  of  the  committee  and 
its  records  the  basic  objective  of  the  Communist  Party?  I  mean  not 


UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  89 

from  an  ideological  standpoint,  but  from  the  standpoint  of  endeavoring 
to  place  its  members  in  professions  like  the  medical  profession,  the 
teaching  profession,  the  legal  profession  ? 

' '  A.  May  I  have  a  little  time  for  that  ? 

"  Q.  You  may. 

"A.  Of  course,  you  recall  that  Friedrich  Engels  and  Karl  Marx  wrote 
the  Manifesto  in  1848  and  they  stated  that  through  the  nations  of  the 
world  the  battle  for  democracy  would  take  place  in  different  stages  and 
different  manners,  depending  upon  the  degree  of  advancement  of  the  na- 
tion in  which  the  revolution  was  proceeding.  They  stated  also  that  in  the 
most  intelligently  equipped  countries  the  revolution  must  take  a  pattern 
following  upon  definite  steps.  First,  there  will  be  an  abolition  of  all 
property  in  land  and  application  of  all  rents  of  land  to  public  pur- 
poses ;  second,  by  the  adoption  of  a  progressive  or  graduated  income  tax. 
The  third  was  gift  and  inheritance  tax.  The  fourth  step  was  the  con- 
fiscation of  all  property.  The  fifth  was  the  control  of  all  finance  by  a 
central  bank  with  national  capital  and  a  federal  charter.  The  sixth  was 
the  central  control  of  communications  and  transportation.  The  seventh 
was  a  gradual  increase  in  the  lines  of  production  and  distribution 
owned  by  the  state  and,  further,  a  development  of  the  land  and  soil  in 
accordance  with  the  common  plan.  The  next  step  was  the  development 
of  land  or  agriculture.  Step  number  nine  was  the  gradual  abolition 
between  the  characteristics  of  city  and  country  life,  and  number  ten 
was  the  step  of  free  public  education  and  schools  for  all  children. 

"  If  I  had  time,  I  would  like  to  outline  a  few  of  the  degrees  in  which 
we  have  adopted  their  program  in  America  today.  I  would  like  your 
permission  to  make  a  few  general  statements  concerning  the  philosophy 
of  Communism.  May  I  present  a  definition  or  two  ? 

"Q.  Surely. 

"A.  Collectivism,  by  dictionary  definition,  is  a  broad  general  term 
indicating  the  ownership  of  production  and  distribution  by  a  group, 
that  is,  by  the  state,  in  contravention  to  private  ownership  of  distri- 
bution, which  is  the  characteristic  of  the  materialist  system.  Collec- 
tivism encourages  the  individual  to  deny  and  reject  responsibilities 
for  himself  and  to  transfer  that  responsibility  to  the  group.  So  defined, 
collectivism  includes  Naziism,  Fascism,  Communism,  Socialism,  State 
Socialism,  New  Dealism,  and  any  and  all  other  forms  of  paternalism 
in  which  the  individual  is  encouraged  to  deny  and  to  reject  responsi- 
bility for  himself  and  transfer  that  responsibility  to  the  group.  So  I 
think  Communism  is  a  violent  form  of  collectivism  of  revolutionary 
form,  and  we  must  be  very  careful  lest  we  adopt  a  completely  totalli- 
tarian  view  by  our  educational  system.  A  moment  ago  Mr.  Combs  read 
a  statement  by  Mr.  Foster  of  the  Communist  Party  and  he  charged  the 


90  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

medical  profession  with  being  reactionary.  I  wonder  if  Mr.  Foster 
knows  that  all  of  the  primitive  societies  of  man  were,  in  effect,  collec- 
tivistic  in  nature  and  did  in  fact  present  a  basis  practically  of  char- 
acteristics which  he  so  proudly  boasts  as  being  fundamental  in  Com- 
munist Russia.  The  American  mound  builders  were  collectivists.  "When 
Mr.  Foster  talks  about  reactionism  as  a  matter  of  fact  he  is  advocating 
a  complete  advocacy  of  freedom. 

"I  would  like  to  take  a  further  moment  if  I  may  and  introduce  a 
phase  which  I  think  has  been  neglected  which  I  call  a  biologic  phase 
of  the  subject.  If  you  recall,  about  eight  hundred  million  years  ago 
your  ancestors  and  mine  were  pleasuring  around  in  a  single-celled 
amoeba  and  during  the  past  eight  hundred  million  years  nature  has 
done  a  good  job  and  the  process  still  continues  in  spite  of  man's  efforts 
to  stop.  She  has  proceeded  in  three  ways:  first  of  all,  individual  pre- 
eminence. Second,  individual  responsibility.  Nature  insists  upon  indi- 
vidual reward,  there  is  no  exception  to  that  in  the  animal  societies. 
Either  she  insists  upon  a  very  rigid  restriction  of  the  uses  of  the  amoeba 
or  she  uses  the  amoeba  to  act  as  a  policeman  to  protect  the  individual 
from  the  group  or  against  his  fellows.  You  will  find  this  of  course,  that 
the  whole  collectivist  thesis  is  fundamentally  wrong  because  it  pre- 
sumes that  the  individual  is  unable  to  do  anything  for  himself  and  the 
state  is  glorified  and  the  individual  is  held  in  scorn. 

"Q.  Dr.  Alesen,  you  have  pointed  out  and  I  think  certainly  very 
eloquently,  the  close  relationship  between  Communism  as  a  most  violent 
form  of  collective  organization  and  certain  other  forms  that  are  a  bit 
more  gentle  in  their  approach.  In  your  opinion  and  based  of  course  on 
your  reading  and  analysis  of  the  problem,  do  you  believe  that  the 
Communist  Party  would  adopt  some  other  forms  of  collectivism  as  a 
temporary  expedient  in  ultimately  gaining  its  complete  objective  ? 

"A.  I  am  sure  that,  as  witness  their  point  seven  which  provides 
for  a  gradual  increase  in  the  control  of  the  means  of  production  and 
distribution  by  the  state  and  the  development  of  the  soil  according  to 
a  specific  program.  According  to  Mr.  Willis  Stone  we  now  have  in 
America  88  federal  corporations,  some  2,500  bureaus,  about  10  inter- 
national cartels,  all  doing  business  in  competition  with  the  private 
American  citizen.  Mr.  Stone  estimates  if  we  could  reach  these  enter- 
prises and  denationalize  them,  we  could  save  the  taxpayer  at  least  half 
the  federal  budget. 

"Q.  If  it  were  possible  to  organize  all  of  the  doctors  in  the  United 
States  into  one  single  group  it  wouldn't  be  necessary  to  recruit  all 
members  of  the  party;  then  the  concentrated  party  could  be  focused 
on  a  little  handful  that  ruled  the  organization  from  the  top.  Isn't  that 
correct  ? 


UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  91 

"A.  That  is  correct.  But  if  there  be  such  entities  as  rulers  from  the 
top,  those  individuals  who  are  selected  to  hold  the  offices  are  usually 
pretty  solid  citizens  and  I  am  not  casting  any  bouquets  at  myself,  and 
they  are  pretty  good  Americans. 

"Q.  Are  you  aware  of  any  so-called  front  organizations  by  name  in 
Los  Angeles  County  through  which  in  your  opinion  the  Communists 
have  been  or  are  now  operating? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  Did  you  ever  hear  of  the  medical  division  of  the  Arts,  Sciences 
and  Prof essions  Council? 

"A.  Yes,  sir. 

"Q.  Would  that  be  one  of  them? 

"A.  It  would. 

"Q.  Did  you  ever  hear  of  an  organization  known  as  the  Civil  Rights 
Congress  ? 

"A.  I  have. 

"Q.  Would  that  be  one  of  them? 

"A.  It  would. 

"Q.  Did  you  ever  hear  of  the  International  Workers  Order  ? 

"A.  I  have. 

"Q.  Would  that  be  one  of  them? 

"A.  It  would. 

"Q.  Can  you  name  any  other? 

"A.  Offhand,  I  can't. 

"Mr.  Combs:  I  think  that  is  all. 

"Q.  (By  Senator  McCarthy)  :  Dr.  Alesen,  as  president  of  the  State 
Medical  Society  have  you  found  that  this  situation  exists  in  other  places 
in  California? 

"A.  I  can't  answer  that  very  well,  Senator  McCarthy.  I  have  been 
very  closely  connected  with  the  Los  Angeles  Association.  No  other 
instance  has  come  to  my  attention. 

"Mr.  Combs :  May  Dr.  Alesen  be  excused? 

"A.  May  I  make  one  further  statement  for  the  record? 

"Q.  Yes. 

"A.  I  should  like  to  introduce  a  statement  defining  the  ideal 
economy,  and  I  would  like  to  define  the  ideal  economic  state  as  a  con- 
dition in  which  there  are  available  to  every  individual  living  within  it 
the  greatest  abundance  of  goods  and  services  at  prices  the  individual 
can  afford  to  pay  and  in  an  environment  in  which  he  is  stimulated  to 
produce  to  his  utmost  to  distribute  and  exchange  particularly  the 
products  of  his  brain  and  to  accumulate  for  his  own  independence. 

"Mr.  Combs:  Thank  you  very  much,  doctor. 


92  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

TESTIMONY  OF  DR.  JOSEPH  MANUEL  de  los  REYES,  M.D. 

"Q.  (By  Mr.  Combs)  :  Will  you  state  your  full  name,  please  Dr. 
Reyes,  and  your  address  ? 

"A.  Joseph  Manuel  de  los  Reyes.  My  office  address  is  2010  Wilshire 
Boulevard.  I  am  a  doctor  of  medicine.  My  home  address  is  1405  East 
Mountain  Street  in  Glendale,  California. 

"Q.  Doctor,  is  it  customary  to  address  you  as  Dr.  Reyes,  or  de  los 
Reyes  ? 

"A.  The  real  name  is  de  los  Reyes,  but  I  have  been  called  all  kinds 
of  names. 

"Q.  Dr.  de  los  Reyes,  have  you  held  any  positions  in  the  Los  Angeles 
County  Medical  Association? 

"A.  I  have,  sir. 

"Q.  And  what  are  those  positions? 

"A.  Since  1945,  a  member  of  the  Council  of  the  Los  Angeles  County 
Medical  Association.  In  1954,  vice  president  of  the  Los  Angeles 
County  Medical  Association.  In  other  words,  I  am  vice  president  now. 
My  term  of  office  will  expire  January  1st. 

"Q.  Have  you  had  anything  to  do  with  the  public  relations  depart- 
ment of  the  association? 

"A.  Yes,  sir.  I  have  been  chairman  of  the  public  relations  depart- 
ment committee  of  the  Los  Angeles  County  Medical  Association. 

"Q.  During  what  years? 

"A.  That  was  1947  and  1948,  if  I  remember  correctly. 

"Q.  During  the  time  that  the  House  Committee  on  Un-American 
Activities  held  its  meetings  in  Los  Angeles,  was  there  some  effort  to 
propagandize  against  those  hearings  on  the  part  of  some  of  those  who 
were  called  before  the  committee? 

"A.  There  was. 

"Q.  And  did  the  medical  association  through  you  take  any  steps  to 
counteract  that  propaganda? 

"A.  I  made  a  public  statement  that  the  Los  Angeles  County  Medical 
Association  would  welcome  any  investigation  of  its  members  regarding 
their  patriotism  and  whether  they  belonged  to  any  subversive  organiza- 
tions. 

"Q.  Dr.  de  los  Reyes,  you  yourself  have  had  considerable  practical 
experience  in  the  counter-Communist  cause  and  you  have  had  experi- 
ence not  only  here  but  in  Cuba,  I  understand,  in  combatting  Communist 
infiltration  and,  in  addition,  you  attended,  did  you  not,  one  or  more 
meetings  in  Los  Angeles  of  alleged  front  organizations? 

"A.  That  is  right,  sir. 

"Q.  Would  you  mind  describing  for  us,  please,  your  experiences  in 
Cuba  so  far  as  Communism  is  concerned. 


UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES  IN  CALIFORNIA  93 

"A.  If  I  won't  bore  the  committee,  when  I  graduated  from  Jeffer- 
son Medical  College  in  Philadelphia  I  went  down  to  Cuba.  At  that 
time,  of  course,  Cuba  was  in  the  midst  of  a  depression.  Although  we 
didn't  suffer  the  depression  here  until  1929,  the  depression  really- 
started  in  Latin  America  in  1923.  At  that  time  there  was  an  effort 
made  to  indoctrinate  the  students  at  the  National  University  by  creat- 
ing riots  and  revolution.  It  was  thought,  and  justly  so,  that  it  was 
more  or  less  an  effort  on  the  part  of  the  Socialist  movement  down 
there.  Later  on,  infiltration  of  the  school  there  took  place  and  the 
medical  profession  found  itself  in  the  precarious  position  of  having 
the  Legislature  of  Cuba  pass  laws  that  would  have  been  inimical  to 
the  welfare  of  the  people  of  Cuba  and  also  the  medical  profession.  Due 
to  the  fact  that  the  doctors  there  would  have  been  socialized  and  that 
their  payments  for  their  services,  etc.,  would  be  subjected  to  a  paternal 
form  of  government,  the  Medical  Association  of  Cuba  threatened  to 
call  a  strike.  In  other  words,  threatened  to  use  the  same  methods 
that  are  so  common  to  the  Socialists  and  Communists  and  the  govern- 
ment still  persisted  in  socializing  the  medical  profession  of  Cuba.  We 
went  on  strike.  I  was  practicing  medicine  there  and  for  48  hours  we 
refused  to  do  any  of  our  usual  work  or  sign  any  death  certificates 
except  we  saw  everybody  that  needed  medical  attention  whether  emer- 
gency or  otherwise.  The  flood  of  telegrams  and  letters  and  the  howls 
of  the  people  of  Cuba  were  such  that  they  forgot  anything  about  laws 
and  the  individual  dignity  of  the  Cuban  people,  not  only  in  the  medical 
profession  but  the  rest  of  the  population,  was  saved,  I  believe,  by  the 
drastic  action  taken  by  the  medical  profession  of  Cuba.  I  was  part 
and  parcel  of  it  and  I  was  proud  that  I  did  so.  I  had  been  rather 
interested  in  some  of  the  teachings  and  some  of  the  propaganda 
that  had  been  going  in  Latin  America  because  down  there  it  started 
earlier  than  it  started  in  the  United  States,  at  least  it  was  more  open. 
And  I  read  quite  a  bit  about  what  Karl  Marx  had  to  say  and  I  came 
upon  one  of  his  utterances  which  stated  the  keystone  of  the  arch  of 
the  socialistic  state  is  the  socialization  of  medicine.  You  have  heard 
the  other  doctors  here,  you  Senators,  and  what  they  said  pertaining 
to  the  infiltration  and  the  socialization  of  medicine.  Lenin  taught  it; 
Stalin  taught  it ;  and  it  has  been  epitomized  by  the  Communists  through- 
out the  world,  the  fact  that  if  they  gain  control  of  the  medical  pro- 
fession in  any  nation,  they  have  taken  a  tremendous  step  toward  the 
totalitarian  form  of  government  of  that  country. 

I  was  in  Guatemala  in  1931  and  saw  what  they  were  doing  there. 
Gentlemen,  you  have  to  remember  that  in  those  countries  not  like  the 
United  States  we  have  no  middle  class.  There  is  the  poor  peon  and  the 
person  that  has  something  and  you  cannot  by  a  process  of  revolution 


94  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

change  the  peon  into  an  educated  individual  any  more  than  you  can  go 
ahead  and  change  the  educated  individual  into  a  peon.  They  at  that  time 
were  propagandizing  the  people  there  and  some  of  our  so-called  leaders 
in  this  country  and  even  the  wife  of  the  President  of  the  United  States 
came  down  there  to  a  political  meeting  in  Mexico  and  tried  in  a 
subtle  manner  to  pull  for  the  election  of  a  gentleman  that  rightfully 
or  wrongfully  had  the  stigma  of  being  a  Socialist  in  Mexico.  While 
I  was  in  Guatemala  and  while  I  was  in  Honduras  I  saw  what  they 
were  trying  to  do  to  those  people  down  there.  This  thing  that  hap- 
pened in  Guatemala  wasn't  just  a  conspiracy  of  the  moment.  This 
thing  had  roots  years  and  years  ago,  especially  when  we  in  the  United 
States  were  foolish  enough  to  recognize  Russia,  the  worst  atheistic, 
criminal  dictatorship  the  world  has  ever  seen.  My  father  went  to 
school  in  this  country  but  I  was  born  in  Cuba.  I  became  an  American 
citizen  by  choice  because  I  considered  it  the  greatest  and  finest  country 
in  the  world.  But  I  began  to  see  the  American  people  were  indolent 
and  didn't  realize  the  danger,  and  still  there  are  many  that  do  not, 
and  it  is  necessary  for  us  in  the  professions,  some  of  us  that  perhaps 
take  interest  in  community  life,  to  try  and  explain  things  to  the  people 
of  the  United  States.  In  1934,  I  started  practicing  in  Los  Angeles. 
In  1936,  I  was  approached  to  join  in  the  war  in  Spain.  We  started 
in  1936  a  speaker's  bureau  in  the  Los  Angeles  County  Medical  Asso- 
ciation of  which  I  was  one  of  the  founders,  and  we  undertook  to 
explain  to  the  people  what  the  medical  profession  meant  in  the  United 
States ;  what  we  had  in  mind  when  we  took  the  Hippocratic  oath.  Some 
time  later  when  I  became  chairman  of  that  speaker's  bureau,  I  took  it 
upon  myself  and  the  men  that  were  with  me  to  explain  to  the  people 
what  socialization  of  medicine  in  the  United  States  would  mean  and 
for  that  we  were  vilified  and  our  characters  were  assassinated  until 
Last  year  I  was  called  the  'Joe  McCarthy'  of  the  medical  profession  of 
Los  Angeles  and  I  don't  mean,  you,  Senator.  We  have  in  Los  Angeles 
County  a  little  group  that,  for  some  reason  or  other,  believe  that  we 
have  to  be  changed;  that  the  medical  profession  in  the  United  States 
is  a  trust  and  they  came  out  with  all  kinds  of  propaganda.  And  it  will 
be  necessary  for  some  of  us  to  take  the  brunt  of  the  matter  and  explain 
it  so  that  perhaps  the  people  of  America  will  realize  what  is  going  on. 
We  have  tried  to  talk  to  them  about  the  medical  profession,  about  our 
country  and  what  it  means.  When  you  find  them  telling  you  about 
segregation  and  about  discrimination  because  of  race,  creed  and  color, 
it  makes  me  laugh.  Here  I  am,  a  Latin  American  b}^  birth  and  I  have 
found  no  discrimination  anywhere.  On  the  contrary,  everywhere  I  have 
been  accepted.  Sure,  I  may  have  some  detractors,  who  has  not  ?  I  belong 
to  12  different  hospitals  in  the  county.  I  have  been  on  the  executive 


UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  95 

board  of  one  of  the  largest  hospitals  here.  I  am  vice  president  of  the 
Los  Angeles  County  Medical  Association.  Does  that  mean  that  the 
medical  profession  has  discriminated  ?  I  have  taken  care  of  white  and 
black  and  I  have  never  seen  that  discrimination  that  the  Communist 
Party  and  the  front  organizations  say  exists  in  Los  Angeles  County. 
I  have  never  seen  it.  Probably  there  is,  we  wouldn't  be  human  if  there 
weren't;  however,  I  haven't  seen  it.  As  chairman  of  a  committee  of  the 
Los  Angeles  County  Medical  Association  it  is  my  duty  to  talk  to  men 
who  apply  for  membership  in  the  association.  My  duty  is  to  talk  to 
them  about  ethics  and  organization  and  what  it  means  to  be  a  member 
of  the  Los  Angeles  County  Medical  Association.  And,  gentlemen,  I 
always  make  it  a  point,  when  a  man  is  not  American  born  or  if  he  isn't 
a  white  man,  to  be  the  first  to  shake  his  hand.  I  am  the  first  one  who 
comes  up  and  shakes  his  hand ;  then  I  personally  interview  the  man  and 
tell  him  that  we  welcome  him  in  the  Los  Angeles  County  Medical 
Association  and  we  welcome  him  with  open  arms  if  he  applies  for  mem- 
bership. Maybe  I  am  speaking  too  long. 

"  Q.  Not  at  all.  Do  you  have  any  more  to  say  ? 

"A.  Go  ahead  with  your  questions. 

"Q.  Dr.  de  los  Keyes,  in  addition  to  the  things  you  have  mentioned, 
which  certainly  gives  you  a  stature  of  practical  experience  in  this  field, 
you  became  aware  of  the  fact  that  the  Los  Angeles  County  Medical 
Association  had  been  selected  as  a  target  for  infiltration  by  the  Com- 
munists, did  you  not  ? 

"A.  That  is  right. 

' '  Q.  About  how  long  ago  did  you  become  aware  of  that  fact  ? 

"A.  In  1936,  when  the  doctors  were  propagandized. 

"Q.  "When  you  were  asked  to  join  with  the  group  that  was  fighting 
in  the  Spanish  Revolution,  was  that  the  Abraham  Lincoln  Brigade? 

"A.  That  is  right. 

"Q.  Comprised  for  the  most  part  of  Communists  who  were  sent  to 
Spain  to  fight  in  behalf  of  the  Communists? 

"A.  So  I  understand. 

"Q.  Which,  of  course,  you  declined? 

"A.  Very  much  so. 

"Q.  Since  that  time  have  you  taken  it  upon  yourself  to  actually  go 
to  and  attend  some  of  the  so-called  front  meetings  in  the  city  of  Los 
Angeles  ? 

"A.  I  have,  sir.  However,  because  I  was  pretty  well  known  and  my 
utterances  were  such  that  I  was  called  a  very  rabid  anti- Communist,  I 
am  sure  I  was  never  persona  grata  in  some  of  the  meetings  I  attended. 

"Q.  Will  you  give  me  the  names  of  the  organizations  whose  meetings 
you  attended? 


96  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN  CALIFORNIA 

"A.  Yes.  I  attended  one  of  the  Arts  and  Sciences  Council  meetings. 

"Q.  The  Arts,  Sciences  and  Professions? 

"A.  Yes,  that  is  what  I  mean. 

"Q.  And  did  you  attend  one  that  was  held  at  the  Clark  Hotel? 

"A.  I  did. 

"Q.  Was  that  the  Arts,  Sciences  and  Professions  meeting  you  have 
mentioned  ? 

"A.  No,  that  was  the  Los  Angeles  Chapter  of  the  National  Lawyers 
Guild. 

"Q.  Did  you  go  there  alone  or  with  someone  else? 

' '  A.  I  went  with  a  doctor. 

"Q.  That  was  held  in  the  Clark  Hotel  on  what  date? 

"A.  July  31st,  1951. 

"Q.  About  what  time  did  you  enter  the  place  of  the  meeting? 

"A.  Sometime  about  noon — just  before  noon. 

"Q.  Was  it  a  luncheon  meeting? 

"A.  It  was  a  luncheon  meeting. 

"Q.  Attended  by  approximately  how  many  people? 

"A.  I  don 't  know  exactly  the  actual  number,  but  I  imagine  perhaps 
35  or  40. 

"Q.  At  that  meeting  was  there  any  written  propaganda  material 
distributed  ? 

"A.  Yes,  sir. 

"Q.  Do  you  have  some  of  it  with  you? 

"A.  I  do.  It  is  a  little  booklet  called  Yours  for  a  Genuine  Brotherhood. 

"Q.  Will  you  turn  to  the  first  page,  please,  Dr.  de  los  Reyes,  and  you 
will  see  there  a  list  of  the  sponsors. 

"A.  That  is  right. 

"Q.  Do  you  recognize  any  of  those  people  as  being  present  at  the 
meeting  ? 

"A.  No,  but  I  was  told  that  a  reporter  from  the  People's  World  was 
there. 

"Q.  What  was  his  name? 

"A.  Donald  C.  Wheeldon. 

"Q.  His  name  appears  second  from  the  last  in  column  two  of  the 
list  of  sponsors,  does  it  not  ? 

"A.  That  is  right.  However,  I  don't  know  the  gentleman. 

"Q.  You  don't  know  whether  he  was  there  or  not  but  you  were  told 
he  was  present? 

"A.  Yes.  And  he  signed  this  booklet,  or  at  least  his  name  is  there. 

"Q.  Before  you  had  lunch  did  you  present  a  ticket  or  did  you  buy  a 
ticket  for  the  lunch,  or  just  how  did  you  work  that  part  of  it. 

"A.  This  other  doctor  and  I  decided  that  the  best  way  for  us  not  to 
be  kicked  out  in  case  our  names  were  mentioned  or  we  were  recognized, 


UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  97 

was  to  buy  the  tickets  immediately  or  pay  for  our  luncheon  and  then 
we  had  a  right  to  stay  and  eat  lunch,  and  that  is  what  we  did,  much  to 
the  chagrin  of  the  waiter,  who  did  not  want  to  take  our  money. 

"Q.  Prior  to  the  time  you  sat  down  to  the  lunch,  were  you  and  the 
other  doctor  who  accompanied  you  seated  alone  at  a  table  or  were  there 
other  people  seated  at  the  table  with  you? 

'A.  Everybody  was  milling  around  and  they  came  over  to  talk  to  us. 
Q.  So  you  would  hear  what  was  being  said? 
'A.  Yes. 

Q.  And  you  talked  to  some  of  the  people? 
A.  That  is  correct. 

'Q.  What  was  your  general  impression  of  the  tenor  of  the  meeting 
— what  kind  of  a  meeting  was  it? 

"A.  The  tenor  of  the  meeting  was  exactly  what  the  speakers  later 
on  expounded;  it  was  the  same  thing  you  find  anywhere  you  go  to 
socialistic  or  Communist  meetings  and,  between  you  and  I,  I  see  very 
little  difference  between  Socialists  and  Communists.  They  had  the  little 
book  I  mentioned  all  ready  and  spoke  about  racial  discrimination,  how 
hospitals  were  not  allowing  colored  individuals  to  have  the  same  rights 
that  white  people  had;  that  because  of  the  fact  that  they  were  of  that 
race  they  would  have  discrimination  in  these  different  hospitals;  and 
after  they  talked  about  things  like  that,  then  they  began  to  say  this 
was  the  time  to  go  ahead  and  do  something.  That  suits  could  be  brought 
against  these  hospitals ;  that  the  penal  code  and  civil  code  of  the  State 
of  California  and  also  the  Federal  Government  prohibited  discrimina- 
tion and  that  they  should  make  test  cases  of  this;  that  they  should  go 
and  put  pressure  also  on  the  Community  Chest  and  see  that  these  hos- 
pitals that  allegedly  were  resorting  to  discrimination  should  not  re- 
ceive any  money  collected  by  the  Community  Chest.  That  delegations 
and  individuals  and  also  groups  should  visit  these  hospitals,  etc.,  and 
so  on. 

"Q.  And  that  meeting  was  attended  by  representatives  of  the  Arts, 
Sciences  and  Professions  Council? 

"A.  And  the  National  Lawyers  Guild.  There  was  one  man  I  knew 
that  belonged  to  the  Arts,  Sciences  and  Professions  Council. 

"Q.  Do  you  remember  his  name? 

"A.  Dr.  Thomas  Perry. 

"Q.  And  he  spoke,  did  he? 

"A.  That  is  right. 

"Q.  How  long  did  the  meeting  last,  Doctor? 

"A.  The  same  as  the  usual  meeting  lasts — an  hour  to  an  hour  and 
a  half.  I  also  have  here  a  copy  of  a  letter  that  was  sent  under  the  sig- 
nature of  Dr.  Louis  Kobinson,  D.D.S.,  Chairman  of  the  Medical  Divi- 


98  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

sion,  Arts,  Sciences  and  Professions  Council,  130  South  Robertson, 
Suite  No.  4,  Beverly  Hills,  California.  This  is  called  the  '  End-Discrim- 
ination Committee.'  It  is  also  signed  by  Wilbert  Z.  Gordon,  Executive 
Secretary  of  the  Medical  Division.  This  is  a  letter  that  was  sent  to  dif- 
ferent hospitals  and  medical  groups  here  in  Los  Angeles  and  there  was 
a  questionnaire  asking  questions  about  discrimination,  segregation,  and 
so  forth. 

"Q.  That  letter  was  sent  by  the  Arts,  Sciences  and  Professions 
Council  Medical  Division  to  the  various  hospitals  in  Los  Angeles  for 
the  purpose  of  making  a  survey  to  determine  the  extent  of  racial  dis- 
crimination ? 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  Some  of  the  hospitals,  according  to  the  statements  in  this  book- 
let, ignored  the  questionnaire,  did  they  not? 

"A.  That  is  correct.  At  least,  so  the  book  says. 

"Q.  And  it  lists  the  hospitals  beginning  on  page  11,  you  will  note, 
Doctor,  in  alphabetical  order  in  the  chapter  headed  "Hospitals"? 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  Barlow  Sanatorium,  California  Lutheran  Hospital,  Cedars  of 
Lebanon  Hospital,  Culver  City  Hospital,  Eye  and  Ear  Hospital,  Glen- 
dale  Sanitarium  and  Hospital — that  hospital,  incidentally,  failed  to 
respond  to  the  questionnaire;  so  did  the  Eye  and  Ear  Hospital  and 
the  Culver  City  Hospital,  and  so  did  the  Cedars  of  Lebanon  Hospital 
and  so  did  the  California  Lutheran  Hospital — the  Barlow  Sanatorium 
apparently  sent  the  questionnaire  back.  And  the  next  was  the  Harbor 
General  Hospital  and  they  ignored  the  questionnaire. 

"A.  That  is  right. 

"Q.  The  Hollywood  Presbyterian  Hospital  declined  to  fill  out  the 
questionnaire;  the  Hospital  of  the  Good  Samaritan  also  ignored  the 
questionnaire;  the  Huntington  Memorial  Hospital  took  a  similar  atti- 
tude, and  the  Japanese  Hospital  of  Los  Angeles  also  did. 

"A.  If  I  might  interject 

"Q.  Yes. 

"A.  Here  is  supposed  to  be  a  racial  minority.  These  people  are  sup- 
posed to  be  working  for  these  poor  people,  but  here  is  a  Japanese  Hos- 
pital and  they  refuse  to  answer  because  they  realized  where  it  came 
from. 

"Q.  Then  the  Long  Beach  Hospital  took  similar  action;  then  the 
Los  Angeles  Children 's  Hospital — while  the  statement  is  not  made  cate- 
gorically that  they  did  reply,  I  assume  they  did.  Then  the  Los  Angeles 
General  Hospital  with  3,865  beds  replied  but  said  no  information  could 
be  given.  The  Los  Angeles  Sanatorium  at  Duarte  replied  to  the  ques- 
tionnaire. The  Methodist  Hospital  of  Southern  California  declined  to 


UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  99 

reply.  The  Orthopedic  Hospital  did  reply  apparently,  so  did  the  Physi- 
cians and  Surgeons  Hospital  in  Glendale.  The  Queen  of  the  Angels  Hos- 
pital declined  to  reply,  and  so  did  the  Santa  Fe  Coastline  Hospital,  and 
so  did  the  Santa  Monica  Hospital  and  the  Seaside  Memorial  Hospital 
in  Long  Beach,  and  the  St.  Johns  Hospital  at  Santa  Monica ;  St.  Josephs 
Hospital  did  reply,  so  did  St.  Luke's  Hospital,  and  St.  Mary's  Long 
Beach  Hospital  replied.  St.  Vincent's  Hospital  declined  to  reply;  Tem- 
ple Hospital  did;  White  Memorial  Hospital  did  not,  nor  did  some  of 
the  medical  groups  set  forth  on  page  25  and  the  medical  and  dental 
schools.  The  University  of  Southern  California  School  for  Medicine  de- 
clined to  fill  out  the  questionnaire  and  the  University  of  Southern  Cali- 
fornia School  of  Dentistry  did  supply  information.  Then  the  conclu- 
sions and  proposals  of  the  Arts,  Sciences  and  Professions  Council  are 
set  forth  on  pages  38  and  39  of  the  pamphlet.  Do  you  intend  to  submit 
your  pamphlet  in  evidence  as  an  exhibit,  Doctor  ? 

"A.  Yes,  sir,  and  this  letter  also. 

' '  Mr.  Combs :  May  these  be  marked  exhibits  next  in  order,  these  two 
exhibits  ? 

• '  Chairman  Burns :  Yes,  Exhibits  5  and  6.  This  one  will  be  marked 
as  Exhibit  5  and  the  questionnaire  as  Exhibit  6. 

"Q.  (By  Mr.  Combs)  :  Doctor,  did  you  attend  any  other  meetings  of 
any  other  organizations  that  were  alleged  to  be  Communist  fronts? 

"A.  I  attended  one.  The  other  one  that  I  attended  was  the  Science 
and  Professions. 

"Q.  When  was  that  meeting  held? 

"A.  Approximately  two  years  ago,  I  don't  remember  the  date. 

"Q.  And  do  you  remember  where  the  meeting  occurred? 

"A.  It  occurred  in  that  church  on  Eighth  Street. 

1 '  Q.  The  Unitarian  ? 

"A.  That  is  right. 

"Q.  Dr.  Fritchman's  church? 

"A.  That  is  correct 

"Q.  Was  he  there  when  you  attended? 

"A.  I  didn't  see  him,  I  don't  know  him. 

' '  Q.  Have  you  heard  of  him  ? 

"A.  Yes,  quite  a  bit. 

"Q.  Will  you  describe  that  meeting,  please. 

* '  A.  The  meeting,  if  I  remember  correctly,  was  to  honor  the  members 
of  the  medical  profession  that  were  colored  and  again  the  gist  of  the 
whole  thing  was  similar  to  what  this  one  was  that  I  attended  at  the 
Clark  Hotel;  that,  although  many  men  of  the  colored  race  had  been 
badly  treated  due  to  the  fact  we  have  so  much  discrimination  in  this 
country,  that  they  had  been  allowed  to  become  prominent  because  of 
the  subjugation  and  the  discrimination  that  has  taken  place  in  the 


100  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

United  States  regarding  other  races  and  minorities.  And  so  it  went  on 
and  on.  Dr.  Murray  Abowitz  was  the  presiding  officer. 

"Q.  He  was  mentioned  this  morning  as  having  been  expelled  from 
the  Cedars  of  Lebanon  Hospital  because  of  his  refusal  to  answer  ques- 
tions about  his  Communist  affiliations. 

"A.  Yes.  Dr.  Thomas  Perry  was  also  in  that  meeting. 

"Q.  Did  he  speak  on  the  second  occasion? 

"A.  He  did.  I  have  a  few  notes  here.  The  thing  that  he  brought  out 
besides  the  discrimination,  and  so  forth,  and  the  gist  of  it  was  that  suits 
should  be  instituted  because  this  was  a  wonderful  opportunity  to  show 
the  people  what  the  Negroes  and  the  Mexican- Americans — I  don 't  know 
why  he  said  Mexican- Americans  instead  of  Latin  Americans — had  to 
undergo  under  the  society  in  which  we  live.  So  they  threatened  court 
action  to  bar  tax  exemption  to  hospitals  who  discriminated,  breach  of 
contract  suits,  if  I  understand  that  correctly.  It  was  that  if  a  patient 
came  in  and  was  put  in  a  two-bed  room,  or  was  changed  or  didn't 
receive  the  attention  they  were  supposed  to  receive,  they  could  bring 
this  to  court;  that  the  civil  and  criminal  courts  of  the  State  of  Cali- 
fornia and  the  Federal  Government  prohibit  racial  discrimination  and 
they  should  bring  suits  in  courts  so  that  the  people  in  the  State  of 
California  and  the  Nation  should  know  what  was  going  on  and,  natur- 
ally, by  implication,  if  they  were  the  ones  that  brought  this  suit,  they 
were  the  ones  that  were  the  guardians  of  the  freedom  and  nondiscrimi- 
nation of  people.  The  pressure  against  the  Community  Chest  was  that 
the  Community  Chest  was  to  refuse  to  give  any  money  to  any  hospital 
that  practiced  any  discrimination;  that  individual  and  group  delega- 
tions should  go  to  the  hospitals  and  protest;  that  the  members  of  the 
staffs  of  those  hospitals  should  be  contacted  and  the  opinions  of  the 
men  or  women  that  were  contacted  should  be  made  known  to  them  so 
that  they  could  bring  pressure  on  the  staffs  of  those  hospitals ;  that  they 
should  play  up  this  discrimination  in  every  possible  way  through  public 
meetings  and  letters,  to  keep  the  public  informed  of  what  was  going 
on  so  that  the  people  would  be  aroused  and  the  people  would  take  ap- 
propriate measures  to  end  such  actions  on  the  part  of  the  hospitals 
of  Los  Angeles  County. 

"Q.  Dr.  de  los  Reyes,  did  you  make  any  determination  as  to  the 
character  of  the  first  meeting  you  attended — basically,  what  kind  of  an 
organization  did  you  conclude  it  was  ? 

"A.  Well,  after  seeing  the  tone  of  their  conversation  and  the  utter- 
ances of  the  speakers  and  having  seen  the  same  thing  in  the  tropics,  and 
other  things  I  have  attended  here  similar  to  that  and  after  seeing  what 
has  happened  in  the  foreign  relations  of  this  country  when  we  sent  the 
so-called  brain  boys  down  to  Latin  America  to  try  to  socialize  them,  I 
came  to  the  conclusion  they  were  inimical  to  the  welfare  of  this  Nation, 


UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN  CALIFORNIA  101 

and  that  they  were,  if  not  part  and  parcel  of,  at  least  were  the  willing 
tools  of  that  criminal  conspiracy,  atheistic  in  nature,  known  as  the 
Communist  Party. 

"Q.  And  that  is  true  of  each  of  the  organizations  you  have  attended, 
or  each  of  the  meetings,  is  it  ? 

"A.  That  is  right. 

"Q.  Dr.  de  los  Reyes,  I  want  to  ask  you  now  the  same  questions 
I  have  asked  the  other  witnesses.  Are  you  now  or  have  you  ever  been  a 
member  of  the  Communist  Party? 

"A.  No,  sir. 

■ '  Mr.  Combs :  Thank  you,  that  is  all. 

"Q.  (By  Chairman  Burns)  :  Doctor,  are  colored  physicians  admitted 
to  the  staffs  of  the  various  Los  Angeles  hospitals? 

"A.  I  can  say  this,  that  in  the  California  Lutheran  Hospital  where 
I  do  most  of  my  work,  I  know  at  least  one  colored  doctor  who  is  there. 
Dr.  King  and  Dr.  Robinson  are  two  colored  doctors.  I  never  heard 
anybody,  at  least  not  in  my  presence  during  the  three  years  I  was  a 
member  of  the  executive  committee  of  that  hospital,  cast  any  aspersions 
on  either  one  of  those  doctors  or  say  anything  pertaining  to  their  color. 

"Q.  And  the  same  policy  was  followed  as  to  admittance  of  the 
patients,  was  it  ? 

"A.  That  is  right.  I  have  had  colored  patients  at  the  California 
Hospital  and  we  have  colored  nurses  and  student  nurses  at  that  hos- 
pital. 

"Q.  Are  nonwhite  physicians  admitted  to  membership  in  the  Los 
Angeles  County  Medical  Association? 

"A.  Yes,  sir.  I  mentioned  a  few  minutes  ago  that  whenever  we  have 
a  meeting  and  when  they  come  in  I  as  chairman  make  it  a  point  to 
welcome  them  as  chairman  of  the  committee  into  the  membership  of  the 
Los  Angeles  County  Medical  Association.  As  a  matter  of  fact,  one  of  the 
doctors  here,  Dr.  Alsberge,  was  the  first  man  to  propose  that  we  should 
have  one  colored  gentleman  because  of  the  fact  for  some  particular 
reason  that  these  doctors  of  Latin  American  extraction  and  some  of  the 
colored  doctors  perhaps  might  feel  that  they  were  not  welcome  and  that 
we  would  have  difficulty  in  trying  to  get  them  to  join  us  and  attend  our 
meetings,  but  we  elected  overwhelmingly  and  unanimously  a  member  of 
the  colored  race  to  the  House  of  Delegates  of  the  California  Medical 
Association,  which  is  the  ruling  body  of  the  state  medical  association. 

"Q.  (By  Senator  Thompson)  :  Doctor,  is  there  any  discrimination 
whatsoever  because  of  race,  color  or  creed  in  the  Los  Angeles  County 
Medical  Association? 

"A.  No,  sir,  and  I  am  a  living  example  of  that.  I  belong  to  the  con- 
sulting surgical  staffs  here  of  hospitals  that  are  predominantly  Jewish 


102  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

and  hospitals  that  are  Protestant  and  Catholic.  On  the  contrary,  every- 
where I  have  gone  the  hand  of  friendship  has  been  extended  to  me. 

"Q.  Doctor,  can  you  tell  me  what  percentage  of  physicians  and 
surgeons  belong  to  the  Los  Angeles  County  Medical  Association? 

"A.  We  have  6,200  members.  I  understand  there  are  about  2,000 
other  M.D.  's  in  the  county  that  do  not  belong  to  the  Los  Angeles 
County  Medical  Association. 

"Q.  Is  there  any  reason  why  they  don't  belong? 

"A.  I  spoke  twice,  as  the  Chairman  of  the  Speakers  Bureau  of  the 
Los  Angeles  County  Medical  Association,  to  groups  of  colored  doctors 
here  in  the  city  and  I  propounded  that  question,  and  some  of  them 
were  frank  to  say  that  they  thought  the  white  doctors  would  discrim- 
inate, and  I  made  it  a  point  to  tell  them,  if  they  would  send  in  their 
applications  I  would  be  the  first  one  to  shake  their  hands  when  they 
entered.  I  spoke  to  the  auxiliary  of  the  colored  groups,  which  is  com- 
posed of  the  wives  of  the  colored  doctors,  and  I  welcomed  them.  And 
I  spoke  to  the  president  of  the  Women's  Auxiliary  of  the  Los  Angeles 
County  Medical  Association  and  told  them  to  extend  an  invitation  to 
these  girls  to  come  in  and  join,  and  many  of  them  have. 

"Q.  Doctor,  are  you  saying  that  the  greater  percentage  of  the 
people  that  do  not  belong  to  the  association  are  of  different  color? 

"A.  No,  sir.  We  don't  have  so  very  many  colored  doctors.  I  would 
be  guessing,  but  I  would  say  that  perhaps  we  have  about  a  hundred 
or  maybe  a  hundred  and  twenty.  We  have  I  think  about  40  or  50  of 
them  that  are  members  of  the  Los  Angeles  County  Medical  Association, 
that  is,  of  the  Latin-American  doctors.  The  booklet  says  'Mexican- 
American' — I  can't  understand  that.  We  have  the  Latin-American 
Association  here  and  they  put  me  on  their  board  of  directors.  There 
are  about  75  to  80  doctors  in  there.  I  daresay  about  45  to  50  of  them 
or  probably  more  than  that  belong  to  the  Los  Angeles  County  Medical 
Association.  So  I  would  say  that  a  large  percentage  of  those  that  do 
not  belong  to  the  Los  Angeles  County  Medical  Association  are  Amer- 
ican doctors. 

"Q.  I  will  ask  you  this:  to  what  do  you  attribute  the  basic  reason 
these  people  do  not  belong  to  the  association? 

"A.  I  attribute  it  to  some  of  the  people  that  come  to  this  country 
or  perhaps  come  from  the  south ;  for  example,  it  would  have  been  easy 
for  me  to  take  the  same  attitude.  I  was  a  foreigner  here  in  this  country 
and  it  would  have  been  easy  for  me  to  carry  a  chip  on  my  shoulder  and 
say  I  won't  do  anything  because  they  won't  accept  me.  But  it  is  up  to 
us,  and  I  have  tried  and  I  know  the  other  officers  of  the  association 
and  those  who  succeeded  me  and  those  who  preceded  me  have  tried  to 
explain  to  them  that  such  a  thing  does  not  exist  here  in  this  country. 


UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES  IN  CALIFORNIA  103 

Perhaps  in  rare  instances,  yes,  but  on  the  whole  I  am  convinced  it 
does  not  exist.  Perhaps  it  is  because  some  of  them  feel  an  inferiority 
attitude,  that  some  of  them  have  been  propagandized  and  some  of 
them  have  been  told  from  sources  they  consider  reliable  that  such 
things  exist.  That  is  the  only  way  I  can  explain  it  because  every  time 
they  apply  I  am  the  first  one  to  go  and  welcome  them  and  the  same 
thing  happens  with  the  other  officers  of  the  Los  Angeles  County  Med- 
ical Association. 

"Q.  Doctor,  would  you  say  it  was  just  as  easy  for  one  of  the  so- 
called  minority  groups  to  gain  admittance  to  medical  schools  as 
Americans  ? 

"A.  May  I  answer  that  in  this  way,  Senator?  We  have  in  this 
country  a  large  percentage  of  boys  that  want  to  study  medicine. 
Frankly,  I  don't  think  that  we  have  enough  medical  facilities  avail- 
able for  those  that  want  to  study  medicine.  Kemember,  the  day  of 
philanthropy  is  gone.  Taxation  is  so  onerous  that  nobody  has  any 
money  except  to  pay  taxes  and  perhaps  to  live.  Private  medical  schools, 
unless  some  relief  is  given  to  them,  are  on  the  way  out  and  only  state 
institutions  will  be  the  ones  that  will  exist.  Suppose  we  have  in  the 
United  States  30,000  individuals  who  want  to  study  medicine,  and 
there  are  two  colored  medical  schools  in  the  United  States,  and  out  of 
the  30,000  we  have  say  5,000  or  6,000  of  them  that  are  class  A  students, 
students  that  are  either  Phi  Beta  Kappa  or  its  equivalent.  It  is  only 
just  for  those  medical  schools  to  pick  the  men  that  have  the  best 
marks.  Say  the  percentage  there  of  Latin-Americans  may  be  only  100 
and  maybe  only  one  or  two  of  those  are  class  A,  and  the  same  thing 
with  the  colored  doctors;  for  example,  my  medical  school  in  the  east, 
Jefferson,  is  the  second  largest  in  the  United  States.  I  have  been  con- 
tacted many  times  regarding  men  that  have  applied  from  the  west 
coast,  especially  California.  And  it  was  my  duty  to  not  only  see  as 
to  the  moral  fitness  and  capabilities  of  the  student,  but  to  contact  the 
medical  school  and  see  about  his  grades.  I  had  to  do  so  as  a  double 
check  and  I  know  that  Jefferson  every  year  gets  between  5,000  and 
6,000  applicants,  and  out  of  the  5,000  or  6,000  they  take  in  about  140 
to  150.  Some  years  160  to  170. 

"Q.  It  would  be  based  upon  their  character,  grades,  and  so  on,  and 
nothing  as  to  their  race,  color  or  creed? 

"A.  No,  sir,  not  that  I  know  of.  I  would  be  the  first  one  to  con- 
demn such  practice. 

"Chairman  Burns:  Thank  you  very  much,  Doctor. 

"A.  May  I  make  a  statement,  Senator? 

' '  Chairman  Burns :  Yes. 

"A.  I  can't  understand,  gentlemen,  and  I  say  it  with  all  sincerity 
without  any  secret  evasion  in  my  mind  whatever,  why,  in  a  country 


104  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN  CALIFORNIA 

like  ours,  the  greatest  country  on  earth  and  this  is  not  a  flag  waving 
speech,  anyone  who  has  lived  in  the  United  States,  that  believes  in  the 
traditions,  that  has  inherited  some  of  the  direct  patrimony  and  acquired 
the  rights  and  privileges  and  at  the  same  time  the  bounties  of  this 
country,  can  believe  that  we  can  substitute  something  for  Americanism. 
How  can  they  for  one  minute  try  to  substitute  something  that  is  inimi- 
cal to  the  dignity  of  a  man  or  a  woman,  something  that  we  know  is 
atheistic  and,  if  a  man  has  any  intelligence  or  a  woman,  he  must  believe 
in  a  Supreme  Being?  How  could  anyone  who  calls  himself  an  American 
believe  in  something  like  that?  Unless  we  have  an  aroused  citizenry, 
unless  we  tell  the  people  of  the  United  States  what  it  is  all  about,  we 
cannot  hope  to  stem  the  tide  of  Communism.  In  1950,  members  of 
the  association  made  over  140  speeches  in  the  County  of  Los  Angeles 
and  other  counties  nearby,  and  our  theme  was  we  did  not  want 
socialized  medicine.  Remember  what  Karl  Marx  said,  that  there 
must  be  special  attention  paid  to  the  education  of  professionals  enter- 
ing the  party.  And  remember  what  Kanin  said,  that,  'the  truth  is 
always  there.  Man  has  not  lost  it.  He  has  lost  himself.'  As  for  me, 
gentlemen,  I  am  happy  to  take  a  loyalty  oath  at  any  time.  I  can  only 
say  I  wish  every  American  had  the  opportunity  to  visit  other  countries 
like  I  have  and  see  what  dictatorship  does  and  see  the  barbaric  atti- 
tude of  those  who  want  to  supplant  Americanism.  Thank  you, 
gentlemen. 

TESTIMONY  OF  DR.  CHESTER  L.  ROBERTS,  M.D. 

' '  Chairman  Burns :  Will  you  state  your  full  name  and  address, 
please  ? 

"The  Witness:  My  name  is  Chester  L.  Roberts;  I  am  a  doctor  of 
medicine.  My  office  address  is  606  North  Brand  Boulevard  in  Glendale, 
California.  My  home  address  is  2231  Hollister  Terrace  in  Glendale. 

"Q.  (By  Mr.  Combs)  :  Are  you  a  member  of  the  Los  Angeles  County 
Medical  Association? 

"A.  I  am. 

"Q.  You  have  been  a  member  of  that  association  for  about  how 
long? 

"A.  Since  1941. 

"Q.  As  a  matter  of  fact,  you  were  in  charge  of  the  Glendale  branch 
of  the  association,  were  you  not,  at  one  time? 

"A.  During  1950  and  1951,  I  was  secretary-treasurer  of  the  Glen- 
dale branch,  and  during  1952,  I  was  president  of  the  Glendale  branch. 

"Q.  Have  you  ever  done  any  work  as  a  consultant  to  the  Glendale 
Police  Department? 

' '  A.  Yes,  sir. 

' '  Q.  For  about  how  long  ? 

' '  A.  For  about  eight  or  nine  years. 


UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN  CALIFORNIA  105 

"  Q.  Were  you  here  this  morning  ? 

"A.  Yes,  sir. 

1 '  Q.  Have  you  heard  all  the  witnesses  who  preceded  you  ? 

"A.  Yes,  sir. 

"Q.  Have  you  ever  been  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party  or  a 
member  of  the  Communist  Political  Association  ? 

"A.  No,  sir. 

' '  Q.  You  never  have  been  ? 

"A.  No,  sir. 

"Q.  Doctor,  did  you  become  aware  as  the  other  witnesses  testified 
they  became  aware  of  a  threat  of  infiltration  by  Communists  in  the 
Los  Angeles  County  Medical  Association? 

"A.  Yes,  I  did. 

' '  Q.  When  did  you  first  become  aware  of  that  threat  ? 

"A.  About  three  years  ago. 

"Q.  Would  you  mind  describing  for  the  committee  in  general  terms 
how  that  condition  came  about  ? 

"A.  For  a  good  many  years  I  had  been  a  very  close  personal  friend 
of  Dr.  Alsberge  and  I  had  known  of  his  activities  in  exposing  Commu- 
nists in  the  profession  of  medicine  and  I  have  gone  to  meetings  as  an 
observer  at  his  request  to  help  him  in  any  way  I  could.  I  felt  the  least 
I  could  do  was  to  assist  him  in  any  way  that  I  could  with  a  problem  that 
I  felt  personally  was  my  fight  as  well  as  his  and  every  other  doctor  in 
the  profession. 

"  Q.  Dr.  Alsberge 's  office  is  in  Glendale  also,  is  it  not  ? 

' '  A.  Yes,  sir. 

' '  Q.  Did  you  at  his  request  attend  any  meetings  ? 

"A.  Yes,  I  did. 

"  Q.  Which  was  the  first  one  that  you  attended  ? 

' '  A.  The  first  one  was  at  Larchmont  Hall. 

' '  Q.  Where  is  that  located  ? 

"A.  118  North  Larchmont  in  Los  Angeles,  on  February  25,  1952. 

' '  Q.  What  was  the  nature  of  the  meeting  ? 

"A.  The  meeting  was  devoted  primarily  to  talks  by  Dr.  Pennes,  Dr. 
Abowitz  and  Dr.  Lippman  who  had  been  dropped  from  the  staff  of  the 
Cedars  of  Lebanon  Hospital. 

' '  Q.  What  was  the  tenor  of  their  remarks  ? 

' '  A.  They  were,  of  course,  very  much  upset.  They  thought  they  were 
being  discriminated  against  and  were  warning  the  entire  audience  of 
somewhere  between  500  and  600  that  these  things  having  started  in 
Poland,  the  same  situation  was  beginning  to  take  place  in  this  Country 
and  that  something  had  to  be  done  about  it  right  away. 

' '  Q.  Were  there  other  speakers  ? 


106  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

"A.  Yes,  there  were  several.  Stella  Rugetti  was  chairman;  Sylvia 
Miller  was  co-chairman  and  they  both  spoke  brieflly. 

' '  Q.  Along  the  same  lines  ? 

"A.  Yes,  indeed.  Reverend  Turpeau,  a  negro  Methodist  minister, 
also  spoke. 

"  Q.  Along  the  same  line  ? 

"A.  Yes. 

1 '  Q.  Was  that  an  evening  meeting  ? 

1 1  A.  Yes,  it  was. 

"Q.  And  commenced  about  7  o'clock  in  the  evening,  did  it? 

"A.  Either  7  or  8,  I  don't  recall. 

' '  Q.  And  continued  for  about  how  long  ? 

1 '  A.  Oh,  two  hours — or  two  and  a  half  hours,  I  believe. 

"Q.  In  referring  to  the  revolution  in  Poland,  was  anything  said 
about  the  revolution  in  the  United  States  ? 

"A.  From  notes  that  the  other  doctor  and  I  made  at  the  time,  and 
our  mutual  perusal  of  them  afterwards 

' '  Q.  Do  you  have  them  in  front  of  you  ? 

"A.  Yes.  Dr.  Pennes  first  addressed  the  meeting  and  traced  the 
persecution  of  famous  men  through  history,  Socrates,  Galileo,  and  so 
forth,  stating  their  names  were  remembered  yet  those  of  their  perse- 
cutors were  forgotten.  And  that  the  same  would  be  true  in  the  case  of 
the  three  doctors  from  Cedars;  that  this  action  of  Cedars  was  a  con- 
tinuation of  the  action  begun  years  ago.  Dr.  Pennes  stated  that  three 
years  ago  a  meeting  of  a  group  of  physicians  against  the  Burns  bill 
were  disrupted  by  a  Red-baiting  attack  by  an  emissary  of  the  medical 
association;  that  following  this,  these  reactionary  physicians,  with  the 
help  of  a  vicious  smear  sheet,  Alert,  attacked  Drs.  Hittelman  and  Robin- 
son ;  that,  in  spite  of  this  vicious  attack,  Drs.  Hittelman  and  Robinson 
received  a  good  vote  in  the  association  elections.  Then  Dr.  Pennes  stated 
that  the  attack  was  being  carried  on  by  the  Lay  Board  instituted  by  the 
same  vicious  smear  artists.  Dr.  Pennes  also  declared  that  the  only  basis 
of  his  removal  from  the  staff  was  the  mention  of  his  name  at  the  un- 
American  committee  hearing. 

' '  Q.  Did  he  use  that  term  '  un-American  committee  ? ' 

"  A.  I  believe  he  did. 

"Q.  Referring  to  the  House  Committee  on  Un-American  Activities? 

' '  A.  Yes.  Dr.  Abowitz  was  asked  if  he  had  attended  a  meeting  of  the 
Arts,  Sciences  and  Professions  Council  at  the  home  of  Dr.  Alexander 
Pennes,  that  caused  his  dismissal  from  St.  Joseph's  Hospital,  where  he 
had  been  considered  the  most  important  doctor  on  the  staff  and  subse- 
quently his  dismissal  from  Cedars;  that  following  this,  he  went  to  see 
Mr.  Hahn  at  the  bank  and  was  told  that  the  board  could  discharge  a 


UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN  CALIFORNIA  107 

doctor  if  they  didn't  like  the  way  he  combed  his  hair.  It  was  further 
stated  that  the  three  doctors,  Drs.  Pennes,  Abowitz  and  Lippman,  were 
told,  so  he  said,  that  they  had  the  right  to  appeal  to  the  Los  Angeles 
County  Medical  Association  and  to  the  State  Association  and  finally 
to  the  American  Medical  Association;  that,  however,  the  three  doctors, 
stated.  Dr.  Pennes,  had  information  that  the  Lay  Board  had  already 
talked  with  the  medical  association  and  the  association  had  committed 
itself  to  upholding  the  Lay  Board  and,  therefore,  an  appeal  would  be 
useless.  Dr.  Pennes  stated  that  the  medical  staff  was  shocked  and  dis- 
mayed by  the  actions  of  the  Lay  Board,  but,  however,  they  were  pres- 
sured into  supporting  the  board.  An  example  of  pressure  that  he  gave 
us  was,  he  said  one  doctor,  who  had  been  a  staff  member  for  14  years, 
signed  a  letter  on  behalf  of  the  three  doctors  and  since  then,  for  the 
three  weeks  preceding  this  meeting,  he  had  been  unable  to  get  his  pa- 
tients committed  to  the  hospital.  Dr.  Pennes  stated  that  letters  to  the 
Lay  Board  were  ignored  and  that  a  petition,  signed  by  at  least  10 
prominent  staff  members,  would  be  required  but  that  it  would  be  im- 
possible to  secure,  due  to  reprisals.  His  closing  statement  was,  '  Cedars 
belongs  to  you.  It  is  a  community  hospital  and  doesn't  belong  to  the 
Lay  Board. ' 

"Q.  Were  there  other  speakers? 

"A.  Yes.  Dr.  Murray  Abowitz  spoke  next.  He  was  introduced  as  a 
member  of  Cedars'  staff  for  14  years  and  as  chairman  of  the  ASP  (Arts, 
Sciences  and  Professions  Council)  Medical  Division.  Dr.  Abowitz  claimed 
that  the  spontaneous  wave  of  protests  had  so  swamped  the  Cedars  switch- 
board that  extra  help  was  required  to  handle  all  the  calls  and  mail; 
that  since  then,  he  said,  it  was  impossible  to  talk  to  Weisberger  unless 
first  cleared  by  the  FBI. 

"Q.  Weisberger  was  the  medical  director  at  the  Cedars  of  Lebanon 
Hospital  or  at  least  an  official  there,  was  he  ? 

"A.  Yes,  he  was.  He  said  that  letters  of  sympathy  had  been  received 
from  Dr.  Goodman  of  the  University  of  Utah  School  of  Pharmacy,  Dr. 
Alan  Butler  of  Harvard  Department  of  Pediatrics  and  Ernest  Boas, 
head  of  the  Physicians  Forum.  He  further  said  that  the  Los  Angeles 
Board  of  Rabbis  were  given  the  facts  of  the  case  and  expressed  sym- 
pathy, yet,  when  they  attempted  to  see  Ben  Meyer,  they  were  refused 
admittance,  according  to  Dr.  Abowitz.  Dr.  Abowitz  further  stated,  'the 
medical  staff,  with  few  exceptions,  are  behind  us.  Pressure  is  keeping 
them  from  actively  supporting  us.  A  number  of  contributors  to  the 
Cedars  Research  Fund  have  withdrawn  their  contributions  until  we  are 
reinstated.  Expectant  mothers  are  cancelling  their  hospital  reservations 
at  Cedars  in  protest.'  He  also  stated  that  200  of  Cedars'  staff  members 
held  a  meeting  at  the  Beverly  Wilshire  Hotel  recently  and,  almost  with- 
out exception,  they  deplored  conditions  at  Cedars  and  promised  to  write 


108  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

letters.  Then  his  closing  statements  were,  'this  must  be  a  group  fight. 
Focal  point  of  rebellion  against  Cedars  is  a  rebellion  against  the  human 
incineration  of  Germany,  the  McCarthyites  and  the  Tenneys.'  He  stated 
that,  'our  government  has  brought  the  infamous  Nazi,  Dr.  Schreiber, 
over  here  from  Germany  and  placed  him  in  charge  of  research  in  an 
air  force  hospital.  He  was  responsible  for  the  mass  murder  of  thousands 
of  Jews,  yet  he  is  honored  by  our  government  and  we  three  are  dis- 
missed from  Cedars. '  He  further  stated,  '  Fifteen  people  in  Los  Angeles 
are  being  prosecuted  for  the  books  they  read  and  what  they  think.  Things 
have  gone  far  enough.' 

' '  Q.  Did  he  point  out  that  he  had  been  identified  by  witnesses  under 
oath  as  a  Communist  Party  member? 

"A.  No. 

"Q.  He  didn't  make  that  statement? 

"A.  No. 

' '  Q.  Were  there  other  speakers  ? 

"A.  The  third  doctor,  who  was  dismissed  from  the  Cedars  of  Leba- 
non Hospital,  was  Dr.  Richard  Lippman,  who  was  interested  as  a 
two-times  winner  of  the  Guggenheim  Fellowship,  and  it  was  also 
announced  that  on  that  day  he  received  a  two-year  research  grant  from 
the  National  Health  Foundation.  Dr.  Lippman  was  a  very  vituperative 
speaker.  He  said  that  the  loyalty  boards,  oaths  and  un-American  com- 
mittees had  affected  every  field  of  science.  He  said,  'we  have  drifted 
into  a  position  the  same  as  science  in  Germany  under  Hitler.  Because 
U.  C.  L.  A.  has  a  loyalty  check  the  medical  school  is  unable  to  attract 
any  outstanding  men  for  their  staff.  Dr.  White  was  cleared  by  the 
FBI  after  a  long  delay  but  the  board  of  regents  felt  that  the  delay  in 
clearance  was  sufficient  reason  to  drop  his  name  from  the  roster.  Many 
years  ago,  Dr.  White  registered,  only  once,  as  an  I.  P.  P.'  He  stated 
that  continued  un-American  hearings  and  the  persecution  by  Cedars 
is  a  studied  program  to  insure  the  passage  of  the  loyalty  oath  bill  by 
the  1953  Legislature.  'Why  did  they  pick  we  three  for  persecution? 
We  were  especially  vulnerable  because,  one,  Dr.  Abowitz  was  questioned 
by  the  Un-American  Committee ;  two,  Dr.  Pennes  was  mentioned  before 
the  committee  as  having  permitted  a  meeting  to  be  held  in  his  home ; 
three,  and  I  was  called  to  examine  a  Communist,  Bernadette  Doyle, 
in  Los  Angeles  County  Jail.  Is  it  a  crime  to  examine  a  Communist? 
A  doctor  is  not  supposed  to  look  into  the  political  or  religious  beliefs 
of  his  patients.  Dr.  Abowitz  has  been  very  active  in  the  fight  for  health 
insurance.  We  have  all  spoken  for  peace.  We  all  had  a  part  in  the 
preparation  of  a  statistical  survey  on  racial  discrimination  in  Los 
Angeles  hospitals.  There  are  the  reasons  we  have  been  attacked.  If 
they  succed  in  keeping  us  out  of  Cedars,  you  will  be  under  attack 
next.'  Then  he  sat  down  amid  a  roar  of  applause. 


UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  109 

"Q.  Did  anyone  else  speak,  Doctor? 

"A.  Sylvia  Miller  got  up  and  announced  that  Dr.  Linus  Pauling 
was  not  able  to  be  present  due  to  illness,  but  he  sent  a  message  express- 
ing hope  for  victory  in  this  fight.  Then  Reverend  Turpeau  stated  that 
with  the  help  of  the  Arts,  Sciences  and  Professions  booklet,  Yours  for  a 
Genuine  Brotherhood,  he  had  been  able  to  do  away  with  all  racial  dis- 
crimination in  the  local  Methodist  Hospital;  that,  in  appreciation  for 
this  help,  he  and  his  entire  congregation  would  support  the  three 
doctors  in  their  fight  against  Cedars. 

"Mr.  Combs:  The  other  two  doctors  have  already  been  identified. 
At  this  point  I  wish  to  make  it  clear  for  our  record  that  Dr.  Alexander 
Pennes  was  identified  as  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party  of  Los 
Angeles  County  before  the  House  Committee  on  Un-American  Activities 
in  October,  1952,  on  page  4120  of  the  transcript,  and  at  that  point  he 
took  refuge  by  invoking  the  Fifth  Amendment  to  the  Constitution  of 
the  United  States. 

"Q.  Does  that  complete  your  notes  of  the  Larchmont  Hall  Meeting? 

"A.  Except  I  have  this  booklet  that  was  distributed. 

"Q.  That  was  distributed  at  the  meeting? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Mr.  Combs:  To  identify  it,  Mr.  Chairman  and  Members  of  the 
Committee,  it  is  a  folder  entitled,  Cedars  Shame,  and  sets  forth  some 
material  about  Drs.  Abowitz,  Lippman  and  Pennes  and  was  issued 
by  the  Committee  for  Medical  Freedom,  3757  Wilshire  Boulevard,  Los 
Angeles,  California.  May  we  introduce  this  as  an  exhibit  ?  We  offer  it  as 
an  exhibit  to  be  marked  the  next  exhibit  in  order. 

"Chairman  Burns:  It  will  be  admitted  as  Exhibit  No.  7. 

"Q.  (By  Mr.  Combs)  :  Did  you  also  attend  a  meeting  which  was  in 
the  nature  of  a  testimonial  dinner  for  the  Reverend  Stephen  Fritch- 
man? 

"A.  Yes,  I  did. 

"Q.  What  was  the  date  of  that  meeting? 

"A.  April  10th,  1954. 

"Q.  Did  you  go  alone  or  with  someone  else? 

"A.  I  went  with  Dr.  Marden  Alsberge  at  his  request  as  an  observer. 

"Q.  And  did  you  also  take  notes  during  or  immediately  after 
attending  that  meeting? 

"A.  Yes,  I  did. 

"Q.  Where  was  it  held? 

"A.  It  was  held  at  the  Park  Manor,  607  Southwestern,  Los  Angeles. 

"Q.  What  time  did  you  and  Dr.  Alsberge  go  to  the  meeting,  about? 

"A.  Shortly  before  7  p.m. 

"Q.  And  you  left  at  when? 

"A.  It  was  pretty  late,  I  guess  11  or  11.30. 


110  UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

"Q.  About  how  many  people  were  present? 

"A.  I  should  judge  roughly  a  thousand. 

"  Q.  It  was  a  very  large  meeting  ? 

"A.  Yes,  indeed. 

' '  Q.  Men  and  women  both  ? 

"A.  Yes,  sir. 

"Q.  Was  it  a  dinner  meeting? 

"A.  Yes,  it  was. 

"Q.  And  were  you  admitted  by  ticket? 

"A.  Yes,  we  were. 

"Q.  Do  you  have  a  copy  of,  or  a  replica  of  the  ticket  with  you? 

"A.  Yes,  I  do. 

"Q.  May  I  see  it,  please? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  I  notice  that  on  this  ticket  it  reads  as  follows:  'Stephen  H. 
Fritchman  Testimonal  Dinner.  Saturday,  April  10,  1954,  7  p.m.  Park 
Manor,  607  South  Western,  Los  Angeles,  California.  Sponsor:  Com- 
munity Medical  Foundation. '  Do  you  know  what  that  is  ? 

"A.  The  Community  Medical  Foundation,  I  understand,  is  an  organ- 
ization which  sponsors  the  Community  Medical  Center. 

"Q.  And  what  is  the  Community  Medical  Center? 

"A.  It  is  a  medical  center  where  care  is  given  to  people  in  that  area. 

"Q.  Is  it  in  the  nature  of  a  clinic? 

"A.  Yes,  I  have  some  data  on  that. 

"Q.  It  says  (the  ticket)  'Donation,  $5 — no  collection,'  and  on  this 
ticket  is  a  number.  This  one  happens  to  be  No.  1553.  Just  what  were 
the  mechanics  by  which  you  gained  admission  to  the  meeting  ? 

"A.  The  tickets  were  obtained  and,  when  we  went  to  the  door,  our 
tickets  were  checked  by  number  and  our  names  were  asked,  and  the 
name  was  opposite  the  number  of  the  ticket,  so  there  could  be  no  slip-up, 
and  the  tickets  were  not  just  handed  in.  They  were  stopped  and  checked 
off  and  our  names  were  requested. 

"Q.  In  other  words,  as  I  understand  it,  when  you  would  walk  up 
with  a  ticket  such  as  this,  you  were  stopped  at  the  door  and  you  pre- 
sented your  ticket? 

"A.  Yes,  they  took  it. 

"Q.  And  retained  the  same? 

"A.  Yes,  sir. 

"Q.  And  then  you  were  asked  your  name  and,  when  you  gave  your 
name,  they  had  a  master  sheet  on  which  they  checked  your  name  and 
made  sure  that  the  proper  number  was  opposite  the  name,  is  that  it  ? 

"A.  That  is  true. 

"Q.  And  that  is  the  mechanics  by  which  you  were  admitted? 


UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  111 

"A.  Yes,  sir. 

"Q.  You  and  Dr.  Alsberge  went  in  together,  did  you? 

"A.  Yes,  sir,  we  did. 

"Q.  And  sat  together  during  the  entire  evening? 

"A.  Yes,  sir. 

"Q.  May  we  introduce  this  as  an  exhibit? 

"A.  Yes,  sir. 

"Mr.  Combs:  I  offer  this  as  Exhibit  No.  8. 

"Chairman  Burns:  It  will  be  admitted  as  Exhibit  No.  8. 

"Q.  (By  Mr.  Combs)  :  Referring  to  your  notes,  doctor,  would  you 
mind  telling  us  what  took  place  at  that  meeting? 

"A.  The  tenor  of  the  meeting  was  eulogies  of  Mr.  Fritchman. 

"Q.  He  is  the  pastor  of  the  First  Unitarian  Church  in  Los  Angeles, 
is  he  not? 

"A.  Yes,  sir,  and  discussing  the  Community  Medical  Center.  The 
dinner  was  sponsored  by  the  Community  Medical  Center.  They  intro- 
duced several  people  from  the  head  table.  There  were  a  lot  of  introduc- 
tions and  statements,  and  so  on.  Mrs.  Rose  Boyd,  who  was  seated  at 
the  head  table,  was  introduced  as  the  coordinator  of  the  dinner  which 
was  given  by  the  Community  Medical  Center. 

"Q.  Do  you  know  anything  about  Rose  Boyd,  who  she  is? 

"  A.  I  did  not  until  I  went  to  the  meeting. 

"Q.  Continue,  please. 

"A.  As  I  say,  she  was  introduced  as  the  coordinator  of  the  dinner 
which  was  given  by  the  Community  Medical  Center  honoring  Mr. 
Fritchman  for  his  services  as  a  member  of  the  board  of  the  Community 
Medical  Foundation,  which,  incidentally,  runs  the  Community  Medical 
Center.  There  were  statements  by  many  men  a  few  of  which  I  have 
notes  on.  Rabbi  Winaker,  from  either  Santa  Monica  or  Pacific  Pali- 
sades, gave  a  very  vituperative  talk,  eulogizing  Mr.  Fritchman  and 
criticizing  our  government  in  many  ways.  One  of  the  statements  that 
aroused  a  lot  of  laughter  was  when  he  said,  'In  America  today  a  per- 
son is  either  being  roasted  by  inquisitors  or  frozen  out  of  jobs.'  Then 
Rev.  G.  L.  Hayes  advocated  Mr.  Fritchman  as  a  suitable  man  for 
nomination  for  President  of  the  United  States,  again  amid  deafening 
applause.  Mr.  Stephen  Fritchman,  after  replying  to  the  eulogies,  stated 
that  he  hoped  that  if  a  member  of  the  FBI  was  present  in  the  audience, 
that  he  had  at  least  paid  for  his  dinner. 

"Q.  Did  that  provoke  gaiety  and  merriment  also? 

"A.  Yes,  indeed.  Another  quote  we  have  here  by  Mr.  Fritchman  is 
that  he  hoped  to  see  our  taxes  spent  for  government-financed  hospitals 
for  all  people  instead  of  hydrogen  bomb  hysteria.  The  tenor  of  the 
evening  regarding  the  remarks  by  many,  many  speakers,  little  short 


112  UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES   IN   CALIFORNIA 

talks,  was  that  there  were  disparaging  remarks  regarding  the  FBI  and 
the  "witch-hunt"  committees,  the  manner  in  which  our  government 
is  run  and  the  judgment  shown  in  the  administration  of  government 
functions.  For  about  an  hour,  roughly,  Rose  Boyd  alternating  with 
Herman  Waldman  read  congratulatory  messages,  and  so  forth,  one 
would  read  one  then  the  other  would  read  another  one  as  a  dialogue. 
One  was  from  San  Francisco ;  one  of  them  was  from  Dr.  Richard  E. 
Weinerman  from  Pasadena,  in  appreciation,  and  congratulations  from 
Linus  Pauling.  And  there  were  congratulatory  messages  from  Reuben 
Burrough,  Cedric  Belfrage,  W.  C.  DuBois  and  Rockwell  Kent;  and 
also  a  message  from  the  president  of  Local  6  of  the  International  Long- 
shoremens  Union  of  San  Francisco. 

"Q.  May  I  interrupt  you  there?  Rockwell  Kent,  of  course,  is  a  very 
noted  artist  and  president  of  an  organization  which  has  been  legally 
defined  as  a  Communist  front,  a  very,  very  big  one,  the  International 
Workers  Order,  which  will  identify  Rockwell  Kent,  who  is  often  con- 
fused with  Norman  Rockwell,  the  man  who  makes  the  covers  for  the 
Saturday  Evening  Post. 

"A.  Among  the  introductions  and  speakers,  Kenneth  Hartford  was 
introduced  as  an  officer — I  don't  remember  whether  it  was  business 
director  or  executive  officer  of  the  Community  Medical  Center — and 
he  outlined  the  operations  of  the  center  and  stated  that  there  were 
18,000  patient  visits  per  year.  Also  that  the  election  of  officers  would 
be  held  at  the  next  membership  meeting.  Dr.  Milton  Z.  London  who, 
incidentally,  was  seated  at  the  head  table,  was  introduced  as  the  vice 
president  of  the  board  of  the  Community  Medical  Foundation  and  as 
chief  of  staff  of  the  Community  Medical  Center.  Dr.  P.  Price  Cobbs 
was  introduced  as  a  member  of  the  board  of  the  Community  Medical 
Foundation,  and  Rose  Rosenburg  spoke.  She  praised  Mr.  Fritchman 
and  his  great  help  to  all  liberal  organizations.  She  praised  him  specifi- 
cally for  backing  the  Community  Medical  Foundation  because  it 
gave  health  care  to  foreign  born  and  others ;  also  on  his  stand  in  behalf 
of  some  of  those  under  threat  of  deportation. 

' '  Q.  Was  that  the  extent  of  the  notes  that  you  took  ? 

"A.  Except  on  some  of  the  people  who  were  introduced  at  the  table 
or  identified  for  me. 

' '  Q.  Will  you  tell  me  who  they  are,  please  ? 

"A.  These  people  were  either  introduced  to  me  or  identified  for  me 
at  the  meeting.  Dr.  and  Mrs.  Murray  Abowitz,  Mrs.  Rose  Wald- 
man, who,  incidentally,  was  introduced  to  me,  Leah  London  and  Mil- 
ton London,  Ben  Margolis,  Louis  Gardner,  Dr.  Leo  Bigelman,  P.  Price 
Cobbs,  Dr.  Koppleman,  Dr.  Thomas  Perry,  Robert  Schmorlitz,  Adrian 
Scott,  Gale  Sondergaard  and  Herbert  Biberman,  and  on  the  last  one  I 


UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES  IN  CALIFORNIA  113 

have  on  my  list  is  Dr.  Marvin  Sure,  who  was  an  optometrist  in  my 
home  town  of  Glendale. 

"Q.  Do  you  know  him  personally? 

"A.  I  know  who  he  is. 

"Q.  Doctor,  was  there  any  literature  or  material  of  a  printed  nature 
distributed  at  the  Fritchman  testimonial  dinner? 

"A.  Just  these  two  pamphlets  were  passed  out  to  us.  One  of  them 
was  handed  to  me. 

' '  Mr.  Combs :  The  first  one  the  doctor  has  handed  to  me  is  entitled, 
Teamwork  for  Health,  Consumer-Controlled  Through  the  Community 
Medical  Foundation,  a  Nonprofit  California  Corporation,  1236  South 
Lake  Street,  Los  Angeles.  I  ask  that  it  be  introduced,  Mr.  Chairman, 
as  Exhibit  No.  9. 

' '  Chairman  Burns :  It  will  be  so  received. 

"Mr.  Combs:  And  the  next  document  which  the  witness  has  handed 
me  is  a  folder  on  green  paper  entitled  Comumnity  Medical  Foundation, 
1236  South  Lake  Street,  Los  Angeles  6,  California,  and  when  unfolded, 
on  the  inside,  it  says,  'For  you  and  your  family:  a  comprehensive 
medical-surgical  hospital  plan. ' 

"I  ask  that  this  be  introduced  in  evidence  as  Exhibit  No.  10. 

"Chairman  Burns:  It  will  be  so  admitted. 

"Q.   (By  Mr.  Combs)  :  Do  you  have  anything  else  to  add,  Doctor? 

"A.  No,  sir. 

"Q.  Then  let  me  ask  you  this  question,  or  did  I  ask  ydu  whether  or 
not  you  have  ever  been  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party? 

"A.  Yes,  you  did. 

"Q.  And  your  answer  was  in  the  negative? 

"A.  Yes,  sir,  in  the  negative. 

"Q.  What  was  your  conclusion  as  to  the  character  of  those  two  meet- 
ings you  attended  and  concerning  which  you  took  notes  which  you 
have  read  into  the  record? 

"A.  Frankly,  I  was  shocked.  I  had  understood  from  Dr.  Alsberge 
in  the  years  that  I  had  known  him  that  there  had  been  some  Com- 
munist education  in  the  Medical  Association,  but  I  had  never  realized 
that  it  could  be  possible  in  this  country,  that  people  could  fall  so  far 
away  from  Americanism  and  get  so  much  support  from  large  groups 
of  people,  and  it  was  the  surprise  of  my  life. 

"Q.  You  were  shocked  because  of  what  you  saw  and  heard  at  these 
two  meetings? 

"A.  Yes,  indeed. 

"Q.  Did  you  form  any  conclusion  as  to  whether  they  were  or  were 
not  Communist-dominated  or  sympathetic  toward  Communism? 

"A.  There  was  no  question  about  that  in  my  mind. 


114  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

"Q.  And  that  was  true  as  to  each  of  the  meetings? 

"A.  Yes,  indeed. 

"Mr.  Combs:  I  believe  that  is  all,  Mr.  Chairman. 

"Q.  (By  Chairman  Burns)  :  Do  you  know,  Doctor,  whether  or  not 
Dr.  Abowitz  was  reinstated  to  the  Cedars  of  Lebanon  staff? 

"A.  I  don't  know. 

"Q.  (By  Senator  Thompson)  :  Doctor,  you  said  there  were  a  thou- 
sand people  at  this  last  meeting,  or  approximately  that? 

"A.  Yes,  sir. 

"Q.  "Were  the  people  that  attended  all  along  the  same  lines  or  were 
a  good  many  of  them  there  because  of  some  influence? 

"A.  That  I  do  not  know.  I  know  they  were  very  sympathetic  and 
that  the  jibes  against  the  government  and  against  the  FBI  and  against 
the  way  things  are  done  in  this  country  as  a  whole  were  very  well 
supported  by  their  applause. 

"Chairman  Burns:  Thank  you  very  much  for  your  kind  assistance 
and  help. 

TESTIMONY  OF  DR.  BEN  FREES,  M.D. 

Q.   (By  Mr.  Combs)  :  Your  address,  Doctor? 
A.  629  South  Westlake,  Los  Angeles. 

Q.  Dr.  Frees,  you  are  a  physician  and  a  surgeon,  are  you  not? 
;A.  Yes,  sir. 

;Q.  And  a  member  of  the  Los  Angeles  County  Medical  Association? 
A.  Yes,  sir. 

Q.  How  long  have  you  been  affiliated  with  that  association? 
A.  Since  1916. 

Q.  Have  you  ever  held  any  offices  in  it? 
A.  Yes,  sir. 

Q.  Would  you  tell  us  what  they  were? 

A.  I  was  elected  president  of  the  Los  Angeles  County  Medical 
Association  in  1949.  I  was  elected  chairman  of  the  board  of  trustees 
in  1953.  I  was  re-elected  for  the  year  1954,  and  I  am  still  serving  as 
chairman  of  the  board  of  trustees. 

"Q.  How  many  members  comprise  the  board  of  trustees? 
"A.  Nine. 

"Q.  Would  you  describe  briefly  the  duties  of  the  board? 
"A.  The  Board  of  Trustees  of  the  Los  Angeles  County  Medical 
Association  have  full  charge  of  the  finances  of  the  association.  The 
ruling  bodies  of  the  county  medical  association  consist  of  a  board  of 
trustees  of  nine  and  a  council  of  some  40.  The  council  have  to  do  with 
public  relations  and  policy,  but  they  have  nothing  to  do  with  the  run- 
ning of  the  business  end  of  the  Los  Angeles  County  Medical  Associa- 
tion; that  is  entirely  in  the  hands  of  the  board  of  trustees. 


UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN  CALIFORNIA  115 

"Q.  Dr.  Frees,  you  are  aware  generally,  are  you  not,  of  the  fact 
that  this  committee  received  a  letter  signed  by  the  officers  of  the  asso- 
ciation in  1953  and  a  similar  letter  in  1954,  requesting  this  committee 
to  conduct  an  investigation  concerning  the  alleged  Communist  infiltra- 
tion of  the  medical  profession  in  Los  Angeles  County  ? 

"A.  Yes,  sir. 

"Q.  Are  you  aware  of  the  general  background  existing  within  the 
association  which  led  to  the  writing  of  those  letters? 

"A.  Yes,  I  am. 

"Q.  Would  you  tell  us  about  that,  please? 

"A.  About  1949,  the  year  of  my  presidency,  there  was  a  question 
that  arose  in  all  professional  circles  of  the  loyalty  oath.  The  State  Medi- 
cal Society  was  contemplating  the  passage  of  some  sort  of  a  demand 
that  all  officers  serving  in  the  State  Medical  Association  should  take  a 
loyalty  oath. 

"The  Los  Angeles  County  Medical  Association  began  to  discuss  the 
same  subject,  so  that  in  1949  we  contemplated  legislation  to  pass  such 
a  rule  in  our  by-laws.  The  question  was  known  generally  by  the  member- 
ship, the  6,000  doctors,  and  it  was  being  discussed.  Along  about  May  of 
1949,  a  letter  came  into  circulation  and  it  was  called  to  my  attention  as 
president  that  a  meeting  was  to  be  held  by  a  committee — that  the  meet- 
ing was  in  the  Hollywood  Women 's  Club.  This  circular  letter  was  signed 
by  a  great  number  of  doctors,  many  of  whom  were  friends  of  mine,  and 
others  whom  I  did  not  know.  It  was  sponsored  under  a  committee  called 
the  Emergency  Medical  Committee  for  the  Defense  of  Professional 
Licensure.  Several  doctors  talked  to  me.  They  gave  me  the  impression 
that  this  was  a  movement  against  loyalty  oaths  and  that  the  group  was 
looked  upon  as  being  representative  of  the  leftist  element,  and  that  it 
was  the  feeling  that  I  should  go  to  this  meeting.  Therefore,  we  gathered 
a  group  of  the  top  men  who  had  held  office  in  the  Los  Angeles  County 
Medical  Association  and  we  attended  that  meeting. 

' '  First  of  all,  I  would  like  to  say  that  we  had  difficulty  in  finding  out 
where  the  meeting  was  to  be  held,  because  the  manager  of  the  women's 
club  called  by  telephone  and  said  that  the  board  of  directors  had  met 
and  that  they  were  going  to  refuse  this  meeting. 

"Q.  Did  she  give  any  reason? 

1 '  A.  Yes.  She  gave  the  reason  that  it  was  such  a  meeting  which  per- 
tained to  the  leftist  feelings  and  was  against  the  good  of  the  new 
Women's  Club  of  Hollywood.  Later  on,  we  received  a  telephone  call 
that  the  meeting  would  be  held,  that  they  had  signed  a  statement  and 
that  they  were  bound  by  the  signed  agreement  whereby  they  had  given 
the  hall.  So  I  did  attend  that  meeting.  I  went  with  a  number  of  others. 
That  is  the  first  meeting  of  any  sort  of  this  nature  that  I  have  ever 
attended.  I  certainly  had  my  eyes  opened. 


116  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

"Q.  Dr.  Frees,  during  your  attendance  at  the  meeting,  or  shortly 
thereafter,  did  you  make  any  notes  as  to  what  transpired  generally? 

"A.  Do  you  mean  of  the  meeting ? 

"Q.  Yes. 

"A.  No  specific  notes. 

"Q.  In  general  terms,  to  the  best  of  your  recollection,  can  you  give 
us  the  character  of  the  meeting  and  why  you  gathered  the  impressions 
you  did  concerning  it? 

' '  A.  The  character  was  all  sorts  of  propaganda  of  why  a  professional 
man  should  never  take  an  oath.  It  got  into  free  thought,  free  speech, 
free  everything.  Loyalty  to  our  country  was  certainly  displaced  by  a 
feeling  that  our  country  amounted  to  very  little.  One  could  not  sit  there 
and  hear  the  speeches  made  by  various  speakers  and  not  feel  that  your 
loyalty  to  your  country  was  something  that  had  gotten  to  be  a  very 
bitter  end  when  people  would  utter  the  kind  of  language  stated  there. 

"One  of  our  members  attempted  to  get  the  floor  and  speak,  but  had 
great  difficulty.  He  finally  did  vault  the  platform.  We  backed  him  up 
and  he  did  make  a  rebuttal  speech  to  the  group  there  that  night. 

"  Q.  Who  was  this  doctor  ? 

"A.  That  was  Marden  Alsberge. 

"Q.  Did  he  make  some  statements  refuting  the  remarks  of  the 
speakers  who  had  preceded  him  ? 

"A.  In  no  uncertain  terms  and  with  considerable  applause  by  the 
few  of  us  who  were  there. 

' '  Q.  About  how  many  people  attended  that  meeting  ? 

"A.  I  would  say  that  the  hall  was  about  half  filled. 

"  Q.  What  was  its  capacity  ? 

"A.  I  think  several  hundred. 

"Q.  Did  you  attend  any  other  meeting  of  a  similar  nature? 

"A.  No,  that  was  the  only  meeting  that  I  attended. 

"Q.  Did  your  experience  at  that  meeting  indicate  to  you  that  there 
was  some  sort  of  a  serious  problem  confronting  the  association? 

"A.  Very  much  so. 

"Q.  You  then  were  in  favor,  I  take  it,  of  the  invitation  extended  to 
the  committee  to  conduct  an  investigation  and  make  the  results  of  it 
available  to  the  association? 

"A.  Particularly  brought  about  by  the  fact  that  occurred  in  May, 
then  the  following  November  we  held  an  election  at  the  County  Medical 
Association  for  the  officers  for  the  ensuing  year,  1950.  From  the  floor 
there  were  nominated  two  men  whose  names  were  prominent  at  this 
meeting  that  I  attended.  Following  the  nomination  of  these  two  doctors 
to  hold  positions  of  councilmen  in  our  own  society,  literature  was 
mailed  to  all  of  the  members  of  the  association  asking  us  to  vote  for 
these  two  men.  In  this  group  of  names  sponsoring  these  two  candidates 


UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN  CALIFORNIA  117 

I  found  the  names  of  the  same  men,  many  of  whom  had  been  at  the 
meeting. 

' '  Q.  Which  indicated  to  you  a  pattern  of  infiltration  ? 

"A.  Which  indicated  to  me  that  it  was  much  more  serious  than  I 
had  anticipated. 

' '  Q.  What  was  the  result  of  that  threat  at  infiltration  ? 

"A.  After  the  votes  were  counted,  practically  20  percent  of  the  votes 
of  the  entire  organization  voted  for  these  two  men. 

"Q.  Did  that  serve  to  solidify  the  resistance  and  the  effort  to  ascer- 
tain the  seriousness  of  the  infiltration  ? 

"A.  It  was  then  felt  that  this  could  not  be  combatted  by  the  associ- 
ation itself  and  that  we  had  to  ask  for  help. 

"Q.  This  was  early  in  1950? 

"A.  This  election  was  early  in  1950,  that  is  correct. 

"Q.  Did  you  discuss  the  problem  with  other  members  of  the 
association  ? 

"A.  Yes,  sir. 

' '  Q.  Have  you  been  discussing  that  matter  since  the  time  you  first  at- 
tended the  meeting  ? 

"A.  Yes,  sir. 

"Q.  The  discussions  are  still  in  progress,  are  they? 

"A.  Still  in  progress. 

"Q.  Do  you  have  anything  else  to  add,  Doctor? 

"A.  I  don't  think  I  have. 

"Mr.  Combs :  That  is  all. 

' '  Chairman  Burns :  May  I  ask  you,  Doctor,  about  the  time  that  this 
meeting  was  held,  the  Emergency  Medical  Committee  for  the  Defense  of 
Professional  Licensure,  is  that  right? 

"A.  Prof essional  Licensure. 

"Q.  Was  that  about  the  time  we  were  having  legislation  presented  in 
the  Legislature  providing  for  loyalty  oaths  to  those  licensed  under  the 
Department  of  Professional  and  Vocational  Standards  ? 

"A.  Yes,  sir,  that  is  the  same  time. 

"Q.  The  leadership  at  the  meeting  were  in  protest  to  the  passage  of 
that  legislation  and  were  attempting  to  implement  some  opposition  to  it. 
Was  that  discussed  at  the  meeting  ? 

"A.  It  was. 

' '  Chairman  Burns :  Does  anyone  have  any  questions  ? 

' '  Mr.  Combs :  Yes,  sir.  Doctor  Frees,  let  me  ask  you  the  question  we 
have  asked  of  all  witnesses.  Are  you  now  or  have  you  ever  been  a  mem- 
ber of  the  Communist  Party  or  the  Communist  Political  Association? 

"A.  Emphatically,  no. 

' '  Mr.  Combs :  Thank  you,  sir. 

' '  Chairman  Burns :  Thank  you,  Doctor,  you  may  be  excused. 


118  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN  CALIFORNIA 

TESTIMONY  OF  DR.  NATHANIEL  BERCOVITZ,  M.D. 

"Q.   (By  Mr.  Combs)  :  Let  us  have  your  name  and  address,  please. 

"A.  Dr.  Nathaniel  Bercovitz,  536  Avenue  64,  Pasadena. 

"Q.  Dr.  Bercovitz,  you  are  a  physician  and  surgeon,  licensed  to  prac- 
tice your  professions  in  California  ? 

"A.  That  is  right. 

"Q.  Do  you  have  any  affiliation  with  any  medical  group  or  organiza- 
tions in  the  State  ? 

"A.  I  am  a  member  of  the  Los  Angeles  County  Medical  Association. 

"Q.  And  you  have  been  for  how  long? 

"A.  I  have  been  for  a  number  of  years. 

' '  Q.  Did  you  spend  any  time  in  the  Far  East  ? 

"A.  I  spent  a  number  of  years  in  China. 

"Q.  What  part  of  China? 

"A.  On  the  island  of  Hainan  in  South  China. 

' '  Q.  Would  you  set  dates  that  your  tenure  commenced  and  terminated  ? 

"A.  I  first  went  out  in  1915  and  was  officially  released  by  the  Com- 
munists in  May,  1953. 

"Q.  You  were  released  by  the  Communists  when? 

"A.  In  April,  1953. 

"Q.  Where  were  you  when  you  were  released? 

"A.  I  was  in  Hainan  at  that  time. 

"Q.  You  were  doing  work  as  a  medical  missionary? 

' '  A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  Under  the  auspices  of  what  organization? 

"A.  The  Presbyterian  Board  of  Foreign  Missions. 

"Q.  Would  you  briefly  describe  what  your  duties  were  in  Hainan, 
just  what  you  did? 

"A.  I  was  superintendent  of  the  American  Presbyterian  Hospital  in 
the  city  of  Hoi  How  on  the  island  of  Hainan.  This  is  a  180-bed  hospital 
which  is  conducted  by  the  Presbyterial  Mission.  I  had  been  superin- 
tendent of  that  hospital  for  a  great  many  years.  I  was  also  chief  of 
surgery  there. 

' '  Q.  During  the  period  of  your  residence  on  the  island  of  Hainan  did 
you  notice  any  evidence  of  Communist  indoctrination  on  the  part  of  the 
residents  of  that  island  ?  Take  it  from  the  time  you  first  went  there,  and 
if  you  will  trace  for  us  any  developing  incidents  of  obvious  Communist 
indoctrination  or  affiliation  that  came  to  your  attention? 

"A.  When  I  first  went  there  in  1915,  of  course  there  were  no  Com- 
munists, but  following  the  Russian  Revolution  in  1917,  Russians  began 
moving  into  China.  About  1921,  the  Communist  Party  of  China  had 
organized.  They  quickly  spread  their  organization  throughout  all  of 
China.  They  reached  the  island  of  Hainan  in  the  latter  part  of  1922. 


UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  119 

Then  they  began  to  indoctrinate  the  people  there.  By  1925,  they  had 
made  great  progress,  especially  among  young  people. 

"Of  course,  you  understand  that  there  had  been  the  Kevolution  of 
1911,  when  the  empire  was  overthrown  and  the  republic  started.  The 
country  was  in  disorder.  The  Chinese  did  not  quite  know  what  it  was  all 
about.  The  Communists  told  them  that  this  was  the  real  revolution  that 
they  had  been  looking  for,  and  they  said  they  had  all  of  the  answers  to 
Chinese  troubles.  A  great  many  people  believed  them.  By  1925,  they 
almost  took  over  China. 

' '  We  had  to  get  out  a  couple  of  times  by  order  of  the  American  gov- 
ernment because  of  the  disorders.  If  it  had  not  been  for  Chiang  Kai- 
shek  defeating  them  they  would  have  taken  over  China  in  1927.  They 
were  defeated,  but  they  were  not  crushed  because  they  escaped  into  the 
jungles  and  the  mountains  of  Hainan,  down  in  the  tropics  there.  They 
were  fugitives  for  a  number  of  years,  but  kept  on  working  in  the  under- 
ground. 

"As  you  know,  the  Communists  swept  through  China  in  1948-49,  and 
by  the  end  of  1949  they  had  come  to  the  tip  of  the  peninsula  just 
opposite  Hainan.  All  China  had  been  taken  except  Hainan  Island,  and, 
of  course,  Formosa. 

"We  were  getting  ready  to  leave  for  home  on  our  usual  furlough 
when  the  Communists  made  a  surprise  landing  in  April,  1950.  Com- 
munists who  had  been  hiding  in  the  mountains  durings  these  years 
came  out  and  took  over.  The  present  governor  of  Hainan  is  the  same 
man  who  led  the  Communists  as  a  young  man  back  in  1925.  Of  course, 
once  they  took  over  they  really  took  over. 

"Q.  By  force,  of  course? 

"A.  Oh,  yes,  by  force. 

"Q.  Dr.  Bercovitz,  you  say  that  after  the  first  attempt  to  take  over 
China,  the  unsuccessful  attempt,  the  members  of  the  Communist  organ- 
ization went  underground,  fled  and  sought  refuge  in  the  jungle  country 
of  Hainan? 

"A.  That  is  right. 

' '  Q.  They  remained  dormant,  under  cover  and  in  hiding  until  April, 
1950,  when  they  emerged  and  administered  the  coup  de  grace  and  by 
force  conquered  the  final  vestige  of  resistance  remaining  in  China, 
which  was  Hainan? 

"A.  That  is  right. 

"Q.  At  that  time  were  you  still  medical  superintendent  of  the  hos- 
pital ? 

"A.  I  was  still  medical  superintendent  of  the  hospital. 

"Q.  How  many  people  comprised  the  medical  staff? 

"A.  About  125  employees,  altogether,  in  the  hospital. 


120  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

"Q.  "What  was  your  evaluation  of  them  as  to  fundamental  loyalty 
and  opposition  to  Communists  ? 

"A.  I  always  felt  that  they  were  against  Communism. 

"Q.  From  their  activities  and  your  conversation  and  your  inter- 
course with  them  intimately  from  day  to  day,  you  had  an  opportunity 
to  make  that  evaluation,  did  you  not  ? 

"A.  That  is  right. 

' '  Q.  Was  that  your  feeling  about  all  of  your  medical  staff  ? 

"A.  I  felt  that  way  about  all  of  the  staff  because  I  had  been  pretty 
much  on  the  lookout  myself  for  any  who  might  be  disloyal  because  I 
was  afraid  of  what  they  might  do  to  the  rest  of  the  staff. 

"Q.  There  was  a  natural  religious  atmosphere  to  your  institution? 

"A.  Oh,  yes. 

"Q.  Had  that  also  permeated  through  the  members  of  your  staff,  as 
far  as  you  could  tell? 

"A.  Pretty  much,  yes. 

"Q.  Certainly  antithetical  to  atheistic  ideology? 

"A.  Absolutely. 

"Q.  In  April,  1950,  what  happened  so  far  as  your  staff  was  con- 
cerned ? 

' '  A.  When  the  Communists  took  over,  naturally  everyone  was  pretty 
much  agitated  about  it,  including  members  of  the  staff  and  the  em- 
ployees. It  was  then  I  got  some  rather  unpleasant  surprises. 

"Q.  Would  you  describe  them? 

"A.  I  found  there  had  been  among  the  members  of  the  staff  that 
1  considered  perfectly  loyal  and  against  Communism,  and  who  had 
even  taken  a  leading  part  in  the  religious  exercises  of  the  church  and 
the  hospital,  I  found  several  of  those  had  been  Communist  agents, 
working  underground  in  the  hospital. 

"Q.  All  the  time? 

' '  A.  All  the  time. 

"Q.  How  long  had  those  men  been  members  of  your  medical  staff? 

"A.  One  of  the  men  I  know  of  had  been  a  member  for  at  least  a 
dozen  years.  The  woman  who  was  the  leader  among  the  women  under 
the  Communists  had  been  there  for  14  or  15  years  in  the  hospital — 
or  I  will  take  that  back — longer  than  that.  She  had  been  there  about 
18  years. 

"Q.  They  had  conducted  themselves  with  such  cleverness  and  guile 
that  despite  the  fact  you  were  their  medical  superintendent  they  com- 
pletely fooled  you? 

"A.  Yes.  The  woman  was  one  of  the  deaconesses  in  the  church.  The 
man  I  just  mentioned  was  always  a  very  enthusiastic  singer  in  the 
choir.  I  had  no  reason  to  think  he  was  anything  but  anti-Communist. 

1 '  Q.  They  gave  you  that  impression,  both  of  them  ? 


UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  121 

"A.  Yes,  both  of  them,  very  much  so. 

"Q.  What  was  their  attitude  toward  you  immediately  prior  to  their 
emergence  as  underground  Communist  agents,  one  of  friendliness  and 
intimacy  ? 

"A.  Until  they  emerged  as  underground  Communists  there  was  no 
relation  at  all.  I  could  not  tell  any  difference  between  them  and  the 
others. 

' '  Q.  What  was  their  attitude  afterwards  ? 

"A.  They  completely  changed.  It  changed  very  soon  after  the  Com- 
munists came  and  were  in  the  saddle.  They  had  been  having  communica- 
tions secretly  with  the  Communists.  Within  a  few  days,  the  Communist 
leaders  came  in  and  met  with  them  and  before  long  we  could  see  what 
was  going  on  in  the  hospital. 

"Q.  In  other  words,  during  the  period  you  afterward  discovered, 
after  they  took  over,  that  they  had  been  in  contact  and  operating  with 
the  Communist  organization  constantly? 

' '  A.  Yes,  right  along. 

"Q.  So  that  the  preparations  had  been  carefully  laid  when  the  blow 
fell  and  it  was  relatively  simple  for  Communist  forces  to  take  over  ? 

"A.  Absolutely. 

"  Q.  What  happened  to  you  personally  ? 

"A.  At  first,  while  the  Communist  government  was  getting  itself 
organized,  nothing  happened;  but  very  soon  the  government  clamped 
down  on  the  hospital.  Before  long  they  took  over  and  we  were  put  under 
house  arrest. 

' '  These  people  who  had  been  in  the  underground,  of  course,  were  the 
leaders  in  the  hospital.  It  was  a  terrible  thing  to  see  because  having 
been  in  the  hospital  these  years  they  naturally  knew  everything  about 
everybody  on  the  staff.  They  knew  all  about  the  hospital.  Knowing  that 
a  great  many  of  the  staff  members  were  anti- Communist,  they,  of  course, 
put  those  anti-Communist  people  on  the  staff.  They  had  these  people 
who  were  telling  on  them.  There  was  really  a  reign  of  terror  in  the 
hospital.  These  folks  who  had  been  in  the  underground  were  the  leaders 
as  soon  as  the  Communists  took  over. 

"Q.  They  actually  operated  a  reign  of  terror  as  you  described  it. 
That  existed  in  the  hospital  from  that  time  on  ? 

"A.  Absolutely. 

"  Q.  You  were  under  house  arrest  in  the  hospital  ? 

"A.  Yes. 

' '  Q.  Or  in  your  residence  ? 

"A.  No.  They  put  us  out  of  our  residence  and  gave  my  wife  and  me 
a  couple  of  rooms  in  the  hospital,  where  we  stayed.  We  were  there  35 
months  after  the  Communists  came. 


122  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN  CALIFORNIA 

"Q.  35  months? 

"A.  Yes.  That  gave  me  a  chance  to  see  quite  a  bit  about  it.  Even 
though  we  were  under  house  arrest  I  saw  a  great  deal  of  what  went  on. 

"Q.  Would  you  mind  describing  what  took  place  during  that  period 
of  time,  Doctor  1 

"A.  Once  the  Communists  took  over,  the  main  interest  was  to  see 
that  none  of  the  staff  was  allowed  to  leave  the  hospital.  They  had  to 
continue.  The  government  forced  them  to  work  on.  There  was  no  volun- 
tary resigning.  Once  in  a  job  they  were  frozen  there.  That  is  apparently 
the  pattern  of  Communists  wherever  they  go. 

"  Q.  No  freedom  of  individual  choice  ? 

"A.  No  freedom  of  individual  choice  as  to  where  you  are  to  work. 
Then  the  government  fixes  wages  or  the  salaries.  That  was  altogether 
fixed  by  the  government,  with  no  chance  of  protest. 

' '  Then  they  carried  on  a  reign  of  terror  in  the  hospital.  They  intimi- 
dated the  hospital  staff  so  much  that  they  were  living  in  a  constant 
terror  of  being  arrested.  Several  members  were  arrested  and  put  in 
prison  and  never  heard  from  again.  That  is  the  thing  they  were  afraid 
of.  Day  or  night  they  could  never  tell  when  some  of  the  secret  police 
would  come  and  question  them.  Two  o'clock  in  the  morning  was  a 
favorite  time  for  waking  people  up  and  asking  them  to  come  to  the 
police  station  to  answer  questions. 

' '  Q.  By  the  secret  police  ? 

"A.  By  the  secret  police.  So  they  had  the  entire  staff  intimidated. 
Another  thing  they  did,  which  was  extremely  interesting  from  my 
standpoint,  was  the  indoctrination.  From  the  day  they  took  over  the 
hospital,  that  very  afternoon,  they  began  intensive  indoctrination  of 
the  staff.  They  broke  them  up  into  little  groups  or  cells  of  10  to  15. 
Day  after  day,  after  the  hospital  work  was  over,  they  had  to  sit  and 
study  one  of  the  books  on  Communism,  attend  lectures  on  Communism. 
And  till  the  day  we  were  finally  released  that  was  kept  up. 

' '  Q.  There  was  no  choice  about  that  ? 

"A.  No. 

"  Q.  As  far  as  the  individual  was  concerned  ? 

"A.  No.  They  had  to  attend.  They  had  to  write  papers  and  pass 
examinations.  It  was  an  endless  thing,  this  indoctrination. 

"The  attempt  of  the  Communists  is  to  mold  people  to  their  way  of 
thinking.  Once  in  control  there  is  absolutely  no  chance  of  individual 
choice  or  liberty.  From  the  time  a  child  is  born  the  state  practically 
takes  over. 

"The  children  of  the  staff  were  sent  to  Communist  schools,  but  the 
important  thing  about  the  staff,  the  entire  staff  of  doctors  and  nurses 
and  their  employees,  was  that  there  was  absolutely  no  choice,  no  indi- 


UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  123 

vidual  choice.  If  they  wanted  to  leave  or  if  they  wanted  a  change  of 
occupation,  there  was  no  choice  at  all.  They  had  to  carry  on  and  do 
just  what  the  government  told  them  to  do. 

"Q.  You  certainly  saw  the  Communists  rule  by  force  and  terror  at 
first  hand,  then,  didn  't  you  ? 

' '  A.  I  saw  it  at  first  hand  and  it  was  a  terrible  thing. 

"Q.  Dr.  Bercovitz,  have  you  made  any  study  of  the  pattern  of  Com- 
munist techniques  and  activities  in  other  parts  of  the  world  ? 

"A.  No,  I  haven't. 

"Q.  To  see  whether  or  not  they  parallel  the  techniques  that  you  ob- 
served personally  at  Hainan  ? 

"A.  My  only  study  has  been  by  observation  and  by  talking  to  some 
people  who  have  been  in  other  parts  of  the  world  and  who  know  some- 
thing about  Communism.  The  pattern  seems  to  be  the  same  everywhere. 
There  seems  to  be  very  little  variation.  I  think  they  got  their  orders 
probably  from  Russia  because  everything  had  the  Russian  taint  to 
it.  After  the  Communists  took  over  at  Hainan  there  were  a  great 
many  Russians  there.  They  came  as  advisers,  but  actually  they  were 
telling  the  people  what  to  do.  I  think  the  .pattern  is  the  same  every- 
where they  go,  from  what  I  have  read  and  from  what  I  have  heard 
from  talking  to  a  few  people.  I  should  say  the  pattern  is  the  same  every- 
where, and  if  they  came  here  it  would  be  the  same. 

"Q.  Are  you  personally  acquainted  with  Dr.  Ben  Frees  who  pre- 
ceded you  on  the  stand? 

"A.  I  am,  sir. 

"  Q.  How  long  have  you  known  him  ? 

"A.  I  think  I  first  met  him  in  1910. 

■ '  Q.  Have  you  discussed  this  problem  from  time  to  time  ? 

"A.  We  have  talked  things  over. 

"Q.  You  are  aware  in  general  terms  of  the  concern  of  the  officers  of 
the  Los  Angeles  County  Medical  Association  regarding  the  threat  of 
Communist  infiltration  of  their  organization? 

"A.  Yes,  sir. 

"Q.  Basing  your  answer  to  this  question,  Dr.  Bercovitz,  on  your 
experiences  with  Communist  technique  in  the  hospital  where  you 
worked,  would  it  be  possible  for  numerous  members  of  the  Communist 
Party  to  operate  in  the  same  manner  and  with  the  same  technique  in 
a  body  like  the  Los  Angeles  County  Medical  Association  ? 

"A.  I  think  it  would  be,  sir. 

"Q.  Of  course,  you  consider  that  extremely  serious,  as  I  unde~stand 
your  testimony? 

"A.  I  consider  it  extremely  serious. 

"Q.  Do  you  believe  proper  steps  should  be  taken  to  combat  it? 

"  A.  I  think  so,  yes. 


124  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

"Q.  Have  you  ever  been  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party  or  the 
Communist  Political  Association  ? 

"A.  I  have  not. 

"Q.  Do  you  have  any  personal  feeling  of  resentment  or  hostility  to- 
ward us  for  asking  you  that  question  ? 

' '  A.  Not  at  all.  I  think  it  is  a  fair  question. 

"Q.  Do  you  have  anything  else  which  you  can  contribute  to  us,  Dr. 
Bercovitz  ? 

"A.  I  don't  think  so,  except  that  I  am  very  glad  that  there  is  a 
group  looking  into  this. 

"Mr.  Combs:  Thank  you,  that  is  all. 

"Chairman  Burns:  Doctor,  after  the  taking  over  of  your  hospital 
did  the  indoctrination  of  your  staff  and  the  other  methods  of  intimi- 
dation, did  that  change  the  accepted  medical  practices  in  an  attempt  to 
bring  the  practice  of  medicine  as  it  was  carried  out  under  a  different 
aspect  or  different  method  of  any  kind? 

' '  A.  Perhaps  I  can  answer  that  by  saying  that  when  the  Communists 
took  over  the  hospital  the  superintendent  of  the  hospital  was  a  Com- 
munist and  I  don't  think  he  was  ever  in  a  hospital  before.  He  was  a 
good  Communist.  That  is  the  reason  he  was  chosen  for  the  job.  His 
principal  job  was  to  see  that  Communism  was  spread  through  the  staff 
of  the  hospital  and  to  see  that  nothing  was  done  contrary  to  the  prin- 
ciples of  Communism. 

"Q.  Did  he  have  a  medical  education? 

' '  A.  No,  I  don 't  think  he  had  ever  been  in  a  hospital  before.  In  addi- 
tion to  that,  they  had  as  assistant  superintendent  a  doctor.  They  chose 
one  of  the  staff  unwillingly — he  had  no  choice,  but  they  said  he  was  to 
be  assistant  superintendent  in  charge  of  medical  work.  That  is  the  way 
they  ran  the  hospital.  He  had  absolutely  no  power  at  all  in  the  way  of 
administration.  All  that  he  could  do  was  run  the  medical  end  of  things 
as  best  he  could.  Of  course,  I  was  out  of  circulation,  so  I  don't  know 
much  about  the  quality  of  the  work,  but  from  little  things  I  gathered 
the  quality  of  the  work  dropped. 

"The  Chinese  are  basically  individualists.  They  are  freedom  loving 
people.  This  was  a  terrible  thing  for  the  rank  and  file  of  the  people  to 
take.  They  never  had  been  under  anything  like  that  before.  I  under- 
stand that  the  medical  work,  the  quality,  certainly  went  down.  We  were 
running  a  good  hospital  there.  It  was  not  a  good  hospital  after  that. 

"Furthermore,  I  found  out  that  as  far  as  the  preferential  treatment 
in  the  hospital  was  concerned — there  were  other  hospitals  in  Hoi  How 
at  that  time  and  they  combined  them  into  our  hospital.  If  you  belonged 
to  the  Communist  Party  or  if  you  were  employed  by  the  government  or 
were  in  their  family  you  would  be  assured  of  fairly  good  treatment,  but 


UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN  CALIFORNIA  125 

if  you  were  an  ordinary  person  it  was  very  difficult  to  get  good  treat- 
ment. 

"Q.  (By  Mr.  Combs)  :  Suppose  you  were  a  notorious  anti-Commu- 
nist, what  kind  of  treatment  would  you  get  if  you  had  an  appendec- 
tomy to  be  performed  1 

"A.  You  probably  wouldn't  get  that  far.  They  executed  a  number 
of  people  when  they  took  over.  "We  will  never  know  the  number.  I  have 
seen  in  the  newspapers  they  estimate  from  fourteen  to  fifteen  million 
people  were  executed  at  the  time  the  Communists  took  over.  I  think 
that  is  conservative  if  anything.  In  the  Island  of  Hainan  any  number 
of  prominent  people  were  executed  because  they  were  anti-Communists. 

"Q.  Are  you  aware,  Doctor,  that  some  of  the  propaganda  that  ema- 
nates from  the  front  organizations  alleged  to  be  controlled  by  Com- 
munists in  this  city,  and  particularly  in  which  there  is  a  strong  nucleus 
of  physicians,  that  that  propaganda  is  based  largely  on  alleged  dis- 
crimination in  our  hospitals?  Certainly,  from  what  you  have  said,  the 
discrimination  exercised  by  Communists  in  the  hospital  with  which 
you  were  familiar  amounted  to  mass  murder,  didn't  it? 

"A.  That  is  right. 

"Q.  Instead  of  leaving  a  capable  medical  superintendent  in  charge 
of  the  hospital,  after  the  Communists  took  over  they  removed  him  and 
put  in  a  nonmedical  Communist? 

''A.  That  is  exactly  what  happened. 

"Q.  (By  Senator  Thompson)  :  When  they  took  over  were  they  more 
interested  in  medical  problems  than  in  the  other  problems  that  they 
came  across? 

"A.  The  first  thing  with  Communists  is  what  they  call  political 
science.  That  takes  precedence  over  everything  else.  They  wanted  good 
medicine,  but  above  all  they  wanted  to  be  sure  they  had  good 
Communists. 

"Q.  You  mentioned  something  about  the  Chinese  being  indivi- 
dualists. Do  you  believe  as  a  whole  the  Chinese  are  really  in  sympathy 
with  the  Communists,  the  Chinese  people? 

''A.  I  don't  think  so.  Frankly,  Communism  in  China  is  like  it  is 
everywhere  else.  It  is  a  minority  rule.  I  don't  believe  that  there  are 
more  than  three  or  four  million  actual  party  members  in  China  out 
of  a  population  of  over  500,000,000.  But  they  have  seized  control. 
They  have  control  of  the  army.  They  have  control  of  all  bureaus. 
They  have  complete  control  of  the  government.  They  are  holding  the 
rest  practically  as  slaves. 

"Q.  Then  it  holds  true,  Doctor,  that  a  very  small  minority  can  do 
a  great  deal  of  damage? 

"A.  That  is  right.   That  is  it  exactly.   That  is  where  the  danger 


126  UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

"Senator  Thompson:  Thank  yon,  Doctor. 

' '  Chairman  Burns :  Thank  you  very  much,  Doctor.  You  are  excused. 

TESTIMONY  OF  DR.  EUGENE  F.  HOFFMAN,  M.D. 

' '  Chairman  Burns :  Give  us  your  name  and  address,  please. 

"The  Witness:  Eugene  F.  Hoffman,  2212  "West  Third  Street,  Los 
Angeles  57. 

"Q.  (By  Mr.  Combs)  :  Dr.  Hoffman,  you  are  a  licensed  physician 
and  surgeon  in  California? 

"A.  That  is  correct,  sir. 

"Q.  How  long  have  you  been  a  member  of  the  medical  profession? 

"A.  Do  you  mean  the  society? 

"Q.  No,  your  profession.  How  long  have  you  been  licensed? 

"A.  I  was  licensed  in  1933-1932. 

"Q.  And  you  have  practiced  continuously  since  that  time? 

"A.  Yes,  sir. 

"Q.  How  long  have  you  been  a  member  of  the  Los  Angeles  County 
Medical  Association? 

"A.  Since  1935. 

"Q.  Have  you  ever  held  any  office  or  offices  in  the  association? 

"A.  Yes,  sir. 

"Q.  What  were  they? 

"A.  I  am  on  the  council  at  the  present  time.  I  have  just  completed 
my  sixth  year  and  I  have  been  re-elected  for  another  three  years. 

"Q.  That  is  the  council  that  was  mentioned  by  Dr.  Frees? 

"A.  That  is  correct,  sir,  the  policy-making  body. 

"Q.  Have  you  been  out  of  the  state  recently? 

"A.  Yes.  I  just  returned  from  the  interim  session  of  the  American 
Medical  Association  in  Miami. 

"Q.  How  long  were  you  there,  Doctor? 

"A.  From  last  week,  Sunday,  until  last  week,  Thursday  morning. 

' '  Q.  Did  you  perform  any  official  duties  or  hold  any  official  position 
with  regard  to  that  convention? 

"A.  Yes,  I  was  a  member  of  the  House  of  Delegates  as  a  delegate 
from  California  and  also  chairman  of  the  Reference  Committee  on 
the  reports  of  the  secretary  and  the  Board  of  Trustees. 

"Q.  As  a  result  of  your  official  status  at  the  convention  and  the 
nature  of  your  duties  there  that  you  have  just  described,  are  you 
able  to  tell  us,  in  general  terms  of  course,  your  understanding  of  the 
attitude  of  the  American  Medical  Association  toward  Communism  and 
Communist  infiltration  among  its  members? 

"A.  Yes.  I  think  they  have  a  very  definite  policy.  It  is  best  expressed 
in  their  Principles  of  Ethics — I  think  it  is  Chapter  8 — generally,  it  says 


UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  127 

that  a  physician  must  uphold  the  laws  of  his  community  and  be  con- 
cerned Avith  the  things  that  make  a  good  citizen. 

"Q.  Have  you  any  reason  to  believe  that  the  Los  Angeles  County 
Medical  Association  and  the  Los  Angeles  County  medical  profession 
in  general  have  any  need  for  apprehension  concerning  its  members 
who  may  be  Communists,  or  with  Communist  infiltration  in  general? 
;A.  Yes.  I  think  we  have  a  very  definite  problem  here. 
Q.  How  long  have  you  been  aware  of  that  problem? 
A.  Since  about  1948  or  1949,  five  or  six  years,  sir. 
Q.  Would  you  mind  giving  us  the  reasons  for  your  concern? 
A.  The  Council  of  the  Los  Angeles  County  Medical  Association 
decided  to  discuss  the  feasibility  of  an  oath  of  allegiance  or  oath  of 
loyalty  to  the  country  as  a  prerequisite  for  membership,  and  asked  that 
all  officers  and  members  of  the  society  take  this  oath.  Immediately  there 
was  a  furor  raised.  Letters  were  written.  Meetings  were  held.  A  lot  of 
broad  accusations  were  made  of  discrimination  and  that  type  of  thing. 

"Q.  Did  you  become  sufficiently  concerned  with  the  seriousness  of 
the  problem  to  make  it  your  business  to  attend  one  or  more  alleged 
front  meetings  yourself? 

"A.  Yes.  I  attended  a  meeting  at  the  Larchmont  Hall  in  February 
of  1952,  in  the  latter  part  of  February,  around  the  20th  or  25th,  some- 
thing like  that. 

"Q.  Did  you  go  alone  to  that  meeting,  doctor,  or  did  you  go  with 
others  ? 

"A.  No,  I  went  with  Dr.  Alsberge. 

"Q.  Dr.  Marden  Alsberge? 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  Did  you  remain  during  the  entire  course  of  the  meeting? 

"A.  That  is  correct,  sir. 

' '  Q.  Would  you  give  us  the  benefit  of  your  general  impressions  as  to 
the  nature  of  the  meeting  and  its  implications  ? 

"A.  Principally  and  basically  the  meeting  was  called  to  protest  the 
discharge  of  three  of  the  doctors  from  the  Cedars  of  Lebanon  Hospital 
here  in  the  city.  These  three  men  were  discharged  from  the  staff.  There 
was  a  great  deal  of  discussion  and  comparison  with  these  men  with 
some  of  the  early  scientists  like  Galileo  and  that  group,  and  how  they 
were  being  discriminated  against  because  they  had  attended  a  meeting 
of  a  so-called  radical  group.  One  man  said  the  reason  he  was  being  dis- 
criminated against  was  because  there  was  a  meeting  at  his  house.  I  think 
another  one  said  he  had  attended  a  prisoner  as  his  physician  who  was 
held  here  in  the  city,  and  he  was  being  discriminated  against  because 
he  had  administered,  in  line  of  professional  duty,  to  the  particular 


128  UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

prisoner.  I  don't  remember  the  name  of  the  prisoner,  but  I  think  the 
name  was  mentioned  at  that  time. 

"Q.  It  has  been  mentioned  here  in  testimony  yesterday,  doctor.  It 
was  Bernadette  Doyle. 

"A.  Yes.  Thank  you. 

"Q.  Did  you  attend  any  other  meetings? 

' '  A.  That  is  the  only  one  I  attended,  sir. 

"Q.  Are  you  aware  as  a  member  of  the  Council  that  the  Los  Angeles 
County  Medical  Association  requested  this  committee  to  conduct  an 
investigation  concerning  the  alleged  infiltration  by  Communists  and 
to  hold  this  meeting? 

"A.  Yes,  sir. 

' '  Q.  Are  you  in  accord  with  that  attitude  on  the  part  of  the  associa- 
tion? 

"A.  Very  definitely.  I  think  it  is  a  definite  threat. 

"Q.  You  believe  there  is  a  definite  and  serious  problem  to  be 
handled  ? 

"A.  Yes,  sir,  definitely. 

"Q.  Have  you,  yourself,  doctor,  ever  been  a  member  of  the  Commu- 
nist Party  or  of  the  Communist  Political  Association  ? 

"A.  No,  sir. 

' '  Mr.  Combs :  I  think  that  is  all. 

"Senator  Thompson:  No  questions. 

"Mr.  Combs:  Thank  you  very  much,  doctor. 

TESTIMONY  OF  DR.  E.  VINCENT  ASKEY,  M.D. 

"Q.   (By  Mr.  Combs)  :  Your  name? 

"A.  My  name  is  E.  Vincent  Askey. 

"Q.  Your  residence  address  is? 

"A.  757  Malcolm,  Los  Angeles.  My  office  is  at  2210  West  Third 
Street. 

"Q.  You  are  a  duly  licensed  physician  and  surgeon  in  California,  are 
you  not  ? 

"A.  I  am,  sir. 

"Q.  How  long  have  you  been  so  licensed? 

"A.  I  was  licensed  in  1923. 

"Q.  Have  you  practiced  your  profession  in  California  since  that 
time. 

"A.  Ever  since. 

"Q.  Have  you  ever  held  an  office  in  the  California  State  Medical 
Association  ? 


UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  129 

"A.  Yes,  I  have  held  several  offices.  I  was  First  Speaker  of  the 
House  of  Delegates  for  several  years.  Then  I  was  Speaker,  and  then 
I  was  President  of  the  California  Medical  Association. 

"Q.  In  what  year? 

"A.  In  the  years  of  1948  to  1949. 

"Q.  Have  you  ever  held  any  office  in  the  Los  Angeles  County  Med- 
ical Association  ? 

"A.  I  have. 

"Q.  What  were  they? 

"A.  I  was  the  secretary-treasurer.  Then  I  was  a  member  of  the  Board 
of  Trustees.  I  was  chairman  of  that  board.  Then  I  was  President  of  the 
Los  Angeles  County  Medical  Association. 

"Q.  What  year? 

''A.  I  was  president  in  1943. 

' '  Q.  Have  you  ever  held  any  position  in  the  Los  Angeles  City  Board 
of  Education? 

"A.  Yes,  sir,  I  was  member  and  president  one  year. 

' '  Q.  What  year  were  you  president  ? 

"A.  I  think  1940  to  1941. 

"Q.  Have  you  recently  been  out  of  the  State,  Doctor? 

"  A.  I  just  returned  last  week. 

"Q.  What  was  the  reason  for  your  absence? 

"A.  I  was  at  a  meeting  of  the  American  Medical  Association  held 
in  Miami,  Florida. 

"Q.  How  long  were  you  there? 

"A.  I  arrived  on  Thursday,  a  week  ago  this  last  Thursday,  and  I 
was  there  10  days. 

"Q.  Did  you  participate  in  any  of  the  activities  of  the  meeting  there 
in  any  official  capacity? 

"A.  Yes,  sir.  I  am  First  Speaker  of  the  House  of  Delegates  to  the 
American  Medical  Association;  I  presided  at  part  of  their  meetings. 

"Q.  At  any  of  the  deliberations  or  activities  of  the  convention  was 
the  matter  of  Communism  in  the  association  discussed? 

' '  A.  Yes,  if  you  will  qualify  the  word  Communism,  although  every- 
body understood  that  was  what  we  meant.  Let  me  qualify  that  by  saying 
that  there  was  a  resolution  brought  in  on  the  house  in  which  it  was 
suggested  that  the  American  Medical  Association  deny  membership 
to  any  doctor  who  is  discharged  or  denied  medical  service  because  of 
being  a  security  risk.  This  was  understood  to  mean  Communism  and 
its  ilk.  If  you  will  allow  me,  if  I  may,  to  tell  you  the  disposition  of 
that— 

"Q.I  wish  you  would. 

"A.  The  reference  committee  that  considered  this  resolution  brought 
three  recommendations  which  were  adopted.   They  stated  that,  first, 


130  UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

since  this  resolution  only  referred  to  those  who  were  deferred  or  dis- 
charged from  military  duty  that  it  was  not  broad  enough  and  only 
took  in  a  segment  of  our  profession.  They  felt  that  such  consideration 
should  be  given  to  all  doctors  of  medicine  and  all  members  of  the 
American  Medical  Association.  Secondly,  that  a  change  of  our  consti- 
tution would  be  necessary,  and  were  this  resolution  adopted  it  would 
require  laying  on  the  table  for  one  year. 

' '  Thirdly,  that  after  all  it  was  entirely  unnecessary  because  for  many 
years,  if  not  from  the  very  establishment  of  the  American  Medical 
Association,  our  principles  of  ethics  have  stated  definitely  that  all 
members  are  hereby  called  upon  to  give  allegiance  to  and  support  the 
laws  of  our  country  and  to  the  needs  of  humanity.  This  report  of  the 
committee  therefore  stated  they  felt  such  a  resolution  was  unnecessary 
in  view  of  the  fact  the  tenets  of  the  American  Medical  Association  have 
always  been  for  the  support  of  our  government.  That  was  the  dispo- 
sition that  was  made,  sir. 

"Q.  Dr.  Askey,  going  back  to  your  tenure  as  President  of  the  Los 
Angeles  City  Board  of  Education.  That  was  in  1937  to  1943? 

"A.  I  served  six  years,  1937  to  1943. 

"Q.  During  that  period  of  time  did  you  have  any  practical  expe- 
rience with  Communism? 

"A.  If  you  call  it  practical.  It  was  very  disturbing. 

' '  Q.  Here  is  what  I  mean  by  practical,  Dr.  Askey :  did  you  have  any 
contact  or  experience  during  that  period  of  time  with  an  organization 
called  the  Worker's  Alliance? 

"  A.  I  certainly  did. 

"Q.  Did  you  have  any  contact  or  experience  with  another  organiza- 
tion called  the  State,  County  and  Municipal  Workers  of  America? 

"A.  I  don't  remember  the  exact  name,  but  I  can  tell  you  this,  that 
Workers  Alliance  representatives,  and  great  crowds  of  them  were  in 
our  board  meeting  rooms,  caused  disturbances  many  times.  As  presi- 
dent, many  times  I  almost  had  to  have  them  removed  from  the  room. 
I  remember  one  time  a  certain  Mr.  Harry  Bridges  had  come  to  town. 
He  had  requested  the  use  of  one  of  our  high  schools  for  a  speech,  which 
I  objected  to  very  strenuously.  I  wish  I  knew  the  man.  I  could  not  point 
him  out,  but  as  I  left  the  meeting  one  of  the  men  that  I  believe  stated 
that  he  was  a  member  of  the  Worker's  Alliance  told  me  that  I  would 
be  the  second  man  in  Los  Angeles  to  be  put  against  the  fence  and  shot 
by  the  Communists,  of  which  I  was  very  proud. 

"Q.  The  Communist  Party  was  a  little  more  arrogant  and  imposing 
in  those  days  than  it  has  been  since.  Is  that  true? 

"A.  I  imagine  so.  They  didn't  mince  any  words  at  that  time. 

"Q.  Were  you  aware  of  the  nature  of  the  Worker's  Alliance  at  that 
time,  and  its  control? 


UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  131 

"A.  Only  partially.  I  had  no  proof  of  it  except  from  their  actions 
and  the  type  of  thing  and  the  statements  of  several  members  to  me, 
that  I  would  be  defeated  at  my  next  election  because  the  Communist 
Party  was  going  to  oppose  me.  I  asked  them  if  that  were  true,  these 
people  who  were  talking  to  me,  and  they  assured  me  it  was.  Right 
then  I  told  them  I  would  give  them  some  information,  that  I  had  de- 
cided not  to  run  again,  but  since  they  said  they  were  going  to  defeat 
me,  I  certainly  would.  I  was  elected  by  the  greatest  majority  cast  in 
that  election  in  1941. 

"Q.  By  reason  of  your  experiences  with  the  Worker's  Alliance  at 
that  time,  were  you  able  to  form  any  conviction  concerning  their  activi- 
ties on  behalf  of  the  people  who  were  unemployed  or  on  relief? 

"A.  I  don't  know  exactly  what  your  question  means. 

"Q.  Let  me  make  it  more  explicit.  The  Worker's  Alliance,  according 
to  hearings  held  by  this  committee  in  1941,  1942  and  1943,  was  found 
to  be  headed  by  a  man  named  Alexander  Noral,  who  was  identified  by 
many  witnesses  as  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party.  In  1940,  he  was 
on  the  presidential  electorate  slate  as  an  avid  Communist,  which,  of 
course,  was  quite  persuasive  concerning  at  least  this  top  officer  of  the 
Worker's  Alliance.  The  organization  which  ostensibly  functioned  as  a 
union  had  for  one  of  its  express  purposes  the  relief  of  people  who 
were  unemployed.  I  am  simply  inquiring  of  you,  Dr.  Askey,  whether 
or  not  you  have  any  personal  information  as  to  the  activities  of  the 
Worker's  Alliance  in  that  connection? 

"A.  Yes,  I  do,  now  that  you  call  it  to  my  attention.  I  remember  at 
one  time  at  a  board  of  education  meeting  there  was  a  group  present, 
at  which  time,  in  view  of  the  needs  of  the  group,  there  was  furnished 
to  these  families  who  were  apparently  working  under  state  relief,  or 
the  Worker's  Alliance  type,  shoes  and  other  articles  of  clothing.  The 
Worker's  Alliance  protested  strongly  to  the  board  of  education  that 
these  shoes  furnished  to  them  were  repaired  shoes  and  that  they  wanted 
to  be  given  the  finest  shoes  and  the  newest  shoes  because  here  they  were 
being  given  shoes  that  were  repaired.  I  examined  some  of  the  shoes. 
They  were  better  than  those  I  was  wearing  at  the  time.  It  seems  to 
me  they  were  just  stirring  up  all  sorts  of  trouble  trying  to  foment 
trouble  in  every  possible  governmental  board.  I  was  told  that  the 
board  of  education  was  only  one  of  the  governmental  boards  at  which 
these  turmoils  and  troubles  were  started  by  similar  groups.  I  became 
very  alarmed  at  it  at  that  time,  sir. 

"Q.  Since  then,  Dr.  Askey,  have  you  endeavored  to  keep  yourself 
generally  informed  concerning  the  functions  and  activities  of  the  Com- 
munists in  this  area? 

"A.  I  have.  I  may  tell  you  why  I  was  so  upset  a  little  later.  An 
old  professor  of  mine  told  me  when  I  started  to  practice  medicine, 


132  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

he  said,  'Align  yourself  with  your  organized  profession  and  take  on 
the  duties  of  your  Country  as  a  citizen. '  That  was  Dr.  David  Reissman 
of  Philadelphia.  I  have  always  valued  him  as  a  friend  and  great 
adviser.  As  I  have  told  you,  I  started  as  a  member  of  my  association, 
and  later  as  an  officer.  I  took  up  my  duties  as  a  citizen  on  the  board 
of  education,  and  other  activities.  I  found  that  in  the  medical  profes- 
sion there  were  men  who  did  not  seem  to  have  the  ideals  and  the  love 
for  my  Country.  In  1949,  at  the  meeting  which  Dr.  Frees  and  the  other 
gentleman  have  testified  about,  I  was  told  about  it  and  asked  to  go. 
I  was  so  upset  because  it  was  in  regard  to  professional  license  in  the 
State,  objections  by  men  who  held  licenses  in  our  profession  in  Cali- 
fornia, who  were  objecting  to  the  loyalty  oath  and  felt  it  was  the 
establishment  of  Naziism  in  our  Country. 

"I  have  never  seen  any  reason  why  a  person  should  not  say  that  he 
loved  something.  I  think  it  is  pretty  generally  understood  that  if  you 
love  your  wife  you  don't  object  if  she  asks  you  if  you  love  her.  Nor 
do  I  see  why  I  should  object  to  saying  I  am  loyal  to  my  Country,  or 
I  love  her. 

''That  was  the  reason  I  was  interested  in  this  meeting.  I  went  with 
the  other  gentlemen  and  I  was  astounded  to  see  there  a  doctor  of 
medicine  as  chairman  of  the  meeting.  I  saw  a  member  of  the  clergy 
who  spoke.  I  saw  a  member  of  the  dental  profession  who  spoke.  I  saw 
an  attorney.  They  all  spoke  and  stated — I  can  give  you  the  ones  who 
said  it.  The  clergyman,  Rabbi  Cohn,  stated  that  he  had  been  in  Ger- 
many and  had  seen  the  development  of  Naziism  and  the  rules  and  laws 
of  Naziism  could  not  compare  with  the  terrible  rules  and  laws  of  our 
country.  Such  a  thing  is  ridiculous  to  me,  but  it  showed  me  that  the 
professions  of  our  State  were  infiltrated  with  a  terribly  disloyal  group 
of  individuals.  (Committee's  italics.)  I  saw  a  doctor  as  chairman.  I  saw 
another  doctor  get  up,  by  the  name  of  Perry.  This  is  the  thing  I  was 
going  to  tell  you  that  disturbed  me.  He  stated  his  forefathers  came  over 
on  the  Mayflower. 

"Q.  That  was  Thomas  Perry? 

"A.  That  was  Thomas  Perry.  What  disturbed  me,  my  ancestors 
came  over  here  and  my  great-grandmother's  name  was  Perry  and  I 
was  afraid  he  might  be  some  relation  of  mine.  (Laughter.)  Anyway, 
I  was  greatly  disturbed  at  that  meeting.  That  was  one  of  the  reasons 
why  I  have  been  interested  in  it,  sir. 

"Q.  Dr.  Askey,  are  you  aware  of  the  fact  that  the  committee  was 
invited  and  asked  to  conduct  this  investigation? 

"A.  I  am,  sir. 

' '  Q.  Did  that  have  your  support  ? 


UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  133 

"A.  It  had  iny  support  entirely,  although  I  wasn't  a  member  of  the 
council  and  did  not  have  an  opportunity  to  vote  on  it,  but  I  am  very 
greatly  in  favor  of  it,  sir. 

"Q.  Did  you  attend  any  other  meetings  besides  the  ones  you  have 
described  ? 

"A.  No.  That  was  the  only  one,  sir. 

"Q.  Have  you  discussed  with  your  colleagues  in  the  profession  meet- 
ings other  than  the  one  you  described  which  were  attended  by  them? 

"A.  Yes,  I  have. 

"Q.  At  considerable  length  ? 

''A.  Yes. 

"Q.  As  a  result  of  your  conversations  with  them,  as  a  result  of  your 
personal  experiences  with  the  Worker's  Alliance  and  Communist  pres- 
sure groups  that  you  have  alluded  to  as  president  of  the  Board  of  Edu- 
cation and  a  member  of  it,  and  as  a  result  of  your  experience  as  a 
member  of  the  American  Medical  Association,  all  of  these  things,  what 
is  your  opinion  concerning  the  seriousness  of  the  threatened  infiltration 
of  the  association,  that  is,  the  Los  Angeles  County  Medical  Association, 
by  Communists  ? 

"A.  I  think  it  is  very,  very  dangerous.  I  think  perhaps  it  has  great 
dangers  because  I  fear  that  they  have  gone  undercover  more.  And,  as 
Dr.  Bercovitz — whom  I  never  met  until  this  morning — told  you,  that 
even  those  whom  he  was  sure  of  he  found  out  later  were  working  against 
him.  I  wonder  whether  or  not  some  of  the  men  that  I  am  certain  of  may 
not  be  doing  the  same  thing. 

"As  a  representative  of  my  profession  of  medicine  and  following  the 
dictates  of  the  American  Medical  Association  that  we  support  our  Gov- 
ernment, I  feel  it  is  my  duty  that  we  go  to  every  extent  and  find  out 
if  there  is  such  a  danger  and  if  there  is  to  combat  it. 

"We  don't  believe  in  any  witch  hunt,  whatsoever.  We  believe  that  the 
great  majority  of  doctors  are  loyal  to  our  Country  as  evidenced  by 
peace  time  and  especially  their  war  records,  and  we  stand  ready  to  help 
you  gentlemen.  You,  being  a  state  organization  and  committee,  have  the 
facilities  by  which  you  can  take  these  things  up  without  any  question  of 
witch  hunting  in  any  way.  We  want  it  through  the  organization,  the 
official  committee  of  our  State.  They  should  and  I  believe  will  take  care 
of  this  matter.  That  is  why  I  am  here.  (Committee's  italics.) 

"Q.  Have  you  ever  been  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party  or  Com- 
munist Political  Association,  Dr.  Askey? 

"A.  Never  and  I  never  intend  to  be.  I  am  very  happy  to  tell  you  that. 

"Mr.  Combs:  I  think  that  is  all,  Mr.  Chairman. 

"Chairman  Burns:  No  questions. 

' '  Mr.  Combs :  Thank  you,  Dr.  Askey. 


134  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

TESTIMONY  OF  DR.  SIDNEY  KOLODNY,  M.D. 
:Q.  (By  Mr.  Combs)  :  Your  name  is  Sidney  Kolodny? 
A.  That  is  correct. 

Q.  You  spell  your  last  name  K-o-l-o-d-n-y  ? 
A.  That  is  correct. 

Q.  You  are  a  physician  and  surgeon? 
A.  Yes,  sir. 

Q.  You  are  licensed  to  practice  your  profession  in  California? 
A.  Yes,  sir. 
:'Q.  How  long  have  you  been  so  licensed,  Doctor? 
A.  Since  1945. 

Q.  What  is  your  medical  field,  Dr.  Kolodny? 
A.  Obstetrics  and  gynecology. 
Q.  Are  you  on  the  staff  of  any  hospital  or  clinic? 
A.  Yes,  sir. 

Q.  Would  you  name  them,  please  ? 
;'A.  Queen  of  Angels,  Temple  Hospital,  Cedars  of  Lebanon  Hospital. 
;'Q.  Did  you  ever  do  any  work  or  were  you  ever  on  the  staff  of  a 
clinic  in  Los  Angeles  known  as  the  Community  Medical  Cent  erf 
:A.  Yes,  sir. 

'Q.  When  did  you  start  working  in  conjunction  with  that  center? 
A.  November,  1947. 

'Q.  Your  association  with  it  continued  until  when? 
A.  Until  November,  1953. 

Q.  Did  you  form  any  general  opinion  concerning  the  political  char- 
acter of  the  medical  staff  of  the  Community  Medical  Center  during  the 
period  that  you  were  associated  there? 
"A.  Yes,  sir. 

"Q.  Would  you  mind  telling  the  committee  what  that  opinion  was? 
"A.  It  is  my  opinion  that  most  of  the  members  of  the  medical  staff 
were  sympathetic  toward  left  wing  organizations. 
' '  Chairman  Burns :  They  cannot  hear  you. 

' '  Mr.  Combs :  The  answer  was  that  his  opinion  of  the  members  of  the 
staff  was  that  they  were  sympathetic  toward  left  wing  organizations. 
"Q.  By  left  wing  organizations  would  you  include  the  Communist 
Party  ? 

"A.  Yes,  sir. 

"Q.  Did  you  see  copies  of  the  Daily  People's  World  occasionally  in  the 
physical  building  where  the  center  is  located? 
"A.  Yes,  I  did. 

"Q.  Your  conclusions  concerning  the  political  nature  of  a  large 
group  of  the  staff  members  was  drawn  from  your  conversations  with 
them? 


UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  135 

"A.  It  is  just  a  general  impression. 

"Q.  It  is  just  a  general  impression?  Were  you  ever  asked  to  sign  any 
petitions  of  a  political  nature  while  you  were  there  ? 

"A.  Yes,  sir. 

"Q.  Would  you  mind  telling  us  what  they  were? 

"A.  I  was  asked  to  sign  petitions  in  support  of  the  Rosenbergs  and 
the  Rosenberg  trial. 

"Q.  In  favor  of  the  Rosenbergs? 

"A.  Yes.  When  three  doctors  were  expelled  from  the  staff  of  the 
Cedars  of  Lebanon  there  was  a  petition  circulated  to  reinstate  the  doc- 
tors. I  was  requested  to  sign  that  petition,  too. 

"Q.  You  were  requested  to  sign  a  petition  on  behalf  of  the  three 
doctors  at  the  Cedars  of  Lebanon  Hospital? 

"The  reporters  at  the  table  are  gesticulating  that  they  cannot  hear 
what  you  saj^,  Doctor.  Were  there  any  other  petitions  ? 

"A.  Several  years  ago,  there  was  a  petition  in  favor  of  Harry 
Bridges.  I  don't  know  the  exact  nature  of  the  petition. 

"  Q.  In  connection  with  the  attempt  at  deportation  of  Harry  Bridges  ? 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  Did  you  or  did  you  not  consent  to  sign  any  of  those  petitions? 

"A.  I  did  not  consent. 

"Q.  Why  did  you  terminate  your  association  at  the  Community 
Medical  Center? 

"A.  I  terminated  my  association  primarily  because  I  didn't  agree 
with  the  political  ideas.  And,  secondly,  I  did  not  feel  that  I  wanted  to 
continue  there  because  they  had  decreased  the  return  financially  in  my 
position. 

"Q.  For  financial  reasons? 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  You  said  you  were  on  the  staff  of  the  Queen  of  Angels  Hospital 
in  Los  Angeles.  That  is  a  Catholic  institution,  a  Catholic  hospital, 
isn't  it? 

' '  A.  Yes,  sir. 

"Q.  Were  you  a  member  of  the  staff  at  that  hospital,  the  Queen  of 
Angels  Hospital,  in  October,  1950? 

"A.  Yes,  sir. 

"Q.  Are  you  aware,  or  were  you  aware  at  that  time  of  a  charge 
leveled  against  the  hospital  by  the  Community  Medical  Center  and  by 
the  medical  division  of  an  organization  known  as  the  Arts,  Sciences 
and  Professions  Council  and  by  a  publication  known  as  the  Daily  People's 
World,  all  of  which  alleged  racial  discrimination  against  a  colored 
woman  who  was  a  patient  in  the  hospital  ? 

"A.  Yes,  sir. 

"Q.  You  are  familiar  with  that? 


136  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN  CALIFORNIA 

"A.  Yes,  sir. 

"Q.  You  were  directly  involved  in  that? 

"A.  Yes,  I  was. 

"Q.  To  some  extent,  were  you  not? 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  How  long  have  you  been  a  member  of  the  staff  at  Queens? 

"A.  Since  1945. 

"Q.  Continuously? 

"A.  Yes,  sir. 

"Q.  Have  you  ever  seen  any  evidence  of  any  racial  discrimination 
or  prejudice  at  that  hospital? 

"A.  No,  sir. 

"Q.  Never?  Have  you  seen  in  any  hospital  at  which  you  have  ever 
practiced,  or  with  which  you  have  ever  been  connected,  which  had  a 
greater  tolerance  or  greater  lack  of  discrimination  because  of  race, 
color,  creed,  or  any  other  reason  than  Queens  ? 

"A.  No,  sir,  I  have  not. 

"Q.  Is  it  your  opinion  that  Queens  was  outstanding  in  that  respect? 

"A.  Yes,  sir,  it  was. 

"Q.  In  your  opinion  it  was? 

"A.  Yes,  it  was. 

"Q.  I  show  you  now  a  sheet  from  a  publication  called  The  California 
Eagle,  published  in  Los  Angeles,  the  edition  of  Thursday,  November  9, 
1950.  I  call  your  attention  specifically  to  an  article  which  appears  on 
page  4,  columns  2  and  3,  and  ask  you  if  you  are  generally  familiar 
with  that  particular  article? 

"A.  Yes,  sir. 

"Q.  You  are? 

"A.  Yes,  sir. 

"Q.  Have  j^ou  read  it  before? 

"A.  I  read  it  several  years  ago. 

"Q.  Would  you  mind  glancing  at  it  now  and  refreshing  your  mem- 
ory, please.  You  have  read  that  article? 

"A.  Yes,  sir. 

"Q.  Is  there  any  basic  truth  to  the  allegations  of  discrimination 
set  forth  in  that  article? 

"A.  No,  sir. 

"Q.  Is  it  untrue? 

"A.  It  is  untrue. 

"Q.  I  next  show  you  a  photostatic  reproduction  of  an  issue  of  the 
Daily  People's  World  for  October  31,  1950,  page  2,  under  the  by-line  of 
Virginia  Gardner  and  ask  you  if  you  have  seen  that  article  before? 
Your  name  is  mentioned  in  it. 


UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN  CALIFORNIA  137 

"A.  I  remember  that  very  well,  sir. 

"Q.  You  remember  it  very  well,  do  you  not? 

"A.  Yes,  sir. 

"Q.  Is  there  any  basic  truth  to  the  allegations  concerning  discrimi- 
nation set  forth  in  that  article? 

"A.  No,  sir. 

"Q.  None,  whatsoever? 

"A.  No,  sir. 

"Q.  Do  you  know  that  of  your  own  knowledge? 

"A.  Yes,*  sir. 

"Q.  Because  you  were  the  doctor  who  was  directly  involved  in  this 
particular  matter,  were  you  not? 

"A.  That  is  correct,  sir. 

"Q.  And  that  is  simply  a  fabrication,  and  the  allegation  of  dis- 
crimination is  made  without  any  foundation  whatever? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Mr.  Combs:  Mr.  Chairman,  I  dislike  to  take  time  to  do  this  but  I 
think  it  is  sufficiently  important  to  do  so.  There  are  two  columns  of 
the  article  in  the  Daily  People's  World  which  should  be  read  into  the 
transcript  at  this  point,  otherwise  it  will  be  attached  as  an  exhibit 
and  will  not  fit  into  the  continuity  of  the  testimony  of  this  witness. 

'  •  Chairman  Burns :  Very  well. 

' '  Mr.  Combs :  It  reads  as  follows :  '  Los  Angeles,  October  30.  A  pro- 
test against  most  undemocratic  discrimination  and  personal  abuse  prac- 
ticed upon  a  patient  for  reasons  of  race  was  made  to  the  Queen  of 
Angels  Hospital  by  the  Medical  Division  of  the  Arts,  Sciences  and 
Professions  Council. 

"  'ASP's  investigation  of  the  case  of  Mrs.  Lois  Rambo,  wife  of 
Jerome  Rambo,  a  nego,  was  undertaken  in  connection  with  a  study  of 
discrimination  in  the  Los  Angeles  hospitals  and  medical  schools. 

"  'In  letters  dated  October  25  and  released  today,  ASP  addressed 
protests  not  only  to  the  hospital  but  to  a  physician,  Dr.  Sidney  M. 
Kolodny' your  middle  initial  is  'M',  isn't  it? 

"The  witness:  Yes,  sir. 

"Mr.    Combs    (continuing:    ' and   to    the    Community   Medical 

Center,  with  which  the  physician  is  associated. 

"  'The  center  was  urged  to  investigate  the  mistreatment  of  Mrs. 
Rambo  and  institute  disciplinary  proceedings  against  Dr.  Kolodny  for 
his  failure  to  support  her  in  her  protests  against  discriminatory  treat- 
ment. 

"  'At  first  placed  in  a  semiprivate  room  along  with  another  white 
mother,  Mrs.   Rambo,   after  the  birth  of  her  baby,  was  removed  to 


138  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

another  floor,  apparently  when  it  was  learned  that  her  husband  was 
a  negro. 

"  'Because  the  room  to  which  she  was  moved  was  outside  the 
maternity  ward,  Mrs.  Ranibo  was  not  able  to  have  her  baby  for  nursing. 
Only  after  persistent  demands  that  she  be  placed  where  she  could 
nurse  the  child,  was  she  removed,  this  time  to  a  room  which  she 
shared  with  a  negro  mother. 

"  'Unnerved  by  the  mental  anguish  of  separation  from  her  newborn 
infant,  the  mother  found  herself  unable  to  nurse  her  child  and  was 
removed  by  her  husband  to  the  family  home  after  three  days. 

"  'The  ASP  Medical  Division,  under  signature  of  Dr.  Murray  Abo- 
witz,  acting  executive  secretary,  told  Queen  of  Angels  Hospital  that 
ASP  was  deeply  shocked  to  learn  that  your  institution  basing  itself 
upon  the  principles  of  brotherly  love,  had  permitted  such  treatment 
of  Mrs.  Rambo. 

"  'The  patient,  the  letter  declared,  was  at  first  denied  the  right  to 
nurse  her  child,  and  was  reviled  and  insulted  by  sisters,  nurses,  physi- 
cians and  a  priest. 

"  'Declaring  such  treatment  a  violation  of  the  very  Christian  virtues 
which  you  profess,  ASP  medical  men  called  on  the  hospital  to  correct 
this  wrongful  act  by  an  open  apology  to  Mr.  and  Mrs.  Rambo  and  to 
pledge  that  no  further  discrimination  or  segregation  would  be  prac- 
ticed against  any  minority  group. 

"  'Dr.  Kolodny  was  taken  to  task  by  the  ASP  Medical  Division  for 
his  part  in  Mrs.  Rambo 's  experience.  Second  only  to  the  hospital's 
guilt  was  his  failure  to  support  a  patient  at  a  time  of  need,  ASP  said. 
The  letter  to  Dr.  Kolodny  continued : 

"  '  "Not  only  did  you  fail  to  support  her,  but  according  to  the 
patient's  own  words,  you  participated  in  the  current  of  abuse  and  in- 
vective that  was  hurled  at  her." 

"  'Dr.  Kolodny  was  urged  to  apologize  openly  and  sincerely  to  Mrs. 
Rambo.  The  Community  Medical  Center,  5501  South  Broadway,  the 
Medical  Division  of  ASP  declared,  it  is  inexcusable  for  such  treatment 
to  be  accorded  a  patient  because  of  her  marriage  to  a  Negro  individual. 
It  is  doubly  regrettable  that  a  physician  associated  with  the  progres- 
sive institution  in  the  community  should  behave  in  the  manner  that 
has  been  reported  concerning  Dr.  Kolodny. ' 

' '  Q.  When  you  read  that,  Dr.  Kolodny,  what  was  your  reaction  ? 

"A.  I  was  flabbergasted. 

"Q.  Why? 

"A.  Because  the  accusations  were  entirely  untrue. 

"Q.  You  were  the  doctor  directly  involved? 

"A.  Yes,  I  was. 


UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN  CALIFORNIA  139 

"Q.  So,  of  course  you  would  know. 

"A.  That  is  right. 

"Q.  You  already  have  said  that  that  particular  hospital  was  out- 
standing for  its  lack  of  discrimination  or  segregation? 

1 '  A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  "Would  you  amplify  that  for  us,  please? 

"A.  Yes.  During  the  years  I  have  been  in  practice  in  Los  Angeles 
I  have  never  had  difficulty  getting  a  bed  for  a  patient  at  the  Queen  of 
Angels  Hospital  regardless  of  the  patient's  race,  color  or  creed.  I  was 
never  asked  what  the  patient's  color  was  at  the  time  of  admission.  The 
patient  was  just  admitted  routinely. 

"Q.  Like  anybody  else? 

"A.  Yes,  sir. 

"Q.  And  was  not  shown  any  abuse  or  favoritism  one  way  or  an- 
other? 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  What  is  the  reason  you  attribute  to  this  kind  of  a  statement? 

"A.  I  imagine  it  was  used  as  propaganda. 

"Q.  I  will  ask  you  the  question  I  have  asked  the  other  witnesses,  Dr. 
Kolodny.  Are  you  now  or  have  you  ever  been  a  member  of  the  Commu- 
nist Party  or  Communist  Political  Association  ? 

"A.  No,  sir. 

' '  Q.  You  never  have  ? 

"A.  No,  sir. 

' '  Q.  You  have  never  belonged  to  any  subversive  organizations  of  any 
kind  so  far  as  you  know? 

"A.  No,  sir. 

"Q.  We  are  very  grateful  to  you,  Dr.  Kolodny,  for  coming  here 
and  testifying.  You  requested  that  you  be  excused  early.  I  have  no 
further  questions,  unless  you  have  something  to  add. 

' '  A.  No,  sir,  I  have  nothing  further  to  add. 

' '  Chairman  Burns :  On  behalf  of  the  committee,  Doctor,  we  express 
our  sincere  appreciation.  You  have  done  a  good  public  service.  I  know 
this  has  been  a  demand  on  your  time. 

"Mr.  Combs:  May  Dr.  Kolodny  be  excused? 

"Chairman  Burns:  Yes,  you  may  be  excused." 

TESTIMONY  OF  DR.  JACK  FLASHER,  M.D. 

"Chairman  Burns:  Are  you  ready  with  Dr.  Flasher,  Mr.  Marshall? 

"Mr.  Marshall:  My  name  is  Daniel  G.  Marshall.  I  am  an  attorney, 
1151  South  Broadway,  Richmond  79392. 

' '  Mr.  Combs :  Mr.  Marshall,  may  I  have  a  word  with  you  about  your 
client  before  he  testifies  ? 

(Short  interruption  at  this  point.) 


140  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

"Mr.  Marshall:  I  have  a  motion  to  address  to  the  committee  first, 
Mr.  Combs. 

"Mr.  Combs:  All  right. 

"Mr.  Marshall:  Senator  Burns,  my  client  was  served  with  a  com- 
mittee subpena  on  Sunday  afternoon.  He  reached  me  by  telephone 
sometime  Sunday  night.  He  wanted  to  consult  with  me  with  respect  to 
his  rights  when  he  appears  as  a  witness  before  this  committee.  His 
office  is  in  an  outlying  section  or  sections  of  the  community.  My  office 
is  downtown.  I  was  occupied  with  other  matters.  We  found  it  impos- 
sible to  get  together  for  a  conference  until  today,  shortly  before  lunch. 
In  the  limited  time  at  our  disposal  I  feel  that  I  have  not  had  adequate 
time  to  properly  advise  the  doctor  of  his  legal  and  constitutional  rights. 
Consequently,  I  ask  the  committee  at  this  time  to  move  the  doctor's 
appearance  over  until  tomorrow  afternoon  or  Thursday  afternoon  so 
that  I  may  have  an  opportunity  to  advise  him  properly  and  so  that 
he  will  have,  as  I  am  sure  the  committee  will  want  him  to  have,  an 
adequate  opportunity  to  consult  counsel. 

' '  Mr.  Combs :  Where  was  your  client  served  ? 

"Mr.  Marshall:  He  tells  me  he  was  served  in  the  Statler  Hotel. 

"Mr.  Combs:  In  my  room  by  me,  Dr.  Flasher? 

"Dr.  Flasher:  Yes. 

"Mr.  Combs:  You  requested  that  this  time  be  set  as  the  time  and 
place  for  your  appearance,  and  we  accommodated  the  witness,  Mr.  Mar- 
shall, to  that  extent.  We  have  also  changed  our  schedule  at  your  re- 
quest, as  I  think  you  will  of  course  substantiate,  for  two  or  three 
clients,  arranging  our  schedule  to  suit  the  convenience  of  your  clients. 

"Mr.  Marshall:  Counsel,  you  have  accommodated  several  of  my 
clients  in  their  appearance  before  the  committee  to  accommodate  their 
professional  commitment  schedule. 

"Mr.  Combs:  Yes. 

"Mr.  Marshall:  You  realize  you  began  to  serve  the  subpenas  the 
latter  part  of  last  week.  The  doctors  schedule  appointments  many 
times  a  week  ahead. 

"Mr.  Combs:  That  is  why  we  have  tried  to  accommodate  you. 

' '  Mr.  Marshall :  That  situation  applies  to  this  witness,  but  more  im- 
portantly by  reason  of  the  fact  that  he  was  only  served  Sunday,  he 
has  not  had  adequate  opportunity  to  confer  with  counsel.  There  are 
grave  and  important  questions  involving  the  career  of  the  witness,  on 
which  he  should  have  ample  time  to  consult  counsel.  I  don't  feel  that 
I  have  been  able  to  adequately  advise  him  of  his  rights  before  this 
committee,  which  are  matters  which  require  extended  discussion  and 
consideration.  In  all  fairness  to  this  witness  I  wish  that  the  committee 
would  not  propel  or  project  him  into  the  witness  chair  with  the  limited 


UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  141 

help,  the  insignificant  help  that  his  counsel  is  able  to  give  him  in  a  brief 
conference  over  the  lunch  table  this  noon. 

"Mr.  Combs:  Would  it  help  you  if  he  came  in  tomorrow  morning? 

' '  Chairman  Burns :  We  are  pretty  well  booked  up  for  the  afternoon. 

"Mr.  Marshall:  Later  on  in  the  morning,  perhaps  11.30? 

"Chairman  Burns:  That  is  all  right.  Your  request  will  be  granted, 
Dr.  Flasher,  to  appear  at  11.30  tomorrow  morning. 

"Mr.  Marshall:  Thank  you,  sir. 

"Mr.  Combs:  You  are  welcome.  I  would  like  to  see  you  with  your 
client  for  just  a  moment. 

"Mr.  Marshall:  You  stay  over  there  Dr.  Flasher,  while  I  talk  to  Mr. 
Combs. 

(Postponement  of  the  testimony  of  Dr.  Jack  Flasher,  M.D.) 


AMERICAN   BAR   PRESIDENT   SUPPORTS   DOCTORS 

TESTIMONY  OF  GEORGE  W.  NILSSON,  ESQ. 

"Q.  (By  Mr.  Combs)  Would  you  state  your  full  name  and  address, 
please  ? 

"A.  George  W.  Nilsson.  I  am  at  510  West  Sixth  Street,  Los  Angeles, 
California. 

"Q.  You  are  an  attorney  at  law? 

"A.  I  am. 

"Q.  Duly  licensed  and  admitted  to  the  Bar  of  the  State  of  Cali- 
fornia? 

"A.  I  am. 

"Q.  How  long  have  you  been  practicing  in  California,  Mr.  Nilsson? 

"A.  I  was  admitted  in  1923,  I  moved  over  here  in  June,  1924. 

"Q.I  take  it  you  must  be  a  member  of  the  California  State  Bar  ? 

"A.  I  am. 

"Q.  You  are  a  member  of  the  American  Bar  Association? 

"A.  Yes,  sir. 

1 '  Q.  How  long  have  you  been  a  member  of  the  American  Bar  Associ- 
ation, Mr.  Nilsson? 

"A.  Since  1919,  right  after  I  came  back  from  World  War  I. 

"Q.  Who  is  the  present  National  President  of  the  American  Bar 
Association  ? 

"A.  Loyd  Wright  of  Los  Angeles. 

"Q.  Did  Mr.  Wright  communicate  with  you  approximately  a  week 
or  10  days  ago  and  tell  you  that  he  had  talked  to  me  ? 

"A.  Yes,  sir. 

"Q.  Would  you  mind  giving  us  the  substance  of  his  conversation 
in  that  regard  with  you? 

"A.  He  asked  if  I  would  appear  here  on  his  behalf  and  make  a  state- 
ment to  this  committee. 

"Q.  On  his  behalf  as  what? 

"A.  As  President  of  the  American  Bar  Association,  and  in  my  posi- 
tion as  a  member  of  the  standing  committee  on  American  citizenship 
of  the  American  Bar  Association. 

"Q.  Have  you  ever  held  any  offices  in  the  American  Bar  Association? 

"A.  Never  an  office.  This  is  my  third  term  on  the  Standing  Com- 
mittee on  American  Citizenship.  I  have  worked  with  the  committee  since 
it  was  organized  about  1920  or  1921.  I  was  a  member  in  1929  and  again 
in  1930.  Mr.  Loyd  Wright  just  appointed  me  for  a  three-year  term. 


(142) 


UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  143 

"Q.  As  the  duly  authorized  representative  and  spokesman  for  the 
President  of  the  American  Bar  Association,  would  you  kindly  make 
the  statement  that  you  have  referred  to  ? 

"A.  Yes,  sir.  In  Article  I  of  the  Constitution  of  the  American  Bar 
Association,  the  first  objective  of  that  association  is  stated  to  be : 

<<  <  *  #  #  To  uphold  and  defend  the  Constitution  of  the  United 

States  and  to  maintain  representative  government  ;***..' 

"At  the  close  of  World  War  I  the  American  Bar  Association  realized 

the  dangers  of  Communism  and  therefore,  during  1920  or  1921,  created 

the  Committee  on  American  Citizenship.  Its  duties  are  set  forth  as 

follows : 

"  'This  committee  shall  have  jurisdiction  of  all  questions  in  the 
field  of  American  citizenship  and  of  the  American  form  of  govern- 
ment with  respect  to  public  education  and  understanding  of  both 
the  privileges  and  the  responsibilities  thereof.' 
"At  the  meeting  of  the  House  of  Delegates  of  the  American  Bar 
Association  on  September  22,  1950,  there  was  created  a  special  com- 
mittee to  study  Communism. 

' '  The  report  of  that  committee  was  presented  to  the  mid-winter  meet- 
ing of  the  House  of  Delegates  in  February,  1951,  and  after  lengthy 
debate  it  was  adopted  including  certain  resolutions  the  first  of  which 
is  as  follows : 

"  'Be  it  now  resolved,  That  the  American  Bar  Association,  pro- 
ceeding only  in  the  manner  provided  in  its  constitution  and  by- 
laws, expels  from  its  membership  any  and  every  individual  who  is 
a  member  of  the  Communist  Party  of  the  United  States,  or  who 
advocates  Marxism-Leninism,  and 

"  'Be  it  further  resolved,  That  this  resolution  be  referred  im- 
mediately by  the  president  of  the  association  to  an  appropriate 
committee  of  the  association  for  prompt  action. ' 
"The  second  resolution  contained  the  following: 

"  'Be  it  resolved,  That  Resolution  I  be  referred  to  all  state  and 
local  bar  associations  with  the  recommendation  that  they  expel 
from  their  membership  any  and  every  individual  who  is  a  member 
of  the  Communist  Party  of  the  United  States  or  who  advocates 
Marxism-Leninism . 

"  'Be  it  further  resolved,  That  a  copy  of  this  report  be  sent  to 
all  state  and  local  bar  association  in  the  United  States  for  the  infor- 
mation of  the  members  thereof.' 
1 '  The  committee  then  prepared  a  lengthy  supplement,  entitled :  Brief 
on  Communism;  Marxism-Leninism.  Its  Aims,  Purposes,  Objectives  and  Prac- 
tices, which  was  submitted  to  the  meeting  of  the  House  of  Delegates  of 
the  association,  held  September  18,  1951,  duly  adopted;  and  thereafter 
printed  and  widely  distributed. 


144  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN  CALIFORNIA 

"I  have  here  and  I  hand  you  a  copy  of  that  brief.  Later  on  that 
brief,  together  with  the  original  report  of  February,  1951,  were  bound 
into  one  volume  and'published.  I  don't  have  an  extra  copy,  but  I  will 
secure  it  for  you. 

"Mr.  Combs:  Thank  you,  sir.  May  we  keep  this  and  introduce  it  in 
evidence  ? 

' '  The  witness :  Yes,  sir. 

"Chairman  Burns:  It  will  be  admitted  as  the  committee's  exhibit 
next  in  order. 

"The  Witness:  The  printed  document  including  the  two  reports  was 
printed  and  distributed. 

"President  Loyd  Wright  asked  me  to  congratulate  the  medical  asso- 
ciation on  its  activities  to  expel  from  its  membership  any  individual 
who  is  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party,  or  who  advocates  Commu- 
nism or  follows  the  Communist  Party  line. 

"Q-  (By  Mr.  Combs)  :  Mr.  Nilsson,  I  hand  you  the  October,  1954, 
issue  of  the  Journal  of  the  State  Bar  of  California,  it  being  Volume  29, 
Nos.  4  and  5.  I  direct  your  attention  to  the  matter  which  commences  on 
page  349  and  to  the  following  pages  and  ask  if  you  will  examine  them 
briefly,  please? 

"A.  I  have  already  examined  it. 

' '  Q.  You  are  familiar  with  it  ? 

"A.  I  have  a  copy  of  it  in  my  office. 

' '  Q.  In  that  article  the  work  of  a  special  committee  of  the  California 
State  Bar  is  described  with  recommendations  concerning  members  of 
the  State  Bar  Association  who  were  found  to  be  members  of  the  Com- 
munist Party. 

"A.  Yes.  May  I  correct  that?  Instead  of  being  an  article,  it  is  a 
reprint  of  the  report  by  the  committee  to  the  Board  of  Governors  of 
the  State  Bar  of  California. 

"Q.  Thank  you.  It  advocates  a  similar  action  as  that  taken  by  the 
American  Bar  Association. 

"A.  They  advocate  the  amendment  of  our  law  under  which  the  bar 
acts  because  we  cannot  act  without  authority  and  they  are  recommend- 
ing three  amendments  to  the  section  of  the  Business  and  Professions 
Code  which  will  take  care  of  the  situation. 

' '  Q.  That  will  be  presented  to  the  Legislature  this  coming  session  ? 

"A.  Yes,  sir. 

"Mr.  Combs :  Mr.  Chairman,  I  think  this  issue  of  the  State  Bar  Journal 
should  also  be  received  in  connection  with  the  testimony  of  this  witness. 

' '  Chairman  Burns :  It  will  be  admitted. 

"Mr.  Combs:  I  think  that  is  all,  Mr.  Nilsson,  unless  some  member 
of  the  committee  has  a  question. 

' '  Chairman  Burns :  Thank  you  very  much,  Mr.  Nilsson. 


MEDICAL   SCHOOL   DEANS  TESTIFY 

TESTIMONY  OF  DEAN  WALTER  E.  McPHERSON 

''Chairman  Burns:  Would  you  give  your  name  and  address  to  the 
reporter  ? 

"The  Witness:  Walter  E.  MePherson,  M-c-P-h-e-r-s-o-n.  My  office 
address  is  312  North  Boyle,  Venice. 

"Q.  (By  Mr.  Combs)  :  You  are  a  physician  and  surgeon? 

"A.  Yes,  sir. 

"Q.  When  were  you  licensed? 

"A.  I  was  licensed  in  California  in  1924. 

"Q.  Do  you  have  any  official  position  in  any  medical  school  or  edu- 
cational institution? 

"A.  I  am  the  Dean  of  the  School  of  Medicine  at  the  College  of  Med- 
ical Evangelists. 

"Q.  Located  where? 

"A.  Part  of  the  school  is  located  at  Loma  Linda,  California,  in  San 
Bernardino  County,  and  part  of  it  is  in  Los  Angeles. 

"Q.  Are  you  affiliated  with  the  Los  Angeles  County  Medical  Asso- 
ciation ? 

"A.  Yes,  sir. 

"Q.  And  you  have  been  for  how  long? 

"A.  I  have  been  a  member  of  the  Los  Angeles  County  Medical  Asso- 
ciation since  1936. 

' '  Q.  You  and  I  had  a  telephone  conversation  sometime  ago  as  a  result 
of  a  conference  which  you  had  theretofore,  or  a  conversation,  with  the 
president  of  the  Los  Angeles  County  Medical  Association.  Is  that  not 
correct  ? 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  Dr.  Sampson? 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  You  telephoned  me  and  offered  to  come  to  this  hearing  and 
testify  concerning  the  attitude  of  your  institution  regarding  this 
problem. 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  Would  you  mind  doing  so,  please? 

"A.  To  state  it  briefly,  it  would  be  this:  that  the  philosophy  of  Com- 
munism would  be  so  completely  antagonistic  and  in  opposition  to  the 
idealism  and  to  the  principles  and  to  the  objectives  of  the  school  that 
I  represent. 


(145) 


146  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

"Q.  Do  you  have  any  opinion  individually  concerning  the  danger 
of  infiltration  by  Communist  doctors  in  the  medical  profession  ? 

"A.  I  know  relatively  little  about  it. 

"Q.  What  is  your  opinion? 

"A.  I  just  assume  from  what  I  hear  there  are  some  who  have  such 
opinions. 

"Q.  What  is  your  attitude  concerning  it? 

"A.  Would  you  state  that  again? 

"A.  Yes.  What  is  your  personal  attitude  concerning  the  alleged 
attempts  on  the  part  of  Communist  doctors  to  infiltrate  the  medical 
profession  ? 

"A.  Well,  I  think  it  would  be  detrimental  to  the  medical  profession 
to  permit  such  infiltration. 

"Q.  You  have  had  no  difficulty  in  your  medical  school  in  this  con- 
nection at  all  ? 

"A.  No,  sir. 

"Q.I  take  it  that  you  are  alert  to  see  that  no  infiltration  exists  ? 

"A.  We  would  certainly  attempt  to  prevent  it  in  every  way  possible. 

"Mr.  Combs:  That  is  all.  Do  you  have  any  questions? 

"Chairman  Burns:  Thank  you  very  much,  Dr.  McPherson,  you  may 
be  excused. 

TESTIMONY  OF  DR.  STAFFORD  L.  WARREN,  M.D. 

"Chairman  Burns:  Will  you  give  your  name  and  address  to  the 
reporter  ? 

' '  The  Witness :  I  am  Stafford  L.  Warren,  M.D. ;  my  home  address  is 
141  Tigertail,  Los  Angeles  49.  I  was  licensed  to  practice  in  this  State 
upon  graduation  in  1923.  I  have  been  away  and  returned  to  the  State 
as  Dean  of  the  School  of  Medicine,  February  1,  1947. 

"Q.  (By  Mr.  Combs)  :  Dr.  Warren,  you  have  been  Dean  of  the 
Medical  School  at  U.  C.  L.  A.  since  that  time  ? 

"A.  Yes,  sir. 

' '  Q.  And  now  are  ? 

"A.  Yes,  sir. 

"Q.  You  had  a  conversation  with  Dr.  Sampson  also? 

"A.  Yes,  sir. 

"Q.  Did  you  telephone  to  me? 

"A.  Yes,  sir. 

"Q.  Did  you  express  your  willingness,  your  desire  to  cooperate  with 
the  committee  in  coming  here  today  and  discussing  the  matters  with 
which  we  are  concerned? 

"A.  You  are  quite  right. 

"Q.  Doctor,  I  direct  your  attention  to  an  article  which  appeared  in 
the  Los  Angeles  Times  on  October  14,  1954,  page  26,  Part  1,  which  is 


UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES  IN  CALIFORNIA  147 

is  headed,  'Defense  Expert  Warns  of  Radioactive  Attack.'  The  subhead 
says,  'Accidental  Release  of  Particles  From  Subs  Could  Be  First 
Stage,  U.  C.  L.  A.  Dean  Declares.'  Have  you  read  that  article? 

"A.  Yes,  sir. 

"Q.  You  made  the  remarks  attributed  to  you  in  it? 

"A.  Somewhat  differently,  but  never  mind  because  the  content  is 
the  same. 

"Q.  Basically  it  is  accurate? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  Do  you  hold  any  position  in  connection  with  the  California 
Civilian  Defense  Agency? 

"A.  Yes,  sir.  I  am  chairman  of  the  Radiological  Safety  Services 
Advisory  Committee  to  the  Disaster  Council. 

"Q.  You  have  held  that  position  how  long? 

"A.  About  five  years. 

"Q.  Do  you  have  any  connection  with  the  national  defense  on  a 
national  level? 

"A.  Yes,  sir. 

"Q.  Advisory,  or  in  what  capacity? 

"A.  I  am  a  member  of  the  Medical  Advisory  Committee  in  the 
FCDA. 

"Q.  What  is  the  FCDA? 

"A.  Federal  Civil  Defense  Administration. 

"Q.  From  personal  observation  or  reading  or  from  any  source,  have 
you  become  aware  of  the  danger  of  infiltration  in  the  medical  profes- 
sion, or  in  any  profession  for  that  matter,  by  Communists? 

"A.  My  awareness  goes  back  to  the  Manhattan  District  program 
during  the  war  where  it  was  vital  that  portions  of  the  medical  profes- 
sion and  other  agencies  who  participated  in  the  atom  bomb  program 
be  thoroughly  documented  as  loyal  citizens  of  the  country. 

"Q.  Because  of  the  delicate  and  strategic  nature  of  the  work  they 
were  doing? 

"A.  That  is  right,  because  of  the  top  secret  nature  of  the  work. 

"Q.  Assuming,  Dean  Warren,  that  in  Southern  California  doctors 
who  are  members  of  the  Communist  Party  are,  by  the  nature  of  the 
type  of  work  with  which  they  are  entrusted,  given  access  to  emergency 
defense  plans  or  the  detection  of  radioactive  gas,  or  other  matters  of 
great  strategic  importance,  what  would  be  the  danger  to  the  country 
in  the  event  the  information  thus  received  was  relayed  to  unauthorized 
personnel  ? 

"A.  It  could  be  very  dangerous  in  two  categories.  One  would  be 
the  transferral  of  such  information  to  the  enemy,  which  would  give 
away  our  plans  for  defense.  I  consider  these  just  as  important  as  the 
military  plans  for  attack.  I  think  the  reason  is  obvious. 


148  UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

"Q.  Yes. 

"A.  The  other  is  that  in  case  of  attack  we  would  be  vulnerable  to 
sabotage  from  within  in  the  place  we  would  least  expect  it.  This  could 
be  exceedingly  harmful  and  jeopardize  the  lives  of  a  large  number  of 
our  people. 

"Q.  In  your  opinion  would  it  be  particularly  true  of  the  medical 
profession  or  legal  profession  for  that  matter,  because  of  the  statutory 
protection  given  to  communications  between  attorney  and  client  or 
physician  and  patient  ? 

"A.  Well,  I  think  the  two  professions  you  have  mentioned  have  the 
trust  of  the  people  from  almost  the  beginning  of  time  and  as  a  result, 
certain  professional  privileges  have  arisen  which  enable  the  lawyer  and 
the  doctor  to  protect  their  clients,  if  you  might  term  it  that.  If  Com- 
munists were  to  utilize  this  privilege  to  the  detriment  of  our  national 
safety,  I  think  it  would  be  exceedingly  bad. 

"Q.  Doctor,  are  you  familiar  to  any  extent  with  the  precautions 
taken  by  the  California  Civil  Defense  Authority  to  protect  itself  against 
infiltration  by  subversive  physicians,  if  any  such  attempts  have  been 
made? 

"A.  Yes,  sir. 

"Q.  Would  you  describe  what  those  are  for  us? 

"A.  The  men  who  are  on  the  Medical  and  Radiological  Defense 
Advisory  Committees  have  had  to  fill  out  forms  and  be  fingerprinted 
and  photographed.  This  material  was  subject  to  an  FBI  screening, 
although  the  major  screening  was  done  by  the  protective  forces  of  the 
State.  Also,  the  professional  members  of  the  committee  were  well 
aware  of  their  responsibilities  and  the  hazards  of  subversive  influences 
and  we  had  our  own  screening. 

"Q.  What  facilities  did  you  use  for  that  purpose? 

"A.  Perhaps  the  knowledge  some  of  us  had  about  the  records  of 
some  of  the  men  who  were  recommended  for  the  committee  members. 
Most  of  these  were  men  who  were  cleared  for  top  secret  and  secret  gov- 
ernment programs.  I  think  this  state  has  a  large  number  of  men  avail- 
able who  participated  in  these  programs  during  the  war. 

"Q.  You  are  aware,  I  take  it,  that  the  University  of  California  and 
the  other  universities  in  the  State — perhaps  not  all  of  them,  100  per- 
cent, but  the  overwhelming  majority  of  them,  the  largest  ones,  entered 
into  a  cooperative  arrangement  with  this  committee  several  years  ago 
for  the  purpose  of  protecting  the  several  institutions  against  Commu- 
nist infiltration.  Are  you  aware  of  that? 

"A.  Yes,  sir. 

' '  Q.  You  are  aware  that  this  plan  is  in  operation  at  U.  C.  L.  A.  ? 

"A.  Yes,  sir. 

"Q.  Are  you  in  accord  with  that  plan? 


UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  149 

"A.  Yes,  sir.  I  am  under  instructions,  according  to  the  Regent's 
regulation  put  into  effect  during  the  war,  not  to  employ  anyone  who 
is  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party. 

"Q.  That  directive  by  the  Regents  has  been  in  effect  ever  since? 

"A.  Yes,  sir.  I  have  followed  that  literally. 

"Q.  I  am  sure  you  have.  I  will  ask  you  the  question  we  have  asked 
the  other  witnesses.  I  think  I  overlooked  it  in  the  case  of  the  witness 
who  preceded  you. 

"Has  Dr.  McPherson  gone?  I  will  ask  the  question  now:  Are  you 
now  or  have  you  ever  been  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party,  Dean 
McPherson  ? 

"Dean  McPherson:  No,  sir. 

"Q.  (By  Mr.  Combs)  :  Have  you  ever  been  a  member  of  the  Com- 
munist Party,  Dean  Warren  ? 

"A.  No,  sir. 

"Mr.  Combs:  I  think  that  is  all  unless  there  are  any  questions  by 
members  of  the  committee. 

' '  Chairman  Burns :  That  is  all,  thank  you  very  much,  Dean  Warren. 

"Is  there  anyone  present  under  subpena?  Inasmuch  as  we  have 
excused  Dr.  Flasher  from  appearing  this  afternoon,  it  has  changed 
our  schedule.  We  tried  to  accommodate  a  busy  physician.  We  have 
nothing  further  to  come  before  us  this  afternoon.  The  committee  will 
stand  in  recess  until  9.30  a.m.  tomorrow  morning. 


COMMUNIST   FRONTS   AND   THEIR   MEMBERS 

The  next  group  of  witnesses  comprised  persons  who,  according  to 
the  committee's  information,  possessed  certain  knowledge  concerning 
the  Medical  Division  of  the  Arts,  Sciences  and  Professions  Council  or 
other  organizations  described  by  some  of  the  preceding  witnesses. 

It  will  be  noted  that  these  witnesses  were  treated  precisely  the  same 
as  those  who  had  already  testified.  They  were  asked  the  same  type  of 
general  qualifying  question.  They  were  asked  the  same  identical  ques- 
tions concerning  Communist  affiliation.  They  were  allowed  every  pos- 
sible latitude.  Many  will  undoubtedly  insist  that  the  committee  in- 
dulged these  witnesses  far  beyond  all  reason.  As  will  be  seen  from 
the  transcript  that  follows,  they  and  their  counsel  were  extended 
every  possible  courtesy  and  favor.  The  committee  suffered  through 
long  propaganda  speeches,  frequent  resorts  to  sarcastic  taunts  and 
cheap  theatrics — all  without  objection. 

We  believe  this  record  speaks  for  itself;  so  clearly,  so  eloquently,  in 
such  unmistakable  terms  that  its  implications  cannot  possibly  be  lost 
to  those  readers  who  approach  the  subject  without  prejudice.  Some  of 
the  witnesses  in  this  category,  characterized  by  Dr.  Thomas  L.  Perry, 
bad  been  mentioned  by  others  as  having  participated  in  so-called  left- 
wing  meetings.  Every  opportunity  was  given  each  witness  to  declare 
hi?  attitude  toward  Communism  and  to  state,  as  had  the  witnesses 
who  preceded  them,  that  they  were  not  members  of  the  Communist 
Party.  Their  responses  and  their  attitudes  must  speak  for  themselves. 

We  have  already  discussed  the  Fifth  Amendment  to  the  Federal 
Constitution  at  some  length  in  our  1953  report.  Since  the  publication 
of  that  report,  our  courts,  both  those  of  California  as  well  as  the 
federal  tribunals,  have  given  the  added  strength  of  judicial  opinion 
to  the  views  we  then  expressed.  To  invoke  the  protection  of  the  Fifth 
Amendment  is  to  admit  a  consciousness  of  possible  guilt.  No  one  is 
entitled  to  invoke  it  because  he  does  not  wish  to  answer  for  personal 
scruples,  because  of  matters  of  principle,  or  merely  because  he  wishes 
to  protect  others.  He  must  be  sincerely  convinced  that  a  truthful 
answer  or  answers  will  subject  him  to  a  criminal  prosecution. 

Up  to  this  point  in  the  hearing  not  one  of  the  witnesses  invoked  the 
Fifth  Amendment — and  the  reason  is  plain.  None  of  them  were  Com- 
munists. None  had  been  affiliated  with  Communist  front  organizations. 
None  of  them  had,  by  individual  freedom  of  choice,  pursued  a  delib- 
erate course  of  conduct  that  would  make  them  afraid  to  answer  the 
questions. 

(150) 


UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN  CALIFORNIA  151 

TESTIMONY  OF  DR.  THOMAS  L.  PERRY,  M.D. 

"Chairman  Burns:  Will  Dr.  Pony  please  come  forward?  Is  your 
client  ready,  Mr.  Marshall? 

"Mr.  Marshall:  Yes,  Senator.  I  don't  like  to  be  fussy  about  details, 
but  as  the  Senator  is  aware,  there  probably  will  be  occasions  when  my 
client  will  wish  to  consult  with  me.  I  would  like  the  record  to  show  that 
the  counsel  table  is  immediately  next  to  the  bench  where  the  committee 
is  sitting,  and  the  witness  will  be  sitting  within  a  couple  of  feet  of  the 
committee  with  the  sound  amplifier  and  I  am  much  apprehensive  that  it 
will  interfere  with  our  ability  to  consult  quickly  and  effectively.  May  I 
suggest  that  some  other  arrangement  be  made  so  that  we  can  consult 
better  as  we  go  along.  I  suggest  that  the  table  be  moved  down  to  the 
lower  level. 

"Chairman  Burns:  I  don't  think  that  is  practical.  (Short  interrup- 
tion while  the  witness  stand  is  moved  to  accommodate  the  witness  and 
his  counsel.) 

"Q.   (By  Mr.  Combs)  :  Dr.  Perry,  have  you  been  sworn? 

"A.  Yes,  I  have. 

"Q.  Did  you  give  the  reporter  your  residence  and  professional  ad- 
dress ? 

"A.  No,  I  haven't  yet,  do  you  want  me  to  now? 

"Q.  "Will  you  do  so,  please. 

"A.  My  name  is  Thomas  L.  Perry,  M.D. ;  my  office  address  is  212 
South  Gale  Drive,  Beverly  Hills.  My  residence  is  11831  Chaparal  Street, 
Los  Angeles. 

"Q.  You  are  a  licensed  physician  and  surgeon?  You  have  practiced 
your  profession  in  California  for  a  number  of  years  ? 

"A.  Yes,  I  have. 

"Q.  When  were  you  licensed,  Dr.  Perry? 

"A.  I  was  licensed  in  California  in  1946  as  I  recall.  I  had  my  medi- 
cal training  actually  in  two  places.  I  started  at  the  University  of  Oxford 
Medical  School  at  England.  I  was  a  Rhodes  Scholar  there.  I  completed 
my  medical  training  at  the  Harvard  Medical  School.  I  received  my 
medical  degree  in  1942.  I  have  had  considerable  advanced  training 
since  then.  I  was  first  intern  in  medicine  at  the  Roosevelt  Hospital  in 
New  York  City.  I  practiced  medicine  for  three  years  in  the  Army.  I 
saw  two  years  active  service  in  combat  in  the  3d  Army  in  France  and 
Germany.  After  the  war  I  had  15  months  pediatric  training  at  the  New 
York  Hospital  in  New  York  City.  I  was  later  pediatric  resident  and 
later  pediatric  fellow  at  the  Los  Angeles  Children's  Hospital. 

"Q.  Pediatrics  is  your  field? 

"A.  I  am  a  diplomate  of  the  American  Board  of  Pediatrics.  I  have 
published  a  number  of  scientific  papers  on  pediatric  subjects. 


152  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

"Q.  You  received  a  telephone  message  that  came  for  you  a  little 
earlier  ? 

"A.  I  received  it  about  30  seconds  before  this  session  began.  I  had 
no  chance  to  call. 

"Q.  I  wanted  to  make  sure  you  got  it. 

"A.  Thank  you. 

"Q.  Your  counsel  requested  in  view  of  the  message  that  you  be 
called  out  of  order  and  put  on  as  the  first  witness,  so  you  are. 

"A.  I  see. 

"Q.  Dr.  Perry,  did  you  ever  hear  of  an  organization  known  as  the 
Association  of  Internes  and  Medical  Students  ? 

"A.  Mr.  Combs  and  Senators:  I  think  in  answering  that  question  I 
would  have  to  preface  my  remarks  by  saying  that  I  respectfully  feel 
that  this  is  the  kind  of  question  which  should  not  be  asked  of  me  or 
other  witnesses.  Actually  the  effect  of  this  question  is  to  instill  a  reign 
of  terror  in  the  medical  profession  to  frighten  doctors  out  of  what  they 
think,  of  having  any  independence  of  view.  I  think  this  is  the  sort  of 
question  that  has  been  asked  in  the  various  McCarthy  hearings  taking 
place  throughout  the  Country. 

"As  an  American  of  old  standing,  because  my  people  have  been  in 
this  country  a  long  time,  and  I  was  brought  up  in  the  traditions  of  Jef- 
ferson, Lincoln  and  Franklin  Roosevelt,  I  believe  that  it  is  terribly  im- 
portant that  political  freedoms,  the  right  of  free  speech,  and  freedom 
of  thought,  the  right  to  say  what  you  think  and  talk  to  other  people  and 
associate  with  people,  that  it  is  terribly  important  and  I  can't  be  a 
party  to  any  attempt  to  destroy  these  political  freedoms  in  America 
with  its  Democratic  traditions.  I  spent  much  time  in  the  Army  fighting 
Nazis.  I  will  be  the  last  person  in  the  world  to  cooperate  in  any  way 
with  any  attempt  to  encourage  Nazi  methods  in  America.  I  think  we 
have  gone  too  far  in  that  direction  already.  This  would  be  one  of  the 
grounds  for  my  refusal  to  answer  such  question. 

"The  second  ground  is  this.  I  feel  that  this  question  actually  is  an 
invasion  of  my  right  to  speak  and  my  right  to  be  silent,  of  my  right  to 
freely  associate  with  persons  or  organizations,  or  not  to  associate  with 
persons  or  organizations.  This  right  has  been  established  for  me,  for 
everybody  in  this  room,  and  all  American  citizens  through  great  strug- 
gle. It  is  contained  in  the  First  Amendment  to  the  Bill  of  Rights  and  in 
Article  I,  Section  9  of  the  Constitution  of  the  State  of  California.  I 
would  certainly  feel  myself  disloyal  to  the  traditions  of  America  if  I  did 
not  claim  the  privileges  of  these  provisions  of  the  Federal  and  State 
Constitutions. 

"In  addition  to  that,  I  think  this  question  is  designed  to  submit  me 
to  the  danger  of  an  unwarranted  and  entirely  false  prosecution  of  an 
alleged  violation  of  federal  or  state  laws.  I  would  certainly  also  rely 


UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  153 

on  that  provision  which  has  long  existed  in  English  law  and  in  Ameri- 
can law  which  was  designed  specifically  for  the  protection  of  people 
who  are  innocent  and  which  in  no  way  implies  guilt  of  any  sort,  namely, 
the  provision  that  no  person  can  be  forced  to  be  a  witness  aginst  him- 
self, which  is  contained  in  the  Fifth  Amendment  to  the  Bill  of  Eights 
and  in  Article  I,  Section  13,  of  the  Constitution  of  this  State. 

"I  think  particularly  in  a  week  like  this,  which  I  think  is  Bill  of 
Rights  week,  that  every  person  has  a  special  obligation  to  defend  these 
sections  of  our  State  and  Federal  Constitutions  which  are  designed  to 
preserve  the  liberty  for  which  our  ancestors  in  the  Revolutionary  "War 
fought. 

"These  are  among  the  reasons  that  I  do  not  feel  that  I  can  answer 
your  question,  and  I  respectfully  decline  to  answer  it  for  these  reasons. 

"My  attorney  advises  me  that  I  have  additional  grounds  for  a  refusal 
to  answer  this  question.  Of  course,  I  am  not  a  lawyer  and  I  am  not  very 
familiar  with  these  proceedings. 

"Q.  You  have  a  competent  attorney. 

"A.  I  certainly  do  and  I  am  glad  to  have  him  here.  I  would  like  to 
give  you  additional  reasons  because  I  think  they  are  important.  I  think 
this  question  is  an  attempt  to  deprive  me  of  my  rights  to  earn  a  liveli- 
hood, and  my  liberty  and  property,  without  due  process  of  law,  to  deny 
me  equal  protection  of  the  laws.  It  is  contrary  to  the  Fourteenth  Amend- 
ment to  the  Bill  of  Rights,  and  to  Article  I,  Section  13  of  the  Constitu- 
tion of  this  State. 

"I  want  to  emphasize  the  attempt  to  deprive  me  of  my  livelihood.  I 
was  called  a  couple  of  years  ago  before  the  House  Un-American  Activi- 
ties Committee.  I  understand  that  the  intent  of  that  committee  and  one 
of  the  intents  of  this  committee  is  to  deprive  any  doctor  who  is  a  person 
of  principle,  who  stands  up  for  what  he  believes  and  says  what  he  be- 
lieves to  be  true,  who  tries  hard  to  bring  good  health  to  the  people  of  the 
community,  it  is  an  attempt  to  deprive  him  of  his  livelihood.  As  a  result 
of  my  refusal  to  give  up  the  constitutional  rights  when  called  before  a 
like  un-American  activities  committee  two  years  ago,  I  was  fired  from 
the  staff  of  the  Children 's  Hospital  in  Los  Angeles.  I  had  been  the  lead- 
ing pediatrician  there  for  six  years,  and  very  active.  The  attempt  was 
to  deprive  me  of  my  livelihood.  I  was  not  hurt  so  much  as  my  patients.  I 
was  treating  children  with  tuberculosis,  the  charity  cases  at  the  hospital. 
For  six  years  I  have  been  engaged  in  active  research  in  the  treatment 
of  tuberculosis  in  children.  "When  I  was  discharged  from  the  Children 's 
Hospital  the  special  tuberculosis  clinic  was  closed  down.  Tuberculosis 
research  was  stopped.  Charity  patients  for  whom  I  cared  were  told  that 
'Dr.  Perry  is  no  longer  here.  Nobody  is  interested  in  you  folks.  Go  find  a 
doctor  at  some  other  hospital  wherever  you  can. '  I  think  it  is  extremely 


154  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

bad  that  these  people  were  hurt.  Actually,  the  health  of  the  people  is 
being  hurt  by  investigations  like  this.  The  health  of  the  people  is  being 
hurt  by  what  a  few  leaders  of  the  county  medical  society,  who  certainly 
do  not  represent  the  majority  of  the  members  of  the  county  society  in 
what  they  are  doing,  they  are  actually  lessening  the  quality  of  medical 
care  that  comes  to  the  people  in  Los  Angeles.  This  community  happens 
to  have  a  lot  of  tuberculosis.  Tuberculosis  can  be  a  very  serious  disease 
in  children.  I  think  it  is  disgraceful  that  my  services,  which  were  given 
free,  without  any  charge,  are  denied  to  people  simply  because  I  am  a 
man  of  principle,  and  I  will  not  participate  in  any  attempt  to  destroy 
the  Constitution.  This  is  an  enlargement  of  this  particular  provision. 

"Also  I  would  like  to  state  several  grounds  which  my  attorney  calls 
attention  to.  First  of  all,  that  this  committee  sits  without  lawful  au- 
thority and  it  has  exceeded  its  valid  powers  in  asking  the  type  of  ques- 
tions it  has  been  asking  here  the  past  few  days. 

"It  is  my  opinion  this  inquisition  is  the  result  of  complicity  between 
the  federal  agencies  and  this  committee  to  deprive  me  of  constitutional 
rights  under  the  Fifth  Amendment  and  to  compel  me  to  expose  myself 
to  false  prosecution  of  alleged  violation  of  the  law. 

' '  Finally,  the  question  has  no  materiality  or  pertinency  to  any  lawful 
power  of  the  committee. 

"These  are  among  my  reasons  for  refusing  to  answer  this  question. 

"My  attorney  points  out  additional  grounds.  I  did  not  realize  how 
complicated  the  law  is. 

"Also  I  refuse  to  answer  the  question  because  I  feel  this  hearing  is 
being  conducted  solely  in  the  interests  of  and  at  the  request  of  a  pri- 
vate, nongovernmental  group  or  organization,  namely,  a  small  clique — 
not  the  whole,  but  a  small  clique  of  the  leadership  of  the  Los  Angeles 
County  Medical  Society  for  particular  and  peculiar  purposes  of  this 
small  leadership  of  the  Los  Angeles  County  Medical  Society  to  establish 
a  criterion  for  membership  in  the  county  society  and  for  the  purpose 
of  laying  the  ground  work  for  legislation  to  be  introduced  in  Sacra- 
mento after  the  first  of  the  year. 

' '  From  reading  the  papers  I  understand  that  the  Los  Angeles  County 
Medical  Society  leadership,  and  certain  people  in  the  California  State 
Medical  Association,  plan  to  introduce  a  bill  in  the  Legislature,  to  deny 
the  right  to  practice  to  any  doctor  who  stands  up  for  his  constitutional 
rights  before  a  committee  such  as  this,  or  in  any  way  participates  in  ac- 
tivities or  holds  beliefs  which  are  counter  to  those  of  this  little  clique 
on  the  county  medical  society.  I  think  it  is  important  to  point  this 
out  to  you  Senators,  because  the  effect  of  any  such  legislation  which 
would  substitute  political  conformity  for  professional  competence  as 
the  main  basis  for  the  right  to  practice  medicine  can  only  harm  people 
in  the  community.  As  soon  as  a  doctor  has  to  agree  with  the  beliefs 


UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  155 

of  the  right  wing  reactionary,  pro-Tenney,  Gerald  L.  K.  Smith  group 
in  the  county  medical  society,  and  your  training  and  excellence  and 
devotion  to  patients  and  ability  to  cure  and  prevent  diseases  is  not 
important,  then  inevitably  the  quality  of  medical  care  that  people  in 
this  community  get  will  decrease.  You  just  can't  have  good  doctors  if 
they  first  have  to  have  political  conformity  and  ability  is  secondary. 

1 ' 1  think  the  health  of  the  people  in  Los  Angeles  and  throughout  the 
State  is  extremely  important.  As  a  physician  I  feel  I  have  a  real  moral 
obligation  to  my  patients  and  the  people  in  the  community  to  do  every- 
thing possible  to  improve  the  health  of  the  people  in  Los  Angeles.  I 
would  argue  very,  very  strongly  against  such  legislation  and  against 
this  attempt  to  lay  the  groundwork  for  such  legislation. 

' '  Finally,  my  attorney  points  out  that  this  action  of  the  Los  Angeles 
County  Medical  Society  in  calling  your  committee  to  Los  Angeles  and 
telling  you  who  they  want  called  as  witnesses  is  in  violation  of  the 
Sherman-Clayton  Act. 

"Q.  Is  that  all? 

"A.  I  am  afraid  it  was  a  long-winded  answer,  but  sometimes  I  am 
long  winded  with  my  patients. 

"Q.  I  didn't  mean  to  infer  that  you  were  long  winded. 

' '  A.  Those  are  my  grounds. 

"Q.  Those  are  your  reasons? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  Included  in  them,  of  course,  is  your  invoking  of  the  Fifth 
Amendment  to  the  Constitution  of  the  United  States  ? 

"A.  I  would  like  to  re-emphasize  the  manner  in  which  I  invoked  the 
amendment. 

"Q.  You  have  already  answered  the  question.  If  you  wish  to  invoke 
it,  all  right. 

"A.  I  would  like  to  say,  Mr.  Combs,  it  is  important  for  people  to 
understand  the  use  of  the  Fifth  Amendment  in  no  way  implies  guilt, 
that  this  amendment  was  originated  in  English  law  as  a  result  of 
religious  persecution  which  took  place  in  Europe  in  the  Middle  Ages, 
to  protect  innocent  people,  and  the  use  of  the  Fifth  Amendment  to  not 
bear  witness  against  one's  self  is  an  important  part  of  our  law  and 
rights,  and  the  use  of  this  is  the  thing  which  a  person  who  is  innocent 
does  to  protect  himself.  I  know  very  well  I  am  thoroughly  innocent  of 
any  crime.  I  know  that  it  is  my  obligation  as  a  patriotic  citizen  to  bring 
out  the  facts  that  the  Fifth  Amendment  is  not  something  that  guilty 
people  hide  behind,  but  is  something  that  innocent  people  use  for  their 
protection  and  the  protection  of  everybody  else  in  the  community. 

"Q.  Then  you  do  invoke  the  Fifth  Amendment? 

"A.  I  certainly  do. 


156  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

"Q.  You  referred  to  an  appearance  before  the  House  Committee  on 
Un-American  Activities.  Do  you  recall  you  were  there  identified  by 
one  of  the  witnesses  as  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party? 

' '  A.  I  think  my  answer  to  that  question,  Mr.  Combs,  that  the  record 
of  those  hearings — and  you  can  get  a  transcript  by  writing  to  the  Fed- 
deral  Government — would  stand. 

"Q.  We  have  already  done  that,  Dr.  Perry.  Mr.  Marshall,  for  the 
sake  of  your  client  in  the  event  he  is  anxious  to  leave  and  I  might  add 
for  the  sake  of  the  committee  also  in  the  interests  of  time,  may  we  have 
a  stipulation  that  in  the  event  your  client  is  asked  questions  concern- 
ing his  affiliation  with  or  attendance  at  meetings  of  organizations  that 
have  been  characterized  as  subversive  by  either  the  federal  agencies  of 
the  Federal  Government,  or  agencies  of  the  State  Government,  that  his 
objections  which  have  just  been  placed  in  the  record  will  be  deemed 
applicable  to  each  and  all  of  such  questions? 

' '  Mr.  Marshall :  The  doctor  will  answer  your  inquiry. 

"The  Witness:  I  would  rather  answer  or  state  my  grounds  on  indi- 
vidual questions  rather  than  making  such  a  stipulation. 

' '  Mr.  Combs :  You  are  in  no  hurry  ? 

"A.  The  call  has  been  made.  It  was  a  patient  and  another  doctor 
will  take  care  of  it. 

"Q.  Then  we  have  lots  of  time? 

"A.  Surely. 

1 '  Chairman  Burns :  Mr.  Combs,  I  would  like  the  reporter  to  read 
back  the  last  question  that  was  asked.  I  think  it  was  did  he  ever  hear 
of  the  Association  of  Internes  and  Medical  Students. 

u  (Whereupon  the  question  referred  to  was  read  by  the  reporter.) 

' '  Chairman  Burns :  In  that  question,  doctor,  which  is  merely  a  ques- 
tion as  to  something  which  you  may  or  may  not  have  heard  of,  do  you 
believe  that  in  answering  it  yes  or  no  it  will  incriminate  you  in  any 
way? 

"The  Witness:  Senator  Burns,  I  think  I  recall  a  similar  type  of 
question  two  years  ago  when  I  was  called  before  the  House  Committee 
on  Un-American  Activities.  It  is  my  understanding  that  the  intent  and 
the  meaning  of  the  Fifth  Amendment,  or  that  provision  of  the  Fifth 
Amendment  which  provides  that  a  person  may  not  be  forced  to  bear 
witness  against  himself,  and  that  use  of  the  privilege  against  self 
incrimination  in  no  way  implies  guilt,  that  the  sense  of  this  amend- 
ment requires  that  I  not  answer  any  such  question,  and  to  answer  such 
a  question  would  of  itself  violate  the  rights  against  self  incrimination 
which  are  given  me  by  this  amendment  to  the  Bill  of  Rights. 

' '  Chairman  Burns :  The  chair  rules  that  you  are  wrong,  that  we  do 
not  hold  such  views,  and  the  reasons  stated  by  you  in  refusing  to  answer 
such  questions  are  insufficient.  The  chair  instructs  you  to  answer  this 


UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN  CALIFORNIA  157 

question.  Did  you  ever  hear  of  an  organization  known  as  the  Associa- 
tion of  Internes  and  Medical  Students  f 

' '  Mr.  Marshall :  Senator  Burns,  will  it  be  stipulated  that  the  answer 
which  this  witness  gave  to  this  question  when  it  was  first  propounded 
may  be  deemed  to  be  his  answer  to  the  questions  now  propounded  to 
him  by  you  and  by  this  reference  it  will  be  deemed  to  be  incorporated 
in  toto. 

"Chairman  Burns:  So  stipulated.  Go  ahead. 

"Mr.  Combs:  The  record  will  show  that  the  stipulation  has  been 
made,  is  that  correct? 

"Chairman  Burns:  That  is  correct. 

"Mr.  Marshall:  Do  you  want  to  add  something  else,  doctor? 

' '  Mr.  Combs :  Is  that  satisfactory  to  you,  Dr.  Perry  ? 

"The  Witness:  Yes,  it  is. 

' '  Chairman  Burns :  You  also  further  stipulate,  Mr.  Marshall,  in  the 
event  questions  are  propounded  to  the  witness  and  he  refuses  to  answer 
them  that  the  same  instructions  and  the  same  reasons  stand,  that  he 
has  been  given  an  instruction  to  answer  them  for  the  reasons  stated  and 
that  the  excuses  he  furnishes  are  insufficient  in  the  judgment  of  the 
committee  ? 

"Mr.  Marshall:  Let's  see  if  I  understand  it.  Are  you  asking  me  to 
stipulate,  Senator,  that  in  each  case  where  the  witness  claims  his  con- 
stitutional privilege  that  it  will  be  deemed  in  each  of  those  instances 
that  the  committee  has  instructed  him  to  answer  ?  We  will  so  stipulate. 

"Mr.  Combs:  And  his  reasons  for  refusing  to  answer  are  the  same 
as  heretofore  given. 

' '  Mr.  Marshall :  Yes.  And  that  his  reasons  for  refusing  to  answer  and 
his  grounds  of  privilege  will  be  deemed  to  have  been  incorporated  by 
him  by  this  reference  in  each  instance. 

"Mr.  Combs:  So  stipulated.  Is  that  satisfactory  to  you,  Dr.  Perry? 

' '  Dr.  Perry :  These  stipulations  are  confusing  to  a  medical  man,  but 
if  it  is  all  right  with  my  attorney  who  happens  to  be  a  very  good  man  it 
is  all  right  with  me. 

"Q.  (By  Mr.  Combs)  :  Have  you  ever  been  a  member  of  the  Commu- 
nist Party  or  the  Communist  Political  Association? 

"A.  My  answer  to  this  question  is  as  follows:  I  would  refuse  to 
answer  the  question  on  the  grounds  as  follows :  first  of  all  that  this  is  a 
typical  question  for  a  McCarthyite  committee  like  yours  to  ask  in  order 
to  strike  terror  into  the  American  people,  to  scare  the  American  people 
from  saying  what  they  think  about  issues,  from  talking  freely  with 
their  neighbors,  from  voting  the  way  they  want.  As  a  patriotic  Amer- 
ican citizen  I  feel  it  is  absolutely  incumbent  upon  me  to  oppose  every 
attempt  to  bring  Fascism  into  this  country,  which  is  the  objective  result 


158  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN  CALIFORNIA 

of  questions  like  this  asked  by  your  committee  and  other  committees, 
and  its  inevitable  result,  unless  people  fight  against  it,  of  an  inquisi- 
tion such  as  you  are  holding  here  in  Los  Angeles  this  week. 

"I  believe  very,  very  strongly  in  the  democratic  traditions  of 
America.  I  am  sworn  in  my  own  conscience  to  uphold  that.  I  will  never 
do  anything  to  destroy  the  things  which  my  ancestors  fought  for  in  this 
country.  I  want  to  see  a  country  which  was  founded  by  the  ideals  of 
Tom  Paine,  by  Abraham  Lincoln  and  by  Franklin  D.  Roosevelt.  I  don't 
want  to  see  an  America  that  is  a  replica  of  Nazi  Germany.  I  am 
not  cooperating  with  your  committee  or  any  other  committee  which 
attempts  to  impose  Fascism  in  America.  I  think  this  is  the  intent  of 
committees  like  yours.  This  is  the  primary  moral  reason  for  which  I  will 
not  answer  this  question  or  any  other  question  of  a  similar  nature. 

"Secondly,  I  would  like  to  state  this  question  violates  my  rights  of 
freedom  to  speak,  freedom  to  be  silent,  freedom  to  associate  with  people 
and  organizations,  or  not  to  associate  with  people  or  organizations, 
which  is  contained  in  the  First  Amendment  to  the  Bill  of  Rights,  and  is 
contained  in  Article  I,  Section  9,  of  the  California  State  Constitution. 

"I  will  further  refuse  to  answer  the  question  because  it  is  a  very 
deliberate  attempt  to  expose  me  to  the  danger  of  a  groundless  and  false 
prosecution  for  alleged  violation  of  federal  or  state  law.  Consequently 
I  avail  myself  of  the  constitutional  right  intended  for  the  protection  of 
the  innocent.  I  will  emphasize  again  'intended  for.'  It  was  intended 
for  the  protection  of  the  innocent  and  from  whose  use  no  inference  at  all 
of  guilt  can  be  drawn. 

' '  I  now  claim  the  privilege  contained  in  the  Fifth  Amendment  of  the 
Bill  of  Rights,  which  provides  that  you  cannot  compel  me  to  be  a  wit- 
ness against  myself,  and  of  the  similar  provision  contained  in  Article 
I,  Section  13  of  the  Constitution  of  this  State. 

"I  tried  to  make  this  clear  in  the  beginning.  It  is  important  for 
people  to  realize — I  don't  mean  to  drag  out,  to  draw  out  these  pro- 
ceedings, but  I  believe  the  people  in  this  room,  the  people  who  may  read 
about  these  proceedings  in  the  press,  should  be  reminded  of  the  provi- 
sions in  the  Bill  of  Rights.  They  are  our  history,  they  are  English 
history.  Many  countries  in  Europe  have  struggled  to  provide  these 
privileges  so  that  there  will  be  religious  and  political  freedom  in  our 
Country,  and  the  rights  of  the  people  can  be  protected.  I  certainly  will 
not  go  along  with  you  Senators  in  any  attempt  at  all  to  destroy  these 
privileges.  I  think  it  would  be  very  much  better  if  you  Senators  were 
using  your  time  to  investigate  something  else. 

"Mr.  Combs:  Mr.  Marshal,  we  did  not  object  to  your  client  giving 
his  reasons  for  refusing  to  answer  questions  which  were  pertinent,  but 
we  ask  you  to  admonish  him.  We  did  not  ask  him  to  advise  the  com- 


UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN  CALIFORNIA  159 

mittee  how  to  conduct  its  affairs,  which  borders  a  little  on  the  imperti- 
nent. This  portion  of  his  answer  is  completely  nonresponsive.  While  we 
are  willing  to  let  him  give  any  legitimate  reasons  for  refusing  to  answer 
a  question,  we  do  not  wish  him  to  embark  on  a  lecture  to  the  committee 
as  to  how  to  conduct  its  affairs.  The  committee  has  been  conducting 
these  hearings  for  almost  16  years  and  should  know  something  about 
how  they  are  operated. 

' '  Mr.  Marshall :  The  witness  realizes  that  he  is  here  today  in  the  role 
of  a  citizen  called  upon  by  this  committee  to  come  here  and  answer 
questions.  He  felt,  no  doubt,  that  an  additional  reason  for  his  position 
is  that  the  the  time  of  the  committee  could  better  be  given  to  other 
important  matters. 

"Mr.  Combs:  I  think  that  is  a  decision  for  the  committee  to  make 
and  not  this  witness. 

"Q.  Have  you  concluded,  Dr.  Perry? 

' '  A.  Yes,  I  have  concluded  my  answer  to  the  question. 

"Q.  Have  you  ever  been  a  member  of  the  Los  Angeles  County  Medi- 
cal Association  ? 

' '  A.  No,  I  have  not  been  a  member  of  the  Los  Angeles  County  Medi- 
cal Association. 

"  Q.  You  have  no  hesitancy  in  answering  that  question  ? 

"A.  No,  I  don't.  I  applied  for  membership  several  years  ago.  I  hap- 
pen to  have  extremely  excellent  professional  qualifications.  I  have  all 
of  the  high  medical  qualifications  required  for  membership.  My  appli- 
cation was  turned  down  after 

"  Q.  When  was  it  turned  down  ? 

"A.  It  was  turned  down  approximately  in  the  summer  of  1953,  after 
a  delay  of  some  18  months  in  processing  my  application.  I  was  given 
no  reason  for  being  turned  down.  All  letters  sent  by  me  to  the  County 
Medical  Society  asking  for  a  reason  for  refusal  have  never  been  given 
the  courtesy  of  a  reply. 

"Q.  Have  you  ever  been  a  member  of  an  organization  known  as  the 
Civil  Rights  Congress  ? 

"A.  My  answer  to  that  question,  Mr.  Combs,  would  be  that  I  decline 
to  answer  the  question  for  the  grounds  previously  stated.  I  am  not 
taking  the  time  by  going  into  that.  I  think  that  is  sufficiently  clear. 

"Q.  Thank  you.  Have  you  ever  been  a  member  of  the  Medical  Divi- 
sion of  the  Arts,  Sciences  and  Professions  Council? 

"A.  I  would  adopt  as  my  answer  the  grounds  previously  stated  and 
decline  to  answer  this  question. 

"Q.  Have  you  ever  been  a  member  of  the  Young  Communist  League? 

"A.  I  would  give  you  the  same  declination  to  answer  on  the  grounds 
previously  stated. 


160  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN  CALIFORNIA 

"Q.  Is  it  not  a  fact  that  while  a  student  at  the  University  of  Cali- 
fornia you  were  active  in,  or  an  officer  of  an  organization  known  as  the 
Association  of  Internes  and  Medical  Students? 

"A.  I  am  afraid  that  some  of  your  sleuths  have  given  you  incorrect 
information,  Mr.  Combs.  I  have  never  been  a  student  at  the  University 
of  Southern  California.  I  was  a  member  of  the  faculty  at  the  University 
of  Southern  California. 

' '  Q.  What  year  ? 

"A.I  was  a  member  of  the  faculty — you  will  have  to  excuse  my  not 
remembering  the  exact  dates. 

"Q.  Approximately? 

"A.  Approximately  1948  to  1952.  That  is  very  rough.  I  have  never 
been  a  student  there.  I  was  a  student  at  the  Harvard  Medical  School. 

"I  might  add  incidentally  as  a  result  of  the  work  of  this  top  clique 
of  the  County  Medical  Society,  I  was  discharged  from  the  faculty  of  the 
University  of  Southern  California  without  reason  because  the  dean 
thanked  me  for  the  extremely  good  service  I  had  given  and  said  I  was 
one  of  the  finest  teachers  that  they  had. 

"Q.  Dean  Raulston? 

"A.  That  is  right.  He  was  sorry  to  lose  me.  I  had  been  teaching 
medical  students  pediatrics.  I  enjoyed  it  and  had  a  lot  to  offer  them. 
The  effect  of  an  inquisition  like  this  is  apparently  to  decrease  the 
standards  of  medical  education  in  Los  Angeles.  As  long  as  the  faculties 
of  our  medical  schools  like  U.  S.  C.  and  U.  C.  L.  A.  School  of  Medicine 
— there  is  a  reign  of  terror  and  nobody  dares  express  medical  views 
they  think,  and  they  are  not  likely  to  get  as  good  a  medical  education 
as  I  did  at  Harvard,  which  has  a  good  medical  tradition.  In  the  U.  C.  L. 
A.  Medical  School,  whose  Dean  testified  here  yesterday,  I  believe  this 
reign  of  terror  is  likely  to  inhibit  the  quality  of  medical  research.  In  a 
community  with  four  or  five  million  people  we  need  good  medical 
schools  where  citizens  can  be  taught  well  to  be  excellent  doctors  and 
where  good  research  is  turned  out.  One  of  the  great  lacks  in  Los 
Angeles  is  that  our  medical  schools  are  not  having  a  better  program 
and  turning  out  more  research  men  of  the  type  of  good  medical  re- 
search that  is  done  outside  of  Los  Angeles.  Our  community  needs  to 
be  producing  real  advance  and  medical  knowledge  to  help  the  people. 
By  dismissal  from  the  faculty  of  the  University  of  Southern  Califor- 
nia for  being  a  man  of  principle  is  exactly  the  sort  of  thing  which  will 
result  in  less  well  qualified  doctors  being  turned  out  by  U.  S.  C.  Med- 
ical School.  I  would  like  to  see  good  doctors  turned  out  by  all  medical 
schools  in  Los  Angeles. 

"Q.  Is  that  your  answer  to  the  question? 

"A.  "Would  you  repeat  the  question?  I  am  afraid  in  my  answer — 


UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  16] 

"  Q.  Have  you  forgotten  it  ? 

"A.  Not  that  I  have  forgotten  it,  but  I  may  have  lost  sight  of  the 
individual  words.  Unfortunately,  I  am  used  to  talking  to  mothers  and 
fathers  about  behavior  problems  of  children.  I  am  sometimes  long 
winded. 

"Q.  You  are  used  to  talking  in  other  organizations,  are  you 
not?  For  example,  at  the  membership  convention  of  the  Arts,  Sciences 
and  Professions  Council  at  Stanley  Hall,  December  2,  1950,  at  which 
you  were  a  featured  speaker? 

"A.  You  are  asking  a  couple  of  questions.  May  we  take  them  one  at 
a  time? 

"Q.  You  gave  us  a  long  winded  answer  to  the  last  question.  Now 
you  don't  remember  exactly  what  it  was. 

"A.  I  would  specifically  request  that  you  repeat  the  last  question 
and  go  on  to  the  next  one. 

"Mr.  Combs:  I  think  I  am  satisfied  with  your  answer. 

"Mr.  Marshall:  Wait  a  minute.  For  the  record,  the  witness  wants  to 
make  sure  he  claimed  his  constitutional  privilege.  We  started  out  on 
the  question :  was  this  while  you  were  a  student  at  U.  S.  C,  were  you 
a  member  of  such-and-such? 

"Mr.  Combs:  Member  of  officer  of  the  Association  of  Internes  and 
Medical  Students. 

"Mr.  Marshall:  The  witness  answered  the  question  as  to  whether  or 
not  he  was  a  student. 

' '  Mr.  Combs :  He  said  he  was  a  member  of  the  faculty. 

"Mr.  Marshall:  Yes,  he  said  he  was  a  member  of  the  faculty.  Is  the 
rest  of  the  question  still  pending? 

"Chairman  Burns:  It  has  not  been  answered. 

' '  The  Witness :  You  see,  that  is  what  I  wanted  to  know.  It  is  a  com- 
pound question. 

"Mr.  Combs:  Would  you  answer  it  now? 

"Mr.  Marshall:  Shall  we  break  it  down? 

"Mr.  Combs :  No.  I  will  reframe  it.  It  can  be  answered  very  simply. 

"Q.  While  you  were  at  U.  S.  C.  as  a  member  of  the  faculty,  or  in 
any  other  capacity,  were  you  a  member  of  an  organization  known  as 
the  Association  of  Internes  and  Medical  Students? 

"A.  I  decline  to  answer  this  question.  I  believe  you  understand  what 
these  grounds  are. 

"Q.  I  understand  perfectly. 

"A.  All  right. 

"Q.  Were  you  at  one  time  national  president  of  the  Association  of 
Internes  and  Medical  Students! 

"A.  I  would  decline  to  answer  the  question  on  the  same  grounds. 


162  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

"Q.  I  hand  you  now  what  purports  to  be  a  photostatic  copy  of  an 
article  entitled,  AIMS  at  U.  S.  C.  by  Joyce  Fielding,  Corresponding 
Editor,  it  being  entitled  'Progress  Notes.'  It  is  only  two  pages.  Will 
you  tell  me  whether  or  not  you  can  testify  from  your  own  knowledge 
if  the  material  contained  therein  is  substantially  correct? 

"A.  Mr.  Combs,  I  have  glanced  over  this  photostat  that  you  have 
handed  me.  In  my  opinion  this  is  simply  another  question,  but  for  the 
information  of  the  audience  here  it  is  a  photostat  of  an  article  about 
the  formation  of  a  chapter  of  AIMS  at  the  Southern  California  Medical 
School.  It  seems  to  me  it  is  another  question  dealing  with  an  organiza- 
tion. 

"As  I  mentioned  before,  I  feel  that  the  First  Amendment  gives  me 
the  right,  and  every  citizen  the  right,  not  to  discuss  affiliations  with 
organizations  or  individuals.  I  would  decline  to  answer  on  those 
grounds,  and  on  the  other  grounds  previously  stated. 

"Mr.  Marshall:  Mr.  Combs,  will  you  identify  the  document  for  the 
record  ? 

"Mr.  Combs :  I  did.  It  is  entitled  'Progress  Notes/  AIMS  at  U.  S.  C.  by 
Joyce  Fielding,  Corresponding  Editor. 

"Mr.  Marshall:  Thank  you. 

"Mr.  Combs:  It  is  a  page  from  a  publication  which  I  understand 
was  issued  by  AIMS.  Do  you  know  whether  or  not  that  is  true?  Was 
there  such  a  publication? 

"A.  I  think  this  is  another  modification  of  a  question  previously 
asked.  I  refuse  to  answer  on  the  grounds  previously  stated.  As  you  see, 
I  have  been  given  excellent  legal  instruction  by  my  attorney. 

' '  Chairman  Burns :  That  is  a  good  answer. 

"Mr.  Marshall:  Was  that  remark  for  the  record,  Senator? 

"Chairman  Burns:  I  will  make  it  so.  I  think  your  client  is  afraid 
to  answer  anything. 

"The  Witness:  Senator  Burns,  I  would  respectfully  like  to  say  I 
don't  think  that  this  is  a  fair  characterization  of  me.  There  are  a  lot 
of  things  I  would  like  to  talk  about.  For  instance,  one  of  the  things 
which  was  brought  out,  one  of  the  heinous  crimes  I  was  accused  of 
committing  by  one  of  the  county  medical  association  sleuths  the  other 
day  was  that  I  took  active  part  in  combating  discrimination  in  the 
hospitals  of  this  community.  I  would  be  happy  to  say  that  I  feel  that 
there  is  a  lot  of  discrimination  against  Negroes,  Mexican-Americans 
and  Jews  in  our  hospitals,  both  discrimination  against  doctors  and 
nurses  of  these  minority  groups,  but  particularly  against  patients. 
I  have  no  hesitation  in  telling  you  I  am  strongly  opposed  to  it  and  I 
think  that  every  doctor  has  a  moral  obligation  to  fight  against  such 
discrimination. 


UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  163 

' '  Chairman  Burns :  Are  you  now  on  the  staffs  of  any  hospitals  that 
practice  discrimination  ? 

• '  The  Witness :  I  think  my  answer  to  this,  Senator  Burns,  would  be : 
in  any  hospital  staff  where  I  serve,  where  discrimination  against  pa- 
tients or  doctors  comes  to  my  attention,  I  would  do  everything  in  my 
power  to  fight  against  it.  I  think  it  is  extremely  important  that  segre- 
gation of  negro  patients  apart  from  white  patients,  which  is  practiced 
in  a  number  of  the  leading  Los  Angeles  hospitals  today,  should  be 
ended.  If  the  leadership  of  the  county  medical  society  would  spend 
more  time  working  to  end  this  discrimination  I  think  they  would  be 
doing  a  real  service  to  the  community.  Discrimination  is  not  only 
entirely  out  of  tradition — 

"Chairman  Burns:  Just  a  moment,  please.  Mr.  Marshall,  I  don't  like 
to  be  rude  to  any  witness  before  this  committee.  The  question  was 
simply:  Doctor,  have  you  been  a  member  of  a  staff  of  any  hospital 
that  you  know  of  that  practices  discrimination?  The  answer  is  either 
yes  or  no.  If  you  don't  want  to  answer,  say,  'I  refuse  to  answer  on 
the  grounds  previously  stated, '  and  get  on  with  the  business. 

"Mr.  Marshall:  In  my  opinion  the  question,  with  all  due  respect  to 
you,  Senator,  would  not  be  a  question  to  which  the  privileges  would 
attach.  Moreover,  it  is  asked  in  such  a  way  as  in  my  humble  judgment 
would  call  for  an  answer  which  the  witness  must  respectfully  give  to 
you,  being  satisfied  that  you  were  in  search  of  information  on  the 
subject.  He  did  answer  the  question.  He  will  be  happy  to  give  you 
his  views  on  the  subject  of  discrimination  in  the  hospitals,  in  medical 
facilities  of  this  kind,  if  you  care  to  examine  him  further. 

' '  Charman  Burns :  I  will  say  that  I  agree  with  his  views  on  discrim- 
ination, but  that  is  not  the  question.  The  question  was  has  he  ever  been 
a  member  of  any  staff  of  any  hospital  in  Los  Angeles  which  practices 
discrimination  among  the  patients  ?  That  is  simple. 

' '  Mr.  Marshall :  That  calls  for  a  matter  of  personal  knowledge. 

■ '  Chairman  Burns :  That 's  what  I  want  to  know  about. 

"Mr.  Marshall:  Hospitals  to  which  he  was  attached  may  have  prac- 
ticed discrimination,  but  I  think  you  can  tell  from  the  tenor  of  the 
answer  of  the  witness  that  if  he  ever  came  across  any  instance  of  it 
he  would  object  most  heatedly.  He  agrees  with  you  that  discrimination 
is  wrong  and  that  segregation  in  the  care  of  persons  needing  medical 
and  hospital  facilities  in  this  community  ought  to  stop,  but  it  has  not 
stopped. 

"Chairman  Burns  :  It  still  does  not  answer  the  question.  If  he  doesn't 
want  to  answer  the  question,  he  may  say  so,  it  is  all  right.  I  am  not 
making  an  issue  out  of  it.  I  thought  we  were  going  to  have  an  instance 
or  a  specific  case  of  some  hospital  practicing  discrimination. 

"The  Witness:  I  will  give  you  an  example. 


164  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN  CALIFORNIA 

' '  Chairman  Burns :  No,  I  don 't  want  an  example. 

"The  Witness:  You  have  asked  the  question. 

' '  Chairman  Burns :  I  want  to  know  if  you  were  ever  a  member  of  any 
hospital  staff  that  you  know  of  that  practiced  discrimination?  Let's 
have  that  first. 

' '  The  Witness :  Look,  Senator  Burns,  it  seems  to  me  that  if  you  are 
interested  in  knowing  factual  information  about  hospitals  where  dis- 
criminatory practices  have  taken  place  and  are  taking  place,  I  would 
certainly  be  glad  to  give  you  the  information.  I  am  not  an  expert  on 
it.  I  know  some  of  it. 

' '  If,  on  the  other  hand,  the  purpose  of  your  question  is  to  ask  me  on 
what  hospital  staffs,  or  of  what  hospital  staffs  am  I  now  a  member,  with 
two  things  in  mind:  one,  to  bring  public  pressure  to  bear  on  these 
hospital  staffs,  or,  secondly,  with  the  intent  which  I  feel  is  obvious 
in  your  mind  of  trying  to  get  me  fired  from  additional  hospital  staffs, 
as  an  un-American  activities  committee  was  successful  in  doing,  I  can- 
not go  along  with  it. 

"If  you  are  honestly  interested  in  knowing  about  discrimination  in 
hospitals,  in  doing  something  to  end  it,  because  this  is  in  accord  with 
the  wonderful  decision  of  the  Supreme  Court  ending  segregation  in  the 
schools — it  is  necessary  for  the  health  of  all  of  us.  When  one  group 
in  the  population  is  discriminated  against  healthwise,  the  health  of  all 
people  suffer. 

' '  Chairman  Burns :  We  don 't  want  a  lecture,  Doctor,  you  are  giving 
us  a  lecture. 

"The  Witness:  If  you  are  honestly  interested  in  doing  something 
about  discrimination  I  will  be  glad  to  help  you  and  be  glad  to  give  you 
information.  If  you  are  not  honestly  interested  in  this  and  are  simply 
trying  to  find  a  way  to  blacklist  me  additionally,  how  can  I  go  along 
with  your  plans  ? 

"Chairman  Burns:  We  object  to  the  witness  sitting  in  judgment  on 
the  activities  of  the  committee.  We  are  here  to  gather  information  but 
you  don 't  want  to  give  it  to  us. 

"The  Witness:  If  you  are  interested  in  evidence  on  discrimination 
there  is  a  good  pamphlet  called  For  a  Better  Brotherhood,  which  is  a 
survey  of  discriminatory  practices  in  the  hospitals  of  Los  Angeles.  It 
includes  a  statement  about  the  case  of  Mrs.  Rambo. 

"Q.  (By  Mr.  Combs)  :  Isn't  that  entitled  Yours  for  a  Better  Brother- 
hood? 

"A.  I  think  that  is  the  correct  title.  I  haven't  read  it  for  a  number 
of  years. 

"Q.  By  whom  was  it  issued? 

"A.  I  don't  mean  to  continue  fencing  with  you,  Mr.  Combs. 


UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN  CALIFORNIA  165 

"Q.  You  opened  it  up.  I  didn't. 

"A.  I  think  that  is  a  provocative  question.  I  will  have  to  decline 
to  answer  on  the  grounds  I  have  given  to  a  number  of  other  questions. 

"Q.  I  was  sure  you  would,  Doctor.  We  have  a  copy  of  it  and  it  will 
be  testified  to  fully  by  other  witnesses  later  on. 

"A.  It  should  be  made  public.  It  is  something  the  public  should  read. 

"Q.  It  will  be  made  public  by  all  means. 

"A.  Incidentally,  I  think  Dr.  Kolodny,  who  was  a  witness  before 
you  yesterday,  testified  there  was  no  discrimination  at  the  Queen  of 
Angels  Hospital.  This  pamphlet,  according  to  my  remembrance,  con- 
tains the  case  of  Mrs.  Rambo,  who  was  segregated  and  was  very  badly 
hurt  by  the  discrimination  which  took  place  and  still,  incidentally, 
takes  place  at  the  Queen  of  Angels  Hospital.  Negro  patients  are  not 
allowed  to  be  placed  in  the  same  room  with  white  patients  at  the 
Queen  of  Angels  Hospital  today.  I  believe  there  are  other  hospitals 
where  this  goes  on.  All  of  us  should  work  to  end  that. 

' '  Chairman  Burns :  Was  Mrs.  Rambo  a  negro  ? 

"The  Witness:  Incidentally,  I  think  Dr.  Kolodny  stated  there  was 
no  discrimination.  A  suit  was  filed  by  Mrs.  Rambo  against  Queen  of 
Angels  Hospital  and  the  Queen  of  Angels  Hospital,  recognizing  that 
they  had  discriminated  and  that  they  were  practicing  discrimination, 
settled  out  of  court  for  the  statutory  minimum. 

"Q.  (By  Mr.  Combs)  :  Which  was  that? 

"A.  I  understand  that  this  statutory  minimum  is  $100  and  the 
cost  of  the  suit. 

"Q.  Do  you  have  any  personal  knowledge  of  the  Rambo  incident? 

"A.  Senators,  and  Mr.  Combs 

"Q.  The  question  was  whether  or  not  you  have  any  personal  knowl- 
edge of  the  Rambo  incident  ? 

"A.  The  answer  is  that  my  knowledge  of  the  Rambo  incident  is 
gained  from  reading  the  accounts  of  the  case;  my  attorney  informed 
me  this  morning  that  a  suit  was  pressed  by  another  attorney  in  this 
town. 

"Q.  That  is  all  hearsay  as  far  as  you  are  concerned? 

"Mr.  Marshall:  I  don't  think  the  court  record  is  hearsay,  Mr.  Combs. 

' '  Mr.  Combs :  He  testified  you  told  him. 

' '  Mr.  Marshall :  That  is  right. 

"Mr.  Combs:  That,  of  course,  is  hearsay,  isn't  it? 

"Mr.  Marshall:  Yes — it  is  kind  of  silly  hearsay. 

"Mr.  Combs:  I  think  so,  too,  I  agree  with  you. 

"Mr.  Marshall:  I  could  send  over  and  get  a  certified  copy  of  the 
proceedings  or  you  could  subpena  the  file,  why  don't  you  do  that? 


166  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN  CALIFORNIA 

It  is  Ramoo  v.  Queen  of  Angels.  Send  a  subpena  over,  they  will  bring 
the  file  over  and  it  will  show  what  I  have  stated  to  you. 

"Mr.  Combs:  My  question  was  whether  or  not  your  client  had 
any  personal  knowledge. 

"Mr.  Marshall:  He  was  not  actually  there,  he  never  gave  any  such 
impression. 

"Mr.  Combs:  I  know  he  was  not.  I  am  going  to  ask  Dr.  Perry 
about  a  series  of  meetings  with  the  dates.  It  is  completely  immaterial 
to  me,  as  long  as  you  have  enough  time,  to  say  whether  or  not  you 
want  to  go  into  these  in  great  detail  or  whether  you  invoke  the  stipula- 
tion that  has  heretofore  been  made. 

' '  Mr.  Marshall :  May  I  suggest  you  show  the  questions  to  the  witness 
if  you  have  a  long  list. 

"Mr.  Combs:  If  I  showed  the  questions  to  you — 

' '  The  "Witness :  No,  thanks. 

"Mr.  Combs:  I  have  no  such  savage  intent. 

"Mr.  Marshall:  If  you  have  a  long  list  of  meetings  and  dates  and 
lump  them  together  and  let  him  have  it  with  one  blast  we  may  save 
some  time. 

"Mr.  Combs:  I  cannot  lump  them  together,  but  in  an  effort  to  save 
time  I  will  go  down  the  list  of  10,  I  think,  Mr.  Marshall. 

"Mr.  Marshall:  Just  10? 

"Mr.  Combs:  Yes. 

' '  The  Witness :  May  I  consult  with  counsel  ? 

"Mr.  Marshall:  The  witness  agrees  with  counsel  he  should  not  be 
shotgunned. 

' '  The  Witness :  I  don 't  want  to  be  blasted  off  here. 

"Mr.  Combs:  You  are  in  no  danger. 

' '  Mr.  Marshall :  Let 's  take  the  first  question,  one  shot  at  a  time. 

' '  Mr.  Combs :  I  think  that  is  better. 

"Q.  Is  it  not  a  fact  that  on  the  second  day  of  December  in  1950 
you  were  the  featured  speaker  at  the  membership  convention  of  the 
Arts,  Sciences  and  Professions  Council  in  Los  Angeles? 

"A.  I  think  my  answer  to  that  question  would  be  that  I  decline 
to  answer  the  question  on  the  grounds  which  I  previously  stated. 

"Q.  Is  it  not  a  fact  that  on  the  twelfth  of  August,  1951,  at  9620 
Monte  Mar  Drive,  which  was  the  residence — well,  I  won't  name  him. 
Strike  the  question.  On  that  date,  were  you  not  a  speaker  at  a  meeting 
of  the  Medical  Division  of  the  Arts,  Sciences  and  Professions  Council 
at  9620  Monte  Mar  Drive  and  that  the  subject  of  your  address  was, 
'Yours  for  a  Genuine  Brotherhood?' 

"A.  I  would  decline  to  answer  the  question  on  the  grounds  pre- 
viously stated. 


UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  167 

"Q.  Which  is  the  name  of  the  publication  to  which  you  referred  here 
a  moment  ago. 

"A.  You  have  informed  me  that  this  is  the  name  of  the  pamphlet  I 
referred  to. 

"Q.  You  said,  For  a  Genuine  Brotherhood,  and  I  corrected  you  and 
said  it  was,  Yours  for  a  Genuine  Brotherhood,  and  you  said  it  was  correct. 

"A.  I  said  I  thought  it  probably  was  correct,  but  it  was  a  number  of 
years  since  I  read  the  pamphlet.  I  am  sure  you  are  more  recently 
familiar  with  it. 

"Q.  Is  it  not  a  fact  that  on  the  seventeenth  day  of  August,  1951,  at 
7410  Sunset  Boulevard,  you  spoke  before  a  meeting  of  the  Medical  Divi- 
sion of  the  Arts,  Sciences  and  Professions  Council? 

"A.  In  response  to  this  question  I  cannot  help  but  say,  Mr.  Combs, 
that  it  seems  as  if  these  leading  members  of  the  county  medical  society 
have  been  devoting  a  great  deal  of  their  time  to  counter-espionage.  If 
they  would  put  in  more  time  taking  care  of  patients  and  toward  trying 
to  take  an  active  stand  fighting  smog,  which  is  the  major  menace  to  the 
health  of  the  community,  and  toward  fighting  discrimination  as  talked 
about  before,  I  think  they  would  better  spend  their  time,  but  I  would 
refuse  to  answer  the  question  on  the  grounds  previously  stated. 

"Q.  Is  it  not  a  fact  that  on  the  twenty-fifth  day  of  February,  1952, 
you  attended  and  spoke  at  a  meeting  of  an  organization  known  as  The 
Committee  for  Medical  Freedom? 

"  A.  I  am  not  quite  familiar  with  all  these  different  names  of  organ- 
izations. Is  this  the  committee  which  came  to  the  defense  of  the  three 
doctors  who  were  fired  from  the  Cedars  of  Lebanon  Hospital  because  of 
their  principled  stand  on  various  issues  ?  It  is  my  recollection  that  there 
was  a  committee  which  attempted  not  only  to  defend  the  rights  of 
these  doctors,  but  particularly  to  defend  the  interests  of  the  people 
in  the  community.  It  is  my  recollection  that  the  nephritis  clinic  for 
treating  charity  patients  with  kidney  disease  was  discontinued  at  the 
Cedars  of  Lebanon  Hospital  as  the  result  of  the  dismissal  of  one  of  these 
doctors,  and,  as  a  result,  people  with  kidney  diseases  were  turned  loose 
to  find  care  as  best  they  could.  As  I  recall,  the  committee  was  active  in 
an  effort  to  try  to  get  this  unwarranted  firing  by  the  Cedars  of  Lebanon 
Hospital  reversed. 

"Q.  Do  you  recall  whether  or  not  you  attended  such  a  meeting  as  I 
have  described  on  the  dates  I  have  mentioned? 

"A.  Mr.  Combs,  I  will  decline  to  answer  this  question  as  I  did  the 
previous  ones  on  the  grounds  already  given. 

"Q.  Is  it  not  a  fact  that  on  the  twenty-seventh  day  of  February, 
1952,  you  attended  a  meeting  of  the  Medical  Division  of  the  Arts, 
Sciences  and  Professions  Council  at  a  residence  located  at  109  North 
Highland  Avenue  in  the  City  of  Los  Angeles? 


168  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

"A.  I  think  this  is  a  similar  question  to  those  previously  asked  me 
and  I  would  decline  to  answer  on  the  grounds  previously  given. 

"Q.  Is  it  not  a  fact  that  on  the  fourteenth  day  of  June,  1952,  you 
attended  a  meeting  of  the  Arts,  Sciences  and  Professions  Council  Equal 
Rights  Conference  at  the  Alexandria  Hotel  in  Los  Angeles? 

"A.  You  keep  asking  about  the  Arts,  Sciences  and  Professions 
Council;  I  would  still  have  to  give  you  the  same  declination  to  answer 
for  the  same  reasons  previously  outlined. 

"Q.  Did  you  attend  a  meeting  at  the  Alexandria  Hotel  last 
Saturday  ? 

' '  Mr.  Marshall :  Was  there  a  meeting  conducted  there,  and  if  so,  what 
is  the  name  of  the  organization? 

"Q.  By  Mr.  Combs:  Citizens  Committee  to  Preserve  American  Free- 
doms attended  by  approximately  450  people. 

"A.  I  imagine  with  a  title  like  Citizens  Committee  to  Preserve  Amer- 
ican Freedoms  it  would  definitely  be  considered  subversive  by  your 
committee,  so  I  would  therefore  have  to  refuse  to  answer  on  the  grounds 
previously  stated. 

"Q.  And  that  is  your  answer? 

' '  A.  That  is  my  answer. 

"Q.  Is  it  not  a  fact  that  on  the  sixteenth  day  of  January,  1953,  you 
attended  a  meeting  of  the  Medical  Division  of  the  Arts,  Sciences  and 
Division  Council  at  1406  South  St.  Andrews  Place  in  Los  Angeles,  at 
which  time  you  were  a  speaker? 

"A.  I  would  have  to  decline  to  answer  on  the  grounds  previously 
stated.  I  again  admire  the  wonderful  sleuthing  of  the  county  medical 
association.  You  people  should  really  employ  them  for  your  committee. 

"Q.  Do  you  know  actually  that  that  information  came  from  the 
county  medical  association,  Dr.  Perry,  or  are  you  trying  to  be  facetious  ? 
You  have  no  personal  knowledge — 

"A.  No. 

"Q.  — of  any  kind  about  where  this  information  came  from,  have 
you,  really? 

"A.  Mr.  Combs,  I  certainly  don't  intend  to  be  facetious — if  you  will 
excuse  me  for  smiling  or  laughing  sometimes — because  the  repetition  of 
questions  gets  to  the  point  where  it  is  really  humorous.  I  intend  no 
facetiousness  toward  this  committee.  It  is  my  belief  that  this  small 
clique  of  mis-leaders,  and  I  use  the  term  advisedly,  in  the  county  med- 
ical society,  the  people  who  don't  have  the  backing  of  the  great  majority 
of  the  county  medical  society,  that  they  are  actually  responsible  for 
calling  your  committee  down  to  Los  Angeles  this  week,  that  they  are 
planning  the  entire  affair,  they  told  you  exactly  what  they  want  you  to 
do,  that  they  do  it  for  their  own  selfish  interests. 


UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  169 

"Q.  That  is  your  belief? 

' '  A.  That  is  my  belief. 

' '  Q.  Do  you  have  any  evidence  as  to  that  ? 

"A.  From  reading  the  newspapers  I  couldn't  help  but  see  that  it 
was  announced,  that  this  whole  thing  was  planned  by  the  county 
medical  society,  that  it  was  planned  by  them  for  at  least  a  year,  and 
they  requested  you  to  come  down  here. 

"Q.  The  letter  of  request  we  introduced  into  evidence,  but  if  you 
will  attend  some  of  the  subsequent  sessions  here  you  will  readily  see 
how  completely  erroneous  your  assumption  is — that  the  facts  that  are 
being  set  forth  in  these  meetings  came  to  us  from  many  so-called 
counter-espionage  units  of  the  county  medical  association,  which  we 
intend  to  prove,  at  least  to  our  satisfaction 

' '  Mr.  Marshall :  I  was  here  at  part  of  the  session.  I  thought  I  heard 
a  couple  of  witnesses  telling  you  about  the  medical  society  officers 
attending  meetings,  and  they  were  testifying  about  it. 

"The  Witness:  I  read  the  Los  Angeles  Times  for  yesterday  morning. 
It  states  that  Dr.  J.  de  los  Reyes,  who  I  believe  is  vice  president  of 
the  county  medical  association — I  think  he  calls  himself  the  Senator 
Joseph  McCarthy  of  the  medical  association — he  testified  he,  himself, 
personally  heard  me  give  a  talk  about  the  importance  of  fighting  dis- 
crimination in  medicine.  As  a  result  of  reading  these  accounts  in  the 
newspaper— I  haven't  attended  any  hearings  up  to  now,  and  I 
haven't  seen  the  official  transcript,  but  I  think  everybody  in  the  com- 
munity can't  help  from  feeling  that  actually  these  few  mis-leaders 
of  the  county  medical  society  have  been  at  least  been  doing  some  of 
the  sleuthing. 

"Q.  (By  Mr.  Combs)  :  There  is  no  question  about  attending  those 
meetings,  but  those  are  not  included  on  any  of  the  dates  I  have  ques- 
tioned you  about,  and  I  won't  refer  to  any  matters  that  will  come 
before  the  committee  from  now  on.  I  anticipate  the  meeting  will  be 
covered  in  great  detail. 

"A.  I  see. 

"Q.  I  asked  you  about  the  meeting  of  January  16th.  On  February 
7,  1953,  is  it  not  a  fact  that  you  attended  a  meeting  sponsored  by  an 
organization  known  as  the  Committee  for  the  Protection  of  Foreign 
Born  at  Park  Manor  here  in  Los  Angeles,  and  that  you  spoke  there 
on  that  occasion? 

"A.  I  would  have  to  answer  as  I  did  to  one  previous  question,  that 
the  Committee  for  the  Protection  of  tire  Foreign  Born,  in  the  eyes 
of  a  committee  like  yours,  or  of  any  McCarthy  committee,  must  be 
an  extremely  subversive  organization.  It  is  my  feeling  that  Mexican- 
Americans  and  Americans  of  various  sorts  in  the  eyes  of  people  who 
have  the  beliefs  that  Senator  McCarthy  does,  that  these  people  have 


170  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

no  rights,  that  the  foreign  born  have  no  rights,  any  American,  even 
if  it  were  someone  like  myself  whose  ancestors  came  over  here  on  the 
Mayflower,  any  American  who  stands  up  for  the  rights  of  the  foreign 
born  or  the  Braceros  who  come  to  California  and  are  exploited  on  the 
farms  in  the  Central  Valley,  must  be  subversive.  Therefore,  I  would 
certainly  have  to  decline  to  answer  this  question  about  attending  a 
meeting  for  the  protection  of  the  foreign  born  on  the  grounds  previ- 
ously stated. 

"Q.  Do  you  know  if  that  was  included  in  the  list  of  organizations 
declared  by  the  Attorney  General  of  the  United  States  to  be  subversive  ? 

"A.  My  counsel  informs  me  the  best  evidence  is  the  list  of  the  At- 
torney General. 

"  Q.  I  asked  if  you  knew  ? 

"A.  My  answer  is  I  don't  know.  I  don't  follow  these  things.  I  am 
a  practicing  pediatrician.  But  knowing  what  I  know  about  your  un- 
American  committee,  I  would  assume  you  consider  it  and  I  would 
not  take  any  chance  of  subjecting  myself  to  prosecution  by  answer- 
ing it. 

"Q.  We  don't  want  your  assumption,  Dr.  Perry.  The  question  was 
whether  or  not  you  know.  Would  you  answer,  please. 

"A.  I  am  not  a  legal  expert,  I  don't  know  personally. 

"Q.  That  is  right. 

"A.  Whether  it  is  on  the  list  or  not,  but  I  am  sure  you  could  find 
out  or  I  could  find  out  if  I  wanted,  but  my  reasonable  assumption,  and 
in  protecting  myself  I  have  to  make  reasonable  assumptions,  that  it 
probably  is  listed  or  will  be  if  it  is  not  listed  now ;  that  any  committee 
which  wants  to  protect  the  rights  of  any  minority  group  in  this  coun- 
try would  be  certainly  listed  by  your  committee  and  similar  commit- 
tees as  subversive;  and  I  would  certainly  not  answer  any  questions 
which  you  might  ask  me  about  it, 

"Q.  For  the  reasons  you  have  already  given? 

' '  A.  That  is  correct. 

"Mr.  Combs:  That  is  all. 

"Mr.  Marshall :  Is  that  all,  sir  ? 

"Mr.  Combs:  That  is  all. 

' '  The  Witness :  Am  I  excused  ? 

' '  Chairman  Burns :  You  are  excused. 

TESTIMONY  OF  DR.  JACK  FLASHER,  M.D. 

The  testimony  of  the  next  witness,  Dr.  Flasher,  is  of  particular 

interest.  It  tells  a  story,  half  hidden,  discernible  more  from  what  the 

witness  refused  to  say  than  by  what  little  testimony  was  elicited  from 

him.  His  demeanor  on  the  witness  stand  and  the  circumstances  under 


UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN  CALIFORNIA  171 

which  he  appeared — all  of  these  elements  combined  to  place  this  wit- 
ness somewhat  apart  from  many  of  the  others. 

"Q.   (By  Mr.  Combs)  :  Your  name  is  Jack  Flasher? 

' '  A.  That  is  true. 

"Q.  F-1-a-s-h-e-r? 

"A.  That  is  true. 

"Q.  You  are  a  physician  and  surgeon  licensed  to  practice  your  pro- 
fession in  California? 

"A.  Yes,  I  am. 

"Q.  Dr.  Flasher,  where  did  you  take  your  medical  degree? 

"A.  University  of  Minnesota. 

"Q.  You  were  born  in  1919,  were  you  not? 

"A.  That  is  true. 

"Q.  How  long  have  you  practiced  in  California,  approximately? 

"A.  I  have  been  here  approximately  seven  years. 

"Q.  Would  you  give  the  reporter  your  professional  and  residence 
addresses,  please? 

"A.  My  residence  is  652  Bienveneda,  Pacific  Palisades.  My  princi- 
pal office  is  15247  Sunset  Boulevard,  Pacific  Palisades. 

"Q.  Dr.  Flasher,  do  you  have  with  you  any  notes  which  you  took 
at  any  prior  conference  that  you  and  I  had? 

"Mr.  Marshall:  Just  a  moment.  May  I  have  that  question  read? 
(Question  read.) 

' '  The  Witness :  I  decline  to  answer  on  the  ground  that  I  now  claim 
the  privilege  contained  in  the  Fifth  Amendment  of  the  Bill  of  Rights 
which  provides  that  you  cannot  compel  me  to  be  a  witness  against 
myself,  and  Article  I,  Section  13  of  the  Constitution  of  this  State. 

"Mr.  Combs:  Mr.  Marshall,  will  it  be  stipulated  in  other  questions 
which  I  may  ask  your  client  concerning  his  affiliation  with  or  his  at- 
tendance at  meetings  of  organizations  that  have  been  described  by  the 
official  federal  or  state  agencies  as  subversive,  that  the  same  objections 
will  be  deemed  to  apply? 

' '  Mr.  Marshall :  It  will  be  so  stipulated  if  it  will  also  be  understood 
that  the  witness  will  be  understood  to  have  declined  to  answer  upon 
certain  additional  constitutional  grounds  which  I  shall  read  very 
briefly. 

"Mr.  Combs:  And  directed  to  answer  by  the  chairman? 

"Mr.  Marshall:  And  directed  to  answer  by  the  chairman. 

"Chairman  Burns:  Would  you  read  them,  please? 

"Mr.  Marshall:  The  additional  grounds  upon  which  the  witness 
will  decline  to  answer  the  questions  in  the  category  which  you  have 
described  are,  that  he  claims :  the  protection  accorded  him  by  the  First 
Amendment  of  the  Bill  of  Rights,  and  Article  I,  Section  9  of  the 
Constitution  of  this   State;   and   he  claims  the   privileges  and  rights 


172  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

accorded  him  by  the  Fourth  Amendment  of  the  Bill  of  Rights  and 
Article  I,  Section  19  of  the  Constitution  of  this  State ;  in  addition 
to  likewise  claiming  the  privileges  and  rights  accorded  to  him  by 
Article  I,  Section  13  of  the  Constitution  of  this  State;  and  the  Four- 
teenth Amendment  of  the  Bill  of  Rights,  and  Article  I,  Section  13  of 
the  Constitution  of  this  State. 

"Mr.  Combs:  Mr.  Marshall,  I  am  going  to  ask  a  category  of  ques- 
tions which  I  don't  believe  would  be  covered  by  your  stipulation.  I 
just  say  that  in  all  fairness  because  I  want  to  go  into  a  matter  that  I 
don't  believe  you  intended  your  stipulation  to  cover. 

"Q.  Dr.  Flasher,  is  it  not  a  fact  that  you  and  I  had  a  conference 
in  my  room  at  the  Hotel  Statler  a  few  days  ago? 

"A.  I  decline  to  answer  on  the  grounds  of  all  the  previous  consti- 
tutional guarantees. 

"Q.  Is  it  not  a  fact  that  you  came  to  my  room  at  the  Statler  pur- 
suant to  a  telephone  conversation  which  you  made  to  me? 

"A.    I  decline  to  answer  upon  the  same  grounds. 

"Q.  Is  it  not  a  fact  that  as  a  result  of  our  conference  there  you 
told  me  that  if  I  asked  you  under  oath  at  this  hearing  whether  or  not 
you  were  now  or  had  ever  been  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party, 
your  answer  would  be  no? 

"A.  I  decline  to  answer  upon  the  same  grounds. 

"Q.  Is  it  not  a  further  fact  that  at  that  conference,  after  we  had 
lunch  downstairs  and  had  returned  to  the  room  and  there  was  no 
one  else  present  but  you  and  me,  that  I  agreed  with  you  that  I  would 
not  ask  you  to  give  us  the  names  of  any  other  persons  except  yourself, 
but  I  would  merely  ask  you  whether  or  not  you  had  attended  certain 
meetings  of  a  certain  organization,  and  you  agreed  that  you  would 
do  that  providing  I  would  give  you  a  copy  of  the  questions  that  I 
intended  to  ask  you,  and  that  I  did  give  you  a  copy  of  the  questions 
which  you  took  with  you,  and  that  I  retained  a  copy.  I  now  hand 
you  my  handwritten  questions,  the  ones  which  I  retained,  and  ask  you 
whether  or  not  that  is  not  a  full,  true  and  correct  copy  of  the  same 
identical  questions  that  I  gave  you  on  that  occasion.  I  will  read  them 
into  the  record,  Counsel,  so  that  you  won't  have  to  copy  them  at  this 
time. 

"Mr.  Marshall:  I  just  wanted  to  make  a  note.  I  hand  the  document 
back  to  Counsel. 

' '  The  Witness :  I  decline  to  answer  upon  the  same  grounds. 

' '  Mr.  Combs :  I  now  wish  to  read  the  questions  into  the  record. 

' '  '  Question  No.  1 :  Basic  information.  I  have  already  asked  that 
question  concerning  the  medical  background  of  the  witness  and 
his  practice  in  California. 


UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES  IN  CALIFORNIA  173 

"  'My  second  question:  Did  you  ever  hear  of  ASP,  Arts,  Sci- 
ences and  Professions  Council? 

' '  '  Third  question :  Did  you  ever  affiliate  with  the  Arts,  Sciences 
and  Professions  Council?  Then  a  note — 50-51. 

' '  '  The  next  question :  Card  dues,  Medical  Division. 

"  'Fourth  question:  Meetings  attended,  where  held,  specific 
meetings  and  subject  matter. 

' '  '  Fifth  question :  Now  a  member  of  the  Arts,  Sciences  and  Pro- 
fessions Council.  Stopped  paying  dues  as  of  January  1,  1952.  Why 
did  he  quit  ?  Because  of  two  reasons :  "  I  was  afraid  that  continued 
affiliation  with  an  organization  regarded  as  subversive  by  some 
agencies  would  be  detrimental  to  me." 

' '  '  Six :  Did  you  suspect  some  of  the  leaders  of  the  Arts,  Sciences 
and  Professions  Council  might  be  Communists  ideologically  ?  ' '  Yes, 
I  think  some  of  the  leaders  may  have  been  Communists,  ideolog- 
ically. ' ' 

"  'Seven:  Did  you  form  this  opinion  from  what  was  said  at 
the  meetings  attended  by  them?  "Yes." 

"  'Eight:  Did  you  ever  join  the  Communist  Party  or  the  Amer- 
ican Youth  for  Democracy,  the  Young  Communist  League  or  the 
Communist  Political  Association?  I  have  no  indication  in  my  notes 
as  to  what  the  witness  told  me  he  would  answer,  but  I  am  positive 
in  my  recollection  that  he  said  his  answer  would  be  no  to  each  and 
all  of  those  questions. ' 

"Q.  Is  it  not  a  further  fact,  Dr.  Flasher,  that  after  that  conference 
was  held  you  telephoned  me  and  said  you  had  discussed  the  matter  with 
a  person  whose  name  you  did  not  give,  but  you  said  he  was  a  progres- 
sive attorney,  but  you  were  not  then  sure  whether  or  not  you  could 
go  through  with  your  understanding  with  me? 

"A.  I  decline  to  answer  upon  the  same  grounds. 

"Mr.  Combs:  That  is  all. 

"Mr.  Marshall:  Is  the  witness  excused,  Mr.  Combs? 

"Mr.  Combs:  Yes. 

STIPULATION  COVERING  TESTIMONY  OF 
DR.  MORRIS  R.  FEDER,  M.D. 
"Chairman  Burns:  Is  Mr.  Marshall  in  the  room? 
"Mr.  Marshall:  Yes,  sir. 

' '  Chairman  Burns :  The  witness  we  were  going  to  have  is  gone  ? 
"Mr.  Marshall:  Yes. 

"Chairman  Burns:  May  I  refer  to  the  agreement  that  we  had,  Mr. 
Marshall  ? 

' '  Mr.  Marshall :  Yes.  Will  you  state  it,  Mr.  Combs  ? 


174  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

"Mr.  Combs:  Let  the  record  show  that  immediately  after  the  last 
witness,  Dr.  Jack  Flasher,  had  finished  his  testimony,  Mr.  Daniel  Mar- 
shall and  I  had  a  discussion  concerning  the  call  of  another  of  his  clients, 
Dr.  Morris  R.  Feder,  a  physician;  that  Dr.  Feder  received  an  emer- 
gency call  and  had  to  leave ;  that  I  agreed  with  his  attorney,  Mr.  Mar- 
shall, on  a  stipulation  which  provides  that  if  I  would  ask  Dr.  Feder 
on  the  stand  under  oath  if  he  were  now  or  had  ever  been  a  member  of 
the  Communist  Party,  and  asked  him  questions  concerning  his  member- 
ship in  or  attendance  at  meetings  of  an  organization  described  as 
subversive  by  any  state  or  federal  agency,  that  he  would  decline  to 
answer  each  and  all  of  such  questions  by  invoking  the  Fifth  Amend- 
ment to  the  Constitution  of  the  United  States  and  for  such  other  rea- 
sons as  may  be  detailed  in  the  record  by  his  counsel,  Mr.  Marshall.  Does 
that  cover  it? 

Mr.  Marshall:  It  covers  it,  Counsel.  It  will  be  so  stipulated.  The 
additional  grounds  for  declining  to  answer  the  questions  in  the  category 
which  you  have  described  are  as  follows :  the  First  Amendment  of  the 
Bill  of  Rights,  Article  I,  Section  9  of  the  Constitution  of  this  State ;  the 
Fourth  Amendment  of  the  Bill  of  Rights,  and  Article  I,  Section  19,  of 
the  California  Constitution;  Fifth  Amendment  of  the  Bill  of  Rights 
in  its  provision  that  a  person  cannot  be  compelled  to  be  a  witness 
against  himself,  and  Article  I,  Section  13,  of  the  Constitution  of  this 
State;  the  additional  grounds  are  the  Fourteenth  Amendment  to  the 
Bill  of  Rights,  and  Article  I,  Section  13,  of  the  Constitution  of  this 
State. 

"Mr.  Combs:  Now,  the  first  question  I  would  have  asked  the  witness 
consists  of  the  statement  which  appears  in  the  Los  Angeles  County 
Medical  Association  Directory  to  the  effect  that  he  is  engaged  in  gen- 
eral practice,  that  he  graduated  from  the  U.  S.  C.  Medical  School  in 
1935,  and  that  he  was  born  in  1910,  that  he  was  licensed  to  practice  his 
profession  in  California  in  1935,  that  he  resides  at  421  North  Soto 
Street,  Los  Angeles  33,  that  he  is  engaged  in  general  practice.  Will 
that  be  so  stipulated,  Mr.  Marshall? 

"Mr.  Marshall:  It  will  be  so  stipulated,  subject  to  the  limitations 
on  biographical  and  other  data  of  the  witness. 

"Mr.  Combs:  Very  well. 

"Mr.  Marshall:  I  don't  know  what  school  he  graduated  from,  but  I 
assume  you  got  it  out  of  the  Medical  Directory? 

"Mr.  Combs:  I  got  it  out  of  the  Medical  Directory,  which  has  his 
picture  in  connection  with  the  article. 

"Mr.  Marshall:  He  has  a  very  handsome  face. 

"Mr.  Combs:  Yes. 

"Mr.  Marshall:  Will  you  stipulate  to  that? 


UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  175 

■ '  Mr.  Combs :  Yes.  He  is  a  very  nice  looking-  fellow.  The  next  ques- 
tion is  whether  or  not  he  is  now  or  has  ever  been  a  member  of  the  Com- 
munist Party? 

"Mr.  Marshall:  His  response  would  be 

"Mr.  Combs:  His  response  would  be  that  he  declines  to  answer  for 
the  reasons  heretofore  given. 

"Mr.  Marshall:  So  stipulated. 

' '  Mr.  Combs :  The  next  question  is  whether  or  not  he  has  ever  been 
an  officer  in  the  American  Peace  Crusade  ? 

"Mr.  Marshall:  The  same  decimation  upon  the  stipulated  grounds. 

"Mr.  Combs:  The  next  question  is  whether  or  not  he  has  been  a 
financial  contributor  to  an  organization  known  as  the  Civil  Bights 
Congress  ? 

"Mr.  Marshall:  The  same  declination,  the  same  grounds  and  the 
same  stipulation. 

"Mr.  Combs:  The  next  question  is  whether  or  not  he  was  identified 
as  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party  by  a  witness  before  the  House 
Committee  on  Un-American  Activities? 

"Mr.  Marshall:  Same  declination,  same  grounds,  same  stipulation. 

"Mr.  Combs:  The  next  question  is  whether  or  not  he  is  a  member  of 
the  Medical  Division  of  the  Arts,  Sciences  and  Professions  Council! 

"Mr.  Marshall:  Same  declination,  same  grounds,  same  stipulation. 

' '  Mr.  Combs :  The  next  question  would  be  whether  or  not  he  is  now 
and  for  several  years  past  has  been  a  subscriber  to  a  publication  known 
as  the  Daily  People's  World? 

"Mr.  Marshall:  Same  declination,  same  grounds,  same  stipulation. 

' '  Mr.  Combs :  The  next  series  of  questions  would  be  as  follows :  is  it 
not  a  fact  that  he  attended  a  meeting  of  the  Arts,  Sciences  and  Pro- 
fessions Council,  Medical  Division  on  September  7,  1951,  at  109  North 
Highland  Avenue,  Los  Angeles? 

"Mr.  Marshall:  Same  declination,  same  grounds,  same  stipulation. 

"Mr.  Combs:  Which  in  fact  was  the  residence  of  the  witness,  Dr. 
Morris  Feder,  Mr.  Marshall? 

"Mr.  Marshall:  Same  declination,  same  grounds,  same  stipulation. 

' '  Mr.  Combs :  Is  it  not  a  fact  that  he  attended  a  meeting  of  the  Arts, 
Sciences  and  Professions  Council,  Medical  Division,  which  was  held  in 
his  home  at  the  same  address,  109  North  Highland  Avenue,  on  the  20th 
day  of  January,  1952? 

"Mr.  Marshall:  Same  declination,  same  grounds,  same  stipulation. 

"Mr.  Combs:  Is  it  not  a  fact  that  he  also  attended  in  his  home  a 
meeting  of  the  Arts,  Sciences  and  Professions  Council,  Medical  Divi- 
sion, on  the  27th  day  of  February,  1952  ? 

"Mr.  Marshall:  Same  declination,  same  grounds,  same  stipulation. 


176  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

"Mr.  Combs:  Is  it  not  a  final  fact  that  on  the  fourth  day  of  May, 
1952,  he  attended  a  Constitutional  Rights  Dinner  at  the  Hollywood 
Athletic  Club,  sponsored  by  the  Arts,  Sciences  and  Professions  Council, 
at  which  William  Schneiderman,  the  convicted  Organizer  for  the  13th 
District  of  the  Communist  Party  of  the  United  States,  and  Ben  Dobbs, 
a  Communist  functionary,  were  honored  guests? 

"Mr.  Marshall:  Same  declination,  same  grounds,  same  stipulation. 

"Mr.  Combs:  That  is  all. 

' '  Mr.  Marshall :  May  the  witness  be  excused  ? 

"Mr.  Combs:  The  witness  may  be  excused. 

"Chairman  Burns:  Are  you  coming  back  this  afternoon? 

"Mr.  Marshall:  It  would  depend  on  the  schedule  of  witnesses. 

' '  Mr.  Combs :  Don 't  you  have  other  witnesses  ? 

"Mr.  Marshall:  Yes,  I  do. 

"Chairman  Burns:  The  committee  will  staud  in  recess  to  the  hour 
of  1.30  this  afternoon. 

TESTIMONY  OF  MARTIN  HALL 

"Q.   (By  Chairman  Burns)  :  Is  Mr.  Marshall  your  counsel? 

"A.  That  is  right. 

"Chairman  Burns:  Let  the  record  show  that  the  witness  has  as  his 
counsel,  Mr.  Marshall.  Would  you  give  your  name  and  address,  please  ? 

"Mr.  Marshall:  Daniel  G.  Marshall,  1151  South  Broadway. 

"Chairman  Burns:  Mr.  Hall,  will  you  state  your  full  name  and 
address. 

"A.  My  name  is  Martin  Hall,  I  live  at  966|  Palm  Avenue,  Los 
Angeles  46. 

"Q.   (By  Mr.  Combs)  :  Los  Angeles? 

"A.  Los  Angeles. 

"Q.  Are  you  a  native  of  Germany,  Mr.  Hall? 

"A.  That  is  right. 

"Q.  How  long  have  you  resided  in  the  United  States? 

"A.  Since  1937. 

"Q.  Are  you  an  American  citizen? 

"A.  Correct. 

"Q.  By  naturalization? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  When  were  you  naturalized? 

"A.  In  1945,  in  Los  Angeles. 

"Q.  Were  you  ever  known  by  any  other  name  than  Martin  Hall? 

"A.  Yes.  My  original  name  is  a  different  one  because  I  changed  my 
name  legally,  by  order  of  the  Cook  County  Court  in  Chicago  in  1938. 

"Q.  Was  your  name  originally  Karl  Adolph  Herman  Jacobs? 


UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES  IN  CALIFORNIA  177 

"A.  Carl  Adolph  Rudolph  Herman. 

"Q.  Pardon? 

"A.  Carl  Adolph  Rudolph  Herman  Jacobs. 

"Q.  Thank  you. 

"A.  I  would  like  tot explain  why  I  have  changed  my  name,  if  I  may. 

"Q.  Surely. 

"A.  I  was  coming  to  this  Country  as  a  refugee  from  Hitler  Germany 
as  a  result  of  my  opposition  to  the  policies  of  Hitler.  When  I  arrived 
here  I  still  had  some  close  relatives  living  in  Germany.  Of  course,  I  was 
very  eager  to  protect  them  from  the  kind  of  persecution  that  was  going 
on  at  the  time.  My  parents  were  living  there,  and  the  family  of  my 
wife.  It  did  not  help  the  family  of  my  wife.  My  wife  was  Jewish.  The 
whole  family  was  wiped  out,  but  I  at  least  saved  my  parents.  This  is 
the  reason  I  changed  my  name  legally,  in  order  to  protect  these  people 
who  were  close  to  me. 

"Q.  In  what  part  of  Germany  did  they  reside? 

"A.  My  parents  resided  at  Thuringa,  which  is  in  the  middle  part  of 
Germany. 

"Q.  Do  you  have  a  daughter  named  Ruth  Anna? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  Born  in  Berlin  September  20,  1927? 

"A.  Yes. 

' '  Q.  She  came  to  the  United  States  in  1948  ? 

"A.  Pardon  me.  Would  you  repeat  the  question,  please? 

"Q.  I  asked  if  you  had  a  daughter  by  the  name  of  Ruth  Anna  who 
was  born  in  Berlin,  Germany,  September  20,  1927,  and  who  came  to 
this  Country  in  1948.  I  think  you  answered  the  first  part  of  the 
question. 

"A.  That  is  correct,  yes. 

"Q.  She  did  come  here  about  1948? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  Thank  you.  She  was  a  student  at  U.  C.  L.  A.  for  a  time,  was 
she  not? 

"A.  Yes,  she  has  been. 

"Q.  Mr.  Hall,  how  long  have  you  resided  in  California? 

"A.  I  believe  since  1940. 

"Q.  Continuously? 

"A.  Yes. 

1 '  Q.  You  were  instrumental  in  assisting  in  getting  your  daughter  out 
of  East  Germany  into  the  United  States  ? 

"A.  Yes.  I  might  elaborate  on  that.  When  we  left,  that  is,  when  my 
wife  and  I  left  Germany,  we  had  to  leave  in  a  hurry,  so  to  speak.  Our 
daughter,  who  was  very  small  then,  she  was  about  six  years  old,  was 
living  with  my  parents  at  that  time.  Of  course,  as  soon  as  we  had  left 


178  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

Germany,  we  were  trying  to  get  her  out.  It  was  the  Gestapo  who  pre- 
vented her  from  getting  out  under  the  argument  that  anyone  who  was 
opposed  to  Hitler  wasn  't  fit  to  be  born.  For  many  years  we  didn  't  know 
she  was  alive.  When  the  war  was  over  we  finally  made  contact.  It  was 
very  difficult,  and  through  the  American  Consul  in  Berlin  we  started 
proceedings  to  get  her  eventually  into  this  Country. 

"  Q.  In  what  part  of  East  Germany  did  she  reside  ? 

"A.  She  lived  in  Thuringa,  the  same  part  I  was  born  and  where  my 
parents  lived. 

"Q.  Thuringa? 

"A.  Yes. 

' '  Q.  You  were  in  Germany  in  1923,  were  you  not  ? 

"A.  Well,  I  am  afraid  I  will  have  to  refuse  to  answer  this  question, 
gentlemen,  because  in  the  first  place  I  feel  this  has  nothing  obviously 
to  do  with  the  stated  purpose  of  these  hearings,  which,  according  to  the 
statements  of  your  counsel  and  other  members,  and  according  to  the 
press,  is  an  investigation  into  the  so-called  Communist  infiltration  into 
the  medical  profession.  I  don't  know  what  this  has  to  do  with  whether 
in  the  year  1923  I  was  in  Germany  or  any  place  else.  I  think  this  is  a 
question  that  is  probably  leading  up  to  some  other  questions  which  I 
think  I  have  a  perfect  right  to  refuse  to  answer  on  the  following 
grounds:  in  the  first  place,  I  believe  that  this  is  an  invasion  of  my 
rights  to  speak  or  to  remain  silent,  to  associate  with  whomever  I  want 
to  or  not  to  associate,  of  what  I  have  been  doing  in  the  past,  of  my  right 
to  make  a  living  in  whatever  profession  I  make  a  living.  I  think  it  is 
irrelevant  to  this  hearing.  I  think  it  is  also  an  invasion  of  my  rights 
insofar  as  it  might  endanger  me  by  leading  to  some  groundless  prose- 
cution. 

"In  this  case  I  would  like  to  say  that  having  watched  many  of  these 
hearings,  not  only  the  hearings  of  this  committee,  but  some  others,  too, 
I  think  that  any  such  question  reaching  way  back  20  or  30  years  in  the 
personal  history  of  a  witness  who  ostensibly  is  called  to  testify  about 
something  going  on  now,  are  always  asked  for  the  purpose  of  trying  to 
either  smear  that  person  or  trying  to  lay  the  groundwork  for  some 
unjustified  prosecution. 

"For  this  reason  I  feel  that  I  have  to  invoke  the  Fifth  Amendment, 
not  because  that  I  have  done  anything  that  I  shouldn't  do,  or  not 
because  of  my  guilt  of  any  crime,  because  I  know  I  am  not,  but  because 
you  cannot  force  me  under  the  Fifth  Amendment  and  under  Article  I, 
Section  13,  of  the  Constitution  of  this  State  of  California,  to  be  in  any 
case  or  under  any  circumstances  a  witness  against  myself. 

"Q.  (By  Chairman  Burns)  :  How  long  did  you  say  you  had  been  in 
this  Country? 


UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN  CALIFORNIA  179 

"A.  For  14  years — no,  excuse  me.  I  will  have  to  figure  it  out.  Since 
1937.  That  is  17  years. 

"Q.  You  came  to  this  Country  17  years  ago  as  a  refugee  from  Hitler 
Germany  ? 

"A.  Right. 

"Q.  Now  you  are  attending  a  constituted  governmental  meeting  and 
telling  them  how  to  run  things,  taking  over  and  instructing  us  as  to 
our  duties  ? 

"A.  No,  sir.  I  am  not  instructing  you. 

"Q.  Mr.  Hall,  you  have  learned  very  rapidly  under  the  tutelage  of 
someone — I  have  no  idea  of  who  they  are — but  you  have  learned  very 
rapidly  how  to  run  this  Country.  I  resent  your  sitting  there  after 
coming  over  here  as  a  refugee  and  getting  asylum  in  this  Country  and 
telling  a  duly  constituted  body  how  to  run  its  affairs. 

' '  A.  Senator,  with  all  respect 

"Q.  Your  reasons  for  refusing  to  answer  the  question  are  deemed 
insufficient  and  you  are  instructed  to  answer  the  question  as  to  whether 
or  not  you  were  in  Germany  in  a  certain  year,  and  which  in  no  way 
can  incriminate  you. 

"A.  I  am  afraid,  Senator,  I  have  to  respectfully  decline  to  answer 
this  question  on  the  grounds  given,  and  also  on  the  additional  grounds 
that  this  is  an  attempt  to  deprive  me  of  my  right  to  earn  my  livelihood, 
and  my  liberty  and  property  without  due  process  of  law,  and  to  deny 
me  equal  protection  of  the  law;  it  is  contrary  to  the  Fourth  Amend- 
ment to  the  Bill  of  Rights  and  Article  I,  Section  13,  of  the  Constitu- 
tion of  this  State,  the  privileges  of  which  I  hereby  claim. 

"May  I  add  that  I  have  in  no  way  attempted  to  tell  you  or  this 
committee  how  to  run  their  business  because  it  is  not  my  business  to 
tell  you.  But  under  the  circumstances  to  which  I  am  exposed,  as  are 
the  other  witnesses  before  this  committee,  I  have  no  choice,  and  I 
believe  I  have  excellent  counsel,  but  to  invoke  these  protections  under 
the  Constitution. 

"Since  you  have  referred  to  my  citizenship  I  would  like  to  say 
this,  and  I  would  like  to  say  it  in  all  sincerity,  Senator :  I,  too,  believe 
this  sincerely.  This  citizenship  of  the  United  States  means  a  very 
great  deal  to  me  and  I  will  tell  you  why.  I  was  driven  out  of  my  native 
country  because  I  was  opposed,  and  I  had  to  oppose  in  good  conscience 
what  was  going  on  then  under  the  Hitler  regime.  I  lived  for  years, 
and  believe  me  they  were  not  light  years,  as  a  man  without  a  country. 
I  will  be  grateful  forever  to  the  United  States  for  giving  me  not  only 
asylum,  but  citizenship.  But  I  also  remember  that  the  judge,  when  he 
gave  me  citizenship,  in  the  speech  which  he  made  to  me  right  here 
in  Los  Angeles,  said,  'Let  me  congratulate  you  now  as  new  citizens 
of  this  Country.  Let  nobody  ever  tell  you  that  you  have  any  less 


180  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

rights  than  any  other  citizen  in  the  United  States  because  this  is  a 
free  country.'  I  still  believe  it  is.  I  don't  believe  that  you  can  infer 
from  what  I  have  said  in  any  way  that  I  was  trying  to  be  either  dis- 
respectful to  the  committee  or  telling  you  how  to  run  your  business. 
This  citizenship  means  so  much  to  me. 

"Q.  Did  the  judge  also  tell  you  you  were  permitted  to  defy  con- 
stitutional bodies  and  were  permitted  to  refuse  to  answer  questions 
before  a  properly  constituted  authority? 

"A.  I  can't  recall  whether  the  judge  said  anything  about  this,  but 
I  would  like  to  say  this 

"Q.  You  have  answered  the  question. 

"A.  He  told  me  this 

"Q.  I  don't  want  all  of  this  rigamarolle.  You  have  been  through 
it  a  couple  of  times. 

"Mr.  Marshall:  No,  Senator.  He  wants  to  finish  his  answer. 

' '  Chairman  Burns :  The  answer  is  finished.  He  said  he  didn  't  remem- 
ber. That's  good  enough. 

"The  Witness:  No,  but  I  would  like  to  finish. 

"Mr.  Marshall:  For  the  sake  of  the  record,  Senator,  I  want  the 
witness  to  have  an  opportunity  to  fully  answer  the  question. 

"Chairman  Burns:  He  fully  answered  it  to  my  satisfaction. 

"Mr.  Marshall:  Do  you  want  to  withdraw  the  question? 

' '  Chairman  Burns :  I  am  not  going  to  withdraw  anything,  Counsel. 

"Mr.  Marshall:  May  he  not  finish? 

"Chairman  Burns:  The  question  is  finished.  I  have  said  it  satisfied 
me.  Let's  let  it  go  at  that. 

"Mr.  Marshall:  The  witness  says  he  is  not  finished,  but  we  will 
move  along  as  on  the  others. 

' '  Chairman  Burns :  He  will  read  over  the  same  rigamarolle. 

"Mr.  Marshall:  It  is  not  the  same. 

1 '  Chairman  Burns :  The  witness  says  he  doesn  't  remember.  That  is 
good  enough  for  me. 

' '  Mr.  Marshall :  This  is  not  rigamarolle,  Senator. 

"Chairman  Burns:  I  have  one  more  question  to  ask  here.  The  other 
question  I  had  in  mind  I  forgot,  so  go  ahead. 

"Q.  (By  Mr.  Combs)  :  Mr.  Hall,  let  me  ask  you  this  question.  Is  it 
not  a  fact  that  while  you  were  in  Germany  in  1923,  you  were  a 
member  of  the  National  Executive  Board  of  an  organization  operated 
by  the  Communist  Party  of  Germany  known  as  Kostufra,  K-o-s- 
t-u-f-r-a? 

' '  Mr.  Marshall :  Would  you  spell  the  name  again  ? 

"Mr.    Combs:   K-o-s-t-u-f-r-a. 

' '  Mr.  Marshall :  How  do  you  pronounce  it  ? 


UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN  CALIFORNIA  181 

"Mr.  Combs:  'Kostufra,'  I  presume.  That  is  the  phonetic  pronun- 
ciation. 

' '  The  Witness :  I  am  afraid  I  have  to  respectfully  decline  to  answer 
this  on  the  same  grounds  given  before. 

"Q.  (By  Mr.  Combs)  :  Is  it  not  true  that  in  1924  you  became  a 
member  of  the  Young  Communist  League  in  Germany? 

"A.  I  have  to  decline  this  answer  on  the  same  grounds. 

"Mr.  Marshall:  Mr.  Combs,  for  the  sake  of  the  record,  will  it  be 
deemed  in  addition  to  all  the  grounds  of  constitutional  privilege 
claimed  by  the  witness,  that  in  all  questions  heretofore  asked  of  him 
that  he  has  also  asserted  his  privilege  under  Article  I,  Section  13,  of 
the  Constitution  of  this  State,  and  Article  I,  Section  19,  of  the  Con- 
stitution of  this  State  ? 

"Mr.  Combs:  In  addition  to  the  Fifth  Amendment  to  the  Federal 
Constitution  and  the  other  amendments  before  mentioned? 

' '  The  Witness :  And  the  First  Amendment. 

"Mr.  Combs:  So  stipulated.  Is  it  not  also  true,  during  the  years 
1935  and  1937  you  contributed  articles  to  the  Soviet  press,  particularly 
to  International  Press  correspondence  ? 

"A.  I  am  afraid  this  is  the  same  kind  of  question  which  I  decline 
to  answer  under  the  same  reservations. 

"  Q.  Is  it  not  true  that  after  you  arrived  in  Los  Angeles  you  taught 
courses  in  the  People's  Educational  Center  and  the  California  Labor 
School  in  this  city?  I  might  add  that  both  of  these  schools  have  been 
repeatedly  reported  as  operated  by  the  Communist  Party  in  Los 
Angeles  ? 

"A.  I  decline  to  answer  on  the  same  grounds. 

"Q.  Is  it  not  also  true  that  you  have  also  written  speeches  to  be 
delivered  by  the  Medical  Division  of  the  Arts,  Sciences  and  Professions 
Council? 

"A.  I  am  afraid  I  have  to  decline  on  the  same  grounds. 

"Q.  Is  it  not  true  that  in  February,  1944,  specifically  on  January 
17th  and  on  February  14th,  in  San  Francisco,  you  were  the  speaker  in 
a  series  of  forums  on  'Free  Peoples  Choose  Their  Own  Government/ 
arranged  by  the  Joint  Anti-Fascist  Refugee  Committee  which  has  been 
listed  as  subversive  by  the  Department  of  Justice  of  the  United  States? 

"A.  The  same  kind  of  question,  I  have  to  refuse  to  answer  on  the 
same  grounds. 

' '  Q.  Your  speech  on  that  occasion  having  been  reported  on  page  4  of 
the  Communist  newspaper  published  in  California,  the  Daily  People's 
World,  January  11,  1944? 

"A.  Pardon  me,  sir.  What  was  the  last  question? 

' '  Q.  The  last  question  as  I  recall  it  now — I  will  have  to  reframe  it — 
is  it  not  a  fact  that  those  speeches,  the  ones  you  were  alleged  to  have 


182  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN  CALIFORNIA 

made  in  San  Francisco  under  the  auspices  of  the  Joint  Anti-Fascist 
Beftigee  Committee,  an  organization  declared  Communist-dominated 
by  the  United  States  Department  of  Justice,  were  not  those  speeches  re- 
ported in  the  Communist  newspaper,  the  Daily  People's  World  on  page  4 
of  the  issue  of  February  11,  1944  ? 

"A.  I  am  afraid  I  will  have  to  decline  on  the  same  grounds. 

"Q.  Is  it  not  a  fact  that  in  1948  you  were  one  of  the  sponsors  for 
the  Conference  for  Peace  presented  at  the  Arts,  Sciences  and  Pro- 
fessions Council  in  Los  Angeles  ? 

"A.  That  is  the  same  kind  of  question.  I  will  have  to  refuse  to 
answer  on  the  same  grounds. 

"Q.  Is  it  not  a  fact  you  were  a  member  of  the  Civil  Bights  Congress 
declared  subversive  by  the  United  States  Department  of  Justice? 

"A.  The  same  kind  of  question.  I  refuse  on  the  same  grounds. 

"Q.  Did  you  ever  reside  in  Wisconsin? 

"A.  I  will  have  to  decline  for  the  same  reasons,  I  am  sorry. 

"Q.  Do  you  refuse  to  tell  us  whether  or  not  you  ever  lived  in  Wis- 
consin ? 

' '  Chairman  Burns :  On  the  ground  that  it  may  tend  to  incriminate 
you? 

"The  Witness:  It  might.  For  the  record  I  am  saying  I  decline  to 
answer  on  the  same  grounds.  I  would  like  to  repeat  what  I  said.  If  I 
am  invoking  the  Fifth,  it  isn't  because  I  feel  I  have  done  anything  as 
a  crime,  but  I  have  to  protect  myself  from  unjust  prosecution. 

"Q.   (By  Mr.  Combs)  :  Did  you  ever  reside  in  Phoenix,  Arizona? 

"A.  Same  question,  same  answer. 

"Q.  It  is  not  the  same  question. 

"A.  I  am  sorry. 

"Q.  It  is  a  different  question. 

*'A.  Same  kind  of  answer,  I  am  sorry. 

"Q.  Is  it  not  a  fact  that  you  were  appointed  a  delegate  from  the 
California  Labor  School,  which  is  the  Communist  school  heretofore  re- 
ferred to  in  Los  Angeles,  a  delegate  from  that  school  to  the  American 
Continental  Congress  for  Peace  in  Mexico  City,  September  5  to  11, 
inclusive,  1949? 

"A.  I  am  afraid  I  have  to  decline  on  the  same  grounds. 

"Q.  Were  you  not  a  delegate  to  speak  on  behalf  of  the  California 
Labor  School  in  the  interests  of  a  movement  known  as  the  Committee 
for  Peaceful  Alternatives  to  the  Atlantic  Pact  at  a  meeting  held  Sep- 
tember 23,  1949,  at  232  South  Hill  Street  in  the  City  of  Los  Angeles? 

"A.  I  am  afraid  I  will  have  to  decline  to  answer  on  the  same  grounds. 

' '  Mr.  Marshall :  For  the  sake  of  the  record,  all  of  these  organizations 
or  meetings  that  you  mention  are  regarded  by  the  committee  as  being 
subversive  ? 


UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  183 

' '  Chairman  Burns  :  I  object  to  that. 

"Mr.  Combs:  No. 

' '  Chairman  Burns :  No. 

"Mr.  Combs:  Not  exactly. 

"Chairman  Burns:  No. 

' '  Mr.  Combs :  We  have  made  no  such  statement. 

"Mr.  Marshall:  I  see.  What  kind  of  organizations  are  they? 

"Mr.  Combs:  The  witness  should  know  if  he  participated  in  them. 

' '  Mr.  Marshall :  What  does  the  committee  know  about  them  ? 

"Mr.  Combs:  That  is  something  within  the  prerogative  of  the  com- 
mittee. The  committee  does  not  happen  to  be  on  the  witness  stand. 

"Chairman  Burns:  Do  you  make  that  statement,  Mr.  Marshall,  as 
a  matter  of  fact,  that  all  of  these  organizations  are  subversive  organ- 
izations ? 

' '  Mr.  Marshall :  By  no  means,  Senator.  You  completely  misunder- 
stand me. 

"Chairman  Burns:  What  is  the  purpose  of  your  statement? 

' '  Mr.  Marshall :  What  is  actually  subversive  and  what  the  committee 
regards  as  subversive  are  as  different  as  night  and  day.  You  might 
have,  in  my  opinion,  a  completely  irrational  classification  of  organiza- 
tions on  your  peculiar  standards.  However,  you  have  written  them 
down  in  your  black  book  as  being  bad  organizations. 

"Mr.  Combs  :  Red  book. 

"Mr.  Marshall:  Red  book,  but  that  wouldn't  make  them  so  in  my 
opinion. 

' '  Senator  McCarthy  :  Mr.  Chairman — ■ 

1 '  Senator  Burns :  Senator  McCarthy. 

"Senator  McCarthy:  Mr.  Marshall,  can  you  tell  us  what  your  defini- 
tion of  a  subversive  organization  is? 

"Mr.  Marshall:  Well,  Senator,  I  am  here  in  the  role  of  counsel.  I 
am  here  to  be  instructed.  I  would  like  to  have  instructions  from  you 
on  that  definition. 

' '  Chairman  Burns :  We  will  be  very  happy  to  give  it  to  you,  but  on 
the  other  hand  we  don't  want  voluntary  statements  by  counsel  for  the 
record.  That  is  what  we  are  objecting  to. 

"Mr.  Marshall:  When  Senator  McCarthy  asked  me  a  question  I  felt 
in  courtesy  I  should  respond. 

"Senator  Burns:  That  is  correct.  I  am  not  objecting  to  that.  I  am 
objecting  to  voluntary  statements  you  made  a  moment  ago  as  to  a  stipu- 
lation that  these  organizations  that  the  committee  counsel  mentioned 
are  subversive  groups.  We  don't  take  that  position.  If  you  wish  to 
answer  Senator  McCarthy's  question,  you  may. 

"Mr.  Marshall:  I  will  wait  for  his  definition  of  the  term. 

"Senator  McCarthy:  I  am  asking  you  a  question. 


184  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

"Mr.  Marshall:  Senator,  I  don't  want  to  bicker  with  you  about  it. 
I  agree  with  Judge  Edgerton  in  the  Barsky  case  that  the  House  Com- 
mittee's definition  of  un-American,  as  contained  in  the  resolution,  is 
just  as  completely  ambiguous  and  irrational  as  the  standards  applied 
by  this  committee  and  its  predecessor  in  its  work  in  this  State.  Does 
that  answer  you,  Senator? 

"Senator  Burns:  I  might  add,  Counsel,  that  you  are  not  here  as  a 
witness. 

"Mr.  Marshall:  I  am  very  glad  to  continue  the  definition,  however. 

' '  Chairman  Burns :  You  were  not  required  to  answer  any  questions. 
It  is  simply  a  matter  of  courtesy.  You  have  not  seen  fit  to  do  it.  I  sup- 
pose Senator  McCarthy  is  satisfied. 

' '  Mr.  Marshall :  I  want  to  be  courteous,  Senator. 

"Senator  McCarthy:  Maybe  Mr.  Hall  would  like  to  answer  the 
question. 

' '  Mr.  Combs :  May  I  continue,  Mr.  Chairman. 

' '  Chairman  Burns :  Continue. 

"Q.  (By  Mr.  Combs)  :  Mr.  Hall,  have  you  ever  been  affiliated  with 
the  Joint  Anti-Fascist  Refugee  Committeel 

"A.  I  decline  to  answer  this  question  on  the  same  grounds  stated 
before. 

"Q.  Have  you  ever  been  affiliated  with  the  International  Workers' 
Order  ? 

"A.  I  have  to  decline  to  answer  the  question  on  the  same  grounds. 

"Q.  Is  it  not  a  fact  that  on  the  eleventh  day  of  July,  1952,  you  ad- 
dressed a  meeting  of  the  West  Adams  Women's  Club,  2409  South  La 
Brea  Avenue,  asking  for  clemency  for  the  Rosenbergs? 

"A.  In  view  of  the  standards  that  have  been  set  to  qualify  everyone 
who  has  protested  at  one  time  or  another  against  an  injustice  is  at  least 
suspect  of  being  subversive,  I  am  afraid  I  will  have  to  decline  to 
answer  this  question  on  the  same  grounds. 

"Q.  Is  it  not  also  a  fact  that  on  the  twenty-eighth  day  of  August, 
1952,  you  wrote  a  letter  with  Pauline  Schindler  and  addressed  it  to  the 
Los  Angeles  City  Housing  Authority,  protesting  the  discharge  of  Frank 
Wilkinson  because  he  was  found  to  be  a  member  of  the  Communist 
Party? 

"A.  I  would  like  to  point  out  what  you  are  asking  me  now  is  com- 
pletely a  legal  professional  kind  of  activity,  of  having  written  an  article, 
making  a  speech  or  signing  a  petition  to  some  authority — all  of  this 
seems  to  be  under  the  same  context  of  trying  to  prove  some  sort  of 
subversive  character  about  my  activities.  For  this  reason  I  am  afraid 
I  have  to  decline  for  the  reasons  stated. 


UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  185 

" Q.  Do  you  have  the  same  attitude  toward  this  question  ?  Is  it  not  a 
fact  that  on  the  sixth  day  of  November,  1953,  you  attended  a  celebra- 
tion of  the  thirty-sixth  anniversary  of  the  Russian  Revolution,  spon- 
sored by  the  American-Russian  Institute  at  the  Park  Manor  in  Los 
Angeles  ? 

"A.I  will  have  to  decline  to  answer  that  under  the  reasons  heretofore 
stated. 

"Q.  Is  it  not  a  fact  that  on  the  sixth  day  of  May,  1954,  you  spoke  on 
'Soviet  Prosperity'  under  the  auspices  of  the  American-Russian  Insti- 
tute, 90  McAllister  Street,  in  San  Francisco  ? 

"  A.  I  will  have  to  decline  to  answer  that  for  the  same  reasons. 

"Q.  That  was  last  May.  Are  you  now  a  member  of  the  Executive 
Committee  of  the  Arts,  Sciences  and  Professions  Council  in  Los  An- 
geles ? 

"A.  I  will  have  to  decline  to  answer  that  for  the  same  reasons. 

"Mr.  Combs:  That  is  all. 

"Chairman  Burns:  Senator  McCarthy  has  a  question. 

"Q.  (By  Senator  McCarthy)  :  Mr.  Hall,  what  is  your  present  occu- 
pation ? 

"A.  I  am  afraid— I  am  a  free  lance  writer  on  national  and  inter- 
national affairs.  My  political  opinions,  therefore,  are  a  question  of 
public  rceord.  I  have  written  for  The  Nation,  The  Christian  Century,  The 
Christian  Register,  The  Churchman,  and  the  Frontier  Magazine.  I  am  speak- 
ing at  public  meetings  three  or  four  times  a  week.  Everyone  who  would 
like  to  know  what  I  think  about  politics  could  ascertain  that  very  easily 
because  it  is  all  of  record. 

"Q.  (By  Mr.  Combs)  :  Where  is  the  Frontier  Magazine  published,  in 
Beverly  Hills  ? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  Have  you  contributed  to  that  publication  on  more  than  one 
occasion  ? 

1 '  A.  Sure  I  have,  several  times. 

"Mr.  Combs:  That  is  all. 

' '  The  "Witness :  I  think  it  is  a  good  magazine,  too. 

"Mr.  Combs :  I  am  sure  you  do. 

' '  Mr.  Marshall :  Is  the  witness  excused  ? 

1 '  Mr.  Combs :  I  don 't  know. 

1 '  Chairman  Burns :  Just  a  minute.  Do  you  have  any  questions  ? 

"Senator  Thompson:  No  questions,  Mr.  Chairman. 

' '  Chairman  Burns :  I  think  that  is  all. 

"Mr.  Combs:  I  think  I  asked  this  question,  but  I  have  been  told  that 
if  I  did  I  didn't  make  it  clear.  Are  you  now  a  member  of  the  Commu- 
nist Party  of  the  United  States  ? 


186  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

"A.  I  decline  to  answer  this  question  on  the  same  grounds. 

"Mr.  Combs :  That  is  all. 

' '  Mr.  Marshall :  Is  the  witness  excused,  Senator  ? 

' '  Chairman  Burns :  Yes. 

' '  The  Witness  :  Thank  you,  gentlemen. 

TESTIMONY  OF  DR.  MURRAY  KORNGOLD,  PSYCHOLOGIST 

"Q.   (By  Mr.  Combs)  :  Doctor,  your  name  is  Dr.  Murray  Korngold? 

"A.  That  is  right. 

' '  Q.  Do  you  spell  the  name  K-o-r-i-n-g-o-l-d  ? 

"A.  That  is  wrong.  It  is  spelled  K-o-r-n-g-o-l-d. 

"Q.  You  are  physician  and  surgeon  licensed  to  practice  your  profes- 
sion in  California  ? 

"A.  No,  I  am  not.  I  am  a  clinical  psychologist  with  a  degree  of  Doctor 
of  Philosophy  and  Psychology. 

"Q.  From  what  institution  did  you  obtain  your  doctorate? 

"A.  I  was  very  pleased  to  receive  my  degree  from  the  University  of 
California  at  Los  Angeles. 

"  Q.  In  what  year,  Doctor  ? 

"A.  That  was  in  the  year  1953. 

"Q.  Did  you  ever  act  as  an  instructor  at  any  educational  institution? 

"A.  I  feel  it  necessary  to  preface  my  remark  with  a  qualification. 
With  regard  to  all  questions  which  the  committee  chooses  to  ask  here  I 
don't  want  to  give  you  the  impression  of  shamefacedly  apologizing  for 
or  concealing  any  aspect  of  my  life  history,  my  thoughts  or  my  actions. 
I  have  been  guided  by  what  I  think  are  strictly  moral  considerations 
in  the  selection  of  my  thoughts  and  actions.  Consequently,  I  am  not 
ashamed  of  my  activities  in  general,  which  have  been  dedicated  as  near 
as  I  can  make  out  to  the  welfare  of  the  public.  However,  because  of  the 
context  of  hysteria  created  not  only  by  this  committee  but  other  com- 
mittees like  it  throughout  the  land,  the  multitudinous  laws,  many  of 
them  contradictory  with  each  other,  being  held  ready  to  inflict  punish- 
ment on  those  who  express  views  publicly  and  give  evidence  of  this  sort 
publicly,  I  would  prefer  to  decline  to  answer  this  question,  claiming  as 
I  do  the  privilege  against  self-incrimination  conferred  on  me  by  the 
Fifth  Amendment  of  the  Constitution  and  the  parallel  provision  in 
the  State  Constitution,  Article  I,  Section  13.  This  is  by  no  means  an 
evasion,  but  rather  a  defense  of  others  who  one  day  will  appear  in  my 
position  to  avoid  being  incriminated  for  whatever  activities  they  may 
be  confronted  with. 

"Q.  Then  you  refuse  to  answer  the  question  which  was,  of  course: 
have  you  ever  acted  as  instructor  in  any  educational  institution?  You 
decline  to  answer  that  question  for  the  reason  you  have  given  ? 

"A.  That  is  correct. 


UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN  CALIFORNIA  187 

"Q.  Is  it  not  a  fact  that  you  did  act  as  an  instructor,  Dr.  Korngold, 
in  the  People's  Educational  Center  of  this  city  which  has  heretofore 
been  identified  as  the  Communist  school,  in  the  year  1947  ?  I  will  amplify 
that  if  I  may. 

"A.  Very  well. 

' '  Q.  And  the  basic  course  which  you  taught  was  entitled  '  Science  and 
Society?' 

"A.  I  believe,  Mr.  Combs,  despite  your  characterization  of  this  insti- 
tution today  that  it  is  a  matter  of  public  record  that  the  curriculum  and 
members  of  this  institution  and  others  like  it  were  devoted  to  securing 
peace,  were  devoted  to  raising  the  educational  level  of  a  number  of 
working  adults,  and  whether  or  not  I  taught  at  this  or  any  like  institu- 
tion does  not  invalidate  the  fact  that — at  least  I  so  regard  it  as  a  fact 
that  institutions  like  this  conducted  themselves  with  a  good  deal  of 
propriety,  with  a  good  deal  of  dignity  and  for  the  best  interests  of  the 
United  States  of  America. 

"Q.  The  question  is,  did  you  teach  at  that  institution? 

"A.  I  decline  to  answer,  for  the  reasons  given,  that  question  yea  or  nay. 

"Q.  Did  you  teach  a  course  entitled  'Dialectical  Materialism  No.  2' 
at  the  winter  session  of  the  California  Lai) or  School  in  Los  Angeles  in 
1950? 

1 '  A.  With  regard  to  that  question,  my  feeling  is  and  always  has  been 
that  the  key  right  of  American  citizens,  secured  by  the  First  Amend- 
ment to  the  Constitution,  is  the  freedom  to  speak  and  think  as  the 
individual  so  deems  proper,  and  of  course,  freedom  to  associate  per- 
sonally and  politically  as  he  deems  fit. 

' '  Chairman  Burns :  Did  anyone  stop  you  from  teaching  at  this  school  ? 
Did  anyone  stop  you  from  teaching,  if  you  did? 

"A.  If  I  may  say 

"  Q.  You  can  answer  yes  or  no. 

"A.  I  can  answer  it  as  I  choose,  sir. 

"Q.  You  can't  answer  as  you  choose.  You  can  answer  yes  or  no, 
or  I  will  withdraw  the  question. 

"Mr.  Branton    (counsel  for  the  witness)  :  We  will  accept  that. 

"Chairman  Burns:  Very  well.  I  will  withdraw  the  question. 

"The  Witness:  The  point  in  relation  to  the  question  made  by  Mr. 
Combs  is  that  to  the  degree  that  one  is  penalized  or  threatened  with 
penalty,  or  with  intimidation  or  with  harassment  for  teaching,  think- 
ing, writing,  or  speaking  along  this  or  any  other  line,  to  that  extent 
the  right  to  think  and  speak  freely  is  impaired.  The  very  presence 
of  this  committee  at  this  time  questioning  me  as  to  the  propriety,  by 
implication,  of  my  having  taught  or  not  taught  such  courses  at  such 
a  school  tends  to  seriously  undermine  the  right  of  all  Americans  to 
dissent  politically  from  the  prevailing  idea  or  the  idea  in  vogue  at 


188  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

the  moment.  For  this  reason  I  choose  to  decline  to  answer  that  ques- 
tion, and  in  so  doing,  defend  the  right  of  other  citizens  to  dissent 
politically  if  they  so  choose. 

"Q.  (By  Mr.  Combs)  :  Did  you  ever  teach  a  course  in  an  institution 
in  Los  Angeles  known  as  the  Sequoia  School  f 

"A.  To  the  best  of  my  knowledge,  Mr.  Combs,  the  school  that  you 
have  referred  to — I  must  say  this,  since  the  implication  contained  in 
your  question  is  that  the  school  you  referred  to  was  guilty  of  some 
reprehensible  action  or  code  of  ethics  or  something  antisocial,  to  the 
best  of  my  knowledge  the  school  that  you  refer  to  was  genuinely  de- 
voted to — if  they  still  exist  I  don't  know — genuinely  devoted  to 
advancing  the  welfare  of  the  public.  As  to  whether  of  not  I  taught  at 
the  Sequoia  School  I  must  decline  to  answer  on  the  same  grounds  as 
previously  stated. 

"Senator  Thompson:  Would  you  repeat  the  question? 

"Mr.  Combs:  The  question  that  Senator  Thompson  asked  for  was 
whether  or  not  he  ever  taught  in  an  educational  institution  at  Los 
Angeles  known  as  the  Sequoia  School. 

"Senator  Thompson:  That  would  require  a  yes  or  no  answer. 

' '  Mr.  Combs :  It  could  be  answered  yes  or  no,  certainly. 

' '  Senator  Thompson :  Thank  you. 

Q.  (By  Mr.  Combs)  :  Have  you  ever  heard  of  an  organization  in 
Los  Angeles  known  as  the  Arts,  Sciences  and  Professions  Council? 

"A.  Do  you  mean  the  National  Council  of  Arts,  Sciences  and  Pro- 
fessions ? 

"Q.  No,  I  mean  the  Los  Angeles  chapter. 

"A.  That  body  of  individuals  which  is  devoted  to  advancing  the 
health  and  welfare  and  cultural  standards  of  the  population  of  Los 
Angeles  ? 

"Q.  Now,  Doctor,  please. 

"A.  Is  that  the  body  to  which  you  refer,  sir? 

"Q.  The  question  was  simply  whether  or  not  you  ever  heard  of 
an  organization  known  as  the  Arts,  Sciences  and  Professions  Council 
in  Los  Angeles. 

"A.  If  you  and  I  have  the  same  reference  with  regard  to  these 
letters  ASP. 

"Q.  It  is  an  organization.  I  am  not  trying  to  define  it.  Did  you 
ever  hear  of  it?  Did  you  or  didn't  you? 

"A.  I  have  heard  of  this  most  estimable  organization. 

"Q.  Then  you  have  answered  the  question. 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  Thank  you,  very  much.  Have  you  ever  been  a  member  of  it? 

"A.  For  me  to  admit  association  in  any  such  political  organizations 
that  have  been  named  by  the  Attorney  General 


UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  189 

"Q.  Is  it  a  political  organization? 

"A.  Any  such  organization,  whether  political,  cultural,  civic  society 
that  has  been  identified  by  the  public  authorities  as  subversive,  or  in 
some  manner  a  reprehensible  organization — although  I  do  not  implic- 
itly accept  this  characterization — would  lay  me  open  to  penalties 
whether  I  answered  yes  or  no.  Therefore,  I  decline  to  answer  this 
question  on  the  grounds  previously  stated. 

"  Q.  Is  it  not  a  fact  that  in  1952  you  were  a  member  of  the  Medical 
Division  of  the  Arts,  Sciences  and  Professions  Council  in  Los  Angeles? 

"A.  I  decline  to  answer  that  question  on  the  grounds  previously 
stated. 

"Q.  Is  it  not  a  fact  that  on  the  sixteenth  day  of  January,  1952, 
you  attended  a  meeting  of  the  Health  and  Welfare  Division  of  the 
Medical  Section  or  Division  of  the  Arts,  Sciences  and  Professions 
Council  at  a  residence  in  Los  Angeles? 

"A.  Are  you  implying,  Mr.  Combs — I  may  be  misinterpreting  your 
question,  but  are  you  implying  this  was  in  some  way  or  would  have 
been  in  some  way,  if  this  act  occurred,  a  reprehensible  act? 

"Q.  I  am  not  implying  anything.  I  am  asking  for  your  best  recol- 
lection of  whether  or  not  you  attended  that  meeting.  You  can  answer 
yes  or  no  or  you  don't  remember,  or  you  can  invoke  your  constitu- 
tional rights. 

"A.  Because  for  a  witness  under  these  circumstances  to  be  placed 
in  a  position  where  he  must  decline  to  answer  a  question,  which  I 
think  was  fairly  predicted  by  the  mass  of  your  questions,  I  don't 
imagine  you  would  predict  any  other  outcome — I  think  must  serve 
some  purpose.  As  I  sit  here  and  cogitate  over  the  questions  you  ask, 
I  wonder  what  purpose  could  possibly  be  served  by  your  compelling 
witnesses  to  answer.  Is  it  for  the  sake  of  eliciting  information  or  set- 
ting the  stage  for  some  kind  of  a  legislative  act  which  would  publicize 
professional  people  for  declining  to  answer  questions  like  this.  Perhaps 
I  should  not  inquire  into  your  motives,  but  I  have  a  sneaking  suspicion 
this  motive  exists. 

"Q.  You  are  entitled  to  whatever  suspicion  you  care  to  harbor. 
Would  you  answer  the  question,  Dr.  Korngold,  please. 

"A.  I  decline  to  answer  on  the  grounds  previously  stated. 

"Q.  Is  it  not  a  fact  you  were  also  affiliated  with  an  organization 
known  as  the  Civil  Bights  Congress,  which  has  been  declared  Com- 
munist-dominated by  the  United  States  Department  of  Justice? 

"A.  Which  should  make  that  characterization  an  established  fact? 

"Q.  I  didn't  say  that.  I  said  it  had  been  listed  in  that  manner  by  the 
Department  of  Justice.  My  question  to  you  is  whether  or  not  you  are 
affiliated  with  it? 


190  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

"A.  I  would  decline  to  answer  that  question  on  the  grounds  previ- 
ously stated. 

"Q.  Is  it  not  a  fact  that  on  the  twelfth  day  of  September,  1953,  you 
attended  a  meeting  of  the  Civil  Rights  Congress  at  1251  South  St. 
Andrews  Place  in  Los  Angeles? 

"A.  May  I  have  the  question  repeated? 

' '  Mr.  Combs :  Yes. 

"Q.  Is  it  not  a  fact  that  on  the  twelfth  day  of  September,  1953,  you 
attended  a  meeting  of  the  Civil  Rights  Congress,  1251  South  St.  An- 
drews Place  in  the  City  of  Los  Angeles  ? 

"A.  In  your  view,  Mr.  Combs,  does  a  citizen  of  the  United  States 
have  a  right  to  attend  whatever  meetings  he  chooses  to  ? 

"Q.  I  am  not  a  witness,  sir.  I  am  supposed  to  ask  questions  and  you 
are  supposed  to  answer. 

"A.  It  may  have  been  a  rhetorical  way  of  stating  a  view  on  my  part. 
I  would  decline  to  answer  the  question  on  the  grounds  previously 
stated. 

' '  Q.  Are  you  attached  to  the  medical  staffs  of  any  hospitals  or  clinics 
in  Los  Angeles,  Doctor  ? 

"A.  I  think  it  is  incumbent  on  me  to  explain  a  little  more  fully  what 
my  professional  standing  is.  The  degree  of  Doctor  of  Philosophy  and 
Clinical  Psychology  is  not  a  medical  degree,  consequently  it  does  not 
entitle  persons  so  endowed  with  rights  of  membership  in  medical  staffs 
or  with  the  right  to  prescribe  medicine,  or  for  that  matter  any  other 
prerogative  confined  exclusively  to  physicians.  Therefore,  it  would  be 
most  inappropriate  for  me  to  be  or  to  affirm  any  membership  in  any 
medical  staff. 

"Q.  I  see.  Are  you  connected  in  any  way  with  an  organization  known 
as  the  Community  Medical  Center1! 

"A.  I  would  appreciate  it  if  you  would  amplify  the  one  portion  of 
your  question,  'attached  in  any  way.' 

"Q.  I  will  be  glad  to. 

"A.  Would  you,  please? 

"Q.  Particularly  in  light  of  the  explanation  which  you  made  awhile 
ago.  Have  you  been  connected  with  the  staff,  medical  or  otherwise,  of 
the  Community  Medical  Center1!  It  is  my  understanding,  I  may  be  in 
error,  Doctor — I  am  very  sincere  in  this — I  don't  know — it  is  my 
understanding  it  has  a  medical  staff  and  in  addition  to  its  clinical  staff 
probably  a  radiologist,  technicians,  laboratory  experts,  and  so  on. 

"A.  I  think  it  is  unfortunate 

"Mr.  Branton:  Just  a  moment. 

"The  Witness:  It  is  extremely  unfortunate  that  I  am  placed  in  a 
position  where  I  must  affirm  or  deny  or  decline  to  state  concerning  an 


UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  191 

institution  which  has  set  itself  up  as  a  matter  of  public  record  with  the 
task  of  affording  some  kind  of  prepaid  health  insurance  plan  for  mem- 
bers of  low  income  groups  which  despite  relatively  meager  financing 
has  done  a  remarkable  job,  and  because  of  this  has  in  some  way  ruffled 
the  feathers  of  a  certain  Cadillac  clique  that  dominates  the  Los  Angeles 
County  Medical  Association,  which  has  bound  itself  to  the  aim  of  under- 
mining or  destroying  this  or  any  other  form  of  prepaid  health  insur- 
ance, I  think  it  is  deplorable  parenthetically,  that  a  State  Senate  Com- 
mittee should  lend  itself  to  such  unethical  aims  as  that  espoused  by  the 
L.  A.  C.  M.  A. 

"Q.  Would  you  answer  the  question,  Doctor? 

"A.  For  that  reason,  since  the  Community  Medical  Center  has  teen 
placed  in  the  most  unfortunate  and  lamentable  position  of  being  at- 
tacked for  reasons  that  are  purely  fantastic,  for  reasons  that  are  con- 
jured up  out  of  the  unwholesome  machinations  of  a  few,  shall  I  say, 
greedy  people — I  cannot  answer  a  question  of  this  sort  relating  to  the 
Community  Medical  Center  for  reasons  formerly  stated. 

"Q.  Did  you  attend  a  meeting  sponsored  by  the  Community  Medical 
Center  on  the  tenth  day  of  April  of  this  year  in  honor  of  the  Keverend 
Stephen  Fritchman  ? 

"A.  This  meeting,  as  I  understand  it — what  sort  of  a  meeting  are 
you  referring  to? 

"Q.  A  testimonial  dinner. 

"A.  In  no  way,  in  my  opinion — I  assume  that  my  opinion  is  a  rele- 
vant consideration  in  the  testimony  here — is  there  anything  wrong. 

"Q.  It  would  be  relevant  to  determine  for  yourself  whether  or  not 
you  wish  to  answer  this  question. 

"A.  To  put  it  plainly  and  succinctly  I  think  every  citizen  has  a  right 
to  attend  this  sort  of  testimonial  dinner,  or  any  other  dinner  honoring 
a  recognized  leader  of  the  public,  of  his  church,  and  of  the  community. 

"I  know  from  public  evidence  that  Mr.  Fritchman  is  a  most  sincere 
and  devoted  and  dignified  person,  I  may  say,  and  although  I  am  not 
in  any  way  implying  by  this  answer  that  I  did  not  and  do  not,  or  for 
that  matter  anyone  else  did  not  or  does  not  have  the  right  to  attend 
such  a  dinner,  I  must  decline  respectfully  to  answer  that  question  on 
the  grounds  previously  stated. 

"Q.  Are  you  now  or  have  you  ever  been  a  member  of  the  Communist 
Party,  Doctor? 

"A.  That  is  a  question  I  would  decline  to  answer. 

"Mr.  Combs:  That  is  all. 

' '  Mr.  Branton :  May  the  witness  be  excused  ? 

"Mr.  Combs:  As  far  as  I  am  concerned. 

"Mr.  Branton:  May  the  record  show  the  witness  was  represented  by 
Counsel  Leo  Branton,  Jr.,  112  West  Ninth  Street,  Los  Angeles? 


192  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN  CALIFORNIA 


' '  Mr.  Combs :  Yes,  and  the  witness  was  put  on  at  this  time 

' '  Mr.  Branton :  As  a  courtesy  to  me. 

' '  Mr.  Combs :  As  a  courtesy  to  you. 

"Mr.  Branton:  I  appreciate  it.  Thank  you. 

STATEMENT  FILED  AS  AN  EXHIBIT  IN  CONNECTION  WiYh 
THE  TESTIMONY  OF  DR.  KORNGOLD 

"The  committee,  adhering  to  its  policy  of  receiving  written  state- 
ments from  witnesses  rather  than  allowing  them  to  be  read  by  the 
witness  as  a  part  of  his  testimony,  filed  the  following  statement  sub- 
mitted by  Dr.  Korngold  in  connection  with  his  testimony.  The  state- 
ment reads  as  follows : 

"  'From  Dr.  Murray  Korngold,  Ph.D.,  8350  Wilshire  Boulevard, 
Beverly  Hills,  California. 

"  'I  feel  it  necessary  to  set  forth  publicly  and  in  advance  of  my 
hearing  before  the  Burns  Committee  the  reasons  for  my  refusal  to 
answer  all  the  questions  that  this  committee  may  choose  to  ask.  Also 
I  wish  to  explain  why  I  would  regard  cooperation  with  this  com- 
mittee as  an  act  which  would  dishonor  me  and  my  country : 

' '  '  First :  it  is  morally  nonpermissible  for  anyone,  whether  freely 
or  under  duress,  to  give  names  to  an  inquisitorial  body  which  will 
then  proceed  to  harass  and  persecute  honest  people  on  the  basis  of 
such  information.  In  a  word,  it  is  in  the  deepest  sense  un-American 
to  be  a  stool  pigeon,  informer,  a  Judas  Iscariot,  however  much  in 
vogue  such  persons  may  be  at  this  time. 

' '  '  Second :  this  committee  and  others  like  it  seek  to  implant  in 
the  public  mind  the  delusion  taken  directly  from  the  Joe  McCar- 
thy-Mickey Spillane  lunacy  which  identifies  every  effort  to  advance 
the  welfare  of  the  public  as  a  "Communist  conspiracy."  Even 
tacitly  to  accept  this  committee's  false  premise  is  by  that  same 
degree  to  assist  in  poisoning  the  public  mind  against  the  growing 
movement  for  an  end  to  racial  discrimination  in  all  phases  of  our 
life;  would  assist  in  poisoning  the  public  mind  against  seeking 
peaceful  alternatives  to  global  war;  would  be,  in  fact,  an  act  sup- 
porting little  McCarthys  in  our  state  who  by  means  of  this  false 
premise  restrict  and  undermine  democratic  rights,  all  in  the  name 
of  fighting  Communism. 

' '  '  Third :  in  the  practice  of  clinical  psychology,  the  relation  be- 
tween client  and  psychologist  depends  very  greatly  on  the  psy- 
chologist's integrity  as  a  human  being,  his  ability  to  inspire  trust 
in  others,  that  he  will  not  under  any  circumstances  betray  a  con- 
fidence. 

"  'Further,  the  whole  training  and  practice  of  a  clinical  psy- 
chologist is  permeated  by  the  striving  for  independence  of  judg- 


UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  193 

ment.  In  the  light  of  this  and  with  the  faces  of  my  clients  before 
me  I  am  impelled  to  the  conclusion  that  for  me  to  bow  before  this 
committee's  demand  either  to  shamefacedly  deny  or  apologize  for 
my  life,  thought  and  actions,  would  be  an  act  totally  lacking  in 
the  dignity  befitting  a  person  who  proposes  to  help  others  with 
their  innermost  problems. 

' '  '  Fourth :  knowing  as  I  do,  the  aims  of  this  committee,  on  the 
basis  of  this  hearing  to  insinuate  legislation  depriving  professionals 
of  their  licenses  on  political  grounds,  I  cannot  cooperate  with  Mr. 
Burns'  committee  without  simultaneously  doing  injury  to  profes- 
sionals generally  and  to  the  Bill  of  Rights  which  protects  the  right 
of  all  to  dissent  politically. 

"  '  It  is  a  mocking  irony  that  this  committee  conducts  its  hearing 
during  the  week  set  aside  as  Bill  of  Rights  "Week.  However,  in  an- 
other sense  it  is  perfectly  fitting,  since  our  democratic  rights  to 
freedom  of  speech,  worship,  press,  assembly  and  freedom  of  per- 
sonal and  political  association  were  established  and  reestablished 
in  resisting  just  such  committees  throughout  our  nation's  history. 
It  is  for  this  reason  that  the  great  scientist,  Einstein,  speaks  of 
"  *  *  *  the  duty  of  refusing  to  cooperate  in  any  undertaking  that 
violates  the  constitutional  rights  of  the  individual.  This  holds  in 
particular  for  all  inquisitions  that  are  concerned  with  the  private 
life  and  the  political  affiliations  of  the  citizens.  Whoever  cooperates 
in  such  a  case  becomes  an  accessory  to  acts  of  violation  or  invalida- 
tion of  the  Constitution." 

"  '  It  is  with  a  deep  sense  of  pride,  therefore,  that  I  do  my  duty 
and  follow  in  the  historic  American  tradition  of  resistance  to  politi- 
cal compulsion.'  " 

TESTIMONY  OF  ROSE  BOYD 

"Q.  (By  Mr.  Combs)  :  Will  you  please  give  your  name  and  address 
for  the  record  ? 

"A.  Rose  Boyd,  10756  Ashby  Avenue,  Los  Angeles. 

"Q.  Is  it  Mrs.  Boyd? 

"A.  I  am  unmarried  now. 

' '  Q.  Were  you  at  one  time  married  to  Vischner  Boyd  ? 

"A.  No,  but  I  was  married  to  Visscher  Boyd. 

' '  Q.  Was  he  an  architect  ? 

"A.  You  would  have  knowledge  of  it.  Senator  Burns,  in  view  of  the 
procedure  with  the  other  witnesses  may  I  also  ask  that  this  statement 
of  mine  be  received  by  the  committee  and  entered  into  the  record  ? 

' '  Chairman  Burns :  May  I  see  it,  please  ?  Let  the  record  show  that  the 
witness  has  presented  a  statement.  The  chair  will  rule  that  it  may  be 
included  in  the  record  and  marked  as  the  committee's  exhibit  for  this 


194  UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

witness,  next  in  order.  (The  document  was  marked  Committee's  Exhi- 
bit 14.) 

"Q.  (By  Mr.  Combs)  :  Mrs.  Boyd,  do  you  have  an  occupation  or 
business  ? 

"A.  Yes.  I  am  a  life  insurance  agent. 

' '  Q.  For  the  Manhattan  Life  Insurance  Company  ? 

' '  A.  For  a  number  of  companies,  both  life  and  disability. 

"  Q.  Is  that  one  of  them  ? 

"A.  That  is  one  of  them. 

1 '  Q.  Have  you  given  us  your  business  address  ? 

"A.  No,  but  I  can. 

"Q.  Will  you,  please? 

"A.  215  West  Fifth  Street,  Room  1012. 

' '  Q.  You  were  at  one  time  the  wife  of  Visscher  Boyd  ? 

"A.  Yes,  I  was. 

'  •  Q.  Was  he  an  architect  by  profession  ? 

"A.  Yes,  he  was. 

' '  Q.  Did  you  at  one  time  reside  in  Philadelphia  ? 

"A.  I  am  trying  to  think  this  through.  When  I  have  come  to  my 
conclusion  I  will  speak. 

"Chairman  Burns:  Take  your  time. 

"The  Witness:  Yes,  I  lived  in  Philadelphia. 

"Q.   (By  Mr.  Combs)  :  Did  you  reside  there  in  1937? 

"A.  I  am  trying  to  remember.  Yes,  I  was  living  there  at  that  time. 

"Q.  In  that  year  did  you  come  to  California? 

' '  A.  Yes,  I  lived  here  at  that  time. 

"Q.  When  you  lived  here  were  you  placed  in  contact  with  or  did  you 
meet  a  man  by  the  name  of  Max  Silver  ? 

"A.  Your  question  is  did  I  have  any  association  with  a  man  named 
Max  Silver  ? 

"Q.  In  1937. 

"A.  1937? 

"Q.  Yes. 

"A.  To  my  knowledge  this  man  is  one  who  has  been  associated — 
this  is  the  first  time  I  have  heard  it  with  this  committee,  but  with  other 
committees  and  one  who  is  in  a  position  of  informing  on  other  people, 
at  this  point  I  claim  the  privilege  of  constitutional  guarantees  against 
degrading  myself  by  any  answer  to  this  question. 

"Q.  By  admitting  any  association  or  contact  with  him? 

"A.  By  admitting  any  association — not  only  because  it  tends  to 
degrade  me,  but  also  I  take  the  privilege  of  the  First  Amendment  to  the 
United  States  Constitution,  which  grants  me  unabridged  rights  of  as- 
sociation, free  speech  and  free  press.  I  also  at  this  time  invoke  the 
privilege  of  the  Fifth  Amendment  to  the  United  States  Constitution 


UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  195 

and  also  the  comparable  provisions  in  the  State  Constitution,  Article  I, 
Section  13,  which  actually  draws  no  inference  of  guilt,  however,  it 
specifies  that  one  shall  not  be  compelled  to  be  a  witness  against  one's 
self. 

"Q.  In  a  criminal  proceeding. 

"A.  You  are  not  putting  words  in  my  mouth  I  hope. 

"Q.  All  right. 

"A.  I  stated  it  this  way;  I  would  like  to  state  it  in  the  record  this 
way. 

' '  Q.  You  may  consult  with  your  counsel. 

"A.  Thank  you,  sir. 

' '  Chairman  Burns :  Counsel,  I  think  we  got  a  little  bit  away  from  the 
question.  The  question  was,  did  she  ever  meet  the  individual  ? 

"Q.  (By  Mr.  Combs)  :  Do  I  understand  your  answer  to  be  this,  Miss 
Boyd,  that  you  decline  to  admit  any  contact  or  association  of  any  kind 
with  the  person  whose  name  I  have  mentioned,  Max  Silver? 

"A.  I  have  neither  admitted  nor  denied.  I  refuse  to  be  degraded. 

1 '  Q.  Do  you  refuse  to  answer  that  question  on  the  grounds  specified  1 

"A.  On  the  grounds  I  stated. 

"Q.  All  right.  Is  it  not  a  fact  that  the  purpose  of  your  trip  from 
Philadelphia  to  California  in  1937  was  to  assist  the  Communist  Party 
of  Los  Angeles  County  in  raising  funds  for  the  Daily  People's  World? 

"A.  By  the  very  nature  of  your  statement,  the  way  you  put  it,  and 
the  intent  of  this  committee — I  could  speak  of  why  I  came  to  California 
generally,  but  the  way  you  pose  this  question  already  brings  it  in  an 
area  where  I  must  refuse  to  answer  it  and  stand  on  the  constitutional 
grounds  previously  stated. 

"Q.  That  you  have  already  specified? 

"A.  That  is  right. 

"Q.  Were  you  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party  when  you  came 
to  California  from  Philadelphia  in  1937  ? 

"A.  Same  answer. 

' '  Q.  For  the  same  reasons  ? 

"A.  For  the  same  reasons. 

"Q.  Is  it  not  a  fact  that  you  were  a  charter  member  of  the  Commu- 
nist Party  of  the  United  States  ? 

"A.  Now,  really.  The  same  answer,  the  same  reasons. 

"Q.  At  one  time  you  did  secretarial  work  in  New  York  for  Earl 
Browder  ? 

"A.  Same  answer,  for  the  same  reasons. 

"Q.  Is  it  not  a  fact  that  you  were  a  coordinator  for  the  testimonial 
dinner  to  the  Keverend  Stephen  Fritchman  which  was  held  April  10, 
1954,  in  Los  Angeles  at  the  Park  Manor? 


196  UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

"A.  We  live  in  such  a  strange  world.  It  is  so  topsy-turvy.  In  posing 
a  simple  question,  one  which  normally  in  social  relations  one  answers 
simply,  but  by  posing  that  question,  our  life  is  no  longer  simple.  It  is 
not  a  simple  thing.  Here  we  are  living  in  an  atmosphere  where  knowing 
other  people  already  brings  us  within  an  area  of  possible  prosecution. 
You  are  speaking  about  a  dinner.  All  of  us  go  to  various  testimonial 
dinners.  This  did  not  have  any  onus  in  itself,  but  by  the  very  thought 
that  this  committee  for  the  last  two  days — I  have  read  the  reports — 
already  has  indicated  the  name  of  Mr.  Stephen  Fritchman,  then  the 
context  of  one  who  has  appeared  before  various  committees — already 
you  have  put  me  in  a  position  where  I  have  the  highest  regard  for  this 
man  as  a  great  humanitarian,  one  who  has  actually  in  past  years  given 
courage  and  heart  to  people  who  want  no  part  of  war,  who  has  given 
heart  and  courage  to  people  in  every  field  of  their  endeavor,  their 
humanitarianism — this  man  has  been  pilloried,  and  by  the  fact  that  he 
has  been  so  pilloried,  as  I  said  before,  in  a  single  contact  in  a  testimonial 
you  have  put  me  in  a  position  where  I  must  deny  or  refuse  to  answer 
any  questions  with  respect  to  such  a  dinner  and  with  respect  to  such 
a  man  because  you  have  specified  that  he  is  already  considered  with 
contumely.  This  is  a  mad  world. 

"Q.  Will  you  answer  the  question? 

"A.  I  decline  to  answer  on  the  constitutional  grounds  previously 
stated. 

"Chairman  Burns:  Pardon  me.  Who  do  you  think  it  would  hurt 
most,  you  or  him,  if  you  stated  you  were  at  the  dinner  ? 

"The  Witness:  I  will  tell  you  this,  Senator  Burns.  When  the  question 
arises  who  may  be  hurt  most,  myself  or  someone  else,  this  is  the  very 
nature  of  the  stool  pigeon  psychology.  When  an  informer  comes  before 
the  committee  he  has  already  made  up  his  mind  that  he  will  be  hurt 
less  by  turning  against  his  fellow  man.  He  has  had  this  struggle  in 
his  own  mind  no  doubt  before  he  appeared.  He  had  to  make  a  decision : 
whom  will  it  hurt  most?  Frankly,  it  might  hurt  me  most,  but  that  is 
not  my  consideration.  My  consideration  is  that  any  point  where  a 
person  says,  'shall  all  those  things  I  hold  dear' — I  have  a  son  and  I  will 
want  to  raise  him  with  a  sense  of  basic  ethics  where  the  question  of 
right,  wrong,  justice  and  injustice  are  clear  in  his  mind.  If  at  this  time 
it  is  put  to  me,  '  whom  will  it  hurt  most, '  you  are  asking  me  to  say,  '  if  I 
admit  all  this,  and  perhaps  I  can  get  away  with  naming  this  person  or 
the  next  person  because  I  will  be  in  the  clear,'  this  has  never  been  a 
decision  for  me.  This  has  already  been  something  by  which  I  have  lived 
and  that  is,  never  will  I  inform  on  other  people  and  never  will  I  put 
my  personal  gain  or  personal  welfare  above  the  welfare  of  a  group. 
(Applause) 


UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  197 

"Chairman  Burns:  You  were  not  asked  to  inform  on  anyone.  Now, 
let  me  admonish  the  audience.  You  are  here  as  guests.  If  there  are  any 
further  demonstrations  we  will  conduct  the  rest  of  the  meeting  in  secret 
session.  If  you  like  to  be  here,  conduct  yourselves  as  ladies  and  gentle- 
men. Any  further  demonstrations  from  this  point  will  result  in  closed 
sessions  from  now  on. 

"Q.   (By  Mr.  Combs)  :  Mrs.  Boyd,  was  your  maiden  name  Rubin? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  Do  you  know  a  person  named  Rena  Marie  Vale? 

"A.  In  this  case  I  must  say  that  Rena  Vale — I  didn't  know  her  first 
name,  but  Rena  Vale — 

"Q.  Rena  is  her  first  name. 

"A.  It  is? 

"  Q.  It  is.  Rena  Marie  Vale. 

"A.  Rena  Marie  Vale  has  been  an  informer  for  the  Tenney  Com- 
mittee, your  previous  committee.  I  know  her  as  such  a  person.  There- 
fore I  will  not  admit  to  any  direct  association  with  her,  as  it  would 
tend  to  degrade  me,  plus  the  various  constitutional  amendments  I  have 
previously  stated. 

' '  Q.  Are  you  aware  of  the  fact  that  Rena  Marie  Vale  identified  you 
as  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party  and  stated  in  a  sworn  statement 
that  she  was  in  the  Communist  Party  at  the  same  time  you  were? 

"A.  Is  that  a  question  or  a  statement? 

"Q.  It  is  a  question.  I  said,  are  you  aware  of  the  fact  that  she  did 
make  such  a  statement  about  you? 

"A.  I  decline  to  answer  that  on  the  same  grounds  for  the  same 
reasons. 

"Q.  Are  you  aware  of  the  fact  that  other  witnesses,  including  Mr. 
Silver,  have  testified  that  you  were  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party  ? 

' '  A.  For  the  same  reasons  previously  stated  I  decline  to  answer  that 
question. 

"Mr.  Combs:  That  is  all. 

"Mr.  Branton:  May  the  witness  be  excused? 

"Chairman  Burns:  The  witness  may  be  excused. 

STATEMENT  SUBMITTED  BY  THE  WITNESS  ROSE  BOYD 
"I  feel  privileged  to  be  identified  with  those  doctors  who  protest 
this  committee's  invasion  of  their  basic  rights,  as  professional  men 
and  citizens. 

"I  have  the  highest  regard  for  individual  members  of  the  medical 
profession,  but  I  share  with  the  great  numbers  of  laymen  a  contempt 
for  the  money-grubbing  that  characterizes  organized  medicine;  for 
its  callousness  toward  the  social  needs  medical  science  should  serve; 
and  particularly  for  subverting  the  very  essence  of  the  Hippocratic 


198  UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

Oath  and  making  a  mockery  of  it  through  practicing  medicine  as  a 
lucrative  business  instead  of  as  a  human  science. 

"This  committee  (and  their  medical  stooges)  are  not  after  these 
doctors  alone — it  is  we,  the  patients,  present  and  prospective,  that 
they  are  after.  This  is  the  gravy  train  that  the  committee  wants  to 
reward  their  'counterespionage  agents'  with.  They  want  to  destroy 
low-cost  clinics,  prepaid  medical  and  hospital  group  panel  practice. 
But  the  American  people  are  not  fooled.  Each  year  finds  greater  num- 
bers being  covered  under  the  many  excellent  prepaid  health  plans 
now  in  existence. 

"The  day  is  past  when  these  people  will  fall  for  trumped  up 
charges  of  'Communism'  and  'socialized  medicine.'  They  know  how 
well  served  they  are,  who  only  could  afford  emergency  care  before. 
They  won't  readily  go  back  to  the  alternative  of  entering  a  doctor's 
office  to  find  the  cash  register  in  his  right  hand  while  he  wields  a 
scalpel  on  his  patients  with  the  left. 

"This  committee  seeks  to  destroy  the  letter,  the  spirit  and  the  very 
intent  of  the  Bill  of  Rights,  even  as  we  honor  this  document  this  week. 
But  our  founding  legislators  planned  well  and  wisely.  They  knew  that 
each  generation  would  find  bigots  who  would  work  to  destroy  this 
heritage,  but  they  also  knew  that  each  generation  would  produce 
patriots  to  defend  the  Bill  of  Rights  in  its  entirety." 

TESTIMONY  OF  KEN  HARTFORD 

"Q.   (By  Mr.  Combs)  :  Please  give  us  your  name  and  address. 

"A.  Ken  Hartford,  4831  Arlington  Avenue,  Los  Angeles. 

"Q.  What  is  your  business,  Mr.  Hartford? 

"Mr.  Branton:  Prior  to  that,  Mr.  Combs,  the  witness  has  a  statement 
to  file. 

"The  Witness:  Mr.  Chairman. 

' '  Chairman  Burns  :  Yes,  sir. 

' '  The  Witness :  I  would  like  to  file  a  statement  with  the  committee. 

' '  Chairman  Burns :  Let  the  record  show  that  the  witness,  Mr.  Ken 
Hartford,  presents  to  us  a  statement  which  will  be  incorporated  in 
the  record  and  marked  as  the  committee's  exhibit  next  in  order. 

"Q.   (By  Mr.  Combs)  :  What  is  your  occupation,  Mr.  Hartford? 

"A.   I   am  an  administrator. 

"Q.  Where  are  you  employed? 

"A.  Mr.  Chairman,  as  I  have  read  the  reports  in  the  newspapers 
of  these  hearings,  certain  witnesses  here  have  made  various  attacks  on 
institutions  in  this  community.  These  institutions  as  usual  have  been 
named  and  it  has  been  suggested  that  perhaps  they  are  under  scrutiny. 
The  committee  has  indicated  in  the  press  that  there  are  several  such 
organizations  or  institutions  which  are  being  investigated,  or  I  believe 


UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN  CALIFORNIA  199 

the  term  was  'are  under  scrutiny'  by  this  committee.  So  while  I  am 
very  proud  of  the  organization  with  whom  I  may  work,  I  feel  some- 
what like  Alice  in  Wonderland:  everything  is  upside  down. 

"Q.  You  don't  look  like  Alice  in  Wonderland. 

"A.  You  don't  have  to  look  like  someone  to  feel  like  they  do. 
Senator  Burns  doesn't  look  like  the  Queen  of  Hearts,  but  I  would  put 
him   in   that   category. 

"Chairman  Burns:   Thank  you.    (Laughter.) 

"Mr.  Combs:  A  little  laughter  once  in  a  while  in  a  hearing  of  this 
type   is  refreshing. 

' '  The  Witness :  Yes,  sir.  I  think  there  could  be  a  little  more.  I  invoke 
the  constitutional  privileges  which  I  will  name  in  a  few  minutes,  but 
I  feel  first  I  must  explain  why  I  do  so. 

"I  sit  here — I  was  amazed — I  suppose  I  shouldn't  be  by  this  time 
because  after  all  this  committee  has  been  in  existence  for  16  years  by 
the  admission  of  its  chairman.  The  House  Committee  on  Un-American 
Activities  has  been  in  existence  for  a  long  time.  I  see  things,  values 
which  I  was  taught  as  a  child  and  which  I  came  to  revere  and  to  respect 
in  the  United  States  and  to  which  lip  service  is  still  given — I  see 
them  turned  on  every  day.  Take  for  example  the  Fifth  Amendment  to 
the  Constitution.  What  this  committee  says,  at  least  to  the  press,  or  at 
least  as  it  is  reported  in  the  press  and  which  they  would  have  people 
believe,  that  Tom  Jefferson,  Washington  and  Hancock  and  the  other 
drafters  of  our  Constitution — 

' '  Mr.  Combs :  May  I  interrupt  you  for  a  moment,  Mr.  Hartford  ? 

"The  Witness:  Yes. 

' '  Mr.  Combs :  Are  you  reading  from  a  prepared  statement  ? 

"A.  No,  I  am  not.  If  you  want  to  read  it,  you  may. 

"Q.  Is  this  in  response  to  a  question,  or  is  this  a  gratuitous  contribu- 
tion of  yours? 

"A.  This  is  in  response  to  the  question,  explaining  why  I  must  do 
what  I  have  to  do,  even  though  it  would  be  normally  something  which 
anyone  would  be  proud  to  do. 

"Q.  Why  don't  you  answer  the  question  and  then  give  your  explana- 
tion, which  is  the  usual  practice  1 

"A.  I  am  afraid  if  I  answer  the  question  first  you  would  shut  me  up. 
Frankly,  I  am  sure  you  are  no  friend  of  mine.  You  have  made  that 
very  clear. 

"Q.  Again  I  suggest,  sir,  that  you  either  refuse  to  answer  the  ques- 
tion, giving  such  grounds  as  you  wish  to  give,  and  then  if  you  wish 
to  give  an  explanation  within  reasonable  bounds  I  am  sure  the  com- 
mittee will  have  no  objection. 


200  UN-AMERICAN    ACTIVITIES   IN   CALIFORNIA 

"A.  What  I  am  arriving  at,  Mr.  Combs,  is  the  fact  of  this  constant 
allegation  or  allusion  to  incrimination  in  relation  to  the  Fifth  Amend- 
ment. The  people  who  drew  up  our  Constitution,  if  we  believed  you, 
were  interested  in  protecting  the  guilty,  in  protecting  outlaws.  The 
people  who  drew  up  the  Constitution  of  the  State  of  California,  if  we 
believed  you,  were  interested  in  protecting  outlaws,  but  I  don't  think  so. 

"  Q.  If  you  believed  who  ? 

"A.  Believed  you  and  Senator  Burns,  because  you  always  say  if  a 
person  invokes  the  Fifth  Amendment  you  imply  they  are  thereby  guilty. 

"Chairman  Burns:  You  imply  that  you  may  suffer  incrimination. 

"The  Witness:  I  may  suffer  incrimination,  but  that  incrimination 
may  be  completely  unfounded,  unjustified,  and  come  under  the  head 
of  persecution,  but  not  legitimate  incrimination. 

' '  Chairman  Burns :  That  is  your  viewpoint.  You  are  entitled  to  that 
and  we  will  let  you  have  that. 

' '  The  Witness :  Gee,  thanks.  I  am  glad  you  feel  that  way. 

"Chairman  Burns:  This  is  a  duly  constituted  government  agency 
seeking  information.  We  want  to  know  something  about  various  or- 
ganizations existing  in  Southern  California.  If  you  think  it  will  incrimi- 
nate you  to  tell  us  about  them,  that  is  one  thing,  but  don't  put  a  state- 
ment into  our  mouths  that  we  think  it  does.  We  can't  accept  that  as  a 
fact.  If  someone  asks  if  I  stole  some  money  and  I  say,  'I  won't  answer 
because  it  may  incriminate  me,"  incriminate  me  against  what?  In- 
criminate me  against  prosecution  for  stealing  the  money  ?  Let 's  not  have 
any  more  speeches.  Let's  get  along  with  the  hearing. 

' '  The  Witness :  I  don 't  know  what,  but  I  feel  that  incrimination  is 
definitely  there  and  there  is  a  link  to  possibly  incriminate  me  even 
though  as  far  as  I  am  concerned  I  know  I  have  done  no  wrong. 

"Chairman  Burns:  If  you  feel  you  have  done  no  wrong  then  you 
should  have  no  hesitancy  about  answering  the  questions. 

"The  Witness:  I  certainly  have  if  someone  will  twist  what  I  say 
and  bring  an  unjust  prosecution  against  me.  I  want  to  avoid  that  if  I 
possibly  can. 

"Chairman  Burns:  All  right.  Let's  get  back  to  the  question.  Who 
was  your  employer?  Is  that  the  question,  who  was  your  employer?  Do 
you  refuse  to  answer  that  question  on  the  same  grounds?  If  you  do, 
say  so. 

' '  The  Witness :  I  was  explaining  before  the  reasons  for  my  grounds. 

"Chairman  Burns:  Do  you  refuse  to  answer  the  question? 

"The  Witness:  The  previous  witness — I  feel  I  am  entitled  to  explain 
this.  After  all,  this  is  a  public  hearing.  The  press  is  here. 

"Chairman  Burns:  What  are  you  going  to  explain? 


UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES   IN    CALIFORNIA  201 

' '  The  Witness :  I  was  going  to  explain  the  grounds  for  which  I  refuse 
to  answer  the  question. 

"Chairman  Burns:  You  can  answer  the  question  first  and  then,  if 
you  wish,  give  the  reason  for  it. 

■ '  The  Witness :  All  right.  I  decline  to  answer  it  on  the  following 
grounds,  on  the  grounds  that  the  Fifth  Amendment  of  the  United  States 
Constitution,  which  was  written  to  protect  the  innocent ;  the  grounds  of 
the  First  Amendment  of  the  Constitution,  which  gives  me  the  free 
right  of  association  and  belief;  the  grounds  of  Article  I,  Section  13, 
which  gives  me  the  same  rights  as  being  a  witness  against  myself. 

"Chairman  Burns:  Thank  you  very  much.  That  did  not  take  too 
much  trouble,  did  it  ? 

"  Q.   (By  Mr.  Combs)  :  Is  that  the  answer  ? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  Is  it  not  a  fact  that  you  are  the  Director  of  the  Community 
Medical  Center? 

"A.  The  Community  Medical  Center,  as  I  have  heard  of  it,  is  an  or- 
ganization which  is  promoting  prepaid  plans,  low  cost  medical  care.  I 
know  from  the  press,  at  least  I  am  led  to  believe  from  the  press,  that  this 
is  one  of  the  organizations  which  the  county  medical  association  hier- 
archy, the  Cadillac  clique,  it  was  mentioned  here  before,  wants  to  get 
and  which  this  committee,  if  I  am  to  judge  by  the  press  report,  is  acting 
as  hatchet  man  to  help  get.  I  will  not  assist  this  committee  in  trying  to 
destroy  an  inter-racial  health  center,  one  of  the  few  health  centers  in 
the  city  that  is  inter-racial,  that  is  trying  to  do  a  job  of  providing  low 
cost  medical  care  to  people  in  the  lower  income  brackets.  I  therefore 
decline  to  answer  this  question.  Furthermore,  I  think  the  Community 
Medical  Center,  I  know  has  already  been  mentioned  here,  it  has  already 
been  said  it  is  under  scrutiny.  I  know  the  reasons  for  this,  as  I  stated 
before.  Therefore,  I  must  decline  to  answer  for  the  reasons  previously 
stated. 

"  Q.  Is  it  not  a  fact  that  in  the  summer  of  1946  you  were  an  instruc- 
tor at  the  People's  Educational  Center  in  Los  Angeles? 

"  A.  I  must  decline  to  answer  that  question  on  the  same  grounds. 

"Chairman  Burns:  Just  a  minute.  Counsel,  I  would  like  to  enter 
into  a  stipulation  with  you :  in  each  and  every  instance  where  the  wit- 
ness declines  to  answer  a  question,  on  whatever  grounds  he  has  given, 
in  order  to  save  time  I  would  like  you  to  agree  to  a  stipulation  that  the 
chair  deems  his  reasons  insufficient  and  instructs  him  to  answer  the 
question. 

"Mr.  Branton :  I  will  be  willing  to  stipulate  on  behalf  of  ray  client 
that  whenever  he  declines  to  answer  a  question,  if  he  so  does,  that  it 
will  be  deemed  that  he  declines  to  answer  on  constitutional  grounds 


202  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

which  were  given  in  the  declination  to  the  first  question.  However,  as 
to  the  second  part  of  the  stipulation,  I  am  reluctant  to  do  so  because 
this  would  be  an  all-inclusive  stipulation  and  there  may  be  some  ques- 
tions which  are  very  material  and  relevant  which  I  would  not  like 
to  stipulate  that  you  have  deemed  to  have  asked  him  to  answer  those 
questions.  Sometimes  there  is  a  little  by-play  and  the  question  is  aban- 
doned. For  the  purpose  of  protecting  my  clients  perhaps  every  time 
you  order  them  to  answer  a  question  it  should  be  done  that  way. 

"Chairman  Burns:  Will  you  agree  as  to  the  questions  that  have 
been  propounded  to  him  already  that  he  has  refused  thus  far  to  answer 
— I  don't  think  they  fall  into  the  category  you  mention — that  the 
grounds  for  refusing  to  answer  are  deemed  insufficient  and  the  witness 
is  instructed  by  the  chair  to  answer  the  questions?  Do  you  wish  the 
reporter  to  read  it  back? 

"Mr.  Branton:  Is  the  chair  saying  he  rules  that  the  grounds  are 
insufficient  as  to  all  past  questions  which  have  been  asked? 

' '  Chairman  Burns :  Yes. 

"Mr.  Branton:  I  don't  know  what  the  questions  were. 

' '  Chairman  Burns :  Let 's  see  if  we  can  have  them  read  back. 

' '  Mr.  Combs :  I  might  paraphrase  the  questions.  The  first  one  was 
as  to  his  occupation,  which  he  answered.  The  next  question  was  the 
place  of  his  present  employment,  which  he  declined  to  answer.  The 
next  question  was  whether  or  not  it  was  a  fact  that  the  place  of  his 
employment  presently  was  the  Community  Medical  Center,  which  he 
has  also  declined  to  answer.  The  next  question  was  whether  or  not 
in  1946  he  was  an  instructor  at  the  People's  Educational  Center,  which 
he  also  declined  to  answer.  Does  that  bring  us  up  to  date? 

"Mr.  Branton:  Will  you  stipulate  his  declination  to  answer  all  those 
questions  was  on  each  of  the  constitutional  grounds  that  he  has  given? 

' '  Chairman  Burns :  Yes. 

' '  Mr.  Branton :  I  will  stipulate  as  to  each  of  those  questions  that  the 
chair  has  ordered  him  to  answer  the  question. 

' '  Chairman  Burns :  Very  well,  and  that  the  reasons  given  are  insuffi- 
cient. 

' '  Mr.  Branton :  I  will  also  stipulate  that  he  again  refuses  to  answer 
each  of  these  questions  on  the  grounds  previously  stated. 

' '  Chairman  Burns :  Very  well. 

"Q-  (by  Mr.  Combs)  :  The  next  question  is,  Mr.  Hartford,  is  it  not 
a  fact  that  in  the  year  1948,  you  were  an  instructor  in  the  California 
Labor  School  in  Los  Angeles? 

"A.  With  all  due  respect  to  the  California  Labor  School  as  an  outfit 
which  tried  to  do  a  good  job,  I  must  decline  to  answer  for  the  reasons 
previously  stated. 


UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  203 

"Q.  Is  it  not  a  fact  during  the  term  which  commenced  January  24, 
1949,  and  continued  until  April  1  of  that  year  you  taught  a  course 
in  the  California  Labor  School  in  Los  Angeles  concerning  the  develop- 
ment of  the  trade  union  movement  in  the  United  States? 

"A.  I  must  again  decline  to  answer  for  the  same  grounds. 

"Q.  Is  it  not  a  fact  that  during  the  spring  semester  of  1946,  you 
were  the  coordinator  for  the  People's  Educational  Center  in  its  over-all 
activities  ? 

"A.  I  must  again  decline  for  the  same  reasons,  on  the  same  grounds. 

"Q.  Is  it  not  a  fact  during  the  spring  term  of  1950,  you  were  an 
instructor  in  a  class  or  classes  at  the  California  Labor  School  in  Los 
Angeles  and  its  Extension  Division? 

"A.  I  must  decline  for  the  same  reasons  and  on  the  same  grounds. 

"Q.  Is  it  not  a  fact  that  you  were  a  sponsor  for  an  organization  in 
1945,  in  December,  known  as  American  Youth  for  Democracy,  which 
has  been  listed  as  subversive  and  Communist  by  the  United  States 
Department  of  Justice? 

"A.  I  decline  to  answer  on  the  same  grounds. 

"Q.  For  the  reasons  previously  given? 

"A.  For  the  reasons  previously  given. 

"Q.  Is  it  not  a  fact  that  in  July,  1951,  you  were  executive  secretary 
of  the  Community  Medical  Center,  according  to  an  article  which  ap- 
peared in  the  Daily  People's  World  of  December  7,  1951,  page  3,  column  5  ? 

"A.  I  must  again  decline  to  answer  on  the  same  grounds  and  for 
the  same  reasons. 

"Q.  Is  it  not  a  fact  that  you  are  one  of  the  signers  of  a  booklet 
issued  by  the  Arts,  Sciences  and  Professions  Council  in  June,  1951, 
entitled,  Yours  for  a  Genuine  Brotherhood;  which  has  been  referred  to  by 
previous  witnesses  ? 

"A.  I  remember  the  booklet,  I  believe. 

"Q.  Do  you  remember  the  booklet? 

"A.  Yes,  I  do.  I  thought  it  was  a  wonderful  thing  to  further  the 
fight  against  racial  discrimination  in  hospitals  and  other  medical  and 
health  organizations  in  this  community.  However,  I  must  decline  to 
answer  the  question  on  the  grounds  previously  stated. 

"Q.  Have  you  been  affiliated  with  the  Medical  Division  of  the  Arts, 
Sciences  and  Professions  Council  in  Los  Angeles? 

"A.  I  decline  to  answer  on  the  same  grounds. 

"Q.  For  the  reasons  previously  given? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  Are  you  acquainted  with  Dr.  Jack  Flasher? 

"A.  In  view  of  the  fact  that  Mr.  Flasher  has  been  subpenaed 
before  this  committee,  and  in  view  of  the  fact  that  questions  that  were 
asked  were  of  such  a  nature  which  might  imply  that  there  was  a  possi- 


204  UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

bility  of  scrutiny,  shall  we  say,  by  this  committee,  and  possibly  further 
action  in  relation  thereto,  I  must  decline  to  answer  on  the  grounds 
previously  stated. 

' '  Q.  Mr.  Hartford,  have  you  ever  been  affiliated  with  an  organization 
known  as  the  Civil  Rights  Congress,  which,  I  might  add,  has  also  been 
listed  by  the  Department  of  Justice  of  the  United  States  as  a  Commu- 
nist-controlled organization  ? 

"A.  I  assume  that  you  are  referring  to  the  organization,  Civil  Rights 
Congress,  which  has  done  an  outstanding  job  in  protecting  people 
against  inquisitions  such  as  this,  and  against  other  abuses  of  govern- 
mental authority  and  power.  However,  I  must  decline  to  answer  the 
question  on  the  grounds  previously  stated. 

"Q.  Have  you  ever  been  a  member  of  an  organization  know  as  the 
st <itt -wide  Legislative  Conference? 

(The  witness  confers  with  his  counsel.) 

"Q.  You  never  heard  of  it? 

"A.  That  was  not  an  answer.  I  am  entitled  to  know  what  is  it? 

' '  Mr.  Branton :  Privacy  of  counsel. 

' '  Mr.  Combs :  lama  lip  reader. 

"The  Witness:  Is  this  organization  listed  by  anybody  as  being  sub- 
versive or  suspect  ? 

' '  Mr.  Combs :  Many  times. 

' '  The  Witness :  Or  under  scrutiny  ? 

' '  Mr.  Combs :  Many  times. 

"The  Witness:  Well,  again,  Alice  in  Wonderland  has  returned. 
You,  yourself,  have  set  the  basis  that  makes  it  mandatory. 

' '  Mr.  Combs :  You  asked  me  and  I  told  you. 

' '  The  Witness :  I  refuse  to  answer  on  the  grounds  previously  stated. 

"Q.  Did  you  attend  a  meeting  on  December  4th,  last,  at  the  Alex- 
andria Hotel  in  this  city? 

' '  A.  What  meeting  do  you  refer  to  ? 

"Q.  A  meeting  called  the  Citizens  Committee  to  Preserve  American 
Freedom.  It  was  an  evening  meeting  that  started  about  8  or  8.30,  held 
at  the  Alexandria,  and  was  attended  by  many  people,  some  of  whom 
are  under  subpena  at  this  session. 

"A.  Again  you  are  mentioning  an  organization  which  is  carrying 
on  the  best  traditions  of  American  life  and  historical  culture  and  for 
whom  I  think  the  citizens  of  Los  Angeles  should  be  eternally  grateful. 

"Q.  The  organization  I  just  mentioned? 

"A.  Yes,  the  Citizens  Committee.  However,  I  must  decline  to  answer 
on  the  grounds  previously  stated. 

"Q.  Have  you  been  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party  or  the  Com- 
munist Political  Association,  Mr.  Hartford? 

' '  A.  The  same  answer  for  the  same  reasons. 


UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES   IN    CALIFORNIA  205 

"Mr.  Combs:  That  is  all. 

"Mr.  Branton:  May  the  witness  be  excused? 

• '  Chairman  Burns  :  Yes. ' ' 

STATEMENT  SUBMITTED  BY  MR.  KEN  HARTFORD 

' '  Press  stories  regarding  this  hearing  leave  no  doubt  that  there  is 
but  one  reason  why  the  Senate  Committee  on  Un-American  Activities 
could  possibly  summon  me  as  a  witness.  It  is  to  seek  my  assistance  in 
furthering  what  I  consider  to  be  a  conspiracy  on  the  part  of  a  few  top 
leaders  of  the  county  medical  association  for  private  gain  at  the  ex- 
pense of  the  health  interests  of  the  people. 

"Wittingly  or  unwittingly,  the  committee  is  lending  itself  to  a  self- 
seeking  endeavor  by  those  leaders  to  more  firmly  establish  a  lucrative 
medical  business  monopoly  over  the  alleviation  of  pain  and  suffering 
due  to  illness. 

"If  the  aims  of  this  group  are  successful,  those  doctors  and  others  in 
the  health  field  who  are  providing  better  and  lower  cost  medical  care 
through  group  practices,  through  service-type  health  plans  and  other 
methods  to  meet  the  complexity  and  high  cost  of  medical  care,  will  be 
deprived  of  their  license  or  cowed  into  submission. 

' '  Should  this  happen,  it  will  be  the  people  who  foot  the  bill — both  in 
higher  medical  fees  and  lower  health  standards.  Good  medical  care  will 
become  less  available,  especially  to  those  in  minority  and  lower  income 
groups.  This  will  inevitably  lead  to  higher  fees  and  lower  quality  of 
care ;  for  medical  science,  like  any  other  science,  cannot  flower  in  an 
atmosphere  of  political  conformity  and  repression. 

"I  am  not  'friendly'  to  such  a  program,  and  I  will  not  knowingly 
assist  it  in  any  way.  In  fact,  I  will  do  all  within  my  power  to  oppose 
it.  I  will  not  have  any  part  in  establishing  a  de-licensing  mill  wherein 
doctors  who  do  not  kow-tow  to  the  wishes  of  medical  association  leaders 
will  be  shorn  of  their  hospital  appointments  and  licenses.  I  will  not 
participate  in  this  invidious  attempt  to  raise  already  high  medical  fees 
through  the  elimination  of  competition  and  the  killing  of  service-type 
prepayment  plans,  which  have  proved  to  be  the  only  means  whereby 
middle  and  lower  income  groups  can  insure  good  medical  care  for 
themselves. 

"It  is  not  easy  to  be  an  'unfriendly'  witness,  with  the  personal  stigma 
which  currently  attaches  thereto  and  subjects  one's  wife  and  children 
to  the  currility  of  hate  groups  and  vindictiveness. 

"However,  I  will  not  be  an  informer,  a  stool  pigeon  or  a  tool  of  any 
vested  interest,  medical  or  otherwise.  Therefore,  I  must  choose  to  be 
an  'unfriendly'  witness  in  this  investigation  and  to  safeguard  myself 
by  claiming  the  protection  of  the  First  and  Fifth  Amendments  to  the 


206  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

U.  S.  Constitution,  and  Article  I,  Section  13,  of  the  California  Consti- 
tution, for  the  purpose  for  which  they  were  intended — to  act  as  a  shield 
for  the  innocent  against  the  abuses  of  office." 

STIPULATION  CONCERNING  TESTIMONY  OF 
DR.  FRANKLIN  BISSELL,  M.D. 

' '  Mr.  Combs :  Would  you  state  your  name  ? 

"Mr.  Okrand:  Fred  Okrand. 

"Mr.  Combs:  How  do  you  spell  your  name? 

"Mr.  Okrand:  O-k-r-a-n-d. 

"Mr.  Combs:  Mr.  Okrand,  you  are  a  duly  licensed  and  practicing 
attorney,  are  you  not? 

"Mr.  Okrand:  Yes. 

' '  Mr.  Combs :  In  the  City  of  Los  Angeles  ? 

"Mr.  Okrand:  Yes. 

' '  Mr.  Combs :  One  of  your  clients  who  was  under  subpena  to  appear 
here  tomorrow  morning — was  it  10  o  'clock  ? 

"Mr.  Okrand:  Yes. 

"Mr.  Combs:  Was  it  Dr.  Franklin  Bissell? 

"Mr.  Okrand:  Correct. 

"Mr.  Combs:  You  contacted  me  by  telephone  at  the  hotel,  didn't 
you? 

"Mr.  Okrand:  Yes. 

"Mr.  Combs:  You  asked  me  if  we  could  arrange  a  stipulation  for 
reasons  that  you  gave  to  me  at  the  time  concerning  him? 

"Mr.  Okrand:  Yes,  I  did. 

' '  Mr.  Combs :  I  told  you  that  I  could  accommodate  you  by  entering 
into  the  kind  of  stipulation  that  you  and  I  have  just  discussed  ? 

"Mr.  Okrand:  Yes. 

"Mrs.  Combs:  Correct  me  if  I  am  in  error.  The  stipulation  is  this, 
in  substance  :  that  if  Dr.  Bissell  were  here  present,  sworn  and  questioned 
under  oath  and  asked  whether  or  not  he  was  now  or  had  ever  been  a 
member  of  the  Communist  Party,  his  answer  would  be  that  he  declined 
to  answer  the  question  on  the  ground  that  a  truthful  answer  to  the 
question  might  tend  to  incriminate  him,  under  the  provisions  of  the 
Fifth  Amendment  and  the  other  provisions  that  you  are  now  about  to 
mention  ? 

"Mr.  Okrand:  Yes. 

"Mr.  Combs:  And  that  if  I  asked  him  about  meetings  that  he  is 
alleged  to  have  attended,  and  organizations  to  which  he  is  alleged  to 
have  been  affiliated,  such  meetings  and  organizations  having  been 
described  by  any  federal  or  state  agency  as  subversive,  that  his  an- 
swers would  be  that  he  would  decline  for  the  reasons  which  you  are 
about  to  mention  for  the  record.  Is  that  right? 


UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  207 

"Mr.  Okrand:  That  is  correct.  There  is  one  modification,  Mr.  Combs. 
Our  stipulation  is  that  he  would  decline  to  answer  for  these  reasons 

' '  Mr.  Combs :  That  is  correct. 

' '  Mr.  Okrand  :  the  privileges  against  self-incrimination,  Article 

I,  Section  13,  of  the  California  Constitution,  and  the  Fifth  Amendment 
to  the  United  States  Constitution,  the  guarantees  of  freedom  of  speech, 
press  and  assembly,  Article  I,  Sections  9  and  10,  of  the  California 
Constitution,  and  the  First  and  Fourteenth  Amendments  to  the  United 
States  Constitution. 

' '  Mr.  Combs :  Will  you  give  us  your  address  ? 

"Mr.  Okrand:  257  South  Spring  Street. 

"Mr.  Combs:  By  way  of  foundation  I  would  have  asked  Dr.  Frank- 
lin E.  Bissell  whether  or  not  he  was  a  duly  licensed  physician  and  sur- 
geon of  the  State  of  California  and  his  answer,  according  to  the  data 
which  appear  in  the  medical  directory,  would  have  been  in  the  affirma- 
tive; that  he  is  described  in  the  medical  directory,  an  excerpt  from 
which  I  have  before  me,  in  original,  was  that  he  attended  the  Univer- 
sity of  Vienna,  he  graduated  there  in  1932 ;  he  was  born  in  1908 ;  he 
Was  licensed  to  practice  in  California  in  1933 ;  his  business  address  is 
1315  East  Main  Street,  Alhambra,  California.  I  would  have  asked  him 
if  he  is  now  or  has  ever  been  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party  or 
Communist  Political  Association.  And  according  to  the  stipulation  he 
would  decline  to  answer  for  the  reasons  heretofore  given. 

' '  Mr.  Okrand :  May  I  make  one  statement,  Mr.  Combs  ? 

"Mr.  Combs:  Surely. 

"Mr.  Okrand:  As  to  the  answers,  the  correctness  of  your  founda- 
tional questions,  I  have  no  knowledge. 

' '  Mr.  Combs :  The  stipulation  does  not  cover  the  foundation  questions. 

"Mr.  Okrand:  That  is  correct. 

"Mr.  Combs:  I  would  ask  him  whether  or  not  he  has  been  affiliated 
with  the  Medical  Division  of  the  Arts,  Sciences  and  Professions  Council 
in  Los  Angeles,  and  according  to  our  stipulation  he  is  deemed  to  have 
declined  to  answer  the  question  for  the  reasons  heretofore  given. 

"I  would  ask  him  whether  or  not  he  was  a  candidate  in  Alameda 
County  in  1936  on  the  Communist  Party  ticket  for  the  position  of 
supervisor  of  that  county.  According  to  the  stipulation  his  answer 
would  be  that  he  declined  to  answer  for  the  reasons  heretofore  given. 

' '  Mr.  Okrand :  I  had  understood  our  stipulation  had  already  covered 
all  the  questions. 

"Mr.  Combs:  Then  we  won't  need  to  repeat  them. 

"Mr.  Okrand:  You  won't  have  to  repeat  any  of  the  questions. 

' '  Mr.  Combs :  I  wanted  to  get  into  the  record  

"Mr.  Okrand:  I  didn't  understand  that  to  be  a  part  of  the  stipula- 
tion. 


208  UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

' '  Mr.  Combs :  I  have  only  one  more.  The  other  question  was  whether 
or  not  he  had  ever  been  affiliated  with  the  Civil  Bights  Congress. 
According  to  the  stipulation  he  would  have  declined  to  answer  the 
question  for  the  reasons  heretofore  given.  Those  were  the  only  ques- 
tions I  wanted  to  ask.  Is  that  satisfactory? 

' '  Mr.  Okrand :  That  is  in  accordance  with  our  stipulation,  I  believe. 

' '  Mr.  Combs :  Very  well. ' ' 

DR.  MURRAY  ABOWITZ  EXCUSED  FROM  SUBPENA 

"Chairman  Burns:  The  committee  will  please  come  to  order.  Mr. 
Combs,  and  gentlemen  of  the  committee,  Mr.  Robert  Morris  is  here 
making  a  request  in  behalf  of  Dr.  Murray  Abowitz.  The  doctor  is  con- 
fronted with  emergency  work.  His  attorney,  Mr.  Robert  Kenny,  is 
unable  to  be  present  due  to  a  trial  in  San  Francisco. 

"Mr.  Morris,  the  committee  subpenaed  Dr.  Murray  Abowitz  more 
for  the  purpose  of  having  him  available  in  case  he  wished  to  make  a 
statement  of  any  kind,  because  his  name  has  been  brought  up  here  on 
several  occasions.  If  it  is  his  wish,  if  he  does  not  want  to  appear,  it  is 
perfectly  all  right  with  the  committee  that  he  be  excused.  Is  that  in 
accordance  with  your  wishes? 

' '  Mr.  Morris :  Yes,  sir. 

'  >  Chairman  Burns :  Dr.  Abowitz  will  be  excused  from  the  subpena. 
In  the  event  he  desires  at  any  future  time  to  come  back,  he  may  advise 
the  committee. 

' '  Mr.  Morris :  Thank  you  very  much. 

' '  Chairman  Burns :  Mr.  Cohn. 

"Mr.  Cohn:  Yes. 

"Mr.  Combs:  As  long  as  you  are  here  we  might  as  well  put  in  the 
record.  You  and  I  agreed  concerning  your  client,  Dr.  Justin  Frank, 
did  we  not? 

"Mr.  Cohn:  Yes. 

"Mr.  Combs:  We  had  a  conversation  concerning  him.  As  a  matter 
of  fact,  we  had  several. 

"Mr.  Cohn:  That  is  right. 

'  f  Mr.  Combs :  For  reasons  known  to  you  and  to  me,  he  has  been  ex- 
cused from  appearing  at  this  session  of  the  committee.  Is  that  correct? 

' '  Mr.  Cohn :  That  is  correct. 

' '  Mr.  Combs :  Thank  you. 

' '  Mr.  Cohn :  Thank  you. 

"Mr.  Combs:  Mr.  Chairman  and  Members  of  the  Committee — I  have 
just  conferred  with  Mr.  Daniel  Marshall,  who  has  three  clients  who 
were  scheduled  to  testify  today,  one  of  whom  was  subpened,  I  think, 
for  yesterday — I  am  quite  sure  of  that — but  we  moved  it  over  to  this 
morning  to  accommodate  him  and  his  counsel.  I  have  just  examined 


UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  209 

the  records  and  I  find  we  can  call  all  of  them  in  a  group  so  that  Mr. 
Marshall  can  leave  if  he  so  desires. 

"Chairman  Burns:  Very  well. 

' '  Mr.  Combs :  Mr.  Marshall,  I  would  like  to  have  Mr.  Hittelman  tes- 
tify first  if  it  is  satisfactory  with  you. 

TESTIMONY  OF  DR.  JOSEPH  HITTELMAN,  M.D. 

"Q.  (By  Chairman  Burns)  :  Let's  have  your  name,  business  and 
residential  address,  please,  Doctor? 

"A.  Joseph  Hittelman,  M.D.,  6317  Wilshire  Boulevard,  Los  Angeles. 

"Q.   (By  Mr.  Combs)  :  Your  residence  is  where? 

"A.  My  residence  is  5604  Holyoke  Drive,  Hollywood,   California. 

"Q.  Dr.  Hittelman,  you  are  a  physician  and  surgeon,  are  you  not? 

"A.  That  is  true.  I  received  my  degree  here  in  California. 

"Q.  At  the  University  of  California? 

"A.  Yes.  If  you  wish,  I  can  go  right  through  my  educational  back- 
ground very  rapidly.  I  was  born  in  Rochester,  New  York,  December 
25,  1910.  I  came  to  California  in  1920.  That  was  a  long  time  ago, 
before  we  had  smog  here,  as  a  matter  of  fact.  I  was  educated  in  the 
public  schools  of  Los  Angeles.  I  took  premedical  work  at  the  University 
of  California  at  Los  Angeles.  Then  I  went  to  Berkeley,  where  I  received 
my  B.A.  degree  in  1932.  I  received  my  M.D.  degree  in  1936.  I  was  an 
intern  and  resident  in  medicine  in  Mt.  Sinai  Hospital  in  San  Fran- 
cisco from  1935  to  1937.  I  then  returned  to  Los  Angeles  to  enter 
private  practice  of  medicine.  I  practiced  general  medicine  here  until 
1942,  at  which  time  I  entered  the  army  of  the  United  States.  I  served 
here  in  the  States  and  also  in  the  Pacific  theater  of  operations,  Leyte 
and  the  Philippines.  I  was  commanding  officer  of  the  hospital  ship 
Platoon. 

"Q.  What  rank? 

"A.  Captain.  I  was  delegated  to  transport  casualties  back  to  the 
United  States.  My  earlier  duty  was  the  handling  of  psychiatric  casual- 
ties, which  has  left  a  lasting  impression  on  me. 

"Subsequent  to  my  separation  from  the  service  I  returned  to 
private  practice  of  medicine  in  Los  Angeles.  I  then  took  the  op- 
portunity to  take  post  graduate  work  full  time  in  the  Post  Graduate 
School  of  Medicine  at  the  University  of  California  at  Los  Angeles  in 
diseases  of  the  heart  and  circulation.  Subsequently  I  have  specialized 
in  internal  medicine,  with  special  attention  to  diseases  of  the  heart. 
I  am  now  engaged  in  such  private  practice. 

"Q.  Dr.  Hittelman,  did  you  ever  reside  on  Soto  Street  in  Los 
Angeles  ? 

"A.  I  did.  I  had  my  office  there. 

"Q.  Was  that  at  132  North  Soto? 


210  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

"A.  That  is  true. 

"Q.  During  what  years  did  you  reside  there,  to  the  best  of  your 
recollection  ? 

"A.  As  a  matter  of  fact,  in  the  year  1921  we  moved  into  a  house 
on  Soto  Street.  It  was  a  little  two-lane  street.  I  lived  there  and  sub- 
sequently the  property  was  rebuilt.  I  even  opened  an  office  there,  and 
I  lived  at  that  address  from  the  year  1920  or  1921  until  about  seven 
years  ago. 

"Incidentally,  in  the  practice  of  medicine,  ever  since  my  return 
to  Los  Angeles,  I  have  always  been  a  member  of  the  Los  Angeles 
County  Medical  Association.  That  is  a  full  17  years.  I  am  also  a  mem- 
ber of  the  American  Heart  Association,  the  Association  for  the  Ad- 
vancement of  Science,  and  of  course,  the  other  companion  medical 
societies,  such  as  the  State  Medical  Society  and  the  A.  M.  A. 

' '  Q.  Dr.  Hittelman 

"A.  I  did  not  complete  my  qualifications.  I  have  also  passed  the 
written  examination  for  certificate  as  a  specialist  from  the  American 
Board  of  Internal  Medicine.  I  have  yet  to  undertake  the  oral  examina- 
tion. There  may  be  some  vicissitudes  attached  thereto. 

"Q.  Dr.  Hittelman,  have  you  ever  been  known  by  any  name  other 
than  Hittelman? 

"A.  Mr.  Combs,  the  import  of  this  question  certainly  indicates  to 
me  the  purpose  of  this  committee.  It  was  publicized  that  this  com- 
mittee came  to  investigate  infiltration  in  the  county  medical  society, 
and  some  elements  came  up  about  an  election  which  was  had  here  in 
1949,  in  which  I  was  a  candidate.  I  would  like  to  enter  into  that  when 
I  answer  this  question.  The  officers  of  the  county  medical  society  who 
were  responsible  for  my  appearance  today,  which  has  been  stated  in 
the  press,  obviously  have  no  love  for  me.  I  think  the  reason  is  con- 
nected with  that  election.  That  should  be  gone  into  in  detail. 

"Chairman  Burns:  Doctor,  may  I  interrupt  you  a  moment? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  When  you  are  discussing  the  election,  are  you  discussing  the 
election  for  the  association  or  some  political  election? 

"A.  You  see,  this  is  why  this  point  is  so  important  to  me.  This 
particular  election  is  one  which  was  conducted  within  the  Los  Angeles 
County  Medical  Society.  It  was  an  election  in  which  officers  were 
nominated,  the  slate  was  proposed  by  a  nominating  committee  from 
the  association  and  in  which  certain  opposition  candidates,  of  which 
I  was  one,  were  proposed  from  the  floor.  These  opposition  candidates, 
so-called,  were  nominated  in  a  duly  authorized  fashion  from  the  floor 
at  a  meeting,  at  a  general  meeting  of  the  county  medical  society  and 
within  the  framework  of  the  constitution  and  by-laws  of  the  county 
medical  society. 


UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  211 

"I  cannot  understand  why  this  committee  should  go  into  this  par- 
ticular feature  of  intra-society  business,  but  this  committee  has  mani- 
fested a  very  intense  interest  in  this  particular  aspect. 

"Why  did  this  particular  campaign  in  which  candidates  for  almost 
the  first  time  were  put  up  in  opposition  to  the  leadership,  who  have 
made  their  presence  known  here  before,  such  as  Drs.  Sampson,  de  los 
Reyes,  Frees,  the  individuals  who  were  the  top  echelon  leaders  in  the 
county  society,  why  does  that  particular  election  bother  them  so  much  ? 
Why  can't  opposing  views  be  presented  in  an  orderly  fashion  in  the 
manner  in  which  they  were  done  at  that  particular  time? 

"I  think  there  are  certain  features  about  the  election  concerning 
which  there  can  be  no  dispute.  The  nominations  were  carried  out  in 
order.  I  assume  the  ballots  were  sent  out  from  the  office  the  way  they 
should  have  been  and  were  returned  and  counted  in  proper  fashion.  A 
20  percent  vote  was  registered  in  favor  of  the  candidates  nominated 
from  the  floor.  What  is  so  subversive  about  such  an  election  campaign  ? 
Everything  was  out  in  the  open.  Everything  was  carried  through  in 
orderly  fashion. 

"Perhaps  it  is  the  program,  perhaps  it  is  the  desire  on  the  part  of 
the  leadership  of  the  county  society  to  label  people  who  are  in  a  certain 
activity  with  a  certain  name.  Once  they  have  been  given  that  horrible 
name  everything  associated  with  it  becomes  repugnant  in  the  public  eye. 

"I  will  state  in  three  sentences  what  was  the  program  of  the  indi- 
viduals who  were  opposing  the  leadership  in  the  county  society.  There 
were  three  points.  First,  was  to  make  the  association  more  democratic. 
I  think  that  is  a  perfectly  desirable  endeavor. 

"Secondly,  it  was  to  end  discrimination  in  our  hospitals  in  Los  An- 
geles. The  point  was  brought  up  here,  oh,  that  was  just  a  red  herring 
thrown  around,  that  discrimination  does  not  exist,  and  so  forth  and  so 
on.  I  am  sure  the  minority  groups  throughout  the  country  are  aware  of 
the  opposite  being  true,  that  discrimination  has  existed  in  hospitals  in 
the  attitude  toward  minority  group  physicians,  also  in  the  attitude  to- 
ward minority  group  patients.  It  has  existed  in  the  past  and  it  exists 
today.  It  will  continue  to  exist  until  true  democratic  ideals  of  this 
country  come  forward  and  eliminate  it.  It  is  a  part  of  the  same  battle 
that  has  been  going  on  in  the  fire  department.  That  has  been  settled, 
and  this  should  be  settled  in  the  same  fashion. 

"The  third  point  was  to  have  the  association  work  for  humanitarian 
goals  in  the  community  rather  than  to  conduct  merely  a  narrow  pro- 
gram for  the  advancement  of  the  economic  interests  of  its  members. 
That  is  a  very  important  point.  It  is  a  ticklish  situation  with  doctors, 
public  health,  compulsory  health  insurance,  and  so  forth.  They  get  a 
bit  worried  about  the  pocketbook.  That  is  all  right.  Everybody  has  an 
interest  in  his  pocketbook,  but  on  the  basis  of  that  purely  selfish  interest 


212  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

T  don't  think  we  should,  under  any  circumstances,  permit  the  health  of 
the  nation  to  suffer. 

"For  the  reasons  which  I  have  outlined,  those  individuals  whom  the 
officers  of  the  county  society  suspected  with  having  anything  to  do  with 
the  opposition  have  never  been  forgiven.  The  fight  was  a  fairly  good 
fight.  I  think  it  was  almost  a  thousand  members  who  voted  for  these 
members.  How  will  you  label  these  thousand  members  who  voted  for 
those  candidates? 

"Furthermore,  something  else  grew  out  of  that  particular  election 
campaign.  One  of  these  things  was  the  election  last  year,  or  rather  a 
ballot  on  the  amendments  to  the  by-laws  of  the  county  medical  society. 
This  election  was  carried  out  in  December,  1953,  at  which  time  783 
votes  were  cast  against  one  particular  change  in  the  by-laws,  and  these 
783  votes  cast  in  opposition  to  the  demand  for  a  loyalty  oath  upon  new 
applicants  coming  into  the  society,  what  will  we  call  these  783  physi- 
cians who  voted  against  the  loyalty  oath  in  the  county  society  ? 

' '  These  are  some  of  the  points  which  have  not  been  brought  up  here, 
and  I  am  willing  to  go  into  them  with  you  gentlemen.  The  county 
society  has  an  ax  to  grind  in  this  hearing.  When  the  ax  is  sharpened 
it  expects  this  committee  to  use  it  on  the  necks  of  those  who  have 
appeared  here  under  compulsion  and  who  have  voiced  sentiments 
against  these  proceedings.  I  was  anxious  to  get  these  particular  points 
on.  These  hearings  have  been  going  on  since  Monday. 

' '  Mr.  Combs :  We  have  permitted  you  to  do  so. 

' '  The  Witness :  I  am  very  grateful  to  you  for  it.  From  the  statements 
T  have  seen  in  the  press,  in  the  coverage  of  these  meetings,  it  pleases 
me  that  this  committee  has  acted  in  such  a  fair  fashion. 

"Mr.  Combs:  Thank  you,  sir. 

"The  Witness:  There  have  been  other  investigating  committees, 
there  have  been  committees  who  have  taken  the  tone  of  the  junior  Sena- 
tor from  Wisconsin  rather  than  the  tone  taken  here.  If  you  gentlemen 
are  out  for  facts  I  think  this  is  the  way  to  get  them. 

"Mr.  Combs:  Doctor,  I  take  it  you  appreciate  the  subject  with  which 
this  committee  is  concerned  is  not  only  a  rather  challenging  one,  but  it 
has  elements  of  the  controversial  in  it,  it  has  elements  of  sensationalism 
from  time  to  time.  It  is  not  the  easiest  field  for  this  committee  to  func- 
tion in.  Of  course,  we  try  to  be  as  courteous  as  circumstances  will  permit 
and  nevertheless  exhibit  the  courage  necessary  and  take  the  action  that 
will  accomplish  the  end  for  which  we  were  constituted.  Now  let's  get 
back  to  the  question  I  asked  you  a  moment  ago  and  that  was : 

"Q.  Have  you  ever  used  any  name  other  than  the  name  Hittelman, 
and  for  the  purpose  of  making  it  more  explicit  I  will  add  this :  did  you 
ever  go  by  the  name  of  Jack  Martin  ? 


UN-AMERICAX   ACTIVITIES   IN   CALIFORNIA  213 

"A.  Gentlemen,  we  are  not  living-  in  a  vacuum.  There  is  a  certain 
particular  climate  that  we  live  in.  This  question  brings  up  so  many  rami- 
fications that  one  does  not  know  where  they  lead.  As  I  stated  before,  I 
think  the  reason  I  have  been  brought  down  here  is  because  I  opposed 
certain  ideas  in  the  county  medical  society.  To  bring  forth  this  particu- 
lar question  at  this  time  is  something  that  has  been  done  before  and 
it  is  a  technique  that  we  are  all  familiar  with.  As  much  as  I  would  like 
to  answer  it  very  honestly  I  cannot  do  so.  I  do  think  it  is  an  invasion 
of  my  right  to  speak  or  to  remain  silent,  to  make  whatever  associations 
I  want  to.  And  in  this  particular  instance  it  is  pointed  directly  at  me, 
as  I  stated  before,  because  of  this  opposition  to  the  ruling  hierarchy 
in  the  county  medical  society.  For  that  reason  I  can  do  nothing  else 
but  ask  you  gentlemen  again  the  purpose  of  this  committee  here  is  to 
get  at  the  truth  of  why  there  is  this  segment  of  opposition  in  the  county 
medical  society. 

"Q.  I  would  be  very  glad  to  explain  the  reason  for  the  question  at 
this  point,  doctor. 

"Mr.  Marshall:  I  think  the  witness  has  one  more  point  to  make  to 
you.  He  will  be  finished  in  a  moment. 

' '  Mr.  Combs :  All  right. 

"The  Witness:  Because  of  that  particular  reason  and  in  view  of 
the  fact  this  may  stop  getting  at  the  full  reasons  for  this  hearing,  I 
would  suggest  that  the  committee  withdraw  this  particular  question. 
I  am  sure  3*011  want  all  of  the  facts  in  the  case.  This  may  sort  of  stop 
up  the  flow  of  information  which  you  are  anxious  to  get. 

"Mr.  Combs:  Dr.  Hittelman,  j*ou  stated  that  you  suspected  your 
candidacy  for  the  office  in  the  Los  Angeles  County  Medical  Association, 
predicated  on  the  platform  of  the  three  points  which  you  have  enumer- 
ated, and  I  quote  you  now,  which  was,  'out  in  the  open,'  puzzles  you 
because  of  the  resistance  you  met  on  the  part  of  the  then  officers  and 
the  majority  of  members  of  the  medical  association.  Now,  assuming 
that  they  had  reason  to  suspect  or  believe — and  I  don 't  know  that  they 
did — that  you  may  have  gone  under  a  name  other  than  your  own,  to  be 
explicit,  in  the  year  1937,  and  that  you  did  so  to  masquerade  your 
affiliation  as  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party,  would  that  not  answer 
your  question  in  part  as  to  why  your  candidacy  might  have  met  with 
some  resistance ;  and  the  further  reason  for  asking  this  question  is 
because  our  information  is,  and  the  only  way  I  have  of  testing  the 
accuracy  is  to  ask  you,  and  this  certainly  goes  to  the  heart  of  the  cam- 
paign and  the  candidacy  for  the  office  which  you  have  described,  is  that 
your  Communist  Party  name  was  Jack  Martin,  that  you  joined  the 
Communist  Party  in  1937  when  you  were  living  at  132  North  Soto 
Street,  Los  Angeles,  and  that  you  were  attached  to  the  medical  unit 


214  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

in  the  professional  section  of  the  Communist  Party  of  Los  Angeles 
County.  That  is  the  reason  for  the  question. 

' '  The  Witness :  I  still  respectfully  suggest  to  this  committee  that  this 
immediately  changes  the  type  of  hearing  into  the  type  that  I  commented 
about  before  which  are  conducted  under  the  aegis  of  Senator  McCarthy 
from  Wisconsin.  It  is  a  part  of  the  same  old  story  of  20  years  of  treason. 
If  you  don't  like  something,  label  it  and  then  it  becomes  treasonable. 

"I  have  trouble  teaching  my  children  the  meaning  of  words  these 
days.  They  ask  me  what  a  word  means.  You  look  at  the  newspapers. 
It  doesn't  make  sense.  I  said,  'look  at  the  way  Abraham  Lincoln  used 
the  word.  Look  at  the  way  it  is  used  in  the  dictionary. '  That  is  the  only 
way  you  know  words  with  different  definitions  today. 

' '  I  would  like  to  further  state  that  carrying  this  question  along  these 
particular  lines  you  will  eliminate  the  possibility  of  getting  at  the 
bottom  of  this  whole  particular  matter.  I  would  like  to  ask  Mr.  Burns, 
who  is  going  up  to  Sacramento  in  January,  there  will  be  a  lot  of  in- 
formal meetings  about  who  will  get  this  appointment  and  that  appoint- 
ment. On  certain  appointments  to  certain  committees  there  may  be 
individuals  who  dislike  Mr.  Burns,  and  yet  these  individuals  may  be 
willing  to  work  with  him  in  certain  aspects  of  public  power  and  private 
utilities,  and  so  forth,  where  pressure  has  become  very  terrific  on 
individuals.  Mr.  Burns  may  get  somebody  to  work  with  him  in  spite 
of  the  fact  that  that  individual  is  committed  to  private  power  interests, 
let  us  say.  Subsequently,  should  the  committee  be  able  to  compel  Mr. 
Burns  to  divulge  how  these  appointments  were  made  and  how  he  was 
able  to  get  support  from  various  segments  and  individuals  who  might 
be  harmed  by  pressure  groups  if  it  came  out  that  they  were  giving  him 
support.  I  mean,  we  do  not  live  in  a  naive  world.  There  are  certain 
retaliations  that  come  to  individuals  if  we  say  how  things  happen. 
Carry  it  over  to  the  waterfront,  people  can  get  killed  for  opposition, 
if  it  is  known  on  the  part  of  an  individual  that  he  opposed  gangster 
rule  on  the  waterfront.  Some  of  these  things  just  can't  come  out. 

"Mr.  Combs:  Dr.  Hittelman,  may  I  add  this  in  fairness  to  you. 
It  is  also  our  information  that  you  are  not  now  a  member  of  the  Com- 
munist Party  and  you  have  not  been  for  some  time. 

' '  The  Witness :  I  don 't  think  that  is  material  to  the  case  at  all. 

"Mr.  Combs:  We  think  it  is.  I  don't  believe  we  have  an  answer  to 
the  last  question. 

"The  Witness:  If  you  will  insist,  Mr.  Combs, 

' '  Mr.  Combs :  I  think  the  committee  does. 

"Chairman  Burns:  Let  me  say  this,  Doctor.  One  of  the  additional 
criticisms  that  you  overlooked  enumerating  against  this  type  of  com- 
mittee has  been  that  many  people  have  not  had  the  opportunity  to  be 
present  to  verify,  to  affirm  or  deny  various  allegations  or  accusations, 


UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  215 

if  you  want  to  use  that  term,  made  against  them.  You  started  out  very- 
well  in  discussing  the  subject  for  which  we  are  here  this  morning.  In 
fairness  to  you  we  have  told  you  the  information  we  have.  It  would 
be  very  unfair,  and  the  criticism  would  be  justified,  if  we  publicized 
the  information  we  have  without  giving  you  the  opportunity  to  know 
about  it  or  hearing  about  it  and  to  confirm  or  deny  it.  In  fairness  to  the 
committee  and  in  fairness  to  you,  in  order  to  get  all  facts  concerning 
the  subject  which  we  are  investigating,  we  think  that  you  should  answer 
the  question.  If  you  were  known  as  Jack  Martin,  tell  us.  If  you  were 
not,  you  can  say  no.  I  think  it  is  material  to  the  inquiry. 

' '  The  Witness :  May  I  answer  you,  Mr.  Burns.  The  only  way  I  feel 
that  I  can  resist  this  whole  trend  in  American  life  of  giving  something 
a  name  and  then  calling  it  bad  and  the  associating  people  with  that 
name  is  by  the  opposition  here  right  now.  If  the  State  Legislature 
passes  a  law  stating  henceforth  from  this  day  the  color  black  is  green, 
that  doesn't  make  it  green.  This  is  what  is  happening  in  American 
life  today.  Legislative  bodies  pass  a  law  that  if  anybody  says  such  and 
such,  and  such  and  such  and  so  forth  is  so  and  so,  and  from  that  day 
on  he  is  so  and  so.  Anybody  who  has  been  labeled  anything,  anything 
left  of  being  a  Knowland  Republican,  is  a  Communist,  and  that  in- 
cludes Eisenhower.  That  includes  everybody  left  of  Knowland,  McCar- 
thy and  Nixon.  It  is  so  funny  today  that  it  is  certainly  time  that 
individuals  who  are  Democrats  are  very,  very  vulnerable  and  should 
understand  it.  I  am  trying  to  oppose  that  trend  in  American  life. 

"I  am  a  physician.  My  first  duty  is  to  patients.  I  love  the  practice 
of  medicine.  I  think  I  am  a  good  doctor.  But  I  cannot  give  up  my 
citizenship.  I  see  my  patients  influenced  on  every  side  by  social  and 
economic  features.  I  can't  make  an  adequate  diagnosis  unless  I  am 
aware  of  those  impacts  on  their  physical  and  mental  wellbeing,  and  I  am 
dragged  into  this  particular  situation  for  that  reason.  I  am  not  of  that 
group  of  doctors  who  confuse  social  with  socialistic.  That  is  another 
label.  Asking  this  particular  question  is  an  attempt  to  label  me. 

' '  The  statement  was  made  that  you  have  evidence  I  am  not  a  member 
of  the  Communist  Party  now,  and  for  so  many  years.  To  me  that  is 
immaterial  to  the  particular  question  here  because  that  question  in- 
volves labeling.  I  am  sick  and  tired  of  labeling  if  for  no  other  reason 
than  that  I  have  a  heck  of  a  time  explaining  to  my  children  what  words 
mean  which  don't  mean  the  same  thing  they  did  50  years  ago. 

"I  suggest  again  that  you  withdraw  this  particular  question  and  let's 
stick  to  the  issues  of  why  is  the  A.  M.  A.  so  interested  in  getting  the 
Burns  committee  to  carry  the  ball  for  them  on  this  particular  issue. 

' '  Chairman  Burns :  The  committee  believes  the  question  is  material. 
It  is  one  of  the  main  issues  as  to  whether  or  not  you  are  a  member  of 


216  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

the  Cominunist  Party  or  whether  or  not  you  used  this  particular  name. 
The  Chair  will  have  to  direct  you  to  answer  the  question,  Doctor. 

"The  Witness:  Seeing  as  I  have  been  unable  to  convince  the  com- 
mittee that  they  should  have  the  county  medical  association  carry  the 
ball  at  their  own  expense  with  their  own  attorneys — they  are  a  very 
wealthy  organization — but  have  been  able  to  pass  over  to  the  State  and 
have  the  State  carry  it  at  state  expense,  which  I  think  is  a  real  subter- 
fuge, and  because  I  do  respect  the  state  authority,  I  have  been  given 
a  command  to  answer  the  question,  which  I  think  you  have  no  right  to 
ask,  gentlemen,  but  since  I  am  being  forced  to  do  so  I  want  it  under- 
stood that  I  am  doing  it  under  compulsion,  that  this  particular  ques- 
tion again  is  an  invasion  of  my  rights  of  free  speech  because  from 
this  day  on  it  interferes  with  my  inability  to  oppose  the  vested  leader- 
ship in  the  county  medical  society.  It  has  invaded  my  right  guaranteed 
to  me  under  the  First  Amendment  to  the  Bill  of  Rights,  Article  I, 
Section  9,  of  the  Constitution  of  this  State.  Secondly 

"Chairman  Burns:  Are  these  the  grounds  which  you  are  using  for 
refusing  to  answer  the  question? 

> '  The  Witness :  For  refusing  to  answer  this  particular  question. 
Secondly,  it  is  an  attempt  to  deprive  me  of  my  right  to  earn  my  liveli- 
hood. I  think  you  gentlemen  should  understand  that  individuals  who 
come  out  of  this  hearing,  such  as  doctors,  are  now  being  forced  into  a 
position  where  they  are  going  to  have  to  defend  themselves  against 
further  restriction,  perhaps  even  battle  against  the  revocation  of  license 
in  the  future.  If  the  medical  society  can  get  the  committee  to  lay  the 
groundwork  for  that  procedure  I  certainly  expect  them  to  get  the  intro- 
duction of  bills  in  the  forthcoming  Legislature.  Therefore,  this  in- 
volves  

' '  Chairman  Burns :  I  hate  to  say  this,  Doctor,  but  you  are  making 
the  record. 

"The  Witness:  Pardon? 

' '  Chairman  Burns :  I  am  reluctant  to  say  so,  but  you  are  making 
the  record  that  may  be  or  may  have  the  result  of  these  events  you 
are  talking  about.  You  are  making  the  record,  and  not  us. 

' '  The  Witness :  At  this  particular  hearing  ?  It  has  been  in  the  press 
already,  the  whole  purpose  of  the  hearing.  Here  is  what  I  mean, 
Mr.  Burns. 

' '  Chairman  Burns :  You  are  not  helping  us  any  at  all. 

"The  Witness:  You  say  I  am  making  the  record.  The  record  is 
already  made.  The  press  release  stated  the  purpose  of  this  hearing. 

"Chairman  Burns:  I  am  referring,  Doctor,  to  the  chain  of  events 
that  you  are  now  enumerating  in  your  reason  for  refusing  to  answer 
the  question.  It  is  your  record. 


UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  217 

"The  "Witness:  Do  you  mean  my  standing  on  the  Constitution  of 
the  United  States  is  making  a  record  which  will  be  used  against  me  ? 

"Chairman  Burns:  I  don't  know,  but  if  it  is  you  are  making  it, 
not  I. 

■ '  The  Witness :  If  I  am  making  a  record  by  standing  on  the  Consti- 
tution of  the  United  States,  I  am  perfectly  happy  to  get  such  a  record 
down. 

"The  second  reason  is,  under  the  Fourth  Amendment  to  the  Con- 
stitution because  it  will  tend  to  deprive  me  of  my  livelihood,  my  liberty 
and  property  without  due  process  of  law. 

' '  Thirdly,  I  will  also  claim  the  privilege  of  the  Fifth  Amendment  of 
the  Constitution  of  the  United  States,  and  Article  I,  Section  13,  of 
the  Constitution  of  the  State  of  Cailfornia,  as  a  ground  for  refusing 
to  answer  this  question,  which  I  am  very  sorry  you  gentlemen  brought 
up  and  which  I  think  will  hamper  these  hearings  rather  than  help 
them. 

' '  In  addition  to  the  Fourteenth  Amendment  which  I  quoted,  I  believe 
also  Article  I,  Section  13,  of  the  Constitution  of  this  State,  which 
overlaps. 

"On  the  further  grounds  that  this  committee  sits  without  lawful 
authority  and  exceeds  its  valid  powers.  By  that  I  mean  that  this  com- 
mittee by  its  very  action,  and  in  the  present  climate  of  public  opinion, 
is  a  punitive  and  executive  committee  rather  than  a  legislative  one. 
I  think  other  people  have  gone  into  that. 

"Also  on  the  additional  grounds  that  they  have  clearly  come  forth 
as  an  action  of  complicity  between  federal  agencies  and  this  com- 
mittee to  deprive  me  of  my  constitutional  rights  under  the  Fifth 
Amendment. 

"Furthermore,  to  compel  me  to  expose  myself  to  false  prosecution 
for  an  alleged  violation  of  federal  laws.  As  I  stated  before,  the  question 
which  you  asked  of  course  has  no  materiality  or  pertinency  to  any 
lawful  power  of  this  committee. 

"There  is  another  ground  which  I  would  like  to  call  to  your  atten- 
tion, that  buttressing  the  action  of  the  county  medical  society  in  these 
types  of  activities  can  clearly  be  a  violation  of  the  Sherman-Clayton 
Antitrust  Act.  There  are  many  occasions  which  I  think  the  committee 
should  beware  of  wherein  the  American  Medical  Association  has  run 
afoul  of  the  law,  believe  it  or  not. 

"Chairman  Burns:  Wait  a  second  now,  Doctor.  Are  you  all  through 
giving  your  reasons? 

"Mr.  Marshall:  No.  He  is  still  continuing  with  his  reasons,  Senator. 

"Chairman  Burns:  All  right. 


218  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

"The  Witness:  Sometimes  it  might  be  said  the  doctor  gave  these 
reasons  and  in  addition  to  the  Sherman-Clayton  Antitrust  Act  he  threw 
in  the  kitchen  sink.  That  isn't  so  far  fetched  as  it  may  sound.  The 
American  Medical  Association  has  made  it  very,  very  difficult,  I  want 
you  all  to  understand,  for  group  practices,  prepaid  health  insurance, 
voluntary  health  insurance  to  make  its  way  in  this  Country.  The  society 
has  been  acting  in  such  a  situation  which  is  actually  in  restraint  of 
trade  under  those  laws. 

' '  Incidentally,  we  had  a  very  good  example  of  that  in  Los  Angeles  in 
1929,  with  which  you  must  be  familiar.  It  is  the  case  of  the  Ross-Loos 
Clinic.  In  1929,  the  leaders  of  the  Ross-Loos  Clinic  were  thrown  out  of 
the  county  medical  society  because  they  started  a  prepaid  medical  group 
for  the  Department  of  Water  and  Power  employees.  That  was  called 
socialistic,  of  course,  and  every  subsequent  plan  has  been  called  socialistic. 

' '  The  powerful  A.  M.  A.  lobby  in  Washington  is  known  to  every  poli- 
tician. I  am  sure  you  gentlemen  are  familiar  with  the  firm  of  Whitaker 
and  Baxter  in  California.  This  high  priced  advertising  firm  has  been 
carrying  the  ball  for  the  state  society  ever  since  it  succeeded  to  the  ap- 
pointment. One  of  the  leading  figures  in  this  battle  was  an  individual — 
you  heard  him  testify  here  several  days  ago,  Dr.  Alesen,  a  stone  age 
economist 

' '  Mr.  Combs :  That  is  hardly  a  legitimate  reason  for  refusing  to  an- 
swer questions,  Dr.  Hittelman.  While  we  have  been  very  patient,  and  I 
think  quite  tolerant  with  you,  and  have  permitted  you  to  go  into  the 
history  of  litigation  of  the  American  Medical  Association,  and  a  great 
many  other  extraneous  matters,  you  have  accused  us  of  doing  a  few 
extra-curricular  things.  Let  us  see  if  you  and  I  cannot  strike  a  happy 
medium.  Give  us  the  reasons  you  don't  want  to  answer  the  question  and 
we  can  get  on  to  the  next  of  your  counsel's  clients. 

"Mr.  Marshall :  The  doctor  has  one  or  two  more  reasons. 

"Mr.  Combs:  I  don't  doubt  that  he  will,  but  that  doesn't  mean  that 
we  are  going  to  permit  him  to  deliver  a  long  extraneous  explanation  of 
matters  which  are  really  not  legitimate,  legal  reasons  for  refusing  to 
answer  a  simple  question. 

' '  Mr.  Marshall :  I  think  if  you  reflect  on  it  a  moment  you  will  see  that 
it  is  fully  germane  to  the  issue.  What  is  involved  in  this  attack  upon  the 
medical  society  election  is  really  a  contest  between  two  very  different 
ideas  for  the  medical  care  of  the  people  of  this  Nation.  It  is  really  an 
attack  on  such  a  venerable  institution,  and  so  respected  a  proponent  as 
Governor  Warren's  health  bill.  That  is  what  it  amounts  to.  These  are 
germane  issues.  You  are  interested  in  acquiring  this  information,  I  am 
sure. 


UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  219 

1 '  Mr.  Combs :  We  are  interested  in  finding  out  whether  or  not  your 
client  was  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party  under  the  name  of  Jack 
Martin. 

"Mr.  Marshall:  Why? 

"Mr.  Combs:  That  is  the  question. 

1 '  Mr.  Marshall :  Why  is  that  relevant  ?  Would  you  ask  Governor  War- 
ren to  come  in  here  to  explain  his  reasons  why  in  support  of  his  health 
bill  if  he  was  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party  ?  Has  that  anything  to 
do  with  the  issue  ? 

' '  Chairman  Burns :  We  asked  him  once. 

"Mr.  Combs:  We  asked  him  once  and  he  answered  it  very  frankly 
and  very  willingly. 

1 '  Mr.  Marshall :  Governor  Warren  in  the  witness  chair  is  a  different 
person  than  any  other  person  brought  here. 

1 '  Chairman  Burns :  He  was  not  governor  then,  Mr.  Marshall,  but  he 
was  a  witness  before  the  committee  and  I  have  asked  him  the  question. 

"Mr.  Combs:  He  was  on  the  stand  a  half  a  day.  Now  let's  have  the 
reasons  for  the  witness '  refusal  to  answer  the  question,  and  get  on  with 
the  hearing. 

"Mr.  Marshall :  He  will  continue. 

"Mr.  Combs :  We  have  been  very  polite  with  you. 

' '  Mr.  Marshall :  Yes,  and  we  have  been  with  you. 

"Mr.  Combs:  Let's  expedite  it  a  little.  We  have  many  more  witnesses. 

' '  Mr.  Marshall :  For  the  record,  you  will  have  to  agree  that  we  have 
been  equally  courteous  and  polite  to  you. 

' '  Mr.  Combs :  Yes. 

1 '  Mr.  Marshall :  Very  well.  Go  ahead,  doctor. 

' '  The  Witness :  I  don 't  want  the  impression  to  get  across  that  I  think 
the  American  Medical  Association  is  such  a  horrible  organization.  It  is 
just  the  top  level  leadership  of  the  A.  M.  A.  because  their  inhuman  social 
philosophy  has  made  it  a  two-headed  hydra,  on  the  one  hand  that  of 
Aeschelus  and  on  the  other  that  of  a  cigar-smoking  lobbyist  in  Wash- 
ington. I  believe  the  people  should  understand  that.  The  A.  M.  A.  has 
done  a  lot  of  wonderful  things  for  medical  science.  It  has  done  a  lot  of 
good  things  for  the  health  of  the  people,  but  that  is  not  permitting  the 
people  to  get  health  care.  For  that  reason,  the  last  point  I  made  under 
the  Sherman-Clay  Anti-Trust  Act  is  a  valid  one. 

"Mr.  Combs:  Have  you  concluded,  doctor? 

' '  The  Witness :  I  will  conclude  with  this  statement. 

"Chairman  Burns:  Don't  talk  to  Mr.  Marshall  any  more  or  he  will 
think  of  another  reason. 

' '  The  Witness :  I  am  a  physician.  I  am  proud  to  be  a  physician.  I  have 
been  a  member  of  the  county  medical  society  here  for  17  years.  I  don't 
intend  to  leave  the  society.  I  have  a  vested  interest  in  it.  I  will  try  to 


220  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN  CALIFORNIA 

remain  in  it  to  do  what  I  can  to  bring  some  humanity  to  the  organiza- 
tion. I  must  pay  tribute  to  the  thousands  of  doctors  who  belong  to  the 
A.  M.  A.,  who  feel  as  I  do  but  who  have  been  absolutely  inarticulate  in 
their  expression  and  opposition  to  its  policy. 

"Mr.  Combs:  Have  you  concluded,  doctor? 

' '  The  Witness :  One  more  thing.  I  would  like  to  commend  to  this 
committee  a  very  scholarly — 

"Mr.  Combs:  Is  this  one  of  the  reasons  for  refusal? 

' '  The  Witness  :  Yes — an  exhaustive  article  on  the  American  Medical 
Association,  published  in  the  Yale  Law  Journal,  Volume  63,  No.  7, 
May,  1954,  apparently  by  four  attorneys.  It  really  opened  my  eyes 
to  the  situation  I  didn't  know  existed.  It  is  a  real  indictment  of  the 
antisocial  policies  of  the  American  Medical  Association.  As  a  matter 
of  fact,  it  would  be  a  very  good  idea  to  enter  this  whole  article  in  the 
record. 

"Mr.  Combs:  Mr.  Marshall,  may  we  have  the  usual  stipulation?  I 
have  only  two  other  questions  to  ask  your  client.  May  it  be  stipulated 
between  you  and  the  committee  that  in  the  event  he  declines  to  answer 
the  questions  that  the  chair  will  be  deemed  to  have  admonished  him 
that  his  reasons  are  insufficient  and  he  is  directed  to  answer  the  ques- 
tion, and  that  the  reasons  he  has  already  given  for  refusing  to  answer 
this  last  question  be  deemed  applicable  to  the  last  two  questions  I  am 
about  to  ask? 

• '  Mr.  Marshall :  It  will  be  so  stipulated,  it  being  understood  that  the 
witness  in  the  situation  which  you  have  mentioned  will  be  deemed  to 
have  incorporated  by  this  reference  each  and  every  ground  of  declina- 
tion in  refusal  to  answer. 

"Mr.  Combs:  So  stipulated. 

' '  Chairman  Burns :  And  the  witness  will  also  be  instructed  to  answer 
on  the  ground  so  stated  as  not  deemed  to  be  sufficient  by  the  chairman. 

' '  Mr.  Marshall :  We  will  stipulate  the  witness  has  been  instructed  by 
the  chairman  to  answer  the  questions. 

"Mr.  Combs:  Thank  you. 

"Q.  Dr.  Hittelman,  is  it  not  a  fact  that  in  the  year  1937,  you  were  a 
member  of  the  Communist  Party  of  Los  Angeles  County,  Professional 
Section,  Medical  Unit  ? 

"A.  Same  answer  on  the  same  grounds. 

"Q.  Is  it  not  a  fact  that  you  have  been  affiliated  with  the  Medical 
Division  of  the  Arts,  Sciences  and  Professions  Council  in  Los  Angeles  ? 

"A.  Same  answer,  same  grounds. 

"Mr.  Combs:  That  is  all. 

' '  Mr.  Marshall :  Is  the  witness  excused  ? 

"Chairman  Burns:  The  witness  may  be  excused. 


UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  221 

TESTIMONY  OF  DR.  RICHARD  W.  LIPPMAN,  M.D. 

''Chairman  Burns:  Dr.  Lippman,  you  may  be  seated,  give  your 
name  and  address. 

"A.  My  name  is  Richard  W.  Lippman.  Here  is  my  card  with  the 
name  and  address.  (Home  address,  11827  Chaparral  Drive,  Los  An- 
geles 49.  Office  address,  414  North  Camden  Drive,  Beverly  Hills,  Cali- 
fornia). 

"Q.  (By  Mr.  Combs)  :  Would  you  mind  giving  your  educational  and 
professional  background  to  the  committee  as  briefly  as  possible,  please? 

"A.  Yes,  I  would  like  to,  Mr.  Combs.  My  education  was  at  the 
Fieldston  School  in  New  York  City.  After  that  I  received  my  bachelors 
degree  at  Yale  University  in  1936.  "While  there  I  was  elected  to  the 
honorary  scientific  fraternity  of  Sigma  Psi.  I  then  received  my  M.D. 
degree  at  Columbia  University  in  1940.  While  there  I  was  elected  to 
the  honorary  medical  fraternity  of  Alpha  Omega  Alpha.  I  interned  at 
the  Beth  Israel  Hospital  in  New  York  City.  While  still  an  interne  there 
I  volunteered  for  military  service  on  the  day  after  Pearl  Harbor.  I 
spent  four  years  in  service  in  the  Army  Medical  Corps,  two  years 
overseas. 

"Q.  What  rank,  Doctor? 

"A.  I  reached  the  rank  of  Major.  After  separation  from  the  service 
I  became  a  fellow  in  medicine  at  Stanford  University  School  of  Medi- 
cine from  1946  to  1948.  In  May,  1948,  I  came  to  this  city  as  research 
associate  at  the  Institute  for  Medical  Research  at  Cedars  of  Lebanon 
Hospital.  While  at  the  institute  I  held  a  fellowship  of  the  Columbia 
Foundation  from  1949  to  1950.  I  held  a  fellowship  from  the  John 
Simon  Guggenheim  Foundation  in  the  years  1950-1951  and  1951-1952. 
In  recognition  of  my  work  while  there  I  was  elected  to  the  American 
Physiological  Society.  I  was  elected  to  the  Society  for  Experimental 
Biology  and  Medicine.  In  this  society  I  was  a  member  of  the  National 
Council  in  the  year  1951-1952. 

' '  I  was  also  elected  to  the  Western  Society  for  Clinical  Research,  the 
New  York  Academy  of  Scientists,  and  several  other  honorary  societies. 

"I  am  engaged  in  research  concerning  kidney  diseases  and  high  blood 
pressure.  This  was,  I  think,  deemed  by  my  colleagues  to  be  reasonably 
productive.  During  that  period  I  published  more  than  60  scientific 
papers  in  such  recognized  journals  as  the  Archives  of  Internal  Medicine, 
the  American  Journal  of  Medicine,  the  American  Journal  of  Physiology.  I  also 
published  a  book  in  this  special  field. 

"In  December  of  1951,  I  suddenly  received  notice  that  I  had  been 
expelled  from  the  staff  of  Cedars  of  Lebanon  Hospital. 

"Q.  What  was  the  date  again? 

"A.  In  December,  1951.  I  cannot  tell  you  the  exact  date,  but  it  was 
just  about  Christmas  time.  This  expulsion  occurred  without  any  hear- 


222  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

ing,  without  any  reasons  being  given,  and  to  this  day  I  have  not  even 
received  the  courtesy  of  a  personal  notification  that  I  was  expelled. 

"Q.  Did  you  request  a  hearing? 

"A.  I  did  request  a  hearing. 

"Q.  How  did  you  make  that  request,  Doctor? 

"A.  I  sent  a  letter  to  the  board  of  trustees.  The  letter  was  returned 
to  me  because  they  refused  to  accept  it.  Then  I  re-sent  it  by  registered 
mail,  return  receipt  requested.  I  received  a  receipt  that  it  had  been 
received,  but  I  never  received  an  answer. 

"Q.  Did  you  go  out  there  personally  to  insist  on  a  hearing? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  With  whom  did  you  confer  at  that  time? 

"A.  Do  you  mean  with  whom  in  the  hospital,  of  whom  did  I  per- 
sonally request  a  hearing? 

"Q.  Yes. 

"A.  From  the  superintendent  of  the  hospital. 

"Q.  He  was  who  at  that  time? 

"A.  Mr.  Manuel  Weisberger. 

"Q.  Do  you  know  if  he  is  still  there? 

' '  A.  I  think  he  is  still  there.  He  told  me  that  it  was  not  up  to  him. 
After  all,  this  was  three  years  ago.  I  cannot  recall  the  exact  conversa- 
tion, but  he  told  me  it  was  not  up  to  him,  but  that  he  would  transmit  my 
request  to  the  board  of  trustees.  They  apparently  did  not  even  see  fit  to 
answer  my  request. 

"Q.  Do  you  know  that  the  request  was  actually  transmitted  to  the 
board  ? 

' '  A.  Well,  I  know  that  I  have  a  receipt  in  my  possession  for  the  reg- 
istered letter  that  was  addressed  to  the  president  of  the  board  of 
trustees. 

1 '  Q.  Who  was  he  at  that  time  ? 

"A.  At  that  time  Ben  R.  Meyer. 

"Q.  Is  he  still  functioning  in  that  capacity,  do  you  know? 

"A.  I  believe  that  he  has  been  superseded  as  president.  I  would  like 
to  say  this. 

"Q.  Do  you  mind  of  we  explore  that  for  just  a  bit? 

"A.  If  I  may  return  to  my  answer  of  the  original  question. 

"Q.  Of  course.  You  brought  it  up  and  I  thought  this  would  be  a  good 
place  to  do  this  because  we  have  no  other  way  of  getting  that.  I  guess 
we  would  have,  but  this  is  the  better  opportunity. 

"How  long  after  you  received  the  notice  of  dismissal,  to  the  best  of 
your  recollection,  was  it  before  you  went  out  personally  to  talk  to  the 
medical  director? 


UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  223 

"A.  I  tried  to  reach  him.  May  I  tell  you  the  exact  circumstances  of 
how  I  received  the  notice  ? 

"Q.  I  think  so. 

"A.  I  remember  that  very  well.  I  just  came  home  from  work.  The 
phone  rang  about  dinner  time.  A  friend  of  mine,  who  also  worked  at 
the  hospital,  said,  '  Hello,  Dick.  What  is  this  I  hear  about  your  leaving  ? ' 
I  thought  at  first  this  was  kind  of  a  joke.  I  said,  'I  am  not  leaving,  what 
are  you  talking  about?'  He  said,  'Well,  in  the  list  of  the  staff  for  the 
coming  year,  which  has  just  been  distributed  in  the  hospital,  your  name 
is  listed  as  not  to  be  reappointed.' 

1 '  As  you  can  imagine,  this  was  quite  a  shock.  This  was  the  first  inkling 
I  had  that  there  was  any  difficulty  of  any  sort.  I  immediately  called 
several  people  whom  I  knew  to  be  prominent  in  the  hospital  to  find  out 
what  happened. 

"Q.  Do  you  remember  whom  you  called? 

"A.  I  don't  remember  precisely.  I  was  quite  excited  at  the  time. 

"Q.  Had  Dr.  Abowitz  received  a  similar  notification  before  or  about 
that  time? 

"A.  I  think  that  I  was  the  one  who  discovered  that  he  was  also  on 
that  list  because  I  called  someone  who  had  the  list  and  asked  them 
to  check  to  see  who  else  was  not  to  be  reappointed  and  in  that  way  dis- 
covered the  names  of  other  individuals. 

"  Q.  Of  whom  he  was  one  ? 

"A.  Of  whom  he  was  one.  I  tried  to  contact  the  superintendent  of  the 
hospital  immediately,  of  course,  but  because  of  the  holiday  season — I 
think  that  was  the  week  end  directly  after  Christmas  and  it  was  impos- 
sible to  contact  anyone  until  Monday.  I  made  the  earliest  possible 
appointment  to  see  the  superintendent.  I  don't  remember  whether  it 
was  Monday  or  Tuesday,  but  I  got  in  as  fast  as  I  possibly  could. 

"  Q.  It  was  a  matter  of  within  two  or  three  weeks  thereafter  at  least  ? 

"A.  Oh,  a  matter  of  within  two  or  three  days. 

"Q.  All  right.  Would  you  please  continue. 

"A.  I  would  like  to  interject  now  that  it  was  a  mystery  to  me  at  the 
time  because  I  was  never  given  any  choice  or  reasons  whatsoever. 

"I  now  learn  from  previous  testimony  before  this  committee  that 
some  of  the  men  who  have  testified  here,  the  leaders  of  the  county 
medical  association,  Dr.  Sampson,  Dr.  de  los  Reyes,  and  others,  have 
testified  that  they  intervened  with  the  hospitals  to  expel  certain  indi- 
viduals. I  believe  they  mentioned  the  Cedars  in  particular.  At  least  this 
appeared  in  the  press. 

"Q.  I  don't  recollect  that  exact  testimony  at  all,  Dr.  Lippman,  but 
there  was  some  testimony  about  two  individuals  of  the  Cedars  having 
been  identified  with  certain  organizations  before  the  House  Committee 


224  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN  CALIFORNIA 

on  Un-American  Activities,  but  your  name  was  not  included  in  that 
connection. 

"  A.  I  may  be  mistaken  on  this,  but  I  believe  the  newspaper  articles 
stated  that  they  had  intervened  concerning  these  three  dismissals. 

"Q.  I  don't  know  about  that,  but  I  think  I  am  pretty  clear  on  the 
record.  Of  course,  the  transcript  will  speak  for  itself  on  that  regard. 

"A.  I  would  like  to  mention  in  this  very  connection,  and  whether  it 
was  in  the  testimony  here  or  in  a  statement  to  the  papers — they  may 
have  just  made  a  statement  to  the  papers  in  that  regard. 

"Q.  Of  course,  we  don't  know  about  that. 

"A.  It  did  appear.  On  that  basis  I  have  taken  under  advisement 
with  my  counsel  the  possibility  of  a  suit  against  these  individuals  be- 
cause I  had  a  contractual  relationship  with  the  Cedars  of  Lebanon 
Hospital,  and  under  the  laws  of  California  I  believe  it  is  contrary  to 
the  law  for  a  third  party  to  intervene  between  parties  to  a  contract 
which  results  in  the  breaking  of  a  contract.  At  the  time  of  my  expul- 
sion from  the  Cedars  of  Lebanon  Hospital  I  was  engaged  in  work  which 
had  been  in  progress  for  several  years  which  was  of  considerable  sig- 
nificance in  my  field.  It  had  potential  importance  concerning  the  cause 
of  a  disease  which  is  very  important  to  the  people  of  this  Country,  to 
the  health  of  the  people  of  this  Country.  The  disease  is  nephritis  which, 
when  it  is  related  to  the  disease  of  nephrosis,  accounts  for  about  17,000 
deaths  a  year,  according  to  the  United  States  Public  Health  Service 
statistics.  We  did  a  good  deal  of  work  concerning  the  cause  of  this 
disease  and  its  treatment.  We  felt  that  we  were  on  the  verge  of  much 
more  important  discoveries.  At  that  time  I  had  working  under  me  about 
six  or  seven  people  in  my  research  project.  I  am  sure  you  realize  in  a 
subject  as  complicated  as  nephritis,  Bright 's  disease  I  think  is  a  more 
common  name  and  one  you  might  recognize  better,  or  kidney  disease — 
that  it  takes  a  great  deal  of  time  to  train  people  to  work.  We  had  a 
team  which  was  able  to  work  very  efficiently  and  achieve  results  which 
we  could  achieve  much  more  quickly  than  at  the  beginning  of  our  years 
of  labor.  At  the  time  of  the  expulsion  I  had  about  a  thousand  animals, 
rats,  which  were  part  of  a  series  of  experiments  in  this  field.  These 
animals  and  the  work  it  represented  involved  a  large  investment  of 
government  funds  since  the  greater  portion  of  my  funds  came  from 
the  United  States  Public  Health  Service.  I  had  funds  of  other  founda- 
tions and  sources  as  well,  but  the  greater  proportion  represented  an  in- 
vestment of  government  funds  in  this  research. 

' '  Actually,  I  had  48  hours '  notice  in  which  to  terminate,  in  which  my 
funds  were  cut  off,  to  terminate  this  project.  I  was  faced  not  only  with 
the  personal  problems  and  personal  situation  involved,  but  with  the 
problems  of  the  people  working  for  me  and  the  loss  of  this  great  invest- 


UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  225 

ment  of  government  funds  and  of  labor  on  work  which  had  a  bearing 
upon  the  health  of  the  people,  which  I  think  was  of  significance. 

"This  expulsion  also  happened  so  rapidly  that  I  was  unable  to  make 
arrangements  to  take  care  of  my  clinic  patients.  I  was  the  founder  of 
the  kidney  disease  clinic  at  Cedars  of  Lebanon  Hospital,  which  was  the 
first  clinic  of  this  sort  in  Southern  California  and  in  the  Southwest,  as  a 
matter  of  fact.  In  a  short  time  it  had  achieved  the  reputation  as  a  center 
for  people  with  kidney  disease  and  high  blood  pressure.  I  was  given 
no  warning.  I  think  I  received  the  notification  Friday  evening,  but 
was  unable  to  contact  anybody  over  the  week  end.  I  think  my  first  clinic 
was  Monday  afternoon,  I  am  not  certain  on  the  exact  time  sequence, 
but  it  was  in  that  order  of  magnitude.  I  was  not  permitted  to  enter  the 
building  where  my  clinic  was  held.  No  one  could  inform  the  patients 
of  what  happened  to  me.  They  lined  up  in  the  hall  to  see  me.  Someone 
told  them  finally  they  could  find  me  in  the  Research  Institute.  The 
director  of  the  Institute  for  Medical  Research  declined  to  discharge  me. 
I  had  a  dual  capacity  at  the  hospital.  I  was  in  charge  of  the  kidney 
disease  clinic,  which  was  as  a  member  of  the  hospital  staff,  and  I  was 
Research  Associate  of  the  Institute  for  Medical  Research  in  a  separate 
building,  a  separate  responsibility.  While  I  was  discharged  from  my 
position  in  the  hospital,  the  director  of  the  institute,  Dr.  Harry 
Goldblatt,  declined  to  discharge  me  because  he  felt  no  adequate  grounds 
existed,  and  my  work  was  more  than  satisfactory  as  far  as  he  was 
concerned. 

' '  The  patients  were  told  they  could  find  me  in  the  Research  Institute. 
I  remember  on  that  morning  they  came  over  to  the  institute  to  see  what 
had  happened.  Some  of  them  were  very  upset  and  weeping.  Some  of  the 
children  were  sitting  on  the  floor  in  the  hall  of  the  institute.  I  was  try- 
ing to  make  some  arrangements  to  take  care  of  the  patients  so  that  they 
would  not  have  to  go  home  without  treatment  and  without  the  consid- 
eration that  they  needed. 

"The  effect  of  this  action  I  think  was  detrimental  to  the  health  of 
the  people  of  this  community.  It  was  detrimental  to  health  on  at  least 
a  two-fold  basis :  one,  in  the  sense  that  my  work  was  disrupted.  For  the 
past  two  years,  since  this  abrupt  termination  of  my  research,  it  has 
been  impossible  for  me  to  resume  my  research.  The  potential  progress 
in  the  control  of  an  important  disease  has  been  arrested  as  a  result. 
I  make  no  claim,  I  want  to  make  it  plain  I  do  not  make  any  claim  that 
I  would  have  discovered  anything  great  in  this  period  of  time,  but  I 
think  my  performance  in  the  past  shows  that  I  was  capable  of  making 
progress  in  this  field  and  that  the  progress,  at  least  that  much  which 
I  had  already  shown  the  capability  to  do,  has  been  arrested,  and  the 
patients  for  whom  I  had  some  degree  of  skill  to  apply  have  not  been 
able  to  get  that  skill  applied  to  their  cases. 


226  UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

"As  a  further  evidence  in  this  regard  I  might  mention  that  many- 
times  I  have  been  asked  to  consult  concerning  patients  in  the  Cedars 
of  Lebanon  Hospital.  In  spite  of  the  fact  that  I  had  been  expelled  from 
the  staff,  doctors  whose  patients  were  critically  ill  with  kidney  disease, 
because  of  my  reputation  in  the  field,  have  asked  me  to  come  and  see 
patients  so  that  I  might  help  advise  them  how  to  deal  with  these  serious 
situations,  many  of  which  resulted  in  deaths  to  the  patients  subse- 
quently. 

"The  hospital  refused  to  admit  me  to  the  building.  I  heard  that  one 
high  individual  in  the  hospital  circles  said  I  would  not  even  be  per- 
mitted in  as  a  visitor.  I  was  prevented  from  doing  anything  to  help 
these  patients.  Again  I  don't  say  that  I  would  have  done  the  impossible 
or  saved  any  lives,  but  I  say  that  it  is  not  a  very  manly  thing  to  deprive 
a  patient  of  even  the  possibility  that  someone  might  be  able  to  help 
them  when  they  are  facing  death  from  a  disease. 

"You  might  also  be  interested  to  know  that  for  the  first  time  since 
my  dismissal,  a  couple  of  weeks  ago  I  was  permitted  to  go  back  in  con- 
sultation at  the  Cedars  of  Lebanon  Hospital,  to  see  a  patient  who  was 
very  critically  ill.  I  am  happy  to  be  able  to  report  he  became  better  and 
went  home.  Incidentally,  this  has  happened  since  the  replacement  of 
Mr.  Meyer  as  president.  There  is  a  new  president  at  the  Cedars  of 
Lebanon  Hospital. 

"Q.  Who  is  he? 

"A.  George  Thompson. 

"Q.  Would  you  expedite  your  recital  in  this  regard,  please,  because 
we  have  many  other  witnesses. 

"A.  I  think  this  about  completes  what  I  would  like  to  say,  except 
for  one  last  statement.  I  want  to  make  it  clear  that  I  do  not  feel  the 
Cedars  of  Lebanon  Hospital  is  responsible  for  the  position  that  they 
were  forced  to  assume.  I  am  not  a  revengeful  person.  I  think  that  they 
were  forced  into  this  position  by  what  I  now  learn  to  be  the  interven- 
tion of  the  medical  society  leadership  with  a  great  deal  of  power  to 
enforce  their  desires  upon  hospitals.  Hospitals  depend  for  recognition 
on  agencies  which  are  closely  connected  with  the  medical  association, 
consequently,  disapproval  by  the  medical  association  of  their  policies 
can  ruin  a  hospital  and  it  can  ruin  a  doctor.  I  feel  that  the  trustees  of 
the  Cedars  of  Lebanon  Hospital  perhaps  can  be  characterized  as  men 
who  were  not  very  courageous  but  who  were  forced  into  this  position 
by  the  policies  of  the  medical  association. 

"Q.  Does  that  conclude  your  statement,  Doctor? 

"A.  Yes,  sir. 

"Mr.  Combs:  Mr.  Marshall,  in  view  of  the  fact  that  we  have  been 
requested — you  have  one  other  client  to  testify  before  noon 

"Mr.  Marshall:  Yes. 


UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  227 

"Mr.  Combs:  Mr.  Margolis  has  requested  that  we  accommodate  him 
by  putting  his  client  on  before  we  adjourn.  In  view  of  that  situation 
and  in  view  of  the  fact  that  we  have  quite  a  number  of  witnesses  this 
afternoon  and  tomorrow,  couldn  't  we  enter  into  an  agreement  now  that 
after  the  response  to  the  first  question  which  the  witness  may  or  may 
not  choose  to  answer,  that  we  have  the  same  stipulation  that  we  have 
had  heretofore? 

"Mr.  Marshall:  Yes.  I  will  make  such  a  stipulation,  with  the  excep- 
tion of  the  stipulation  regarding  the  order  of  the  chairman  of  the  com- 
mittee to  answer  each  specific  question. 

"Mr.  Combs:  Yes. 

"Mr.  Marshall:  If  there  will  be  a  lot  of  questions? 

"Mr.  Combs :  No,  there  will  be  very,  very  few. 

"Mr.  Marshall:  We  can  probably  handle  it  that  way,  but  before  we 
get  into  that  I  would  like  to  make  an  inquiry  for  the  record  when 
Senator  Burns  returns  to  his  chair. 

' '  Mr.  Combs :  Very  well. 

"Q.  Doctor,  are  you  acquainted  with 

"Mr.  Marshall:  Before  you  ask  the  question  would  you  be  kind 
enough  to  ask  Senator  Burns  to  return  to  his  chair  so  that  I  might  ask 
a  question  ? 

"Mr.  Combs:  I  cannot  make  him  return  to  his  chair  until  he  is 
through. 

"Mr.  Marshall:  No.  I  didn't  mean  make  him,  but  ask  him  to  come. 
Thank  you  very  much,  Senator.  On  TV  Channel  4  last  night  I  saw 
and  heard  an  interview  by  a  person  who  bore  a  reasonable  facsimile  to 
the  appearance  and  voice  of  Senator  Burns.  In  that  interview  the  per- 
son purporting  to  be  Senator  Burns  said,  among  other  things,  as  fol- 
lows :  that  this  committee  was  not  here  to  get  information,  that  it  had 
all  the  information  it  wanted.  Now,  was  that  you,  Senator  Burns,  who 
made  that  statement? 

"Senator  Burns:  I  never  made  any  such  statement. 

' '  Mr.  Marshall :  Would  you  tell  us  for  the  record  what  you  did  say 
in  this  television  interview  last  night? 

"Chairman  Burns:  I  would  object  to  that  very  much.  I  am  not  a 
witness  before  the  committee  and  you  are  not  the  interrogator. 

"Mr.  Marshall:  For  the  sake  of  the  record,  so  that  we  have  a  com- 
plete record  of  what  the  purposes  of  the  committee  are,  it  would  seem 
to  me  that  the  chairman  of  the  committee  ought  to  be  willing  to  state 
those  purposes  on  the  record  right  now. 

' '  Chairman  Burns :  The  purposes  of  the  committee  are  set  forth  in 
the  resolution  creating  it,  of  which  you  have  a  copy,  Mr.  Marshall. 

"Mr.  Combs:  And  which  you  have  cited  many  times,  Counsel. 


228  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES   IN   CALIFORNIA 

' '  Mr.  Marshall :  But  the  Senator  gave  the  particular  meaning  and 
application  to  that  resolution  with  reference  to  these  particular  hear- 
ings. 

' '  Mr.  Combs :  Mr.  Marshall,  we  are  here  to  interrogate  witnesses. 
You  are  not  here  to  interrogate  members  of  the  committee. 

''Mr.  Marshall:  I  wouldn't  want  to  crowd  the  chairman  for  an  an- 
swer. He  should  have  an  opportunity  to  consult  counsel,  too. 

"Mr.  Combs:  You  wouldn't  cite  him  for  contempt? 

"Mr.  Marshall:  No,  I  won't  cite  him  for  contempt  either. 

"Mr.  Combs:  I  don't  think  you  will. 

' '  Chairman  Burns :  No. 

"Mr.  Combs:  All  right. 

' '  Mr.  Marshall :  You  don 't  choose  to  make  the  statement,  is  that 
correct  ? 

"Mr.  Combs:  Maybe  he  will  invoke  the  Fifth  Amendment. 

"Chairman  Burns:  I  will  make  my  statement  at  the  proper  time, 
and  this  is  not  the  proper  time,  Mr.  Marshall. 

"Q.  (By  Mr.  Combs)  :  Dr.  Lippman,  are  you  acquainted  with  Dr. 
Thomas  L.  Perry? 

"A.  Are  you  ready  for  my  answer? 

"Q.  Yes.  The  question  was,  are  you  acquainted  with  Dr.  Thomas  L. 
Perry?  To  further  identify  Dr.  Thomas  L.  Perry,  he  was  the  witness 
I  think  who  was  first  on  the  stand  yesterday  morning.  He  was  a  client 
of  yours,  wasn't  he,  Mr.  Marshall? 

"Mr.  Marshall:  Yes,  sir. 

' '  The  Witness :  Senator  Burns,  we  are  in  peculiar  times,  times  when 
any  red  blooded  American  would  not  answer  the  question  as  to  the 
color  of  his  blood  because  it  might  imply  that  he  was  a  subversive 
individual. 

"Q.   (By  Mr.  Combs)  :  He  might  have  to  say  it  was  red? 

"A.  That  is  right.  I  feel  this  business  of  coming  before  committees 
for  questions  concerning  their  political  opinions  constitutes  a  trial  by 
ordeal  and  by  newspaper  rather  than  by  the  American  way  of  trying  a 
person  in  a  court  of  law.  This  committee  reminds  me,  if  you  will  for- 
give the  simile,  of  the  character  of  Poo  Bah  in  The  Mikado  by  Gilbert 
and  Sullivan,  because  it  combines  in  itself  the  functions  of  prosecutor, 
judge,  jury  and  jailor,  all  in  one,  because  punishment,  unofficial  punish- 
ment but  nevertheless  punishment,  results  from  the  actions  of  a  witness 
before  this  committee. 

"Dr.  Perry  has  appeared  before  this  committee  as  well  as  before  the 
House  Committee  in  Un-American  Activities,  as  what  is  called  an 
unfriendly  witness.  For  this  reason,  even  if  I  wanted  to  answer  this 
question,  as  a  matter  of  principle,  I  must  decline  to  answer  this  ques- 
tion on  the  grounds  and  the  reasons  that  follow : 


UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  229 

"First,  I  consider  it  an  invasion  of  my  right  to  speak  or  to  remain 
silent.  I  consider  it  an  invasion  of  my  right  to  associate  with  people 
or  organizations  as  I  please,  as  guaranteed  by  the  First  Amendment 
to  the  Bill  of  Rights  of  the  United  States  Constitution,  and  Article  I, 
Section  9,  of  the  Constitution  of  this  State,  the  privileges  of  which  I 
now  claim. 

"Secondly,  it  is  an  attempt  to  expose  me  to  the  danger  of  a  ground- 
less and  false  prosecution  for  an  alleged  violation  of  a  federal  or  state 
law.  Consequently,  I  avail  myself  of  that  constitutional  right  which  was 
intended  for  the  protection  of  the  innocent  and  from  whose  use  no 
inference  of  guilt  can  be  drawn. 

"I  now  claim  the  privilege  contained  in  the  Fifth  Amendment  of  the 
Bill  of  Rights  of  the  United  States  Constitution  which  provides  that 
you  cannot  compel  me  to  be  a  witness  against  myself,  and  Article  I, 
Section  13,  of  the  Constitution  of  this  State. 

"It  is  an  attempt  to  deprive  me  of  my  right  to  earn  my  livelihood, 
my  liberty  and  property  without  due  process  of  law,  and  to  deny  me 
equal  protection  of  the  law,  which  is  contrary  to  the  Fourteenth 
Amendment  of  the  Bill  of  Rights  of  the  United  States  Constitution, 
and  Article  I,  Section  13,  of  the  California  State  Constitution.  I  claim 
the  privileges  under  those  provisions. 

"I  feel  that  this  question  has  no  materiality  nor  pertinency  to  any 
lawful  power  of  this  committee. 

"My  final  ground  is  that  this  committee  sits,  in  my  opinion,  with- 
out lawful  authority,  and  exceeds  its  valid  powers. 

"Mr.  Combs:  May  it  be  stipulated,  counsel,  that  in  connection  with 
each  additional  question  that  may  henceforth  be  put  to  your  client 
and  which  he  elects  to  refuse  to  answer,  that  his  reasons  for  refusing 
will  be  deemed  to  be  those  which  he  has  just  given? 

"Mr.  Marshall:  So  stipulated. 

"Mr.  Combs:  And  will  it  also  be  stipulated  in  each  instance  that 
the  chairman  of  the  committe  will  be  deemed  to  have  delcared  the  rea- 
sons insufficient  and  has  directed  the  witness  to  answer? 

"Mr.  Marshall:  In  that  respect  I  won't  be  able  to  so  stipulate.  I 
would  prefer  in  each  case  that  the  chairman  so  advise  the  witness. 

' '  Mr.  Combs  :  Very  well.  So  stipulated. 

"Q.  Is  it  not  a  fact  that  you  and  Dr.  Thomas  L.  Perry,  who  was 
the  first  witness  here  yesterday  morning,  are  brothers-in-law? 

"A.  Same  question,  same  answer. 

"Chairman  Burns:  The  witness  is  instructed  to  answer. 

"A.  Same  question,  same  answer. 

"Chairman  Burns:  On  the  grounds  of  self-incrimination  are  not 
applicable  to  this  question.  You  are  directed  to  answer  the  question. 

"Q.   (By  Mr.  Combs)  :  Have  you  ever  been  a  member  of  the  


230  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

"Mr.  Marshall:  Wait  a  minute,  Mr.  Combs.  Will  the  record  show 
in  response  to  the  last  direction  by  the  chairman  that  the  witness  has 
declined  to  answer  upon  all  of  the  stipulated  grounds  ? 

"Mr.  Combs:  Yes.  Have  you  ever  been  a  member  of  the  Communist 
Party  or  the  Communist  Political  Association? 

"A.  Same  question,  same  answer. 

"Mr.  Combs:  It  is  not  the  same  question.  It  is  the  same  answer.  Do 
you  mean  to  say  same  answer? 

"Mr.  Marshall:  The  witness  wants  to  address  himself  in  reply  to 
the  last  question. 

' '  Mr.  Combs :  Your  stipulation  is  in  effect  now. 

"Mr.  Marshall:  Yes,  but  he  wants  to  supplement  that  answer.  The 
stipulation  does  not  confine  us  to  those  reasons  only. 

"The  Witness:  Very  briefly. 

"Mr.  Combs:  All  right. 

' '  The  Witness :  These  questions  are  shutting  off  the  flow  of  informa- 
tion. If  you  have  any  questions  you  would  like  to  ask  concerning  the 
county  medical  association  and  other  aspects  in  which  you  may  be 
interested,  you  might  withdraw  these  questions  and  permit  me  to 
answer  some  others. 

' '  Mr.  Marshall :  In  other  words,  Senator  Burns,  if  you  really  want 
some  information  about  the  L.  A.  County  Medical  Society  situation, 
I  suggest  that  you  interrogate  the  witness  on  that  subject  and  then 
proceed  later  with  these  other  questions. 

"Mr.  Combs:  I  respectfully  decline  your  suggestion.  I  prefer  to  ask 
the  questions  we  are  interested  in. 

' '  Q.  Will  you  answer  the  question,  Doctor. 

"A.  Same  question,  same  answer. 

"Q.  The  same  reasons? 

"A.  The  same  reasons,  the  stipulated  reasons. 

"Q.  Have  you  ever  been  connected  with  the  Community  Medical 
Center? 

"A.  Same  question,  same  answer,  same  grounds,  same  stipulation. 

"Q.  It  is  not  the  same  question.  Your  answer  is  the  same  for  the 
reasons  already  given,  covered  by  the  stipulation? 

"A.  I  beg  your  pardon,  that  is  right. 

"Q.  That  is  perfectly  all  right. 

"A.  I  got  confused  there. 

"Q.  Have  you  ever  been  affiliated  with  the  Medical  Division  of  the 
Arts,  Sciences  and  Professions  Council  in  Los  Angeles? 

"A.  Same  answer,  same  grounds,  same  stipulation. 

' '  Q.  Dr.  Lippman,  did  you  ever  reside  at  444  North  Bundy  Street  ? 

"A.  Same  answer,  same  grounds,  same  stipulation. 

"Q.  Did  you  ever  reside  at  4602  Anna  Street  in  San  Francisco? 


UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  231 

"A.  Would  3'ou  repeat  that  address,  please? 

"Q.  Yes,  4602  Anna,  A-n-n-a,  Street,  San  Francisco. 

"A.  Same  answer,  same  grounds,  same  stipulation. 

' '  Q.  Is  it  not  a  fact  that  you  resided  on  Anna  Street  in  San  Francisco  in 
October  of  1946,  and  while  living  there  received  as  a  subscriber  the  paper 
known  as  the  Daily  People's  World? 

"A.  Same  answer,  same  grounds,  same  stipulation. 

"Q.  Is  it  not  true  that  your  subscription  to  that  paper  continued 
thereafter  and  up  until  the  present  time? 

"A.  Same  answer,  same  grounds,  same  stipulation. 

"Q.  Have  you  ever  been  affiliated  with  the  Civil  Rights  Congress? 

"A.  Same  answer,  same  grounds,  same  stipulation. 

"Mr.  Combs:  Mr.  Marshall,  I  will  ask  your  client  about  a  series  of 
meetings  similar  to  those  I  have  asked  your  other  clients,  with  the 
names  and  dates,  and  then  I  will  be  through. 

"Q.  Is  it  not  a  fact  that  on  the  second  day  of  December,  1950,  you 
Avere  a  speaker  at  the  Arts,  Sciences,  and  Professions  membership 
convention  in  Los  Angeles  and  gave  a  report  for  its  Medical  Division? 

"A.  Same  answer,  same  grounds,  same  stipulation. 

"Q.  Is  it  not  a  fact  that  you  attended  the  following  meetings,  and 
I  will  read  them  all  and  you  can  answer  the  question : 

"A  membership  meeting  of  the  Arts,  Sciences  and  Professions  Coun- 
cil— these  are  all  in  Los  Angeles — April  12,  1951 ; 

"A  meeting  of  the  Executive  Board  of  the  Arts,  Sciences  and  Pro- 
fessions Council,  Medical  Division,  on  June  22,  1951 ; 

"The  Arts,  Sciences  and  Professions  Council  Peace  Committee,  7410 
Sunset  Boulevard,  Los  Angeles,  June  27,   1951 ; 

"Arts,  Sciences  and  Professions  Peace  Committee,  of  which  you 
were  chairman,  7410  Sunset  Boulevard,  July  3,  1951 ; 

"A  meeting  of  the  same  committee,  Arts,  Sciences  and  Professions 
Peace  Committee,  7410  Sunset  Boulevard,  July  17,  1951 ; 

"Arts,  Sciences  and  Professions  Peace  Comittee,  of  which  you  acted 
as  chairman,  7410  Sunset  Boulevard,  July  31,  1951 ; 

"Arts,  Sciences  and  Professions  Peace  Committee,  of  which  you 
acted  as  chairman,  7410  Sunset  Boulevard,  August  9,  1951; 

"Arts,  Sciences  and  Professions  Council,  Medical  Division,  9620 
Monte  Mar  Drive,  August  12,  1951 ; 

"Medical  Division  of  the  Arts,  Sciences  and  Professions  Council, 
406  South  Holt  Street,  Los  Angeles,  August  23,  1951  ?  That  is  all. 

"A.  Same  answer,  same  grounds,  same  stipulation. 

"Mr.  Combs:  That  is  all. 

' '  Chairman  Burns :  Mr.  Marshall  ? 

"Mr.  Marshall:  Yes,  Senator. 


232  UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

"Chairman  Burns:  The  grounds  so  stated  by  the  witness  for  re- 
fusing to  answer  the  questions  regarding  these  meetings  are  ruled 
insufficient  by  the  chairman.  The  chairman  instructs  the  witness  to 
answer  the  questions  again. 

"The  Witness:  Same  answers,  same  grounds,  same  stipulation. 

' '  Chairman  Burns :  Very  well. 

' '  Mr.  Marshall :  Senator  Burns,  since  the  announced  purpose  of  this 
hearing  of  this  committe  deals  with  a  certain  election  of  the  Los 
Angeles  County  Medical  Society,  this  witness  has  some  information  on 
that  subject  which  he  would  like  to  give  to  the  committee.  May  he  be 
heard  now? 

"The  Witness:  Briefly. 

"Chairman  Burns:  The  witness  set  the  policy  of  refusing  to  give 
the  committee  the  information  that  it  wants.  He  did  that  himself. 
Getting  back  to  the  statement  made  by  the  chairman  to  the  press  yes- 
terday, the  statement  was  made  that  it  was  no  surprise  to  the  chair- 
man that  these  witnesses  who  appeared  yesterday  and  thus  far  today 
have  given  the  committee  practically  no  information. 

"Mr.  Marshall:  You  do  have  information. 

"Chairman  Burns:  And  we  did  not  rely  on  them  for  information; 
we  had  other  sources  of  information.  That  was  the  statement  I  made. 
It  is  borne  out  thus  far.  With  one  witness  we  got  off  to  a  pretty  good 
start,  but  the  minute  the  party  discipline  enters  into  the  picture  the 
witness  is  stricken  dumb  and  refuses  to  answer  the  questions  or  give 
any  further  information.  The  committee  will  conduct  the  hearing  in 
its  own  way,  Mr.  Marshall.  If  the  witness  does  not  want  to  cooperate 
and  explain  further  all  of  the  ramifications  involved  in  this — he  is 
not  going  to  be  permitted  to  edit  his  testimony.  He  may  not  expand 
further  on  this  question,  and  he  is  excused. 

"Mr.  Marshall:  You  say  you  want  information.  The  witness  has 
information  about  the  L.  A.  County  Medical  Society. 

"Chairman  Burns:  We  will  get  the  information  our  own  way,  Mr. 
Marshall.  We  are  not  going  to  have  it  edited  by  this  witness,  or  any- 
body else,  or  by  counsel. 

' '  Mr.  Marshall :  If  you  don 't  want  the  information,  why  don 't  you 
quash  all  the  other  subpenas?  What  is  the  point  of  taking  up  every- 
body's time  when  you  have  all  the  information  you  want? 

"Chairman  Burns:  May  I  remind  you,  Mr.  Marshall,  that  counsel 
for  witnesses  before  legislative  committees  are  before  them  as  a  courtesy. 
You  are  here  as  a  courtesy.  You  are  not  permitted  nor  granted  the 
light  to  be  present  except  by  committee  permission.  We  have  leaned 
over  backwards,  so  to  speak,  to  give  you  all  of  the  courtesy  possible, 
which  we  extended  to  you  as  a  member  of  the  bar.  You  are  here  to 


UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  233 

advise  your  client,  not  to  advise  us.  We  have  our  own  counsel  for  that 
purpose. 

"Mr.  Marshall:  Senator,  I  should  like  or  I  would  like  to  say  that  I 
disagree  that  a  person  only  has  a  right  to  counsel  as  a  matter  of  grace 
on  the  part  of  the  committee.  It  is  my  view  that  a  witness  has  a  con- 
stitutional right  to  have  counsel  before  committee  hearings. 

"Mr.  Combs:  May  the  witness  be  excused? 

"Chairman  Burns:  He  is  excused.  Do  you  have  another  client,  Mr. 
Marshall  ? 

"Mr.  Marshall:  Yes. 

TESTIMONY  OF  DR.  SAUL  MATLIN,  OSTEOPATHIC 
PHYSICIAN  AND  SURGEON 

"Chairman  Burns:  State  your  name  and  address,  please,  for  the 
record. 

"A.  Saul  Matlin,  525  South  Victory  Boulevard,  Burbank,  California. 
Home  address,  7703  Shady  Spring  Drive,  Burbank. 

"Q.  (By  Mr.  Combs)  :  Dr.  Matlin,  you  are  a  duly  licensed  physician 
and  surgeon? 

"A.  Yes,  I  am. 

"Q.  And  medical  doctor? 

"A.  I  am  an  osteopathic  physician  and  surgeon. 

"Q.  About  how  long  have  you  held  your  license  to  practice  that 
profession  in  California? 

"A.  I  held  that  license  in  California  since  about  1947. 

"Q.  "Where  did  you  get  your  training? 

"A.I  attended  public  schools  in  New  York.  I  graduated  from  Brook- 
lyn College  before  I  received  my  professional  training  in  Chicago.  I 
graduated  from  the  Chicago  College  of  Osteopathy.  Then  I  returned  to 
New  York  for  my  interneship  at  the  Manhattan  General  Hospital. 

"Q.  What  year  did  you  come  to  California? 

"A.  1947. 

"Q.  And  you  have  practiced  here  ever  since? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  In  1948  and  thereafter  were  you  familiar  with  an  organization 
in  Los  Angeles  known  as  the  California  Labor  School1! 

"A.  Mr.  Combs,  I  decline  to  answer  this  question  upon  the  grounds 
and  for  the  reasons  as  follows: 

"I  believe  that  this  in  an  invasion  of  my  right  to  speak  or  to  remain 
silent,  to  associate  or  not  to  associate  with  persons  and  organizations. 

"It  is  an  invasion  of  my  rights  as  guaranteed  by  the  First  Amend- 
ment to  the  Bill  of  Rights,  and  Article  I,  Section  9,  of  the  Constitution 
of  this  State,  whose  privileges  I  now  claim. 


234  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN  CALIFORNIA 

"It  is  an  attempt  to  expose  me  to  the  dangers  of  a  groundless  and 
false  prosecution  for  an  alleged  violation  of  federal  or  state  law.  Conse- 
quently I  avail  myself  of  the  constitutional  right  which  was  intended 
for  the  protection  of  the  innocent  and  from  whose  use  no  inference  of 
guilt  can  be  drawn. 

' '  I  now  claim  the  privilege  contained  in  the  Fifth  Amendment  to  the 
Bill  of  Rights,  which  provides  that  you  cannot  compel  me  to  be  a 
witness  against  myself,  and  Article  I,  Section  13,  of  the  Constitution 
of  this  State.  It  is  an  attempt  to  deprive  me  of  my  right  to  earn  a 
livelihood,  my  liberty  and  property  without  due  process  of  law,  and 
to  deny  me  the  equal  protection  of  the  laws,  contrary  to  the  Fourth 
Amendment  of  the  Bill  of  Rights  of  the  United  States  Constitution, 
and  Article  I,  Section  13,  of  the  Constitution  of  this  State. 

' '  This  committee,  I  believe,  sits  without  lawful  authority  and  exceeds 
its  valid  powers. 

' l  Lastly,  this  question  has  no  materiality  or  pertinency  to  any  lawful 
power  of  this  committee. 

' '  Mr.  Combs :  Mr.  Marshall,  may  we  have  the  same  stipulation  ? 

' '  Mr.  Marshall :  Same  stipulation  with  respect  to  declinations  of  the 
witness  to  answer.  We  will  stipulate  that  in  each  case  where  he  declines 
to  answer  that  he  will  be  deemed  to  have  incorporated  as  his  grounds  of 
declination  each  and  every  ground  which  he  has  just  stated. 

"Mr.  Combs:  Will  it  also  be  stipulated  that  the  chairman  will  be 
deemed  to  have  ruled  that  the  grounds  are  insufficient  and  has  in- 
structed the  witness  to  answer? 

"Mr.  Marshall:  No,  sir. 

"Mr.  Combs:  The  first  part  of  the  stipulation  is  agreed  to? 

"Mr.  Marshall:  That  is  right. 

"Q.  (By  Mr.  Combs)  :  Mr.  Matlin,  have  you  ever  been  a  member  of 
the  Civil  Rights  Congress? 

' '  Mr.  Marshall :  For  the  sake  of  the  record,  it  is  Dr.  Matlin. 

"Mr.  Combs:  Excuse  me. 

"Q.  Doctor  Matlin,  have  you  ever  been  a  member  of  the  Civil  Bights 
Congress? 

"A.  Same  grounds,  same  stipulation. 

' '  Chairman  Burns :  The  reasons  are  not  sufficient.  You  are  instructed 
to  answer  the  question. 

"The  Witness:  Same  answer,  same  grounds,  same  stipulation. 

"Mr.  Combs:  I  don't  think  the  record  is  clear  on  the  last  part.  I 
don't  think  his  refusal  to  answer  is  in  the  record.  Would  you  read  the 
record  back?  (Record  read).  He  said  the  same  grounds  and  same 
stipulation,  but  he  did  not  say  he  refused  to  answer  the  question. 


UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  235 

' '  The  "Witness :  I  decline  to  answer  the  question  for  the  same  reasons, 
grounds  and  stipulations. 

"Q-  (By  Mr.  Combs)  :  Is  it  not  a  fact  that  you  have  been  connected 
with  the  Community  Medical  Center  in  Los  Angeles  ? 

"A.  I  refuse  to  answer  for  the  same  grounds,  same  reasons,  same 
stipulation. 

"Chairman  Burns:  The  grounds  are  insufficient.  The  witness  is 
instructed  to  answer  the  question. 

' '  The  "Witness :  I  refuse  again  for  the  same  grounds,  reasons  and 
stipulations. 

"Q.  (By  Mr.  Combs)  :  Are  you  acquainted  with  Dr.  Schoen? 

"A.  I  again  refuse  for  the  same  reasons,  same  grounds,  same  stipu- 
lation. 

' '  Chairman  Burns :  You  refuse  to  answer  the  question  ? 

"The  Witness:  I  refuse  to  answer  for  those  reasons. 

' '  Chairman  Burns :  The  grounds  are  deemed  insufficient.  The  witness 
is  instructed  to  answer  the  question. 

"The  Witness:  I  refuse  to  answer  on  the  same  grounds,  the  same 
reasons,  same  stipulation. 

"Q.  (By  Mr.  Combs)  :  Is  it  not  a  fact  you  are  affiliated  with  an 
organization  in  Los  Angeles  known  as  the  Arts,  Sciences  and  Profes- 
sions Council  f 

"A.  I  refuse  to  answer  for  the  same  reasons,  same  grounds,  same 
stipulation. 

' '  Chairman  Burns :  Your  reasons  are  insufficient.  You  are  instructed 
to  answer  the  question. 

' '  The  Witness :  I  refuse  to  answer  for  the  same  reasons,  same  grounds 
and  same  stipulation. 

"Mr.  Combs:  This  may  not  be  covered  by  the  stipulation,  Mr. 
Marshall. 

"Q.  Do  you  own  a  Dodge  sedan  automobile,  Doctor  Matlin? 

"A.  I  refuse  to  answer  for  the  same  grounds,  reason  and  stipulation. 

"Q.  Are  you  acquainted  with  Dr.  Marvin  Sure? 

"A.  I  refuse  to  answer  for  the  same  reasons,  grounds  and  stipulation. 

"Q.  Are  you  acquainted  with  or  have  you  been  a  member  of  the  Com- 
munist Party  or  Communist  Political  Association? 

"A.  I  refuse  to  answer  for  the  same  reasons,  grounds  and  stipulation. 

"Mr.  Combs:  Mr.  Marshall,  I  now  have  a  series  of  questions  about 
meetings.  If  you  agree,  we  may  follow  the  suggestion  which  you  made  in 
connection  with  the  testimony  of  your  preceding  client. 

"Mr.  Marshall:  It  is  satisfactory. 

"Q.  (By  Mr.  Combs)  :  Is  it  not  a  fact,  Dr.  Matlin,  that  you  attended 
the  following  meetings : 


236  UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

"A  meeting  of  the  Arts,  Sciences  and  Professions  Council,  Medical 
Division  at  109  North  Highland  Avenue,  Los  Angeles,  on  the  7th  day  of 
September,  1951 ; 

"A  meeting  of  the  Arts,  Sciences  and  Professions  Council,  Medical 
Division,  Executive  Board,  at  921  South  Sierra  Bonita  Street  in  Los 
Angeles  on  the  19th  day  of  October,  1951 ; 

"A  meeting  of  the  Arts,  Sciences  and  Professions  Council,  Medical 
Division,  109  North  Highland  Avenue,  on  the  20th  day  of  January, 
1952; 

"A  meeting  of  the  Arts,  Sciences  and  Professions  Council,  Medical 
Division,  Executive  Board,  at  535|  North  Spaulding  Street,  on  the  1st 
day  of  February,  1952 ; 

"A  meeting  of  the  Committee  for  Medical  Freedom  regarding  the 
discharge  of  three  doctors  from  Cedars  of  Lebanon  Hospital  on  the  25th 
day  of  February,  1952 ; 

"A  meeting  of  the  Medical  Division,  Executive  Board,  of  the  Arts, 
Sciences  and  Professions  Council  at  535|  North  Spaulding  Street,  Los 
Angeles,  on  the  3d  day  of  March,  1952 ; 

"A  meeting  of  the  Arts,  Sciences  and  Professions  Council,  Medical 
Division,  7410  Sunset  Boulevard,  Los  Angeles,  on  March  14th,  1952; 

"A  meeting  of  the  Arts,  Sciences  and  Professions  Council,  Medical 
Division,  at  Stanley  Hall,  Los  Angeles,  on  the  18th  day  of  April,  1952 ; 

"A  meeting  of  the  Medical  Division,  Executive  Board,  of  the  Arts, 
Sciences  and  Professions  Council,  7410  Sunset  Boulevard,  Los  Angeles, 
on  May  2,  1952 ; 

"A  meeting  of  the  Arts,  Sciences  and  Professions  Council,  Medical 
Division,  Executive  Board  at  7349  Pacific  View  Drive,  Los  Angeles,  on 
June  2d,  1952; 

' '  A  meeting  of  the  Arts,  Sciences  and  Professions  Council  Equal  Bights 
Conference  at  the  Alexandria  Hotel,  on  the  14th  day  of  June,  1952 ; 

"A  meeting  of  the  Medical  Division  of  the  Arts,  Sciences  and  Profes- 
sions Council  at  7410  Sunset  Boulevard,  Los  Angeles  on  August  22d, 
1952; 

"A  meeting  of  the  Medical  Division  of  the  Arts,  Sciences  and  Profes- 
sions Council  at  7410  Sunset  Boulevard,  on  October  31st,  1952; 

"A  general  membership  meeting  of  the  Arts,  Sciences  and  Profes- 
sions Council  on  January  13th,  1953,  at  which  new  officers  were  elected ; 

"A  meeting  of  the  Medical  Division  of  the  Arts,  Sciences  and  Profes- 
sions Council  at  1406  South  St.  Andrews  Place,  Los  Angeles,  on  the 
16th  day  of  January,  1953 ; 

"A  joint  meeting  of  the  Community  Medical  Center  and  the  Arts, 
Sciences  and  Professions  Council  at  1236  South  Lake  Street  in  Los 
Angeles  on  the  26th  day  of  February,  1953? 


UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES   IN    CALIFORNIA  237 

"A.  I  refuse  to  answer  these  questions  on  the  same  grounds,  for  the 
same  reasons  and  the  same  stipulations.  I  would  also  like  to  say,  Mr. 
Combs,  I  consider  all  these  questions  to  be  improper  questions  because 
of  the  theory  that  it  seems  to  rest  on  of  trying  to  establish  some  sort  of 
guilt  or  to  imply  that  something  is  wrong  because  of  the  associations 
that  you  are  seeking  to  establish. 

"Chairman  Burns:  Just  a  minute,  doctor.  The  reasons  that  you  have 
given  in  refusing  to  answer  the  questions,  which  are  deemed  by  the  com- 
mittee pertinent  to  this  inquiry,  are  ruled  and  held  insufficient.  You  are 
hereby  instructed  to  answer  these  questions  relative  to  the  attendance  at 
these  meetings. 

' '  The  AVitness :  I  decline  to  answer  on  the  same  grounds,  for  the  same 
reasons  and  stipulation. 

"Chairman  Burns:  The  witness  is  excused. 

"Mr.  Combs :  That  is  all. 

"Mr.  Marshall :  Senator  Burns,  the  witness  has  a  brief  statement  which 
he  started  to  make  as  you  interrupted.  May  he  finish  that  statement? 

' '  Chairman  Burns :  If  the  witness  requests  that  a  statement  be  in- 
cluded in  the  records  of  this  hearing  and  be  marked  as  an  exhibit,  we 
will  be  happy  to  receive  it. 

' '  Mr.  Marshall :  May  he  make  it  now  ?  He  does  not  have  one  prepared. 

' '  Chairman  Burns :  He  can  submit  it  when  it  is  prepared. 

' '  Mr.  Marshall :  It  will  take  about  five  minutes. 

"Chairman  Burns:  That  is  five  minutes  too  long,  Counsel. 

"Mr.  Marshall :  Won't  you  hear  him  now,  Senator? 

' '  Chairman  Burns :  No,  the  witness  is  excused. 

TESTIMONY  OF  DR.  P.  PRICE  COBBS,  M.D. 

' '  Mr.  Combs :  Now,  Mr.  Margolis,  you  have  a  witness  that  you  re- 
quested be  heard.  It  was  merely  a  question  of  the  order  of  appearance. 

"Mr.  Margolis:  This  is  my  associate  counsel,  James  Reese. 

' '  Chairman  Burns :  Let  the  record  show  the  presence  of  Mr.  Ben 
Margolis.  What  is  your  address? 

"Mr.  Margolis:  112  West  Ninth  Street,  Los  Angeles  15,  California. 

"Mr.  Reese:  My  name  is  James  Reese,  2502  South  Central  Avenue, 
Los  Angeles  11. 

' '  Chairman  Burns :  Dr.  Cobbs,  would  you  mind  standing  up  and 
being  sworn,  please. 

"Mr.  Combs:  Mr.  Margolis,  it  is  a  fact,  isn't  it,  for  the  sake  of  the 
record,  that  you  requested  the  committee  to  permit  your  client  to  go 
on  before  the  noon  adjournment  if  possible? 

"Mr.  Margolis:  Yes,  it  is.  What  I  wanted  to  make  clear  is  that  this 
witness  is  appearing  here  under  compulsion,  and  the  request  was  with 


238  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

respect  to  the  order  of  appearance  and  not  with  respect  to  his  appear- 
ance before  the  committee. 

"Mr.  Combs:  That  is  entirely  correct.  He  was  served  with  a  subpena. 

"Mr.  Margolis:  That  is  correct,  and  he  is  here  in  response  to  that 
subpena  and  for  no  other  reason. 

"Mr.  Combs:  I  am  sure  that  is  correct. 

"Q.  Dr.  Cobbs,  you  were  a  student  at  Howard  University,  were 
you  not? 

"A.  Yes,  I  was. 

"Q.  Did  you  graduate  from  Howard  University  in  1919? 

"A.  I  did. 

"Q.  You  are  a  duly  licensed  physician  and  surgeon,  are  you  not? 

"A.  I  am. 

"Q.  Did  you  obtain  your  medical  degree  from  Howard  University? 

"A.  I  did. 

"Q.  You  were  licensed  to  practice  your  profession  in  California 
in  1923  ? 

"A.  That  is  right. 

"Q.  And  you  have  practiced  here  ever  since? 

11  A.  No,  I  haven 't  practiced  here  since  1925.  I  had  the  license  from 
1923,  but  I  started  here  in  1925. 

' '  Q.  Are  you  engaged  in  general  practice  ? 

"A.  I  am. 

"Q.  You  are  commonly  known  as  Dr.  P.  Price  Cobbs,  are  you  not? 

' '  A.  That  is  right. 

"Q.  Dr.  Cobbs,  are  you  familiar  with  an  organization  in  Los  Angeles 
known  as  the  Arts,  Sciences  and  Professions  Council f 

"A.  Now,  Counsel,  this  is  a  very  peculiar  situation.  Since  time  im- 
memorial in  the  medical  profession,  which  has  had  a  wonderful  tradi- 
tion, being  very  close  to  patients  and  the  people,  for  that  reason,  be- 
cause of  the  close  relationship,  which  is  closer  than  that  of  a  lawyer, 
judge,  or  anybody  else,  I  cannot  understand  why  a  physician  would 
be  called  before  this  committee.  There  is  such  a  strong  bond  between 
him  and  his  patients.  Why  disrupt  that  bond?  Why  go  into  it?  I  can't 
see  why  any  association  in  my  work  should  be  brought  before  a  com- 
mittee here  publicly,  before  his  patients,  to  show  that  he  is  guilty  of 
something  when  he  has  practiced  all  these  years  with  honor  and  respect. 
I  can't  see  it.  Based  on  those  grounds  which  go  back  to  the  Fifth 
Amendment,  the  First  Amendment,  the  Fourteenth  and  Fifteenth 

"Q.  To  the  Federal  Constitution? 

"A.  To  the  Federal  Constitution  and  the  California  Articles  in  the 
State  Constitution,  I  refuse  to  answer  on  those  grounds. 

"Mr.  Combs:  May  it  be  stipulated,  Counsel,  as  to  subsequent  ques- 
tions which  may  be  asked  of  your  client  regarding  organizations  which 


UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  239 

have  been  described  as  subversive  or  as  Communist  front  or  Commu- 
nist-dominated by  either  official  federal  or  state  agencies,  that  in  the 
event  he  refuses  to  answer  such  questions  his  refusal  may  be  deemed 
to  be  predicated  upon  the  grounds  and  the  reasons  he  has  already 
taken  ? 

' '  Mr.  Margolis :  Mr.  Combs,  it  seems  to  me  that  we  should  not  assume 
in  advance  that  all  of  the  questions  will  be  so  cut  and  dried,  that  only 
the  same  constitutional  rights  are  going  to  be  violated.  You  may  violate 
others.  It  seems  to  me  that  he  should  be  able  to  state  his  grounds  as  to 
each  question.  However,  let  me  hasten  to  reassure  you  that  where 
he  relies  on  the  same  grounds  we  will  advise  him  to  say  the  same 
grounds. 

' '  Mr.  Combs :  That  is  entirely  satisfactory.  Thank  you  very  much. 

"Q.  Have  you  been  affiliated  in  any  way  as  a  member  or  sponsor  of 
an  organization  known  as  American  Youth  for  Democracy,  Dr.  Cobbs  ? 

"A.  I  would  like  to  add  or  would  like  to  say  the  same  grounds,  and 
also  add  that  being  in  a  minority  group  in  America  I  feel  very  keenly 
about  discrimination  in  schools,  in  the  medical  profession — 

' '  Chairman  Burns :  Does  the  witness  refuse  to  answer  the  question, 
if  so,  he  had  better  state  that  first  and  then  state  his  reasons. 

' '  The  Witness :  I  say  I  refuse  to  answer. 

' '  Chairman  Burns :  On  the  following  grounds. 

' '  The  Witness  :  On  the  grounds  mentioned  heretofore. 

"Mr.  Margolis:  I  think  he  indicated  he  meant  the  same  grounds,  but 
wanted  to  add  something. 

' '  Mr.  Combs :  I  think  that  is  clear.  Would  the  chairman  direct  him 
to  answer  the  question. 

' '  Mr.  Margolis :  I  don 't  think  he  has  finished. 

"Mr.  Combs:  Excuse  me. 

1 '  The  Witness :  Being  an  American  Negro  I  am  very  keenly  inter- 
ested in  my  people.  In  the  years  I  have  been  here  in  Los  Angeles  I 
think  I  have  stayed  very  close  to  the  people.  I  have  always  tried  to  work 
with  their  problems.  I  think  I  have  a  right  to  belong  to  any  organiza- 
tions that  I  have  been  a  member  of  on  those  grounds. 

"Mr.  Combs:  Will  the  chairman  instruct  the  witness  to  answer  the 
question  ? 

"Chairman  Burns:  Dr.  Cobbs,  the  reasons  you  have  given  for  re- 
fusing to  answer  the  question  are  deemed  insufficient  by  the  chair.  The 
chair  again  instructs  you  to  answer  the  question. 

' '  The  Witness :  I  refuse  with  the  same  answer,  same  grounds,  same 
stipulation. 

"Q.  (By  Mr.  Combs)  :  Have  you  been  connected  with  an  organiza- 
tion known  as  the  Civil  Rights  Congress,  Dr.  Cobbs? 


240  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

"A.  I  refuse  to  answer  with  the  same  answer,  same  grounds,  same 
stipulation. 

"Chairman  Burns:  Your  reasons  are  insufficient,  Doctor,  you  are 
instructed  to  answer  the  question. 

' '  The  Witness :  I  refuse  to  answer  on  the  same  grounds,  same  stipu- 
lation. 

"Q.  (By  Mr.  Combs)  :  Is  it  not  a  fact  that  you  are  chairman  of  the 
Medical  Division  of  the  Arts,  Sciences  and  Professions  Council? 

"A.  I  refuse  to  answer  on  the  same  grounds,  for  the  same  reasons  and 
same  stipulation. 

"Q.  Have  you  been  associated  with  an  organization  known  as  the 
Community  Medical  Center? 

"  A.  I  refuse  to  answer  for  the  same  grounds,  same  reasons  and  same 
stipulation. 

"Mr.  Combs:  Would  you  direct  him  to  answer? 

"Chairman  Burns:  The  reasons  given  are  invalid  and  the  chair  in- 
structs you  to  answer  the  question. 

' '  The  Witness :  I  refuse  to  answer  for  the  same  grounds  that  I  have 
given  before,  same  stipulation.  As  I  said  to  you  before,  we  are  among 
a  group  who  are  interested  particularly  in  low  cost  medical  care.  I  think 
if  we  can  get  that  for  the  people  who  are  in  the  lower  scale  and  the 
lowest  salary — we  are  always  interested  in  trying  to  do  something  for 
those  people.  I  refuse  to  answer  on  those  grounds. 

"Q.  (By  Mr.  Combs)  :  Have  you  ever  been  a  member  of  the  Commu- 
nist Party  or  the  Communist  Political  Association? 

"A.  I  refuse  to  answer  for  the  same  grounds,  same  stipulation  that 
I  have  given  before. 

"Chairman  Burns:  Your  reasons  are  insufficient,  Doctor.  The  chair 
instructs  you  to  answer. 

"The  Witness:  Same  answer,  same  grounds,  same  stipulation. 

"Mr.  Combs:  That  is  all. 

"Chairman  Burns:  The  witness  may  be  excused. 

"Mr.  Margolis:  The  witness  has  a  statement  he  would  like  to  make. 

' '  Chairman  Burns :  Very  well.  It  will  be  filed  as  an  exhibit  next  in 
order  and  placed  in  the  record. ' ' 

STATEMENT  SUBMITTED  BY  DR.  P.   PRICE  COBBS,  M.D. 

"I  have  practiced  medicine  in  Los  Angeles  for  many  years.  I  have 
followed  the  Hippocratic  oath  that  I  took  when  I  began  to  practice 
medicine.  It  has  been  my  basis  of  medical  ethics.  I  have  always  felt  a 
deep  and  keen  interest  for  all  community  problems.  I  live  and  practice 
in  a  section  of  the  lowest  paid  minority  group.  I  am  keenly  sensitive 
to  the  problems  of  my  people.  All  of  the  people  need  more  adequate 
low  cost  medical  services,  but  the  Negro  people,  because  of  the  dis- 


UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  241 

crimination  which  they  suffer,  need  it  even  more  desperately.  The  pur- 
pose of  this  hearing  is  to  attack  and  destroy  those  who  are  doing  the 
most  to  achieve  this  objective.  I  cannot  and  will  not  help  anyone  who 
persists  in  such  an  unwarranted  attack. 

"I  am  a  loyal  American  citizen  and  have  fought  for  my  country 
with  gallantry  and  honor  in  all  world  wars.  I  want  the  United  States, 
my  country,  to  be  strong.  It  will  be  helped  in  that  direction  by  those 
who  seek  to  better  the  conditions  of  all  the  people,  not  by  those  who 
are  engaged  in  the  kind  of  hearings  being  conducted  here.  I  shall  rest 
my  case  with  the  people  with  whom  I  have  worked  and  lived  all  my 
life.  P.  Price  Cobbs,  M.  D." 

TESTIMONY  OF  DR.  WILBUR  Z.  GORDON,  M.D. 

' '  Senator  Thompson :  The  committee  will  be  in  order.  Mr.  Counsel, 
will  you  call  the  first  witness. 

"Mr.  Combs:  Dr.  Gordon,  please. 

"Mr.  Omerberg:  Mr.  Combs,  I  wonder  if  you  would  have  the  indi- 
viduals sitting  on  your  side  of  the  table  identify  themselves  for  the 
record  so  that  I  can  be  sure  there  is  a  quorum  of  the  committee  here 
this  afternoon. 

"Mr.  Combs:  Counsel,  the  rules  of  the  committee  provide  that  for 
the  purposes  of  holding  hearings  any  one  member  of  the  committee, 
when  so  authorized,  can  sit  as  a  quorum  to  hold  a  hearing.  There  are 
two  members  of  the  committee  present  at  this  time.  The  third  member 
is  out  in  the  hall. 

"Mr.  Omerberg:  I  just  wanted  to  know  who  was  sitting  on  your 
side  of  the  table  and  to  know  who  is  a  member  of  the  committee. 

"Mr.  Combs:  This  is  Senator  Thompson,  a  member  of  the  committee, 
and  this  is  Senator  McCarthy. 

' '  Mr.  Omerberg :  Thank  you. 

"Mr.  Combs:  Your  name  is? 

"  Mr.  Omerberg :  Omerberg. 

' '  Mr.  Combs :  Your  initials  are  ? 

"Mr.  Omerberg:  M.J. 

' '  Mr.  Combs :  What  is  your  address  1 

"Mr.  Omerberg:  1584  Crossroads  of  the  World,  Hollywood  28. 

' '  Mr.  Combs :  You  appear  as  counsel  for  Dr.  Gordon  ? 

"Mr.  Omerberg:  Correct. 

"Q.  (By  Mr.  Combs  to  Dr.  Wilbur  Z.  Gordon)  :  Your  name  is  Dr. 
Wilbur  Z.  Gordon  ? 

' '  A.  That  is  correct. 

' '  Q.  What  is  your  residence  address  ? 

"A.  10823  South  Van  Ness. 


242  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN  CALIFORNIA 

"  Q.  You  are  a  physician  and  surgeon  ? 

"A.  I  am. 

"Q.  You  are  licensed  to  practice  in  California? 

"A.  I  am. 

' '  Q.  You  took  your  medical  degree  at  Johns  Hopkins  University  ? 

"A.  I  did. 

"  Q.  You  received  it  in  1940  ? 

"A.  I  did. 

"Q.  You  received  your  California  license  in  1943? 

' '  A.  I  believe  so,  yes,  1943. 

"Q.  Have  you  practiced  your  profession  in  California  since  that 
time? 

"A.  Except  for  a  period  of  my  army  service,  yes. 

"Q.  When  was  that,  Doctor? 

"A.  1944  through  1946. 

"  Q.  Did  you  hold  a  commission  ? 

"A.  I  did. 

"Q.  "What  was  it  ? 

' '  A.  Captain  in  the  Medical  Corps. 

"Q.  Are  you  associated  with  the  staffs  of  any  hospitals  at  the  present 
time,  or  clinics  ? 

"A.  Would  you  clarify  that  question  in  terms  of  specific  institutions 
that  you  might  be  interested  in  ? 

"Q.  Yes,  I  would  be  glad  to.  Let's  start  with  the  Community  Medical 
Center.  Are  you  affiliated  with  them? 

"A.  I  wish  to  state  in  answer  to  that  question  that  the  question  of 
any  association  between  me  and  the  Community  Medical  Center  is  by 
its  very  nature  a  question  infringing  upon  my  rights,  and  certainly 
touches  upon  what  appears  to  be  the  basic  purpose  of  this  committee. 
This  committee  has  subpenaed  me  to  appear  before  it  on  what  has  been 
announced  to  the  press  as  an  investigation  of  Communist  infiltration 
into  the  medical  profession.  The  date  set  for  my  appearance  before  this 
committee  is  Thursday,  December  9,  1954.  This  committee  then  an- 
nounces to  the  press  that  all  witnesses  appearing  before  this  committee 
en  Wednesday  or  Thursdaj^  are  unfriendly  witnesses. 

"Q.  Excuse  me.  Are  you  reading  a  statement?  Do  you  have  a  pre- 
pared statement  ? 

"A.  I  am  refreshing  my  memory. 

"  Q.  You  are  reading  it  ? 

"A.  I  am  really  transcribing  it. 

"Mr.  Omerberg:  They  are  notes. 

"Mr.  Combs:  Mr.  Witness  and  Counsel,  the  committee  has  a  rule 
which  it  has  applied  uniformly  all  during  the  hearings,  that  if  you 


UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  243 

have  such  a  statement  we  are  perfectly  willing  to  receive  it,  introduce 
it  into  evidence,  and  attach  it  as  an  exhibit  to  your  testimony  in  the 
transcript  so  that  it  will  appear  therein  in  full,  to  save  time — so  that 
the  committee  can  read  it.  There  is  no  purpose  in  reading  it  aloud  ex- 
cept to  take  up  the  time  of  the  committee. 

< '  The  Witness :  Very  well.  I  will,  therefore,  Mr.  Combs,  submit  my 
statement  to  the  committee.  (Handing  document  to  Mr.  Combs.) 

"Mr.  Combs:  Thank  you,  Doctor.  At  this  time  I  will  ask  that  it  be 
attached  to  the  transcript  of  the  hearing  in  connection  with  your  testi- 
mony. 

' '  The  "Witness :  Thank  you.  If  I  may  then  continue  to  answer  this 
question. 

"Mr.  Combs:  Go  ahead. 

"The  Witness:  The  question  of  any  association  of  myself  with  an 
organization  which  has  already  been  labeled  before  this  committee  raises 
fundamental  constitutional  questions  which,  as  a  good  American  citizen, 
I  propose  to  rely  on. 

"Chairman  Burns:  Pardon  me,  just  a  moment,  if  you  please. 

' '  The  Witness :  Yes,  sir. 

"Mr.  Combs :  Excuse  the  interruption,  please.  Will  you  continue? 

"The  Witness:  Yes.  That  this  same  Community  Medical  Center,  a 
prepaid  medical  plan  which  has  been  in  operation  for  some  years,  is  an 
answer  to  one  of  the  needs  of  the  people  in  the  field  of  medicine  and  it 
is  a  matter  that  the  county  medical  society  has  indicated  considers  to 
be  not  according  to  its  own  beliefs  and  attempts  to  label  as  subversive. 
This  organization,  however,  and  others  like  it,  some  of  which  are  much 
larger,  are  the  true  targets  of  this  investigation  in  the  long  run  and 
are  the  basic  reasons  why  the  county  medical  society  has  openly  stated 
they  called  in  this  committee. 

' '  The  Community  Medical  Center  appears  to  have  been  chosen  because 
it  is  a  relatively  small  group,  but  again  I  think  some  of  the  true  targets 
are  some  of  the  larger,  more  widespread  programs  in  the  community. 
Yet  this  in  the  long  run  will  stand  in  the  way  of  a  large  section  of  the 
people  of  the  Los  Angeles  community  from  getting  high  quality  medical 
care  at  rates  and  methods  of  payment  which  they  can  afford  to  pay,  and 
if  these  organizations  are  able  to  be  attacked  and  labeled  and  destroyed, 
then  the  cost  of  medical  care,  already  far  too  high,  will  perhaps  be 
exceeded.  People  will  not  be  able  to  afford  the  type  of  service  they  are 
entitled  to  as  American  citizens. 

"In  reply  to  this  question  I  therefore  stand  on  my  constitutional 
rights  guaranteed  by  the  State  of  California,  Article  I,  Section  9,  which 
states  that  every  citizen  may  freely  speak,  write  or  publish  sentiments 
on  all  subjects,  being  responsible  for  the  abuse  of  that  right,  and  that 


244  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

no  law  shall  be  passed  to  restrain  or  abridge  the  liberty  of  speech  or  of 
the  press. 

"Also  Section  10,  the  people  shall  have  the  right  to  freely  assemble 
together,  to  consult  for  the  common  good,  to  instruct  representatives 
and  petition  the  legislature  for  redress  of  grievances. 

"Also  Section  13,  no  person  shall  be  compelled  to  be  a  witness  against 
himself. 

"I  also  stand  on  the  First  and  Fifth  Amendments  to  the  United 
States  Constitution,  which  state  that  no  one  need  answer  a  question 
which  might  tend  to  incriminate  him  or  connect  him  with  some  act 
which  might  possibly  or  conceivably  be  considered  to  be  a  crime  or 
illegal  and  therefore  testify  against  himself  concerning  a  crime  of  which 
he  might  not  be  guilty. 

"This  committee,  I  believe,  is  illegally  constituted  to  inquire  into 
this  matter. 

"Q.  (By  Mr.  Combs)  :  Are  you  familiar,  doctor,  with  the  history  of 
the  Community  Medical  Center  as  an  organization;  what  I  mean  by 
that,  its  inception  and  type  of  development  as  an  organization  rather 
than  its  functional  operation  ? 

"A.  In  asking  this  question  do  you  mean  information  of  a  personal 
nature,  information  I  may  know  personally,  or  information  I  may  have 
gathered  in  a  series  of  articles  that  appear  about  the  Community 
Medical  Center  in  the  Daily  News  or  the  Los  Angeles  Times? 

"Q.  From  any  sources. 

"A.  Mr.  Combs 

"Q.  Yes. 

"A.  In  reply  to  your  question,  on  the  basis  of  the  articles  which 
appeared  in  the  Daily  News  and  in  the  Los  Angeles  Times,  probably  a  year 
or  more  ago,  I  can  state  I  recall  their  general  laudatory  nature  about 
the  activities  of  the  program  there.  As  to  any  personal  information 
which  I  may  have  about  the  Community  Medical  Center,  I  stand  again 
on  my  constitutional  rights  guaranteed  by  the  State  of  California, 
Article  I,  Section  9,  Sections  10,  11,  13,  and  also  on  the  First  and  Fifth 
Amendments  of  the  Federal  Constitution.  In  addition  to  which  I  will 
add  a  third :  I  believe  this  committee  has  no  constituted  authority  to 
investigate  this  question. 

"Mr.  Combs:  Mr.  Omerberg,  may  we  have  a  stipulation  in  the  in- 
terests of  saving  time  that  in  the  event  your  client  feels  impelled  to 
decline  to  give  answers  to  the  questions  that  may  be  asked  him  concern- 
ing organizations  that  have  been  characterized  as  Communist-dominated 
or  subversive  by  any  federal  or  state  agency  that  the  reasons  for  his 
refusal  shall  be  deemed  to  be  those  which  he  has  given  in  response  to 
the  two  questions  I  have  just  asked  him? 


UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  245 

"Mr.  Omerberg:  Would  you  read  the  stipulation  back?  (Record 
read.)  As  the  stipulation  is  worded  I  would  have  to  refuse  to  agree.  I 
would  offer  to  stipulate  that  any  declination  my  client  may  give  in  the 
future  to  any  question,  whethor  or  not  in  the  opinion  of  this  committee 
they  may  have  been  cited  as  subvershre,  or  whether  or  not  in  the  opinion 
of  this  committee  some  other  agency  has  cited  them  as  subversive  or 
Communist-dominated,  that  any  future  answer  which  is  refused  by  my 
client  will  be  refused  on  each  and  every  one  of  the  grounds  which  he 
has  heretofore  made  with  respect  to  the  questions  which  you  have  here- 
tofore asked  him. 

"Mr.  Combs:  So  stipulated.  Thank  you. 

"Q.  Now,  Dr.  Gordon,  are  you  familiar  with  an  organization  known 
as  the  Civil  Rights  Congress? 

"A.  Mr.  Combs,  I  give  the  same  answer  on  the  same  grounds  with 
the  same  stipulation. 

"Q.  You  decline  to  answer  the  question? 

"A.  I  decline  to  answer  the  question. 

"Q.  For  the  reasons  heretofore  given? 

"A.I  decline  to  answer  the  question,  correct. 

"Q.  Have  you  been  a  member  of  the  Civil  Rights  Congress? 

"A.  I  refuse  to  answer  that  question  for  the  same  reasons,  on  the 
same  grounds,  and  with  the  same  stipulation. 

' '  Mr.  Combs :  Will  the  chair  instruct  the  witness  to  answer  the 
question  ? 

' '  Chairman  Burns :  The  grounds  so  stated  by  you,  Dr.  Gordon,  are 
not  deemed  sufficient  for  refusing  to  answer,  therefore  the  chair  directs 
you  again  to  answer  the  question. 

' '  The  Witness :  May  I  ask  the  chair  on  what  grounds  my  reasons  are 
deemed  to  be  insufficient  ? 

"Chairman  Burns:  You  have  stated  that  your  reasons  for  refusing 
to  answer  the  question  are  on  the  grounds  that  the  answer  might  tend  to 
incriminate  you. 

' '  The  Witness :  I  beg  your  pardon,  sir,  that  is  only  part  of  my  answer. 

'  ■  Chairman  Burns :  Well,  let 's  consider  that  part  of  it. 

"The  Witness:  Let's  consider  the  whole  part  of  it. 

"Chairman  Burns:  Let's  consider  that  part  of  it.  Summing  it  up, 
grounds  of  self-incrimination  in  response  to  the  question  of  whether  you 
have  ever  heard  of  the  Civil  Rights  Congress  or  the  Los  Angeles  Medi- 
cal Center  in  the  chair's  mind  is  certainly  not  incriminating  in  any 
way.  Therefore,  in  the  opinion  of  the  chair  they  are  insufficient  reasons 
for  refusing  to  answer  the  question. 

"Mr.  Omerberg:  Mr.  Burns,  do  I  understand  from  your  last  state- 
ment you  do  not  consider  either  the  Civil  Rights  Congress  or  the  Com- 
munity Medical  Center  to  have  been  engaged  in  any  illegal  activities? 


246  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

"Chairman  Burns:  No,  that  is  not  what  I  said,  Counsel.  That  is  the 
object  of  this  inquiry.  It  is  to  ascertain  if  they  were  engaged  in  subver- 
sive activity.  I  don 't  say  they  are  at  the  moment.  The  reason  I  gave  was 
in  response  to  the  question,  'Did  the  witness  ever  hear  or  have  knowl- 
edge of  the  Civil  Rights  Congress?'  That  is  the  question  which  was  pro- 
pounded to  the  witness. 

' '  Mr.  Omerberg :  That  is  not  my  understanding  of  what  the  question 
was.  The  last  question  propounded — if  I  am  incorrect  I  would  like  Mr. 
Combs  to  correct  me — was  whether  or  not  this  witness  was  familiar  with 
the  Civil  Rights  Congress.  If  you  want  to  withdraw  the  question  and 
rephrase  it 

' '  Chairman  Burns :  I  will  rephrase  the  question.  Did  you  ever  hear  of 
the  Civil  Right  Congress? 

' '  Mr.  Combs :  Would  you  like  to  have  me  rephrase  the  question  ? 

"Mr.  Omerberg:  I  don't  care  one  way  or  the  other  who  rephrases  the 
question.  You  are  asking  the  questions. 

' '  Mr.  Combs :  I  will  ask  it  again.  I  think  this  will  clarify  it. 

"Q.  Are  you  familiar  with  an  organization  known  as  the  Civil  Rights 
Congress? 

"A.  I  refuse  to  answer  for  the  same  reasons,  with  the  same  stipula- 
tion and  on  the  same  grounds. 

"Mr.  Combs:  Now,  may  we  have  the  admonition  of  the  chair. 

"Chairman  Burns:  Your  refusal  to  answer  the  question  'are  you 
familiar  with  a  certain  organization'  in  the  mind  of  the  chair  is  in  no 
way  self-incriminating.  Under  the  laws  of  California  there  is  a  pro- 
vision granting  immunity  to  witnesses  testifying  regarding  anything 
of  which  they  have  knowledge.  "Whether  or  not  it  would  be  subversive 
would  be  covered  by  the  immunity  granted  a  witness  before  such  a  com- 
mittee. Therefore,  there  is  no  possible  way  of  incriminating  him  on  a 
violation  of  any  law.  The  reasons  he  states  are  insufficient.  It  is  impos- 
sible to  incriminate  him. 

"Mr.  Omerberg:  I  am  sure  you  know,  Mr.  Burns,  that  the  law  you 
refer  to  provides  no  protection  against  any  federal  prosecution. 

' '  Mr.  Combs :  Counsel,  as  long  as  we  are  getting  into  this  somewhat 
parenthetical  discussion  about  the  technicalities  of  the  law,  may  I  point 
out  to  you  that  there  is  and  has  been  a  statutory  provision  in  Cali- 
fornia for  a  good  many  years  providing  that  a  committee  functioning 
under  the  authority  of  the  California  State  Legislature  has  the  power 
to  confer  immunity  from  criminal  prosecution  on  any  witness  who 
appears  before  a  committee.  The  witness  then  may  be  compelled  to 
either  answer  the  question  or  suffer  a  possible  prosecution  for  contempt. 
The  time  to  raise  the  objection  concerning  his  possible  prosecution  in  a 
federal  forum  is  at  the  time  the  transcript  of  that  testimony  is  sought 


UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  247 

to  be  introduced  in  the  federal  forum.  At  that  time  the  objection  as  to 
incrimination,  in  any  opinion,  is  quite  sound.  But  that  is  before  the 
federal  body  and  not  the  state  forum.  There  are  decisions  to  that  effect 
which  are  binding  and  have  never  been  reversed.  That  is  our  under- 
standing of  the  condition  of  the  law. 

"Now,  in  this  particular  situation  the  witness  has  been  asked  as  to 
his  familiarity  with  an  organization.  He  has  seen  fit  to  refuse  to  answer 
the  question  for  the  reasons  heretofore  given.  Whether  in  your  opinion 
or  his  they  are  invalid  or  valid  is  more  or  less  beside  the  point.  The 
chair  has  already  ruled  that  in  his  opinion  the  grounds  are  invalid  and 
your  client  has  been  instructed  to  answer  the  question.  To  engage 
in  colloquy  between  you,  your  client,  me  and  Senator  Burns,  I  think  is 
simply  time-consuming.  We  have  a  stipulation  now  in  effect.  If  your 
client  sees  fit  not  to  answer  a  question  all  he  has  to  do  is  invoke  his  rea- 
sons and  apply  the  stiplation  and  we  will  ask  the  next  question. 

"Mr.  Omerberg:  I  agree  that  it  is  time-consuming.  I  am  just  sitting 
here  observing  that  all  of  this  has  occurred  because  my  client  asked  an 
innocent  question  and  the  chairman  chose  to  answer  it.  If  this  has  been 
a  waste  of  time,  as  I  suspect  in  some  respects  it  may  have  been,  why,  I 
don't  think  that  any  censure  should  be  placed  on  the  witness. 

"Chairman  Burns:  Does  the  witness  refuse  to  answer  the  question? 
If  so,  on  what  grounds? 

"Mr.  Omerberg:  Do  it  again. 

' '  The  Witness  :  I  refuse  to  answer  the  question  on  the  grounds  already 
stated,  for  the  reasons  given,  and  with  the  stipulations. 

• '  Chairman  Burns :  Very  well. 

"The  Witness:  All  of  the  stipulations. 

"Q.  (By  Mr.  Combs)  :  Have  you  ever  been  a  member  of  the  Medical 
Division  of  the  Arts,  Sciences  and  Professions  Council  in  Los  Angeles  ? 

"A.  I  refuse  to  answer  this  question,  Mr.  Combs,  for  the  same  rea- 
sons, on  the  same  grounds  and  with  the  same  stipulations. 

■ '  Chairman  Burns :  Your  grounds  are  deemed  insufficient  and  the 
chairs  instructs  you  to  answer  the  question. 

' '  The  Witness :  I  refuse  to  answer  the  question  for  the  same  reasons, 
on  the  same  grounds,  and  with  the  same  stipulation. 

"Q.   (By  Mr.  Combs)  :  Were  you  here  yesterday,  Dr.  Gordon? 

' '  A.  May  I  ask  the  legislative  purpose  of  that  question  ? 

"Q.  I  think  not.  It  is  a  perfectly  proper  question  in  my  mind.  You 
can  ask  the  chair  to  rule  on  its  materiality  if  you  wish. 

"Mr.  Omerberg:  I  would  like  to  know  the  materiality. 

1 '  Mr.  Combs :  I  don 't  mind  explaining  the  reason  for  it.  If  you  were 
here  yesterday  there  was  certain  testimony  adduced  before  the  com- 
mittee. I  want  to  know  whether  or  not  you  heard  that  testimony.  If  you 


248  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN  CALIFORNIA 

did  hear  it  I  want  to  ask  you  some  questions  about  it.  If  you  were 
not  here  it  obviously  would  be  pointless  to  do  so. 

' '  The  Witness :  I  was  not  at  this  meeting  yesterday  at  any  time. 

"Q.  (By  Mr.  Combs)  :  Are  you  familiar  with  a  booklet  which  was 
issued  by  the  Arts,  Sciences  and  Professions  Council  of  Los  Angeles 
and  which  was  described  yesterday  by  a  witness  as  entitled  'Yours  for 
a  Genuine  Brotherhood'? 

"A.  Mr.  Combs,  would  you  describe  the  pamphlet  that  you  mentioned 
in  greater  detail,  including  what  its  contents  were? 

"Q.  I  cannot  describe  the  contents  because  it  comprises  something 
like  50  pages. 

"A.  What  is  it  about? 

"Q.  It  primarily  concerns  itself  with  alleged  discrimination  in  hos- 
pitals in  the  City  of  Los  Angeles,  or  the  immediate  vicinity  of  that 
city.  It  was  issued,  according  to  the  testimony,  by  the  Arts,  Sciences 
and  Professions  Council,  Medical  Division,  and  was  circulated  at  meet- 
ings held  by  the  Medical  Division  of  that  organization. 

"A.  I  decline  to  answer  that  question  on  the  grounds  already  stipu- 
lated. However,  if  what  you  say  was  in  that  pamphlet  it  sounds  like  it 
must  have  been  something  rather  worthwhile,  if  it  pointed  out  some 
of  the  inequities  in  our  present  society. 

"Q.  You  don't  know  anything  about  it  yourself,  do  you? 

' '  A.  Are  you  asking  about  the  pamphlet  or  are  you  asking  about  my 
knowledge  of  inequities  in  society  ? 

"Q.  I  asked  you  if  you  knew  anything  about  the  booklet.  You  said 
you  refused  to  answer  on  the  grounds  that  it  might  tend  to  incriminate 
you,  and  for  the  other  reasons  you  have  heretofore  given.  Then  you 
asked  me  to  describe  it  in  more  detail.  I  did  so  to  the  best  of  my  ability, 
and  you  began  to  editorialize  on  its  contents. 

"A.  On  the  basis  of  what  you  said,  Mr.  Combs. 

"Q.  Do  you  have  any  first  hand  knowledge  of  the  booklet? 

"A.  I  give  the  same  answer.  I  refuse  to  answer  for  the  grounds, 
reasons  and  stipulations  already  agreed  to. 

"Mr.  Combs :  Will  the  chair  direct  the  witness  to  answer  the  question. 

"Chairman  Burns:  The  grounds  stated  for  the  refusal  to  answer 
the  question  are  insufficient,  Doctor,  and  you  are  instructed  to  answer 
the  question. 

' '  Mr.  Omerberg :  I  think  I  ought  to  point  out  in  this  type  of  question, 
Mr.  Combs,  or  Mr.  Burns,  or  both  of  you,  that  in  all  fairness  to  the 
witness  if  you  are  going  to  now  order  him  to  answer  the  question  about 
his  familiarity  concerning  a  document  with  as  limited  a  description 
as  Mr.  Combs  was  able  to  give,  that  the  least  this  committee  could  do 
would  be  to  show  the  pamphlet  to  the  witness  and  let  him  examine  it. 


UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN  CALIFORNIA  249 

"Chairman  Burns:  If  the  witness  does  not  know,  he  can  certainly 
say  he  does  not  know. 

"Mr.  Omerberg:  I  do  not  want  to  engage  in  argument  with  you, 
but  I  have  a  strong  suspicion  that  in  my  own  history  there  are  a  good 
many  pamphlets  and  books  which  I  have  read  which  I  don't  remember, 
especially  from  the  loose  sort  of  description  which  Mr.  Combs  gave.  A 
look  at  it  might  serve  some  purpose. 

1 '  Chairman  Burns :  If  you  were  asked  a  question  of  whether  or  not 
you  remembered  it  and  you  did  not,  you  would  say,  '  I  don 't  remember. ' 
The  witness  has  the  same  privilege  here. 

1 '  Mr.  Omerberg :  The  witness  does  not  have  to  answer  it  the  same 
way  you  would,  Mr.  Burns. 

1 '  Chairman  Burns :  He  can  answer  any  way  he  pleases,  but  he  has 
not  answered  it  yet. 

"The  Witness:  Considering  the  whole  atmosphere  in  which  this 
hearing  is  held,  the  publicity  and  the  forces  at  play  here  at  this  meeting, 
I  stand  on  my  constitutional  rights  to  refuse  to  answer  this  question 
that  are  already  stipulated  and  agreed  upon. 

"Q.   (By  Mr.  Combs)  :  For  the  reasons  heretofore  given? 

"A.  For  the  reasons  heretofore  given. 

' '  Mr.  Combs :  Now,  Mr.  Witness  and  Counsel,  I  intend  to  ask  a  series 
of  questions  about  meetings.  I  would  prefer  to  ask  all  of  the  questions 
first — there  are  about  six — and  then  the  witness  can  answer  in  any  way 
he  pleases  about  all  of  them.  Is  that  satisfactory? 

"Mr.  Omerberg:  Can  you  tell  me  what  the  meetings  are? 

' '  Mr.  Combs :  Yes,  of  the  Arts,  Sciences  and  Professions  Council. 

1  *  Mr.  Omerberg :  In  that  case  you  may  do  it. 

"Mr.  Combs:  All  right. 

"Q.  Is  it  not  a  fact,  Dr.  Gordon,  that  on  the  seventeenth  day  of 
August,  1951,  at  7410  Sunset  Boulevard,  Los  Angeles,  you  attended  a 
meeting  of  the  Medical  Division  of  the  Arts,  Sciences  and  Professions 
Council; 

' '  And  is  it  not  a  further  fact  that  on  the  twenty- third  day  of  August, 

1951,  at  406  South  Holt  Street  in  the  City  of  Los  Angeles  you  attended 
a  meeting  of  the  Medical  Division  of  the  Arts,  Sciences  and  Professions 
Council; 

"And  is  it  not  a  further  fact  that  on  the  fourteenth  day  of  March, 

1952,  at  7410  Sunset  Boulevard,  Los  Angeles,  you  attended  a  meeting 
of  the  Medical  Division  of  the  Arts,  Sciences  and  Professions  Council; 

"And  is  it  not  also  true  that  on  the  eighteenth  day  of  April,  1952, 
you  attended  a  forum  meeting  of  the  Medical  Division  of  the  Arts, 
Sciences  and  Professions  Council  in  the  City  of  Los  Angeles  at  Stanley 
HaU; 


250  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

"And  is  it  not  a  further  fact  that  on  the  fourteenth  day  of  June, 
1952,  you  attended  a  meeting  of  the  Arts,  Sciences  and  Professions 
Council  Equal  Bights  Conference  held  in  the  Alexandria  Hotel  in  Los 
Angeles ; 

' '  And  is  it  not  a  further  fact  that  you  were  a  speaker  on  the  thirty- 
first  day  of  October,  1952,  at  a  meeting  of  the  Medical  Division  of  the 
Arts,  Sciences  and  Professions  Council  which  was  held  at  7410  Sunset 
Boulevard,  Los  Angeles? 

"A.  I,  of  course,  decline  to  answer  this  question  on  the  grounds 
which  I  will  give  in  a  moment.  I  also  point  out  that  these  questions 
avoid  the  situation  within  the  Los  Angles  County  Medical  Association 
and  the  methods  that  they  used  to  attempt  to  drive  out  of  the  mem- 
bership the  doctors  of  independent  mind  and  thought  on  political  and 
economic  questions  as  they  affect  medicine,  in  order  to  dominate  the 
association  so  completely  that  no  doctor  will  be  able  to  express  with 
freedom  his  beliefs  as  an  individual. 

"The  grounds  for  my  refusal  to  answer  are  according  to  the  Con- 
stitution of  the  United  States,  Article  I,  Sections  9,  10,  and  13. 

"Q.  They  are  covered  by  your  stipulation? 

"A.  That  is  right.  I  refuse  to  answer  on  the  basis  of  the  grounds 
heretofore  made,  and  the  stipulation. 

' '  Mr.  Combs :  May  we  have  a  ruling  ? 

' '  Chairman  Burns :  Your  reasons  for  refusing  to  answer  the  ques- 
tion are  insufficient.  You  are  instructed  to  answer. 

"The  Witness:  I  decline  to  answer  on  the  same  grounds. 

"Q.  (By  Mr.  Combs)  :  Are  you  now  or  have  you  ever  been  a  mem- 
ber of  the  Communist  Party  or  the  Communist  Political  Association? 

"A.  I  decline  to  answer  that  question  on  the  grounds  already  stated, 
according  to  the  constitutional  points  mentioned  and  the  stipulations 
that  have  been  agreed  upon. 

"Mr.  Combs:  That  is  all.  May  the  witness  be  excused? 

"Chairman  Burns:  The  witness  may  be  excused. 

WRITTEN  STATEMENT  SUBMITTED  BY  DR.  WILBUR  Z.  GORDON,  M.D. 
Committee  Exhibit  No.  17 

"This  committee  has  subpenaed  me  to  appear  before  it  on  what  has 
been  announced  to  the  press  as  an  investigation  of  '  Communist  infiltra- 
tion into  the  Medical  Association.' 

' '  The  date  set  for  my  appearance  before  this  committee  is  Thursday, 
December  9,  1954.  The  committee  then  announces  to  the  press  that 
all  witnesses  appearing  before  this  committee  on  Wednesday  and 
Thursday  are  unfriendly  witnesses.  Thus,  this  committee  has  already 


UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  251 

attempted  to  implicate  me  and  to  create  the  public  impression  that  I 
am  involved  in  a  so-called  plot. 

"It  is  not  I,  but  this  committee  which  is  unfriendly  and  actually 
involved  in  a  plot.  There  is  a  plot  all  right!  But  the  plot  is  one  of  a 
few  leaders  of  the  Los  Angeles  County  Medical  Society  who,  by  or- 
ganizing in  cooperation  with  this  committee  a  hue  and  cry  of  Commu- 
nism and  Communist  plot,  are  really  out  to  make  the  membership  of 
the  Los  Angeles  County  Medical  Society  a  heil-shouting  ya-voting 
appendage  to  the  high-handed  decisions  of  the  board  of  the  association. 

"They  propose  and  are  working  actively  to  eliminate  independent 
and  dissident  opinion  from  the  association.  These  leaders  consider 
themselves  so  vulnerable  that  when  two  candidates  for  councilors,  who 
were  members  in  good  standing,  received  22  percent  of  the  total  asso- 
ciation vote,  they  became  hysterical  and  called  it  a  Communist  plot. 

"The  platform  of  these  two  physicians  had  nothing  whatsoever  to 
do  with  Communism  or  Socialism.  But  these  frightened,  narrow  men 
feel  threatened  by  any  program  of  social  welfare  and  democracy.  They 
feel  that  all  who  do  not  agree  with  them  on  every  social  and  political 
question  must  be  subversive.  And  they  are  working  hard  to  make  the 
public  believe  it. 

"But  let  the  public  know  what  the  program  of  these  two  physicians 
was.  Let  the  public  judge  if  it  was  subversive. 

"The  platform  had  as  its  main  points:  (1)  Make  the  association's 
operation  more  democratic  and  more  responsible  to  the  will  of  the 
majority  by  having  more  business  meetings  at  which  new  business 
may  be  introduced  and  discussed.  At  present,  there  are  only  two  meet- 
ings a  year — nomination  and  election  meetings  at  which  no  new  busi- 
ness may  be  brought  up. 

"(2)  End  discrimination  in  all  hospitals  in  Los  Angeles  County 
both  as  respects  to  patients  and  the  medical  and  nursing  staff.  This 
could  not  be  considered  extreme  because  many  hospitals,  such  as  Queen 
of  Angels,  County  Hospital,  and  Temple,  among  others,  were  already 
practicing   this  policy. 

"  (3)  Act  to  make  the  association  work  for  more  humanitarian  goals 
in  the  community  rather  than  conduct  a  narrow  defense  of  the  eco- 
nomic interests  of  its  members.  Along  this  line,  these  candidates  sup- 
ported an  integrated  program  of  hospital  construction,  a  new  county 
contagious  disease  and  TB  hospital.  They  urged  active  participation 
in  the  campaign  to  eliminate  smog  and  to  end  the  primitive  sewage  and 
refuse  disposal  system. 

"(4)  Act  in  closer  cooperation  with  the  Health  Department  for  the 
improvement  of  the  health  standards  of  the  community. 

"This  platform  and  campaign  so  alarmed  some  of  these  leaders  of 
the  association  that  they  called  in  the  editors  of  a  lunatic-fringe  hate 


252  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN  CALIFORNIA 

sheet.  Two  separate  copies  of  an  issue  of  this  publication,  vilifying 
members  of  the  association  who  openly  supported  the  program,  were 
mailed  to  every  member  of  the  association  on  the  association's  address- 
ing machine.  In  spite  of  this,  a  sizeable  vote  was  registered  for  the 
viciously  maligned  candidates. 

"Later,  many  of  us,  in  concert  with  leading  physicians  of  national 
stature,  campaigned  against  a  political  conformity  oath  for  member- 
ship within  the  society  and  registered  a  fair  minority  vote.  The  validity 
of  that  minority  vote  is  illustrated  amply  this  week  by  the  hearings 
conducted  by  this  committee  and  the  actions  of  the  leaders  of  the  as- 
sociation. 

"I  deeply  resent  this  attempt  to  impugn  my  reputation  and  will 
take  every  proper  means  to  correct  this  total  distortion  of  my  activities. 

(Signed)  W.  Z.  Gordon,  M.D." 

TESTIMONY  OF  LENORE  SUTTON 

"Q.  (By  Mr.  Combs)  :  Would  you  give  the  reporter  your  address, 
please  ? 

"A.  I  feel  that  this  committee  is  here 

"Q.  Wait  a  minute.  There  is  a  question  pending.  We  asked  you  to 
give  us  your  address. 

"Mr.  Omerberg:  This  may  be  a  situation,  Mr.  Combs,  in  which  the 
witness  has  every  right  to  refuse  an  address  in  view  of  the  lists  of 
questions  and  addresses  which  you  have  been  reading  off  here  while 
I  have  been  here  today.  Before  you  make  any  presumptions  about  your 
rights,  I  think  you  should  give  the  witness  a  chance  to  answer  the 
question. 

"Mr.  Combs:  This  question,  Counsel,  is  merely  intended  to  develop 
for  the  record  her  present  residence  address,  not  where  she  lived  in 
the  past,  which  are  the  questions  you  are  referring  to. 

"Mr.  Omerberg:  I  am  not  necessarily  referring  to  addresses  in  the 
past.  Let  me  consult  with  my  client  for  a  moment. 

"Mr.  Combs:  All  right. 

' '  Mr.  Omerberg :  The  witness  will  answer. 

"The  Witness:  My  address  is  3342  West  27th  Street,  Los  Angeles. 

' '  Mr.  Combs :  Thank  you. 

"Q.  How  long  have  you  resided  at  that  address? 

"A.  Approximately  two  years. 

"Q.  What  is  your  occupation? 

"A.  I  am  unemployed. 

"Q.  Were  you  ever  employed  by  Dr.  Wilbur  Z.  Gordon,  who  pre- 
ceded you  on  the  stand? 

"A.  Since  it  has  been  stated  in  the  daily  press  that  this  committee 
is  here  at  the  request  of  the  Los  Angeles  County  Medical  Association 


UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN  CALIFORNIA  253 

to  investigate  subversive  activities  in  the  medical  profession,  and  I  feel 
that  this  committee  is  here  to  implement  attacks  upon  professional  and 
nonprofessional  people  who  support  low-cost  medical  care,  who  sup- 
port non-discrimination  in  medical  facilities,  I  cannot  answer  this  ques- 
tion. 

1 '  I  further  feel  that  this  is  a  trial,  even  though  it  is  not  so  stated,  of 
political  beliefs  and  has  nothing  whatsoever  to  do  with  professional 
competency. 

"Further,  I  feel  that  you  are  infringing  upon  my  rights  as  an 
individual  to  think  and  speak  and  assemble  with  others  as  I  choose. 

"Further,  I  feel  if  I  answer  this  question  that  this  would  be  an 
abuse  of  the  First  and  Fifth  Amendments.  I  feel  that  this  committee 
is  illegally  constituted.  And  further,  I  feel  that  I  am  not  compelled  to 
be  a  witness  against  myself  because  I  feel  that  the  purpose  in  being 
here  is  to  smear  people  who  support  low-cost  medical  care,  who  are 
against  racial  discrimination  in  medical  facilities. 

"Therefore,  I  will  not  serve  this  committee  in  any  way  in  giving 
them  any  kind  of  information  or  any  kind  of  association  which  might 
in  any  way  help  them  to  engage  or  help  some  court  or  federal  agency 
in  false  prosecutions. 

"I  rely  on  the  First  and  Fifth  Amendments  of  the  United  States 
Constitution,  and  also  Article  I,  Sections  9,  10  and  13  of  the  California 
State  Constitution. 

"Mr.  Combs:  Did  the  witness  include  the  Fifth  Amendment? 

"Mr.  Omerberg:  She  did,  and  if  there  is  any  question  about  it  I 
would  like  to  have  it  understood  at  this  time  that  the  witness  did  claim 
the  privilege  as  provided  by  the  Fifth  Amendment  of  the  United  States 
Constitution,  as  well  as  the  First  Amendment  and  as  well  as  Article  I, 
Sections  9,  10  and  13  of  the  California  Constitution,  and  the  further 
ground  that  the  committee  is  illegally  constituted.  I  will  stipulate  that 
her  refusals  in  the  future  may  be  based  on  all  of  the  grounds  which 
have  been  stated,  in  addition  to  any  others  she  may  have. 

"Mr.  Combs:  "Will  you  further  stipulate  that  the  chair  will  be 
deemed  to  have  ruled  that  her  reasons  for  refusing  to  answer  are  in- 
sufficient ? 

' '  Mr.  Omerberg :  No,  sir. 

"Mr.  Combs:  You  will  not  so  stipulate? 

"Mr.  Omerberg:  That  is  correct. 

' '  Mr.  Combs :  Very  well. 

' '  Chairman  Burns :  The  chair  holds  that  the  reasons  for  refusing  to 
answer  are  insufficient  and  asks  the  witness  to  answer  the  question,  and 
so  instructs  her. 

' '  The  Witness :  I  still  decline  to  answer  that  question  on  the  previous 
grounds  stated,  the  First  and  Fifth  Amendments. 


254  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

"Mr.  Omerberg:  That  is  all  right. 

"Mr.  Combs:  It  is  covered  by  your  stipulation,  Mrs.  Sutton. 

"The  Witness:  Thank  you. 

"Q.   (By  Mr.  Combs)  :  Is  your  husband's  name  Ronald  Sutton? 

"A.  I  refuse  to  answer  on  the  same  grounds  previously  stated. 

' '  Chairman  Burns :  Well  now,  you  certainly  can 't  be  incriminated 
for  refusing  to  answer  a  question  like  that.  There  is  no  question  about 
that  being  insufficient.  You  are  instructed  to  answer. 

' '  The  Witness :  I  still  decline  to  answer  that  question  on  the  grounds 
previously  stated  and  so  stipulated. 

"Q.   (By  Mr.  Combs)  :  Are  you  married? 

"A.  I  still  decline  to  answer — not  still  decline,  but  I  decline  to  an- 
swer this  question  on  the  grounds  previously  stated  and  so  stipulated. 

"Chairman  Burns:  The  same  ruling  from  the  chair.  You  are  in- 
structed to  answer  the  question. 

' '  The  Witness :  I  refuse  to  answer  this  question  on  the  same  grounds 
previously  stated. 

' '  Mr.  Omerberg :  Before  we  go  any  further,  Mr.  Combs 

' '  Mr.  Combs :  Let  me  make  one  statement. 

"Mr.  Omerberg:  No.  I  want  to  find  out  whether  or  not  the  prior 
order  of  the  chair  had  an  answer  by  the  witness.  She  answered  this 
last  order  to  answer  with  a  declination,  but  I  don't  know  whether  she 
answererd 

' '  Mr.  Combs :  Let 's  ask  the  reporter  to  read  it  and  make  sure. 

"Chairman  Burns:  I  think  she  did.  (Whereupon  a  portion  of  the 
record  was  read.) 

' '  Mr.  Combs :  I  am  now  about  to  ask  a  series  of  questions  about  meet- 
ings. I  think  all  of  them  relate  to  the  Arts,  Sciences  and  Professions 
Council,  Medical  Division. 

"Mr.  Omerberg:  I  will  anticipate  you,  Mr.  Combs,  in  this  matter. 

• '  Mr.  Combs :  Just  a  moment. 

' '  Mr.  Omerberg :  All  right.  I  thought  you  were  through. 

' '  Mr.  Combs :  With  one  exception  which  relates  to  the  Community 
Medical  Center,  Los  Angeles. 

"Mr.  Omerberg:  This  witness  does  not  care  to  answer  questions  in 
a  group. 

"Mr.  Combs:  She  intends  to  use  the  stipulation  as  to  each  one? 

"Mr.  Omerberg:  I  don't  know  what  her  intentions  are. 

"Mr.  Combs:  I  will  ask  them  anyway. 

"  Q.  Is  it  not  a  fact,  Mrs.  Sutton,  that  you  attended  a  meeting  of  the 
Medical  Division  of  the  Arts,  Sciences  and  Professions  Council  at  830 
North  Melrose  Hill 

"A.  Pardon  me  just  a  moment.  I  am  sorry. 

"Q.  on  May  11,  1951  ? 


UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  255 

"Mr.  Omerberg:  You  asked  her  to  state  her  name  at  the  outset  of  the 
hearings.  Her  name  was  stated  as  Lenore  Sutton.  There  has  been  a 
refusal  to  answer  with  respect  to  the  marriage  status.  Either  we  are 
going  to  get  involved  in  a  lot  of  quibbling  or  you  will  have  to  drop 
the  word  'Mrs.' 

"Mr.  Combs:  Shall  I  use  the  word  'Miss'? 

"Mr.  Omerberg:  I  believe  you  could  just  say  Lenore  Sutton. 

■ '  Mr.  Combs :  Shall  I  say  Lenore  Sutton  every  time  ? 

"Mr.  Omerberg:  I  don't  care  whether  you  say  it  every  time  or  not, 
or  whether  you  say  it  at  all.  Just  don't  use  an  appellation  which  desig- 
nates the  status  unless  you  want  to  stipulate  to  the  fact  that  the  use 
of  it  and  the  response  on  her  part  does  not  have  any  signficance. 

"Mr.  Combs:  I  will  do  the  best  I  can  under  the  circumstances.  If  I 
were  to  call  her  'Madame  Witness,'  would  that  be  satisfactory? 

"The  Witness:  I  think  'Witness'  would  be  satisfactory,  Mr.  Combs. 

"Mr.  Combs:  All  right. 

"Q.  Is  it  not  a  fact  that  you  attended  a  meeting  of  the  Medical  Divi- 
sion of  the  Arts,  Sciences  and  Professions  Council  at  830  North  Mel- 
rose Hill,  which  was  a  private  residence  in  Los  Angeles,  on  the  11th 
day  of  May,  1951  ? 

"A.  Has  someone  testified  that  I  was  at  this  meeting  which  you 
describe  ? 

"Q.  I  am  not  answering  questions,  Madame  Witness,  that  is  your 
role. 

"A.  In  that  case,  Mr.  Combs,  I  shall  have  to  decline  to  answer  that 
question  and  I  shall  take  the  privilege  of  the  First  and  Fifth  Amend- 
ments of  the  United  States  Constitution,  and  also  Article  I,  Sections 
9,  10  and  13,  of  the  California  State  Constitution. 

"Q.  Is  it  not  a  fact  that  on  the  12th  day  of  August,  1951,  at  9620 
Monte  Mar  Drive,  a  private  residence  in  Los  Angeles,  you  attended  a 
meeting  of  the  Medical  Division  of  the  Arts,  Sciences  and  Professions 
Council? 

"A.  It  would  appear  to  me  that  someone  or  something  had  stated 
or  given  you  the  idea  that  I  was  at  this  meeting  that  you  describe  and 
previously  described  and,  therefore,  it  also  occurs  to  me  that  it  is  a 
strict  American  tradition  that  when  you  are  accused  of  something,  the 
accused  is  faced  by  the  accuser.  Therefore,  I  ask  this  question:  Did 
someone  state  that  I  was  at  a  meeting  that  you  have  just  described? 

"Q.  I  will  give  you  the  same  answer  I  gave  to  your  previous  ques- 
tion :  I  am  asking  the  questions  and  not  you. 

"A.  I  understand  that,  sir.  Therefore,  I  would  decline  to  answer 
that  question  on  the  First  and  Fifth  Amendments  of  the  United  States 
Constitution  and  on  Article  I,  Sections  9,  10,  and  13,  of  the  Constitu- 
tion of  the  State  of  California. 


256  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN  CALIFORNIA 

' '  Q.  Very  well.  Next  question :  Is  it  not  a  fact  that  on  the  seventeenth 
day  of  August,  1951,  you  attended  a  meeting  of  the  Medical  Division 
of  the  Arts,  Sciences  and  Professions  Council  at  7410  Sunset  Boulevard, 
Los  Angeles? 

"A.  It  also  appears  to  me  that  you  are  trying  in  some  way  to  asso- 
ciate me  with  this  organization  that  you  have  mentioned.  I  also  feel 
that  along  with  the  doctors  subpenaed  here  yesterday  and  today  that 
you  are  trying  to  smear  me.  Therefore,  I  decline  to  answer  this  ques- 
tion on  the  grounds  of  the  First  and  Fifth  Amendments  of  the  United 
States  Constitution,  and  Article  I,  Sections  9,  10,  and  13,  of  the  Cali- 
fornia State  Constitution,  and  further  on  the  grounds  that  this  com- 
mittee is  illegally  constituted. 

"Q.  It  is  not  a  fact  that  on  the  twenty-third  day  of  August,  1951, 
you  attended  a  meeting  of  the  Medical  Division  of  the  Arts,  Sciences 
and  Professions  Council  at  406  South  Holt  Street,  Los  Angeles? 

"A.  I  decline  to  answer  that  question  on  the  grounds  previously 
stated. 

"Mr.  Combs:  Now,  Mr.  Reporter,  will  you  turn  back  to  the  inception 
of  the  witness'  testimony  and  give  us  the  address  that  she  stated  for 
the  record? 

"(Record  read  as  requested.) 

"Q.  (By  Mr.  Combs)  :  Did  you  ever  live  at  406  South  Holt  Street, 
Los  Angeles,  and  were  you  living  there  on  August  23,  1951  ? 

' '  A.  I  refuse  to  answer  that  question  for  the  same  reasons  previously 
stated. 

"Q.  Is  it  not  a  fact  that  you  attended  a  meeting  of  the  Medical 
Division  of  the  Arts,  Sciences  and  Professions  Council  on  September  7, 
1951,  at  109  North  Highland  Street,  Los  Angeles,  which  is  the  resi- 
dence  

"A.  I  decline  to  answer  that  question  on  the  grounds  previously 
stated. 

"Q.  Is  it  not  a  fact  that  on  the  thirtieth  day  of  October,  1931,  you 
attended  a  meeting  of  the  Medical  Division  of  the  Arts,  Sciences  and 
Professions  Council  at  7410  Sunset  Boulevard,  Los  Angeles? 

"A.  You  said  1931.  I  was  only  three  years  old  at  that  time,  sir. 

"Q.  1951.  I  am  sorry. 

"Mr.  Omerberg:  Do  we  have  the  question  now? 

"The  Witness:  Would  you  repeat  the  question? 

"Q.  (By  Mr.  Combs)  :  Is  it  not  a  fact  that  on  the  thirtieth  day  of 
October,  1951,  you  attended  a  meeting  of  the  Executive  Board  of  the 
Medical  Division  of  the  Arts,  Sciences  and  Professions  Council  at  7410 
Sunset  Boulevard,  Los  Angeles? 

"  A.  I  should  like  to  state  that  under  any  other  circumstances,  if  this 
was  not  a  hearing  of  a  committee  of  this  type,  that  I  would  be  happy 


UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  257 

to  discuss  low-cost  medical  care,  and  whether  or  not  there  is  racial 
discrimination  in  hospitals,  whether  or  not  we  could  do  something 
about  health  hazards  in  this  city  and  county.  However,  since  these 
questions  are  being  asked  by  this  kind  of  a  committee,  and  because  I 
feel  it  is  illegally  constituted,  I  shall  have  to  refuse  to  answer  that 
question  on  the  grounds  previously  stated. 

"Q.  Is  it  not  a  fact  that  on  December  7,  1951,  you  attended  a 
meeting  of  the  Executive  Board  of  the  Medical  Division  of  the  Arts, 
Sciences  and  Professions  Council  at  830  North  Melrose  Hill,  Los 
Angeles  ? 

"A.  I  should  also  like  to  state  that  this  committee  is  displaying  all 
sorts  of  infringements  upon  my  rights  as  a  citizen.  My  rights  to  have 
ideas.  I  feel  that  we  can  only  have  growth  through  free  expression  of 
ideas  and  through  free  exchange.  However,  obviously  there  is  no  ex- 
change of  ideas  between  us.  Therefore,  I  shall  have  to  refuse  to  answer 
this  question  on  the  grounds  previously  stated. 

"Q.  Is  it  not  a  fact  that  on  the  eleventh  day  of  January,  1952,  you 
attended  a  meeting  of  the  Executive  Board  of  the  Medical  Division 
of  the  Arts,  Sciences  and  Professions  Council  at  7410  Sunset  Boule- 
vard, Los  Angeles? 

"A.  Here  I  should  like  to  state  that  this  committee  is  trying  to 
smear  and  intimidate  witnesses,  not  only  witnesses,  but  people  who 
read  the  daily  press  and  who  are  at  these  hearings  today  as  an  audience. 
I  refuse  to  be  intimidated.  Therefore,  I  refuse  to  answer  the  question 
on  the  grounds  previously  stated. 

"Q.  Is  it  not  a  fact  that  on  the  first  day  of  February,  1952,  you  at- 
tended a  meeting  of  the  Executive  Board  of  the  Medical  Division  of 
the  Arts,  Sciences  and  Professions  Council  at  535^  North  Spaulding 
Street,  Los  Angeles? 

"A.  Would  you  repeat  the  question,  please,  Counsel? 

"Q.  Is  it  not  a  fact  that  on  the  first  day  of  February,  1952,  you 
attended  a  meeting  of  the  Executive  Board  of  the  Medical  Division  of 
the  Arts,  Sciences  and  Professions  Council  at  535£  North  Spaulding 
Street,  Los  Angeles? 

"A.  You  are  asking  me  questions  which  infringe  upon  my  rights. 
Were  I  to  answer  these  questions  I  would  be  abusing  the  Bill  of  Rights, 
also  the  California  State  Constitution.  I  feel  that  you  do  not  have  the 
right  to  ask  these  questions.  I  feel  that  I  definitely  should  not  answer 
them.  Therefore,  I  decline  to  answer  on  the  grounds  previously  stated. 

"Q.  Is  it  not  a  fact  that  on  the  eighteenth  day  of  February,  1952, 
you  attended  a  meeting  of  the  Executive  Board  of  the  Medical  Board 
of  the  Arts,  Sciences  and  Professions  Council  at  830  North  Melrose 
Hill,  Los  Angeles? 

"A.  I  decline  to  answer  on  the  grounds  previously  stated. 


258  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

"Q.  Is  it  not  a  fact  that  on  the  fourteenth  day  of  March,  1952,  you 
attended  a  meeting  of  the  Medical  Division  of  the  Arts,  Sciences  and 
Professions  Council  at  7410  Sunset  Boulevard,  Los  Angeles? 

"A.  I  decline  to  answer  on  the  grounds  previously  stated. 

"Q.  Is  it  not  a  fact  that  on  the  sixteenth  day  of  May,  1952,  you  at- 
tended a  meeting  of  the  Executive  Board  of  the  Medical  Division  of  the 
Arts,  Sciences  and  Professions  Council,  at  7410  Sunset  Boulevard,  Los 
Angeles  ? 

"A.  Has  someone  stated  that  I  attended  this  meeting? 

"Q.  I  will  make  the  same  answer  I  gave  you  when  you  asked  the  same 
question  twice  before. 

' '  A.  Then  I  shall  give  you  the  same  answer :  I  decline  to  answer  on 
the  grounds  previously  stated. 

"Q.  Is  it  not  a  fact  that  on  the  fourteenth  day  of  June,  1952,  you  at- 
tended a  meeting  of  the  Arts,  Sciences  and  Professions  Equal  Eights 
Conference  held  at  the  Alexandria  Hotel,  Los  Angeles? 

"  A.  I  decline  to  answer  on  the  grounds  previously  stated. 

"Q.  Is  it  not  a  fact  that  on  the  seventh  day  of  July,  1952,  you  at- 
tended a  meeting  of  the  Executive  Board  of  the  Arts,  Sciences  and  Profes- 
sions Council,  Medical  Division,  at  830  North  Melrose  Hill,  Los  Angeles? 

"A.  It  was  stated  in  the  newspapers  that  this  committee  has  come  to 
Los  Angeles  at  this  time  at  the  request  of  the  county  medical  society.  I 
feel  that  this  committee  is  acting  as  a  trigger  mechanism  in  the  estab- 
lishment of  political  conformity  as  a  qualification  for  professional  com- 
petency and  in  the  practice  of  medicine.  Therefore,  I  decline  to  answer 
the  question  on  the  grounds  previously  stated. 

"Q.  Is  it  not  a  fact  that  on  October  31,  1952,  you  attended  a  meeting 
of  the  Medical  Division  of  the  Arts,  Sciences  and  Professions  Council  at 
7410  Sunset  Boulevard,  Los  Angeles  ? 

"A.  I  decline  to  answer  on  the  grounds  previously  stated. 

"  Q.  Is  it  not  a  fact  that  on  the  sixteenth  day  of  January,  1953,  you 
attended  a  meeting  of  the  Arts,  Sciences  and  Professions  Council,  Medi- 
cal Division  at  1407  South  St.  Andrews  Place,  Los  Angeles  ? 

"A.  I  will  not  in  any  way  support  this  committee  in  its  attempt  to 
smear  any  groups  or  any  witnesses  that  have  appeared  at  this  committee 
hearing,  or  whose  names  have  been  thrown  around.  Therefore,  I  decline 
to  answer  on  the  grounds  previously  stated. 

"Q.  This  is  the  next  to  the  last  one — and  this  is  the  other  one,  Coun- 
sel, that  I  mentioned  to  you  earlier — is  it  not  a  fact  that  on  the  twenty- 
fifth  day  of  June,  1954,  you  attended  a  meeting  of  the  Community 
Medical  Foundation  in  Los  Angeles  ? 

"Mr.  Omerberg :  Where  was  that  meeting  supposed  to  have  been  held, 
Counsel  ? 


UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES   IN    CALIFORNIA  259 

"Q.  (By  Mr.  Combs)  :  It  was  held,  according  to  my  information,  at 
the  office  of  the  foundation. 

"A.  Do  you  have  any  information  as  to  what  there  is  that  went  on 
there  that  was  illegal,  or  anything  that  you  could  help  me  with  ? 

"Q.  I  can  help  you  a  little,  maybe.  It  was  the  eighth  annual  meeting 
of  the  foundation. 

"A.  That  does  not  sound  very  illegal  to  me  anyway.  Low-cost  medical 
care  doesn't  and  an  inter-racial  medical  center  certainly  doesn't  sound 
illegal,  but  I  do  decline  to  answer  the  question  on  the  grounds  I  might 
incriminate  myself. 

"Q.  And  for  the  reasons  previously  stated? 

"A.  For  the  reasons  previously  stated  and  so  stipulated. 

' '  Chairman  Burns :  I  want  to  ask  the  witness  a  question.  She  stated 
in  her  answer  the  aims  and  purposes  of  this  organization  ? 

"The  Witness :  I  feel  what  I  have  just  stated  is  a  matter  of  common 
knowledge  and  has  certainly  been  publicized  in  the  papers  in  the  last 
few  days. 

' '  Chariman  Burns :  As  long  as  you  have  testified  regarding  the  aims 
and  purposes  of  this  organization,  the  chairman  instructs  you  to  answer 
the  question  exactly  as  it  was  propounded  to  you  by  Counsel.  Did  you 
attend  the  meeting  ? 

' '  The  Witness :  Could  I  hear  the  question  again  ? 

(Question  read.) 

"The  Witness:  I  believe  that  I  did  answer  that  question,  when  I 
answered  it  I  declined  to  answer  it.  Actually,  I  declined  to  answer  that 
question,  and  I  declined  on  the  grounds  previously  stated.  And  I  decline 
again  on  the  grounds  previously  stated,  if  that  will  help  the  record. 

"Q.  (By  Mr.  Combs)  :  Are  you  now  or  have  you  ever  been  a  member 
of  the  Communist  Party  or  the  Communist  Political  Association  ? 

"A.  I  decline  to  answer  that  question  on  the  grounds  previously  stated. 

"Mr.  Combs:  That  is  all. 

"Mr.  Omerberg:  Is  the  witness  excused? 

"Mr.  Combs:  Yes. 

"Mr.  Omerberg:  There  is  a  statement  here  by  Lee  Sutton  that  she 
would  like  to  have  filed  and  made  a  part  of  the  record.  It  is  one  page, 
with  one  line  on  the  second  page. 

1 '  Mr.  Combs :  Thank  you. ' ' 

STATEMENT  SUBMITTED  BY  LEE  SUTTON 
Committee  Exhibit  No.  18 

"The  Burns  Committee  states  that  it  is  appearing  in  Los  Angeles  at 
this  time  at  the  request  of  the  Los  Angeles  County  Medical  Society.  In 
view  of  this  I  believe  that  the  committee  is  acting  as  a  trigger  mecha- 


260  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

nism  in  the  establishment  of  political  conformity  as  a  qualification  for 
the  practice  of  medicine. 

"Although  the  Burns  Committee  states  that  it  is  here  to  investigate 
'subversive  activities'  in  the  medical  profession,  I  believe  that  the  com- 
mittee, itself,  is  engaging  in  activities  which  are  un-American  by  sup- 
porting and  implementing  attacks  upon  low-cost  medical  care,  and  those 
professional  and  non-professional  people  who  have  supported  this  type 
of  care. 

1 '  The  field  of  medicine,  as  well  as  all  scientific  fields,  can  flourish  only 
with  a  free  exchange  of  ideas,  even  though  these  ideas  may  appear  to 
be  of  a  minority  opinion. 

"We,  as  citizens,  must  also  live  in  an  atmosphere  of  free  exchange 
of  ideas.  The  committee  in  its  investigation  infringes  upon  this  atmos- 
phere. Therefor,  I  consider  it  my  duty  to  decline  to  answer  the  questions 
of  the  committee  by  claiming  the  privileges  guaranteed  to  me  by  the 
First  and  Fifth  Amendments  to  the  United  States  Constitution,  and 
Article  I,  Sections  9,  10,  and  13,  of  the  Constitution  of  the  State  of 
California. ' ' 

TESTIMONY  OF  DR.  MARVIN  SURE,  OPTOMETRIST 

' '  Chairman  Burns :  Give  your  name  and  address  to  the  reporter. 

"A.  My  name  is  Marvin  Sure,  7349  Pacific  View  Drive,  Los  Angeles. 

' '  Chairman  Burns :  Is  counsel  identified  for  the  record  ? 

"Mr.  Rykoff:  Richard  L.  Rykoff. 

"Q.   (By  Mr.  Combs)  :  Dr.  Sure,  are  you  a  doctor  of  optometry? 

"A.  Yes,  I  am. 

"Q.  Would  you  mind  telling  us  where  you  took  your  work? 

"A.  In  Chicago,  Illinois. 

"Q.  At  what  institution  ? 

"A.  The  Northern  Illinois  College  of  Optometry. 

"Q.  You  obtained  your  degree  in  what  year? 

"A.  1940,  I  believe. 

"Q.  That  is  close  enough.  How  long  have  you  practiced  your  profes- 
sion in  California  ? 

"A.  Since  1946,  when  I  got  out  of  the  Navy. 

"Q.  Did  you  hold  a  commission  in  the  Navy? 

"A.  Yes, "i  did. 

"Q.  What  was  that? 

"A.  My  rank  when  I  left  was  Lieutenant,  Junior  Grade. 

"Q.  You  practice  in  Glendale? 

"A.  Yes,  I  do. 

"Q.  Are  you  familiar  with  an  organization  known  as  the  Arts,  Sci- 
ences and  Professions  Council  of  Los  Angeles  f 


UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  261 

"A.  I  have  heard  testimony  given  and  I  have  seen  reports  in  the 
press  mentioning  the  Arts,  Sciences  and  Professions  Council  in  relation 
to  equal  rights  for  negro  professionals,  in  relation  to  low-cost  medical 
care  and  medical  care  for  working  people.  Since  the  committee  deems 
this  subversive,  I  find  I  must  decline  to  answer  the  question. 

"Q.  For  what  reasons? 

"A.  The  grounds  that  I  decline  to  answer  on  are  the  historic  pro- 
visions of  the  United  States  Constitution,  Amendments  one  and  five, 
which  state  that  I  need  not  give  testimony  that  may  be  used  against  me 
which  inquire  into  my  beliefs  and  associations;  also  the  provisions  of 
the  California  State  Constitution,  Article  I,  Sections  9  and  13 — all  of 
these  provisions  which  were  created  to  protect  innocent  people  against 
government  abuse. 

' '  Mr.  Combs :  Counsel,  would  you  be  willing  to  enter  into  a  stipula- 
tion, in  the  interest  of  saving  time,  that  in  the  event  your  client  declines 
to  answer  subsequent  questions,  that  his  refusal  may  be  deemed  to  have 
been  made  for  the  reasons  and  on  the  grounds  that  he  has  just  enumer- 
ated? 

"Mr.  Rykoff :  Yes.  We  will  stipulate  that  each  refusal  may  be  deemed 
to  incorporate  all  of  the  objections  given. 

"Mr.  Combs:  Thank  you  very  much.  Is  that  satisfactory  with  you? 

1 '  The  Witness :  Yes,  sir. 

"Mr.  Combs:  Would  you  be  willing  to  add  that  in  each  instance 
where  the  witness  refuses,  that  the  chairman  will  be  deemed  to  have 
ruled  that  the  grounds  are  insufficient  and  has  instructed  him  to  answer 
the  question? 

"Mr.  Rykoff:  Is  this  statement  to  be  that  every  time  the  question  is 
asked  the  chairman  will  be  deemed  to  have  instructed  him  ? 

"Mr.  Combs:  Yes. 

1 '  Chairman  Burns :  Every  time  the  answer  is  refused. 

"Mr.  Rykoff:  I  think  I  would  prefer  with  respect  to  any  specific 
questions,  where  the  chairman  feels  the  grounds  are  insufficient,  that 
he  so  indicate. 

"Mr.  Combs:  Very  well. 

"Q.  Is  it  not  a  fact,  Dr.  Sure,  that  you  are  and  have  been  for  four 
years  last  past  a  member  of  the  Medical  Division  of  the  Arts,  Sciences 
and  Professions  Council  of  Los  Angeles  ? 

"A.  It  seems  strange  to  me,  Mr.  Combs,  that  you  should  deem  sub- 
versive such  activities  as  have  been  mentioned,  such  as  low-cost  medical 
care,  low-cost  health  care 

"Chairman  Burns:  Just  a  moment,  Doctor.  You  are  not  entitled 
to  such  a  presumption  as  you  have  just  spoken  of.  We  have  not  stated 
that  we  consider  the  Arts,  Sciences  and  Professions  Council  subversive. 
That  is  your  idea.  We  have  made  no  such  statement  here. 


262  UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES  IX   CALIFORNIA 

"The  Witness:  On  any  free  forum,  in  a  free  market  place  of  ideas, 
I  would  be  willing  to  discuss  these  issues.  However,  I  don't  feel  that 
this  is  my  forum  or  a  free  forum.  Therefore,  I  decline  to  enter  into 
this  discussion  with  you  for  the  grounds  previously  stated. 

"Mr.  Combs:  I  don't  think  the  record  is  quite  clear. 

"Q.  Do  you  decline  to  answer  the  question  for  the  reasons  hereto- 
fore given? 

"A.  The  specific  question. 

''Mr.  Rykoff:  I  believe  there  was  only  that  one  question. 

"Mr.  Combs:  Yes. 

"Q.  Have  you  ever  been  affiliated  with  the  Civil  Rights  Congress  f 

"A.  In  the  conduct  of  these  hearings  I  feel  I  cannot  enter  into 
these  discussions  and  I  must  decline  to  answer  the  question  for  the 
grounds  previously  stated. 

"Q.  Is  it  not  a  fact  that  you  have  been  a  member  of  the  Executive 
Board  of  the  Medical  Division  of  the  Arts,  Sciences  and  Professions 
Council,  and  that  you  were  a  member  of  that  board  in  1951  and  1952  ? 

"A.  It  is  strange  in  these  times  that  such  innocuous  activities,  such 
as  you  mention,  should  be  deemed  to  be  subversive  by  you,  but  I  must 
decline  to  answer  for  the  grounds  previously  stated. 

"Q.  Are  you  acquainted  with  the  witness  who  proceded  you  on 
the  stand,  Lee  Sutton? 

"  A.  I  find  I  must  decline  to  answer  your  question,  sir,  in  the  context 
of  these  hearings,  for  the  grounds  previously  stated. 

"Q.  During  the  years  1951,  1952,  1953,  and  1954,  is  it  not  a  fact 
that  you  attended  approximately  31  meetings  of  the  Medical  Division 
of  the  Arts,  Sciences  and  Professions  Council  in  the  City  of  Los  An- 
geles ? 

"A.  Sir,  permit  me  to  express  to  you  how  strange  this  sounds  to 
me.  I  must,  of  course,  decline. 

' '  Q.  For  the  reasons  heretofore  given  ? 

' '  A.  Yes,  sir. 

"Q.  Are  you  now  or  have  you  ever  been  a  member  of  the  Communist 
Party  or  the  Communist  Political  Association? 

"A.  I  must  decline  to  answer  that  question  also,  sir. 

"Q.  For  the  reasons  heretofore  given? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Mr.  Combs:  That  is  all. 

' '  The  Witness :  Am  I  excused  ? 

"Chairman  Burns:  You  are  excused. 


UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  263 

STIPULATION  CONCERNING  DR.  JACOB  AGINS,  M.D. 

"Mr.  Combs:  Mr.  Chairman  and  Members  of  the  Committee:  a 
subpena  was  issued  for  Dr.  Jacob  Agins,  a  physician.  The  committee 
has  received,  or  the  chairman  has  received  some  documents  attesting 
to  the  fact  that  Dr.  Agins  has  a  serious  heart  condition  which  would 
undoubtedly  be  aggravated  by  the  necessity  of  his  being  present  on 
the  stand  and  being  subjected  to  the  strain  and  stress  of  testifying 
under  oath.  His  counsel  is  here  present  and  has  agreed  with  me  on  a 
stipulation,  a  stipulation  similar  to  the  ones  that  have  been  entered 
into  heretofore  during  this  hearing  for  the  accommodation  of  counsel 
for  other  witnesses.  It  is  as  follows :  Please  check  me. 

"That  if  Dr.  Agins  were  here  under  oath  and  testifying,  and  were 
asked  certain  questions  concerning  his  membership,  affiliation  or 
attendance  at  meetings  of  organizations  described  as  subversive  or 
Communist-dominated  by  official  federal  or  state  agencies,  that  he 
would  decline  to  answer  each  and  all  such  questions  upon  the  grounds 
that  will  now  be  stated  in  the  record  by  his  counsel,  who  has  already 
been  identified;  and  that  those  grounds  will  be  deemed  to  apply  to 
each  and  every  question  of  the  category  I  have  described  during  the 
course  of  his  interrogation.  Does  that  cover  it? 

"Mr.  Kykoff :  I  believe  that  covers  it,  Mr.  Combs. 

' '  Senator  Thompson :  Will  counsel's  questions  be  comparable  to  those 
you  have  asked  of  the  last  three  witnesses? 

' '  Mr.  Combs :  Yes,  Senator  Thompson,  they  would  be. 

"Mr.  Rykoff:  The  declination  would  be  based  upon  the  claim  that 
such  questions  as  have  been  described  are  an  inquiry  into  the  opinions, 
beliefs  and  associations  of  the  witness,  and  therefore  are  protected 
questions,  such  inquiry  being  against  the  First  Amendment  of  the 
United  States  Constitution  and  its  corollary  provisions,  the  State  Con- 
stitution, Article  I,  Sections  9  and  10,  and  that  the  answers  to  such 
questions  might  be  used  against  him  in  some  possible  way;  therefore, 
he  is  privileged  by  the  Fifth  Amendment  to  the  Constitution  of  the 
United  States  to  refuse  to  answer,  and  its  corollary  addition,  Article  I, 
Section  19,  of  the  State  Constitution. 

"Mr.  Combs:  So  stipulated.  The  first  question  would  be  concerning 
his  professional  and  educational  background.  This  material,  I  take  it, 
would  not  be  affected  by  the  stipulation. 

"Mr.  Rykoff:  No. 

"Mr.  Combs:  It  consists  of  the  clipped  portion  of  the  Los  Angeles 
County  Medical  Association  Journal  with  his  photograph  on  it.  Of  course, 
we  do  not  necessarily  claim  that  it  is  accurate. 

"Mr.  Rykoff:  I  understand. 

"Mr.  Combs:  But  this  is  what  appeared  in  the  1954  Medical  Journal: 
That  he  received  his  medical  degree  from  Wayne  University  in  1925, 


264  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

he  was  licensed  to  practice  in  California  in  1945,  his  address  is  1574 
Crossroads  of  the  World,  Los  Angeles  28. 

"The  next  question  would  be  whether  or  not  he  is  now  or  has  ever 
been  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party  or  the  Communist  Political 
Association.  According  to  the  stipulation  he  is  deemed  to  have 
declined  to  answer  the  question  for  the  reasons  heretofore  given. 

"Mr.  Rykoff :  That  is  correct. 

' '  Mr.  Combs :  The  next  question  would  be  whether  or  not  he  taught 
a  course  at  the  People's  Educational  Center,  which  has  been  described 
as  a  Communist  school  in  Los  Angeles,  in  the  spring  of  1947.  Pursuant 
to  the  stipulation  he  is  deemed  to  have  declined  to  answer  on  the 
grounds  heretofore  agreed  upon — not  agreed  upon,  but  mentioned  by 
his  counsel. 

"Mr.  Rykoff:  Yes,  sir. 

"Mr.  Combs:  The  next  question  would  be  whether  or  not  he  taught 
at  the  People's  Educational  Center  during  the  winter  term  of  1947. 
Pursuant  to  the  stipulation  he  is  deemed  to  have  refused  to  answer 
that  question  for  the  reasons  given  by  his  counsel. 

' '  The  last  question  would  be  whether  or  not  he  was  a  member  of  the 
Medical  Division  of  the  Arts,  Sciences  and  Professions  Council.  Pur- 
suant to  the  stipulation  he  is  deemed  to  have  refused  to  have  answered 
the  question  on  the  grounds  that  his  counsel  has  given  for  the  record. 
That  is  all. 

"Mr.  Rykoff:  All  right.  May  the  witness  be  deemed  to  be  excused. 

"Mr.  Combs:  The  witness  is  deemed  excused. 

TESTIMONY  OF  DR.  ONER  B.  BARKER,  JR. 

"Q.   (By  Mr.  Combs)  :  Your  name  is  Dr.  Oner  Barker,  Jr.? 

"A.  Yes,  sir. 

"Q.  You  spell  your  first  name  O-n-e-r? 

"A.  Correct. 

"Q.  Do  you  have  a  middle  initial? 

"A.  B. 

"Q.  What  is  your  residence  address,  Dr.  Barker? 

"A.  2254  West  25th  Street. 

"Q.  Are  you  a  physician  and  surgeon  licensed  to  practice  your  pro- 
fession in  the  State  of  California? 

"A.  Yes,  I  am. 

"Q.  Where  did  you  get  your  medical  degree,  Doctor? 

"A.  At  Howard  University  Medical  School. 

"Q.  In  what  year? 

"A.  1945. 

"Q.  You  have  practiced  your  profession  in  California  approximately 
how  long  ? 


UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  265 

"A.  Two  years. 

"Q.  Dr.  Barker,  you  appeared  before  the  House  Committee  on  Un- 
American  Activities  some  time  ago? 

"A.  Yes,  I  did. 

"  Q.  About  two  and  a  half  years  ago  ? 

"A.  Yes,  I  did. 

"Q.  You  appeared  there  pursuant  to  subpena? 

"A.  Yes,  I  did. 

' '  Q.  Were  you  asked  whether  or  not  you  were  then  or  had  ever  been 
a  member  of  the  Communist  Party? 

"A.  Yes,  I  was. 

"Q.  Do  you  recall  your  answer? 

"A.  Yes,  I  do. 

"Q.  What  was  it,  please? 

"A.  At  that  time  I  declined  to  answer. 

"Q.  You  declined  to  answer? 

"A.  Yes. 

1 '  Q.  Did  you  invoke  the  provisions  of  the  Fifth  Amendment  ? 

"A.  Yes,  I  did. 

"Q.  Did  you  do  that  on  advice  of  counsel? 

"A.  Yes,  I  did. 

"Q.  Did  the  name  of  your  counsel  appear  of  record  in  the  proceed- 
ings of  the  House  committee  ? 

"A.  I  believe  it  did. 

"Q.  What  was  the  name  of  your  counsel? 

"A.  Attorney  Thomas  Newsom. 

"Q.  Of  this  city? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  Dr.  Barker,  have  you  ever  been  a  member  of  the  Communist 
Party? 

"A.  Yes,  I  was. 

"Q.  When  did  you  become  a  member? 

"A.  In  the  early  part  of  1946,  I  believe. 

"Q.  Did  you  go  into  the  party  because  you  were  persuaded  to  do  so 
by  someone,  or  was  it  an  entirely  voluntary  action  on  your  part? 

"A.  I  felt  that  I  might  be  able,  I  felt  that  this  might  have  been  a 
medium  through  which  I  might  be  able  to  correct  some  of  the  things 
that  I  felt  were  not  exactly  right. 

"Q.  Social  inequalities,  injustices,  discrimination  and  other  things 
which  you  sincerely  wished  to  remedy  ? 

"A.  That  is  right. 

"Q.  You  thought  that  through  the  medium  of  an  organization  such 
as  the  Communist  Party  you  might  be  able  to  achieve  that  end  more 
readily  ? 


266  UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

"A.  Yes,  I  did. 

"Q.  That  was  the  basic  motivating  element  that  prompted  you  to 
affiliate  with  it? 
"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  Do  you  understand,  Doctor,  what  is  meant  by  the  term  'recruit' 
in  ordinary  Communist  parlance? 
"A.  Yes,  I  do. 
"  Q.  Were  you  recruited  ? 
' '  A.  Yes,  I  was. 

"  Q.  By  whom  were  you  recruited  ? 
' '  A.  Dr.  Alex  Riskin. 
"  Q.  Is  he  a  physician  ? 
"A.  Yes,  he  is. 

"Q.  After  you  were  recruited  and  joined  the  party  in  early  1946, 
were  you  assigned  to  a  specific  component  part  of  the  Communist  or- 
ganization in  Los  Angeles  ? 

"A.  It  was  the  doctors '  unit.  The  professional  unit. 
"  Q.  It  was  the  doctors '  unit  of  the  party  ? 
"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  About  how  many  members  comprised  that  unit  at  the  time  you 
were  assigned  to  it  ? 

"A.  I  really  don 't  recall  exactly  how  many  members  there  were. 
"Q.  Could  we  put  it  this  way,  Dr.  Barker.  I  understand  you  can  only 
approximate.  About  how  often  did  you  attend  meetings  of  that  particu- 
lar unit? 

"A.  During  the  time  I  was  in  the  party  I  must  have  attended  be- 
tween 10  and  15  meetings  all  told. 

;  Q.  What  was  the  average  attendance  at  those  meetings  ? 
:A.  I  would  imagine  about  10. 
;Q.  About  10? 
A.  Yes.     , 

Q.  All  of  them  were  doctors? 
A.  I  believe  they  were  all  doctors. 

Q.  Was  there  in  that  unit,  in  addition  to  yourself,  Alex  Riskin  ? 
!A.  Yes. 

:  Q.  Hyman  Engelberg  ? 
A.  Yes. 

Q.  He  was  a  physician  ? 
A.  Yes,  he  was. 
Q.  Or  he  is  a  physician. 
A.  Yes. 

Q.  Dr.  Harold  Koppleman  ? 
A.  Yes. 
Q.  Dr.  Milton  Z.  Lindon  ? 


UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  267 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  Dr.  Walter  Kempler  ? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  Dr.  Louise  Light  ? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  Dr.  Milton  Lester  ? 

"A.  Yes. 

' '  Q.  Dr.  Max  Schoen  ? 

"A.  Yes. 

"  Q.  Dr.  Murray  Abowitz  ? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  Dr.  Fred  Reynolds  ? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  Dr.  Thomas  L.  Perry? 

"A.  Yes. 

' '  Q.  Can  you  think  offhand  of  any  others  ? 

"A.  Offhand,  I  cannot. 

"  Q.  If  you  do  in  the  future  will  you  give  me  the  names  ? 

"A.  Yes. 

' '  Q.  The  meetings  were  held  at  residences  of  the  members  of  the  unit 
at  various  places  ? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  How  were  you  notified  that  a  meeting  was  to  be  held? 

' '  A.  Usually  by  telephone. 

"Q.  Was  there  an  organizer  in  charge  of  that  particular  unit? 

"A.  What  do  you  mean  by  'organizer'? 

"Q.  A  person  who  generally  directed  the  organizational  activities  of 
the  unit. 

"A.  Various  people  usually  directed  it. 

"Q.  You  paid  dues,  did  you  not? 

"A.  Well,  actually,  I  didn't  pay  any  dues. 

"Q.  You  did  not  pay  any  dues  at  all? 

' '  A.  No,  because  at  the  time  I  was  in  no  position  to  pay  dues. 

1 '  Q.  During  the  period  of  your  membership  in  the  Communist  Party, 
were  you  familiar  with  a  publication  known  as  Political  Affairs? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  That  was  the  publication  of  the  National  Committee  of  the  Com- 
munist Party  of  the  United  States,  was  it  not? 

"A.  I  believe  it  was,  yes. 

"Q.  That  was  discussed  from  time  to  time  during  your  unit  meet- 
ings? 

"A.  Yes,  it  was. 

' '  Q.  The  purpose  of  those  discussions  was  to  provide  correct  political 
orientation  for  the  membership? 


268  UN-AMEEICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN  CALIFOENIA 

"A.  Yes,  it  was. 

"Q.  The  membership  did  not  always  agree  on  the  direction  that  the 
orientation  usually  took,  did  it? 

"A.  No. 

"Q.  There  were  a  great  many  philosophical  and  political  discussions 
during  the  meetings? 

"A.  There  were. 

' '  Q.  But  once  a  decision  had  been  made  that  was  supposed  to  govern, 
is  that  right? 

"A.  It  was  supposed  to. 

"Q.  It  did  not  always? 

"A.  I  don 't  believe  it  did,  no. 

"Q.  Dr.  Barker,  tell  us,  if  you  have  any  ideas  of  it,  what  was  the 
real  reason  an  effort  was  made  to  recruit  you  into  this  particular  unit  ? 
Were  there  any  other  Negroes  in  the  unit  ? 

"A.  No. 

"Q.  There  were  no  Negroes  in  it  at  the  time  you  were  recruited? 

"A.  No. 

"Q.  Do  you  have  any  idea  why  the  effort  was  made  to  recruit  you 
into  that  unit? 

' '  A.  I  believe  so.  It  was  to  get  a  Negro  physician  into  the  unit. 

"Q.  For  their  own  propaganda  purposes? 

"A.  Probably  so. 

"Q.  You  did  not  even  pay  any  dues,  did  you? 

"A.  Well,  no,  I  didn't,  but  I 

"Q.  You  were  financially  unable  to  do  so? 

''A.  At  that  time  I  could  not. 

"Q.  You  went  on  the  staff  of  the  Community  Medical  Center  in  1946 
or  1947,  did  you  not? 

"A.  That  is  true. 

"Q.  Who,  if  anyone,  persuaded  you  to  do  that? 

''A.  Dr.  Riskin. 

"Q.  Dr.  Alex  Eiskin? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  He  is  the  same  person  who  recruited  you  into  the  Communist 
Party  to  begin  with? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  In  all  fairness  I  would  like  to  have  you  testify,  if  you  can,  of 
course,  that  there  were  many  very  sincere  people  at  the  Community 
Medical  Center  while  you  were  there  who  were  not  members  of  the 
Communist  Party. 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  That  is  true,  isn't  it? 

"A.  That  is  true. 


UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  269 

"Q.  Are  you  acquainted  with  Mr.  Kenneth  Hartford? 

"A.  Yes,  I  am. 

"Q.  Was  the  administrator  of  the  Community  Medical  Center  during 
the  time  you  were  attached  to  its  staff?  As  a  matter  of  fact,  you  are 
still  attached  to  the  staff,  are  you  not  ? 

"A.  I  have  left  the  staff. 

"Q.  Oh,  you  have? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  How  long  ago? 

"A.  As  of  two  days  ago. 

"Q.  But  while  you  were  there  you  knew  Ken  Hartford? 

"A.  Yes. 

' '  Q.  Was  he  a  medical  man  ? 

"A.  No. 

"Q.  He  had  no  medical  training? 

"A.  No.  As  far  as  I  know  he  didn't. 

"Q.  He  was  the  administrator  of  the  institution? 

"A.  He  was  the  business  administrator. 

"Q.  Was  he  in  your  opinion  an  efficient  administrator? 

''A.  This  is  sort  of  difficult  for  me  to  say.  I  had  very  little  to  do 
with  the  business  of  the  running  of  the  center. 

"Q.  Your  contact  then  was  professional? 

"A.  That  is  right. 

"Q.  Medical  rather  than  business? 

"A.  That  is  right. 

"Q.  Are  you  familiar  with  a  publication  known  as  the  Daily  People's 
World? 

"A.  Yes.  I  am. 

"'Q.  Is  that  the  publication  which  carries  the  party  line  of  the  Com- 
munist Party  in  this  area? 

"A.  I  believe  it  is. 

' '  Q.  Did  you  understand,  while  you  were  a  member  of  the  Commu- 
nist Party,  that  it  was  one  of  the  publications  the  party  urged  its  mem- 
bers to  take  and  read? 
A.  Yes. 

'Q.  There  is  no  mistake  about  that,  is  there? 
A.  No. 

Q.  Did  you  see  copies  of  that  publication,  from  time  to  time,  at 
the  Community  Medical  Center? 
A.  Occasionally  I  did. 

Q.  Are  you  now  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party? 
A.  No,  I  am  not. 

'Q.  How  long  has  it  been  since  you  left  the  party? 


270  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

"A.  Since  1947. 

"Q.  Would  you  describe  for  the  committee,  please,  the  reasons  for 
your  disillusionment  and  disaffiliation  ? 

"A.  I  felt  that  there  were  so  many  inconsistencies  with  what  I  had 
believed  originally  and  what  actually  happened  subsequently,  that  I  no 
longer  felt  it  was  carrying  out  what  I  had  hoped  or  what  I  had 
thought  it  would. 

"  Q.  It  simply  did  not  provide  the  medium  that  you  had  anticipated  ? 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  You  became  disillusioned  and  left? 

"A.  That  is  right. 

"Q.  At  that  point  did  you  go  and  tell  anybody  that  you  were  about 
to  leave  the  party,  or  did  you  simply  become  inactive  and  drift  away 
from  it? 

"A.  That  is  right. 

' '  Q.  You  never  attended  any  more  meetings  ? 

"A.  No,  I  never  attended  any  more  meetings. 

"Q.  You  never  had  any  more  contacts  with  any  party  people? 

"A.  That  is  right. 

"Q.  Were  you  subject  to  any  campaign  of  vilification  or  abuse  after 
you  became  inactive? 

"A.  No. 

"Q.  None,  whatever? 

"A.  No. 

"Q.  Have  you  ever  been  connected  with  any  other  clinics  besides 
the  Community  Medical  Center? 

"A.  No  more  than  the  clinics  at  the  General  Hospital. 

"Q.  The  clinics  at  the  General  Hospital? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  Would  you  or  could  you  not  say  that  the  Community  Medical 
Center  was  unique  in  having  a  high  incidence  of  Communist  Party 
members  on  its  staff? 

"A.  Unique  in  the  sense  of  other  clinics? 

"Q.  Yes,  as  compared  to  other  clinics. 

"A.  Yes,  I  would  think  so — if  these  people  are  still  members  of 
the  Communist  Party. 

"Q.  You  don't  know  of  your  own  knowledge  whether  they  are  still 
in  the  party  ? 

"A.  That  is  right. 

"Q.  But  they  were  when  you  were  a  member? 

"A.  At  that  time,  yes. 

"Q.  Dr.  Barker,  do  you  have  anything  else  to  contribute? 

"A.  No. 


UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  271 

' '  Mr.  Combs :  I  might  say,  and  I  am  sure  I  express  the  sentiments  of 
the  committee,  that  we  are  most  grateful  to  you  for  your  testimony 
this  morning;  for  your  courage,  your  forthrightness  in  giving  us  this 
information,  which,  of  course,  is  the  only  way  we  can  get  it.  For  myself, 
speaking  from  some  little  experience,  not  in  the  party,  but  because 
I  have  had  contacts  with  a  good  many  former  members  of  the  party, 
I  express  to  you  my  individual  appreciation,  because  I  know  it  is  a 
psychological  wrench  to  take  this  step.  We  do  appreciate  it.  I  thank 
you  very  much.  Does  the  committee  have  any  questions? 

"Chairman  Burns:  No.  Thank  you  very  much,  Doctor. 

TESTIMONY  OF  DR.  LOUISE  LIGHT,  OSTEOPATHIC 
PHYSICIAN  AND  SURGEON 

"Q.   (By  Mr.  Combs)  :  Your  professional  name  is  Dr.  Louise  Light? 

"A.  That  is  right. 

"Q.  What  is  your  profession? 

"A.  I  am  an  osteopathic  physician  and  surgeon. 

' '  Q.  Where  did  you  get  your  degree  ? 

"A.  In  California,  at  the  College  of  Osteopathic  Physicians  and  Sur- 
geons in  Los  Angeles. 

"Q.  What  year? 

"A.  1938. 

"Q.  Since  1938,  have  you  practiced  your  profession  in  this  area? 

"  A.  I  interned  at  the  county  hospital  first  for  about  a  year,  and  then 
started  the  practice  of  medicine  at  the  end  of  1939. 

"Q.  At  the  Los  Angeles  General  Hospital? 

"A.  That  is  right. 

' '  Q.  Are  you  married  ? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  What  is  your  husband's  name? 

"A.  Max  Silver. 

' '  Q.  You  were  married  in  or  about  1942  ? 

"A.  Yes,  sir. 

"Q.  Dr.  Light,  you  were  subpenaed  to  appear  here,  were  you  not? 

"A.  Yes,  I  was. 

' '  Mr.  Combs :  For  the  record  I  might  add  that  the  preceding  witness 
was  also  here  under  subpena. 

"Q.  Have  you  ever  testified  before  this  occasion  under  subpena 
issued  by  any  committee  on  un-American  activities? 

"A.  Yes.  I  testified  in  January  of  1952  in  Washington. 

"Q.  Before  the  House  Committee  on  Un-American  Activities? 

"A.  That  is  right. 

' '  Q.  That  was  in  Washington  ? 


272  UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

"A.  That  was  in  Washington. 

"Q.  You  have  never  testified  before  any  agency  here? 

"A.  No. 

"Q.  Since  that  time  have  you  reflected  upon  your  experiences?  You 
had  a  conference  with  me  concerning  your  testimony,  did  you  not? 

"A.  Yes,  I  did. 

"  Q.  At  the  time  you  testified  in  Washington  were  you  asked  whether 
or  not  you  had  ever  been  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party  ? 

"A.  Yes,  I  was  asked. 

' '  Q.  Did  you  answer  in  the  affirmative  ? 

"A.  I  did. 

"Q.  Dr.  Light,  when  did  you  affiliate  with  the  Communist  Party? 

"A.  At  the  end  of  1939. 

"Q.  Where  were  you  when  you  made  that  affiliation? 

"A.  In  Los  Angeles. 

"Q.  Did  you  join  the  party  by  applying  for  membership,  or  were  you 
recruited  into  it  ? 

' '  A.  No.  I  applied  for  membership  in  the  party. 

' !  Q.  How  did  you  happen  to  make  that  application  ?  What  were  your 
motives  in  general? 

"A.  Well,  it  is  a  sort  of  a  long  story.  Briefly,  I  felt  there  were  a  lot 
of  inequalities  in  the  city,  in  the  country  and  in  the  world  in  general. 
At  that  time  the  Communist  Party  seemed  to  be  the  only  one  that  was 
offering  some  form  of  activity  to  help  solve  some  of  these  problems.  For 
a,  number  of  years  I  had  been  interested  in  it.  When  I  got  through  with 
the  County  Hospital  interneship,  I  had  some  time  to  think  about  it  and 
some  time  for  work  as  far  as  social  activities  were  concerned.  I  then 
applied  for  membership  to  the  Communist  Party. 

"  Q.  To  whom  did  you  apply  ? 

"A.  I  first  talked  to  a  lawyer  friend  of  ours  whom  I  knew  was  a 
member  of  the  party,  and  asked  how  I  should  go  about  gaining  admis- 
sion to  the  party.  I  told  him  I  would  be  particularly  interested  in 
working  with  other  doctors  who  might  be  interested  in  the  Communist 
Party.  He  referred  me  to  someone  to  help  fill  the  application  out. 

"Q.  Was  that  someone  Dr.  Leo  Bigelman? 

' '  A.  Yes,  it  was. 

1 '  Q.  Did  he  help  you  fill  the  application  out  ? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  Pursuant  to  your  request,  were  you  thereafter  assigned  to  a 
branch  of  the  party? 

"A.  Yes,  I  was. 

"Q.  What  branch  was  that? 

"A.  I  was  assigned  to  the  medical  branch. 


UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  273 

"Q.  Medical  branch? 

"A.  Of  the  Communist  Party. 

"Q.  The  membership  of  which  was  comprised  of  people  who  were 
active  in  the  field  of  medicine  ? 

"A.  That  is  right. 

"Q.  Not  necessarily  M.D.  's  ? 

''A.  Not  necessarily  doctors,  no.  There  were  optometrists,  doctors, 
some  nurses  and  dentists. 

"Q.  Was  that  branch  a  subdivision  of  a  higher  unit  of  the  party? 

"A.  Yes,  it  was. 

"  Q.  Was  it  a  section  ? 

"A.  It  was  a  section  of  a  professional — it  was  actually  a  branch  of 
a  professional  section. 

"Q.  In  the  Communist  Party  of  Los  Angeles? 

"A.  That  is  right. 

"Q.  Is  it  not  a  fact  that  the  professional  section  was  comprised  not 
only  of  medical  people  and  people  interested  in  the  practice  of  medi- 
cine, such  as  yourself,  but  also  of  other  professional  people,  such  as 
lawyers  ? 

"A.  Yes,  and  teachers. 

"Q.  Teachers? 

"A.  I  think  so. 

"Q.  Social  workers? 

"A.  I  think  so. 

"Q.  Were  they  organized  in  branches,  the  lawyers  branch,  the 
teachers  branch,  the  social  workers  branch,  and  so  on? 

"A.  That  is  right. 

"Q.  You  were  simply  affiliated  with  the  medical  branch? 

"A.  That  is  right. 

"Q.  About  how  often  did  your  branch  meet? 

"A.  The  meetings  averaged  about  once  a  week. 

"Q.  Did  they  meet  in  a  central  place  regularly,  or  shift  from  place 
to  place? 

"A.  We  shifted  from  place  to  place,  from  one  man's  home  to  another 
man's  home. 

"Q.  How  were  you  notified  that  a  meeting  was  to  be  held? 

"A.  There  were  various  ways.  Sometimes  we  decided  on  the  evening 
of  the  meeting  where  we  would  have  the  next  meeting.  At  other  times 
there  would  be  telephone  conversations.  That  would  be  about  it. 

"Q.  Generally,  what  did  you  discuss  at  the  meetings?  I  don't  mean 
in  detail,  but  briefly  and  generally  what  kind  of  meetings  wore  they? 

"A.  We  discussed  current  events.  We  would  discuss  party  activities 
in  general,  and  maybe  party  activities  in  terms  of  the  medical  profes- 


274  UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES  IN  CALIFORNIA 

sion  itself.  We  would  discuss  finances  and  how  to  raise  money  enough 
to  contribute  to  the  Communist  Party.  We  would  perhaps  have  a  dis- 
cussion on  some  article,  or  book,  or  literature  that  had  to  do  with  Com- 
munist Party  activities. 

"Q.  Did  you  determine  what  direct  action  you  would  take  as  mem- 
bers of  the  medical  profession  and  members  of  the  medical  branch 
of  the  professional  section  of  the  party  in  recruiting  other  people  into 
the  organization  and  in  raising  issues  that  would  be  suitable  for  the 
party  purposes  and  in  discussing  the  political  orientation  that  your 
particular  unit  should  take? 

"A.  Yes,  we  did.  We  would  discuss  recruiting  the  members,  various 
ways  that  were  suggested  to  recruit  members,  by  personal  contact  or 
by  gatherings,  inviting  outsiders  who  might  be  interested.  We  would 
discuss  things  that  the  medical  branch  could  or  should  be  doing.  There 
were  a  number  of  discussions  on  how  much  money  a  doctor  should  give 
to  the  Communist  Party.  Generally,  it  was  expected  that  about  4  per- 
cent of  a  doctor's  income  should  be  contributed  to  the  party,  but  of 
course,  nobody  had  access  to  the  books. 

"Q.  So  actually,  you  never  knew  how  much  money  was  collected? 

"A.  No. 

"Q.  Who  collected  the  money? 

"A.  That  would  depend  on  the  time  of  the  year  or  the  political 
situation.  There  were  times  when  I  collected  the  money,  and  other 
times  we  had  a  dues  or  financial  secretary  who  collected  the  money. 

"Q.  Dr.  Light,  I  want  to  deviate  from  the  routine  that  I  had  planned 
in  questioning  you  a  little  bit,  because  I  have  come  into  possession  this 
morning  of  something — I  don't  know  whether  you  have  ever  seen  it 
before  or  not — it  is  entitled,  'For  Use  of  Strike  Welfare  Committees 
Only.  Insert  this  supplement  in  your  kit,  List  of  doctors  and  dentists 
cooperating  with  the  Progressive  Workers  for  Free  Care  for  Strikers. ' 

"It  has  already  been  identified  and  authenticated  in  the  files  of  the 
committee. 

"Would  you  please  examine  it  and  tell  me  whether  or  not  you  are 
familiar  with  that  document? 

"A.  I  have  never  seen  this  document. 

"Q.  You  have  never  seen  this  document  before? 

"A.  No.  I  do  know  one  of  the  things  we  were  discussing  and  had 
done  was  to  give  free  medical  services  to  the  families  of  strikers  when 
it  was  necessary,  but  I  am  not  familiar  with  this  document. 

"Q.  That  was  one  of  the  obligations  of  your  branch? 

"A.  I  would  say  it  was  one  of  our  activities. 

"Q.  Did  you  give  free  medical  service  to  families  of  strikers? 

"A.  Yes. 


UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  275 

"Q.  On  this  list  is  the  name  of  Dr.  Max  Schoen,  doctor  of  dental 
surgery,  314  North  Harper  Street,  Los  Angeles.  Did  you  know 
Dr.  Schoen? 

"A.  Yes,  I  knew  Dr.  Schoen. 

' '  Q.  Did  you  know  him  as  a  Communist  ? 

"A.  I  knew  him  as  a  Communist.  He  was  a  member  of  my  branch. 
I  also  knew  him  as  a  delegate  who  was  sent  to  my  house  at  one  time 
with  a  lawyer  to  tell  me  how  to  run  my  office.  I  would  like  that  for 
the  record.  I  don't  know  whether  it  should  be  put  in  the  record  now 
or  later  on. 

"Q.  I  think  we  will  come  to  it  later  on  if  you  don't  mind. 

"A.  AU  right. 

1 '  Q.  This  is  really  sort  of  breaking  the  continuity  of  what  I  wanted 
to  ask  you,  but  I  would  like  to  cover  the  names  here.  Dr.  Alex  E.  Pennes, 
6333  Wilshire  Boulevard,  Los  Angeles.  "Were  you  acquainted  with 
Dr.  Alex  E.  Pennes? 

"A.  Yes,  I  was. 

"Q.  Did  you  know  him  to  be  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party? 

"A.  I  did. 

' '  Q.  Was  he  affiliated  with  your  branch  ? 

"A.  He  was. 

"Q.  You  also  note  the  name  of  Dr.  Joseph  Hittelman,  132  North  Soto 
Street,  Los  Angeles.  Did  you  know  Dr.  Hittelman  ? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  Did  you  know  him  as  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party? 

"A.  I  did. 

' '  Q.  And  as  a  member  of  your  medical  branch  ? 

"A.  That  is  right. 

"Q.  I  also  notice  the  name  of  Dr.  Morris  Feder,  2202  Brooklyn 
Street,  Los  Angeles.  Did  you  know  Dr.  Feder  ? 

"A.  I  did. 

"  Q.  As  a  Communist  Party  member  ? 

"A.  Yes. 

1 '  Q.  And  a  member  of  your  branch  ? 

"A.  That  is  right. 

"Q.  Getting  back  to  the  continuity  of  the  interrogation,  Dr.  Light, 
did  you  ever  hold  any  official  position  in  your  medical  branch  ? 

"A.  Yes,  I  did. 

"  Q.  What  was  that  position  ? 

"A.  I  was  what  was  known  for  a  time  as  the  party  organizer  of  that 
branch. 

' '  Q.  Would  you  explain  what  the  duties  of  a  party  organizer  are  ? 

"A.  At  the  time  I  was  party  organizer  I  was  getting  the  meetings 
together  and  collecting  the  dues  and  attending  the  various  section 


276  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

meetings  that  occurred,  and  going  to  the  county  section  meetings,  the 
open  meetings  where  the  general  party  membership  and  the  leaders  of 
the  party  would  get  together  to  discuss  problems.  That  is  enough. 

"  Q.  Those  were  your  duties  ? 

"A.  Yes. 

' '  Q.  You  ran  the  branch,  didn  't  you  ? 

"A.  At  that  time  things  were  a  little  bit  tight.  Some  of  the  doctors 
did  not  have  time  to  do  anything  in  terms  of  working  with  the  branch, 
and  others  were  a  little  afraid  they  might  be  seen  or  connected  with  the 
party  in  terms  of  outside  activity.  I  had  the  time  and  I  was  terribly 
enthusiastic  and  terribly  eager. 

' '  Q.  Did  you  spend  a  lot  of  time  at  your  work  ? 

"A.  I  did. 

"  Q.  You  gave  it  a  lot  of  enthusiasm  ? 

' '  A.  I  really  did. 

' '  Q.  Do  you  think  you  were  successful  ? 

"A.I  don 't  know. 

"Q.  During  what  period  of  time  were  you  acting  as  organizer  for 
that  branch? 

"A.  I  think  from  about  the  beginning  of  1939 — no,  1940,  to  about 
1942  or  1943.  I  am  not  sure  of  the  exact  time  element  there. 

"Q.  Was  there  a  period  during  your  membership  in  the  party,  and 
your  affiliation  with  that  particular  branch  and  section,  that  the  branch 
was  criticized  from  a  higher  Communist  source  because  it  was  not 
active  enough  ? 

"A.  Yes.  There  was  a  time  when  that  happened. 

' '  Q.  Do  you  remember  that  incident  ? 

' '  A.  There  was  one  incident  I  remember,  that  was  sometime,  I  think, 
in  1944.  Maybe  it  was  late  1944.  I  am  not  sure  of  the  date.  We  were 
told  at  one  of  our  meetings  at  the  party  center — 

' '  Q.  What  do  you  mean  by  '  party  center '  ? 

' '  A.  The  hierarchy  in  Los  Angeles  of  the  Communist  Party. 

"Q.  The  leadership? 

"A.  Yes,  the  leadership.  That  they  were  disturbed  and  unhappy 
about  the  lack  of  activity  of  the  doctors'  group.  We  were  to  have  de- 
cided and  discussed  the  problem  in  order  to  find  something  the  doctors 
could  do  to  make  themselves  useful  to  the  party.  One  of  the  comrades 
got  up  very  energetically  and  said,  'Comrades,  I  think  we  have  an 
issue.  We  have  got  an  issue.  Let's  take  the  issue  of  the  Negro  people 
in  the  hospitals.  I  think  we  can  make  something  out  of  that. ' 

' '  Q.  Was  that  advice  followed  ? 

' '  A.  Yes,  I  think  it  was  after  a  while. 

' '  Q.  Did  the  party  create  an  issue  over  that  problem  ? 


UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  277 

"A.  Well,  they  tried  to  create  an  issue  over  the  problem — not  that 
there  is  no  problem.  I  want  to  stand  on  the  record  that  there  is  definitely 
a  problem  of  Negroes  in  the  private  hospitals.  That  was  one  of  the 
reasons  I  got  into  the  party  in  the  first  place,  because  I  felt  they  might 
solve  that  problem,  but  I  did  not  expect  it  to  be  used  as  a  propaganda 
method. 

"Q.  Which  it  was? 
■  ■  A.  Yes,  and  that  disgusted  me. 

"Q.  Were  you  here  during  the  testimony  of  the  witness  who  pre- 
ceded you,  Dr.  Barker  ? 
"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  Did  his  testimony  fit  in  with  your  experience  in  connection  with 
this  particular  incident? 
"A.  I  think  so. 

"Q.  Do  you  remember  the  name  of  the  doctor  who  said  he  had 
thought  of  an  issue? 
"A.  Yes,  I  do. 
' '  Q.  What  was  his  name  ? 
"A.  Dr.  Murray  Abowitz. 

"Q.  Did  that  occur  in  a  regular  closed  meeting? 
"A.  It  was  in  the  home  meeting  of  one  of  the  doctors. 
"Q.  It  was  a  Communist  meeting? 
"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  While  you  were  a  member  of  the  party,  Dr.  Light,  was  it  not 
a  part  of  the  policy  for  the  party  to  criticize  the  discharge  of  people 
who  were  party  members  or  sympathetic  toward  party  activities,  and 
to  exert  every  effort  to  keep  them  employed,  working,  and  active? 

"A.  Do  you  mean  that  the  party  was  interested  in  keeping  their  own 
people  at  work? 
[Q.  Yes. 

A.  Oh,  but  definitely. 

Q.  Did  you  ever  have  a  secretary  who  was  employed  by  you  who 
was  formerly  affiliated  with  the  Communist  Party? 
;A.  Yes,  I  did. 
Q.  A  woman? 
A.  Yes. 

Q.  You  knew  that  she  had  been  a  party  member  ? 
A.  Sure.  We  were  in  the  party  at  the  same  time. 
Q.  At  the  same  time? 
A.  Yes. 

Q.  At  the  time  you  employed  her  were  you  in  the  party? 
A.  I  was  on  the  tail  end  of  being  out.  I  was  already  losing  a  lot  of 
interest,  but  she  had  already  left. 


278  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

"Q.  Left  the  party? 

"A.  The  party. 

"Q.  "Will  you  describe  for  us  what  happended  between  you  and  the 
Communist  Party  by  reason  of  the  fact  that  you  had  in  your  employ 
a  former  party  member  ? 

"A.  This  was  a  very  interesting  thing.  This  girl  was  in  my  office 
about  two  weeks  as  my  employee  when  I  was  visited  by  a  delegation, 
one  was  Dr.  Max  Schoen,  whom  you  mentioned  before.  He  came  in  with 
one  of  the  lawyers  from  the  lawyers'  branch. 

' '  Q.  Who  was  that  ? 

' '  A.  Kaplan,  I  think  his  name  was. 

"  Q.  A  party  member  ? 

"A.  Yes.  This  was  a  party  delegation  from  the  professional  section — 
to  tell  me  to  immediately  discharge  the  girl  I  had  in  the  office  because 
she  was  not  a  party  member,  that  she  had  been  and  had  left  and  that 
she  was  now  considered  a  Fascist  and  Trotskyite,  and  I  was  to  sum- 
marily throw  her  out. 

"Q.  This  was  regardless  of  her  ability  or  your  desire  to  have  her 
work  for  you,  or  her  own  desire  to  continue  in  your  employ  ? 

"A.  That  had  nothing  to  do  with  it.  I  was  told  she  was  not  to  be 
employed  in  my  office,  that  she  was  a  dangerous  character,  and  as  such, 
should  be  immediately  thrown  out. 

' '  Q.  What  was  your  response  ? 

"A.  It  would  not  look  good  in  the  record,  but  the  general  feeling  was, 
I  told  them  I  was  still  living  in  the  United  States,  I  still  had  a  right  to 
run  my  office  my  way,  and,  God  damn  it,  nobody  could  tell  me  how  to 
run  it. 

"Q.  Did  the  employee  continue  working? 

"A.  For  three  years. 

"Q.  Were  any  further  attempts  made  to  harass  you  in  that  regard? 

"A.  Yes,  there  were  a  number  of  times,  telephone  calls  and  requests 
for  meetings  with  various  people.  I  did  concede  to  one  meeting  at  that 
time  with  the  organizer  of  the  branch,  which  was  around  1947,  I  guess. 

"  Q.  Who  was  the  organizer  of  the  branch  at  that  time  ? 

"A.  Tom  Perry  at  that  time. 

"Q.  Dr.  Thomas  L.  Perry? 

"A.  That  is  right. 

"Q.  In  1947  or  thereabouts? 

"A.  Thereabouts.  I  don't  remember  the  dates  because  at  that  time 
they  did  not  seem  important  enough  to  remember. 

"Q.  You  had  been  organizer  and  he  came  along  afterwards? 

"A.  No.  There  were  others  between  myself  and  Dr.  Perry. 

"Q.  I  see. 


UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  279 

"A.  But  at  that  time  Dr.  Perry  was  the  president  or  group  organ- 
izer, or  whatever  you  call  them.  I  did  have  a  meeting  with  him.  He 
wanted  me  to  get  reactivated  again.  I  told  him  I  was  not  interested  in 
the  whole  business. 

"Q.  He  tried  to  get  you  back  into  the  party  activity? 

"A.  That  is  right. 

"Q.  Where  did  that  conference  take  place? 

"A.  That  took  place  in  an  office  on  Fairfax,  at  the  office  of  one  of 
our  comrades.  There  was  one  other  attempt  that  I  think  might  be  inter- 
esting for  the  record.  I  received  a  telephone  call  from  a  woman  named 
Rose  Chernin,  whom  I  had  never  known,  talked  with  her,  seen  her, 
heard  of  her,  as  a  matter  of  fact.  She  called  me  on  the  telephone  through 
my  exchange  and  wanted  to  make  an  appointment.  When  I  wanted 
to  know  what  the  problem  was,  to  know  how  much  time  to  allow  in  the 
office,  she  said,  'Well,  this  is  not  a  medical  problem.  WTe  have  some 
things  to  talk  over. ' 

"I  said,  'What  things  do  you  have  in  mind?'  She  hemmed  and 
hawed.  It  finally  dawned  on  me  that  it  was  a  party  thing  that  she 
wanted  to  talk  over. 

"I  said,  'It  takes  two  people  to  discuss  a  problem  and  I  have  no 
problems  to  discuss.  Therefore,  we  couldn't  have  a  meeting.' 

' '  She  proceeded  to  threaten  me  on  the  telephone,  '  Now,  look,  it  would 
be  much  better  with  you  if  you  did  meet  with  us. ' 

"So  I  told  her  that  this  was  still  the  United  States,  that  I  would 
report  it  to  the  police  department  if  she  did  not  stop  annoying  me, 
and  hung  up  the  receiver. 

"Q.  Did  she  stop  annoying  you? 

"A.  That  was  the  last  bit  of  annoyance  from  that  particular  source. 

"Q.  Do  you  recall  a  turn  that  was  effected  in  the  Communist  Party 
in  the  United  States  by  reason  of  the  publication  of  a  letter  in  France  ? 

"A.  I  sure  do.  That  was  the  Duclos  letter  in  the  spring  of  1945. 

"Q.  In  the  spring  of  1945? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  Who  was  Duclos? 

"A.  Jacques  Duclos  was  a  French  party  member  and  a  very  high 
party  member  in  France,  who  had  apparently  gone  to  a  meeting  in 
the  Soviet  Union.  When  he  came  back  from  the  Soviet  Union  to  France 
he  proceeded  to  write  a  document  excoriating  the  American  Communist 
Party  on  what  are  called  deviation  tactics,  that  they  were  too  friendly 
with  the  capitalist  government,  that  they  misunderstood  the  whole  role 
of  the  Communist  Party. 

"Q.  That  letter  criticized  Earl  Browder,  the  then  leader? 


280  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN  CALIFORNIA 

"A.  It  criticized  Earl  Browder,  the  then  leader,  to  the  extent  that 
there  was  a  tremendous  upheaval  in  the  party,  and,  following  several 
meetings  and  conventions,  Earl  Browder  was  kicked  out. 

"Q.  He  had  been  head  of  the  party  for  14  years,  hadn't  he? 

' '  A.  Yes.  A  good  many  of  us  who  had  gotten  into  the  party  felt  that 
it  was  run  in  an  American  way  to  improve  American  conditions  for 
American  people.  When  this  happened  it  rather  upset  quite  a  few  of 
us.  We  got  the  feeling  that  all  this  was  so  much  malarky,  would  you 
say;  that  they  were  interested  in  building  a  party  to  help  build  the 
Soviet  Union.  So  he  had  to  take  a  back  seat. 

"Q.  Is  it  not  a  fact,  Dr.  Light,  that  immediately  after  the  appear- 
ance of  the  Duclos  letter  which,  as  I  understand  it — please  correct  me 
if  I  am  wrong — it  was  not  in  the  United  States  but  was  in  a  Commu- 
nist publication  in  France  ? 

"A.  That  is  right. 

"Q.  And  that  the  entire  Communist  Party  of  the  United  States  im- 
mediately reacted  and  practically  turned  itself  inside  out? 

"A.  It  did. 

"Q.  Which,  of  course,  was  a  graphic  example  of  the  dictatorial  ap- 
proach ? 

"A.  It  was  one  of  the  things  that  came  to  mind  at  that  time.  That 
actually  this  was  a  party  not  run  by  the  American  people,  but  actually 
dictated  to  by  the  Soviet  Union  by  way  of  the  French  Communist  Party 
at  that  time. 

"Q.  Did  the  Duclos  letter  and  the  incidents  which  followed  result 
in  the  disillusionment  of  great  numbers  of  Communists? 

"A.  Over  a  period  of  several  years  I  would  say,  yes,  a  tremendous 
number.  You  don't  suddenly  become  disillusioned  with  somebody  you 
are  in  love  with.  It  takes  a  little  time — one  thing  after  another,  and 
then  you  find  out  you  made  a  mistake. 

"Q.  And  sometimes  the  period  preceding  membership  in  the  party 
takes  quite  a  little  time  ? 

"A.  That  is  also  true. 

"Q.  It  is  not  a  matter  of  walking  down  and  jumping  in  and  jumping 
out  again. 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  I  would  assume,  and  you  of  course  know  and  I  don't,  that  it 
would  be  much  easier  to  get  in  than  it  would  be  to  get  out? 

"A.  Generally  speaking,  yes;  I  would  say  that  is  correct.  It  isn't 
very  easy  to  get  out. 

"Q.  This  is  supposition — I  was  about  to  remark,  you  have  been  in 
the  party,  and  you  have  been  out  of  it  for  a  long  time,  but  I  would 
assume  since  you  left  the  party  it  has  been  increasingly  difficult  to 
get  in. 


UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN  CALIFORNIA  281 

"A.  Yes.  They  have  been  a  little  bit  more  careful. 

"Q.  When  did  your  disillusionment  and  period  of  inactivity  in  the 
party  commence  ?  Excuse  me,  I  have  one  other  matter  to  take  up  before 
that. 

"What  was  the  peculiar  usefulness  of  the  medical  profession  to  the 
Communist  Party?  Why  were  they  particularly  desired  as  members 
to  the  extent  that  another  branch  of  the  party  was  composed  of  medical 
personnel  ? 

"A.  There  were  a  number  of  activities  or  a  number  of  reasons  why 
we  could  be  of  some  value.  I  mentioned  before  the  income  value  to  the 
Communist  Party,  which  was  not  inconsiderable.  And  the  services  that 
were  provided  for  striking  families,  and  they  were  really  necessary,  that 
was  provided.  We  also  provided  medical  services  for  Communist  Party 
functionaries  when  necessary. 

"Q.  By  Communist  Party  functionaries  do  you  mean  full  time  of- 
ficials of  the  Communist  Party? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  One  who  spends  all  of  his  time  at  party  work? 

"A.  Yes.  They  needed  the  help.  They  don't  make  very  much. 

"Q.  Their  salaries  are  inconsiderable? 

"A.  Eemarkably  low.  I  don't  know  how  they  live  on  it  or  how  they 
did  live  on  it.  We  had  other  functions.  During  the  Soviet-Nazi  Pact, 
and  this  is  a  rather  important  function,  we  discussed  the  setting  up 
of  a  communications  center,  an  underground  communications  center, 
which  would  consist  of  being  able  to  relay  messages  or  informational 
material  from  Communist  Party  leaders,  or  people  to  other  Commu- 
nist leaders  in  this  way.  Someone  would  come  in  and  make  an  appoint- 
ment with  a  doctor.  The  doctor's  office  is  a  very  sacred  thing.  We  talk 
about  doctor-patient  relationships;  it  is  sacred.  Of  course,  we  never 
used  it  at  that  time,  but  this  was  the  theoretical  set-up. 

"Q.  That  directive  came  down  from  above? 

"A.  That  is  right.  We  didn't  think  of  this.  This  was  thought  up  for 
us  and  it  was  accepted  because  we  thought  it  was  the  necessary  thing 
to  do. 

"Q.  Particularly  at  that  time? 

"A.  At  that  time,  sure. 

"Q.  All  right. 

"Q.  It  would  be  very  easy  to  transmit  messages  when  you  couldn't 
use  the  telephone  because  the  wires  might  be  tapped,  and  you  couldn't 
write  letters  because  they  could  be  picked  up  at  the  post  office,  and 
you  couldn't  meet  people  in  the  street.  We  had  this  sort  of  a  plan 
set  up,  but  we  did  not  have  occasion  to  use  it.  Maybe  it  was  used  and 
we  didn't  know  about  it. 


282  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

"Q.  To  put  this  in  its  proper  political  framework,  I  asked  you 
why  you  were  directed  from  above  to  set  up  an  underground  appa- 
ratus for  communication  by  the  utilization  of  doctors'  offices  at  that 
particular  time,  you  said  because  it  was  during  the  latter  part  of  the 
era  of  the  Soviet-Nazi  Pact. 

"A.  It  was  during  the  Soviet-Nazi  Pact.  We  had  a  feeling  that  at 
that  time  the  Communist  Party  would  be  driven  underground.  Here 
we  were  very  much  upset  about  Hitler  and  we  found  that  the  Soviet 
Union,  whom  we  all  extolled  to  the  sky  because  of  anti-Semitism,  and 
so  forth,  suddenly  made  a  bedfellow  of  Hitler.  It  was  a  rather  sur- 
prising thing. 

"Q.  In  the  United  States  you  were  afraid  laws  would  be  passed 
and  steps  taken  to  drive  the  party  underground  ? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  You  had  to  prepare  channels  of  activity  and  communications 
against  that  eventuality? 

"A.  That  is  right.  The  Communist  Party  is  always  on  the  ball 
when  it  comes  to  self-preservation. 

"Q.  You  knew  that  because  you  were  in  it? 

"A.  Yes,  because  we  were  in  it.  There  were  a  couple  of  other  things 
that  I  believe  might  be  interesting.  We  had  a  large  mailing  list  of 
patients.  From  time  to  time  we  would  send  out  mailings  of  Communist 
Party  literature,  such  as  the  Daily  People's  World  or  mailings  of  the 
New  York  Daily  Worker,  or  leaflets  that  we  could  get.  We  would  have 
petitions  in  the  office  for  patients  to  sign,  if  they  were  patients. 
Doctors  are  pretty  terrific  people  and  they  often  signed  a  petition 
without  questioning  too  much  the  motives  behind  it.  I  even  went  so 
far  that  I  had  some  of  the  deliverymen  coming  from  the  pharma- 
ceutical office  sign  petitions,  too.  They  thought  it  was  all  right. 

"Q.  They  certainly  were  not  Communists? 

"A.  No,  they  certainly  were  not  Communists. 

"Q.  They  were  unaware  of  the  prestige  that  you  exercised  as  a 
Communist  Party  member  and  unwittingly  lent  their  names  to  the 
Communist  Party  cause? 

"A.  That  is  right. 

"Q.  So  the  doctors  were  of  enormous  value  to  the  party  for  that 
reason  ? 

"A.  That  is  right. 

"Q.  Did  you  endeavor  to  attract  a  progressive  type  of  patient? 

"A.  That  is  a  matter  of  magnetism,  let  us  say.  People  with  a 
progressive  feeling  or  a  feeling  for  party  activities  will  automatically 
go  to  the  doctors  whom  they  think  are  sympathetic  to  their  ideological 
outlook. 


UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  283 

"Q.  Let  me  pose  a  hypothetical  situation  to  you,  Dr.  Light.  Take 
a  situation  like  we  are  in  the  middle  of  right  now,  where  certain 
doctors,  some  of  whom  have  already  been  identified  as  Communist 
Party  members,  are  the  recipients  of  subpenas  by  the  committee  of 
the  State  Legislature,  in  this  instance  the  California  State  Senate. 
Although  the  subpenas  have  been  issued  within  a  week  or  ten  days, 
would  it  be  possible,  or  would  it  have  been  possible  while  you  were 
a  Communist,  while  you  were  the  organizer  of  the  medical  branch  of 
the  professional  section,  to  persuade  your  progressive  contacts  and 
your  Communist  contacts  to  send  in  a  flood  of  letters,  abuses,  protests 
and  things  of  that  kind  to  the  committee? 

"A.  Of  course.  We  could  fill  a  hall  in  about  two  hours  time. 

"Q.  You  could  fill  a  hall  in  a  couple  of  hours  time? 

"A.  Oh,  sure.  We  would  have  no  difficulty  in  filling  a  tremendous 
hall  in  two  hours. 

"Q.  Was  that  part  of  the  party  technique? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  And  the  letters  also? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  Like  cards  and  letters? 

"A.  Telephone  calls  and  cards,  and  from  time  to  time  if  a  bit  of 
legislation  would  come  up  in  Washington  that  we  would  like  passed 
or  not  passed,  we  would  have  a  meeting — not  only  the  medical  branch, 
because  we  were  a  little  desultory  about  that,  but  the  party  generally 
did. 

"Q.  The  rank  and  file? 

"A.  Yes.  We  were  expected  to  immediately  write  letters,  call  meet- 
ings, make  telephone  calls  and  send  telegrams.  But  that  is  not  only 
party  activity.  I  think  all  pressure  groups  do  it. 

"Q.  Unquestionably,  but  I  want  to  know  how  fast  you  could  mobi- 
lize it  because  of  party  discipline  and  organization? 

"A.  In  no  time  at  all. 

"Q.  Filling  a  hall  in  a  couple  of  hours  with  sympathetic  party 
people  is  pretty  good. 

"A.  Yes,  we  would  do  quite  a  bit. 

"Q.  And  you  did? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  Were  the  offices  of  the  members  of  the  local  branch  of  the 
professional  section  utilized  for  the  dissemination  of  pro-party  liter- 
ature ? 

"A.  Yes.  We  had  literature  in  the  office.  Some  of  the  doctors  did 
not  because  they  did  not  want  to  be  too  open  about  it.  A  good  many 
of  us  did.  I  felt  I  was  in  it  under  my  own  name  and  that  was  the 


284  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN  CALIFORNIA 

belief  I  had  and  be  darned  if  I  would  hide  it,  so  we  had  literature 
around. 

"Q.  Getting  back  to  the  Duelos  letter,  that  was  one  of  the  reasons 
for  your  eventual  disillusionment? 

"A.  Yes,  that  is  right,  one  of  the  big  reasons. 

"Q.  Did  you  find  that  the  Communist  Party  was  not  the  medium 
through  which  you  could  achieve  the  things  that  you  intended  to 
achieve  when  you  joined  it,  that  is,  combatting  discrimination,  unfair 
practices  and  all  of  the  things  that  you  mentioned? 

"A.  I  found  that  although  those  were  the  things  they  talked  about 
to  some  extent,  they  were  simply  propaganda  or  publicity  media,  that 
actually  they  were  not  doing  it  for  the  benefit  of  the  individuals  or 
the  minorities  involved,  they  were  doing  it  in  order  to  stimulate  enough 
public  activity  and  interest  as  far  as  the  Communist  Party  is  concerned. 
Of  course,  the  Communist  Party  means  the  Soviet  Union. 

"I  have  yet  to  remember  anything  nice  said  about  the  United 
States  when  compared  with  the  Soviet  Union.  This  is  a  little  distressing 
when  most  of  us  live  here  and  love  it  here. 

"Q.  When  did  the  period  of  your  inactivity  and  disillusionment 
commence,  as  nearly  as  you  can  tell  us  ? 

' '  A.  There  was  no  specific  date.  It  was  a  gradual  thing.  This  meeting 
at  the  house  which  we  had  disgusted  me,  but  it  was  one  of  those  things 
that  you  forget  about.  Then  the  Duelos  letter  came  along.  That  was 
really  a  bombshell.  The  treatment  of  the  girl  I  had  in  my  office,  which 
was  a  couple  of  years  after  the  Duelos  letter — in  the  interim  I  had 
gone  to  a  few  meetings  in  a  very  haphazard  fashion.  I  hadn't  paid  any 
dues  because  I  wasn  't  interested.  I  didn  't  care  whether  they  liked  it  or 
not.  Then  the  final  blow — well,  not  the  final  blow,  next  to  the  final 
blow  was  the  telephone  call  from  Rose  Chernin.  But  the  final  thing 
that  jelled  it  was  the  outbreak  of  the  current  hostilities,  a  day  or  two 
days  after  the  Communists  invaded  South  Korea  I  turned  on  a  broad- 
cast and  Mr.  Handleman,  a  friend  of  onrs — 

"Q.  What  is  his  first  name? 

"A.  Tom,  I  think. 

"Q.  Howard? 

"A.  Howard,  yes.  He  made  a  broadcast  from  Korea.  He  is  as  straight 
and  honest  a  man  as  he  can  be.  He  broadcast  from  Korea.  He  was  sent 
down  on  a  news  mission.  He  found  the  materials  that  the  Soviets  sent 
into  North  Korea  with  the  Soviet  label  and  the  date,  current  stuff.  He 
said  he  wouldn  't  have  believed  it  if  he  hadn  't  seen  it.  We  talked  it  over 
at  home  for  a  few  days.  I  decided  we  had  enough  of  this.  I  called  the 
FBI  to  tell  them  I  had  been  in  it  and  I  would  like  to,  shall  I  say, 
confess  and  have  it  out  of  my  system,  which  is  what  we  did. 


UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  285 

' '  Q.  You  went  voluntarily  to  the  FBI  ? 

"A.  I  called  them  up  for  an  appointment,  yes. 

"Q.  You  gave  them  the  benefit  of  your  experiences? 

"A.  That  is  right. 

"Q.  You  have  had  nothing  to  do  with  the  Communist  Party  since? 

"A.  No. 

"Q.  I  think  that  you  testified  that  Dr.  Thomas  L.  Perry  tried  to 
persuade  you  to  become  reactivated  and  reinstated? 

' '  A.  That  is  right. 

"Q.  He  was,  of  course,  unsuccessful? 

"A.  That  is  right. 

"Q.  Was  there  any  particular  office  building  or  location  in  Los 
Angeles  where  there  was  a  concentration  of  doctors  known  to  you  to 
be  members,  or  to  have  been  members,  of  the  Communist  Party? 

"A.  There  were  a  couple  of  places. 

"Q.  Would  you  name  them? 

"A.  Yes.  One  was  a  medical  center,  the  Community  Medical  Center, 
where  there  was  a  large  accumulation,  a  large  conglomeration  of  Com- 
munist ideas. 

"Q.  You  knew  that  to  be  a  fact? 

"A.  Oh,  yes,  I  know  that  to  be  a  fact. 

"Q.  How  do  you  know  that? 

"A.  It  just  so  happens  I  was  present  in  the  office  at  two  or  three 
meetings  when  the  setup  of  the  Community  Medical  Center  was  being 
established. 

"Q.  You  were  present  and  helped? 

"A.  I  did  not  help  but  I  was  present.  They  talked  about  setting 
up  a  medical  center. 

"Q.  The  discussion  had  occurred  about  the  establishment  of  the 
Community  Medical  Center  was  heard  by  you  as  a  Communist? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  In  connection  with  your  membership  in  the  Medical  Branch 
of  the  Professional  Section  of  the  Communist  Party  of  Los  Angeles? 

"A.  That  is  right. 

"Q.  So,  of  course,  you  have  first  hand  knowledge  of  that  fact? 

"A.  Yes.  Then,  of  course,  the  other  place  is  a  building  on  Wilshire 
Boulevard  in  which  at  that  time  a  number  of  Party  members — let  us 
say  they  built  it. 

"Q.  They  built  it? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  Is  that  building  located  at  6333  Wilshire  Boulevard? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  There  is  a  high  concentration 


286  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

"A.  There  was.  I  don't  know  anything  about  it  now. 

"Q.  — of  doctors  there  who  were  known  to  you  as  members  of  the 
Communist  Party? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  Dr.  Light,  there  is  another  matter  I  would  like  to  go  into.  I 
asked  Dr.  Barker,  who  preceded  you  on  the  stand,  whether  or  not  he 
received  any  vilification  or  abuse  after  he  became  inactive  in  the  party. 
I  would  like  to  ask  you  the  same  question. 

"When  you  came  back  from  Washington,  having  testified  there 
concerning  some  of  these  things,  was  there  any  effort  to  discredit  you 
or  harass  you  in  any  way? 

"A.  Oh,  sure. 

"Q.  Would  you  describe  your  experiences,  please? 

"A.  Believe  me,  it  was  quite  an  experience.  I  suddenly  discovered 
that  I  was  doing  what  they  call  illegal  operations  in  the  office,  and  the 
reason  I  went  to  Washington  was  that  the  FBI  and  the  United  States 
Government  threatened  me  with  a  jail  sentence,  that  they  would  either 
expose  me  on  the  illegal  operations  or  I  would  go  to  Washington  and 
testitfy,  so  I  took  the  lesser  of  two  evils  as  far  as  they  were  concerned, 
or  the  greater  of  two  evils,  I  don't  know  which.  There  was  quite  a 
campaign  about  this  illegal  stuff,  because  it  came  from  various  parts 
of  the  city.  There  were  telephone  calls  made  to  the  office :  a  neighbor 
or  daughter,  or  relative  is  pregnant  and  doesn't  want  to  be  pregnant. 
Dr.  Light  does  abortions  in  the  office- — to  the  extent  that  the  California 
Osteopathic  Association  sent  an  investigator  down  to  tell  me  that  they 
heard  rumors  coming  through  the  office,  that  they  have  legal  help  and 
if  I  wanted  to  sue  anybody  for  libel,  and  did  I  need  police  protection 
for  either  physical  or  mental  safety.  I  told  them  that  if  I  needed  it 
I  would  let  them  know,  that  I  thought  this  thing  would  ride  itself  out, 
and  it  did.  Of  course,  we  had  problems  with  people  in  the  office  who 
would  stand  at  the  door  and  stop  patients  from  coming  in,  making  all 
sorts  of  comments  about  the  horrible  woman  who  was  such  a  danger  to 
the  other  people.  Of  course,  all  of  these  things  ride  their  wave. 

"  Q.  Was  that  in  conformity  with  the  process  that  had  been  familiar 
to  you  while  you  were  a  party  member? 

"A.  It  is  a  constant  pattern. 

"Q.  It  is  a  pattern? 

"A.  I  would  think  so.  It  depends  on  what  the  individual's  work 
consists  of. 

"Q.  You  have  had  no  difficulty  recently  along  this  line? 

"A.  No,  but  I  probably  will  for  the  next  couple  of  weeks,  but  we 
won't  worry  about  it. 

' '  Q.  You  are  not  worried  about  it  ? 

"A.  No. 


UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  287 

"Mr.  Combs:  Dr.  Light,  I  think  that  is  all,  with  the  exception  of 
asking  yon  to  identify  some  names  that  I  am  about  to  read  to  you. 

"Senator  Thompson:  I  would  like  to  ask  one  question  of  the  Doctor, 
Mr.  Chairman,  I  don't  know  if  it  is  quite  fair. 

"Q.  Do  you  know  the  witnesses  subpenaed  here  and  who  testified 
because  their  names  have  been  mentioned? 

"A.  I  know  some  of  them. 

"Q.  Do  you  believe  that  these  doctors  are  now  at  the  present  time 
thinking  of  the  underprivileged,  or  are  they  thinking  of  the  Com- 
munist Party  and  Soviet  Russia? 

"Chairman  Burns:  Do  you  mean  the  ones  in  connection  with  the 
Community  Medical  Center? 

1 '  The  Witness :  Oh,  the  ones  connected  with  the  Community  Medi- 
cal Center? 

' '  Chairman  Burns :  Some  of  them  may  be  thinking  of  the  under- 
privileged, but  it  seems  to  me  that  if  they  are  real  hep — they  are 
smart,  they  know  this  is  tied  up  with  the  Communist  Party — that  they 
are  thinking  more  of  the  Communist  Party  and  the  Soviet  Union  than 
the  few  underprivileged  in  the  United  States. 

' '  Senator  Thompson :  Doctor,  at  those  meetings  which  you  attended 
when  you  were  active  in  the  party,  did  those  meetings  consist  of  the 
local  groups,  or  were  there  people  from  other  areas,  you  might  say, 
leaders  in  the  Communist  Party  who  attended  your  meetings? 

"A.  Not  always.  Occasionally  we  would  have  a  leader  from  the  cen- 
tral part  of  the  city,  one  of  the  leaders  of  the  Los  Angeles  party,  or 
one  of  the  visitors  from  the  New  York  party  would  attend  the  meet- 
ings with  the  doctors.  That  was  not  too  often,  but  it  happened  occa- 
sionally. 

"Senator  Thompson:  Thank  you  very  much,  Doctor. 

' '  The  Witness  :  You  are  welcome. 

"Q.  (By  Mr.  Combs)  Dr.  Light,  I  will  read  you  some  names  and 
ask  you  if  you  can  identify  these,  or  any  of  them,  as  having  been 
members  of  the  Communist  Party  at  the  time  you  were  a  party  member. 
You  have  identified  Dr.  Murray  Abowitz  as  a  member  of  the  Com- 
munist Party.  Do  you  recognize  the  witness  who  preceded  you  on  the 
stand,  Dr.  Oner  Barker? 
A.  Yes. 

Q.  Was  he  a  member  of  the  branch  with  which  you  were  affiliated? 
A.  Yes. 
Q.  He  was? 
A.  Yes. 

'Q.  You  knew  him  in  the  branch? 
A.  Yes,  I  knew  him. 
'Q.  Dr.  Leo  Bigelman? 


288  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN  CALIFORNIA 

A.  Yes. 

Q.  Dr.  Franklin  Bissell? 

A.  Yes. 

Q.  Dr.  Jacob  Bruekman? 

A.  Yes. 

Q.  Dr.  Oscar  Elkins? 

A.  Yes. 

Q.  Dr.  Hyman  Engelberg? 

A.  Yes. 

Q.  Dr.  Morris  Feder  ? 

A.  Yes. 

Q.  Dr.  Wilbur  Z.  Gordon? 

A.  Yes. 

Q.  Dr.  Joseph.  Hittelman? 

A.  Yes. 

Q.  I  think  you  mentioned  Dr.  Walter  Karpman  before  ? 

A.  No.  I  could  not  identify  him  as  being  in  the  party. 

Q.  You  could  not  identify  him  as  being  in  the  party? 

A.  I  have  never  seen  him  at  a  party  meeting. 

Q.  Dr.  Harold  Koppleman  ? 

A.  Yes. 

Q.  Dr.  Milton  Lester  ? 

A.  Yes. 

Q.  Dr.  Milton  Z.  London? 

A.  I  have  seen  him  at  some  meetings,  but  I  could  not  identify  him 

sure  to  be  a  member  of  the  party. 

Q.  At  what  sort  of  meetings  did  you  see  him  ? 

A.  I  don't  remember,  which  is  a  problem. 

Q.  Dr.  Simpson  Marcus? 

A.  Yes. 

Q.  Is  that  S-i-m-p-s-o-n,  or  S-i-m-s-o-n? 

A.  I  think  it  is  S-i-m-p-s-o-n. 

Q.  Dr.  Saul  Matlin,  Doctor  of  Osteopathy? 

A.  Yes. 

Q.  Was  he  a  member  of  that  branch? 

A.  He  was  a  member  of  the  branch. 

Q.  Dr.  Alexander  Pennes  ? 

A.  Yes. 

Q.  Dr.  Thomas  L.  Perry  ? 

A.  Yes. 

Q.  Dr.  Frederick  Reynolds? 

A.  Yes. 

Q.  Dr.  Alexander  Riskin? 


UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  289 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  Whom  you  have  already  identified? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  Dr.  Gordon  Rosenblum? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  Dr.  Max  Schoen,  a  dentist? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  S-c-h-o-e-n? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  Dr.  Max  Sosin,  a  dentist? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  Was  he  a  member  of  that  unit? 

"A.  He  was  a  member  of  the  unit. 

"Q.  Dr.  Sam  Sperling? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  Rowland  Sutton? 

"A.  Never  heard  of  him. 

"Q.  You  did  not  know  him? 

"A.  No. 

"Q.  Robert  Peck? 

"A.  No,  I  don't  know  him. 

"Q.  Did  you  ever  know  a  man  in  the  Communist  Party  who  was  a 
pharmacist  by  the  name  of  Arthur  Lishner  ? 

"A.  I  knew  Arthur  Lishner  and  I  have  seen  him  at  parties,  social 
functions,  but  I  cannot  identify  him  as  being  a  member  of  the  party. 

"Q.  Be  sure  the  record  is  straight,  you  cannot  identify  him  as  a 
member  of  the  Communist  Party,  but  you  have  been  present  at  Com- 
munist social  functions  at  which  he  was  also  present? 

"A.  That  is  right. 

1 '  Q.  Where  is  his  office,  or  place  of  business,  if  you  know  ? 

"A.  I  don't  know. 

"Q.  Doctor  of  Osteopathy,  Jack  Nedelman? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  Was  he  a  member  of  your  branch? 

"A.  He  was  a  member  of  our  branch. 

"Q.  Bertha  Reynolds? 

"A.  Yes. 

1 '  Q.  What  was  her  profession  ? 

"A.  I  think  she  was  the  wife — she  is  the  wife  of  Dr.  Fred  Reynolds. 

"Q.  Did  you  know  her  as  a  Communist  Party  member? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  Dr.  Sidney  Bruckman? 

"A.  Yes. 


290  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

Q.  Was  he  a  member  of  the  same  branch  ? 
A.  He  was  a  member  of  the  same  branch. 
Q.  Edward  Goodlaw? 
A.  Yes,  he  was  a  member  of  the  party. 
Q.  Is  he  a  physician? 
A.  No.  He  is  an  optometrist. 
'  Q.  Louis  Shoenfield  ?  S-h-o-e-n-f-i-e-l-d  ? 
'A.  I  think  it  is  S-c-h-o-e-n-f-i-e-l-d. 
Q.  What  is  his  profession  ? 
A.  He  is  a  dentist. 

Q.  He  was  a  member  of  the  same  branch  ? 
"A.  That  is  right. 

;Mr.  Combs:  I  think  that  is  all,  Dr.  Light.  I  want  to  express  the 
gratitude  of  myself  and  the  committee  for  your  courage  and  forthright- 
ness  in  giving  us  the  benefit  of  your  experiences. 
' '  The  Witness :  You  are  very  welcome. 
"Mr.  Combs :  May  the  witness  be  excused? 
' '  Chairman  Burns :  Yes,  the  witness  may  be  excused. 

TESTIMONY  OF  MRS.  RUTH  DRADER 

"Q-   (By  Mr.  Combs)  :  Will  you  state  your  name,  please? 

"A.  RuthDrader. 

"Q.  D-r-a-d-e-r? 

' '  A.  That  is  correct. 

"  Q.  What  is  your  address  ? 

"A.  457-A  West  California  Street,  Glendale,  California. 

' '  Q.  Approximately  how  long  have  you  resided  at  that  address  ? 

"A.  Approximately  a  year. 

' '  Q.  Mrs.  Drader,  you  were  employed  by  this  committee,  were  you  not  ? 

"A.  That  is  right. 

"Q.  Would  you  fix  the  approximate  date  that  your  employment 
commenced  ? 

"A.  Well,  I  would  fix  it  in  the  latter  part  of  1950. 

"  Q.  It  extended  until  about  when  ? 

"A.  As  of  now. 

"Q.  As  of  now? 

"A.  To  my  knowledge. 

"Q.  As  a  part  of  your  employment  did  you  affiliate,  or  did  you  be- 
come affiliated  with  an  organization  known  as  the  Arts,  Sciences  and 
Professions  Council,  Medical  Division  ? 

' '  A.  Yes,  sir. 

"Q.  Will  you  give  us  the  approximate  date  of  your  affiliation  with 
that  organization  ? 


UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  291 

"A.  The  date  I  actually  took  membership  was  on  December  2,  1950, 
at  a  membership  convention  meeting  at  Stanley  Hall,  1057  North  Stanley 
Avenue. 

"Q.  1057  North  Stanley  Avenue,  Los  Angeles? 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  Did  you  ever  hold  any  office  in  the  Medical  Division  of  the  Arts, 
Sciences  and  Professions  Council  ? 

"A.  No  office.  I  was  on  the  Executive  Board  of  the  division — not  the 
ASP,  just  the  Medical  Division. 

' '  Q.  How  long  were  you  a  member  of  its  Executive  Board  ? 

' '  A.  Approximately  a  year. 

1 '  Q.  I  have  before  me  and  I  see  that  you  have  before  you  an  index  of 
meetings  attended  by  you  ? 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  During  the  date  of  your  employment. 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  I  wish  to  identify  them  now  for  the  record.  Will  you  kindly  check 
your  list  as  I  read  mine  so  that  we  will  be  sure  and  not  make  any  mistakes  ? 

"A.  Fine. 

' '  Q.  During  the  period  of  time  that  you  attended  these  meetings  you 
became  affiliated  with  other  organizations  ? 

"A.  Absolutely. 

"Q.  In  addition  to  the  Medical  Division  of  the  Arts,  Sciences  and 
Professions  Council,  did  you  not? 

"A.  Absolutely. 

"Q.  You  also  attended  those  meetings? 

"A.  Yes,  sir. 

"Q.  Either  at  the  meetings,  or  within  them,  or  immediately  there- 
after, did  you  place  in  writing  a  report  of  the  people  present,  the 
substance  of  what  was  said,  and  a  description  of  the  activities  that 
transpired  in  each  case? 

' '  A.  Yes,  sir. 

' '  Q.  You  sent  those  reports  where  ? 

"A.  To  your  committee. 

"Q.  Did  you  in  each  instance,  or  in  as  many  instances  where  such 
things  were  possible  or  feasible,  collect  literature,  booklets,  pamphlets, 
advertisements,  broadsides,  and  other  printed  materials  which  you  at- 
tached to  your  reports  as  exhibits? 

"A.  Yes,  sir.  And  also  things  that  came  to  me  through  the  mail. 

"Q.  And  also  things  that  came  to  you  through  the  mail  as  a  result  of 
your  attendance  at  meetings  ? 

' '  A.  That  is  right. 


292  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN  CALIFORNIA 

"Q.  In  your  affiliations  with  organizations  that  we  are  about  to 
describe  ? 

' '  A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  On  October  29,  1950,  did  you  attend  a  pre-election  rally  spon- 
sored by  the  Los  Angeles  Communist  Party  at  the  Embassy  Auditorium 
in  this  city  ? 

"A.  Correct. 

"Q.  On  November  10th,  1950,  did  you  attend  a  membership  meeting 
sponsored  by  the  Arts,  Sciences  and  Professions  Council  at  the  Globe 
Theater,  7156  Beverly  Boulevard? 

' '  A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  On  the  14th  day  of  November,  1950,  did  you  attend  a  Southern 
California  Peace  Crusade  meeting  at  Farber's  Hall  in  Los  Angeles? 

' '  A.  Yes,  sir. 

' '  Q.  On  December  2,  1950,  did  you  attend  a  membership  convention 
of  the  Arts,  Sciences  and  Professions  Council  held  at  Stanley  Hail, 
1057  North  Stanley  Avenue  in  Los  Angeles? 

' '  A.  That  is  correct.  Mr.  Combs,  there  was  also  not  listed  in  the  index, 
but  in  my  reports,  part  of  the  convention,  which  was  Saturday-Sunday. 

"Q.  The  one  I  last  mentioned  ? 

"A.  Yes,  December  2  and  3.  The  reports  cover  that. 

"  Q.  Was  it  held  at  the  same  location  ? 

' '  A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  On  tLe  18th  day  of  January,  1951,  did  you  attend  a  meeting 
sponsored  by  an  organization  known  as  the  Committee  for  a  Far  Eastern 
Policy  at  Channing  Hall,  2936  West  8th  Street,  Los  Angeles  ? 

' '  A.  That  is  correct.  That  is  the  Unitarian  Church. 

' '  Q.  The  First  Unitarian  Church  ? 

' '  A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  Then  on  the  20th  day  of  January,  1951,  did  you  attend  a  meet- 
ing spon jored  by  the  Arts,  Sciences  and  Professions  Council,  in  Stanley 
Hall? 

"A.  Correct. 

' '  Q.  On  the  22nd  day  of  January,  1951,  did  you  attend  the  Unitarian 
Fellowship  for  Social  Justice  meeting  in  a  room  known  as  the  Madame 
Severance  Koom,  2936  West  8th  Street,  Los  Angeles? 

' '  A.  Yes.  That  is  another  division  of  the  First  Unitarian  Church. 

"  Q.  On  the  29th  day  of  January,  1951,  did  you  attend  a  meeting  in 
the  Madame  Severance  Room  at  the  same  place  ? 

"A.  Yes,  sir. 

"Q.  The  speaker  on  that  occasion  was  Martin  Hall? 

"A.  Yes. 


UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  293 

"Q.  On  the  1st  day  of  February,  1951,  did  you  attend  a  meeting 
sponsored  by  the  Committee  for  a  Democratic  Far  Eastern  Policy  ? 

"A.  Yes,  sir. 

' '  Q.  That  also  was  held  in  Channing  Hall,  2936  West  8th  Street  ? 

"A.  Yes. 

1 '  Q.  That  is  the  Unitarian  Church  ? 

"A.  Yes,  it  is. 

"Q.  On  the  fifth  day  of  February,  1951,  did  you  attend  the  Unitarian 
Fellowship  for  Social  Justice  ? 

' '  A.  Yes,  sir. 

"  Q.  The  meeting  held  at  the  Unitarian  Church  ? 

"A.  Yes,  sir. 

"Q.  On  the  12th  day  of  April,  1951,  did  you  attend  a  membership 
meeting  of  the  Arts,  Sciences  and  Prof essions  Council  in  Stanley  Hall? 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  All  of  these,  of  course,  in  the  City  of  Los  Angeles? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  On  the  11th  day  of  May,  1951,  did  you  attend  a  meeting  of  the 
Medical  Division  of  the  Arts,  Sciences  and  Professions  Council,  at  830 
North  Melrose  Hill? 

"A.  Yes,  sir. 

"Q.  Is  that  the  residence  of  Dr.  Jack  Flasher? 

"A.  Yes,  it  is. 

"Q.  At  that  time  was  he  a  member  of  the  Medical  Division  of  the 
Arts,  Sciences  and  Professions  Council  ? 

11  A.  Yes,  sir. 

"Q.  He  was? 

' !  A.  Yes,  he  was. 

1 '  Q.  "Was  Dr.  Murray  Abowitz  present  at  that  meeting  ? 

"A.  He  was  the  chairman  of  the  meeting. 

"Q.  Was  Dr.  Max  Schoen  present  at  that  meeting? 

"A.  Yes,  and  he  was  one  of  the  speakers  at  the  meeting. 

"Q.  What  was  the  main  topic  of  the  meeting? 

"A.  The  purpose  was  to  elect  an  executive  board  for  the  Medical 
Division.  Then  we  went  into — it  was  during  the  time  of  the  agitation  of 
the  so-called  police  brutality  in  connection  with  racial  minorities.  There 
was  quite  a  discussion  of  that. 

"Q.  I  see.  Then  on  May  15,  1951,  did  you  attend  another  meeting,  a 
membership  meeting  sponsored  by  the  Arts,  Sciences  and  Professions 
Council  in  Stanley  Hall? 

"A.  Yes,  sir. 

■ '  Q.  That  is  located  where  ? 

"A.  That  is  the  First  Unitarian  Church. 


294  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

"Q.  Was  Dr.  P.  Price  Cobbs  on  that  occasion  present? 

"A.  He  was  chairman. 

"Q.  What  about  Martin  Hall? 

"A.  Martin  Hall,  Waldo  Salt  and  Dick  Powell  were  speakers. 

' '  Q.  Dick  Powell  is  not  the  actor  ? 

' '  A.  No.  He  is  a  radio  writer  and  not  an  actor — an  entirely  different 
person. 

"Q.  On  the  eighth  day  of  June,  1951,  did  you  attend  a  meeting  at 
the  Embassy  Auditorium? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  Sponsored  by  the  Arts,  Sciences  and  Professions  Council? 

"A.  That  is  correct.  That  was  a  big  rally  welcoming  home  Dalton 
Trumbo  after  his  release. 

"Q.  From  prison? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  Did  Herbert  Biberman  speak  on  that  occasion? 

"A.  Yes.  He  was  one  of  the  speakers.  Dr.  P.  Price  Cobbs  was 
chairman. 

"Q.  What  was  his  official  position  in  the  Arts,  Sciences  and  Profes- 
sions Council,  if  you  know  ? 

"A.  Herbert  Biberman? 

"Q.  No,  Dr.  P.  Price  Cobbs. 

"A.  Dr.  P.  Price  Cobbs,  the  last  I  heard,  I  think  at  that  time  he  was 
still  on  the  National  Executive  Board. 

"Q.  Of  the  National  Arts,  Sciences  and  Professions  Council  f 

' '  A.  Yes.  I  believe  you  have  a  ballot  that  I*f urnished  the  committee 
showing  his  name. 

"Q.  Yes.  We  will  produce  it  in  evidence  later.  Was  Paul  Jarrico 
present  at  that  meeting? 

"A.  He  was  one  of  the  speakers. 

"Q.  And  of  course,  Mr.  Dalton  Trumbo. 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  On  the  fifteenth  day  of  June,  1951,  did  you  attend  a  meeting  of 
the  Science  and  Education  Division  Forum  ? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  Of  the  Arts,  Sciences  and  Professions  Council  at  the  First 
Unitarian  Church? 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  Was  Dr.  Harold  Orr  present  on  that  occasion? 

"A.  Yes,  but  I  did  not  know  him  as  a  doctor.  I  knew  his  as  Har- 
old Orr. 

"Q.  Were  you  accompanied  to  some  of  these  meetings  by  someone 
else? 


UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  295 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  That  person  has  given  the  committee  an  affidavit? 

"A.  Yes.  One  of  the  people  accompanied  me. 

' '  Q.  That  was  given  to  us  in  your  presence  ? 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  On  the  22nd  day  of  June,  1951,  did  you  attend  a  meeting  at 
7410  Sunset  Boulevard,  the  Arts,  Sciences  and  Professions  office,  or  at 
least  it  was  at  that  time  ? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  At  which  time  you  attended  a  meeting  of  the  Executive  Board 
of  the  Medical  Division? 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

"  Q.  Who  was  the  chairman  on  that  occasion  ? 

"A.  Dr.  Murray  Abowitz. 

"  Q.  Was  Dr.  Richard  Lippman  there  ? 

"A.  Yes.  He  was  the  speaker. 

"Q.  On  the  twenty-seventh  day  of  June,  1951,  did  you  attend  a 
meeting  at  the  same  place,  7410  Sunset  Boulevard? 

''A.  Yes. 

"Q.  That  was  the  office  of  the  Arts,  Sciences  and  Professions 
Council? 

"A.  Yes,  it  was  at  that  time.  That  is  correct.  They  had  moved  from 
the  Crossroads  of  the  World  just  a  short  time  previously  into  this 
Sunset  Boulevard  address,  7410. 

"Q.  On  July  3,  1951,  did  you  attend  a  meeting  at  the  same  place 
of  the  Arts,  Sciences  and  Professions  Council? 

"A.  Yes.  That  was  the  Peace  Committee. 

"Q.  Who  was  the  chairman  on  that  occasion? 

"A.  Dr.  Richard  Lippman. 

"Q.  On  the  fourteenth  day  of  July,  1951,  did  you  attend  a  meeting 
sponsored  by  the  15th  Assembly  District,  Independent  Progressive 
Party? 

"A.  It  was  not  a  meeting,  Mr.  Combs.  It  was  strictly  a  fund-raising 
party.  It  was  through  my  affiliation  with  ASP 

"Q.  By  'ASP'  do  you  mean  the  Arts,  Sciences  and  Professions 
Council? 

"  A.  The  Arts,  Sciences  and  Professions  Council — it  was  through  my 
affiliation  there  that  I  attended  this  fund-raising  party  for  the  Inde- 
pendent Progressive  Party. 

"Q.  That  was  held  at  7560  Melrose  Avenue? 

"A.  Yes.  That  is  a  bar  and  cocktail  lounge  that  they  had  taken 
over  for  the  evening. 

"Q.  Then  on  July  15,  1951,  did  you  attend  a  meeting  at  the  Humanist 
Hall,  2307  South  Union  Avenue? 


296  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  What  kind  of  a  meeting  was  that? 

"A.  It  was  a  time  when  they  were  trying — they  called  themselves 
the  Committee  for  Amalgamation.  It  is  the  only  meeting  of  that  or- 
ganization I  ever  attended.  I  don't  know  if  it  is  still  in  existence. 
You  are  perhaps  familiar  with  the  fact  that  in  this  area  at  that  time, 
there  were  two  musicians  union  locals.  One  was  white  and  the  other 
was  Negro.  The  Committee  for  Amalgamation  was  to  amalgamate  the 
two  organizations.  It  was  agitating  to  amalgamate  the  two  unions  and 
have  one  musicians  union. 

"Q.  How  did  you  happen  to  attend  that  meeting? 

"A.  It  was  suggested  that  I  attend  as  a  member  of  the  Arts,  Sciences 
and  Professions  Council,  that  I  attend  this  meeting. 

"Q.  Was  it  a  large  meeting? 

"A.  Yes.  There  were  between  six  and  seven  hundred  people  present. 
The  big  drawing  card  was  Josephine  Baker.  The  singer  was  in  town 
at  that  time.  I  believe  she  was  doing  a  personal  appearance  at  the 
Orpheum  Theater.  They  got  her  to  agree  to  make  a  brief  appearance 
at  their  meeting.  She  rushed  from  the  theater  up  to  the  Humanist  Hall 
and  back.  It  was  matinee  day.  She  is  quite  a  well  known  entertainer. 
That  drew  a  lot  of  people.  It  was  also  a  fund-raising  affair. 

"Q.  On  the  seventeenth  day  of  July,  1951,  did  you  attend  a  meeting 
of  the  Arts,  Sciences  and  Professions  Council  Peace  Committee  at  7410 
Sunset  Boulevard? 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  Who  was  chairman  on  that  occasion? 

"A.  Dr.  Richard  Lippman. 

"Q.  On  the  twenty-second  day  of  July,  1951,  did  you  attend — shall 
we  call  it  ASP  henceforth  when  we  mean  Arts,  Sciences  and  Profes- 
sions Council? 

"  A.  All  right. 

"Q.  Did  you  attend  an  ASP  reception  for  John  Howard  Lawson  at 
the  office  of  the  council? 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  On  July  31,  1951,  did  you  attend  an  ASP  Peace  Committee 
meeting  at  7410  Sunset  Boulevard  ? 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  Who  was  the  chairman  on  that  occasion? 

"A.  Dr.  Richard  Lippman. 

"Q.  On  August  31,  1951,  did  you  attend  an  ASP  reception  for  John 
Howard  Lawson  in  the  Embassy  Auditorium? 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  Did  Mr.  Lawson  speak  on  that  occasion? 


UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  297 


"A.  Yes.  He  spoke  of  his  experiences  during  the  time  he  was  in 
prison  as  a  member  of  what  they  call  the  'Hollywood  Ten.' 

"Q.  For  what? 

"A.  For  contempt  of  Congress,  I  believe. 

"Q.  How  many  attended  that  meeting? 

"A.  Between  1,500  and  1,700.  It  was  a  full  house. 

' '  Q.  On  August  5,  1951,  did  you  attend  a  meeting  of  an  organization 
known  as  the  Civil  Rights  Congress? 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  Did  you  belong  to  that  organization? 

' '  A.  I  joined  at  that  time. 

1 '  Q.  This  was  held  at  the  Embassy  Auditorium  ? 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  Was  Mr.  John  Howard  Lawson  present  on  that  occasion? 

''A.  He  was  the  speaker,  among  others. 

"Q.  Who  was  the  chairman? 

' '  A.  Marguerite  Robinson. 

' '  Q.  Will  you  identify  her  if  you  can  ? 

"A.  At  that  time  she  was  executive  director,  I  believe,  of  the  Civil 
Rights  Congress,  the  Los  Angeles  Chapter. 

"Q.  About  how  many  people  were  present  on  that  occasion? 

"A.  Approximately  1,200. 

"Q.  Was  Mr.  Ben.  Margolis  present? 

' '  A.  Ben  Margolis  was  present  and  spoke. 

1 '  Q.  Was  Mr.  Don  Wheeldin  present  ? 

' '  A.  Mr.  Don  Wheeldin  was  present  and  was  one  of  the  speakers. 

"Q.  On  the  seventh  day  of  August,  1951,  were  you  requested  by  a 
person  or  persons,  to  accompany  that  person,  or  persons,  to  the  Office 
of  the  United  States  Attorney  in  Los  Angeles  ? 

"A.  Yes,  that  is  correct. 

" '  Q.  Will  you  describe  what  that  was,  please  ? 

"A.  May  I  refer  to  my  report  for  accuracy? 

"Q.  Surely.  Let's  get  this  in  the  record.  How  soon  after  you  went 
to  the  office  of  the  United  States  Attorney  was  it  that  you  made  your 
report?  When  did  you  write  it? 

"A.  The  same  day,  within  a  matter  of  an  hour  after  I  returned 
home. 

"Q.  All  right. 

"A.  On  that  morning,  it  was  Tuesday  morning,  during  the  conduct 
of  the  so-called  Smith  Act  trial. 

"Q.  That  was  a  prosecution  of  persons  accused  of  advocating  the 
overthrow  of  the  government  by  unlawful  means  ? 

"A.  That  is  correct.  During  that  period  of  time,  it  happened  that  I 
was  on  my  vacation  from  my  work.  The  Arts,  Sciences  and  Professions 


298  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

Council  group  knew  I  was  on  vacation  because  I  volunteered  to  go  into 
the  office  and  help  with  little  office  chores.  I  was  called  and  asked  to 
accompany  the  delegation  to  the  office  of  the  United  States  Attorney, 
Ernest  Tolin,  at  that  time.  The  reason  for  the  delegation  was  to  enter 
a  plea — it  wasn't  only  a  plea,  but  almost  a  demand,  that  he  intercede 
to  reduce  the  bail  for  the  Communist  leaders  who  were  on  trial.  Shall 
I  go  into  it  in  detail  at  this  time  ? 

"Q.I  will  question  you  about  it.  Did  you  go  with  that  delegation  ? 

"A.  Yes,  I  did. 

"Q.  Does  your  report  reflect  the  identity  of  the  individuals  with 
whom  you  went  ? 

' '  A.  That  is  correct.  Do  you  want  me  to  read  it  ? 

"  Q.  If  you  will,  please. 

"A.  The  original  delegation  was  made  up  of  Sara  jo  Lord. 

"Q.  Who  was  she? 

"A.  Sarajo  Lord  was  Executive  Secretary  of  the  Arts,  Sciences  and 
Professions  Hollywood  Theater. 

1 '  Q.  Her  first  name  is  spelled  as  one  word  ? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  S-a-r-a-j-o? 

"A.  That  is  correct.  Elaine  Glenn.  Her  husband  at  that  time  was  a 
reporter — Charlie  Glenn  of  the  Daily  People's  World.  Drucilla  Baetcke. 

' '  Q.  How  do  you  spell  her  last  name  ? 

"A.  B-a-e-t-c-k-e.  Mrs.  Max  Schoen. 

"Q.  S-c-h-o-e-n? 

"A.  That  is  correct.  And  myself.  Then  after  we  got  upstairs,  before 
we  went  in  to  see  Mr.  Tolin,  Mrs.  Nestor,  who  is  the  mother  of  Dorothy 
Healy 

"  Q.  Who  was  one  of  the  defendants  ? 

"A.  That  is  correct — she  was  one  of  the  leaders,  she  came  and  asked 
if  she  could  join  our  delegation.  Of  course,  she  was  very  happily  re- 
ceived. When  we  were  shown  into  Mr.  Tolin 's  office,  Sarajo  Lord  read 
a  prepared  statement  that  had  been  drawn  up  ready  for  presentation. 
That  was  the  end  of  that  phase  of  it.  Mr.  Tolin,  I  will  say,  was  very 
charming  to  the  delegation. 

"Q.  Courteous? 

"A.  Extremely  courteous,  but  he  made  no  commitment,  naturally. 
After  leaving  Mr.  Tolin 's  office  we  went  directly  down  to  the  court. 
It  was  in  Judge  James  C.  Carter's  court  where  the  trial  was  then  in 
progress. 

"Just  as  we  were  starting  to  enter  the  courtroom,  Charlie  Glenn 
came  over  and  talked  to  us,  and  Sarajo  Lord  gave  him  a  copy  of  the 
prepared  statement,  which  was  subsequently  published  in  the  Daily 
People's  World. 


UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  299 

"  Q.  This  all  occurred  in  your  presence  ? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  And  hearing,  of  course? 

' '  A.  Yes.  I  was  a  member  of  the  delegation. 

"Q.  On  the  9th  day  of  August,  1951,  did  you  attend  a  meeting  of 
the  ASP  at  7410  Sunset  Boulevard? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  At  which  the  Peace  Committee  met? 

' '  A.  That  is  correct. 

' '  Q.  Who  was  the  chairman  on  that  occasion  ? 

' '  A.  The  chairman  was  Dr.  Richard  Lippman. 

"Q.  Was  there  a  speaker  by  the  name  of  Maude  Russell  on  that 
occasion  ? 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

' '  Q.  Who  was  Maude  Russell,  if  you  know  ? 

"A.  It  is  my  understanding  Maude  Russell 

' '  Q.  Did  you  hear  her  speak  ? 

"A.  Oh,  yes,  I  heard  her  speak.  As  far  as  her  identity  is  concerned, 
she  was  introduced  as  having  been  very,  very  active  in  the  YWCA 
work,  I  believe  it  was,  in  China,  for  many  years.  Therefore,  she  was  an 
authority  on  Far  East  and  Chinese  affairs. 

' '  Q.  Do  you  know  whether  or  not  she  held  any  other  position  in  any 
other  organization? 

"A.  That  I  don't  know.  I  believe  that  at  that  time  she  had  left  the 
YWCA.  I  don't  believe  she  was  any  longer  affiliated  with  it. 

"Q.  What  time  did  that  meeting  take  place,  if  you  know? 

"A.  The  meeting  started  at  8.30  p.m. 

"Q.  It  lasted  how  long? 

"A.  I  don't  know  the  exact  time,  but  I  imagine 

"Q.  Do  you  have  your  notes  before  you? 

"A.  Yes,  I  have. 

"Q.  After  the  meeting  was  over  did  you  go  to  a  restaurant  with  some 
other  people? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  What  restaurant  was  that? 

"A.  It  was  the  Gotham  Restaurant  on  Hollywood  Boulevard  in 
Hollywood. 

"Q.  With  whom  did  you  go? 

"A.  There  was  a  little  group  of  us  after  the  meeting,  Lee  Bachelis. 

"Q.  Is  he  now  deceased? 

"A.  I  understand  that  he  is.  I  can't  say  definitely,  but  to  the  best  of 
my  understanding  he  is  now  deceased.  At  that  time  it  was  my  under- 
standing that  he  was  the  chairman  of  the  Bail-Bond  Fund  of  the  Civil 
Rights  Congress.  I  cannot  say  positively,  but  it  was  told  to  me. 


300  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

"Q.  We  have  it  by  other  evidence  that  is  sworn  to,  that  is  in  the 
committee's  possession  and  in  the  transcript.  It  is  a  matter  of  common 
knowledge. 

"A.  Fine.  After  the  meeting  adjourned,  he  invited  some  of  us,  a 
small  group,  to  accompany  him  to  the  Gotham  Restaurant.  At  that 
particular  meeting  I  sat  at  the  table  by  the  door,  and  as  people  came 
in  I  took  their  money  and  encouraged  them  to  buy  literature.  During 
the  little  intermission  in  the  meeting,  I  passed  the  little  basket  around 
to  take  up  a  collection,  and  so  forth.  We  were  included  in  his  group  to 
go  down  to  the  Gotham  Restaurant.  In  the  group  there  was  Maude 
Russell,  Lillian  Haas. 

' '  Q.  She  was  the  principal  speaker  ? 

"A.  She  was  the  principal  speaker. 

"Q.  H-a-a-s? 

"A.  H-a-a-s.  Dr.  Marvin  Sure  and  his  wife,  Jane  Grodzins  Sure. 

"Q.  How  do  you  spell  'Grodzins?'  Before  you  use  your  file,  Mrs. 
Drader,  we  had  better  identify  it.  Of  what  does  that  file  consist  ? 

"A.  It  consists  of  names  of  people  I  knew  in  various  organizations 
that  were  either  Communist  front  or  liberal  organizations.  I  have  listed 
on  that 

"Q.  By  'Communist  front'  do  you  mean  organizations  so  listed  by 
the  Department  of  Justice  ? 

"A.  Some  are,  such  as  the  L.  A.  Committee  for  the  Protection  of  the 
Foreign  Born,  and  a  few  of  those,  and  the  Civil  Bights  Congress.  I  made 
this  to  help  me  if  I  wanted  specific  information  in  a  hurry.  It  has  the 
name  of  the  individual  and  the  dates  of  meetings,  the  places  of  meet- 
ings, or  I  mean  the  sponsorship  of  the  meetings,  not  places.  Would  you 
like  to  see  one? 

"Q.  No,  but  I  would  like  to  get  a  description  in  the  record.  On  the 
upper  edge  which  protrudes  on  top  of  the  little  metal  drawer  in  which 
they  are  contained  are  a  series  of  multicolored  tabs:  white,  red,  green, 
and  so  on? 

"A.  Yes,  sir. 

"Q.  What  do  those  indicate  to  you? 

"A.  It  is  another  method  of  quick  reference  for  my  personal  benefit. 
The  cards  with  the  red  tab  are  individuals  who  have  been  cited  in  the 
House  Un-American  Activities  Reports  as  Communist  Party  members. 
They  have  been  identified  as  such. 

"Q.  By  sworn  testimony? 

"A.  By  sworn  testimony.  The  ones  with  white  tabs  are  doctors  of 
medicine,  M.D.'s.  The  ones  with  pink  tabs  are  in  the  medical  profes- 
sion other  than  M.D.  's,  such  as  nurses. 

"Q.  Radiologists,  and  so  on? 


UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN  CALIFORNIA  301 

"A.  Radiologists  are  M.D. 's. 

"Q.  I  see. 

"A.  But  nurses,  technicians,  medical  secretaries,  dental  hygienists, 
and  those  who  are  other  than  actual  doctors.  The  yellow  tabs  are  min- 
isters, rabbis — of  course,  I  have  never  run  across  any  priests — religious 
leaders. 

' '  The  brown  are  people  in  the  teaching  profession. 

"Q.  Educators? 

"A.  Educators,  yes.  The  green  are  attorneys. 

"Q.  Going  back  to  the  Gotham  Restaurant 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  have  you  named  all  of  the  people  who  accompanied  you 

there  ? 

"A.  No.  You  asked  me  for  the  spelling  of  Jane  Sure's  name.  It  is 
G-r-o-d-z-i-n-s. 

"Q.  Thank  you. 

"A.  She  is  also  an  attorney.  Ann  Wallace  was  the  name  she  used  in 
the  party.  Then  there  was  myself.  There  was  another  man,  I  didn't 
know  his  name,  but  I  had  seen  him  at  front  meetings  at  the  Embassy 
Auditorium,  and  in  particular  in  charge  of  the  book  and  literature 
tables — maybe  not  in  charge,  but  at  least  selling  literature  from  the 
progressive  book  store. 

"Q.  Did  you  go  into  the  Gotham  Restaurant  and  have  refreshments 
or  something  to  eat  ? 

"A.  Yes,  we  did. 

"Q.  Would  you  describe  what  occurred,  please? 

"A.  Maude  Russell  and  Lee  Bachelis  were  in  a  chatty  mood.  They 
discussed  some  of  the  various  experiences  they  had  in  the  past. 

1 ' Q.  Did  they  mention  the  party  ? 

"A.  Yes,  they  mentioned  the  party.  Lee  Bachelis  stated  as  an  example 
of  the  Communist  Party  discipline  the  manner  of  the  closing  of  the  New 
York  office  of  the  Yugoslav  Belief  Committee.  Prior  to  any  open  and 
public  knowledge  of  the  break  between  Tito  and  Stalin,  he  said  that  the 
office  had  received  a  cablegram.  He  did  not  designate  where  the  cable- 
gram came  from,  but  he  spoke  of  party  discipline,  so  I  judged  it  was 
from  some  party  headquarters,  ordering  that  this  office  be  closed  im- 
mediately. He  said  they  wondered  about  the  order,  but  because  of  very 
strict  discipline  no  one  mentioned  it.  And  within  48  hours  they  had  the 
office  closed.  They  closed  any  and  all  bank  accounts,  destroyed  records. 
The  office  was  left  as  if  no  one  had  ever  been  in  there.  It  was  a  period 
of  six  months  after  the  closing  of  the  office  before  the  break  between 
Tito  and  Stalin  was  announced  in  the  United  States  Press. 

"Q.  On  August  17,  1951,  did  you  attend  an  ASP  Medical  Division 
meeting  at  7410  Sunset  Boulevard  ? 


302  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

"A.  Yes,  I  did. 

' '  Q.  Was  the  chairman  on  that  occasion  Murray  Abowitz  ? 

"A.  Correct. 

"Q.  Among  the  speakers  were  Dr.  Thomas  L.  Perry  and  Dr.  Leo 
Bigelman  ? 

"A.  That  is  correct,  yes.  Did  you  unintentionally  skip  the  one  of 
August  12? 

"Q.  Yes,  I  am  sorry,  I  did.  I  omitted  one  on  August  12,  1951.  That 
was  an  ASP  Medical  Division  meeting? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  At  9620  Monte  Mar  Drive? 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  That  was  the  residence  of  Dr.  Alexander  Pennes? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  Dr.  Murray  Abowitz  was  chairman  on  that  occasion? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  Speakers  were  Dr.  Thomas  L.  Perry? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  Dr.  Richard  Lippman? 

"A.  Yes,  sir. 

"Q.  And  John  Howard  Lawson? 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

' '  Q.  The  next  one  you  have  described  on  the  seventeenth  of  August  ? 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  Then  on  the  twenty-first  of  August,  did  you  attend  an  ASP 
Peace  Committee  meeting? 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  At  ASP  Headquarters,  7410  Sunset  Boulevard? 

"A.  That  is  correct,  yes  sir. 

"Q.  Were  you  the  speaker  on  that  occasion? 

"A.  Not  the  speaker,  no,  sir.  I  was  asked  to  act  as  chairman  of  the 
meeting.  Dr.  Lippman  originally  intended  to  be  chairman,  but  he  had 
an  experiment  in  progress  and  he  could  not  leave.  It  was  over  at  the 
hospital.  It  had  to  do  with  animals  and  he  has  to  be  there.  I  was  called 
by  Sarajo  Lord  and  asked  if  I  could  come  over  a  little  early  and  open 
the  hall  and  act  as  chairman  of  the  meeting. 

" Q.  Did  you  have  a  key  to  the  premises? 

"A.  She  had  me  stop  by  the  office  on  my  way  home  from  work  and 
pick  up  the  key.  Elaine  Glenn  stayed  a  little  late.  She  was  doing 
office  work.  She  was  there  practically  every  day.  Elaine  stayed  and 
gave  me  the  key  to  the  filing  cabinet  where  the  money  was  left.  They 
left  the  key  under  the  corner  of  the  blotter  for  me. 

' '  Q.  You  merely  acted  as  chairman  of  the  meeting  ? 


UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  303 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  Who  was  the  featured  speaker? 

"A.  Victor  Perlo.  He  had  been  in  the  Federal  Government  in  Wash- 
ington. 

"Q.  A  federal  employee? 

"A.  A  federal  employee.  At  the  time  he  came  here  and  spoke  he 
was  no  longer  connected  with  the  Federal  Government.  He  was  an 
economist.  He  spoke  on  the  subject  of,  '  Can  American  Economy  Afford 
War?'  He  was  quite  an  honored  speaker  to  them. 

"Q.  On  the  twenty-third  of  August,  1951,  did  you  attend  an  ASP 
meeting  at  the  residence  of  Ronald  Sutton,  406  South  Hope  Street? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  In  Los  Angeles? 

"A.  Yes.  That  was  a  Medical  Division  meeting. 

"Q.  Was  Dr.  Marvin  V.  Sure  there? 

"A.  Yes.  He  was  chairman. 

"Q.  Was  Dr.  Murray  Abowitz  there? 

"A.  Yes.  He  was  speaker. 

"Q.  On  August  30,  1951,  did  you  attend  an  ASP  reception  for  an 
attorney  from  New  York  named  Abraham  Isserman? 

"A.  Yes. 

' '  Q.  That  was  at  ASP  headquarters  ? 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  Who  was  the  chairman  on  that  occasion? 

"A.  John  Howard  Lawson. 

"Q.  Was  one  of  the  speakers  Herta  Uerkvitz? 

"A.  Yes.  Abraham  Isserman 's  trip  out  here  coincided  with  the  time 
that  the  House  Un-American  Activities  Committee  was  holding  their 
hearings.  Herta  Uerkvitz  was  one  of  those  under  subpena  at  the  time. 

"Q.  Was  William  Esterman  there  also? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  Did  he  speak? 

"A.  Yes,  he  did.  There  were  two  meetings  on  the  same  evening.  The 
one  we  have  referred  to  at  the  office  was  the  public  meeting.  From 
there,  after  it  adjourned,  there  was  a  continuation  of  the  reception  by 
invitation  at  the  home  of  Sidney  Goldfarb. 

"Q.  Let  me  understand  you.  The  meeting  that  you  first  described 
at  7410  Sunset  Boulevard  was  open  to  any  member  of  the  ASP  ? 

"A.  It  was  a  public  meeting. 

"Q.  Anyone  could  go? 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  After  the  meeting  was  adjourned,  or  at  least  concluded,  then  a 
reception  or  something  was  given? 

"A.  A  social. 


304  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN  CALIFORNIA 

"  Q.  It  was  held  at  the  residence  of  Mr.  Sidney  Goldf arb  ? 

"A.  Yes. 

'  <  Q.  1745  North  Vista  Street  ? 

"A.  Yes. 

' '  Q.  That  was  by  invitation  only  ? 

"A.  Yes. 

' '  Q.  Was  it  limited  to  members  of  the  ASP  ? 

"  A.  I  think  so.  However,  I  cannot  say  definitely.  There  were  quite  a 
few  people  there,  50  or  75.  They  milled  around.  It  was  more  or  less  a  social 
function. 

' '  Q.  Who  acted  as  master  of  ceremonies,  or  chairman,  at  the  reception  ? 

"A.  John  Howard  Lawson,  more  or  less  took  over.  He  took  Abraham 
Isserman  around  and  introduced  him.  Some  people  got  up  and  did  a 
little  entertaining.  They  spoke  a  bit  about  how  they  were  going  to  act 
at  the  time  of  the  House  committee  hearings. 

"Q.  Was  it  to  plan  strategy  for  them  at  the  hearings? 

"A.  No. 

"Q.  What  was  it? 

"A.  They  were  just  informing  us  that  they  were  going  to  take  the 
stand,  but  they  would  not  cooperate  with  the  committee.  There  was  no 
strategy  planned  at  all,  no. 

"Q.  On  September  7,  1951,  did  you  attend  a  Medical  Division  meet- 
ing at  109  North  Highland  Avenue? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  At  the  residence  of  Dr.  Morris  Feder? 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

' '  Q.  Was  the  chairman  Dr.  Thomas  L.  Perry  ? 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  Did  the  speakers  include  Dr.  Max  Schoen? 

"A.  Yes,  Dr.  Max  Schoen  and  Dr.  Goodlaw. 

"Q.  What  was  Dr.  Goodlaw 's  first  name? 

"A.  Edward.  The  main  speaker  was  an  attorney  named  William 
Murrish.  He  was  represented  as  a  member  of  the  firm  from  Ben  Mar- 
golis'  office.  His  purpose  in  coming  to  the  meeting  and  being  the  main 
speaker  was  to  explain  to  us  the  reasons  for  the  doctors  and  persons 
who  had  been  subpoenaed  taking  the  stand  they  were  taking,  and  their 
legal  grounds  for  doing  so. 

"Q.  On  the  22nd  of  September,  1951,  did  you  attend  a  Southern 
California  Peace  Crusade  meeting? 

"A.  Yes. 

' '  Q.  At  607  Southwestern  Avenue,  the  Park  Manor  ? 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  Was  one  of  the  speakers  on  that  occasion  a  person  named  Sender 
Garlin? 


UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN  CALIFORNIA  305 


"Q.  "Who  was  the  chairman  of  that  meeting? 

"A.  Peter  Hyun. 

"Q.  Who  is  he? 

"A.  Peter  Hyun  is  a  Korean,  very  active  on  the  Los  Angeles  Com- 
mittee for  the  Protection  of  the  Foreign  Born.  He  is  a  brother  of 
David  Hyun,  a  Korean  architect,  who  is  under  deportation  proceedings 
at  the  present  time,  or  is  appealing  his  deportation. 

"Q.  On  October  3,  1951,  did  you  attend  an  ASP  Science  and  Edu- 
cation Division  meeting  at  1007  Heliotrope  Street,  the  residence  of 
Richard  Hawthorne? 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  Was  the  speaker  on  that  occasion  John  Howard  Lawson? 

"A.  Yes,  that  is  correct. 

"Q.  Were  there  some  students  present  from  the  Los  Angeles  City 
College? 

"A.  Yes.  It  was  primarily  a  student  group. 

"Q.  About  how  many  were  present? 

1 '  A.  Between  45  and  50.  As  I  understand,  or  as  I  was  given  to  under- 
stand, Richard  Hawthorne  was  a  student  at  L.  A.  City  College  also. 

"Q.  On  October  19,  1951,  did  you  attend  an  ASP  Medical  Division 
Executive  Board  meeting  ? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  At  921  South  Sierra  Bonita  Street,  the  residence  of  Dr.  Milton  Z. 
London  ? 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  Was  Dr.  Jack  Flasher  one  of  the  speakers? 

"A.  Yes,  he  was  the  main  speaker. 

"Q.  At  that  meeting  was  there  a  discussion  concerning  the  formation 
of  a  new  group  within  ASP  to  be  composed  entirely  of  doctors  ? 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  On  October  30,  1951,  did  you  attend  an  ASP  Medical  Division 
Executive  Board  meeting  at  7410  Sunset  Boulevard  ? 

' '  A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  Was  the  chairman  on  that  occasion  Dr.  Marvin  Sure? 

"A.  Yes,  sir. 

"Q.  Did  the  speakers  include  Dr.  Max  Schoen  and  Dr.  Milton  Z. 
London  ? 

1 '  A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  On  October  31,  1951,  did  you  attend  an  ASP  Council  general 
membership  meeting  in  Stanley  Hall,  1057  North  Stanley  Avenue  ? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  Was  the  chairman  of  that  meeting  Dr.  P.  Price  Cobbs? 

"A.  That  is  correct. 


306  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

"Q.  Did  the  speakers  include  Herbert  Biberman  and  Dr.  Max  Schoen? 

"A.  Yes. 

' '  Q.  And  Edward  Biberman  ? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  And  Martin  Hall? 

"A.  Yes. 

' '  Q.  Stephen  Fritchman  ? 

"A.  Yes,  that  is  correct. 

"Q.  On  November  25,  1951,  did  you  attend  an  ASP  party  at  7410 
Sunset  Boulevard  ? 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  Was  that  for  the  purpose  of  raising  funds? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  About  35  to  50  people  were  present? 

"A.  Correct. 

"Q.  On  November  30,  1951,  did  you  attend  a  meeting  of  the  Equal 
Rights  Congress  at  933  South  Foster  Drive,  the  residence  of  Louis 
and  Kose  Rosenberg? 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  Was  Mr.  Howland  Chamberlain  the  speaker  on  that  occasion? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  On  December  1,  1951,  did  you  attend  an  ASP  Science  and 
Education  Division  meeting  at  858  North  Alexandria  Street  in  Los 
Angeles  ? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  The  residence  of  Pearl  Schumann? 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  What  was  the  purpose  of  that  meeting? 

' '  A.  Fund  raising. 

"Q.  A  cocktail  party,  wasn't  it? 

"A.  Correct,  yes. 

"Q.  On  December  7,  1951,  did  you  attend  a  Medical  Division  ASP 
meeting  at  830  North  Melrose  Hill? 

"A.  Yes.  That  was  the  Executive  Board  of  the  Medical  Division. 

"Q.  At  the  residence  of  Dr.  Jack  Flasher? 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  Was  Dr.  Marvin  Sure  present? 

"A.  Yes,  he  was. 

"Q.  Was  Dr.  Max  Schoen  present? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  Was  the  Director  of  the  Community  Medical  Center,  Mr.  Ken 
Hartford,  present? 

"A.  Yes.  He  was  one  of  the  speakers. 


UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  307 

"Q.  Was  Dr.  Murray  Abowitz  present? 

"A.  Yes.  He  spoke  also. 

"Q.  On  the  12th  day  of  December,  1951,  did  you  attend  a  Civil 
Rights  Congress  meeting  at  the  Kadimah  Temple,  8056  West  Melrose 
Avenue,  Los  Angeles? 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  Who  was  the  chairman  on  that  occasion? 

' '  A.  Marguerite  Robinson,  the  executive  secretary  of  the  Civil  Rights 
Coyigress. 

"Q.  Did  the  speakers  include  Herman  Porter  and  Rabbi  Franklin 
Cohn? 

"A.  That  is  right. 

"Q.  Were  there  about  150  people  present? 

"A.  I  estimate  between  150  and  175. 

"Q.  On  December  17,  1951,  did  you  attend  a  Science  and  Educa- 
tion Division  meeting  of  ASP  at  845  North  Heliotrope  Avenue  ? 

"A.  Yes,  I  did. 

"Q.  Was  that  a  residence? 

"A.  Yes,  it  was.  It  was  in  an  apartment  of  one  of  the  students 
of  L.  A.  City  College. 

"Q.  Did  you,  on  the  11th  day  of  January,  1952,  attend  a  meeting 
of  the  Executive  Board  of  the  Medical  Division  of  ASP  at  7410 
Sunset  Boulevard? 

"A.  Yes,  that  is  correct. 

"Q.  Was  the  chairman  Dr.  Max  Schoen? 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  Did  the  speakers  on  that  occasion  include  Dr.  Murray  Abowitz? 

"A.  Right. 

"Q.  And  Ken  Hartford,  the  Director  of  the  Community  Medical 
Center! 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  And  Eugenia  Wolfson? 

"A.  That  is  correct,  yes. 

"Q.  And  Sarajo  Lord  also? 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  Did  you,  on  the  20th  day  of  January,  1952,  attend  a  meeting  of 
the  Medical  Division  of  the  ASP  at  109  North  Highland  Avenue,  which 
is  the  residence  of  Dr.  Morris  Feder  ? 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

"  Q.  On  that  occasion  was  the  chairman  Dr.  Max  Schoen  ? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  Did  the  speakers  include  Dr.  Alexander  Pennes? 

"A.  Yes. 


308  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN  CALIFORNIA 

"Q.  Dr.  Gordon  Rosenblum? 

"A.  Right. 

"Q.  Dr.  Frederick  Reynolds? 

"A.  Correct. 

"Q.  Jack  Tenner? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  And  Rabbi  Franklin  Conn? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  What  was  the  main  topic  of  conversation  at  that  particular 
meeting,  if  you  know? 

"A.  May  I  refer  to  my  complete  report,  Mr.  Combs,  please? 

"Q.  Yes. 

"A.  That  was  January  20th ? 

"Q.  Yes. 

"A.  That  was  during  the  time  when  the  subpenas  had  been  issued  on 
the  Un-American  Activities  Committee  hearings,  the  House  committee. 
The  purpose  of  that  meeting  was  to  formulate  their  plan  for  a  program 
of  protest  against  the  Cedars  of  Lebanon  Hospital. 

"Q.  That  was  because  of  the  dismissal  of  the  three  staff  members? 

' '  A.  That  is  right.  Dr.  Alexander  Pennes,  Dr.  Richard  Lippman  and 
Dr.  Murray  Abowitz  had  been  dropped  from  the  staff  of  Cedars  hos- 
pital. They  met  at  this  home  of  Dr.  Morris  Feder  for  the  purpose  of 
formulating  plans  to  try  to  force  a  reinstatement  of  these  three  doctors. 
It  was  to  be  a  big  program  of  action,  propaganda  wise,  too.  Do  you  want 
to  go  into  the  Gelhorn  letter  at  this  time? 

"Q.  "Was  that  discussed  in  your  presence  and  hearing  during  the 
course  of  the  meeting  at  any  time?  Incidentally,  was  this  an  evening 
meeting  ? 

"A.  Yes,  it  was  at  8.30  p.m. 

"Q.  About  how   many   people  were   present? 

"A.  From  50  to  60. 

"Q.  At  any  time  in  your  hearing  was  there  a  discussion  about 
getting  some  letters  from  influential  people? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  To  be  transmitted  to  the  Cedars  of  Lebanon  Hospital,  inter- 
ceding on  behalf  of  the  three  staff  members  who  had  been  discharged? 

"A.  That  is  right.  Dr.  Schoen  discussed  it.  He  made  the  announce- 
ment that  Joliot  Curie  and  a  professor  in  Stockholm,  Sweden,  whose 
name  I  don't  know,  were  intending  and  had  promised  to  file  protests 
with  the  United  Nations  on  the  dismissal,  and  Professor  Gelhorn 
had  promised  to  register  official  protest  regarding  the  dismissal  of 
Doctors   Abowitz,   Lippman  and   Pennes. 

"Q.  Who  was  Professor  Gelhorn,  do  you  know? 


UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN  CALIFORNIA  309 

"A.  I  don't  know,  sir. 

"Q.  Can  you  identify  Professor  Joliot  Curie? 

"A.  It  is  my  understanding  that  he  was  one  of  the  leaders  of  the 
Communist  Party  in  France  at  that  time. 

"Q.  Do  you  know  whether  or  not  such  letters  were  ever  actually 
received  ? 

"A.  That  I  don't  know  of  my  own  knowledge. 

"Q.  You  only  heard  discussion? 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  Of  the  intent  to  get  them? 

"A.  That  is  correct,  yes. 

"Q.  Did  you,  on  the  first  day  of  February,  1952,  attend  a  meeting 
of  the  Executive  Board  of  the  Medical  Division  of  the  Arts,  Sciences 
and  Professions  Council  at  535J  North  Spaulding  Street,  Los  Angeles, 
which  was  the  residence  of  Dr.  Max  Schoen? 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  Who  was  the  chairman  of  that  meeting? 

"A.  Dr.  Schoen. 

"Q.  Was  that  an  evening  meeting  also? 

"A.  Yes,  it  was. 

"Q.  Was  Mr.  Kenneth  Hartford,  the  director  of  the  Community 
Medical  Center,  present  on  that  occasion? 

"A.  Yes,  he  was  present  and  he  was  a  speaker  at  the  meeting. 

"Q.  Was  that  also  in  connection  with  the  effort  to  reinstate  the 
three  discharged  staff  members  at  Cedars  of  Lebanon? 

"A.  Correct,  and  also  the  action  to  be  taken  regarding  the  subpoenas 
for  the  House  Un-American  Activities  Committee  hearings. 

"Q.  On  the  twelfth  of  February,  1952,  did  you  attend  a  meeting  called 
the  Citizens  Committee  to  Preserve  American  Freedom  at  the  Arlington 
Theater,  2517  West  Washington  Boulevard,  Los  Angeles? 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  Was  the  chairman  of  that  meeting  Dorothy  Marshall? 

"A.  She  was  co-chairman.  There  were  two,  Dorothy  Marshall  and 
Dr.  William  Atkinson. 

"Q.  Can  you  identify  Dorothy  Marshall? 

"A.  Yes.  She  is  president  of  the  Women  for  Legislative  Action  Com- 
mittee. Her  husband  is  attorney  Daniel  G.  Marshall. 

"Q.  Was  one  of  the  speakers  Dr.  Frederick  Reynolds? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  And  another  Sam  Houston  Allen? 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  And  another  Averill  Berman? 

"A.  Correct. 


310  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN  CALIFORNIA 

Q.  About  how  many  people  attended  that  meeting? 

A.  There  were  between  seven  and  eight  hundred  people  there. 

That  was  an  evening  meeting? 
A.  That  is  correct,  yes. 

Q.  On  the  eighteenth  day  of  February,  1952,  did  you  attend  a  meet- 
ing of  the  Executive  Board  of  the  Medical  Division  of  the  Arts,  Sciences 
and  Professions  Council  at  830  North  Melrose  Hill,  which  was  the  resi- 
dence of  Dr.  Jack  Flasher  ? 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  Was  Dr.  Marvin  Sure  the  chairman  of  the  meeting  on  that 
occasion  ? 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  Did  the  speakers  include  Dr.  Milton  Z.  London  and  Dr.  Max 
Schoen  ? 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  That  was  also  regarding  the  discharge  of  the  three  staff  mem- 
bers from  Cedars  of  Lebanon  Hospital? 

"A.  Yes.  They  were  talking  about  the  proposed  meeting.  Joe  Joseph, 
the  national  director  of  the  Arts,  Sciences  and  Professions  Council,  was 
to  come  to  Los  Angeles  from  New  York.  They  were  to  have  a  big 
meeting.  We  were  discussing  the  program  and  what-have-you  if  Joe 
Joseph  came  and  if  it  were  held  at  a  later  date. 

"Q.  Did  he  subsequently  come  to  a  meeting? 

"A.  Oh,  yes. 

"Q.  And  which  you  attended? 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  At  all  of  the  meetings  of  the  ASP  did  you  attend  in  your  ca- 
pacity as  a  member  of  the  board? 

"A.  I  considered  myself  such,  yes. 

"Q.  In  other  words,  whenever — 

"A.  I  was  notified  officially. 

"Q.  As  a  board  member? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  There  were  meetings  of  the  Executive  Board  of  the  Medical 
Division  of  ASP  ? 

"A.  That  is  correct.  I  think  the  committee  has  the  announcement 
of  my 

"Q.  Yes,  we  have  it  and  will  introduce  documents  as  exhibits  later. 
On  the  twenty-fifth  of  February,  1952,  did  you  attend  a  meeting  at 
Larchmont  Hall  ? 

"A.  118. 

"Q.  Thank  you.  At  118  North  Larchmont  Boulevard  in  Los  Angeles, 
held  by  the  Committee  for  Medical  Freedom? 

"A.  Yes. 


UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  311 

"Q.  On  that  occasion  was  Dr.  Alexander  Pemies  one  of  the  speakers? 

"A.  Yes,  he  was. 

"Q.  Was  Dr.  Murray  Abowitz  another  one? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  Was  Dr.  Richard  Lippinan  another? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  That  was  regarding  the  Cedars  of  Lebanon  Hospital? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  About  how  many  people  attended  that  meeting? 

"A.  Between  five  and  six  hundred. 

"Q.  On  the  twenty-seventh  clay  of  February,  1952,  did  you  attend 
a  meeting  of  the  Medical  Division  of  ASP  at  109  North  Highland 
Avenue  at  the  residence  of  Dr.  Morris  Feder? 

"A.  That  is  correct,  yes. 

"Q.  Were  Dr.  Murray  Abowitz  and  Sarajo  Lord  co-chairmen  of  that 
meeting  ? 

"A.  That  is  correct,  yes,  sir. 

"Q.  Did  the  speakers  include  Joe  Joseph,  the  national  director  of 
the  National  Arts,  Sciences  and  Professions  Council  f 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  And  Dr.  Murray  Abowitz? 

"A.  That  is  correct,  yes. 

"Q.  Frankly,  I  don't  know  whether  it  was  or  was  not  from  memory, 
but  was  that  the  meeting  at  which  there  was  some  discussion  about 
making  mass  contacts,  that  is,  contacts  with  non-Communist  masses 
through  the  medium  of  organizations  other  than  ASP? 

"A.  That  is  correct,  yes. 

"Q.  Would  you  read  from  your  report,  well,  not  necessarily  from 
your  report — you  may  read  from  it  if  you  wish  to,  but  describe  what 
happened  in  that  regard  ? 

"A.  This  is  as  near  a  quote  as  I  can  give  you,  Mr.  Combs.  Joe 
Joseph  was  speaking.  He  said  there  are  many  people  who  sympathize 
with  the  ASP  position  in  specific  crises,  but  are  not  ready  yet  to  accept 
the  entire  ASP  program.  For  these  people  we  have  established  sub- 
committees, such  as  the  Committee  to  Preserve  American  Freedom.  To- 
day it  has  undertaken  the  fight  for  the  reinstatement  of  the  three 
doctors  at  the  Cedars.  I  am  not  reflecting  on  the  activity  of  ASP 
members,  but  they  must  gradually  be  brought  to  accept  the  ASP 
over-all  program.  As  the  immediate  crisis  passes,  the  subcommittee 
will  evaporate,  but  ASP  will  continue  to  fight  for  the  democratic  way 
of  life. 

' '  Q.  That  statement  was  made  in  your  presence  ? 

"A.  Yes. 


312  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN  CALIFORNIA 

"Q.  You  took  notes. 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  During  the  meeting  or  immediately  after  the  meeting? 

"A.  Immediately  after. 

"Q.  On  the  third  day  of  April,  1952,  did  you  attend  an  Executive 
Board  meeting? 

"A.  March. 

"Q.  March,  I  beg  your  pardon — a  meeting  of  the  Medical  Division 
of  ASP  at  535J  North  Spaulding  Street,  Los  Angeles,  which  was  the 
residence  of  Dr.  Max  Schoen? 

"A.  Correct. 

' '  Q.  Was  the  chairman  on  that  occasion  Dr.  Marvin  Sure  ? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  The  speakers  included  Dr.  P.  Price  Cobbs? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  And  the  Director  of  the  Community  Medical  Center,  Mr.  Ken 
Hartford? 

"A.  Correct. 

"Q.  Dr.  Max  Schoen? 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  On  March  14th,  Mrs.  Drader,  did  you  attend  a  meeting  of  the 
Medical  Division  of  the  ASP,  7410  Sunset  Boulevard  ? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  Was  Dr.  Murray  Abowitz  chairman  of  that  meeting? 

"A.  That  is  correct,  yes,  sir. 

"Q.  Was  Dr.  P.  Price  Cobbs  one  of  the  speakers? 

' '  A.  Yes,  sir,  that  is  right. 

' '  Q.  He  was  the  principal  speaker,  was  he  not  ? 

"A.  Yes,  he  was. 

"Q.  On  the  eighteenth  of  April,  1952,  did  you  attend  a  meeting  of 
the  Medical  Division  Forum  of  ASP  at  Stanley  Hall  ? 

"A.  Correct. 

"Q.  1057  North  Stanley  Avenue,  Los  Angeles? 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

1 '  Q.  Were  the  co-chairmen  of  that  meeting  Dr.  Max  Schoen  and  Dr. 
Milton   Z.    London? 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  Did  the  speakers  include  Dr.  Francis  M.  Pottenger,  Jr.? 

1 '  A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  Was  it  a  meeting  actually  to  discuss  the  smog  problem? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  Was  that  what  it  was? 

"A.  Yes. 


UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  313 

"Q.  About  75  people  attended? 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  On  May  2,  1952,  did  you  attend  a  meeting  of  the  Executive 
Board  of  the  Medical  Division  of  ASP  at  7410  Sunset  Boulevard? 

"A.  Yes,  sir. 

"Q.  Was  that  meeting  chairmanned  by  Dr.  Murray  Abowitz? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  Were  the  speakers  Dr.  Max  Schoen? 

"A.  Correct. 

"Q.  Dr.  Murray  Korngold? 

"A.  Correct. 

"Q.  Saul  Matlin? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  And  Dr.  Murray  Abowitz,  among  others? 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  About  how  many  people  attended  that  Executive  Board  meet- 
ing? 

"A.  Ten. 

"Q.  At  your  executive  board  meetings,  Mrs.  Drader,  did  you  decide 
when  the  next  meeting  would  be  held? 

"A.  No. 

"Q.  The  next  meeting  of  the  board? 

"A.  Not  exactly. 

"Q.  How  were  you  notified? 

"A.  By  postcard  as  a  rule. 

"Q.  All  right. 

"A.  Either  typed  or  mimeographed. 

"Q.  On  the  fourth  day  of  May,  1952,  did  you  attend  a  function 
known  as  Constitutional  Bights  Dinner? 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  Sponsored  by  the  Arts,  Sciences  and  Professions  Council? 

"  A.  Yes. 

"Q.  Where  was  that  held? 

"A.  At  the  Hollywood  Athletic  Club,  I  believe  they  called  it  the 
Starlight  Room. 

"Q.  About  how  many  people  were  present? 

"A.  About  275  or  300,  as  I  remember  it. 

"Q.  Was  Rose  Waldron  chairman  of  that  meeting? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  Did  the  speakers  include  Sarajo  Lord? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  And  Dr.  P.  Price  Cobbs? 

"A.  Yes. 


314  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

"Q.  And  Gale  Sondergaard? 

"A.  Correct. 

"Q.  Adrian  Scott? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  Professor  Fowler  Harper? 

"A.  Correct. 

"Q.  And  during  the  course  of  the  meeting,  was  Mr.  William  Schnei- 
derman  identified? 

"A.  Yes,  he  was. 

' '  Q.  Was  he  there  with  his  wife  ? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  Who  was  Mr.  William  Schneiderman,  if  you  know? 

"A.  At  that  time,  as  I  understood  it,  he  was  the  leader  of  the  Com- 
munist Party  in  the  Los  Angeles  area.  It  was  during  the  Smith  Act 
trials.  He  was  one  of  them  under  indictment. 

"Q.  Was  he  one  of  the  defendants? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  With  him  was  a  man  named  Ben  Dobbs? 

"A.  That  is  right. 

"Q.  Who  was  he,  if  you  know? 

"A.  He  was  also  one  of  the  defendants  in  the  trial. 

"Q.  One  of  the  Communist  leaders? 

"A.  One  of  the  Communist  leaders. 

"Q.  Mr.  Schneiderman  and  Mr.  Dobbs  have  been  identified  many 
times  before  the  hearings  of  the  committee  for  the  past  15  years,  I  am 
sure.  When  they  were  introduced  what  happened,  if  anything? 

"A.  Dr.  P.  Price  Cobbs  introduced  them.  He  asked  them  to  please 
stand,  which  they  did.  There  was  not  only  an  ovation,  but  a  standing 
ovation  for  them.  There  was  quite  a  loud  reception. 

"Q.  Do  your  notes  of  that  meeting  indicate  who  the  people  present 
were  and  who  were  known  to  you? 

"A.  I  have  a  list  of  the  ones  that  I  recognized,  or  who  were  intro- 
duced. 

"Q.  May  I  see  the  report,  please? 

"A.  Yes,  sir.  (Handing  document  to  Counsel).  They  are  the  per- 
sons present. 

"Q.  Did  you  send  us  a  copy  of  this  report? 

"A.  Yes,  sir,  that  I  did. 

"Q.  You  actually  saw  each  one  of  these  people? 

"A.  Yes,  I  did. 

"Q.  They  were  either  introduced  or  they  were  known  to  you? 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  Immediately  after  the  meeting  you  made  these  notations? 

"A.  Yes,  sir. 


UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  315 

"Q.  In  conformity  with  your  regular  practice  which  you  had  adopted 
in  the  attendance  of  all  of  these  functions  ? 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

' '  Q.  The  list  is  as  follows :  Dr.  P.  Price  Cobbs,  Gale  Sondergaard, 
Biberman,  Herbert  Biberman,  Edward  Biberman,  Sonja  Dahl  Biber- 
man,  Sarajo  Lord,  Helen  Olair,  Rose  Waldron,  Adrian  Scott,  Paul 
Jarrico,  Professor  Fowler  Harper,  Dr.  Golstein.  Do  you  know  his  first 
name? 

"A.  No,  I  don't.  But  he  was  introduced  as  a  professor  at  one  of  the 
universities.  I  believe  it  was  Cal-Tech. 

1 '  Q.  You  believe  it  was  Cal-Tech  ? 

"A.  Yes. 

'  Q.  You  are  not  positive  ? 
A.  I  am  not  positive. 

"Q.  Mr.  Jack  Tenner,  William  Schneiderman,  Mrs.  William  Schnei- 
derman,  Ben  Dobbs,  A.  L.  Wirin,  Ben  Margolis,  Norman  Leonard, 
Charles  Katz,  Marguerite  Robinson,  Lee  Bachelis.  Is  that  the  same  Lee 
Bachelis  that  you  described  earlier  in  your  testimony  concerning  the 
Gotham  Restaurant  meeting  ? 

"A.  That  is  correct,  yes. 

"Q.  Dr.  Murray  Abowitz,  Eleanor  Bogigian  Abowitz.  Is  that  the 
wife  of  Dr.  Murray  Abowitz  ? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  Dr.  Marvin  Sure,  Jane  Grodzins  Sure,  Dr.  Sidney  Prince,  Dick 
Powell.  He  is  the  radio  writer  and  not  the  actor  ? 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  Mrs.  Sidney  Prince,  Dr.  Don  Watson,  Dr.  William  Atkinson, 
Dr.  Milton  Z.  London,  Dr.  Morris  Feder,  Mrs.  Morris  Feder,  Dr.  Saul 
Wolfson,  Dr.  Fred  Reynolds,  Ted  Gilien.  Who  was  Ted  Gilien? 

"A.  He  is  an  artist.  He  put  out  a  book  called  The  Price. 

"Q.  Did  he  ever  give  you  an  autographed  copy  of  the  book? 

"A.  I  purchased  it  and  he  autographed  it  for  me. 

"Q.  At  the  meeting? 

"A.  Not  at  this  particular  meeting,  it  was  at  a  subsequent  meeting. 

"Q.  Will  you  be  able  to  identify  that  meeting  when  we  come  to  it? 

"A.  We  have  passed  it,  sir.  It  was  the  Committee  for  the  Amalgama- 
tion. 

"Q.  I  remember.  It  was  the  amalgamation  of  the  two  musicians 
unions  ? 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  That  is  where  you  got  it? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  Did  you  turn  it  over  to  us? 


316  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

"A.  That  I  have  here,  sir.  Here  is  the  autographed  copy.  I  sent  the 
committee  another  copy,  but  it  was  not  autographed.  I  retained  the 
autographed  copy. 

"Q.  I  don't  intend  to  introduce  this,  but  it  is  entitled  'The  Price, 
Paintings  and  Drawings  by  Ted  Gilien,'  inscribed  to  'Jane  Dawson, 
for  a  better  world  for  all  of  us.  July,  1951.  Ted  Gilien.'  Jane  Dawson 
is  the  name  used  by  you  in  connection  with  your  membership  in  these 
organizations  ? 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  It  comprises  55  pages  of  pictures. 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

' '  Mr.  Combs :  I  will  introduce  the  copy  we  have  into  the  record  later, 
Senator  Burns. 

"Chairman  Burns:  All  right. 

"Q.  (By  Mr.  Combs)  :  Victor  Kilian  was  present? 

"A.  Yes,  he  was. 

"Q.  Mrs.  P.Price  Cobbs? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  And  Mrs.  Fowler  V.  Harper? 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  On  the  sixteenth  day  of  May,  1952,  did  you  attend  a  meeting  of 
the  Executive  Board,  Medical  Division,  ASP,  at  7410  Sunset  Boulevard 
at  which  Dr.  Murray  Abowitz  was  the  chairman? 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  Did  the  speakers  on  that  occasion  include  Mr.  Ronald  Sutton? 

"A.  Ronald  Sutton,  that  is  right. 

"Q.  Thank  you.  On  June  2,  1952,  did  you  attend  a  meeting  of  the 
Executive  Board  of  the  Medical  Division,  ASP,  at  7349  Pacific  View 
Drive,  at  the  residence  of  Dr.  Marvin  Sure  ? 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

"  Q.  In  what  community  is  that  address  located  ? 

"A.  It  is  in  the  hills  just  between  Glendale  and  Los  Angeles,  Out- 
post Drive,  but  his  business  is  in  Glendale. 

"Q.  Was  Dr.  Murray  Abowitz  chairman  on  that  occasion? 

"A.  Yes,  he  was. 

"Q.  Was  the  principal  speaker  the  director  of  the  Community  Medi- 
cal Center,  Mr.  Ken  Hartford  ? 

"A.  Right. 

"Q.  On  the  fourteenth  day  of  June,  1952,  did  you  attend  the  Equal 
Bights  Conference  at  the  Hotel  Alexandria,  sponsored  by  the  Arts, 
Sciences  and  Professions  Council,  at  which  the  chairman  was  Dr.  P. 
Price  Cobbs? 

"A.  That  is  correct. 


UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN  CALIFORNIA  317 

Q.  How  many  people  were  present  at  that  function,  approximately  ? 

A.  It  fluctuated  between  280  and  300. 

Q.  Was  it  an  evening  meeting  ? 

A.  It  was  all  day. 

Q.  Oh,  it  was? 

A.  On  a  Saturday.  Then  there  was  a  recess  for  dinner  and  they  came 
back  for  a  windup  rally  at  the  end. 

Q.  Did  the  speakers  include  Sarajo  Lord? 

A.  Correct. 

Q.  Dr.  Murray  Abowitz? 

A.  Yes. 

Q.  SaulMatlin? 

A.  Yes. 

Q.  Dr.  Murray  Korngold  ? 

A.  Correct. 

Q.  Ronald  Sutton? 

A.  Correct. 

Q.  Gene  Stone? 

A.  That  is  correct. 

Q.  Dr.  Max  Schoen  ?  ( 

A.  Correct. 

Q.  On  the  twenty-fourth  of  June,  1952,  did  you  attend  a  meeting  of 
the  Medical  Division,  ASP,  Committee  Against  Discrimination1! 

A.  That  is  correct. 

Q.  That  meeting  was  held  at  the  Community  Medical  Center? 

A.  Yes. 

Q.  1236  South  Lake  Street,  Los  Angeles  ? 

A.  That  is  correct. 

Q.  Was  the  chairman  Dr.  Max  Schoen? 

A.  That  is  correct,  yes,  sir. 

Q.  On  the  seventh  day  of  July,  1952,  did  you  attend  a  meeting  of 
the  Executive  Board,  Medical  Division,  ASP,  830  North  Melrose  Hill, 
residence  of  Dr.  Jack  Flasher  ? 

A.  Yes. 

Q.  Was  the  chairman  of  that  meeting  Dr.  Murray  Abowitz  ? 

A.  Correct. 

Q.  Was  the  speaker  Dr.  Max  Schoen  ? 

A.  That  is  correct. 

Q.  On  the  eighth  day  of  July,  1952,  the  following  day,  did  you  at- 
tend a  meeting  of  the  Medical  Division  Committee  Against  Discrimina- 
tion, ASP,  at  the  Community  Medical  Center,  1236  South  Lake  Street, 
Los  Angeles? 

"A.  That  is  correct,  yes. 

"Q.  Was  the  chairman  of  that  meeting  Dr.  Max  Schoen? 


318  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

"A.  That  is  correct,  yes. 

"Q.  On  the  twenty-second  day  of  July,  1952,  did  you  attend  a  meet- 
ing of  the  Medical  Division,  Committee  Against  Discrimination,  ASP, 
at  the  Community  Medical  Center,  1236  South  Lake  Street,  Los  An- 
geles ? 

' '  A.  That  is  correct,  yes. 

"Q.  Was  the  chairman  Dr.  Max  Schoen? 

' '  A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  On  the  sixteenth  day  of  August,  1952,  did  you  attend  a  meeting 
of  the  Federation  for  the  Eepeal  of  the  Levering  Actl 

"  A.  Yes. 

' '  Q.  And  it  was  held  at  695  South  Catalina,  YWCA  Hall,  Los  Angeles  ? 

' '  A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  Was  the  chairman  of  that  meeting  Herb  Bisno? 

"A.  Yes. 

' '  Q.  Present  at  the  meeting  as  speakers  were  Dr.  Eason  Monroe  ? 

"A.  Correct. 

"Q.  Esther  Nasatir? 

"A.  Correct. 

"Q.  HanahBlum? 

"A.  Correct. 

"  Q.  And  Milnor  Alexander  ? 

' '  A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  On  the  nineteenth  day  of  August,  1952,  did  you  attend  a  meeting 
of  the  Medical  Division,  ASP,  Committee  Against  Discrimination,  at  the 
Community  Medical  Center,  1236  South  Lake  Street,  Los  Angeles? 

"A.  Correct. 

"Q.  Was  the  chairman  of  that  meeting  Dr.  Max  Schoen? 

' '  A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  On  the  twenty-second  day  of  August,  1952,  did  you  attend  a 
meeting  of  the  Medical  Division,  ASP,  7410  Sunset  Boulevard,  at  which 
the  chairman  of  the  meeting  was  Dr.  Murray  Abowitz? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  Did  the  speakers  on  that  occasion  include  Dr.  Richard  Lippman 
and  Dr.  Max  Schoen? 

"A.  Correct. 

"Q.  On  the  ninth  day  of  September,  1952,  did  you  attend  a  meeting 
of  the  Medical  Division,  ASP,  Committee  Against  Discrimination  at 
the  Community  Medical  Center,  1236  South  Lake  Street,  Los  Angeles, 
at  which  time  the  chairman  was  Dr.  Max  Schoen  ? 

"A.  Correct. 

"Q.  On  the  twenty-first  day  of  September,  1952,  did  you  attend  a 
meeting  of  the  Arts,  Sciences  and  Professions  Council,  Architecture 
and  Engineering  Division1! 


UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  319 

"A.  What  is  the  date  again?  Did  you  intentionally  skip  something? 

"Q.  I  did  it  inadvertently.  I  thank  you  very  much.  The  next  one 
should  have  been  September  21,  1952? 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  Was  that  a  meeting  of  the  Medical  Division,  ASP? 

"A.  Yes. 

"  Q.  At  7410  Sunset  Boulevard  ? 

"A.  Correct. 

"Q.  At  which  the  chairman  of  the  meeting  was  Dr.  Max  Schoen? 

"A.  Correct. 

"Q.  Now,  then,  on  October  17,  1952,  is  that  the  next  one  you  have? 

' '  A.  Yes,  that  is  the  next  one  I  have. 

"Q.  Did  you  attend  a  meeting  of  the  ASP  Architecture  and  Engi- 
neering Division  at  the  Park  Manor? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  607  South  Western  Avenue,  Los  Angeles? 

"A.  Yes,  that  is  correct. 

"  Q.  Was  the  chairman  Richard  Jampol  ? 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  Did  the  speakers  include  Dr.  P.  Price  Cobbs? 

"A.  Yes. 

1 '  Q.  And  Robert  Alexander  ? 

"A.  Correct. 

"  Q.  On  the  thirty-first  day  of  October,  1952,  did  you  attend  a  meet- 
ing of  the  Medical  Division  of  the  ASP  at  7410  Sunset  Boulevard  ? 

' '  A.  That  is  correct. 

' '  Q.  Was  the  chairman  Dr.  Max  Schoen  ? 

"A.  Yes. 

' '  Q.  Did  the  speakers  include  Dr.  Marvin  Sure  ? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  SaulMatlin? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  On  the  eleventh  day  of  November,  1952,  did  you  attend  a  meet- 
ing of  the  Medical  Division,  ASP,  Committee  Against  Discrimination 
at  the  Community  Medical  Center,  1236  South  Lake  Street,  Los 
Angeles  ? 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  Was  the  chairman  Dr.  Max  Schoen? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  On  the  fourteenth  day  of  November,  1952,  did  you  attend  a 
meeting  of  the  Sciences  and  Education  Division  of  the  ASP  at  7819 
Beverly  Boulevard,  Los  Angeles  ? 

"A.  That  is  correct. 


320  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN  CALIFORNIA 

"Q.  Was  the  chairman  Dr.  P.  Price  Cobbs? 

1 '  A.  Yes,  that  is  correct. 

' '  Q.  Did  the  speakers  include  Dr.  Frank  W.  Weymouth ? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  And  Dirk  J.  Struik? 

1 '  A.  That  is  correct. 

1 '  Q.  And  Dr.  Murray  Abowitz  ? 

"A.  Correct. 

"Q.  Do  you  know  anything  about  the  identity  of  Frank  W. 
Weymouth,  who  is  he  ? 

"A.  I  don't  know  too  much  about  Dr.  Frank  Weymouth.  He  was 
chairman  of  the  committee,  as  I  recall,  the  students — no,  that  is  Heist. 
Frank  Weymouth,  though,  has  been 

"Q.  Could  you  refer  to  your  file  index? 

"A.  Yes,  perhaps  I  could.  I  haven't  seen  him  at  too  many  meetings. 
He  was  active  to  a  slight  extent  in  the  Arts,  Sciences  and  Professions 
Council.  He  was  one  of  the  sponsors,  I  believe,  of  this  book,  The  Price. 

"Q.  Who  was  Dirk  J.  Struik,  if  you  know? 

"A.  He  was  professor  from  the  Massachusetts  Institute  of  Tech- 
nology. 

"Q.  Who  introduced  him  at  the  meeting? 

1 '  A.  He  was  introduced  by  Frank  Weymouth. 

"  Q.  About  how  many  people  were  present  on  that  occasion? 

"A.  Between  250  and  300. 

"  Q.  Was  it  an  evening  meeting  ? 

"A.  Yes,  it  was. 

"Q.  On  the  ninth  day  of  December,  1952,  did  you  attend  a  meeting 
of  the  Medical  Division,  ASP,  Committee  Against  Discrimination,  at 
the  Community  Medical  Center,  1236  South  Lake  Street,  Los  Angeles? 

"A.  That  is  correct,  yes. 

"Q.  Was  the  chairman  of  that  meeting  Dr.  Max  Schoen? 

"A.  That  is  correct,  yes. 

"Q.  On  the  twelfth  day  of  December,  1952,  did  you  attend  a  meet- 
ing of  the  Negro  Labor  Council? 

"A.  Correct. 

"Q.  At  4118  South  Central  Avenue,  Los  Angeles? 

"A.  Correct. 

"Q.  Was  the  chairman  of  the  meeting  Cleophus  Brown? 

"A.  Correct. 

' '  Q.  Do  you  know  who  he  is  ?  Do  you  know  anything  about  him  ? 

"A.  He  was  chairman  of  the  Negro  Labor  Council. 

"Q.  He  has  been  a  witness  before  our  committee  on  other  occasions. 

"A.  I  didn't  know  that. 


UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN  CALIFORNIA  321 


"Q.  Did  the  speakers  include  Tom  Creed? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  And  Frankie  Simms? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  And  others  that  you  have  named  in  your  report? 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

"  Q.  On  the  sixteenth  day  of  December,  1952,  did  you  attend  a  meet- 
ing of  the  Arts,  Sciences  and  Professions  Council,  Architecture  and 
Engineering  Division  Forum? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  I  have  no  indication  as  to  where  that  was  held. 

"A.  Oh,  dear. 

"Q.  Can  you  tell  me  by  referring  to  your  report? 

"A.  It  was  held  at  2936  West  8th  Street,  Channing  Hall,  which  is 
the  First  Unitarian  Church. 

"Q.  Were  the  chairmen  on  that  occasion  Francis  Dean  and  Bob 
Hogge  ? 

"A.  That  is  right. 

"Q.  Did  the  speakers  include  Frank  Wilkinson? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  And  Alvin  Wilder? 

"A.  Correct. 

"  Q.  Was  it  an  evening  meeting  ? 

"A.  Yes,  8:30  p.m. 

"Q.  Was  the  general  topic  of  discussion  'Alleged  Racial  Discrimina- 
tion in  Housing  ? ' 

' '  A.  Yes,  and  slum  clearance. 

"Q.  And  segregation  ? 

"A.  Yes. 

' '  Q.  About  how  many  people  attended  that  meeting  ? 

"A.  Between  60  and  70. 

"Q.  Did  you,  on  the  ninth  day  of  January,  1953,  attend  a  meeting 
of  the  Negro  Labor  Council,  at  4118  South  Central  Avenue,  Los 
Angeles  ? 

A.  That  is  correct,  yes. 

Q.  Was  the  chairman  on  that  occasion  Robert  Shannon  Robinson? 
A.  Correct.  He  is  deceased. 
Q.  He  is  now  deceased  ? 
;  A.  That  I  understand,  yes. 

Q.  What  was  the  purpose  of  that  meeting,  if  you  know? 
!A.  Well,  the  Los  Angeles  Committee  for  the  Protection  of  Foreign- 
Born  was  preparing  and  planning  a  conference  to  be  held  on  the 
seventh  of  February,  1953.  They  had  requested  that  all  of  the  various 
progressive  organizations  send  a  delegation.  The  purpose  of  the  meet- 


322  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

iug  was  the  council  business  meeting,  and  then  to  select  members  of 
the  Negro  Labor  Council  to  attend  this  conference  to  defend  the  rights 
of  the  foreign  born  as  representatives  of  the  Negro  Labor  Council. 

"Q.  Did  you  attend  that  meeting  because  of  your  membership  in 
the  ASP? 

"A.  Well,  I  had  become  involved  in  the  affairs  of  the  Negro  Labor 
Council  through  my  activities  in  the  ASP. 

"Q.  You  actually  joined  it,  didn't  you? 

"A.  Yes,  I  actually  joined  it  at  the  insistence  of  Dr.  Schoen. 

"Q.  Did  he  direct  you  to  become  a  member  of  the  Negro  Labor 
Council  f 

"A.  Yes.  It  was  at  one  of  the  meetings  of  the  Community  Medical 
Center,  the  ASP  Medical  Division  formed  a  subcommittee,  the  Com- 
mittee Against  Discrimination,  as  an  outcome  of  the  Equal  Eights  Con- 
ference at  the  Hotel  Alexandria.  At  one  of  the  meetings  of  the  Com- 
mittee Against  Discrimination,  held  at  the  Community  Medical  Center, 
Robert  Shannon  Robinson  came  as  guest  speaker.  He  was  also  a  mem- 
ber of  the  Executive  Board  of  the  ASP,  in  addition  to  being  chairman 
of  the  Negro  Labor  Council.  They  had  their  national  convention.  He 
came  to  report  on  the  activities  of  integrating  negro  personnel  into 
formerly  all-white  organizations.  He  suggested  it  would  give  a  big 
boost  to  the  Negro  Labor  Council  if  some  of  the  members  of  the  Arts, 
Sciences  and  Professions  Committee  Against  Discrimination  would 
come,  either  as  members  or  observers,  and  report  back  to  the  ASP 
committee  and  try  to  integrate  their  activities  to  help  the  negro  workers. 
Dr.  Max  Schoen  asked  me  if  I  would  join  and  attend. 

"Q.  Did  you  agree  to  do  that? 

"A.  I  agreed  to  do  that,  yes. 

"Q.  How  many  meetings  did  you  attend  as  a  member?  Do  you 
recall  ? 

"A.  The  meetings  of  the  Labor  Council f 

"Q.  Yes. 

"A.  About  six,  I  believe. 

"Q.  "Were  they  all  held  at  the  same  place? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  Why  didn't  you  continue  with  your  membership? 

' '  A.  Well,  having  to  go  down  there  rather  late  at  night,  it  wasn  't  so 
much  in  the  meetings,  but  leaving  in  order  to  get  back  to  my  home  I 
had  to  drive  through  some  rather  unsavory  neighborhoods.  I  just  felt 
uncomfortable  being  out  alone,  you  know,  in  the  industrial  area  in 
through  there,  that  I  had  to  travel  through. 

' '  Q.  Did  you  report  that  feeling  to  Dr.  Schoen  ? 

"A.  No,  I  didn't. 

"Q.  You  just  quit  going? 


UN-AMERICAN   ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  323 

"A.  I  just  quit  going. 

"Q.  Was  there  remonstrance  on  the  part  of  anybody  so  far  as  you 
were  concerned  because  you  elected  to  quit? 

"A.  No. 

"Q.  Have  you  submitted  your  actual  membership  card  in  the  Negro 
Lao  or  Council? 

' '  A.  No.  I  have  it  in  my  purse,  Mr.  Combs,  but  I  will  be  glad  to  give 
it  to  you. 

"Q.  Will  you  do  so,  please? 

"A.  I  will  have  no  more  need  for  it. 

"Q.  I  presume  not. 

"A.  This  is  the  Negro  Labor  Council  card.  Here  is  the  receipt. 

"Q.  Mrs.  Drader,  if  you  don't  mind,  if  you  want  to  keep  this  as  a 
memento  of  your  experience,  I  can  read  it  into  the  record,  because  it  is 
very  short. 

"A.  Fine. 

"  Q.  It  reads  as  follows :  '  National  Negro  Labor  Council,  410  Warren 
Street,  Room  214,  Temple  2-1732,  Detroit,  Michigan.  This  is  to  certify 
that  the  undersigned  has  agreed  to  the  program  and  principles  of  the 
N.  N.  L.  C — that  would  be  the  National  Negro  Labor  Council? 

' '  The  Witness :  That  is  right. 

"Mr.  Combs:  ' and  is  in  good  standing  for  the  current  year. 

Name :  Jane  Dawson. '  You  have  already  testified  about  your  use  of  that 
name? 

' '  The  Witness :  That  is  right. 

' '  Mr.  Combs :  '  Date  of  issue :  December  9,  1952. '  This  card  is  for  the 
year  1953.  Facsimile  signature  of  R.  Robinson,  Legal  Counsel,  Secre- 
tary 120,  and  the  facsimile  signature  of  the  National  Executive  Sec- 
retary, it  looks  like  Coleman  A.  Young. 

' '  The  Witness :  Yes. 

"Mr.  Combs :  The  seal  of  the  Negro  Labor  Council  is  stamped  in  gold 
on  the  face  of  the  card. 

"Q.  On  the  thirteenth  of  January,  1953,  Mrs.  Drader,  did  you  attend 
a  membership  meeting  of  the  ASP  at  Stanley  Hall,  1057  North  Stanley 
Avenue,  Los  Angeles  ? 
' '  A.  That  is  right. 

"Q.  Was  the  chairman  of  that  meeting  Dr.  P.  Price  Cobbs? 
"A.  Correct. 

"Q.  Was  one  of  the  speakers  Martin  Hall,  who  appeared  as  a  witness 
here  yesterday  or  the  day  before  ? 
"A.  That  is  right. 
"Q.  And  Harry  Carlisle? 
"A.  Yes. 


324  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN  CALIFORNIA 

1 '  Q.  Who  was  he,  if  you  know  ? 

"A.  I  believe  he  is  a  writer  by  occupation.  He  is  currently  on  a 
deportation  orders,  or  has  been  deported.  I  don't  know  the  current 
status  of  the  case.  He  was  under  deportation  proceedings  for  his  activi- 
ties as  a  Communist. 

"Q.  Was  Dr.  Max  Schoen  one  of  the  speakers? 

"A.  Yes. 

' '  Q.  It  was  an  evening  meeting  ? 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  On  the  sixteenth  of  January,  1953,  did  you  attend  a  meeting  of 
the  Medical  Division  of  the  ASP  at  1406  South  St.  Andrews  Place? 

"A.  Yes,  that  is  correct. 

"Q.  Was  that  a  residence? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  Of  James  R.  Cheatham? 

"A.  Correct. 

"  Q.  Was  the  chairman  of  the  meeting  Dr.  Max  Schoen  ? 

"A.  Correct. 

"Q.  Was  one  of  the  speakers  Dr.  Thomas  L.  Perry? 

"A.  Correct,  yes. 

"Q.  Did  you  attend  a  meeting  of  the  Negro  Labor  Council,  its  open 
house  party? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  On  the  eighteenth  of  January,  1953,  at  4118  South  Central 
Avenue,  Los  Angeles  ? 

"A.  That  is  correct.  That  was  a  Sunday  afternoon. 

"Q.  Attended  by  a  good  number  of  people,  between  150  and  200? 

"A.  It  was  a  fluctuating  crowd.  They  fluctuated  in  and  out.  It  was 
an  open  house  party. 

"Q.  All  afternoon  ? 

"A.  Yes. 

11 Q.  On  the  twentieth  of  January,  1953,  did  you  attend  a  meeting  of 
the  Medical  Division  Committee  Against  Discrimination,  ASP,  at  2148 
South  Hobart  Boulevard,  Apt.  2-B  ? 

"A.  Correct. 

"Q.  Was  the  chairman  of  that  meeting  Dr.  Max  Schoen? 

"A.  That  is  correct,  yes. 

"Q.  Was  the  topic  of  discussion,  or  chief  topic  of  discussion,  'Al- 
leged Discrimination  at  Permanente  and  Hollywood  Hospitals?' 

"A.  Yes,  and  a  case  of  discrimination  at  the  L.  A.  County  Hospital. 
Shall  we  go  into  this,  the  apartment  ? 

1 1 Q.  The  apartment  was  that  of  Rosalind  Smith  ? 

"A.  Yes.  She  is  a  registered  nurse. 


UN-AHEKICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFOENIA  325 

"Q.  On  the  seventh  of  February,  1953,  did  you  attend  a  meeting  of 
the  Los  Angeles  Committee  for  the  Protection  of  Foreign  Born? 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  At  607  South  Western  Avenue? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  At  Park  Manor? 

"A.  Correct. 

"Q.  Was  one  of  the  speakers  on  that  occasion  Esther  Shandler,  an 
attorney  ? 

"A.  That  is  correct,  yes. 

' '  Q.  On  February  10,  1953,  did  you  attend  a  meeting  of  the  Medical 
Division,  Committee  Against  Discrimination,  ASP,  at  the  CIO  Build- 
ing, 303-5851  Avalon  Boulevard,  Los  Angeles? 

"A.  Yes,  that  is  correct.  However,  there  was  a  little  difference  there 
in  that  it  was  the  Medical  Committee  Against  Discrimination  that  or- 
ganized the  meeting.  The  reason  for  holding  it  at  the  CIO  Building, 
they  were  integrating  leaders  of  some  of  the  labor  organizations  into 
their  activities,  anti-discrimination  activities. 

"Q.  That  was  the  reason  for  holding  it  at  that  particular  place? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  Which  apparently,  from  the  other  meetings,  was  a  little  bit  out 
of  order  ? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  The  chairman  of  that  meeting  was  Dr.  Max  Schoen? 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  The  subject  principally  discussed  was  discrimination  at  Per- 
manente  ? 

"A.  Yes;  the  policy  that  the  trade  unions  should  take  in  regard  to 
that. 

"Q.  On  the  twenty-sixth  of  February,  1953,  did  you  attend  a  meet- 
ing of  the  Medical  Division  of  ASP  and  the  Community  Medical  Center, 
a  joint  meeting? 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  That  was  held  at  the  Community  Medical  Center,  a  joint 
meeting? 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  That  was  held  at  the  Community  Medical  Center? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  At  1236  South  Lake  Street,  Los  Angeles? 

1 '  A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  On  the  seventeenth  of  March,  1953,  did  you  attend  a  meeting 
of  the  Arts,  Sciences  and  Professions  Council  Forum  at  Stanley  Hall, 
1057  North  Stanley  Avenue,  Los  Angeles  ? 


326  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

"A.  Correct. 

"Q.  Was  the  chairman  of  that  meeting  Martin  Hall? 

"A.  Correct. 

"Q.  Did  the  speakers  include  Harold  Orr? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  On  the  twelfth  day  of  April,  1953,  did  you  attend  a  meeting  at 
the  Madame  Severance  Room  at  the  First  Unitarian  Church,  2936  "West 
8th  Street,  Los  Angeles? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  Unitarian  Fellowship  for  Social  Justice? 

"A.  Correct. 

"Q.  Was  the  chairman  of  that  meeting  Dr.  Harold  Koppleman? 

"A.  Correct. 

"Q.  On  the  first  day  of  May,  1953,  did  you  attend  a  meeting  at  the 
First  Unitarian  Church  ? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  Was  the  speaker  Maude  Russell? 

"A.  Yes. 

' '  Q.  Was  that  a  meeting  of  the  Unitarian  Public  Forum  ? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  How  many  people  attended  that  meeting,  approximately? 

"A.  Between  600  and  700.  Stephen  Fritchman  was  the  chairman. 

"Q.  Was  it  an  evening  meeting? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  On  the  twentieth  of  May,  1953,  did  you  attend  a  general  mem- 
bership meeting  of  the  ASP  at  7410  Sunset  Boulevard,  Los  Angeles, 
at  which  time  the  chairman  was  Gene  Stone  and  the  speakers  included 
Dr.  P.  Price  Cobbs,  John  Howard  Lawson,  David  Hyun  and  Pauline 
Shindler  ? 

"A.  Correct. 

"Q.  On  the  seventh  day  of  June,  1953,  did  you  attend  a  meeting  at 
the  First  Unitarian  Church  at  which  the  chairman  was  Dr.  Harold 
Koppleman  and  the  principal  speaker  was  Anna  Louise  Strong  ? 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

' '  Q.  About  how  many  people  attended  that  meeting  ? 

"A.  Between  350  and  400. 

"Q.  On  the  twenty -first  day  of  June,  1953,  did  you  attend  a  Paul 
Robeson  recital  at  the  First  Unitarian  Church? 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  And  how  many  people  attended  that  affair? 

"A.  There  were  twelve  to  thirteen  hundred.  The  main  recital  was 
in  the  auditorium  of  the  church,  the  big  auditorium.  There  was  such  a 
crowd  that  they  had  speakers  connected  into  the  Madame  Severance 


UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  327 

Room  and  Channing  Hall.  There  were  still  people  in  the  little  patio  who 
could  not  get  into  those  rooms. 

"Q.  On  the  twenty-fifth  of  June,  1953,  did  }^ou  attend  a  meeting 
of  the  Los  Angeles  Committee  for  the  Protection  of  Foreign  Born  at  the 
Hotel  Clark,  Los  Angeles? 

"Q.  Did  the  speakers  include  Rose  Chernin,  mentioned  by  one  of  the 
witnesses  this  morning? 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  Mary  Hyun? 

"A.  Correct. 

"Q.  Pauline  Epstein? 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  Stanley  Nowak? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  On  August  16,  1953,  did  you  attend  a  meeting  at  the  First 
Unitarian  Church? 

"A.  I  was  at  the  Unitarian  Church.  It  was  not  exactly  a  meeting. 
It  was  Mr.  Fritchman's  church  service,  but  the  title  of  the  sermon 
was,  'Expediency  or  Principle,'  which  was  an  attack  on  the  House  Un- 
American  Activities  Committee. 

"Q.  How  many  people  attended  that  meeting? 

"A.  About  eight  or  nine  hundred. 

"Q.  On  August  23,  1953,  did  you  attend  a  meeting  at  the  First  Uni- 
tarian Church? 

"A.  Yes.  That  was  the  same  meeting.  It  was  their  morning  church 
service. 

"Q.  Was  the  speaker  Dr.  Harry  Steinmetz? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  Is  he  the  Dr.  Harry  Steinmetz  who  was  expelled  from  San 
Diego  State  College? 

"A.  He  was  from  San  Diego  State  College  at  that  time. 

"Q.  You  don't  know  about  it? 

"A.  I  don't  know  whether  he  was  expelled  or  not. 

"Q.  On  September  12,  1953,  did  you  attend  a  meeting  of  the  Civil 
Rights  Congress  in  Los  Angeles? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  At  1251  South  St.  Andrews  Place? 

"A.  Correct. 

"Q.  Was  the  chairman  Reuben  Borough? 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  Did  the  speakers  include  Aubrey  Grossman  .' 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  Do  you  know  who  he  is? 


328  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN  CALIFORNIA 

"A.  He  was  introduced  as  a  San  Francisco  attorney. 

"Q.  You  don't  know  anything  more  about  him? 

"A.  No,  I  don't. 

"Q.  Marguerite  Robinson? 

"A.  Yes.  She  was  one  of  the  speakers. 

"Q.  You  have  already  described  her,  have  you  not? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  About  how  many  people  attended  that  meeting? 

"A.  Seventy-five  or  so. 

"Q.  What  was  the  purpose  of  it? 

"A.  It  was  a  conference  to  save  Wells. 

"Q.  To  obtain  a  pardon  for  Wesley  Robert  Wells,  who  was  then 
under  death  sentence  at  San  Quentin  Penitentiary? 

"A.  Correct. 

' '  Mr.  Combs :  Aubrey  Grossman,  Mr.  Chairman,  has  appeared  before 
the  committee.  He  has  proclaimed  himself  to  be  a  member  of  the  Com- 
munist Party  of  long  standing. 

"Q.  On  the  eighteenth  day  of  September,  1953,  did  you,  at  Chan- 
ning  Hall,  which  is  at  the  First  Unitarian  Church,  attend  a  meeting 
of  the  Southern  California  Peace  Crusaded 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  Were  the  speakers  Maude  Russell  and  Peter  Hyun? 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  On  the  twenty -ninth  day  of  September,  1953,  did  you  attend 
a  meeting  of  the  Los  Angeles  Committee  for  the  Protection  of  Foreign 
Born? 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

"  Q.  At  607  South  Western  Avenue,  Park  Manor  ? 

"A.  Correct. 

"Q.  Was  the  chairman  Rose  Chernin? 

"A.  Correct. 

"Q.  Was  it  regarding  arranging  for  David  Hyun's  release  on  bail? 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  Because  he  was  under  deportation  proceedings? 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  On  the  second  day  of  October,  1953,  did  you  attend  a  mass  meet- 
ing of  the  Civil  Rights  Congress? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  At  the  Embassy  Auditorium? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  For  the  announced  purpose  of  saving  Robert  Wesley  Wells? 

"A.  That  is  correct.  That  is  where  they  brought  William  L.  Patter- 
son from  New  York. 


UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN  CALIFORNIA  329 

"Q.  Who  is  William  L.  Patterson? 

"A.  He  was  introduced  as  National  Director  of  the  Civil  Rights 
Congress. 

" Q.  He  came  out  from  New  York,  you  say  ? 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  Did  he  speak? 

"A.  Correct. 

"Q.  Do  you  know  who  introduced  him? 

"A.  I  believe  James  Daugherty  was  the  man  who  introduced  him. 
I  could  refer  to  my  detailed  reports. 

"Q.  How  many  people  attended? 

"A.  Between  seven  and  eight  hundred. 

' '  Q.  Was  it  an  evening  meeting  ? 

"A.  Yes. 

' '  Q.  On  October  5,  1953,  did  you  attend  a  meeting  of  the  Los  Angeles 
Committee  to  Get  Justice  for  the  Rosenoergsf 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  Who  were  the  Rosenbergs? 

"A.  Ethel  and  Julius  Rosenberg,  the  convicted  atomic  spies. 

"Q.  That  was  held  at  the  First  Unitarian  Church? 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  The  chairman  was  Reid  Robinson? 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  The  speakers  included  Benjamin  Dreyfus? 

"A.  Correct. 

"Q.  William  L.  Patterson? 

"A.  Correct. 

"Q.  Janet  Stephenson? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  On  the  sixteenth  of  October,  1953,  did  you  attend  a  meeting  of 
the  Unitarian  Public  Forum  at  the  Unitarian  Church? 

"A.  Yes. 

' '  Q.  Was  the  speaker  Carey  McWilliams  ? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  The  subject  was,  'The  Witch  Hunt:  an  Interim  Report?' 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  How  many  people  attended  that  meeting? 

"A.  Between  eight  and  nine  hundred.  Mr.  Fritchman  was  the  chair- 
man. 

"Q.  That  is  the  Reverend  Stephen  Fritchman,  who  is  the  pastor  of 
that  church? 

"A.  Yes. 


330  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN  CALIFORNIA 

"  Q.  On  the  seventeenth  day  of  October,  1953,  did  you  attend  a  meet- 
ing of  an  organization  known  as  Women  for  Legislative  Action  Con- 
ference? 

"A.  Yes,  I  did. 

"Q.  Where  was  that  held? 

"A.  At  the  Statler  Hotel. 

"Q.  In  Los  Angeles? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  Who  were  the  chairmen  of  that  meeting. 

"A.  Dorothy  Marshall,  whom  I  have  previously  mentioned,  and 
Sylvia  Miller. 

"Q.  Would  you  return  to  ATour  report  of  that  particular  meeting, 
please. 

"A.  Yes,  I  will. 

"Q.  Referring  to  this  report,  Mrs.  Drader,  the  meeting  started  at 
11  o'clock  p.m.? 

"A.  Yes. 

' '  Q.  Was  it  attended  by  between  250  and  300  people  ? 

"A.  Yes. 

"  Q.  The  chairman  was  Dorothy  Marshall,  wife  of  Daniel  G.  Marshall, 
the  attorney,  as  you  have  heretofore  testified? 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  Was  Dorothy  Healey  present? 

"A.  Yes,  she  was. 

"Q.  Did  she  participate  in  the  proceedings? 

"A.  To  a  slight  extent.  In  that  meeting  John  Despol  objected  to  her 
presence. 

"Q.  Who  is  John  Despol? 

"A.  He  is  affiliated  with  the  CIO. 

"Q.  He  is  an  official  in  the  CIO? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  Did  he  object  to  her  presence? 

"A.  He  objected  to  her  presence. 

"Q.  For  what  reason? 

"A.  Because  she  was  one  of  the  convicted  Communists.  I  believe 
that  was  after  the  conviction.  Pending  their  appeal  to  the  Supreme 
Court  she  was  out  on  bail.  He  objected  to  the  presence  of  a  known  and 
convicted  Communist  in  the  meeting.  There  was  quite  a  discussion  be- 
tween Mr.  Despol  and  Mrs.  Marshall  concerning  Mrs.  Healey 's  pres- 
ence. It  was  stated  that  she  was  as  welcome  as  anyone,  that  they  did 
not  care  what  anyone's  political  belief  was,  that  if  they  were  inter- 
ested in  the  Conference  for  Women's  Legislative  Action,  they  were 
welcome  to  stay.  They  took  a  vote  on  it.  Mr.  Despol  was  the  only  one 
who  voted  for  her  to  leave,  so  he  left. 


UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA  331 

' '  Q.  The  rest  voted  for  her  to  stay,  so  he  walked  out  ? 

"A.  He  left. 

' '  Chairman  Burns :  Mr.  Counsel,  I  would  like  to  have  it  clear  in  the 
record  that  there  is  no  way  that  John  Despol  could  be  considered  to  be 
sympathetic  to  Communism  here. 

"Q.   (By  Mr.  Combs)  :  He  indicated  that  by  his  actions? 

"A.  He  indicated  it  definitely  there. 

"Q.  Was  Leo  Branton,  an  attorney,  present  at  that  meeting? 

"A.  Yes,  he  was. 

' '  Q.  Did  he  participate  in  the  discussions  ? 

"A.  I  believe  he  did,  yes.  I  think  my  report  would  state  that  he  did. 
Yes,  he  was  one  of  the  speakers  on  one  of  the  panels,  the  civil  liberties 
panel. 

"Q.  There  is  a  long  list  of  names,  and  I  won't  take  the  time  to  read 
them  into  the  record  now  because  it  is  much  too  long.  Are  these  people 
you  recognized  there  or  heard  introduced? 

"A.  Either  that,  or  were  introduced  as  panel  participants.  I  think 
I  have  the  report  broken  down  as  to  those  who  participated  in  the 
panels. 

"Q.  Yes,  you  have. 

"A.  At  the  latter  part  of  it  are  the  ones  I  recognized  as  being  pres- 
ent. Yes,  here  are  the  people  I  either  recognized  or  who  were  introduced 
as  being  present.  There  is  a  list  of  physical  exhibits,  printed  and  writ- 
ten material  that  you  attached  to  your  original  report  and  which  you 
sent  to  us  ? 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  They  are  enumerated  in  your  copy? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  The  originals  are  in  our  possession? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  In  addition  to  that,  as  I  understand  it,  there  was  distributed 
for  the  participants  at  that  particular  function  what  is  known  as  a 
'Field  Kit'? 

''A.  Yes. 

"Q.  Will  you  describe  that  from  memory,  what  it  consisted  of? 

"A.  It  was  a  brown  envelope  similar  to  those  you  have  in  front  of 
you,  not  quite  so  large.  It  consisted  of  a  program  which  was  quite  nicely 
bound  and  printed,  with  literature  from  various  organizations  that 
they  had  inserted.  There  was  a  Handbill  from  the  Committer  for  tin 
Protection  of  the  Foreign  Born,  and  several  others  that  I  would  have 
to  see.  I  have  them  listed. 

"Q.  Never  mind.  You  also  sent  them  into  us  with  your  report? 

"A.  Absolutely. 


332  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN  CALIFORNIA 

"Q.  On  the  twentieth  day  of  November,  1953,  did  you  attend  a 
meeting  of  the  ASP  at  the  Embassy  Auditorium  in  Los  Angeles  ? 

"A.  That  is  correct,  yes. 

"Q.  That  was  regarding  the  motion  picture,  'Salt  of  the  Earth?' 

"A.  Mainly,  yes. 

' '  Q.  How  many  people  attended  that  meeting  ? 

"A.  Between  12  and  13  hundred  people  were  present. 

"Q.  On  November  30,  1953,  did  you  attend  a  meeting  of  the  Los 
Angeles  Committee  for  the  Protection  of  the  Foreign  Born? 

"A.  Yes,  I  did. 

"Q.  That  was  held  at  607  Southwestern  Avenue,  at  the  Park  Manor? 

"A.  Correct. 

"Q.  That  was  a  welcome  for  David  Hyun? 

"A.  Yes.  He  had  just  been  released  from  Terminal  Island  on  bail. 

"Q.  That  was  attended  by  250  to  300  people? 

"A.  Correct. 

"Q.  "We  are  now  in  1954.  On  January  10,  1954,  did  you  attend  a 
meeting  of  the  Citizens  Committee  to  Preserve  American  Freedoms! 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  At  the  Cosmopolitan  Hotel,  360  South  Westlake  Street,  Los 
Angeles  ? 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  "Was  the  Reverend  A.  A.  Heist  chairman  on  that  occasion? 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  And  the  speakers  were  witnesses  who  were  subpoenaed  before 
this  committee,  is  that  right  ? 

"A.  Yes.  This  committee  had  been  down  here  in  Los  Angeles  holding 
hearings  concerning  the  school  situation,  the  Communist  infiltration 
into  the  schools.  This  was  what  I  would  call  one  of  those  protest 
meetings  that  the  various  organizations  frequently  have  after  hearings 
of  this  sort. 

"Q.  Sometimes  before? 

"A.  Well,  yes,  true.  There  was  quite  a  crowd. 

"Q.  How  many  attended? 

"A.  Between  300  and  400  people  were  present.  They  had  recorded 
speeches  from  some  well  known  educators.  One  was  Dr.  Hugh  Wilson 
of  Princeton  University.  The  tenor  of  his  recorded  speech  was  that  they 
condemned  all  of  the  various  committee  investigations.  He  considered 
it  an  interference  in  academic  freedoms.  Another  recorded  speech  was 
played  by  Robert  Maynard  Hutchins,  who  was  Associate  Director  of  the 
Ford  Foundation  in  Pasadena,  and  former  Chancellor  of  the  University 
of  Chicago.  It  was  along  the  same  tenor,  condemning  committees. 

"Q.  You  sent  us  a  copy  of  that  report? 


UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN  CALIFORNIA  333 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  And  those  sentiments? 

"A.  Yes.  Then  they  had  the  various  teachers  who  had  been  before 
the  committee. 

"Q.  They  were  not  very  friendly  toward  us,  were  they? 

"A.  No.  They  didn't  say  anything  very  complimentary  about  you,  I 
assure  you.  Then  Mr.  Frank  Wilkinson  was  sort  of  an  usher  and  more 
or  less  showed  people  around  and  seated  them. 

"Q.  Did  he  participate  actively?  Did  he  speak  on  that  occasion? 

"A.  No,  he  did  not  speak,  but  his  wife  did,  Jean  Wilkinson.  He  was 
sort  of  head  usher. 

"Q.  On  the  twenty-seventh  day  of  January,  1954,  did  you  attend  a 
meeting  of  Women  for  Legislative  Action  ? 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  That  was  at  330  South  Las  Palmas,  Los  Angeles? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  Las  Palmas  Avenue.  That  was  the  residence  of  Sylvia  and 
Benjamin  Miller? 

"A.  Correct. 

"Q.  It  was  more  or  less  an  organizational  meeting? 

"A.  Yes.  The  Women  for  Legislative  Action  had  been  functioning 
for  a  number  of  years  as  a  daytime  group.  They  would  meet  on  weekday 
afternoons.  They  came  to  the  conclusion  that  there  were  quite  a  few 
women  who  were  employed,  or  for  some  reason  or  other  could  not 
attend  daytime  meetings.  They  decided  to  set  up  an  evening  chapter 
to  accommodate  those  people.  This  was  the  charter  meeting  of  the  eve- 
ning group. 

"Q.  Were  you  a  member  of  that  organization,  too? 

"A.  Yes,  sir,  I  was  a  charter  member  of  it  also. 

' '  Q.  How  many  attended  that  meeting  ? 

"A.  Between  45  and  50. 

"Q.  On  the  seventh  day  of  February,  1954,  did  you  attend,  at  the 
First  Unitarian  Church,  a  meeting  of  the  Unitarian  Public  Forum,  at 
which  time  the  chairman  was  the  Reverend  Stephen  Fritchman? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  Was  one  of  the  speakers  a  man  by  the  name  of  Dr.  Richard 
Weinerman  ? 

"A.  Yes,  that  is  correct. 

"Q.  Did  he  discuss  the  use  of  the  Fifth  Amendment  by  witnesses 
who  appeared  before  this  committee  ? 

"A.  No.  He  discussed  the  policies  of  the  Community  Medical  Center. 
The  other  speaker,  Harvey  O'Connor,  spoke  on  the  use  of  the  Fifth 
Amendment  defense  before  committees  of  this  type. 


334  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  IN   CALIFORNIA 

"Q.  How  many  people  attended  that  meeting? 

"A.  Between  300  and  350. 

"Q.  On  the  ninth  day  of  February,  1954,  did  you  attend  a  meeting  of 
the  First  Unitarian  Church  Forum,  at  which  time  the  chairman  was 
Stephen  Fritchman  and  the  speaker  was  Anna  Louise  Strong  ? 

"A.  Yes. 

"Q.  She  spoke  about  the  political  situation  in  Guatemala? 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

' '  Q.  How  many  people  attended  that  meeting  ? 

"A.  Between  200  and  250. 

' '  Q.  On  the  twelfth  day  of  February,  1954,  did  you  attend  a  meeting 
at  the  First  Unitarian  Church  in  Los  Angeles  regarding  the  loyalty 
oath? 

' '  A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  How  many  people  attended  that  meeting? 

''A.  Between  100  and  150. 

"Q.  On  the  twenty-fourth  day  of  February,  1954,  did  you  attend 
a  meeting  of  the  Women  for  Legislative  Action  at  612  North  Kilkea 
Street? 

"A.  Correct. 

"Q.  At  the  residence  of  Dr.  and  Mrs.  Simson  Marcus? 

"A.  That  is  correct. 

"Q.  That  was  regarding  the  Walter-McCarran  Act? 

"A.  Yes.  They,  of  course,  were  for  the  repeal  of  the  Walter-McCar- 
ran  Act. 

"Q.  How  many  people  attended  that  meeting? 

"A.  35  to  40. 

"Q.  On  the  28th  day  of  February,